QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ý

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

ý

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

o

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Chiron Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

N/A

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
         
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

o

 

No fee required.

ý

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

 

(1)

 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Chiron Corporation


 

 

(2)

 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        110,937,887 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2005(a)


 

 

(3)

 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        $45.00 per share of Chiron common stock (a)


 

 

(4)

 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        $5,173,149,117 (a)


 

 

(5)

 

Total fee paid:
        $553,527 (a)

    (a)   As of December 31, 2005, there were (i) 110,937,887 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Common Stock"), of Chiron Corporation ("Chiron") outstanding and owned by stockholders other than Novartis AG and its subsidiaries, (ii) options to purchase 17,042,501 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of less than $45.00 per share, and (iii) restricted stock units and restricted stock rights with respect to 838,655 shares of Common Stock. The filing fee was determined by adding (x) the product of (i) the number of shares of Common Stock that are proposed to be acquired in the merger and (ii) the merger consideration of $45.00 in cash per share of Common Stock, plus (y) $143,204,727 expected to be paid to holders of stock options with an exercise price of less than $45.00 per share granted by Chiron to purchase shares of Common Stock in exchange for the cancellation of such options, plus (z) $37,739,475 expected to be paid to holders of restricted stock units and restricted stock rights in exchange for the cancellation of such units and rights ((x), (y) and (z) together, the "Total Consideration"). The payment of the filing fee, calculated in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 0-11(c)(1), was calculated by multiplying the Total Consideration by .000107.

 

 

 

 

 

ý

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        

    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        

    (3)   Filing Party:
        

    (4)   Date Filed:
        


 

 

 

 

Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.

GRAPHIC

4560 Horton Street
Emeryville, California 94608


SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

                  , 2006

Dear Chiron Corporation Stockholders:

        You are invited to attend a special meeting of stockholders of Chiron Corporation in                  , on                  , 2006, at            , Pacific Time. At the special meeting, you will be asked to consider and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 30, 2005, among Chiron, Novartis Corporation, Novartis Biotech Partnership, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Novartis AG and an indirect subsidiary of Novartis Corporation, and Novartis AG, as guarantor.

        The merger contemplates Novartis Biotech Partnership, Inc. being merged with and into Chiron, with Chiron as the surviving corporation and becoming an indirect subsidiary of Novartis Corporation and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Novartis AG. Upon completion of the merger, each share of Chiron common stock not held by Novartis AG or any of its subsidiaries, Chiron or any of its subsidiaries or a stockholder of Chiron who perfects appraisal rights, will be converted into the right to receive $45.00 in cash, without interest.

        Under Delaware law, the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Chiron common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting is necessary to adopt the merger proposal. In addition, under the merger agreement, the parties have agreed that the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Chiron common stock not held by Novartis AG and its subsidiaries outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting is necessary to adopt the merger proposal.

        In accordance with Chiron's restated by-laws, the board of directors has fixed the close of business on                  , 2006, as the record date for the purpose of determining stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the special meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.

        A list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the special meeting may be examined at our executive offices, located at 4560 Horton Street, Emeryville, California 94608, during the 10-day period preceding the special meeting.

        On October 30, 2005, the board of directors of Chiron (with the three directors nominated to the board by Novartis AG having recused themselves) (1) determined that the merger and the merger agreement are fair to an in the best interests of Chiron's stockholders other than Novartis AG and its subsidiaries and (2) approved the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger. Therefore, the board of directors (other than the Novartis directors) recommends that you vote FOR the adoption of the merger agreement.

        Our board of directors knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the special meeting. If any other matters properly come before the special meeting, the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy or their substitutes will vote in accordance with their best judgment on such matters.

        The enclosed proxy statement provides you with a summary of the merger agreement and the merger, and provides additional information about the parties involved. The closing of the merger will occur as promptly as practicable following the adoption of the merger agreement at the special meeting

i



by Chiron stockholders, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the other conditions to the closing of the merger, as described in the enclosed proxy statement.

        YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. Therefore, whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting in person, please sign and return the enclosed proxy in the envelope provided. You also may vote your proxy by either calling the toll-free number or via the website shown on your proxy card. If you attend the special meeting and desire to vote in person, you may do so even though you have previously sent a proxy. Because adoption of the merger agreement requires, under Delaware law, the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Chiron common stock, and under the merger agreement, the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Chiron common stock not held by Novartis AG and its subsidiaries, outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting, the failure to vote will have the same effect as voting against the merger proposal.

        If your shares are held in "street name" by your broker, your broker will be unable to vote your shares without instructions from you. You should instruct your broker to vote your shares, following the procedures provided by your broker. FAILURE TO INSTRUCT YOUR BROKER TO VOTE YOUR SHARES WILL HAVE THE SAME EFFECT AS VOTING AGAINST ADOPTION OF THE MERGER PROPOSAL.

        Thank you for your support.

 
   
    Sincerely,

 

 


Howard H. Pien
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

        Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the merger, passed upon the merits or fairness of the merger, or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of the disclosure in this document. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

        This proxy statement, dated                  , 2006, will first be mailed to stockholders on or about                  , 2006.

ii


GRAPHIC

4560 Horton Street
Emeryville, California 94608


NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To be held on                  , 2006

        NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of stockholders of Chiron Corporation, a Delaware corporation, will be held in                  , on                  ,                   , 2006, at            , Pacific Time. A proxy card and a proxy statement for the special meeting are enclosed.

        The special meeting is for the purpose of:

1.
Considering and voting to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 30, 2005, among Chiron, Novartis Corporation, Novartis Biotech Partnership, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Novartis AG and an indirect subsidiary of Novartis Corporation, and Novartis AG, as guarantor. A copy of the merger agreement is attached as Annex A to the accompanying proxy statement.

2.
Approving adjournments or postponements of the special meeting, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the special meeting to adopt the merger agreement.

3.
Transacting any other business as may properly come before the meeting.

        Under Delaware law, approval of the merger proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of all outstanding shares of Chiron common stock entitled to vote. In addition, under the merger agreement, the parties have agreed that adoption of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of all shares other than those held by Novartis AG and its subsidiaries.

        In accordance with Chiron's by-laws, the board of directors has fixed the close of business on                  , 2006 as the record date for the purpose of determining stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the special meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.

        A list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the special meeting may be examined at our executive offices, located at 4560 Horton Street, Emeryville, California 94608, during the 10-day period preceding the special meeting.

        Under Delaware law, stockholders of Chiron are eligible to exercise appraisal rights in connection with the merger. A stockholder that does not vote in favor of the merger proposal and strictly complies with the other necessary procedural requirements will have the right to dissent from the merger and to seek appraisal of the fair value of their Chiron shares, exclusive of any element of value arising from the expectation or accomplishment of the merger. For a description of appraisal rights and the procedures to be followed to assert them, stockholders should review the provisions of Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, a copy of which is included as Annex D to the accompanying proxy statement.

        YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. Therefore, whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting in person, please sign and return the enclosed proxy in the envelope provided. You also may vote your proxy by either calling the toll-free number or via the website shown on your proxy card. If you attend the special meeting and desire to vote in person, you may do so even though you have previously sent a proxy. BECAUSE ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT REQUIRES, UNDER DELAWARE LAW, THE

iii



AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF HOLDERS OF A MAJORITY OF THE SHARES OF CHIRON COMMON STOCK, AND UNDER THE MERGER AGREEMENT, THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF HOLDERS OF A MAJORITY OF THE SHARES OF CHIRON COMMON STOCK NOT HELD BY NOVARTIS AG AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, OUTSTANDING AND ENTITLED TO VOTE AT THE SPECIAL MEETING, THE FAILURE TO VOTE WILL HAVE THE SAME EFFECT AS VOTING AGAINST THE MERGER PROPOSAL.

 
   
    Sincerely,

 

 


Ursula B. Bartels
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

                  , 2006
Emeryville, California

iv



SUMMARY TERM SHEET

        This summary highlights important and material information from this proxy statement but does not purport to be complete. To fully understand the merger described in this proxy statement, you should read carefully the entire proxy statement. We have included section references to direct you to a more complete description of the topics contained in this summary.

v


vi


Director/
Executive Officer

  Unvested
Stock Options

  Restricted
Stock Units/
Share Rights

  Change in
Control Plan

Ursula B. Bartels   $ 562,950   $ 877,500   $ 2,474,233
Jack Goldstein   $ 2,283,053   $ 2,790,000   $ 5,165,941
Anne Hill   $ 1,114,300   $ 405,000   $ 1,881,339
Jessica M. Hoover   $ 501,213   $ 491,400   $ 1,962,244
Meghan B. Leader   $ 513,218   $ 524,250   $ 1,598,530
Howard H. Pien   $ 5,121,543   $ 4,725,000   $ 11,861,444
Rino Rappuoli   $ 548,193   $ 855,000   $ 839,887
David V. Smith   $ 593,278   $ 1,030,500   $ 2,336,331
Daniel B. Soland   $ 1,389,000   $ 630,000   $ 2,757,659
Bryan L. Walser   $ 522,875   $ 888,750   $ 1,870,006
Gene W. Walther   $ 1,077,169   $ 716,400   $ 2,684,493
Craig A. Wheeler   $ 1,449,970   $ 1,170,000   $ 4,077,296

vii


viii



QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER

Q: What Am I Being Asked to Vote On?

A: You are being asked to vote on the adoption of the merger agreement entered into among Chiron Corporation, Novartis Corporation, Novartis Biotech Partnership, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Novartis AG and an indirect subsidiary of Novartis Corporation, and Novartis AG, as guarantor. Pursuant to the merger agreement, Novartis Biotech Partnership, Inc. will be merged with and into Chiron, with Chiron surviving as an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Novartis AG and an indirect subsidiary of Novartis Corporation. See "The Merger Agreement—The Merger" on page 52.

Q: When and Where Is the Special Meeting?

A: The special meeting of stockholders of Chiron will be held in                  , on                  ,                  , 2006, at            , Pacific Time. See "The Special Meeting" beginning on page 2.

Q: May I Attend the Special Meeting?

A: All stockholders of record as of the close of business on                  , 2006, the record date, may attend the special meeting. Proof of ownership of Chiron common stock, such as a bank or brokerage account statement, as well as a form of personal identification, must be presented in order to be admitted to the special meeting.

Please note that if you hold your shares in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, and plan to vote at the meeting, you must also present at the meeting a proxy issued to you by the holder of record of your shares.

No cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags, briefcases or packages will be permitted in the special meeting.

Q: Who Can Vote at the Chiron Special Meeting?

A: You can vote at the special meeting if you owned shares of Chiron common stock at the close of business on                  , 2006, the record date. As of the close of business on that day, approximately                  shares of Chiron common stock were outstanding. See "The Special Meeting" beginning on page 2.

Q: How Are Votes Counted?

A: Votes will be counted by the inspector of election appointed for the special meeting, who will separately count "For" and "Against" votes, abstentions and broker non-votes. A "broker non-vote" occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not receive instructions with respect to the merger proposal from the beneficial owner. Because adoption of the merger agreement requires, under Delaware law, the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Chiron common stock, and under the merger agreement, the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Chiron common stock not held by Novartis AG and its subsidiaries, outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting, the failure to vote, broker non- votes and abstentions will have the same effect as voting "Against" the merger proposal.

Q: How Many Votes Are Required to Approve the Merger Proposal?

A: Under Delaware law, the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock as of the close of business on the record date is required to adopt the merger agreement. As of the close of business on                        , 2006, the record date, there were                        shares of Chiron common stock outstanding. This means that under Delaware law,

ix


                        shares or more must vote in the affirmative to adopt the merger agreement. Also, in the merger agreement, the Novartis entities and Chiron have agreed that the merger will be conditioned on the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of all outstanding shares other than those held by Novartis AG or its subsidiaries as of the close of business on the record date. As of the close of business on                        , 2006, the record date, there were                        shares of Chiron common stock outstanding other than those held by Novartis AG or its subsidiaries. This means that pursuant to the merger agreement, the merger is conditioned on the affirmative vote of                        shares or more. See "The Special Meeting" beginning on page 2.

Q: How Many Votes Do I Have?

A: You have one vote for each share of common stock you own as of the record date.

Q: If My Shares Are Held in "Street" Name by My Broker, Will My Broker Vote My Shares for Me?

A: Your broker will vote your shares only if you provide instructions to your broker on how to vote. You should instruct your broker to vote your shares by following the directions provided to you by your broker. See "The Special Meeting" beginning on page 2.

Q: What If I Fail to Instruct My Broker?

A: Without instructions, your broker will not vote any of your shares held in "street" name. Broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose of determining the presence or absence of a quorum, but will not be deemed votes cast and will have the same effect as a vote "Against" the merger proposal.

Q: Will My Shares Held in "Street" Name or Another Form of Record Ownership Be Combined for Voting Purposes With Shares I Hold of Record?

A: No. Because any shares you may hold in "street" name will be deemed to be held by a different stockholder than any shares you hold of record, any shares so held will not be combined for voting purposes with shares you hold of record. Similarly, if you own shares in various registered forms, such as jointly with your spouse, as trustee of a trust or as custodian for a minor, you will receive, and will need to sign and return, a separate proxy card for those shares because they are held in a different form of record ownership. Shares held by a corporation or business entity must be voted by an authorized officer of the entity, and shares held in an IRA must be voted under the rules governing the account.

Q: What Happens If I Do Not Vote?

A: Because the vote required is based on the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on the record date, and not just of the shares that are voted, if you do not vote, it will have the same effect as a vote against the merger proposal. If the merger is completed, whether or not you vote for the merger proposal, you will be paid the merger consideration for your shares of Chiron common stock upon completion of the merger, unless you properly exercise your appraisal rights as described in "Appraisal Rights" beginning on page 49. See "The Special Meeting" beginning on page 2.

Q: When Should I Send in My Stock Certificates?

A: After the special meeting, you will receive a letter of transmittal to complete and return to                  , which is the exchange agent. In order to receive the merger consideration as soon as reasonably practicable following the completion of the merger, you must send the exchange agent your validly completed letter of transmittal together with your Chiron stock certificates as instructed in the separate mailing. You should not send in your stock certificates now.

x


Q: When Can I Expect to Receive the Merger Consideration For My Shares?

A: Once the merger is completed, you will be sent in a separate mailing a letter of transmittal and other documents to be delivered to the exchange agent in order to receive the merger consideration. Once you have submitted your properly completed letter of transmittal, Chiron stock certificates and other required documents, to the exchange agent, the exchange agent will send you the merger consideration as soon as reasonably practicable.

Q: I Do Not Know Where My Stock Certificate Is. How Will I Get My Cash?

A: The materials we will send you after completion of the merger will include the procedures that you must follow if you cannot locate your stock certificate. This will include an affidavit that you will need to sign attesting to the loss of your certificate. We may also require that you provide a bond to cover any potential loss to Chiron.

Q: What Do I Need to Do Now?

A: You should indicate your vote on your proxy card and sign and mail your proxy card in the enclosed return envelope as soon as possible so that your shares may be represented at the special meeting. You may also vote your proxy by either calling the toll-free number or via the website shown on your proxy card. The meeting will take place on                  , 2006. See "The Special Meeting" beginning on page 2.

Q: What Happens If I Sell My Shares of Chiron Common Stock Before the Special Meeting?

A: The record date for the special meeting is earlier than the expected date of the merger. If you transfer your shares of Chiron common stock after the record date but before the special meeting, you will, unless special arrangements are made, retain your right to vote at the special meeting but will transfer the right to receive the merger consideration to the person to whom you transfer your shares.

Q: Can I Change My Vote After I Have Mailed in My Proxy Card?

A: Yes. You can change your vote at any time before we vote your proxy at the special meeting. You can do so in one of three ways. First, you can send a written notice stating that you would like to revoke your proxy to the Secretary of Chiron at the address given below. Second, you can request a new proxy card and complete it and send it to the Secretary of Chiron at: 4560 Horton Street, M/S R-422, Emeryville, California 94608 or complete a new proxy by calling the toll-free number or via the website shown on your proxy card. Third, you can attend the special meeting and vote in person. You should send any written notice or request for a new proxy card to the attention of Corporate Secretary, Chiron Corporation, 4560 Horton Street, Emeryville, California 94608. Voting by telephone, over the Internet or by mailing in your proxy card will not prevent you from voting in person at the meeting. See "The Special Meeting" beginning on page 2.

Q: Who Can Answer Further Questions?

A: If you would like additional copies of this proxy statement or a new proxy card or if you have questions about the merger, you should contact our Corporate Secretary, Chiron Corporation, 4560 Horton Street, Emeryville, California 94608. You may call our proxy solicitor Innisfree M&A, Incorporated toll-free at 888-750-5835 (banks and brokers may call collect at 212-750-5833) or Novartis' proxy solicitor, Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc., toll-free at 877-278-4774 (banks and brokers may call collect at 212-440-9800).

xi



TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION   1

THE PARTIES TO THE TRANSACTION

 

1

THE SPECIAL MEETING

 

2
 
Date, Time and Place

 

2
  Matters to be Considered   2
  Record Date; Shares Outstanding and Entitled to Vote   2
  Quorum; Vote Required   2
  Voting and Revocation of Proxies   3
  Proxy Solicitation   3

SPECIAL FACTORS

 

4
 
Background of the Merger

 

4
  Fairness of the Merger; Recommendation of the Non-Novartis Directors of Chiron's Board of Directors   10
  Novartis' Purpose and Reasons for the Merger   15
  Position of the Novartis Entities Regarding Fairness of Merger   16
  Chiron Agreement with Schering AG Relating to Betaseron®   19
  Opinions of Chiron's Financial Advisors   20
  Other Written Presentations   30
  Certain Slides Prepared by Financial Advisors   30
  Certain Effects of the Merger   31
  Plans for Chiron After the Merger   32
  Conduct of Business of Chiron if the Merger is not Completed   32
  Interests of Chiron's Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger   33
  Transactions and Relationships Between Novartis and Chiron   37
  Transactions in Chiron Stock   44
  Material Federal Income Tax Considerations   44
  Litigation   45
  Regulatory Approvals   46
  Source and Amount of Funds; Financing for the Merger   47
  Fees and Expenses   47

APPRAISAL RIGHTS

 

49
     

xii



THE MERGER AGREEMENT

 

52
 
The Merger

 

52
  Effect of the Merger on Common Stock   52
  Treatment of Options and Share Rights   53
  Directors and Officers   53
  Representations and Warranties   53
  Conduct of Business Pending the Merger   54
  Actions to be Taken to Complete the Merger   56
  No Solicitation of Acquisition Proposals   56
  Employee Benefits   57
  Indemnification of Officers and Directors   58
  Closing Conditions   58
  Termination   59
  Amendment of the Merger Agreement   60
  Assignment   60
  Expenses   60

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

 

61
 
Ownership of Major Stockholders

 

61
  Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers   61

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

63

SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

64

MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION

 

65

FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS

 

65

OTHER MATTERS

 

68

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

69

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

 

70
ANNEX A   AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
ANNEX B   OPINION OF CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON LLC
ANNEX C   OPINION OF MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED
ANNEX D   SECTION 262 OF THE DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW

xiii



INTRODUCTION

        This proxy statement and the accompanying form of proxy are being furnished to the holders of shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, of Chiron Corporation, a Delaware corporation, in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the board of directors of Chiron for use at the special meeting of the stockholders of Chiron to be held in                  , on                   ,                  , 2006, at            , Pacific Time.

        We are asking our stockholders to vote on the adoption of the merger agreement, dated as of October 30, 2005, among Chiron, Novartis Corporation, Novartis Biotech Partnership, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Novartis AG and an indirect subsidiary of Novartis Corporation, and Novartis AG, as guarantor. If the merger is completed, we will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Novartis, and our stockholders (other than Novartis AG and its subsidiaries and other than those who perfect their appraisal rights under Delaware law) will have the right to receive $45.00 in cash without interest for each share of our common stock.


THE PARTIES TO THE TRANSACTION

        Chiron Corporation was incorporated in California in 1981 and merged into a Delaware corporation in November 1986. Chiron is a global biopharmaceutical company that participates in three healthcare markets: blood testing, vaccines, and biopharmaceuticals. Our revenues, which totaled $1.7 billion in 2004, consist of product sales, revenues from a joint business contractual arrangement, collaborative agreement revenues, royalty and license fee revenues and other revenues, primarily consisting of contract manufacturing and grant revenues. Our research and development efforts are focused on programs to improve blood safety, developing next generation influenza manufacturing capability and new vaccines for pandemic preparedness, broadening our meningococcal franchise and developing products for oncology and infectious and pulmonary disease.

        Novartis currently owns approximately 43.9% of our outstanding common stock, including 6,896,552 newly issued shares sold to Novartis Biotech Partnership, Inc. on December 8, 2005 pursuant to Chiron's exercise of its mandatory subscription rights contained in the subscription agreement with Novartis AG. These shares were issued for $300 million at $43.50 per share. Novartis AG also has an option to acquire additional newly issued shares from Chiron at a market price to increase its ownership to 55%.

        Our principal executive offices are located at 4560 Horton Street, Emeryville, California 94608, and our main telephone number is (510) 655-8730.

        Novartis AG is a Swiss corporation with principal executive offices at Lichtstrasse 35, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland. The telephone number of Novartis AG's principal executives is 011-41-61-324-1111. Novartis AG's group of companies is a world leader in the discovery, development, manufacture and marketing of prescription medications.

        Novartis Corporation is a New York corporation with principal executive offices at 608 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10020 and is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Novartis AG. The telephone number of Novartis Corporation's executive offices is (212) 307-1122. Novartis Corporation indirectly owns most of the companies of the Novartis AG group operating in the U.S.

        Novartis Biotech Partnership, Inc., or Novartis Biotech, is a Delaware corporation with principal executive offices at 608 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10020 and is an indirect subsidiary of Novartis Corporation and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Novartis AG. Novartis Biotech was formed on November 18, 1994 for the purpose of holding Novartis AG's investment in Chiron and to date, Novartis Biotech has engaged in no activities other than those relating to Novartis AG's investment in Chiron and its participation in the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

1



THE SPECIAL MEETING

Date, Time and Place

        The special meeting is scheduled to be held on in                  ,                   ,                  , 2006, at                  , Pacific Time.

Matters to be Considered

        At the special meeting, Chiron stockholders will be asked:

        On October 30, 2005, the board of directors of Chiron (with the three directors nominated to the board by Novartis having recused themselves) (1) determined that the merger and the merger agreement are fair to and in the best interests of Chiron's stockholders other than Novartis AG and its subsidiaries and (2) approved the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger. Therefore, the board of directors of Chiron (other than the Novartis directors) recommends that you vote FOR the adoption of the merger agreement. See "Special Factors—Fairness of the Merger; Recommendation of the Non-Novartis Directors of Chiron's Board of Directors" beginning on page 10.

        Our board of directors knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the special meeting. If any other matters properly come before the special meeting, the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy or their substitutes will vote in accordance with their best judgment on such matters.

Record Date; Shares Outstanding and Entitled to Vote

        Our board of directors has fixed the close of business on                  , 2006 as the record date for the determination of the holders of Chiron's common stock entitled to notice of and to vote at the special meeting.

        Only holders of record of Chiron's common stock as of the close of business on                  , 2006, the record date, will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the special meeting. As of the record date, there were approximately                  shares of Chiron common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting, held by approximately                   stockholders of record, with each share entitled to one vote.

Quorum; Vote Required

        The presence, in person or represented by proxy, of holders of a majority of the shares of common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting will constitute a quorum. Both abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose of determining the presence or absence of a quorum. Under Delaware law, approval of the merger proposal will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Chiron common stock outstanding on the record date. As of the close of business on                        , 2006, the record date, there were            shares of Chiron common stock outstanding. This means that under Delaware law,        shares or more must vote in the affirmative to adopt the merger agreement. Under the merger agreement, the parties have agreed that approval of the merger agreement will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Chiron common stock not held by Novartis AG or its subsidiaries outstanding on the record date. As of the close of business on                        , 2006, the record date, there were            

2



shares of Chiron common stock outstanding other than those held by Novartis AG or its subsidiaries. This means that pursuant to the merger agreement, the merger is conditioned on the affirmative vote of        shares or more.

        Novartis AG and its subsidiaries will be present or represented at the special meeting and will vote for the merger proposal. While their presence or representation at the special meeting and vote for the merger proposal, by itself, will not satisfy the quorum requirement or the vote required pursuant to Delaware law, the 43.9% of our outstanding shares held by them will substantially reach such quorum and vote requirement. However, Novartis AG and its subsidiaries' vote will not be counted for purposes of the vote required pursuant to the merger agreement.

        The merger will not be completed, and you will not receive the merger consideration, if either of the votes described above are not obtained. Your vote is very important. FAILURE TO VOTE WILL HAVE THE SAME EFFECT AS A VOTE AGAINST THE MERGER.

Voting and Revocation of Proxies

        Stockholders are requested to complete, date, sign and promptly return the accompanying form of proxy in the enclosed envelope. You may also vote your proxy by either calling the toll-free number or via the website shown on the proxy card. Shares of Chiron common stock represented by properly executed proxies received by Chiron and not revoked will be voted at the special meeting in accordance with the instructions contained in the proxies. If instructions are not given, proxies will be voted for adoption of the merger agreement. However, brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote shares held in street name. Accordingly, a broker non-vote will have the same effect as a vote against the merger proposal. An abstention will also have the same effect as a vote against the merger proposal.

        Any proxy may be revoked at any time before it is voted either by delivering to the Corporate Secretary of Chiron, at Chiron Corporation, 4560 Horton Street, M/S R-422, Emeryville, California 94608, written notice of such revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or by completing a new proxy by calling the toll-free number or via the website shown on your proxy card, or by attending the special meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the special meeting will not, in and of itself, constitute revocation of a proxy.

        All votes will be tabulated by the inspector of election appointed for the special meeting, who will separately tabulate "for" votes, "against" votes, abstentions and broker non-votes. As described above, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote against the merger proposal.

Proxy Solicitation

        We and Novartis will share the cost of printing, filing and mailing this proxy statement in connection with the special meeting. In addition to solicitation by mail, our directors, officers and regular employees may solicit proxies from stockholders in person, by telephone, or otherwise. Directors, officers and employees will not receive additional compensation in connection with their solicitation of proxies. Brokers, nominees, fiduciaries and other custodians have been requested to forward soliciting material to the beneficial owners of shares of Chiron common stock held of record by them, and such custodians will be reimbursed by us for their reasonable expenses. We retained Innisfree to provide a number of information, analytic and other services, including assisting with the solicitation of proxies from stockholders, pursuant to an engagement letter under which we pay Innisfree $25,000 per month. We estimate that the portion of the fee payable to Innisfree that is allocable to the anticipated proxy solicitation period will range from $25,000 to $50,000. We have also agreed to reimburse Innisfree for reasonable expenses. Novartis has retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. and MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to assist with the solicitation of proxies from stockholders for a fee of $50,000 and                        , respectively, plus, in each case, reasonable expenses.

        You should not send any stock certificates representing shares of Chiron common stock with your proxy. Once the merger has been completed you will receive a separate mailing with instructions on where and how to mail your stock certificates and your letter of transmittal.

3



SPECIAL FACTORS

        Except as otherwise noted, references to Novartis in this section "Special Factors" are to Novartis AG.

Background of the Merger

        Novartis (through its predecessor company Ciba-Geigy Limited) initially acquired its interest in Chiron in 1994 and currently owns approximately 43.9% of the outstanding common stock of Chiron. As part of its original investment, Novartis also obtained a right to acquire the remaining shares of Chiron common stock it did not already own at a price an unaffiliated party would pay only after complying with various procedures set forth in the governance agreement with Chiron, as well as a right to increase its stake in Chiron to up to 55% either by acquiring an amount of newly issued shares from the Company (based on a market price formula) or through market purchases. Also as part of these agreements, Chiron acquired the right to require Novartis to purchase, under certain conditions and based on a market price formula, up to $500 million in newly issued shares, pursuant to which Chiron issued to Novartis Biotech on December 8, 2005 6,896,552 shares of common stock for $300 million at $43.50 per share.

        Over the eleven years that Novartis has been Chiron's largest stockholder, Chiron has periodically held exploratory discussions with Novartis on a number of strategic initiatives, including, on occasion, mergers, significant acquisitions and other transactions, including some discussions initiated by Novartis. As Chiron's largest stockholder, Novartis' view has been one factor affecting the Chiron board's decision-making process with respect to strategic matters.

        From time to time, Novartis has consulted Goldman, Sachs & Co., or Goldman Sachs, with respect to its Chiron investment. Novartis formally engaged Goldman Sachs on August 31, 2005 to assist Novartis management in preparing its financial analysis, and for Goldman Sachs' strategic expertise in connection with a possible transaction involving Chiron. Novartis engaged Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz to act as its legal counsel in connection with Novartis' analysis and evaluation of the Chiron situation and to assist Novartis in connection with a possible transaction in October 2004.

        On December 2, 2004, Lewis Coleman, Chiron's lead independent director, and Dr. Raymund Breu, a Novartis designee to the Chiron board and Chief Financial Officer of Novartis, met and discussed, among other things, the recent developments involving FLUVIRIN® and the fact that Novartis was considering all of its options regarding its Chiron stake but that in the absence of access to due diligence, including with respect to Chiron's manufacturing facility in Liverpool, England, Novartis was not in a position to decide how it wished to proceed. Dr. Breu indicated in general terms that these potential options included maintaining Novartis' current investment in Chiron, increasing Novartis' percentage ownership in Chiron to over 50% through the acquisition of newly issued Chiron shares under the existing market price option agreement between Novartis and Chiron or otherwise as permitted under the governance agreement between Novartis and Chiron, seeking to acquire all of the remaining shares of Chiron, entering into strategic initiatives involving Chiron or its vaccines business, or potentially seeking to divest its existing interest in Chiron.

        The recent developments involving FLUVIRIN related to the fact that, during the third quarter of 2004, in conducting final internal release procedures for its FLUVIRIN influenza virus vaccine, Chiron's quality systems identified lots that did not meet product sterility specifications. On October 5, 2004, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, or MHRA, prohibited Chiron from releasing any FLUVIRIN vaccine doses manufactured at its Liverpool, England facility since March 2, 2004 and suspended Chiron's license to manufacture influenza virus vaccine in the facility for three months (the suspension was later extended for an additional three months). Following these events and prior to the December 2 meeting between Mr. Coleman and Dr. Breu, Chiron received a grand jury subpoena from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York requesting production of certain documents relating to FLUVIRIN vaccine and the license suspension, and certain of

4



Chiron's officers and directors were named as defendants in several putative shareholder class action and derivative lawsuits alleging various claims arising out of or relating to these developments regarding FLUVIRIN vaccine. Following the license suspension, Chiron developed and embarked on an extensive remediation effort with respect to its Liverpool facility.

        In a conversation on January 11, 2005, Mr. Coleman informed Dr. Breu that, in light of on-going extensive remediation efforts with respect to Chiron's Liverpool facility and FLUVIRIN manufacturing generally, the time and resources required of Chiron management and the Chiron board of directors with respect to the remediation efforts and the potential disruption to those executing the remediation plan resulting from the visit of due diligence teams at the Liverpool plant and the need for Chiron's board to have a thorough discussion of Chiron's strategy, it was not an opportune time for Chiron to divert resources in order to facilitate due diligence for Novartis.

        On March 8, 2005, Mr. Coleman and Dr. Breu met again and discussed certain high level strategic matters regarding Chiron and Novartis' intentions with respect to Chiron, including specifically whether Novartis was considering making an offer to purchase those shares of Chiron common stock that Novartis did not already own. Dr. Breu explained that Novartis was not at that time prepared to make a proposal with respect to Chiron, but indicated that if Novartis was given the opportunity to perform due diligence, depending on the outcome of that due diligence, Novartis might make an offer.

        A meeting of the non-Novartis directors was held in late March 2005, which Ursula B. Bartels, Vice President and General Counsel and other members of Chiron management and a representative of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, legal counsel to Chiron and the non-Novartis directors, also attended. At that meeting, Howard Pien, Chiron's Chief Executive Officer, discussed briefly, among other things, the remediation efforts at Chiron's Liverpool facility. In addition, Mr. Coleman reported on his discussions with Dr. Breu, and a representative of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP discussed with the board members their fiduciary duties. Following discussion of these matters, the non-Novartis directors concluded that, in order to be prepared to respond to any offer from Novartis, Chiron would need to update its long-range plan and obtain advice from financial advisors with respect to Chiron's valuation and instructed management to undertake this updating and evaluation. Chiron communicated the results of this meeting to Novartis.

        The long-range plan is a rolling ten-year plan for each of Chiron's three business units—biopharmaceuticals, vaccines and blood-testing—prepared by Chiron management. The long-range plan addresses Chiron's strategies for each business unit and includes forecasts of Chiron's financial performance on a business unit-by-business unit basis and a description of the key drivers and assumptions underlying those forecasts. The plan is prepared annually by management each summer and is then reviewed with the Chiron board at its September meeting. At the direction of the non-Novartis directors, beginning in March 2005 Chiron management undertook an update of the 2004 long-range plan that had been approved by the board at its meeting in September 2004. Chiron's executive management team (without involving less senior members of management for confidentiality purposes) undertook this update by, among other things, analyzing and updating the key assumptions underlying the 2004 long-range plan and revising the projections contained in the plan accordingly. The projections contained under "Financial Projections" were derived from the 2004 long-range plan, after updating by Chiron management as described above and additional updating in September 2005 as discussed below on page 65.

        Since and including Novartis' initial acquisition of its interest in Chiron in 1994, the principal representatives of each of Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley with respect to this current transaction have advised Chiron and its board of directors regarding various strategic initiatives, including on occasion in connection with discussions between Chiron and Novartis. On April 15, 2005, in accordance with the instructions from the non-Novartis directors at the late March meeting, Chiron formalized its

5



engagement of Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley with respect to a possible transaction with Novartis and entered into engagement letters with those firms.

        A meeting of the non-Novartis directors was held on April 25, 2005. Jessica M. Hoover, Vice President, Head of Corporate Business Development, and Ms. Bartels and a representative of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP also attended this meeting, as did representatives of Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley. During the meeting, Mr. Pien reviewed the materials being prepared by Chiron management for the meeting of the non-Novartis directors to be held on May 20, 2005 to discuss the updating of the 2004 long-range plan. Ms. Hoover reported that Chiron had engaged financial advisors—Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley—as directed by the non-Novartis directors at the late March meeting. Mr. Coleman reported on discussions he had had with Dr. Breu and a representative of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP reported on discussions held with representatives of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz regarding the process for due diligence activities should the board determine to approve due diligence by Novartis and the next steps in the event Novartis determined to make an offer.

        A subsequent meeting of the non-Novartis directors was held on May 20, 2005. Also in attendance at this meeting were Ms. Hoover, Ms. Bartels, Dr. Goldstein, President and Chief Operating Officer of Chiron, other members of management and representatives of Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. At this meeting, management of Chiron presented the update to Chiron's 2004 long-range plan. Following an overview by Dr. Goldstein of the long-range plan update and the key assumptions underlying the plan, Dr. Goldstein, other members of management and the board discussed the plan and key assumptions. The representatives of Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley then made a presentation to the non-Novartis directors that included a discussion of the long-range plan and a preliminary discussion of Chiron's valuation. See "—Other Written Presentations" for further information on this presentation made by Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley. Following these presentations and further discussion by the non-Novartis directors, the non-Novartis directors agreed that Mr. Coleman would report to Novartis that due diligence could take place in the beginning of June 2005, subject to an appropriate confidentiality agreement.

        Another meeting of the non-Novartis directors was held on May 26, 2005, which was also attended by Dr. Goldstein, Ms. Hoover, Ms. Bartels, other members of management and representatives of Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley. The purpose of this meeting, as explained by Mr. Coleman, was to update the non-Novartis directors on discussions that had been held with Novartis, including the coordination of due diligence. Mr. Coleman also informed the non-Novartis directors of a discussion he had had with Dr. Breu on the timing of due diligence. Ms. Hoover described the due diligence process that had been agreed upon between Chiron and Novartis. Representatives of Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley reviewed their financial analyses from the prior meeting of the non-Novartis directors, and the non-Novartis directors and the representatives of the financial advisors discussed generally Chiron's strategic options and the impact of Novartis' ownership in Chiron on these options. No action was taken formally or informally by the non-Novartis directors at this meeting. On the same date, Novartis and Chiron entered into a confidentiality agreement.

        From May 31, 2005 to June 2, 2005, Novartis and its advisors conducted preliminary due diligence with respect to Chiron. In addition to management presentations, representatives of Novartis toured various Chiron facilities in the United States and Europe, including in Emeryville, California; Vacaville, California; Liverpool, England; Siena, Italy; Rosia, Italy; and Marburg, Germany. In late June 2005, Novartis, through Dr. Breu, informed Mr. Coleman that Novartis would not be able to decide whether or not to make an offer for Chiron unless and until Novartis conducted further due diligence and received the results of the pending FDA inspection of Chiron's Liverpool facility, which inspection was expected to occur in July 2005, because Novartis considered the results of the FDA's inspection of the Liverpool facility critical in determining whether Chiron would be capable of delivering flu vaccine for the 2005-2006 influenza season and of maintaining its market share in flu vaccines going forward.

6



Following that inspection, Novartis conducted additional due diligence consisting of a second site visit to Chiron's facility in Liverpool on August 12, 2005.

        On August 18, 2005, Dr. Breu informed Mr. Coleman that Novartis' board would be meeting to consider whether to make an offer for the outstanding shares of Chiron not owned by Novartis. On August 25 and 26, 2005, the Novartis board met and resolved that it was supportive in principle of making an offer to acquire all of Chiron and delegated the authority to management to decide whether or not, and on what terms, to make such an offer. Following the board meeting, Dr. Breu informed Mr. Coleman that Novartis was still deliberating but might make an offer for Chiron shortly and that, if it did so, it might be appropriate for the parties to meet in person to discuss any such offer. A meeting of the non-Novartis directors was held on August 28, 2005. Ms. Hoover and representatives of Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP also participated in this meeting. At the meeting, Mr. Coleman reported on this conversation with Dr. Breu. A representative of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP reviewed again with the non-Novartis directors their fiduciary obligations, and representatives of management discussed with the non-Novartis directors certain updates to Chiron's long-range plan. The non-Novartis directors determined that further updates by management and the financial advisors would be required in the event Chiron had to respond to an offer from Novartis, and also selected those members of the board and management who would attend a meeting with Novartis, in the event any such meeting were to take place.

        On August 29, 2005, Chiron learned that the FDA found as a result of its inspection of Chiron's Liverpool facility, that Chiron's responses and proposed corrective actions to the FDA's prior warning letter to be "generally acceptable." Chiron promptly informed Novartis of the results of the inspection.

        On August 31, 2005, Novartis sent Chiron a letter with respect to a proposed offer for Chiron, which it also included within Amendment No. 11 to its Schedule 13D with respect to Chiron, filed on September 1, 2005 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In its letter, Novartis offered to acquire all of the shares of Chiron common stock that Novartis did not already own for $40.00 per share in cash. Novartis also stated that it intended to condition its proposal on the approval of a majority of the outstanding Chiron shares not owned by Novartis and that it had no intention of selling its Chiron shares.

        The non-Novartis directors held a meeting on September 1, 2005, with Ms. Hoover, Ms. Bartels and representatives of Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP in attendance. At this meeting, the participants discussed, among other things, Novartis' $40.00 offer, the offer letter and its Schedule 13D amendment. The non-Novartis directors agreed that management and the financial advisors should provide certain updates to the long-range plan and the financial analyses of Chiron and scheduled an additional meeting to receive these updates. On September 4, 2005, the non-Novartis directors met, with Dr. Goldstein, David Smith, Chief Financial Officer, Ms. Hoover, Ms. Bartels, the head of each of Chiron's three business units and other members of management and representatives of Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and Citigate Sard Verbinnen, communications consultant to Chiron in attendance. At the September 4 meeting, Dr. Goldstein and the heads of Chiron's three business units discussed with the non-Novartis directors additional updates to the long-range plan previously discussed at the May 26 meeting that resulted from events that had taken place since the May 26 meeting, including, among other things, reduced expected PROLEUKIN revenues as a result of accelerated approval of competing compounds, developments with respect to PULMINIQ™ and developments with respect to production of influenza vaccines for the 2005-2006 season. In addition, representatives of Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley made a presentation to the non-Novartis directors with respect to Chiron's valuation See "—Other Written Presentations" for further information on this presentation made by Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley. Representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP discussed with the non-Novartis directors their fiduciary duties. Based on all relevant factors they considered material, including, among other things, the updated long-range plan presented by management and Chiron's prospects and the preliminary valuation and financial analyses

7


as presented by and discussed with Chiron's financial advisors, the non-Novartis directors determined that the Novartis offer was inadequate and directed management to issue a press release to that effect. The material factors considered by the non-Novartis directors in reaching this determination, including with respect to Chiron's prospects, are the same factors described under "Fairness of the Merger; Recommendation of the Non-Novartis Directors of Chiron's Board of Directors," but viewed in light of Novartis' then offer of $40.00. The financial projections considered by the non-Novartis directors in making this determination have been included in this document under "Financial Projections." In addition, the non-Novartis directors believed that Novartis would be willing to pay a higher price.

        In the following weeks, representatives of Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley, on the one hand, and Goldman Sachs, on the other, held discussions from time to time concerning the valuation of Chiron. Representatives of Goldman Sachs explained Novartis' due diligence findings and the rationale behind Novartis' $40.00 offer. Novartis viewed the $40.00 offer as an attractive all-cash premium offer to Chiron's shareholders, particularly in light of the risks associated with Chiron's business and regulatory strategies. These risks included uncertainty surrounding Chiron's manufacturing problems at its Liverpool, England and Marburg, Germany facilities and its related ongoing remediation efforts, its relationships with various regulatory authorities in light of these production difficulties and uncertainty as to Chiron's ultimate exposure in connection with its flu vaccine-related litigation. Novartis formed the opinion, as a result of its due diligence, that Chiron's broad operations limited its ability to invest appropriately across its three businesses and that Chiron would benefit from the financial resources of a much larger company. In particular, heavy investment in Chiron's biopharmaceutical unit limited Chiron's ability to invest appropriately into manufacturing and research and development for its vaccines and blood testing businesses. Novartis believed, as a result of its due diligence, that Chiron's under-investment in vaccines manufacturing led to the production problems at its Liverpool and Marburg facilities and posed a risk of additional production problems. In addition, Novartis believed that Chiron's vaccine product pipeline needed to be replenished and would require a combination of internal product development, product in-licensing and technology acquisitions. Novartis further believed the Chiron's blood testing franchise would require substantial investment in the medium term to maintain its proprietary position. In addition, in Novartis' opinion, other business risks included a high degree of uncertainty regarding the future of Chiron's biopharmaceutical product pipeline in light of recent late stage product failures such as Pulminiq's approvable letter and Tifacogin's failure to meet study endpoints in the OPTIMIST phase III trial and the relatively early stage balance of the pipeline, as well as the need to improve management oversight and control over Chiron's wide-ranging operations spread across geographic regions. Further, in light of Chiron's manufacturing problems, key Chiron personnel were diverted from their regular duties in order to manage Chiron's remediation efforts. The $40.00 offer represented a 12% premium to Chiron's one week average trading price and acquiring all of the remaining outstanding Chiron shares would also eliminate any potential future downside risk for Chiron's shareholders. Representatives of Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley discussed the Novartis offer in the context of their financial analysis of Chiron.

        With the knowledge and approval of their respective clients, but without specific direction or authority to make price proposals, the parties' financial advisors began to explore ranges of value that they believed might prompt their respective clients to engage in further discussions. During this period, the Chiron financial advisors had suggested to Novartis' financial advisors that Novartis consider making an offer in excess of $50.00. However, the Novartis financial advisors maintained their position that $40.00 was a fair price and that Novartis would not consider ranges in the $50.00's or even in the mid to high $40.00's. As a result of these discussions over a several week period, the Novartis financial advisors came to a range of $43.00-$44.00 per share and the Chiron financial advisors came to $46.00 per share or higher, in each case as potential valuations that might prompt their respective clients to engage in further discussions.

8


        Chiron's and Novartis' respective financial advisors discussed the proposed value ranges with their clients. Chiron's financial advisors consulted with Chiron management, representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and Chiron's lead independent director and other non-Novartis directors, including at the board meetings described in the following paragraph, prior to each meeting to determine the strategy for continuing discussions with a view to maximizing any offer Novartis might make.

        Meetings of the non-Novartis directors were held on each of September 14, September 22 and September 28. Each meeting was attended by Ms. Hoover and various members of management and representatives of Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. The meetings were generally held for the purpose of updating the non-Novartis directors on the status of discussions between Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley, on the one hand, and Goldman Sachs, on the other, and generally no actions were taken formally or informally at these meetings other than to authorize representatives of Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley to continue their discussions with representatives of Goldman Sachs or to wait for further contact from Goldman Sachs. A meeting of the non-Novartis directors was held on October 18 with Dr. Goldstein, Ms. Hoover and Ms. Bartels and representatives of Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP at which the non-Novartis directors were updated on the status of discussions between the representatives of Chiron's and Novartis' respective financial advisors. At this meeting, Mr. Pien discussed updates to Chiron's business and reviewed Chiron's recent earnings release and related matters. Representatives of Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley made a presentation to the non-Novartis directors with respect to Chiron's valuation See "—Other Written Presentations" for further information on this presentation made by Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley.

        On October 20, 2005, Dr. Breu spoke to Mr. Coleman and asked whether the non-Novartis directors were aware of the discussions between the financial advisors and were prepared to meet to discuss further a possible transaction on the basis of those discussions. The parties agreed to meet on October 28, 2005 in New York to discuss whether a transaction might be possible. On October 21, 2005, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, Novartis' legal counsel, distributed to Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Chiron's legal counsel, a draft merger agreement, and on October 27, 2005, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP delivered a comprehensive redraft of the agreement.

        On the evening of October 28, Ms. Hoover and three non-Novartis directors, for Chiron, and Dr. Breu and other members of Novartis management, for Novartis, as well as representatives of their respective financial and legal advisors met to discuss the proposed transaction, including discussions of price and, to be prepared in the event the parties were able to reach agreement on a price, the terms of the merger agreement. The parties determined to defer any price discussions on October 28 in order to allow legal counsel for both sides to seek to narrow the issues on the draft merger agreement and Novartis to complete some additional due diligence. That evening, the parties and their respective financial and legal advisors made substantial progress in negotiating the terms of the merger agreement with the primary open issues relating to Chiron's request that Novartis be obligated to take any actions necessary in order to secure regulatory approval so long as such actions did not result in a material adverse effect on Novartis and its subsidiaries taken as a whole. Chiron's management responded to certain Novartis due diligence requests on October 29. When Novartis indicated on October 29 that its due diligence was substantially completed, representatives of Novartis' and Chiron's respective financial advisors met to explore whether an agreement could be reached on price. After Chiron's financial advisors reported to the non-Novartis directors present that Novartis' financial advisors told them that they did not believe that Novartis would increase its price beyond $44.00, the non-Novartis directors and their representatives suspended discussions for the evening.

        The non-Novartis directors met on the morning of October 30 for an update concerning the negotiations to date. Also attending this meeting were Ms. Hoover, Ms. Bartels and representatives of Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. A representative of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP discussed, among other things, the principal open contract issue—namely, Chiron's view that

9



Novartis should be obligated to take any necessary steps in order to secure regulatory approval so long as such actions did not result in a material adverse effect on Novartis and its subsidiaries taken as a whole. Following that meeting, the parties and their respective financial and legal advisors resumed discussions. The parties and their respective financial and legal advisors discussed potential resolution of the principal open contract issue, assuming an agreement were to be reached on price. During the course of those discussions, Chiron advised Novartis that it intended to exercise its right under the existing contractual arrangements between the companies to "put" $300 million of Chiron stock to Novartis to provide it with greater assurance that Novartis would have the maximum incentive to complete a transaction and additional capital in the event that for any reason a transaction did not close. The parties resolved the open contract issue by agreeing that Novartis would be required to take any actions necessary in order to secure regulatory approval so long as such actions did not result in a material adverse effect on Chiron and its subsidiaries taken as a whole.

        The parties' respective financial advisors continued their discussions on October 30 regarding Chiron's valuation. During the course of these discussions, Chiron's and Novartis' respective financial advisors considered whether their respective valuation analyses as of that date would be supportive of a valuation of Chiron of $45.00 per share and agreed to suggest that their respective clients consider that valuation. Later that day, Novartis raised its offer for the shares of Chiron common stock that it did not already own to $45.00 per share in cash.

        On October 30, 2005, the Chiron board, with the three designees of Novartis having recused themselves, met with Ms. Hoover, Ms. Bartels and representatives of Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. At this meeting, the non-Novartis directors reviewed the proposed $45.00 per share in cash and the other terms of the proposed definitive merger agreement with management and representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and received updated presentations from Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley. In addition, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley delivered their oral opinions, subsequently confirmed in writing as of that same date, that, as of that date, and based upon and subject to the various factors, assumptions and limitations set forth in their respective opinions and other factors that they deemed relevant, the merger consideration of $45.00 per share in cash to be paid to the holders of shares of Chiron common stock pursuant to the merger agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to Chiron's stockholders (other than Novartis and its subsidiaries in the case of Credit Suisse and other than holders of "excluded shares" in the case of Morgan Stanley). Based on all relevant factors they considered material, including, among other things, the opinions of the financial advisors and advice of legal counsel, the directors designated as "independent directors" pursuant to the governance agreement with Novartis approved the transaction with Novartis pursuant to the governance agreement recommending that the non-Novartis directors approve and declare advisable the merger agreement and, based on all relevant factors they considered material, including, among other things, the opinions of the financial advisors and advice of legal counsel, the non-Novartis directors approved the merger agreement and determined that the merger is advisable and is fair to and in the best interests of Chiron and its stockholders and determined to recommend that the stockholders of Chiron adopt the merger agreement. The Novartis designated directors on the Chiron board did not attend or participate in any of the board deliberations regarding the transaction.

        The merger agreement was signed and Chiron and Novartis issued respective press releases announcing the transaction on October 31, 2005.

Fairness of the Merger; Recommendation of the Non-Novartis Directors of Chiron's Board of Directors

        Chiron's board of directors excluding the Novartis directors believe that the merger is fair to and in the best interests of Chiron's stockholders, other than Novartis and its affiliates. At a meeting on October 30, 2005, all members of the Chiron board other than the Novartis directors who recused themselves, which we refer to in this section as the Chiron board, approved the merger agreement and authorized the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and recommend adoption of the

10



merger agreement by Chiron's stockholders. In reaching these conclusions, the Chiron board considered the following material factors, among others:

11


12


        The Chiron board also believed the process was fair because of, in addition to the factors above, the following:

13


        The Chiron board noted that Novartis had included in the merger agreement a condition that the merger agreement requires approval by shareholders representing a majority of Chiron's outstanding shares not owned by Novartis AG and its affiliates. Notwithstanding this, the Chiron board concluded that its fiduciary duties required them to make a determination as to whether the merger was fair to and in the best interests of Chiron and its stockholders.

        The Chiron board also considered the following adverse factors associated with the merger, among others:


        The Chiron board considered and adopted the valuation analyses presented by Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley in connection with their fairness opinions rendered on October 30, 2005. See "—Opinions of Chiron's Financial Advisors" for a description of these analyses. There have been no material events since October 30, 2005, the date of the opinions from Chiron's financial advisors, that, to the knowledge of Chiron management, would affect the fairness opinions. The Chiron board did not perform an analysis of net book value or liquidation value. Among other things, Chiron believes that net book value, which is an accounting concept, generally has no correlation to the fair value of a company's shares in the context of a sale of the company, although Chiron also notes that its net book value per share ($13.33 at September 30, 2005) is significantly lower than the $45.00 per share merger consideration. As to liquidation value, Chiron notes that in light of its (and, in the event the merger is completed, Novartis') intention to continue to operate Chiron's businesses, a liquidation of Chiron was not a viable option and, accordingly, a liquidation analysis would not be an appropriate or relevant means of measuring Chiron's value. For these reasons, among others, the Chiron board believed that the ranges of implied per share valuations generated by the valuation methodologies used by Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley were more reflective of the fair value of Chiron than Chiron's net book

14


value or any range of values that a liquidation analysis might have produced. For this reason, the Chiron board did not attribute importance to net book value or possible liquidation values. While the Chiron board does not believe there is a single method for determining "going concern value," it believes that each of the Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley valuation methodologies represented a valuation of Chiron as it continues to operate its business, and, to that extent, such analyses could collectively be characterized as forms of going concern valuations.

        In view of the large number of factors considered by the Chiron board in connection with the evaluation of the merger and the complexity of these matters, the Chiron board did not consider it practicable to, nor did they attempt to, quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors they considered in reaching their decision, nor did they evaluate whether these factors were of equal importance. In addition, each director may have given different weight to the various factors. The Chiron board held extensive discussions with, and relied on the experience and expertise of, the financial advisors with respect to the quantitative and qualitative analyses of the financial terms of the merger. The Chiron board conducted a discussion of, among other things, the factors described above, including asking questions of Chiron's management and the financial and legal advisors, and reached the conclusion that the merger was fair to and in the best interests of Chiron and its stockholders other than Novartis and its affiliates.

Novartis' Purpose and Reasons for the Merger

        The purpose of the merger is for Novartis to acquire the remaining equity interest in Chiron that Novartis AG and its subsidiaries do not already own. Following completion of the subscription rights on December 8, 2005, described in "—Transactions and Relationships Between Novartis and Chiron," Novartis Biotech acquired an additional 6,896,552 shares of Chiron common stock, increasing Novartis' aggregate ownership interest in Chiron to approximately 43.9% of Chiron's outstanding shares.

        Novartis, Chiron's largest shareholder, has had a sizeable investment in Chiron since 1994. Novartis saw in Chiron a possible strategic platform in the vaccines business. Following the suspension of Chiron's license to manufacture FLUVIRIN at its facility in Liverpool, England, Novartis considered how best to protect its investment in Chiron. After conducting due diligence and analyzing Chiron's situation, Novartis believed that Chiron would be better positioned to address the legal, regulatory and business issues that it was facing as a subsidiary of a larger company. While Novartis recognized the value of Chiron's presence in the attractive vaccine market, including the opportunity to address Avian influenza and potential flu outbreaks, Novartis believed that each of Chiron's three business units faced significant challenges. In biopharmaceuticals, Novartis noted that the success of Tifacogin was critical to the success of Chiron's biopharmaceutical unit and that commercialization of that product was not expected until 2008 at the earliest, would require significant time and expense and was subject to a high degree of uncertainty. Novartis also noted the FDA's recent determination not to approve Pulminiq without further clinical trial, which would result in significant additional costs and delay. Novartis further noted that the balance of the biopharmaceutical product pipeline was in early stages of development and subject to a high degree of uncertainty. With respect to Chiron's vaccines unit, Novartis was aware of Chiron's recent problems at its Liverpool, England and Marburg, Germany facilities and its ongoing remediation efforts, as well as Chiron's recent loss of market share to formidable competitors and the announcement by such competitors of planned increases in flu vaccine production capabilities. In addition, Novartis noted the significant risk associated with Chiron's obtaining regulatory approval and establishing manufacturing capabilities for the flu cell culture as well as the significant capital expenditures that would be required in connection with those activities. Finally, Novartis noted that the commercial opportunity for Chiron associated with any pandemic flu outbreak would be limited by Chiron's manufacturing capacity and the long lead times associated with egg-based flu production. As such, Novartis believed that Chiron's vaccines business would benefit from the merger. With respect to Chiron's blood testing business Novartis noted that it was experiencing

15



slower than historical growth, was facing the expiration of key patents, and was in need of greater research and development investment, including investment into next generation technology platforms. Novartis further believed that Chiron needed to strengthen management oversight and control over Chiron's wide-ranging operations spread across regions. Further, in light of Chiron's manufacturing problems, several of Chiron's key personnel were diverted from their regular duties in order to manage Chiron's remediation efforts. Novartis also believed that, without the resources of a much larger company and given the scope of Chiron's operations, Chiron was unable to invest appropriately into research and development. For example, products such as the meningitis ACWY vaccine suffered from inconsistent investment. Novartis believed that Chiron would be better positioned to deal each of these and other risks as a part of Novartis due to Novartis' industry-leading pharmaceutical research and development infrastructure, greater financial resources, experienced personnel and other resources, as well as Novartis' successful experience in integrating and managing a broad range of global business activities. These substantial resources would permit Chiron to leverage Novartis' research and development infrastructure to reallocate research and development investment from biopharmaceuticals to vaccines and blood testing as well as commit additional resources to Chiron's legal and regulatory compliance issues. In addition, as a subsidiary of a larger public company, Chiron would also be better able to focus on the long term health of its business free from many of the distractions and difficulties associated with being a public company.

        Novartis does not presently have any specific plans in the event the merger is unsuccessful but in such event would evaluate all of its options. See "Special Factors—Plans for Chiron After the Merger" on page 32.

Position of the Novartis Entities Regarding Fairness of Merger

        All of the members of the Novartis, Novartis Corporation and Novartis Biotech boards of directors have voted in favor of the merger. The Novartis entities—Novartis, Novartis Corporation and Novartis Biotech—each believe that the merger consideration is fair in terms of price to Chiron's unaffiliated security holders and that the procedure followed in reaching such price was also fair to those security holders. A central consideration to each of the Novartis entities in establishing the fairness of the merger is that, in addition to the approval of the merger by Chiron's board (with the Novartis directors having recused themselves) and Chiron's independent directors, as defined in the governance agreement, Novartis conditioned its proposal to acquire the publicly outstanding shares of Chiron's common stock on the proposal's receipt of the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares of Chiron's common stock held by shareholders other than Novartis and its affiliates.

        Each of the Novartis entities bases its belief on the following:

16


        In connection with its consideration of the Chiron transaction and in determining whether the merger was fair to Chiron's unaffiliated security holders, each of the Novartis entities considered the 52-week trading range of Chiron's shares, research analyst target prices for Chiron's shares, as well as ranges of implied transaction prices based on various premiums to the price of Chiron's shares. As a result of its due diligence, Novartis also developed detailed projections for Chiron's businesses. On a consolidated basis, these projections assumed that Chiron's revenues would grow at a 10% annual rate from 2005 to 2009 and that Chiron's operating margins would increase from 13% to 30% over the

17



same period. Novartis also projected that the transaction would generate $221 million in annual synergies by 2008. In connection with its consideration of the fairness of the merger, each of the Novartis entities further considered a discounted cash flow analysis based on these projections which yielded $33.50-$36.00 per share on a stand-alone basis (reflecting Chiron's value as a going concern) and $37.70-$40.20 per share factoring in 50% of anticipated synergies. In addition, Novartis considered the discounted cash flow value if 50% of anticipated synergies were to be spread only over Chiron's public shares which yielded $40.70 to $43.20 per share. In performing its discounted cash flow analysis, Novartis used a 10% discount rate and terminal value assumptions specific to each of Chiron's businesses. While each of the Novartis entities considered each of the above factors in determining that the merger was fair to Chiron's unaffiliated security holders, each of the Novartis entities considered the discounted cash flow analysis as the methodology yielding the most meaningful valuation. The Novartis entities did not believe that alternative comparable companies and comparable transactions valuation methodologies were relevant in light of Chiron's unusual and adverse events which impacted the 2004 and 2005 financial results.

        In connection with its role as financial advisor to Novartis, Goldman Sachs prepared discussion materials for the purposes of assisting Novartis in its preparation of its financial analysis described in the above paragraph and in preparation for negotiations with Chiron. These materials included analyses of the trading ranges of Chiron shares, analyses of premiums paid in transactions involving companies in Chiron's industry and going-private transactions, and research analyst target prices. Goldman Sachs' discussion materials also included a valuation of Chiron, using a discounted cash flow analysis, that yielded $33.50-$36.00 per share on a stand-alone basis, $37.70-$40.20 per share factoring in 50% of anticipated synergies spread across all of Chiron's outstanding shares, and $41.00-$43.50 factoring in 50% of anticipated synergies spread only over Chiron's public shares. Each of the discounted cash flow analyses performed by Goldman Sachs was based upon projections of Chiron's future cash flows prepared by Novartis management as described in the above paragraph, which included certain cost savings and operating synergies projected by Novartis management to result from the transaction. In performing its discounted cash flow analysis, Goldman used a 10% discount rate and terminal value assumptions specific to each of Chiron's businesses. None of the analyses performed by Goldman Sachs, alone or together, constitute an opinion of Goldman Sachs with respect to the fairness of the consideration to be paid to Chiron stockholders. The discussion materials prepared by Goldman Sachs, which include the discounted cash flow analyses and other analyses referred to above, have been filed as an exhibit to the Schedule 13E-3 filed by Chiron and the Novartis entities in connection with the merger.

        Goldman Sachs relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial, accounting, legal, tax and other information discussed with or reviewed by it and assumed such accuracy and completeness for purposes of performing its financial analyses. Novartis engaged Goldman Sachs to act as its financial advisor because it is an internationally recognized investment banking firm that has substantial experience in transactions similar to the merger. Goldman Sachs and its affiliates, as part of their investment banking business, are continually engaged in performing financial analyses with respect to businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and other transactions as well as for estate, corporate and other purposes. Goldman Sachs has provided certain investment banking and other services to Novartis from time to time. Goldman Sachs also may provide investment banking services to Novartis in the future. In connection with the above-described investment banking and other services Goldman Sachs has received, and may receive, compensation. Goldman Sachs is a full service securities firm engaged, either directly or indirectly through its affiliates, in securities trading, investment management, financial planning and benefits counseling, risk management, hedging, financing and brokerage activities for both companies and individuals. In the ordinary course of these activities, Goldman Sachs and its affiliates may provide such services to Novartis, Chiron and their respective affiliates, may actively trade the debt and equity securities (or

18



related derivative securities) of Novartis and Chiron for their own account and for the accounts of their customers and may at any time hold long and short positions of such securities.

        Pursuant to an engagement letter dated as of August 31, 2005, Novartis retained Goldman Sachs to assist it with negotiating and analyzing a potential transaction with Chiron. Goldman Sachs was not engaged to, nor did it, render any opinion as to the fairness of the transaction either to Novartis or to Chiron or either of their respective stockholders. Pursuant to the terms of the engagement letter, Novartis has agreed to pay Goldman Sachs customary fees for its services in connection with the engagement. In addition, Novartis has agreed to reimburse Goldman Sachs for its expenses, including attorneys' fees and disbursements, and to indemnify Goldman Sachs and related persons against various liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities laws.

        Except as described above regarding the conditioning of the merger on approval of a majority of the public shares of Chiron's common stock, none of the Novartis entities found it practicable to assign, nor did they assign, relative weights to the individual factors considered in reaching their conclusion as to fairness. In light of market valuation measures and the nature of Chiron's business and assets, none of the Novartis entities deemed net book value or liquidation value to be relevant indicators of the value of the shares of Chiron's common stock. None of the Novartis entities considered the purchase prices paid by the Novartis entities in prior acquisitions of Chiron common stock relevant in determining the fairness of the merger to Chiron's unaffiliated security holders. None of the Novartis entities were aware of any firm offers by any other person during the prior two years for a merger or consolidation of Chiron with another company, the sale or transfer of all or substantially all of Chiron's assets, or a purchase of Chiron's securities that would enable such person to exercise control of Chiron.

        The Novartis entities believe the above analyses and factors provide a reasonable basis upon which to form their belief that the merger is fair to Chiron's unaffiliated security holders. This belief should not, however, be construed as a recommendation to any Chiron shareholder to approve the merger agreement. The Novartis entities do not make any recommendation as to how Chiron shareholders should vote their shares relating to the merger or any related transaction.

        Chiron has been informed that each of the Novartis entities and all of their directors and executive officers currently holding shares of Chiron's common stock intend to vote such shares of Chiron's common stock in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement because they believe the merger is fair in terms of price and process.

Chiron Agreement with Schering AG Relating to Betaseron®

        Chiron is a party to a Regulatory Filing, Development and Supply Agreement with Schering AG, dated as of May 10, 1993, as amended, providing for the manufacture by Chiron and the marketing by Schering, of Betaseron®, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 10.203 of Chiron's report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 1998. The Schering agreement contains a change of control provision granting Schering the option to acquire or lease, at fair market value, all of the property, contracts, facilities and equipment of Chiron used in the manufacture of Betaseron in the event of a change of control of Chiron. BETASERON®, or BETAFERON® in Europe, product revenues recognized under this agreement constituted 11%, 11% and 13% of Chiron's consolidated total revenues in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

        Pursuant to the terms of the Schering agreement, on December 1, 2005 Chiron notified Schering that a change of control may occur as a result of the completion of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Pursuant to the Schering agreement, Schering has 90 days from December 1, 2005 to notify Chiron if it will exercise its option to acquire or lease the BETASERON® business at fair market value. Chiron does not know at this time whether Schering will exercise its option.

        Novartis was aware of the change of control provision in the Schering agreement. However, because the provision provides that the acquisition or lease by Schering of the Betaseron business must be at fair market value, Novartis did not assign a positive or negative value to the existence of the clause in to its financial analysis.

19


Opinions of Chiron's Financial Advisors

        Chiron retained Credit Suisse to act as its financial advisor in connection with the merger. In connection with Credit Suisse's engagement, Chiron requested that Credit Suisse evaluate the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger consideration to be received in the merger by holders of Chiron common stock, other than Novartis and its subsidiaries. At the October 30, 2005, meeting of the Chiron board of directors (with the Novartis directors having recused themselves) Credit Suisse reviewed with the Chiron board of directors certain financial analyses, as described below, and rendered its oral opinion to the Chiron board of directors, subsequently confirmed in writing, that, as of October 30, 2005 and based upon and subject to the various considerations set forth in the Credit Suisse opinion, the merger consideration to be received in the merger by holders of Chiron common stock, other than Novartis AG and its subsidiaries, was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.

        The full text of the Credit Suisse opinion, which sets forth, among other things, assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the scope of the review undertaken by Credit Suisse in rendering its opinion, is attached as Annex B to this proxy statement and is incorporated by reference in its entirety. Chiron stockholders are urged to, and should, read the Credit Suisse opinion carefully and in its entirety. The Credit Suisse opinion addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger consideration to be received in the merger by holders of Chiron common stock, other than Novartis and its subsidiaries, as of the date of the Credit Suisse opinion, and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote or act on any matter relating to the merger.

        In connection with its opinion, Credit Suisse, among other things,

        In connection with its review, Credit Suisse did not assume any responsibility for independent verification of any of the foregoing information and relied on such information being complete and accurate in all material respects. With respect to the financial forecasts of Chiron that Credit Suisse reviewed, the management of Chiron advised Credit Suisse, and Credit Suisse assumed, that such forecasts had been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the management of Chiron as to the future financial performance of Chiron.

        Credit Suisse also assumed, with Chiron's consent, that in the course of obtaining any necessary regulatory or third party consents, approvals or other agreements for the merger, no modification, delay, limitation, restriction or condition will be imposed that will have an adverse effect on Chiron or the merger and that the merger will be consummated in accordance with the terms of the merger

20



agreement, without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term, condition or agreement contained in the merger agreement. Credit Suisse was not requested to make, and did not make, an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Chiron, nor was Credit Suisse furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals. The Credit Suisse opinion addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Chiron common stock, other than Novartis and its subsidiaries, of the merger consideration to be received in the merger and does not address any other aspect or implication of the merger or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding entered into in connection with the merger or otherwise. The Credit Suisse opinion is necessarily based upon information made available to it as of the date of its opinion, and upon financial, economic, market and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated on the date of the Credit Suisse opinion. The Credit Suisse opinion does not address the relative merits of the merger as compared to other business strategies that might be available to Chiron, nor does it address the underlying business decision of Chiron to proceed with the merger. Credit Suisse was not requested to, and did not, solicit third party indications of interest in acquiring all or any part of Chiron.

        Chiron engaged Credit Suisse to act as a financial advisor based on its qualifications, experience, reputation and knowledge of the business of Chiron. Credit Suisse is an internationally recognized investment banking firm and is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes. From time to time, Credit Suisse and its affiliates in the past have provided, currently are providing and in the future may provide investment banking and other financial services to Chiron, Novartis Corporation and Novartis unrelated to the proposed merger, for which services Credit Suisse has received, and would expect to receive, compensation. Credit Suisse is a full service securities firm engaged in securities trading and brokerage activities as well as providing investment banking and other financial services. In the ordinary course of business, Credit Suisse and its affiliates may acquire, hold or sell, for their own accounts and for the accounts of customers, equity, debt and other securities and financial instruments (including bank loans and other obligations) of Chiron, Novartis Corporation, Novartis and any other entities that may be involved in the merger and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities, as well as provide investment banking and other financial services to such companies.

        Pursuant to an engagement letter dated as of April 15, 2005, Chiron engaged Credit Suisse to provide financial advisory services to the Chiron board of directors in connection with the merger, including, among other things, rendering its opinion. Pursuant to the terms of the engagement letter, Chiron has agreed to pay Credit Suisse a transaction fee of approximately $10.2 million, $2.25 million of which was paid or is currently payable to Credit Suisse and the remainder of which shall be payable upon the closing of the merger. In addition, Chiron has agreed to reimburse Credit Suisse for its out-of-pocket expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred in connection with its engagement and to indemnify Credit Suisse and certain related persons against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of or in conjunction with its rendering of services under its engagement, including liabilities arising under the federal securities laws.

        Pursuant to an engagement letter, dated April 15, 2005, Chiron retained Morgan Stanley to act as a financial advisor to the board of directors of Chiron in connection with a potential transaction involving Chiron. Chiron selected Morgan Stanley to act as its financial advisor based on its qualifications, experience, reputation and knowledge of the business of Chiron. At the October 30, 2005 meeting of the Chiron board of directors (with the Novartis directors having recused themselves), Morgan Stanley rendered its oral opinion, which was subsequently confirmed in writing as of the same date, that, based upon and subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth in its

21


opinion, the merger consideration to be received by the holders of shares of Chiron common stock pursuant to the merger agreement was fair from a financial point of view to such holders other than Novartis and its subsidiaries, Chiron and its subsidiaries and any stockholders exercising their appraisal rights under Delaware law (referred to as holders of "Excluded Shares" in the merger agreement).

        The full text of Morgan Stanley's opinion, dated October 30, 2005, which sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and qualifications and limitations of the reviews undertaken in rendering its opinion, is attached as Annex C to this document. You should read the opinion carefully and in its entirety. Morgan Stanley's opinion is directed to the board of directors of Chiron, addresses only the fairness from a financial point of view of the merger consideration to be received by holders of Chiron common stock, other than Novartis and its subsidiaries and other holders of Excluded Shares, in accordance with the merger agreement, and does not address any other aspect of the merger. Morgan Stanley's opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder of Chiron as to how such stockholder should vote or act on any matter with respect to the proposed merger.

        In connection with rendering its opinion, Morgan Stanley, among other things:


        In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Stanley assumed and relied upon without independent verification the accuracy and completeness of the information supplied or otherwise made available to it by Chiron for the purposes of its opinion. With respect to the financial projections, Morgan Stanley assumed that they were reasonably prepared on basis reflecting the then best currently available estimates and judgments of the future financial performance of Chiron. Morgan Stanley assumed that the merger would be consummated in accordance with the terms set forth in the merger agreement without material modification, waiver or delay. In addition, Morgan Stanley did not express any opinion as to any tax or other consequences that may result from the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, nor did Morgan Stanley's opinion address any legal, tax, regulatory or accounting matters, as to which Morgan Stanley understood Chiron had received such advice as it deemed necessary from qualified professionals. Morgan Stanley did not make any independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of Chiron nor was Morgan Stanley furnished with any such valuations or appraisals.

22


Morgan Stanley's opinion was necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to it as of, October 30, 2005. Morgan Stanley's opinion did not address the underlying business decision by Chiron to enter into the merger agreement or the relative merits of the merger compared to other alternatives available to Chiron, or whether such alternatives existed.

        In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Stanley was not authorized to solicit, and it did not solicit, interest from any party with respect to any acquisition, business combination or other extraordinary transaction involving Chiron.

        Morgan Stanley is an internationally recognized investment banking and advisory firm. Morgan Stanley, as part of its investment banking business, is continuously engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for corporate, estate and other purposes. In the ordinary course of its business, Morgan Stanley and its affiliates may from time to time trade in the securities or the indebtedness of Chiron, Novartis and their affiliates for its own account, the accounts of investment funds and other clients under the management of Morgan Stanley and for the accounts of its customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities or indebtedness for any such account. In the past, Morgan Stanley and its affiliates have provided financial advisory and financing services for both Chiron and Novartis and have received fees for the rendering of these services. In addition, in the future, Morgan Stanley may provide, or seek to provide, financial advice and financing services to Novartis and its subsidiaries.

        Chiron has agreed to pay Morgan Stanley a transaction fee of approximately $10.2 million, $2.25 million of which was paid or is payable to Morgan Stanley and the remainder of which shall be payable upon the closing of the merger. Chiron has also agreed to reimburse Morgan Stanley for its fees and expenses incurred in performing its services. In addition, Chiron has agreed to indemnify Morgan Stanley and its affiliates, their respective directors, officers, agents and employees and each person, if any, controlling Morgan Stanley or any of its affiliates against certain liabilities and expenses, including certain liabilities under the federal securities laws, related to or arising out of Morgan Stanley's engagement and any related transactions.

        The following is a summary of the material financial analyses presented to the Chiron board of directors on October 30, 2005 which underlie the opinions of Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley delivered to the Chiron board of directors on October 30, 2005. Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley also provided the Chiron board of directors with similar preliminary analyses on May 20, 2005, September 4, 2005 and October 18, 2005, in each case based on the most current information then available to them at the time of the presentation and each of which is briefly described under "—Other Written Presentations." However, these earlier preliminary presentations were not presented in connection with, and do not underlie, the opinions of either Credit Suisse or Morgan Stanley. The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand Credit Suisse's and Morgan Stanley's financial analyses, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Considering the data in the tables below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of Credit Suisse's and Morgan Stanley's financial analyses.

        In preparing their respective opinions to the Chiron board of directors, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley collaborated to perform a variety of financial and comparative analyses. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and

23


relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore, a fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. In arriving at their respective opinions, each of Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley independently made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor that it considered. Accordingly, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley believe that their analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of their analyses and factors or focusing on information presented in tabular format, without considering all analyses and factors or the narrative description of the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying their analyses and opinions.

        In their analyses, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley considered industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of Chiron, such as the impact of competition on the business of Chiron and on the industry generally, industry growth and the absence of any material adverse change in the financial condition and prospects of Chiron or the industry or in the markets generally. No company, transaction or business used in Credit Suisse's and Morgan Stanley's analyses as a comparison is identical to Chiron or the proposed merger. In addition, each of Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley may have given various analyses more or less weight than other analyses, and may have deemed various assumptions more or less probable than other assumptions, so that the range of valuation resulting from any particular analysis described below should not be taken to be Credit Suisse's or Morgan Stanley's view of the actual value of Chiron. An evaluation of the results of those analyses is not entirely mathematical. Rather, the analyses involved complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could affect the merger, public trading or other values of Chiron, business segments or transactions analyzed. The estimates contained in the analyses of Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley and the ranges of valuations resulting from any particular analysis are not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future results or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by the analyses. In addition, analyses relating to the value of businesses or assets do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which businesses or assets actually may be sold. Accordingly, the analyses and estimates of Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty. The analyses performed were prepared solely as part of Credit Suisse's and Morgan Stanley's analyses of the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger consideration to be received in the merger by holders of Chiron common stock, other than Novartis and its subsidiaries and in the case of Morgan Stanley's opinion other holders of Excluded Shares, and were provided to the board of directors of Chiron in connection with the delivery of their respective opinions.

        The opinions of Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley were only one of many factors considered by the Chiron board of directors in its evaluation of the proposed merger and should not be viewed as determinative of the views of the Chiron board of directors or management with respect to the merger or the consideration to be received in accordance with the merger agreement.

        Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley reviewed and analyzed certain public market trading multiples for public companies similar to Chiron from a size and business mix perspective. The multiples analyzed for these comparable companies included, among others, the per share price divided by 2006 and 2007 estimated earnings per share (which Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley referred to as a P/E multiple) and the long-term earnings per share growth rate. The earnings per share estimates were based on management estimates and on First Call estimates for Chiron and on Institutional Brokers' Estimate System, or I/B/E/S, consensus estimates for the selected companies. Long-term earnings per share growth rates for the selected companies were based on I/B/E/S consensus estimates. Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley calculated these financial multiples based on publicly available financial data as of

24


October 30, 2005. Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley determined that no company was completely "comparable" to Chiron based on its industry, financial and operational profile and business mix. Therefore, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley looked at (i) select large capitalization biotechnology companies, (ii) select biotechnology companies, (iii) select companies that have biopharmaceutical and blood testing businesses, (iv) select companies that have biopharmaceutical and vaccines businesses, (v) select blood testing companies and (vi) select vaccines companies. The following charts identify the companies in each of these categories selected by Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley and also set forth the estimated calendar year 2006 and 2007 P/E multiples and long-term earnings per share growth rates for each of these companies, as well as the mean and median estimated calendar 2006 and 2007 P/E multiples and long-term earnings per share growth rate for each of the category groups. Reference in the charts to "NM" means "not meaningful."

Large Cap Biotech Companies

Company

  2006 P/E
  2007 P/E
  Long-term Growth Rate
Amgen Inc.   20.7x   18.5x   16.2%
Biogen Idec Inc.   19.5x   17.9x   14.2%
Celgene Corporation   54.0x   36.4x   47.5%
Genentech, Inc.   49.0x   37.2x   33.4%
Genzyme Corporation   26.2x   23.3x   19.2%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.   26.3x   24.2x   19.5%
MidImmune Inc.   74.4x   47.8x   24.5%
  Mean   38.6x   29.3x   24.9%
  Median   26.3x   24.2x   19.5%
Biotechnology Companies

Company

  2006 P/E
  2007 P/E
  Long-term Growth Rate
Allergan Inc.   23.6x   20.1x   17.5%
Biogen Idec Inc.   19.5x   17.9x   14.2%
Celgene Corporation   54.0x   36.4x   47.5%
Cephalon, Inc.   14.5x   13.2x   19.4%
Elan Corporation plc   NM   NM   15.8%
Forest Laboratories, Inc.   14.5x   12.4x   13.0%
Genzyme Corporation   26.2x   23.3x   19.2%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.   26.3x   24.2x   19.5%
MidImmune Inc.   74.4x   47.8x   24.5%
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.   NM   NM   15.0%
Serono S.A   15.5x   13.6x   18.0%
  Mean   29.8x   23.2x   20.3%
  Median   23.6x   20.1x   18.0%

25


Biopharmaceutical and Blood Testing and
Biopharmaceutical and Vaccines Companies

Biopharmaceutical and Blood
Testing Company

  2006 P/E
  2007 P/E
  Long-term Growth Rate
Abbott Laboratories   15.9x   14.1x   9.5%
Bayer AG   12.3x   15.4x   7.0%
Johnson & Johnson   16.7x   15.2x   11.1%
Roche Holding Ltd.   24.5x   19.7x   14.3%

Biopharmaceutical and Vaccines
Company


 

 


 

 


 

 


GlaxoSmithKline plc

 

17.2x

 

15.6x

 

6.1%
MidImmune Inc.   74.4x   47.8x   24.5%
Merck & Co., Inc.   11.5x   11.4x   14.5%
Sanofi Aventis   13.3x   11.8x   9.5%
Wyeth   14.2x   13.3x   7.4%
  Mean   22.2x   18.0x   11.5%
  Median   16.3x   15.3x   10.3%
Blood Testing Companies

Company

  2006 P/E
  2007 P/E
  Long-term Growth Rate
Beckman Coulter, Inc.   16.1x   13.7x   14.1%
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.   15.5x   NM   10.0%
Biosite, Inc.   17.3x   16.6x   15.8%
Cytyc Corporation   20.7x   16.7x   18.9%
Dade Behring Holdings Inc.   23.9x   22.8x   17.8%
Digene Corporation   40.1x   20.4x   30.0%
Diagnostic Products Corporation   14.7x   12.6x   17.4%
Gen-Probe Incorporated   28.3x   22.7x   21.6%
Immucor, Inc.   21.8x   NM   23.3%
Tripath Imaging Inc.   28.4x   9.5x   37.5%
Ventana Medical System, Inc.   36.0x   25.8x   26.2%
  Mean   23.9x   17.9x   21.1%
  Median   21.8x   16.7x   18.9%
Vaccine Companies

Company

  2006 P/E
  2007 P/E
  Long-term Growth Rate
Acambis plc   NM   NM   NM
Berna Biotechnology AG   51.0x   NM   3.0%
CSL Limited   18.6x   NM   16.4%
Nabi Biopharmaceuticals Inc.   NM   NM   NM
  Mean   34.8x   NM   9.7%
  Median   34.8x   NM   9.7%

        In reviewing these companies, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley concluded that P/E multiples of 20.0x to 26.0x for 2006 and 18.0x to 24.0x for 2007 were the appropriate ranges in valuing Chiron. The financial advisors concluded that this range was appropriate based on their analysis of each of the companies considered and their similarity to Chiron. In particular, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley determined that Amgen Inc., Biogen Idec Inc., Genzyme Corporation and Gilead Sciences, Inc. had product, business and growth characteristics most comparable to Chiron's. Using Chiron's forecast

26



adjusted earnings per share of $1.58 for 2006 and $1.91 for 2007, and consensus Wall Street equity analyst forecast adjusted earnings per share for Chiron of $1.81 for 2006 and $1.98 for 2007, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley calculated the implied valuation ranges for Chiron as set forth in the following chart based on Chiron management's financial forecasts (which are referred to as Company Forecasts) and Wall Street research analyst forecasts (which are referred to as Analyst Forecasts):

 
  2006 P/E Multiple:
20.0x - 26.0x

  2007 P/E Multiple:
18.0x - 24.0x

Company Forecast   $31.60 - $41.08   $34.38 - $45.84

Analyst Forecast

 

$36.20 - $47.06

 

$35.64 - $47.52

        "Adjusted" earnings per share amounts excluded amortization expense on acquired intangible assets related to historical acquisitions Chiron has made. Although the foregoing companies were considered for purposes of this analysis, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley noted that no specific company utilized in this analysis is identical to Chiron because of differences between the business mix, regulatory environment, operations and other characteristics of Chiron and the selected companies. Mathematical analysis, such as determining the mean or median, is not in itself a meaningful method of using comparable company data.

        Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley performed a discounted cash flow analysis, calculated as of September 30, 2005, of Chiron after-tax unlevered free cash flows for 2005 through 2015, based on the financial forecasts and estimates provided by Chiron management. Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley estimated a range of terminal values based on 2015 cash flows. These terminal values were based on a perpetual growth rate range of 2.0% to 4.0%. Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley discounted the unlevered free cash flow streams and the estimated terminal value to a present value at a discount rate of 10.0% to 12.0% for each case. The valuations of these cash flow streams were made as of September 30, 2005 assuming mid-period convention, and the discount rates utilized in this analysis were chosen based upon an analysis of the weighted average cost of capital of Chiron and other comparable companies. For this purpose, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley used the companies reviewed in the selected company analysis described above other than the companies listed under the Blood Testing and the Vaccines category.

The median and mean weighted average cost of capital for each of these categories, as well as the combined median and mean, were as follows:

Category

  Median
  Mean
Large Cap Biotech Companies   13.0%   13.4%
Biopharmaceutical and Blood Testing Companies   8.9%   8.9%
Biopharmaceutical and Vaccines Companies   8.6%   9.5%
Biotechnology Companies   12.9%   12.8%
Combined   12.1%   11.7%

Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley eliminated the companies in the Blood Testing only and Vaccines only categories from the weighted average cost of capital review because vaccine only companies tended not to have meaningful earnings and blood testing only companies had business models which were different from Chiron's and the other companies in the categories examined by Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley.

These companies were selected because the financial advisors judged them to be most similar to Chiron in size of commercial operations, business mix and maturity and focus of research and development efforts. The financial advisors determined the discount rate range and growth rate range for this

27



analysis by considering the mean and median weighted average cost of capital for each of these company groupings and on a combined overall basis. The weighted average cost of capital is a measure of the average expected return on all of a given company's equity securities or debt based on their proportions in such company's capital structure. Based on the aforementioned projections and assumptions, the discounted cash flow analysis of Chiron yielded an implied valuation range of Chiron common stock of $35.93 to $55.33.

        Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley also performed a discounted cash flow analysis of Chiron focusing only on its individual BioPharma, Vaccines, Blood Testing and Corporate Royalties segments. Based on the financial forecasts and estimates provided by Chiron management, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley performed a discounted cash-flow analysis calculated as of September 30, 2005, of the after-tax unlevered free cash flows for 2005 through 2015 derived from each of these business lines. Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley discounted the expected unlevered free cash flow streams at a discount rate of 10.0% to 12.0% for each business and a perpetual growth rate of 1.0% to 3.0% for BioPharma, 2.0% to 4.0% for each of Vaccines and Blood Testing and negative 2.0% to 0% for Corporate Royalties. The discount rate range was selected based on Chiron's 10.9% weighted average cost of capital, and the combined median and mean weighted average cost of capital for the companies identified above under "Discounted Cash Flow Analysis—Chiron Consolidated." Based on the aforementioned projections and assumptions, the discounted cash flow analysis of Chiron yielded an implied valuation range of Chiron common stock of $34.29 to $53.15. In calculating the growth rates identified above, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley considered the growth rates of Chiron in the last years of the periods covered by the Company Forecasts and in particular considered the potential of new product introductions and forecast research and development spending during those years.

        The discounted cash flow model is based upon, among other things, Chiron management forecasts of various contingencies with respect to the Chiron portfolio. Using the midpoint of the ranges of the perpetual growth rates and discount rates selected by Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley, those forecasts yield an implied value of the Chiron common stock of $43.53 per share, which we refer to as the "base value." For the information of the Chiron board of directors, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley presented a sensitivity analysis intended to demonstrate how changes in certain of those forecasts, while holding the other variables constant, could affect the base value of the Chiron common stock. A summary of the results of this sensitivity analysis is set forth below:

28


        Notwithstanding the fact that that it was not part of the valuation criteria utilized by Credit Suisse or Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley provided the Chiron board with additional background information and perspective with respect to the prices paid by acquirors in certain other precedent transactions. Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley reviewed and compared the proposed financial terms and the premium implied in the merger to corresponding publicly available financial terms and premia of selected precedent transactions involving biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies. In selecting these transactions Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley reviewed transactions announced from March 2000 to October 31, 2005. Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley noted that a comparison of the premia paid in other transactions was likely to be misleading due to the fact that trading in the Chiron shares since September 1, 2005 was likely to reflect market expectations as to what Novartis might pay for the shares it did not already own. Furthermore, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley clearly noted that this comparison was not part of the valuation criteria utilized by Credit Suisse or Morgan Stanley because it was not based on criteria intrinsic to Chiron.

        In the course of preparing their respective opinions, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley also reviewed and considered other information and data, including:

        In June 2004, Credit Suisse acted as co-lead initial purchaser of convertible debt securities issued by Chiron pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. Credit Suisse earned approximately $3.58 million in connection with this prior engagement. Credit Suisse has also provided in the past two years and is currently providing investment banking and other financial services to Novartis and its affiliates including, among other things, strategic advisory services in connection with mergers and acquisitions and financing services involving equity financings, share buybacks, derivatives, debt financings and monetization of select investments. Credit Suisse has earned approximately $3.45 million in connection with these prior and current engagements. Except for those fees, and the fees paid and payable to Credit Suisse in connection with the proposed transaction, Credit Suisse has not received any fees from Chiron or its affiliates in the past two years.

        In June 2004, Morgan Stanley acted as co-lead initial purchaser of convertible debt securities issued by Chiron pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act. Morgan Stanley earned approximately $3.58 million in connection with this prior engagement. Except for those fees, and the fees paid and payable to Morgan Stanley in connection with the proposed transaction, Morgan Stanley has not received any fees from Chiron or its affiliates in the past two years.

29



Other Written Presentations

        As described under "—Background of the Merger," Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley made presentations to the non-Novartis directors on May 20, 2005, September 4, 2005 and October 18, 2005. Each such presentation has been filed as an exhibit to the Schedule 13E-3 filed by Chiron and the Novartis entities with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with this transaction. None of these presentations by Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley, alone or together, constitute an opinion of Credit Suisse or Morgan Stanley with respect to the fairness of the consideration to be received by the Chiron stockholders.

        The May 20, 2005 presentation materials included an overview of Chiron's business and trading performance, information with respect to research analyst reports for Chiron, selected financial analyses and a brief discussion of possible strategic alternatives. The September 4, 2005 presentation included a summary of events related to the proposed transaction that had occurred to date, an overview of Chiron's business and trading performance and selected financial analyses. The October 18, 2005 presentation consisted only of an overview of trading performance and selected financial analyses. For each of the May 20, 2005, September 4, 2005 and October 18, 2005, the financial analyses included in the presentation materials were equivalent in all material respects to those described above under "—Opinion of Chiron's Financial Advisors," consisting of:

Unlike the financial analyses included in the September 4, 2005, October 18, 2005 and October 31, 2005 presentation materials, the financial analyses included in the May 20, 2005 presentation were based solely on management projections, and not First Call or other third party research projections. In addition, the analyses in the May 20, 2005, September 4, 2005 and October 18, 2005 presentation materials were based on economic and other information as available as of the respective dates of those materials; this included, among other things, the multiples attributable to comparable companies that changed as their stock prices changed. The discounted cash flow analyses included in the October 30, 2005 written materials discounted the present value of the relevant cash flows back to September 30, 2005, while the October 18, 2005 and September 4, 2005 written materials discounted the cash flows back to June 30, 2005. Finally, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley continued to refine various aspects of their financial analyses with respect to Chiron over time, but Chiron does not believe that any such changes caused the financial analyses in the earlier presentations to materially differ from those underlying the opinions of the financial advisors and described under "—Opinion of Chiron's Financial Advisors."

Certain Slides Prepared by Financial Advisors

        In September 2005, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley prepared slides at the request of Chiron management that provided an update on the status of discussions with Goldman Sachs, outlined possible alternatives Novartis might take with respect to a possible transaction and included information on the possible financial impact on Novartis of an acquisition of Chiron, including information on Chiron's expected operating expenses and the illustrative financial impact on Novartis assuming a reduction of certain of those operating expenses in such an acquisition. These materials were not part of the financial analyses prepared by Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley in connection with their fairness opinions and, while the slides were provided to Chiron management and the concepts contained in the slides were generally discussed with the Chiron board of directors, the slides

30



were not provided to the Chiron board of directors. These materials have been filed as an exhibit to the Schedule 13E-3 filed by Chiron and the Novartis entities in connection with this transaction.

Certain Effects of the Merger

        The merger will result in Novartis indirectly owning 100% of the shares of Chiron common stock and Chiron becoming an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Novartis. The merger will also have the following effects:

31


Plans for Chiron After the Merger

        In connection with the merger, Novartis has reviewed and will continue to review various possible business strategies with respect to Chiron. If the merger is successful, Novartis will make decisions regarding Chiron's business, operations, personnel, employee benefit plans, corporate structure, capitalization and management as it determines appropriate at such time.

        Although Novartis will continue to review its plans with respect to Chiron, Novartis intends to integrate Chiron's biopharmaceutical business into Novartis' Pharma division and exploit potential opportunities for geographical expansion. With respect to Chiron's vaccines business, Novartis intends to dedicate resources to research and development and manufacturing to increase the quality and capacity of the vaccines business to better meet customer demand and address public health needs and expand Chiron's position as a global leader in vaccines; this will also likely include geographic expansion. Novartis may also expand the vaccine business into therapeutic and cancer vaccines. However, in the short term, Novartis intends to focus on quality assurance and processes and procedures. Novartis intends to retain Chiron's diagnostics business and combine it with the vaccines business into a new reporting division. It is possible that the diagnostics business will expand into molecular diagnostics.

Conduct of Business of Chiron if the Merger is not Completed

        In the event that the merger agreement is not adopted by Chiron's stockholders or if the merger is not completed for any other reason, Chiron stockholders will not receive any payment for their shares in connection with the merger. Instead, Chiron will remain an independent public company, its common stock will continue to be listed and traded on the Nasdaq and Chiron stockholders will continue to be subject to the same risks and opportunities as they currently have with respect to their ownership of Chiron common stock. If the merger is not completed, there can be no assurance as to the effect of these risks and opportunities on the future value of your Chiron shares, including the risk that the market price of our common stock may decline to the extent that the current market price of

32



our stock reflects a market assumption that the merger will be completed. Our board did not determine to put Chiron up for sale and has not considered alternatives to the merger, but may from time to time seek to identify strategic alternatives to maximize stockholder value. However, our board recognized that there would be a limited universe of buyers interested in all of Chiron's three diverse businesses. If the merger agreement is not adopted by Chiron's stockholders or if the merger is not completed for any other reason, there can be no assurance that any other transaction acceptable to Chiron will be offered whether by Novartis or another person, or even if offered by another person, that Novartis, as a 43.9% stockholder of Chiron, would support it. Further, Novartis has previously stated that it has no intention of selling its Chiron shares. If the merger is not completed, the governance agreement between Chiron and Novartis will continue in effect. See "—Transactions and Relationships Between Novartis and Chiron—Relationship with Novartis AG."

        On October 30, 2005, Chiron gave notice to Novartis that it was exercising its right under the subscription agreement, dated as of November 20, 1994 and amended from time to time, among Chiron, Novartis AG and its subsidiaries to require Novartis (or its affiliate) to purchase shares of Chiron common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $300 million at $43.50 per share, which is equivalent to 6,896,552 shares. Chiron and Novartis Biotech consummated the acquisition of these shares on December 8, 2005 and as a result Novartis increased its ownership in our company from approximately 42.1% to approximately 43.9%. Novartis also has the right to acquire a number of publicly outstanding shares of or a number of newly issued Chiron shares at a market price to bring Novartis' ownership to up to 55%. See "—Transactions and Relationships Between Novartis and Chiron—Relationship with Novartis AG."

        In the event the merger agreement is not adopted by Chiron's stockholders or if the merger is not completed for any other reason, the governance agreement between Chiron and Novartis will continue to require Novartis' approval to a number of corporate transactions. For more information on these provisions of the governance agreement, see "—Transactions and Relationships Between Novartis and Chiron—Relationship with Novartis AG."

Interests of Chiron's Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger

        Some of Chiron's directors and executive officers have interests in the merger that are different from, or are in addition to, their interests as stockholders. The non-Novartis directors were aware of these additional interests and considered them when they approved the merger agreement. These interests include the following:

        Pursuant to the merger agreement, all unvested options will become fully vested and each option to purchase shares of Chiron's common stock outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the merger will be cancelled and converted into a right to receive a cash amount, without interest, equal to the total number of shares subject to the option multiplied by the excess if any, of $45.00, over the exercise price per share subject to the option, less any applicable taxes. The aggregate amount payable to all executive officers and directors as a group with respect to their currently vested options would be $11,336,852, less applicable tax withholdings. Chiron's directors do not own any unvested options. The

33


aggregate amount payable to each executive officer as a result of the vesting and cancellation of currently unvested options, less applicable tax withholdings, would be:

Director/
Executive Officer

  Unvested
Stock Options

Ursula B. Bartels   $ 562,950
Jack Goldstein   $ 2,283,053
Anne Hill   $ 1,114,300
Jessica M. Hoover   $ 501,213
Meghan B. Leader   $ 513,218
Howard H. Pien   $ 5,121,543
Rino Rappuoli   $ 548,193
David V. Smith   $ 593,278
Daniel B. Soland   $ 1,389,000
Bryan L. Walser   $ 522,875
Gene W. Walther   $ 1,077,169
Craig A. Wheeler   $ 1,449,970

        Outstanding restricted stock units and restricted share rights will become fully vested and entitle the holder to receive an amount in cash, without interest, equal to $45.00 multiplied by each share of common stock subject to the restricted stock unit or restricted share right, subject to any deferral election under Chiron's deferred compensation plans, less applicable taxes. Chiron's directors do not own any unvested restricted stock units or unvested restricted share rights. The aggregate amount payable to each executive officer, less applicable tax withholdings, would be:

Director/
Executive Officer

  Restricted Stock Units/
Share Rights

Ursula B. Bartels   $ 877,500
Jack Goldstein   $ 2,790,000
Anne Hill   $ 405,000
Jessica M. Hoover   $ 491,400
Meghan B. Leader   $ 524,250
Howard H. Pien   $ 4,725,000
Rino Rappuoli   $ 855,000
David V. Smith   $ 1,030,500
Daniel B. Soland   $ 630,000
Bryan L. Walser   $ 888,750
Gene W. Walther   $ 716,400
Craig A. Wheeler   $ 1,170,000

        Pursuant to the merger agreement, Chiron's tax qualified Stock Purchase Program will be terminated and in connection with such termination, to the extent consistent with the terms of such program, each participant shall receive an incremental amount in cash equal to 10% of such participant's accumulated cash account under the program for the calendar year quarter during which the merger occurs representing the discount under the program for stock purchases. The aggregate of such payments to all participants, including executive officers, will not exceed $500,000.

34


        Chiron adopted a change in control severance plan for its executive officers in 2001. (Chiron's directors are not covered by the change in control severance plan.) The plan provides that a participant may receive specified severance benefits if there is a qualifying termination within 24 months following a change in control of Chiron (as defined in the plan). Under the plan, the merger would constitute a change in control. A qualifying termination is defined in the plan to include an involuntary termination of employment for reasons other than for cause, death or disability and a voluntary termination for good reason. Cause is defined in the plan to include, among other things, a participant's willful and continued failure to perform his or her duties after a written warning, a participant's material act of dishonesty, fraud or embezzlement or the participant's having been convicted of a felony. Good reason is defined to include in the plan, among other things, assignment of the participant to duties inconsistent with the participant's position or a material reduction in the participant's responsibilities, relocation of the participant to a location that is at least 50 miles further from participant's current primary residence than is such residence from the Company's current headquarters or a material reduction in the participant's salary, bonus opportunity or ability to participate in various benefit plans.

        The plan provides for three levels of coverage based on the executive officer's position with Chiron. Tier I applies to Chiron's Chief Executive Officer, tier II applies to Chiron's executive committee members and tier III applies to Chiron's vice presidents and divisional vice presidents.

        Under the plan, in the event of a qualifying termination within 24 months following the merger, the participant will receive:

35


        Given a hypothetical closing date for the merger on March 1, 2006 and an immediate qualifying termination of each executive officer and based on their current base salary and bonus, the aggregate amount payable to each executive officer following the merger (including an estimated cash value for continuation of insurance and health care benefits), less applicable tax withholdings, would be:

Director/
Executive Officer

  Change in
Control Plan

Ursula B. Bartels   $ 2,474,233
Jack Goldstein   $ 5,165,941
Anne Hill   $ 1,881,339
Jessica M. Hoover   $ 1,962,244
Meghan B. Leader   $ 1,598,530
Howard H. Pien   $ 11,861,444
Rino Rappuoli   $ 839,887
David V. Smith   $ 2,336,331
Daniel B. Soland   $ 2,757,659
Bryan L. Walser   $ 1,870,006
Gene W. Walther   $ 2,684,493
Craig A. Wheeler   $ 4,077,296

        The foregoing amounts are based on compensation as of December 31, 2005 and will change if such executive officers receive a change in compensation in 2006. The Compensation Committee typically evaluates and makes changes in executive officer compensation at its meeting in February of each year.

        Pursuant to an agreement with Craig Wheeler dated August 12, 2003, Chiron agreed to make a payment, among others, of $200,000 on September 1, 2006 in lieu of a loan that was originally promised in the agreement dated August 2, 2001. In the event of a qualifying termination (as defined in the 1991 Stock Option Plan) following the merger, the $200,000 payment will be accelerated and paid at the time of termination of employment. Pursuant to an agreement with Howard Pien dated March 19, 2003, Chiron agreed to credit to Mr. Pien's account under Chiron's supplemental executive retirement plan $50,000 per calendar quarter up to a maximum of $1,000,000 to replace certain pension benefits that would have been provided by his prior employer. At the closing of the merger, Chiron will credit any remaining portion of the $1,000,000 to Mr. Pien's account ($450,000 as of December 31, 2005).

        Under the merger agreement, from the closing until December 31, 2006, Novartis Corporation agreed to provide Chiron employees (other than employees subject to collective bargaining agreements) with compensation and benefits that are no less favorable in the aggregate than those provided to the Chiron's employees immediately before the closing. Novartis Corporation agreed to honor Chiron's employee benefit plans in accordance with the terms and conditions of such plans as in effect immediately before the closing. Novartis Corporation specifically agreed to honor for a period of one year after the closing the severance plans and agreements currently in effect.

        Novartis Corporation will also honor the determination made by Chiron with respect to 2005 bonus payments (subject to a cap of $60 million) and equity grants for 2006, as well as salary increases based on merit reviews made in the ordinary course of business.

        Employees will receive credit for their service with Chiron before the closing, and all pre-existing conditions will be waived.

36



        Certain provisions are applicable to US and UK employees only, due to statutory protection provided to employees in certain other countries.

        See "The Merger Agreement—Employee Benefits" for additional information.

        Certain members of Chiron management may remain with Chiron following the completion of the transaction; however, to date, there are no specific agreements or commitments with respect to future service and it is not currently expected that any such persons will receive a material increase in compensation following the completion of the transaction. Further, it is not currently expected that any members of the Chiron board will remain on the Chiron board following the completion of the transaction.

        The merger agreement provides that Novartis Corporation and the surviving corporation in the merger will indemnify our officers and directors for costs, expenses, judgments and other liabilities arising out of, relating to or in connection with acts and omissions occurring before completion of the merger and the adoption of the merger agreement, the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, will not for a period of six years from the closing date amend existing indemnification arrangements with officers or directors or charter provisions relating to indemnification or exculpation of officer or directors, as the case may be, in a manner that would adversely affect their rights thereunder and, subject to certain conditions, will maintain Chiron's current directors' and officers' liability insurance. See "The Merger Agreement—Indemnification of Officers and Directors."

        As of the record date, the directors and executive officers of Chiron owned               shares of common stock, which is equal to        % of the outstanding common stock and    % of the outstanding common stock, excluding those shares owned by Novartis AG and its subsidiaries. Chiron believes that its directors and executive officers intend to vote for the adoption of the merger agreement.

Transactions and Relationships Between Novartis and Chiron

        The following is a summary of certain portions of the existing contractual arrangement among Chiron, Novartis AG and Novartis Corporation. This summary is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the agreements, which have been filed as exhibits to the Schedule 13e-3 filed by Chiron, Novartis AG and certain Novartis AG affiliates with the SEC in connection with the merger.

        Through a series of transactions that became effective in January 1995, Novartis acquired shares of Chiron's common stock, which, when combined with shares already held by Novartis, represented 49.9% of the then-outstanding common stock of Chiron. Chiron, in turn, acquired from Novartis all of the capital stock of Chiron Diagnostics Corporation (formerly Ciba Corning Diagnostics Corp.) and Chiron Vaccines Company and Chiron S.p.A. (formerly The Biocine Company and Biocine S.p.A.). As a result of dilution stemming primarily from the issuance of common stock under Chiron's employee stock option and stock purchase plans, and in connection with certain acquisitions, as of December 31, 2005, Novartis held approximately 43.9% of Chiron's outstanding common stock.

        Chiron's relationship with Novartis includes a series of arrangements which affect Chiron's corporate governance, investment policies, research, development, manufacturing and marketing,

37



although Chiron and Novartis continue to work together on an arm's-length basis while remaining independent to pursue their respective corporate strategies. In connection with those transactions, Chiron and Novartis entered into certain agreements which are described below.

        Standstill.    Under the governance agreement, Novartis has agreed not to increase its ownership interest in Chiron above 55% unless:

        Pursuant to the governance agreement, Novartis has the right, but not the obligation, to propose a buy-out transaction. Except as provided below, neither Novartis nor Chiron has any "put" or "call" options that would obligate either party to enter into a buy-out transaction. If Novartis proposes a buy-out transaction, it must offer to buy all of Chiron's outstanding equity securities at a price based upon a "third party sale value" (i.e., the value that an unaffiliated third party would be expected to pay to purchase all of Chiron's equity securities in an arm's-length transaction negotiated by a willing seller and a willing buyer).

        If Novartis proposes a buy-out transaction, the independent directors (as defined in the governance agreement), acting solely on behalf of Chiron's stockholders other than Novartis, would consider the proposal, and with approval of a majority of independent directors, may accept it subject to stockholder approval. If the independent directors do not accept the proposal, Novartis may request binding arbitration to determine the third party sale value. The independent directors may delay the arbitration for a period of up to one year under certain circumstances. Upon determination of the third party sale value by arbitration, Novartis may either proceed with the proposed buy-out transaction at the third party sale value determined by arbitration or withdraw its proposed buy-out transaction in accordance with terms set forth in the governance agreement. If Novartis withdraws its proposed buy-out transaction following the determination of third party sale value by arbitration, Novartis cannot withdraw any subsequent proposal that results in a second arbitration to determine the third party sale value of Chiron. In connection with the signing of the merger agreement, the Chiron board of directors (with the Novartis' directors having recused themselves), including all of the independent directors as defined in the governance agreement, unanimously approved the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and recommended that Chiron's stockholders adopt the merger agreement. As part of the negotiation of the merger agreement, Novartis also agreed to condition the closing of the merger on the adoption of the merger agreement by a majority of our outstanding shares not held by Novartis AG and its subsidiaries.

        Proxy Solicitations and Voting Trusts.    The governance agreement further provides that unless and until Novartis AG and its subsidiaries own all of Chiron's capital stock, they will not solicit proxies or initiate or encourage stockholders to initiate proposals, nor will they encourage any persons with respect to the voting of equity securities of Chiron or enter into any voting trust or similar arrangement to vote any of Chiron's equity securities.

38



        Anti-dilution Provisions.    Under the governance agreement, if Chiron's board of directors authorizes the issuance of any equity securities or convertible debt, Novartis, with certain exceptions, has the right to purchase a portion of the securities sufficient to preserve its ownership interest in Chiron. If Novartis elects to do so, Novartis must purchase the securities at the same time and on the same terms and conditions as the new securities are issued and sold to third parties. If the securities are issued for consideration other than cash, Novartis is required to pay the fair market value of the securities (as determined in accordance with the governance agreement).

        Certain Corporate Transactions.    The governance agreement provides that as long as Novartis owns at least 40% of Chiron's outstanding voting stock, Chiron may not engage in certain corporate transactions without Novartis' approval. These transactions generally include:

        In addition, a majority of the directors of Chiron's board who have been designated by Novartis must approve certain other corporate transactions as described in the governance agreement. These transactions generally include:

        Transactions Between Chiron and Novartis.    In addition, under the governance agreement, a majority of the independent directors or holders of a majority of Chiron's voting stock which is held by unaffiliated stockholders, must approve any contract, agreement or transaction with Novartis or any of its affiliates that is described in Item 404 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC.

        Nomination of Directors and Voting of Shares.    Under the governance agreement, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Chiron's board is responsible, among other things, for recommending the nomination of directors, subject to Novartis' right to designate three directors. The number of directors whom Novartis may designate declines if Novartis' ownership interest in Chiron declines to less than 30%. Our bylaws currently fix the number of directors at ten.

        The governance agreement further provides that as long as Novartis continues to own at least 40% of Chiron's outstanding capital stock, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will be comprised of three independent directors and two Novartis directors (also referred to as investor directors); and if Novartis' percentage interest of Chiron's outstanding capital stock is less than 40%, the committee will be comprised of three independent directors and one investor director. A majority

39



of the independent directors designate the independent directors who serve on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and a majority of the investor directors designate the investor directors who serve on the committee. A quorum of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee required for any action requires the attendance of at least two independent directors and both investor director members. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee acts by majority vote of the entire committee; provided, however, that as long as Novartis' percentage interest is at least 40%, no action to nominate a director may be taken by the committee that is opposed by both of the investor directors. Beginning in the year 2006, as long as Novartis owns at least 49% of Chiron's outstanding capital stock, the investor directors of the committee will have the deciding vote with respect to nomination of any directors, meaning the vote of the two investor directors will control over the vote of the independent directors.

        Measurement Standards.    The governance agreement further provides that the board will set and approve measurement standards to evaluate Chiron's performance for each fiscal year. The measurement standards are derived from Chiron's annual financial and operating performance goals, and include quantitative items such as revenue, earnings per share and stock price appreciation targets, as well as qualitative items such as research and development, commercial and corporate milestones. If the applicable measurement standards are not met for any fiscal year, the governance agreement provides that a committee comprised of the three investor directors, three independent directors and one management director, called the Strategic Planning Committee, will be created. The purpose of the committee will be to prepare and recommend to the board a remedial plan intended to restore Chiron to compliance with the measurement standards. In addition, until the measurement standards are met for a subsequent full fiscal year, a majority of the board, which majority must include a majority of all the investor directors and a majority of all the independent directors, is required to approve any such remedial plan and the Chiron operating plan and budget, and to set executive officer compensation. If Chiron does not meet the measurement standards for two consecutive fiscal years, (1) the Strategic Planning Committee is empowered by the board (until the applicable measurement standards are met for a full fiscal year) to set the compensation and terminate the employment of Chiron's executive officers and (2) a majority of the board, which majority must include a majority of all the investor directors and a majority of all the independent directors, is required to approve certain additional matters, including the hiring of new executive officers, the issuance of new equity securities, the incurrence of indebtedness other than in the ordinary course and the initiation of material acquisitions. Until 2004, Chiron had met the applicable measurement standards each year since 1995. Chiron did not meet the 2004 measurement standards as a result of the suspension in 2004 of Chiron's license to manufacture FLUVIRIN vaccine and Chiron's failure to release any FLUVIRIN vaccine for the 2004-2005 influenza season. While the board has taken steps consistent with the role of the Strategic Planning Committee, directing the preparation of and approving a remedial plan to bring Chiron back to compliance with applicable measurement standards, the board has not established a Strategic Planning Committee at this time. Chiron management believes that Chiron has met the measurement standards for 2005, but this has not yet been finally determined.

        Bank Debt Guarantee.    Under the terms of the investment agreement, Novartis agreed to guarantee certain Chiron obligations under revolving credit facilities through January 1, 2008, the date on which the guarantee will expire. The principal amount of indebtedness under the guaranteed credit facilities outstanding at any one time may not exceed a specified cap. That cap is $402.5 million. The cap may be increased or decreased in certain circumstances that are described in the investment agreement, as amended. In November 1996, Chiron and Novartis agreed that Chiron could increase the maximum borrowing amount under the guaranteed credit facilities by up to $300.0 million, for a maximum borrowing amount under the cap of $702.5 million. In exchange for this increase, the amount of Chiron's common stock required to be purchased by a Novartis affiliate, at Chiron's request, as

40


described below under "Subscription Agreement," would be reduced by an equal amount. As a result of the exercise of our subscription right as described under "—Conduct of Business of Chiron if the Merger is not Completed," the maximum amount Novartis is required to guarantee pursuant to the terms of the investment agreement has been reduced by $300.0 million, the amount of our common stock acquired by Novartis Biotech pursuant to the exercise of our subscription rights, to approximately $402.5 million. In December 2005, Chiron elected to increase the amount that Novartis may be required to guarantee up to the maximum borrowing amount. Chiron also agreed to enter into a separate agreement with Novartis for each obligation guaranteed by Novartis under which Chiron agrees to reimburse Novartis for any payments made or out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Novartis in connection with the guarantee (each, a reimbursement agreement). Chiron's obligations under the reimbursement agreements are, at the request of Novartis, to be fully secured by collateral (which means guaranteed by assets pledged by Chiron) acceptable to Novartis. In 2004, Novartis guaranteed $100.0 million under a U.S. credit facility for Chiron's benefit for which there were no borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2005 and $173.3 million of Chiron's lease commitments. As a result of these guarantees and the conversion of $9.8 million of bonds in 2000 into shares of Chiron common stock, there remains approximately $307.7 million of the guarantee available following the exercise of our subscription right and our subsequent election to increase the amount Novartis may be required to guarantee to the maximum borrowing amount.

        Also under the terms of the investment agreement, Chiron granted to individuals who on November 20, 1994 held options under Chiron's stock option plan the right to receive cash payments from Novartis upon surrender for cancellation of such options. The right to receive the payment vests as the underlying options vest. Once vested, the right is exercisable at any time the option is outstanding. For options that vested after 1995, the optionee must surrender the underlying options to receive the payment. In 2005, 2004 and 2003, Novartis made no payments to eligible option holders in connection with the surrender for cancellation of such options.

        The investment agreement also provided that Novartis would make certain research funding available to Chiron. Novartis' commitment was memorialized in the limited liability company agreement entered into between Chiron and Novartis Corporation, in December 1995, or the R&D funding agreement. The R&D funding agreement provided that Novartis would purchase interests in a limited liability company as a means of providing this funding. In December 2000, this agreement was amended to provide that, through December 31, 2001, at Chiron's request, Novartis would fund up to 100% of the development costs incurred between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2000 on these projects. The amount of funding that Novartis was obligated to provide was subject to an aggregate limit of $265.0 million. Novartis funded $265.0 million over the term of this agreement. Although Novartis' agreement to purchase interests expired on December 31, 2001, there are certain royalty and co-promotion rights that remain.

        Under the R&D funding agreement, Novartis funded certain research and development projects (known as the "Funded Projects"). The Funded Projects included certain adult and pediatric vaccines, Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1, Factor VIII gene therapy ("Factor VIII") and Herpes Simplex Virus-thymidine kinase ("HSV-tk"). In exchange for providing the funding, Novartis has certain rights, as described below, in certain adult and pediatric vaccines, Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1, Factor VIII and HSV-tk known as the "Products."

        In consideration of the funding provided by Novartis under the R&D funding agreement, Novartis Corporation receives royalties on worldwide sales from the Products, if any, which Chiron successfully develops. Novartis also has co-promotional rights, in countries other than in North America and Europe, for certain adult vaccines. Under the R&D funding agreement, Chiron is obligated to pay

41



royalties on the designated Products for a minimum of ten years from the later of October 1, 2001 or the date of the first commercial sale of individual Products covered by the amended R&D funding agreement. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, Chiron recorded royalties to Novartis of $0.9 million, $0.6 million and $2.4 million, respectively, which we recorded in "Cost of sales" in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

        Chiron also agreed to work with Novartis to collaborate in research and development, marketing and manufacturing, and to give each party access to the other party's technology and reciprocal "most-favored nation" rights for certain licenses. The agreement provides a means by which Chiron or Novartis may specifically propose to collaborate with the other party in an area of research and development, yet retain a 90-day right of first negotiation with respect to that area. Neither Chiron nor Novartis has the right to enter into any material research and development collaboration related to Chiron's strategic mission with any third party if it is anticipated that the third party's only contribution to the collaboration will be funding, unless Chiron or Novartis has first offered to the other party an opportunity to collaborate on the same terms as offered by that third party. The restrictions do not apply to collaborations that are not funded commercially, such as grants, or financing arrangements with third parties where the third party receives a return on the financed amount. Also, under the cooperation and collaboration agreement, Novartis and Chiron have: (1) a reciprocal right of first refusal to market certain products developed by the other party or which the other party has the right to market, and (2) a reciprocal right of first negotiation to manufacture certain products developed by the other party or which the other party has the right to manufacture.

        Under this agreement, Chiron granted to an affiliate of Novartis an option to purchase newly issued shares of equity securities directly from Chiron at fair market value. Under the terms of this agreement, known as the market price option agreement, Novartis has the right to purchase from Chiron shares of newly issued common stock in an amount which, when added to other shares held directly or indirectly by Novartis, would increase Novartis' aggregate ownership up to 55% of Chiron's then outstanding common stock. Novartis may exercise this option at any time. Novartis also may exercise the option repeatedly, with a minimum purchase equal to $1.0 million each time. Novartis may not exercise the option if it owns shares representing less than 30% of the aggregate number of votes entitled to be voted at an election of directors of Chiron. In addition, one of the following "exercise conditions" must be satisfied: (i) Novartis is restricted by law from purchasing equity securities from any person other than Chiron (including any restriction resulting from Novartis' possession of non-public material information concerning Chiron); (ii) there is insufficient liquidity in the open market to permit Novartis to purchase the number of shares it desires, either within the time period it desires or without unduly affecting the price of the shares; or (iii) Novartis' ownership interest in Chiron at that time is below 50% and it wishes (and is permitted under then applicable standstill provisions of the governance agreement) to increase its ownership interest to above 50% (although if this is the only exercise condition that is satisfied, Novartis is not permitted to purchase shares that would increase its ownership interest above 51%).

        Under a subscription agreement with Novartis, Chiron has the right to require Novartis to purchase common stock directly from Chiron at fair market value, up to a maximum initial subscription amount of $500 million. The subscription amount will be reduced in certain circumstances, as described in the subscription agreement, and is also subject to reduction by the amount of any increase if the amount Novartis is required to guarantee under the investment agreement is increased above

42


$402.5 million. In November 1996, Chiron and Novartis agreed that Chiron could increase the maximum borrowing amount under the guaranteed credit facilities by up to $300.0 million, as discussed under "—Bank Debt Guarantee" above. As a result, if the bank debt guarantee is increased by $300.0 million, the maximum subscription amount would be decreased to $200.0 million. However, as described below, Chiron exercised its right to require Novartis to purchase shares of Chiron common stock valued at $300 million and the sale of those shares was completed on December 8, 2005. The subscription agreement expires in January 2006. Other than the 6,896,552 shares purchased on December 8, 2005 pursuant to Chiron's exercise of its subscription right and shares acquired upon conversion of $9.8 million of bonds in 2000, Novartis has not purchased any securities from Chiron (including the 2.75% Convertible Debentures issued in June 2004, the 1.625% Convertible Debentures issued in July 2003 and the Liquid Yield Option Notes issued in June 2001) pursuant to the market price option agreement or the subscription agreement.

        On October 30, 2005, Chiron gave notice to Novartis that it was exercising its right under the subscription agreement to require Novartis (or an affiliate) to purchase shares of Chiron common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $300 million at $43.50 per share (equivalent to 6,896,552 shares). Chiron and Novartis Biotech consummated the acquisition of these shares on December 8, 2005 as a result of which, Novartis AG and its subsidiaries collectively own approximately 43.9% of Chiron's outstanding common stock.

        Except as set forth herein, none of Novartis AG, Novartis Corporation, or Novartis Biotech nor, to the knowledge of Novartis AG, Novartis Corporation, or Novartis Biotech, any of the directors or executive officers of such entities has any contract, arrangement, understanding or relationship with any other person with respect to the shares of Chiron common stock (including, but not limited to, any contract, arrangement, understanding or relationship concerning the transfer or the voting of any shares of Chiron common stock, joint ventures, loan or option arrangements, puts or calls, guaranties of loans, guaranties against loss or the giving or withholding of proxies, consents or authorizations). Except as set forth herein, during the past two years, none of Novartis AG, Novartis Corporation, or Novartis Biotech, their subsidiaries, or their controlling persons, nor, to the knowledge of each of Novartis AG, Novartis Corporation, and Novartis Biotech, any of the directors or executive officers of such entities, has had any business relationship or entered into any transaction with Chiron or any of its executive officers, directors or affiliates that is required to be reported under the rules and regulations of the SEC applicable to the merger. Except as described in this section "—Transactions and Relationships Between Novartis and Chiron" or in "Stock Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Owners," none of Novartis AG, Novartis Corporation, or Novartis Biotech, to the knowledge of Novartis AG, Novartis Corporation or Novartis Biotech, the directors or executive officers of such entities, nor any of their respective associates or majority-owned subsidiaries, beneficially owns or has a right to acquire any securities of the Chiron.

        In April 2003, Chiron acquired exclusive worldwide development and commercial rights from Novartis for PULMINQ ™ inhalation solution, a therapy under evaluation for treatment of rejection and reduction of mortality in lung transplant recipients for $0.5 million, which was expensed as research and development costs in 2003.

Contract Manufacturing Agreement with Novartis Pharma AG for Diamorphine

        As of March 1, 2005, Chiron entered into a contract manufacturing and supply agreement with Novartis Pharma AG for the production and manufacture of Diamorphine by Novartis for sale by Chiron in the United Kingdom. Under the terms of the agreement, Chiron agrees to order, and Novartis Pharma agrees to process and supply, a minimum quantity of Diamorphine. Novartis Pharma will purchase all components at its own cost and may, at Chiron's request, use reasonable efforts to

43



increase capacity. For the year-ended December 31, 2005, Chiron paid Novartis Pharma 515,000 Swiss Francs under the agreement. The agreement will remain in effect until June 30, 2006, unless it is earlier terminated.

Distribution Agreement with Novartis Pharma GmbH for Vaccines

        Chiron is party to a Distribution Agreement with Novartis Pharma GmbH, dated as of July 1, 2005, as amended, pursuant to which Novartis Pharma GmbH serves as the exclusive distributor for certain Chiron vaccines in Austria. Under the terms of the agreement, Novartis agrees to purchase on an annual basis a minimum quantity of each vaccine distributed under the agreement. For the year-ended December 31, 2005, Novartis Pharma GmbH paid Chiron 829,000 Euros under the agreement. The agreement will remain in effect until July 1, 2008, and thereafter will renew automatically for an additional period of one year, unless it is earlier terminated.

Transactions in Chiron Stock

        Except as disclosed in this proxy statement, none of Novartis AG, Novartis Corporation, Novartis Biotech have purchased any shares of Chiron common stock in the last two years. Except as disclosed in this proxy statement, none of Novartis, Novartis Corporation, Novartis Biotech or their respective executive officers and directors or the executive officers and directors of Chiron have engaged in any transactions in Chiron common stock within 60 days of the date of this proxy statement. The following sets forth certain information concerning purchases by Chiron common stock by Chiron during the second and third quarters of 2004 (Chiron had no stock repurchases in the first or fourth quarters of 2004 or in 2005):

Period

  Number
of Shares

  Average Price
Per Share

  Range of Prices
Paid Per Share

 
  (in millions)

   
   
Third Quarter 2004   1.4   $ 44.56   $ 42.60 - 46.63
Second Quarter 2004   1.5     43.95     42.33 - 45.43

Material Federal Income Tax Considerations

        The exchange of Chiron common stock for cash pursuant to the merger will be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes and may also be taxable under applicable state, local, foreign and other tax laws. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a stockholder who receives cash as a result of the merger will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the adjusted basis of the shares exchanged and the amount of cash received therefor. Any such recognized gain or loss will be capital gain or loss if the shares are held as capital assets by the stockholder, and will be long term capital gain or loss if the stockholder has held the shares for more than one year. Long-term capital gain of a non-corporate stockholder is subject to a maximum U.S. federal income tax rate of 15%. The merger will not be a taxable transaction to Chiron or Novartis.

        The income tax discussion set forth above may not be applicable to stockholders in special situations such as stockholders who received their shares upon the exercise of stock options or otherwise as compensation, stockholders who are traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings and stockholders who are not United States persons. We recommend that stockholders consult their own tax advisors with respect to the specific tax consequences to them of the merger, including the application and effect of federal, state, local, foreign or other tax laws.

44


Litigation

        Between September 1 and September 13, 2005, twelve class action lawsuits were filed by Chiron stockholders against Chiron and members of Chiron's board of directors (together, the "Chiron Defendants"), Novartis and Novartis Corporation (in two of the actions) regarding Novartis' September 1, 2005 offer to acquire the approximately 58% of Chiron shares that Novartis does not already own for $40.00 per share ("Proposal"). Eight of the suits were filed in the Superior Court of the State of California in Alameda County (the "California Actions") by (i) Ronald Abramoff, Harold Adelson, Beverly McCalla, Joan Weisberg and Davis Jaroslowicz; (ii) Edith Auman; (iii) Joseph Fisher, MD, P.C. New Profit Sharing Trust, Trustee Joseph Fisher MD; (iv) William Lattarulo; (v) Steven Rosenberg and The Harold Grill IRA; (vi) Tracie Scotto; (vii) Albert Stein; and (viii) William Steiner (the "California Plaintiffs"). The remaining four suits were filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County (the "Delaware Actions") by (ix) Judy Longcore; (x) Paulena Partners L.L.C.; (xi) Sylvia Piven; and (xii) the Thomas Stone Irrevocable Trust (the "Delaware Plaintiffs"). The eight California Actions have been consolidated, as have the four Delaware Actions. The California Actions together with the Delaware Actions are collectively referred to below as the "Actions" or the "Litigation."

        On January 24, 2006, the California Plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint. The California Plaintiffs allege that the Chiron Defendants and Novartis breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the merger because the merger price is inadequate and unfair. The California Plaintiffs allege that the merger is the product of a "flawed process" that was designed to ensure the sale of Chiron to Novartis on terms that are unfairly preferential to Novartis and prejudicial to the interests of the remaining Chiron shareholders. Among other things, the California Plaintiffs allege that Chiron's financial advisors were not independent because they had long-standing relationships with Novartis and that Chiron's board of directors is not independent from Novartis. The California Plaintiffs also allege that Novartis used its position and access to material, non-public information about Chiron to time the merger to their unfair advantage. The California Plaintiffs allege that the Chiron Defendants and Novartis sought to exploit events that had temporarily weakened Chiron in order to acquire Chiron at a significant discount from its true value. The California Plaintiffs also allege that Chiron's proxy materials omit material information, include materially misleading statements and are unfairly coercive. In their prayer for relief, the California Plaintiffs seek: (i) to enjoin the merger under the terms presently proposed; (ii) to rescind any transaction or be granted rescissory damages if a transaction is consummated prior to entry of final judgment; and (iii) an award of damages, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. Each of the original complaints and the consolidated complaint have been filed as an exhibit to the Schedule 13E-3 filed by Chiron and the Novartis entities in connection with this transaction.

        The California Plaintiffs have filed a motion for, among other things, expedited proceedings, and Chiron has filed a motion to stay the California Actions in favor of the Delaware Actions. A hearing on those motions is scheduled for February 7, 2006.

        The Delaware Actions also challenge the consideration offered Chiron's stockholders by the Novartis Proposal as "unfair and inadequate" because the price does not reflect "the intrinsic value of Chiron's common stock…and the Company's prospects for future growth and earnings." The Delaware Plaintiffs also allege that Novartis "timed its offer to take advantage of the decline in market price of Chiron's stock" and that Novartis has superior access to information about Chiron's future prospects as compared to Chiron's other stockholders. The Delaware Plaintiffs further allege that Novartis "dominates and controls" Chiron's board and that the Chiron Defendants and Novartis have breached their fiduciary duties of care and loyalty. Two of the complaints filed by the Delaware Plaintiffs challenge the governance agreement. In particular, these Delaware Plaintiffs challenge the Arbitration Provision and the Veto Provision as illegally supplanting "the Board's exclusive authority to govern the business and affairs" of Chiron under the Delaware General Corporate Law (the "DGCL"), including

45



Sections 141 and 251 of the DGCL. In their prayers for relief, the Delaware Plaintiffs seek to (i) preliminarily and permanently enjoin the proposed transaction; (ii) rescind any transaction or be granted rescissory damages if a transaction is consummated prior to the Court's entry of a final judgment; and (iii) invalidate certain provision of the governance agreement, including the Arbitration and Veto Provisions. The Delaware Plaintiffs also seek an award of reasonable costs and attorneys' fees. Each of the complaints with respect to the Delaware Actions has been filed as an exhibit to the Schedule 13E-3 filed by Chiron and the Novartis entities in connection with this transaction.

        Chiron has filed an answer to the complaints in the four Delaware Actions and denied the material allegations therein. The Chiron Defendants have moved to dismiss two of the Delaware Actions and the plaintiffs in those actions have moved for a declaratory judgment. Mr. Pien has filed an answer to the complaints in those actions and denied the material allegations therein.

        In the event a majority of the Chiron shares not owned by Novartis and its subsidiaries are voted in favor of the merger proposal, the Chiron Defendants intend to rely upon that vote in defense of the claims asserted against the Chiron Defendants in the Litigation. Specifically, the Chiron Defendants intend to argue, among other things, that a vote in favor of the merger proposal by a majority of Chiron's stockholders (excluding the shares owned by Novartis and its subsidiaries) constitutes a ratification and/or acceptance of the conduct and actions challenged in the Litigation and that any stockholder who chooses to accept the offer has thereby waived and relinquished the right to pursue any of the claims that have been or could have been asserted against the Chiron Defendants in the Litigation. The Chiron Defendants further intend to argue that such ratification, acceptance and waiver constitutes a complete defense to the claims asserted against the Chiron Defendants in the Litigation or otherwise operates to protect the Chiron Defendants from liability or increase the plaintiffs' burdens of proof. The Chiron Defendants will also argue that, as to them, any holder of Chiron shares who voted in favor of the merger proposal has consented or acquiesced in the transaction and cannot attack it or participate as a class member in any of the Actions or any inter-filed lawsuit seeking damages relating to or arising out of the transaction.

Regulatory Approvals

        As a condition to the merger, the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, or the HSR Act, requires us and Novartis to observe the HSR's notification and waiting period. The HSR Act provides for an initial 30-calendar-day waiting period following the necessary filings by the parties to the merger. On November 14, 2005, we and Novartis filed the Notification and Report Forms with the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, or Antitrust Division, for review in connection with the merger. Early termination of the 30-day waiting period was granted effective December 5, 2005. The HSR Act also requires that the acquirer pay a filing fee in connection with its request for antitrust approval under the HSR Act. Novartis paid a fee of $280,000 in connection with the filing for this transaction.

        In addition, closing requires antitrust approval from foreign antitrust governmental and regulatory agencies, including from the European Commission pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) NO. 139/2004 (the "Regulation"). The European Commission must review the combination to determine whether or not it is compatible with the common market and, accordingly, decide whether or not to permit it to proceed. A merger or acquisition which does not significantly impede effective competition in all or a substantial part of the European Union, in particular, by creating or strengthening a dominant position, shall be declared compatible with the common market, and must be allowed to proceed. If, following a preliminary Phase I investigation, which can last up to thirty-five working days from formal filing of the notification of the combination, the European Commission considers that it needs to examine the combination more closely because it raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market, it must initiate further Phase II investigation procedures. Novartis formally requested antitrust approval from the European Commission on December 23, 2005. On February 6, 2006, the European

46



Commission adopted a decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of the Regulation declaring the combination compatible with the common market.

        On November 23, 2005, Novartis filed a notification of the combination with the antitrust authorities in Brazil. Novartis and Chiron have reviewed whether other filings or approvals may be required or desirable in other jurisdictions and have applied for all antitrust approvals that were deemed necessary or desirable, including Albania, Bulgaria, China, South Korea (approval obtained) and Turkey.

        In addition, the provisions of Exon-Florio under the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 empower the President of the United States to prohibit or suspend an acquisition of, or investment in, a U.S. person by a non-U.S. person if the President finds, after investigation, credible evidence that the non-U.S. person might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the U.S. and that other provisions of existing law do not provide adequate and appropriate authority to protect the national security of the U.S. Any determination that an investigation is called for must be made within 30 days of notice of the proposed transaction. If such a determination is made, any investigation must be completed within 45 days of the determination and any decision to take action must be announced within 15 days of completion of the investigation. While there is no requirement under Exon-Florio that any "waiting period" expire before the merger can close, the merger agreement does require, as a condition to Novartis' obligation to close, that the U.S. government have completed its national security review and, if necessary, investigation under Exon-Florio and concluded that no adverse action with respect to the merger is warranted. On December 22, 2005, the parties sent a letter to the Committee on Foreign investment in the United States, or CFIUS, requesting review under Exon-Florio. On January 23, 2006 the CFIUS advised Chiron that it had concluded its review of the proposed acquisition of Chiron by Novartis and determined that there are no issues of national security sufficient to warrant an investigation under Exon-Florio. All U.S. and European Union regulatory reviews for the proposed merger have now been completed.

        With the exception of possible additional approvals or clearances from foreign competition authorities, Chiron does not believe that any other material regulatory approvals, filings or notices are required by Chiron in connection with the merger, other than filings or notices required under federal securities laws and the filing of a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. Chiron and Novartis believe that they will receive such clearances, but there can be no assurance as to what the outcome of any investigation will be or whether a challenge to the proposed combination will be made by any governmental authority or, if such a challenge is made, what the result will be.

Source and Amount of Funds; Financing for the Merger

        Consummation of the merger is not subject to any financing conditions. Novartis and its direct and indirect subsidiaries have and will have, as of the closing of the merger, available cash or other liquid assets to finance the purchase. Novartis and its direct and indirect subsidiaries will contribute or otherwise advance a sufficient amount of funds to Novartis Corporation and Novartis Biotech to consummate the merger. Novartis Corporation and Novartis Biotech will need approximately $5.1 billion to acquire all of Chiron's outstanding shares of Chiron common stock and to cash out outstanding stock options, restricted stock units and restricted share rights in the merger and to pay related fees and expenses.

Fees and Expenses

        All fees and expenses incurred in connection with the merger, the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement will be paid by the party incurring them, except that fees and expenses related to printing, filing and mailing this proxy statement and the

47



Schedule 13E-3 will be shared equally by Novartis and us. Estimated fees and expenses expected to be incurred by us in connection with the merger are as follows (dollars in thousands):

SEC filing fees   $ 603
Financial advisors' fees and expenses     20,650
Legal fees and expenses     9,800
Accounting fees     15
Printing, proxy solicitation and mailing costs     500
Payment agent fees     50
Miscellaneous     250
  Total   $ 31,868

48



APPRAISAL RIGHTS

        Under Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL, any holder of our common stock who does not wish to accept the $45.00 per share merger consideration may dissent from the merger and elect to exercise appraisal rights. Even if the merger is approved by the holders of the requisite number of shares of Chiron common stock, you are entitled to exercise appraisal rights and obtain payment of the "fair value" for your shares, exclusive of any element of value arising from the expectation or accomplishment of the merger.

        Under Section 262 of the DGCL, when a merger is submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, as in the case of the merger agreement, the corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting, must notify each of its stockholders entitled to appraisal rights that appraisal rights are available and include in the notice a copy of Section 262 of the DGCL. This proxy statement constitutes the notice, and we attach the applicable statutory provisions to this proxy statement as Annex D.

        In order to effectively exercise your appraisal rights, you must satisfy each of the following primary requirements:


        If you fail to comply with any of the above conditions or otherwise fail to comply with the requirements of Section 262 of the DGCL, you will have no appraisal rights with respect to your shares.

        Neither voting (in person or by proxy) against, abstaining from voting on or failing to vote on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement will constitute a written demand for appraisal within the meaning of Section 262 of the DGCL. The written demand for appraisal must be in addition to and separate from any proxy or vote.

        The address for purposes of making an appraisal demand is:

        Only a holder of record of shares of Chiron common stock, or a person duly authorized and explicitly purporting to act on his or her behalf, is entitled to assert an appraisal right for the shares of Chiron common stock registered in his or her name. Beneficial owners who are not record holders and who wish to exercise appraisal rights are advised to consult promptly with the appropriate record holders as to the timely exercise of appraisal rights. A record holder, such as a broker, who holds shares of Chiron common stock as a nominee for others, may exercise appraisal rights with respect to the shares of Chiron common stock held for one or more beneficial owners, while not exercising such rights for other beneficial owners. In such a case, the written demand should set forth the number of shares as to which the demand is made. Where no shares of Chiron common stock are expressly

49


mentioned, the demand will be presumed to cover all shares of Chiron common stock held in the name of such record holder.

        A demand for the appraisal of shares of Chiron common stock owned of record by two or more joint holders must identify and be signed by all of the holders. A demand for appraisal signed by trustees, executors, administrators, guardians, attorneys-in-fact, officers of corporations or others acting in a fiduciary or representative capacity must so identify the persons signing the demand.

        An appraisal demand may be withdrawn by a former stockholder within 60 days after the effective time of the merger, or thereafter only with the approval of Chiron. Upon withdrawal of an appraisal demand, the former stockholder will be entitled to receive the $45.00 cash payment per share referred to above, without interest.

        If we complete the merger, we will give written notice of the effective time of the merger within 10 days after the effective time of the merger to each of our former stockholders who did not vote in favor of the merger agreement and who made a written demand for appraisal in accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL. Within 120 days after the effective time of the merger, but not later, either the surviving corporation or any dissenting stockholder who has complied with the requirements of Section 262 of the DGCL may file a petition in the Delaware Court demanding a determination of the value of the shares of our common stock. Stockholders who desire to have their shares appraised should initiate any petitions necessary for the perfection of their appraisal rights within the time periods and in the manner prescribed in Section 262 of the DGCL.

        Under the merger agreement, we have agreed to give Novartis prompt notice of any demands for appraisal that we receive and any withdrawals of those demands. Novartis will have the opportunity to direct all negotiations and proceedings with respect to those demands. We will not, except with the prior written consent of Novartis, settle, offer to settle or make any payment with respect to any demands for appraisal.

        Within 120 days after the effective time of the merger, any stockholder who has complied with the provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL to that point in time, may receive from the surviving corporation, upon written request, a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the merger agreement and with respect to which we have received demands for appraisal, and the aggregate number of holders of those shares. The surviving corporation must mail this statement to the stockholder within 10 days of receipt of the request or within 10 days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisals under Section 262 of the DGCL, whichever is later.

        If a hearing on the petition is held, the Delaware Court is empowered to determine which dissenting stockholders are entitled to an appraisal of their shares. The Delaware Court may require dissenting stockholders to submit their certificates representing shares for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings, and the Delaware Court is empowered to dismiss the proceedings as to any dissenting stockholder who does not comply with this request. Accordingly, dissenting stockholders are cautioned to retain their share certificates pending resolution of the appraisal proceedings.

        After determination of the dissenting stockholders entitled to an appraisal, the Delaware Court will appraise the shares held by such dissenting stockholders at their fair value as of the effective time of the merger. When the value is so determined, the Delaware Court will direct the payment by the surviving corporation of such value, with interest thereon if the Delaware Court so determines, to the dissenting stockholders entitled to receive the same, upon surrender to the surviving corporation by such dissenting stockholders of the certificates representing such shares.

        In determining fair value, the Delaware Court will take into account all relevant factors. The Delaware Supreme Court has stated that "proof of value by any techniques or methods which are

50


generally considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise admissible in court" should be considered.

        Stockholders should be aware that the fair value of their shares as determined under Section 262 of the DGCL could be greater than, the same as, or less than the $45.00 merger consideration. In any appraisal proceeding, Novartis AG intends to take the position that the fair value of the shares of Chiron common stock is less than $45.00 per share.

        The Delaware courts may also, on application (1) assess costs among the parties as the Delaware courts deem equitable and (2) order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any dissenting stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees and fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all shares entitled to appraisal. Determinations by the Delaware courts are subject to appellate review by the Delaware Supreme Court.

        No appraisal proceedings in the Delaware courts shall be dismissed as to any dissenting stockholder without the approval of the Delaware court, and this approval may be conditioned upon terms which the Delaware court deems just.

        From and after the effective time of the merger, former holders of Chiron common stock are not entitled to vote their shares for any purpose and are not entitled to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on the shares.

        The foregoing description is not, and does not purport to be, a complete summary of the applicable provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of Section 262 of the DGCL which is set forth in its entirety in Annex D hereto. Any stockholder considering demanding an appraisal is advised to consult legal counsel.

51



THE MERGER AGREEMENT

        The following is a summary of certain provisions of the merger agreement, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement. This summary is not a complete description of the terms and conditions of the merger agreement and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the merger agreement which is included as Annex A to this proxy statement.

The Merger

        The merger agreement provides for the merger of Novartis Biotech Partnership, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Novartis AG and an indirect subsidiary of Novartis Corporation (which is referred to as "Novartis Biotech"), with and into Chiron, following which Chiron will become an indirect subsidiary of Novartis Corporation and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Novartis AG, and Novartis Biotech's separate corporate identity will end. After the merger, Chiron is sometimes referred to as the "surviving corporation."

        Unless otherwise agreed in writing between the parties, the closing of the merger will take place on the third business day following the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, other than those conditions that by their nature are to be satisfied at the closing, but subject to the satisfaction or waiver of those conditions.

        The effective time of the merger will occur when the certificate of merger is duly filed with the Delaware Secretary of State. Chiron anticipates that this filing will be made as soon as practicable following the approval by Chiron stockholders of the merger agreement and the satisfaction or waiver of the other conditions as set forth in the merger agreement and summarized below.

        Novartis AG has agreed to guarantee the obligations required to be performed by Novartis Corporation and Novartis Biotech under the merger agreement.

Effect of the Merger on Common Stock

        Upon completion of the merger, each share of Chiron common stock, other than "excluded shares" described below, will be converted into the right to receive $45.00 in cash, without interest, which represents the merger consideration. At the completion of the merger, all shares of Chiron common stock will no longer be outstanding and will be cancelled and retired and will cease to exist, and each certificate formerly representing the shares, other than those listed below, will thereafter represent only the right to receive the merger consideration.

        The shares of Chiron common stock that will not be converted into the merger consideration (which are referred to as "excluded shares") are:

        Each excluded share will by virtue of the merger cease to be outstanding, and will be cancelled and retired without payment of any consideration, and each dissenting share will only represent the right to receive the payment provided by Section 262 of the DGCL.

52



Treatment of Options and Share Rights

        Immediately before the effective time of the merger, each option to purchase shares of Chiron common stock shall become vested, if not already vested, and shall be converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to the merger consideration multiplied by the number of Chiron shares subject to such option. Immediately following such conversion, each option shall be cancelled and Novartis Corporation will pay or cause the surviving corporation to pay each holder of any such option a cash payment in an amount equal to the product of (A) the excess, if any, of the merger consideration over the exercise price per share of Chiron common stock subject to such option and (B) the number of shares of Chiron's common stock subject to such option, less any applicable withholding tax.

        Immediately before the effective time of the merger, each outstanding restricted stock unit or restricted share right shall become vested and shall be converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to the merger consideration multiplied by the number of Chiron shares subject to such restricted stock unit or restricted share right, subject to any deferral election in effect immediately prior to the effective time made by the holder under Chiron's deferred compensation plans, less applicable taxes, if any, required to be withheld with respect to such payment.

Directors and Officers

        From and after the effective time of the merger until successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified in accordance with applicable law, (1) the directors of Novartis Biotech at the effective time of the merger shall be the directors of the surviving corporation, and (2) the officers of Chiron at the effective time shall be the officers of the surviving corporation.

Representations and Warranties

        In the merger agreement, each party makes a number of customary representations and warranties as to, among other things, organization and good standing, corporate authority, and governmental approvals and third party consents.

        Chiron also makes additional customary representations and warranties to Novartis Corporation and Novartis Biotech, including with respect to capitalization; compliance with laws; no default; SEC reports and financial statements; no undisclosed material liabilities; litigation; material contracts; absence of material adverse effect since September 30, 2005; employee benefit plans; intellectual property; taxes; anti-takeover statutes and charter provisions; fairness opinions; and no brokers.

        Novartis Corporation and Novartis Biotech have also represented that they have funds available sufficient to pay the merger consideration.

        Many of Chiron's representations and warranties are qualified by the absence of a material adverse effect, which, for purposes of the merger agreement, means a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition or results of operations of Chiron and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, other than (1) any change, development, circumstance, event, or occurrence generally affecting the industries in which Chiron operates, except to the extent Chiron is affected in a disproportionate manner as compared to other similar companies in the industries in which it operates, (2) any change in general economic or political conditions, (3) any change in law or GAAP or interpretations thereof, (4) the direct impact of the announcement or performance of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement (including the direct impact of the merger agreement on relationships with employees, customers, suppliers and distributors), (5) any change, development, circumstance, event or occurrence relating to the revenues to be derived from sales of FLUVIRIN for the 2005-2006 influenza season, or (6) any change, development, circumstance, event or occurrence relating to the research and development relating to Tifacogin. This means that even if a particular

53



representation or warranty is not true and accurate as of the applicable measurement date, unless the failure to be true and accurate results in a material adverse effect, such failure will not result in a breach of the merger agreement.

        In addition, several of Chiron's representations and warranties are qualified as to the knowledge of a limited number of members of its senior management, which means that even if a particular representation is not true and accurate, unless certain members of its senior management knew of such failure to be true and accurate, such failure will not result in a breach of the merger agreement.

        The representations and warranties in the merger agreement do not survive the effective time of the merger.

Conduct of Business Pending the Merger

        From the date of the merger agreement to the closing date, Chiron must conduct its business in the ordinary course, and use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact its business organization, maintain existing relations and goodwill with customers, suppliers, distributors, creditors, lessors, employees and business associates and keep available the services of its present key employees and agents.

        In addition, Chiron has agreed, during the same period, not to take any of the following actions without Novartis Corporation's prior consent (which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed):

54


        Under the merger agreement, Novartis Corporation will be deemed to have consented to any action proposed to be taken by Chiron if Novartis Corporation does not withhold its consent, which may not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, for such action within five business days of receiving a request from Chiron to take such action.

55



Actions to be Taken to Complete the Merger

        In the merger agreement, Chiron and Novartis Corporation each agreed to use their respective commercially reasonable efforts to take all necessary action to complete the merger, including preparing all filings and sharing information with each other in order to file all necessary documents with third parties and governmental entities.

        In particular, to obtain antitrust approval, Novartis Corporation will be required, among other things, to sell, license or dispose of assets or businesses of Chiron other than any sales that would, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on Chiron.

        Chiron agreed to convene a stockholders meeting promptly after the SEC's review of this proxy statement, in order for Chiron's stockholders to consider and vote upon the adoption of the merger agreement. Chiron also agreed that its board would recommend that its stockholders vote in favor of adoption of the merger agreement. However, Chiron's board may change its recommendation if the board, based on the recommendation of the independent directors, determines in good faith, after receiving the advice of outside counsel, that making the recommendation would no longer be consistent with its fiduciary duties to Chiron's stockholders. In any event, Chiron must submit the merger agreement to a stockholder vote even if the board changes its recommendation.

        Chiron and Novartis Corporation each agreed to keep the other apprised of the status of matters relating to completion of the merger, including promptly furnishing the other with copies of notice or other communications received by them from any third party or governmental entity with respect to the merger. Chiron agreed to promptly give notice to Novartis Corporation of any change that is reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect to Chiron.

        Subject to applicable laws relating to information sharing, Chiron has agreed to provide Novartis Corporation and its representatives with reasonable access to its properties and records prior to the completion of the merger, and to furnish Novartis Corporation and its representatives all information concerning its business that Novartis Corporation may reasonably request.

        Chiron and Novartis Corporation agreed to consult with each other prior to making any public announcements with respect to the merger, except as may be required by law or by obligations pursuant to any listing agreement with or rules of any national securities exchange, and prior to making any filings with any third party or any governmental entity with respect to the merger.

No Solicitation of Acquisition Proposals

        In the merger agreement, Chiron agrees that neither it, its subsidiaries, nor its or their respective officers, directors, or representatives will solicit or encourage an acquisition proposal or negotiate with or provide any confidential information or data to a third party with respect to an acquisition proposal unless its board or its independent directors determine in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that such action is necessary in order for the directors to comply with their fiduciary duties and (after consultation with financial advisors and counsel) that such acquisition proposal would result in a transaction more favorable to Chiron's stockholders than the merger.

        An "acquisition proposal" is generally defined as any offer with respect to a merger, reorganization, share exchange, consolidation or similar transaction involving Chiron or a purchase of 30% or more of the equity or assets of Chiron and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole.

        If Chiron receives an unsolicited bona fide written acquisition proposal for at least 50% of Chiron's outstanding stock that its board concludes (after consultation with its financial advisor and counsel) in good faith is reasonably likely to be consummated, taking into account all legal, financial, regulatory and other aspects of the proposal, the likelihood of obtaining financing, and the person making the proposal and would, if consummated, be more favorable to Chiron stockholders from a financial point

56



of view than the merger with Novartis Corporation, taking into account any change in the proposal proposed by Novartis Corporation, and if Chiron's board concludes in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel) that such action is necessary in order to comply with its fiduciary duties, then Chiron may (1) provide information in response to a request for information by a third party who has made an unsolicited bona fide written acquisition proposal if Chiron receives an executed confidentiality agreement on customary terms; (2) engage in any negotiations or discussions with any third party who has made an unsolicited bona fide written acquisition proposal if Chiron has received an executed confidentiality agreement as described in (1) above; or (3) withdraw, modify or qualify the recommendation to stockholders. Chiron is required to notify Novartis Corporation at least 3 business days prior to taking any action listed under (3) above. In addition, Chiron is required to notify Novartis Corporation within 24 hours of any acquisition proposal, including the material terms of such proposal, and keep Novartis Corporation informed of significant changes in status and terms of such proposal.

Employee Benefits

        Novartis Corporation has agreed that, following the merger until December 31, 2006, it will provide affected employees of Chiron the same base salary, bonus, incentive compensation (other than equity compensation), pension and welfare benefits under employee benefit plans which are no less favorable in the aggregate to those provided to those employees immediately prior to the merger. Novartis Corporation has agreed to provide affected employees value substantially equivalent to Chiron's proposed equity compensation for 2006 if the merger occurs prior to the grant of such equity compensation. Novartis Corporation has agreed that Chiron may provide awards of deferred share rights/units (a "unit") in the discretion of Chiron's Compensation Committee in lieu of equity grants for the 2006 calendar year (provided, that the aggregate amount of such awards shall not exceed $55,000,000). In addition, Novartis Corporation has agreed to honor (1) determinations with respect to bonus payments for the 2005 calendar year (provided, that the aggregate amount of such bonuses shall not exceed $60,000,000) made by Chiron's compensation committee in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, to the extent such bonus amounts are based on performance meeting previously set targets, and (2) all salary increases based on merit reviews for the 2006 calendar year made by Chiron in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, to the extent not in effect at the time of the merger.

        Novartis Corporation has agreed to give affected employees full credit for prior service with Chiron for purposes of eligibility, vesting and benefit accrual (but not for purposes of benefit accrual under defined benefit pension plans or for any new program for which credit for prior service is not given to similarly situated employees of Novartis Corporation) under the Novartis Corporation employee benefit plans except to the extent it would result in a duplication of accrual of benefits. In addition, affected employees will be eligible to participate in all the Novartis Corporation employee benefit plans without any waiting time and Novartis Corporation will cause all pre-existing conditions exclusions under such plans to be waived.

        For a period of one year following the merger Novartis Corporation has agreed to honor Chiron's severance plans and agreements in effect at the time of the merger and severance benefits shall be determined without taking into account any reduction in compensation paid to affected employees following the merger.

        An affected employee is an employee of Chiron at the time of the merger; however, except for employees whose primary place of employment is located in the United Kingdom or the United States, certain of the foregoing provisions do not apply in jurisdictions providing statutory severance and benefits.

        See "Special Factors—Interests of Chiron's Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger."

57



Indemnification of Officers and Directors

        Novartis Corporation and the surviving corporation will indemnify the current directors and officers of Chiron and its subsidiaries to the fullest extent provided by law. In addition, for a period of six years after the closing of the merger, Novartis Corporation will cause the surviving corporation to maintain liability insurance for Chiron's current directors and officers on terms with respect to coverage and amount no less favorable to the directors and officers than those of the current policy, but the surviving corporation will not be required to pay an annual premium amount in excess 250% of the current annual premiums. See "Special Factors—Interests of Chiron's Directors and of Executive Officers in the Merger."

Closing Conditions

        The merger agreement contains the following conditions for both Novartis Corporation and us:

        Other than adoption of the merger agreement by a majority of the outstanding shares of Chiron common stock not owned by Novartis AG or its subsidiaries, none of the foregoing conditions may be waived by Novartis Corporation or us. The merger agreement contains the following additional conditions to the obligations of Novartis Corporation to close, any of which may be waived by Novartis Corporation:

58


        The merger agreement contains the following additional conditions to the obligations of Chiron to close, any of which may be waived by Chiron:

Termination

        The merger agreement may be terminated:

59


        In the event of a termination of the merger agreement and the abandonment of the merger, the merger agreement shall become void and of no effect with no liability on the part of any party to the agreement (or of any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, legal and financial advisors or other representatives). However, a party may still be liable for damages resulting from any willful or intentional breach of the merger agreement.

Amendment of the Merger Agreement

        Prior to the effective time of the merger, the merger agreement may be amended, modified or supplemented by a written amendment signed by Chiron (approved by the independent directors), Novartis Corporation, Novartis Biotech and Novartis AG and any provisions of the merger agreement may be waived only in writing executed by the party or parties against whom the waiver is asserted (in the case of Chiron, approved by the independent directors).

Assignment

        Under the merger agreement, Novartis Corporation has the right to substitute another subsidiary to be a constituent corporation in lieu of Novartis Biotech.

Expenses

        All costs and expenses will be paid by the party incurring them, with the exception that costs and expenses related to printing, filing and mailing the Schedule 13E-3 and this proxy statement will be shared equally by Novartis Corporation and Chiron. See "Special Factors—Fees and Expenses" on page 47.

60



STOCK OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND
CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

Ownership of Major Stockholders

        The following table sets forth certain information known to us with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of December 31, 2005 by each person known by us to be a beneficial owner of five percent or more of our common stock and based on 196,596,281 shares of Chiron common stock issued and outstanding on December 31, 2005.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

  Outstanding
Number of Shares(1)

  Percent of Total Shares
 
Novartis AG
    35 Lichstrasse
    CH-4002
    Basel, Switzerland
  86,216,630 (2) 43.9 %
CAM/Smith Barney/TIMCO/Salomon
    399 Park Avenue
    New York, NY 10022
  23,364,103 (3) 11.9  

Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

        This table shows the amount of Chiron common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2005 by: (a) each of the directors, (b) the Chief Executive Officer and the four other most highly compensated officers of Chiron, or named executive officers (other than John A. Lambert, who resigned effective February 28, 2005), and (c) the directors and executive officers of Chiron as a group. "Beneficial ownership" is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally refers to shares that a director or executive officer has the power to vote, or the power to dispose of, and stock options or share rights that are exercisable currently or become exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2005. As of December 31, 2005, there were 196,596,281 shares of Chiron common stock issued and outstanding. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each of the individuals named below is: c/o Chiron Corporation, 4560 Horton Street, Emeryville, California 94608.

 
  Shares Beneficially Owned
 
Name of Beneficial Owner

 
  Number(4),(5)
  Percent
 
Directors:          
Raymund Breu   65,216   *  
Vaughn D. Bryson   72,387   *  
Lewis W. Coleman   97,206   *  
Pierre E. Douaze   63,939   *  
J. Richard Fredericks   48,758   *  
Paul L. Herrling   79,137   *  
Denise M. O'Leary   51,802   *  
Edward E. Penhoet   251,124   *  
Howard H. Pien(6)   650,713   *  
Pieter J. Strijkert   75,895   *  

Named Executive Officer:

 

 

 

 

 
Jack Goldstein   377,350   *  
David V. Smith   119,148   *  
Craig A. Wheeler   437,566   *  
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (21 persons)   3,050,364   1.6 %

*
Represents holdings of less than one percent.

61


(1)
This disclosure is made pursuant to certain rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC and the number of shares shown as being beneficially owned may not be deemed to be beneficially owned for other purposes. Except as subject to applicable community property laws or indicated by footnote below, the persons named in this table have sole voting and/or investment power with respect to all shares.

(2)
Includes 6,896,552 shares of common stock acquired by a subsidiary of Novartis AG pursuant to Chiron's exercise of its right under the subscription agreement with Novartis.

(3)
Includes 14,472,483 shares held by CAM North America, LLC, 8,773,465 shares held by Smith Barney Fund Management LLC, 21,177 shares held by TIMCO Asset Management Inc. and 96,978 shares held by Salomon Brothers Asset Management Inc pursuant to a Schedule 13G jointly filed by such entities with the SEC on January 10, 2006.

(4)
These amounts include shares that the persons named in this table have a right to acquire as of December 31, 2005, or within 60 days after that date, through the exercise of stock options, or the vesting of share rights awards, as follows: Dr. Breu, 50,497 shares; Mr. Bryson, 60,294 shares; Mr. Coleman, 64,586 shares; Mr. Douaze, 45,787 shares; Mr. Fredericks, 39,379 shares; Dr. Herrling, 61,777 shares; Ms. O'Leary, 40,901 shares; Dr. Penhoet, 44,767 shares; Dr. Strijkert, 55,115 shares; Mr. Pien, 622,500 shares; Dr. Goldstein, 323,833 shares; Mr. Smith, 114,750 shares; and Mr. Wheeler, 430,525 shares; and all directors and executive officers as a group, 2,581,289 shares.

(5)
These amounts do not include the following number of shares of Chiron's common stock issuable pursuant to share rights awards which may vest more than 60 days after December 31, 2005, to the following persons:

(a)
directors, as follows: Dr. Breu, 0 shares; Mr. Bryson, 0 shares; Mr. Coleman, 0 shares; Mr. Douaze, 0 shares; Mr. Fredericks, 0 shares; Dr. Herrling, 0 shares; Ms. O'Leary, 0 shares; Dr. Penhoet, 0 shares; and Dr. Strijkert, 0 shares.

(b)
certain named executive officers, as follows: Mr. Pien, 25,000 shares; Dr. Goldstein, 50,000 shares; Mr. Smith, 900 shares; Mr. Wheeler, 0 shares; and all executive officers as a group, 83,890 shares.

(6)
Mr. Pien is also a named executive officer.

62



STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

        A 2006 annual meeting of stockholders will be held only if the merger agreement is not adopted by our stockholders or the merger is not otherwise completed. Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act requires that we include certain stockholder proposals in our proxy statement for an annual stockholders' meeting if the proposal is submitted prior to the deadline calculated under the rule. If stockholders desire their proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement relating to the next annual stockholders' meeting (which will be held only if the merger is not completed), we must receive the proposal in a reasonable time before we begin to print our proxy materials. We expect that this reasonable time would not exceed 120 calendar days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

        If a stockholder desires a matter to be considered at an annual meeting and his or her proposal is not submitted for inclusion in our proxy statement by the deadline described above, the matter could still be considered at the meeting if the notice procedures outlined in our bylaws are followed. Information regarding the matter would not, however, be contained in our proxy statement relating to the meeting. Our bylaws provide that only stockholders of record entitled to vote at an annual meeting of stockholders may nominate a person for election to the board of directors or propose other business to be considered by the stockholders at an annual meeting. These stockholders must send us a written notice of the nomination or proposal. Because the date of an annual meeting, if an annual meeting is held, would be more than sixty days after the anniversary date of last year's annual meeting, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be delivered not earlier than the ninetieth day prior to the date of the annual meeting and not later than the later of the sixtieth day prior to the date of the annual meeting or the tenth day after public announcement of the date of the meeting. We have filed our bylaws with, and a copy of these bylaws can be obtained from, the SEC.

        Please address all notices to the Corporate Secretary, Chiron Corporation, 4560 Horton Street, Emeryville, California 94608.

63



SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

        The following table sets forth summary historical consolidated financial data for Chiron as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 and as of and for each of the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.

        This data and the comparative per share data set forth below have been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the audited consolidated financial statements and other financial information contained in Chiron's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the unaudited consolidated interim financial information contained in Chiron's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2005, including the notes thereto. These documents are incorporated by reference in this proxy statement. See "Where You Can Find More Information" on page 70.

 
  Nine Months Ended September 30,
   
   
 
  Year Ended December 31,
 
   
  2004
Restated

 
  2005
  2004
  2003
 
  (unaudited)

   
   
 
  (In thousands, except per share amounts and ratios)

Income Statement Data:                        
  Net sales and other operating revenue   $ 1,305,726   $ 1,288,960   $ 1,723,355   $ 1,766,361
  Total expenses (excluding income taxes)     1,293,009     1,203,065     1,673,550     1,475,288
  Income from continuing operations     42,418     77,186     54,063     220,338
  Net income     42,418     102,040     78,917     227,313
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges:     2.70X     4.91X     2.88X     9.89X
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):                        
  Current assets   $ 1,442,122         $ 1,394,023   $ 1,257,649
  Non-current assets     2,774,684           2,911,480     2,937,520
  Current liabilities     459,522           434,444     436,913
  Non-current liabilities     1,236,609           1,269,355     1,313,896
  Stockholders' equity     2,520,675           2,601,704     2,444,360


Comparative Per Share Data

        The following table sets forth certain historical per share data for Chiron. Basic and diluted earnings per common share and book value per share is presented for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 and for each of the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.

 
  Nine Months Ended September 30,
  Year Ended December 31,
 
  2005
  2004
Restated

  2004
  2003
 
  (unaudited)

   
   
   
Income from continuing operations per share:                        
  Basic   $ 0.23   $ 0.41   $ 0.29   $ 1.18
  Diluted   $ 0.22   $ 0.40   $ 0.28   $ 1.15
Net income per share:                        
  Basic   $ 0.23   $ 0.54   $ 0.42   $ 1.22
  Diluted   $ 0.22   $ 0.53   $ 0.41   $ 1.19
Weighted average common shares outstanding     187,564           187,545     186,835
Weighted average common shares outstanding, plus impact from assumed conversions     189,064           190,202     193,915
Book value per diluted share:     13.33           13.68     12.61

64



MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION

        Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Stock Market, or Nasdaq, under the symbol "CHIR." The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low closing sale prices of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq:

 
  High
  Low
2004            
  First Quarter   $ 56.38   $ 44.01
  Second Quarter     48.59     42.25
  Third Quarter     48.01     42.38
  Fourth Quarter     45.42     30.76
2005            
  First Quarter     38.63     32.61
  Second Quarter     38.25     33.83
  Third Quarter     44.34     34.96
  Fourth Quarter     44.85     42.66
2006            
  First Quarter (through January 6, 2006)     44.63     44.79

        On January 9, 2006, the closing sale price of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq was $44.78 per share.

        We do not pay any dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain earnings, if any, for use in our business and do not anticipate paying cash dividends to holders of our common stock.


FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS

        We include in this proxy statement the following projections because they were provided to the non-Novartis directors, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley. Novartis AG was provided with our 2004 long-range plan. The projections included herein were based on Chiron's 2004 long-range plan using customary biotechnology financial analysis providing for probabilities of success based on the stage of development of individual product candidates and, with respect to product candidates, include information with respect to product candidates in pre-clinical development, as well as those in clinical development. In order to be prepared to respond to any offer from Novartis, and as described under "Special Factors—Background of the Merger," the non-Novartis directors directed Chiron management to update the 2004 long-range plan. In the spring of 2005, Chiron's executive management team (without involving less senior members of management for confidentiality purposes) undertook this update by, among other things, analyzing and updating the key assumptions underlying the 2004 long-range plan and revising the projections contained in the plan accordingly. In addition, again at the direction of the non-Novartis directors, further updates were made by Chiron's executive management team in early September 2005 resulting from events that had taken place since the spring of 2005. The projections, in their updated form, were presented to the non-Novartis directors most recently prior to the execution of the merger agreement on September 4, 2005. The projections were not prepared with a view toward public disclosure or compliance with published guidelines of the Securities and Exchange Commission or the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants regarding forward-looking information or generally accepted accounting principles. Neither Chiron's independent auditors nor any other independent accountants have compiled, examined or performed any procedures with respect to the prospective financial information contained in the projections, nor have they expressed any opinion or given any form of assurance on the projections or their achievability. The non-Novartis directors and

65



the board generally, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley may have varied some of the assumptions underlying the projections for purposes of their analyses. Furthermore, the projections:

        Chiron's management prepared the updated long-range plan. The projections in the plan do not reflect any of the effects of the merger or other changes that may in the future be deemed appropriate concerning Chiron and its assets, business, operations, properties, policies, corporate structure, capitalization or management in light of the circumstances then existing. Chiron believes the assumptions Chiron's management used as a basis for the projections were reasonable at the time the projections were prepared, given the information Chiron's management had at the time.

        The projections are not a guarantee of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The future financial results and stockholder value of Chiron may materially differ from those expressed in the projections due to factors that are beyond Chiron's ability to control or predict. We cannot assure you that the projections will be realized or that Chiron's future financial results will not materially vary from the projections. We do not intend to update or revise the projections.

        The projections are forward-looking statements. For information on factors which may cause Chiron's future financial results to materially vary, see "Forward-Looking Statements" beginning on page 69.

66


        The material portions of the projections are set forth below:

 
  Fiscal Year Ending December 31,
 
(all dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

 
  2006
  2007
  2008
  2009
  2010
  2011
  2012
  2013
  2014
  2015
 
Total revenue   $ 2,222.2   $ 2,436.6   $ 2,675.3   $ 3,183.9   $ 3,663.4   $ 4,010.1   $ 4,254.1   $ 4,080.7   $ 4,161.4   $ 4,211.1  
  % Growth     11.9 %   9.6 %   9.8 %   19.0 %   15.1 %   9.5 %   6.1 %   4.1 %   2.0 %   1.2 %

Cost of goods sold

 

 

833.8

 

 

891.9

 

 

971.4

 

 

1,132.4

 

 

1,221.6

 

 

1,345.5

 

 

1,417.5

 

 

1,446.4

 

 

1,483.7

 

 

1,405.2

 
  % Growth     15.2 %   7.0 %   8.9 %   16.6 %   7.9 %   10.1 %   5.3 %   2.0 %   2.6 %   -5.3 %

Gross profit

 

 

1,388.5

 

 

1,544.7

 

 

1,703.9

 

 

2,051.5

 

 

2,441.8

 

 

2,664.5

 

 

2,836.6

 

 

2,634.4

 

 

2,677.7

 

 

2,805.9

 
  % Margin     62.5 %   63.4 %   63.7 %   64.4 %   66.7 %   66.4 %   66.7 %   64.6 %   64.3 %   66.6 %

Research and development expenses

 

 

482.2

 

 

503.9

 

 

537.7

 

 

502.9

 

 

514.2

 

 

556.1

 

 

601.4

 

 

603.2

 

 

613.7

 

 

627.8

 
  % Margin     21.7 %   20.7 %   20.1 %   15.8 %   14.0 %   13.9 %   14.1 %   14.8 %   14.7 %   14.9 %
  % Growth     11.0 %   4.5 %   6.7 %   -6.5 %   2.2 %   8.1 %   8.2 %   0.3 %   1.7 %   2.3 %

Sales and marketing expenses

 

 

300.8

 

 

326.1

 

 

395.8

 

 

439.4

 

 

471.8

 

 

502.8

 

 

509.6

 

 

498.0

 

 

512.6

 

 

526.8

 
  % Margin     13.5 %   13.4 %   14.8 %   13.8 %   12.9 %   12.5 %   12.0 %   12.2 %   12.3 %   12.5 %
  % Growth     6.0 %   8.4 %   21.4 %   11.0 %   7.4 %   6.6 %   1.3 %   -2.3 %   2.9 %   2.8 %

General and administrative expenses

 

 

202.0

 

 

210.5

 

 

223.3

 

 

244.9

 

 

267.2

 

 

290.4

 

 

316.2

 

 

315.7

 

 

328.4

 

 

339.7

 
  % Margin     9.1 %   8.6 %   8.3 %   7.7 %   7.3 %   7.2 %   7.4 %   7.7 %   7.9 %   8.1 %
  % Growth     9.7 %   4.2 %   6.1 %   9.7 %   9.1 %   8.7 %   8.9 %   -0.2 %   4.0 %   3.5 %

Other expenses

 

 

14.1

 

 

14.5

 

 

9.6

 

 

1.3

 

 

0.4

 

 

0.4

 

 

0.4

 

 

0.4

 

 

0.4

 

 

0.4

 
  % Growth     40.7 %   2.5 %   -33.5 %   -86.7 %   -66.5 %   -0.6 %   0.0 %   0.0 %   0.0 %   0.0 %

EBITDA(1)

 

 

546.8

 

 

649.0

 

 

701.9

 

 

1,048.5

 

 

1,367.7

 

 

1,515.8

 

 

1,621.4

 

 

1,435.5

 

 

1,432.6

 

 

1,535.5

 
  % Margin     24.6 %   26.6 %   26.2 %   32.9 %   37.3 %   37.8 %   38.1 %   35.2 %   34.4 %   36.5 %

Depreciation

 

 

127.2

 

 

129.8

 

 

136.6

 

 

159.7

 

 

167.0

 

 

190.8

 

 

205.3

 

 

212.1

 

 

205.5

 

 

220.3

 

Amortization

 

 

30.2

 

 

29.5

 

 

27.8

 

 

25.8

 

 

12.4

 

 

10.3

 

 

7.2

 

 

6.3

 

 

4.5

 

 

4.1

 

Operating income

 

 

389.4

 

 

489.7

 

 

537.5

 

 

863.1

 

 

1,188.2

 

 

1,314.8

 

 

1,408.9

 

 

1,217.1

 

 

1,222.5

 

 

1,311.1

 
  % Margin     17.5 %   20.1 %   20.1 %   27.1 %   32.4 %   32.8 %   33.1 %   29.8 %   29.4 %   31.1 %
  % Growth     25.3 %   25.8 %   9.7 %   60.6 %   37.7 %   10.7 %   7.2 %   -13.6 %   0.4 %   7.2 %

Net other income

 

 

29.1

 

 

19.6

 

 

11.6

 

 

10.1

 

 

15.7

 

 

41.8

 

 

64.8

 

 

81.9

 

 

89.0

 

 

89.0

 

Minority interest

 

 

(3.0

)

 

(3.0

)

 

(3.0

)

 

(3.0

)

 

(3.0

)

 

(3.0

)

 

(3.0

)

 

(3.0

)

 

(3.0

)

 

(3.0

)

Pre-tax income

 

 

415.5

 

 

506.3

 

 

546.0

 

 

870.1

 

 

1,200.9

 

 

1,353.6

 

 

1,470.7

 

 

11,296.0

 

 

1,308.6

 

 

1,397.1

 
  % Margin     18.7 %   20.8 %   20.4 %   27.3 %   32.8 %   33.8 %   34.6 %   31.8 %   31.4 %   33.2 %

Income tax expense

 

 

(103.9

)

 

(126.6

)

 

(136.5

)

 

(217.5

)

 

(300.2

)

 

(338.4

)

 

(367.7

)

 

(324.0

)

 

(327.1

)

 

(349.3

)
  Effective tax rate     25.0 %   25.0 %   25.0 %   25.0 %   25.0 %   25.0 %   25.0 %   25.0 %   25.0 %   25.0 %

Net income

 

$

311.6

 

$

379.8

 

$

409.5

 

$

652.6

 

$

900.7

 

$

1,015.2

 

$

1,103.1

 

$

972.0

 

$

981.4

 

$

1,047.8

 

Shares outstanding

 

 

197.5

 

 

198.7

 

 

199.5

 

 

200.4

 

 

202.1

 

 

203.5

 

 

204.5

 

 

205.5

 

 

206.4

 

 

207.4

 

Earnings per share

 

$

1.58

 

$

1.91

 

$

2.05

 

$

3.26

 

$

4.46

 

$

4.99

 

$

5.39

 

$

4.73

 

$

4.75

 

$

5.05

 

(1)
EBITDA represents income from operations before interest expenses, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is not a substitute for net income. However, Chiron believes that EBITDA provides useful information as part of its evaluation of operating performance.

67



OTHER MATTERS

        Chiron knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the special meeting. If any other matters properly come before the special meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy to vote the shares they represent in accordance with their best judgment. Discretionary authority with respect to such other matters is granted by the execution of the enclosed proxy.

68



FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        This proxy statement, and the documents to which we refer you in this proxy statement, contain certain forward-looking statements. Any statements in this proxy statement or those other documents about future results of operations, expectations, plans and prospects, including statements regarding completion of the proposed merger, constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements also include those preceded or followed by the words "anticipates," "believes," "could," "estimates," "expects," "intends," "may," "should," "plans," "targets" and/or similar words or expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on Chiron's current estimates and assumptions and, as such, involve uncertainty and risk.

        Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements contained herein, which speak only as of the date of this proxy statement, or, in the case of documents incorporated by reference, attached to this proxy statement or referred to in this proxy statement, as of the respective dates of such documents. These and other factors are discussed in the documents that are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement, including Chiron's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2005. In addition to other factors and matters contained or incorporated in this document, we believe the following factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements:

69



WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

        Chiron is subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. We file reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC.

        Novartis AG is a foreign private issuer as defined in Exchange Act Rule 3b-4 and is subject to the Exchange Act reporting requirements applicable to foreign private issuers. In accordance therewith, it files periodic reports and other information with the SEC relating to its business, financial condition and other matters.

        You may read and copy these reports, proxy statements and other information at the SEC's Public Reference Section at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet website, located at http://www.sec.gov, which contains reports, proxy statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC.

        The SEC allows Chiron to "incorporate by reference" information into this proxy statement. This means that Chiron can disclose important information by referring to another document filed separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this proxy statement. This proxy statement and the information that Chiron later files with the SEC may update and supersede the information incorporated by reference. Similarly, the information that Chiron later files with the SEC may update and supersede the information in this proxy statement. Chiron incorporates by reference each document it files under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the date of the initial filing of this proxy statement and before the special meeting. Chiron also incorporates by reference into this proxy statement the following documents filed by it with the SEC under the Exchange Act:

        Filings by Chiron:

        Chiron undertakes to provide without charge to each person to whom a copy of this proxy statement has been delivered, upon request, by first class mail or other equally prompt means, within one business day of receipt of the request, a copy of any or all of the documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement, other than the exhibits to these documents, unless the exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference into the information that this proxy statement incorporates. Requests for copies of Chiron filings should be directed to Chiron Entertainment Corporation, Chiron Corporation, 4560 Horton Street, Emeryville, California 94608, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

        Document requests from Chiron should be made by                    , 2006 in order to receive them before the special meeting.

        The proxy statement does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, or the solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction to or from any person to whom it is not lawful to make any offer or solicitation in that jurisdiction. The delivery of this proxy statement should not create an implication that there has been no change in the affairs of Chiron since the date of this proxy statement or that the information herein is correct as of any later date.

        Shareholders should not rely on information other than that contained or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement. Chiron has not authorized anyone to provide information that is

70


different from that contained in this proxy statement. This proxy statement is dated                    , 2006. No assumption should be made that the information contained in this proxy statement is accurate as of any date other than that date, and the mailing of this proxy statement will not create any implication to the contrary.

        If you have questions about the special meeting or the merger after reading this proxy, or if you would like additional copies of this proxy statement or the proxy card, you should contact Chiron Corporation, 4560 Horton Street, Emeryville, California 94608, Attention: Corporate Secretary. You may call our proxy solicitor Innisfree M&A, Incorporated toll-free at 888-750-5835 (bankers and brokers may call collect at 212-750-5833), or Novartis' proxy solicitor Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. toll-free at 877-278-4774 (bankers and brokers may call collect at 212-440-9800).

71


Annex A

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
by and among
NOVARTIS CORPORATION,

NOVARTIS BIOTECH PARTNERSHIP, INC.,
a subsidiary of Novartis Corporation,

CHIRON CORPORATION
and, for purposes of Section 10.14 only, NOVARTIS AG
Dated as of October 30, 2005



TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
   
  Page
ARTICLE I   The Merger; Closing; Effective Time   A-1

 

 

1.1.

 

The Merger

 

A-1
    1.2.   Closing   A-1
    1.3.   Effective Time   A-2

ARTICLE II

 

Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Surviving Corporation

 

A-2

 

 

2.1.

 

The Certificate of Incorporation

 

A-2
    2.2.   The By-Laws   A-2

ARTICLE III

 

Officers and Directors of the Surviving Corporation

 

A-2

 

 

3.1.

 

Directors

 

A-2
    3.2.   Officers   A-2

ARTICLE IV

 

Effect of the Merger on Capital Stock; Exchange of Certificates

 

A-2

 

 

4.1.

 

Effect on Capital Stock

 

A-2
    4.2.   Surrender of Certificates for Payment   A-3
    4.3.   Dissenters' Rights   A-4
    4.4.   Adjustments to Prevent Dilution   A-4
    4.5.   Treatment of Company Options/Other Equity Awards   A-4

ARTICLE V

 

Representations and Warranties of the Company

 

A-5

 

 

5.1.

 

Organization, Good Standing and Qualification

 

A-5
    5.2.   Capitalization of the Company and its Subsidiaries   A-6
    5.3.   Corporate Authority; Approval and Fairness   A-7
    5.4.   Consents and Approvals; No Violations   A-8
    5.5.   Compliance with Laws; Licenses   A-9
    5.6.   No Default   A-9
    5.7.   Company Reports; Financial Statements   A-9
    5.8.   No Undisclosed Material Liabilities   A-10
    5.9.   Litigation   A-11
    5.10.   Material Contracts   A-11
    5.11.   Absence of Certain Changes or Events   A-11
    5.12.   Employee Benefit Plans   A-11
    5.13.   Intellectual Property   A-12
    5.14.   Taxes   A-13
    5.15.   Takeover Statutes; Charter Provisions   A-13
    5.16.   Opinions of Financial Advisors   A-13
    5.17.   Brokers   A-14
             

A-i



ARTICLE VI

 

Representations and Warranties of Novartis and Merger Sub

 

A-14

 

 

6.1.

 

Organization, Good Standing and Qualification

 

A-14
    6.2.   Authority Relative to This Agreement   A-14
    6.3.   Consents and Approvals; No Violations   A-14
    6.4.   Merger Sub   A-14
    6.5.   Financing   A-14

ARTICLE VII

 

Covenants

 

A-15

 

 

7.1.

 

Interim Operations

 

A-15
    7.2.   Acquisition Proposals   A-17
    7.3.   Stockholder Meeting; Proxy Material; Recommendation   A-18
    7.4.   Commercially Reasonable Efforts; Cooperation   A-19
    7.5.   Access   A-21
    7.6.   Consents   A-21
    7.7.   Public Announcements   A-22
    7.8.   Employee Benefits   A-22
    7.9.   Indemnification; Directors' and Officers' Insurance   A-23
    7.10.   Takeover Statutes   A-24
    7.11.   Retention of Shares; Voting of Shares at Stockholders Meeting   A-24

ARTICLE VIII

 

Conditions

 

A-25

 

 

8.1.

 

Conditions to the Obligations of the Company, Novartis and Merger Sub to Effect the Merger

 

A-25
    8.2.   Conditions to Obligations of Novartis and Merger Sub   A-25
    8.3.   Conditions to Obligation of the Company   A-26

ARTICLE IX

 

Termination

 

A-27

 

 

9.1.

 

Termination by Mutual Consent

 

A-27
    9.2.   Termination by Either Novartis or the Company   A-27
    9.3.   Termination by the Company   A-27
    9.4.   Termination by Novartis   A-27
    9.5.   Effect of Termination and Abandonment   A-27

ARTICLE X

 

Miscellaneous and General

 

A-28

 

 

10.1.

 

Non-Survival of Representations and Warranties and Agreements

 

A-28
    10.2.   Modification or Amendment   A-28
    10.3.   Waiver of Conditions   A-28
    10.4.   Definitions   A-28
    10.5.   Counterparts   A-28
    10.6.   Governing Law and Venue; Waiver of Jury Trial   A-28
    10.7.   Notices   A-29
    10.8.   Entire Agreement   A-30
    10.9.   No Third Party Beneficiaries   A-30
    10.10.   Severability   A-30
    10.11.   Interpretation; Absence of Presumption   A-30
    10.12.   Expenses   A-30
    10.13.   Assignment   A-31
    10.14.   Parent Guarantee   A-31

ANNEX A

 

Defined Terms

 

A-33

A-ii


AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

        AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this "Agreement"), dated as of October 30, 2005, by and among Novartis Corporation, a New York corporation ("Novartis") and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Novartis AG, a stock corporation organized under the laws of Switzerland ("Parent"), Novartis Biotech Partnership, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a subsidiary of Novartis ("Merger Sub"), Chiron Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and, for purposes of Section 10.14 only, Parent.

RECITALS

        WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, Parent, together with certain of its direct and indirect Subsidiaries (as defined below), owns 79,320,078 shares of the common stock, par value $0.01 par share, of the Company ("Common Stock");

        WHEREAS, the Independent Directors (as defined in the Governance Agreement, dated as of November 20, 1994, as amended, by and among Parent (as successor in interest to Ciba-Geigy Limited), Novartis, and the Company (the "Governance Agreement")) of the board of directors of the Company (the "Company Board") have recommended to the Company Board that the Company Board adopt this Agreement;

        WHEREAS, the Company Board has duly approved and declared advisable this Agreement and the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company (the "Merger") upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement;

        WHEREAS, the boards of directors of each of Parent, Novartis and Merger Sub have adopted this Agreement;

        WHEREAS, Novartis, as the sole shareholder in Merger Sub, has approved the Merger; and

        WHEREAS, the Company, Parent, Novartis and Merger Sub desire to make those representations, warranties, covenants and agreements specified herein in connection with this Agreement.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, Parent, Novartis, Merger Sub and the Company agree as follows:

ARTICLE I
The Merger; Closing; Effective Time

        1.1.    The Merger.    Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, at the Effective Time (as defined below), Merger Sub shall be merged with and into the Company and the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub shall thereupon cease. The Company shall be the surviving corporation in the Merger (sometimes hereinafter referred to as the "Surviving Corporation"), and the separate corporate existence of the Company with all its rights, privileges, immunities, powers and franchises shall continue unaffected by the Merger, except as set forth in Article II of this Agreement. The Merger shall have the effects specified in the Delaware General Corporation Law, as amended (the "DGCL").

        1.2.    Closing.    Unless otherwise mutually agreed in writing between Novartis and the Company, the closing for the Merger (the "Closing") shall take place at the offices of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, 51 West 52nd Street, New York, New York 10019, at 9:00 A.M. local time on the third Business Day (the "Closing Date") following the day on which the last to be satisfied or waived of the conditions set forth in Article VIII (other than those conditions that by their nature are to be satisfied at the Closing, but subject to the satisfaction or waiver of those conditions) shall be satisfied or waived in

A-1



accordance with this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, "Business Day" means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday, Federal holiday or any other day on which banking institutions in New York City are authorized or obligated by Law to be closed.

        1.3.    Effective Time.    As soon as practicable following the Closing, Novartis and the Company will cause a Certificate of Merger (the "Certificate of Merger") to be executed, acknowledged and filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware as provided in Section 251 of the DGCL. The Merger shall become effective at the time when the Certificate of Merger has been duly filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware or at such later time as may be agreed by the parties in writing and specified in the Delaware Certificate of Merger (the "Effective Time").

ARTICLE II
Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws
of the Surviving Corporation

        2.1.    The Certificate of Incorporation.    The certificate of incorporation of Merger Sub in effect at the Effective Time shall be the certificate of incorporation of the Surviving Corporation (the "Charter"), until thereafter amended as provided therein or by applicable Law.

        2.2.    The By-Laws.    The by-laws of Merger Sub in effect at the Effective Time shall be the by-laws of the Surviving Corporation (the "By-Laws"), until thereafter amended as provided therein or in accordance with the Charter and applicable Law.

ARTICLE III
Officers and Directors
of the Surviving Corporation

        3.1.    Directors.    The directors of Merger Sub at the Effective Time shall, from and after the Effective Time, be the directors of the Surviving Corporation until their successors have been duly elected or appointed and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal in accordance with the Charter and the By-Laws.

        3.2.    Officers.    The officers of the Company at the Effective Time shall, from and after the Effective Time, be the officers of the Surviving Corporation until their successors have been duly elected or appointed and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal in accordance with the Charter and the By-Laws.

ARTICLE IV
Effect of the Merger on Capital Stock;
Exchange of Certificates

        4.1.    Effect on Capital Stock.    At the Effective Time, as a result of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder of any capital stock of the Company:

A-2


        4.2.    Surrender of Certificates for Payment.    

A-3


        4.3.    Dissenters' Rights.    Any Person who otherwise would be deemed a Dissenting Stockholder shall not be entitled to receive the Merger Consideration with respect to the shares of Common Stock owned by such Person unless and until such Person shall have failed to perfect or shall have effectively withdrawn or lost such holder's right to dissent from the Merger under the DGCL. Each Dissenting Stockholder shall be entitled to receive only the payment provided by Section 262 of the DGCL with respect to shares of Common Stock owned by such Dissenting Stockholder and as to which dissenters' rights have been properly perfected. The Company shall give Novartis (i) prompt notice of any written demands for appraisal, attempted withdrawals of such demands, and any other instruments served pursuant to applicable Law received by the Company relating to stockholders' rights of appraisal, and (ii) the opportunity to direct all negotiations and proceedings with respect to demand for appraisal under the DGCL. The Company shall not, except with the prior written consent of Novartis, voluntarily make any payment with respect to any demands for appraisals of Dissenting Shares, offer to settle or settle any such demands or approve any withdrawal of any such demands.

        4.4.    Adjustments to Prevent Dilution.    In the event that the Company changes the number of shares of Common Stock, or securities convertible or exchangeable into or exercisable for shares of Common Stock, issued and outstanding prior to the Effective Time as a result of a reclassification, stock split (including a reverse stock split), stock dividend or distribution, recapitalization, merger, subdivision, issuer tender or exchange offer, or other similar transaction, the Merger Consideration shall be equitably adjusted to reflect such change.

        4.5.    Treatment of Company Options/Other Equity Awards.    

A-4


ARTICLE V
Representations and Warranties of the Company

        Except as set forth in (i) the Company Reports (as defined below) filed prior to the date hereof or (ii) the applicable section of the disclosure schedule delivered by the Company to Novartis on the date hereof (the "Company Disclosure Schedule") (it being understood that any matter disclosed pursuant to any section or subsection of the Company Disclosure Schedule shall be deemed to be disclosed for all purposes of this Agreement and the Company Disclosure Schedule, as long as the relevance of such disclosure is reasonably apparent), the Company hereby represents and warrants to Novartis and Merger Sub as follows:

        5.1.    Organization, Good Standing and Qualification.    Each of the Company and its Subsidiaries is a corporation or other legal entity duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the Laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation or organization and has all requisite corporate or other business entity power and authority to own, lease and operate its properties and assets and to carry on its businesses as now being conducted and is qualified to do business and is in good standing as a foreign corporation or other business entity in each jurisdiction where the ownership, leasing or operation of its properties or assets or conduct of its business requires such qualification, except where the failure to be so qualified or in good standing or to have such power or authority, would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect (as defined below) or to prevent, impede or materially delay the ability of the Company to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby or to perform its obligations hereunder. The Company has heretofore made available to Novartis accurate and complete copies of the certificate of incorporation and by-laws and other organizational documents, as currently in effect, of the Company and each of its Significant Subsidiaries.

        As used in this Agreement, "Subsidiary" shall mean, with respect to any party, any corporation or other organization, whether incorporated or unincorporated or domestic or foreign to the United States, of which (x) such party or any other Subsidiary of such party is a general partner or (y) at least a majority of the securities (or other interests having by their terms ordinary voting power to elect a

A-5



majority of the board of directors or others performing similar functions with respect to such corporation or other organization) is, directly or indirectly, owned or controlled by such party or by any one or more of its Subsidiaries, or by such party and one or more of its Subsidiaries.

        As used in this Agreement, "Significant Subsidiary" shall mean, with respect to any party, any corporation or other organization, whether incorporated or unincorporated or domestic or foreign to the United States, which is a "significant subsidiary" within the meaning of Regulation S-X promulgated under the Securities Act.

        As used in this Agreement, "Company Material Adverse Effect" shall mean any material adverse effect on the business, financial condition or results of operations of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole; provided, however, that Company Material Adverse Effect shall not include any effect to the extent resulting from (1) any change, development, circumstance, event, or occurrence generally affecting the industries in which the Company or its Subsidiaries operate, except to the extent the Company or its Subsidiaries are affected in a disproportionate manner as compared to other similar companies in the industries in which the Company or its Subsidiaries operate, (2) any change in general economic or political conditions, (3) any change in Law or GAAP or interpretations thereof, (4) the direct impact of the announcement or performance of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby (including the direct impact of this Agreement on relationships with employees, customers, suppliers and distributors), (5) any change, development, circumstance, event or occurrence relating to the revenues to be derived from sales of Fluvirin for the 2005-2006 influenza season, or (6) any change, development, circumstance, event or occurrence relating to the research and development relating to Tifacogin.

        As used in this Agreement, "Knowledge of the Company" shall mean the knowledge, after reasonable inquiry, of the following employees of the Company: the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, the General Counsel, the heads of each of the blood testing segment, vaccines segment and biopharmaceuticals segment of the Company, Chief Scientific Officer of the Company, the Vice President, Head of Corporate Business Development, the Vice President, Tax of the Company, and, solely for the purposes of Section 5.13, Alisa Harbin.

        5.2.    Capitalization of the Company and its Subsidiaries.    

A-6


        5.3.    Corporate Authority; Approval and Fairness.    

A-7


        5.4.    Consents and Approvals; No Violations.    No filing with or notice to, and no permit, authorization, registration, consent or approval of, any court or tribunal or administrative, governmental or regulatory body, agency, authority or other entity (a "Governmental Entity") is required on the part of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries for the execution, delivery and performance by the Company of this Agreement or the consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated hereby, except (i) pursuant to the applicable requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (including the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder the "Securities Act") and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (including the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder the "Exchange Act"), (ii) the filing of the Certificate of Merger pursuant to the DGCL, (iii) compliance with Section 721 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended ("Exon-Florio"), (iv) compliance with any applicable requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the "HSR Act"), (v) compliance with any applicable requirements of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the "EC Merger Regulation"), (vi) compliance with any applicable requirements of Laws in other foreign jurisdictions governing antitrust or merger control matters, (vii) as may be required by the Nasdaq National Market or (viii) where the failure to obtain such permits, authorizations, consents or approvals or to make such filings or give such notice would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect or would not prevent, impair or materially delay the consummation of the Merger and the transactions contemplated hereby. Neither the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by the Company nor the consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated hereby will (A) conflict with or result in any breach, violation or infringement of any provision of the respective certificate of incorporation or by-laws (or similar governing documents) of the Company or of any its Subsidiaries, (B) result in a breach, violation or infringement of, or constitute (with or without due notice or lapse of time or both) a default (or give rise to the creation of any Lien or any right of termination, amendment, cancellation or acceleration) under, any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any note, bond, mortgage, indenture, lease, license, contract, agreement or other instrument or obligation, whether written or oral (each a "Contract"), to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which any of them or any of their respective properties or assets may be bound that is required to be described in, or filed as an exhibit to, any Company Report (as defined below) (each, a "Material Contract"), or (C) violate or infringe any order, writ, injunction, judgment, arbitration award, agency requirement, decree, law, statute, ordinance, rule or regulation, concession, franchise, permit, license or other governmental authorization or approval (each a "Law") applicable to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective

A-8


properties or assets, except in the case of (B) or (C) for breaches, violations, infringements, defaults or changes which would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect (excluding, for purposes of this Section 5.4, clause (4) of the definition of Company Material Adverse Effect) or to prevent, impede or materially delay the ability of the Company to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby or to perform its obligations hereunder.

        5.5.    Compliance with Laws; Licenses.    The Company and its Subsidiaries operate their respective businesses in substantial compliance with any federal, state, local or foreign Laws applicable to such businesses (other than any Laws relating to the subject matters covered in Section 5.12 or 5.14), except for such violations that would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect or to prevent, impede or materially delay the ability of the Company to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby or to perform its obligations hereunder. No investigation or review by any Governmental Entity with respect to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened, nor has any Governmental Entity indicated an intention to conduct the same, except for such investigations or reviews that would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. The Company and its Subsidiaries each has all governmental permits, licenses, franchises, variances, exemptions, orders issued or granted by a Governmental Entity and all other authorizations, consents and approvals issued or granted by a Governmental Entity necessary to conduct its business as presently conducted, except those the absence of which would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.

        5.6.    No Default.    Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is in default or violation (and no event has occurred which with notice or the lapse of time or both would constitute a default or violation) of any term, condition or provision of (i) its certificate of incorporation or by-laws (or similar governing documents) or (ii) any Material Contract, except in the case of clause (ii) of this sentence for violations, breaches or defaults that would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.

        5.7.    Company Reports; Financial Statements.    

A-9


        5.8.    No Undisclosed Material Liabilities.    Except: (i) liabilities disclosed and provided for on the balance sheets (including the notes thereto) included in the Company Reports filed by the Company prior to the date hereof; (ii) liabilities or obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practices since December 31, 2004; (iii) liabilities and obligations incurred under contracts to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which any of them or any of their respective properties or assets may be bound, other than liabilities or obligations arising from a breach or default under any such contract; or (iv) liabilities or obligations that would not be reasonably expected, either individually or in the aggregate, to have a Company Material Adverse Effect, there are no liabilities or obligations of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries of any kind whatsoever, whether accrued, contingent, fixed, matured or otherwise, and whether or not required to be disclosed.

A-10


        5.9.    Litigation.    There is no civil, criminal or administrative suit, claim, hearing, inquiry, action, proceeding or investigation (each an "Action") pending to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect or to prevent, impede or materially delay the ability of the Company to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby or to perform its obligations hereunder. Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is subject to any outstanding order, writ, injunction or decree, except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect or to prevent, impede or materially delay the ability of the Company to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby or to perform its obligations hereunder.

        5.10.    Material Contracts.    To the Knowledge of the Company and its Subsidiaries, all of the Material Contracts of the Company and its Subsidiaries are in full force and effect, except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.

        5.11.    Absence of Certain Changes or Events.    Since September 30, 2005 and through the date hereof, there has not been any Company Material Adverse Effect or any event, occurrence, discovery or development which would, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have or result in a Company Material Adverse Effect or to prevent, impede or materially delay the ability of the Company to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby or to perform its obligations hereunder.

        5.12.    Employee Benefit Plans.    

A-11


        5.13.    Intellectual Property.    

A-12


        5.14.    Taxes.    Except as would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect: (i) the Company and each of its Subsidiaries have prepared in good faith and duly and timely filed (taking into account any extension of time within which to file) all Tax Returns required to be filed by any of them and all such filed Tax Returns are complete and accurate in all respects; (ii) the Company and each of its Subsidiaries have paid all Taxes that are required to be paid by any of them and the Company and all of its Subsidiaries have withheld and paid all Taxes required to have been withheld and paid in connection with any amounts paid or owing to any employee, independent contractor, stockholder, creditor or other third party; (iii) the Company and each of its Subsidiaries have not waived any statute of limitations with respect to Taxes which has not since expired or agreed to any extension of time with respect to a Tax assessment or deficiency which has not since expired; (iv) the Tax Returns referred to in clause (i) of this Section 5.14 have been examined by the IRS or the appropriate state, local or foreign taxing authority or the period for assessment of the Taxes in respect of which such Tax Returns were required to be filed has expired, and all deficiencies asserted or assessments made as a result of such examinations have been paid in full, settled, or adequately provided for, in accordance with GAAP, in the financial statements contained in the Company Reports filed on or prior to the date of this Agreement; and (v) as of the date of this Agreement, there are not pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened in writing, any audits, examinations, investigations or other proceedings in respect of Taxes or Tax matters with respect to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. For purposes of this Agreement (i) the term "Tax" (including, with correlative meaning, the term "Taxes") includes all federal, state, local and foreign income, profits, franchise, gross receipts, environmental, customs duty, capital stock, severances, stamp, payroll, sales, employment, unemployment, disability, use, property, withholding, excise, production, value added, occupancy and other taxes, duties or assessments of any nature whatsoever, together with all interest, penalties and additions imposed with respect to such amounts and any interest in respect of such penalties and additions, whether disputed or not and including any obligations to indemnify or otherwise assume or succeed to the Tax liability of any other Person and (ii) the term "Tax Return" includes all returns and reports (including elections, declarations, disclosures, schedules, estimates and information returns) required to be filed with, or supplied to, any federal, state, local or foreign tax authority with respect to Taxes.

        5.15.    Takeover Statutes; Charter Provisions.    The Company Board, upon recommendation by the Independent Directors, has approved the Merger and this Agreement, and such approval is sufficient to render inapplicable to the Merger and this Agreement the limitations on business combinations contained in any restrictive provision of any "fair price," "moratorium," "control share acquisition," "interested stockholder" or other similar anti-takeover statute or regulation (including, without limitation, Section 203 of the DGCL to the extent applicable) ("Takeover Statute") or restrictive provision of any applicable anti-takeover provision in the Company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws. No other state takeover statute or similar statute or regulation or other comparable takeover provision of the Company's certificate of incorporation or by-laws applies to the Merger, this Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

        5.16.    Opinions of Financial Advisors.    The Financial Advisors have delivered their written opinions (the "Fairness Opinions") to the Independent Directors and the Company Board to the effect that, as of the date of such opinions, the Merger Consideration to be received by the holders of shares of Common Stock (other than the Novartis Companies) pursuant to the Merger pursuant to Article IV hereof is fair from a financial point of view to such holders. It is agreed and understood that such

A-13



opinions are for the benefit of the Independent Directors and the Company Board and may not be relied on by Novartis or Merger Sub.

        5.17.    Brokers.    No broker, finder or investment banker (other than the Financial Advisors) is entitled to any brokerage, finders' or other fee or commission in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of the Company.

ARTICLE VI
Representations and Warranties
of Novartis and Merger Sub

        Novartis and Merger Sub hereby represent and warrant to the Company as follows:

        6.1.    Organization, Good Standing and Qualification.    Each of Parent, Novartis and Merger Sub is a corporation or other legal entity duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the Laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation or organization and has all requisite corporate or other business entity power and authority to own, lease and operate its properties and assets and to carry on its businesses as now being conducted and is qualified to do business and is in good standing as a foreign corporation or other business entity in each jurisdiction where the ownership, leasing or operation of its properties or assets or conduct of its business requires such qualification, except where the failure to be so qualified or in good standing or to have such power or authority, would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to prevent or materially delay or materially impair the ability of Novartis or Merger Sub to consummate the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Novartis has heretofore delivered or made available to the Company accurate and complete copies of the certificate of incorporation and by-laws (or similar governing documents), as currently in effect, of Novartis and Merger Sub.

        6.2.    Authority Relative to This Agreement.    Each of Parent, Novartis and Merger Sub has all necessary corporate power and authority, and has taken all action necessary, to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under this Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby in accordance with the terms hereof. This Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by each of Parent, Novartis and Merger Sub and, assuming due authorization, execution and delivery hereof by the Company, constitutes a valid and binding agreement of each of Parent, Novartis and Merger Sub, enforceable against each of Parent, Novartis and Merger Sub in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and similar laws of general applicability relating to affecting creditors' rights and to general equity principles.

        6.3.    Consents and Approvals; No Violations.    No filing with or notice to, and no permit, authorization, registration, consent or approval of, any Governmental Entity is required on the part of Parent, Novartis or Merger Sub or any of their Subsidiaries for the execution, delivery and performance by Parent, Novartis and Merger Sub of this Agreement or the consummation by Parent, Novartis or Merger Sub of the transactions contemplated hereby, other than (i) as set forth in Schedule 6.3, (ii) pursuant to the applicable requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, (iii) the filing of the Certificate of Merger pursuant to the DGCL, (iv) compliance with Exon-Florio, the HSR Act and the EC Merger Regulation, (v) compliance with any applicable requirements of laws, rules and regulations in other foreign jurisdictions governing antitrust or merger control matters or (vi) where the failure to obtain such permits, authorizations, consents or approvals or to make such filings or give such notice would not reasonably be expected to prevent, impair or materially delay the consummation of the Merger and the transactions contemplated hereby.

        6.4.    Merger Sub.    All of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Merger Sub is, and at the Effective Time will be, owned by Novartis or a direct or indirect wholly-owned Subsidiary of Novartis. Merger Sub has not conducted any business prior to the date hereof and has no, and prior to the Effective Time will have no, assets, liabilities or obligations of any nature other than those incident to its formation and pursuant to this Agreement and the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

        6.5.    Financing.    The Novartis Companies have, as of the date hereof, and will have, as of the Closing Date, available cash or other liquid assets to pay the aggregate Merger Consideration in full.

A-14


ARTICLE VII
Covenants

        7.1.    Interim Operations.    

A-15


A-16


        7.2.    Acquisition Proposals.    

A-17


        7.3.    Stockholder Meeting; Proxy Material; Recommendation.    

A-18


        7.4.    Commercially Reasonable Efforts; Cooperation.    

A-19


A-20


        7.5.    Access.    Subject to applicable Laws relating to the sharing of information, upon reasonable notice, the Company shall, and shall cause its Subsidiaries to, afford Novartis, and its officers, employees, counsel, accountants and other authorized Representatives, reasonable access, during normal business hours throughout the period prior to the Effective Time, to its properties, books, contracts and records and, during such period, the Company shall, and shall cause its Subsidiaries to, furnish promptly to Novartis all information concerning its business, properties and personnel as may reasonably be requested (including by taking the actions set forth on Section 7.5 of the Company Disclosure Schedule); provided, however, that no investigation pursuant to this Section 7.5 shall affect or be deemed to modify any representation or warranty made by the Company; provided, further, that the foregoing shall not require the Company to permit any inspection, or to disclose any information, that in the reasonable judgment of the Company would result in the disclosure of any trade secrets of third parties or violate any of its obligations with respect to confidentiality. At the request of Novartis, throughout the period prior to the Effective Time, the Company shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to obtain waivers from Persons who are parties to Contracts with the Company or its Subsidiaries that contain confidentiality provisions in order for Novartis to be provided reasonable access to such Contracts. All such information shall be governed by the terms of the Confidentiality Agreement referred to in Section 10.8.

        7.6.    Consents.    Subject to other provisions contained in this Agreement, Novartis, Merger Sub and the Company each will use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain consents of all third parties and Governmental Entities necessary, proper or advisable for the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby.

A-21


        7.7.    Public Announcements.    The initial press release regarding this Agreement shall be a joint press release mutually agreed upon, and thereafter Novartis and the Company will consult with one another before issuing any press release or otherwise making any public statements with respect to the transactions contemplated hereby, including the Merger, and shall not issue any such press release or make any such public statement prior to such consultation, except as may be required by applicable Law or by obligations pursuant to any listing agreement with any national securities exchange, as determined in good faith by such party.

        7.8.    Employee Benefits.    

A-22


        7.9.    Indemnification; Directors' and Officers' Insurance.    

A-23


        7.10.    Takeover Statutes.    If any Takeover Statute is or may become applicable to the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, the Company and the Company Board (or the Independent Directors or any other appropriate committee of the Company Board) shall grant all approvals and take all actions as are necessary so that such transactions may be consummated as promptly as practicable on the terms contemplated by this Agreement and otherwise act to eliminate or minimize the effects of such Takeover Statute on such transactions.

        7.11.    Retention of Shares; Voting of Shares at Stockholders Meeting.    Other than as contemplated herein, none of the Novartis Companies have any intention of disposing of, nor will any of the Novartis Companies dispose of, any shares of Common Stock owned by any of them as of the date hereof.

A-24



Novartis shall, and shall cause the other Novartis Companies, to vote all shares of Common Stock owned by each of them in favor of adopting this Agreement at the Stockholders Meeting.

ARTICLE VIII
Conditions

        8.1.    Conditions to the Obligations of the Company, Novartis and Merger Sub to Effect the Merger.    The respective obligation of each of the Company, Novartis and Merger Sub to effect the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver at or prior to the Closing of each of the following conditions:

        8.2.    Conditions to Obligations of Novartis and Merger Sub.    The obligation of Novartis and Merger Sub to effect the Merger is also subject to the satisfaction or waiver by Novartis at or prior to the Closing of the following conditions:

A-25


        8.3.    Conditions to Obligation of the Company.    The obligation of the Company to effect the Merger is also subject to the satisfaction or waiver by the Company at or prior to the Effective Time of the following conditions:

A-26



ARTICLE IX
Termination

        9.1.    Termination by Mutual Consent.    This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after the adoption by the stockholders of the Company referred to in Section 8.1(a), by mutual written consent of the Company, by action of the Company Board (approved by the Independent Directors), and Novartis, by action of its board of directors.

        9.2.    Termination by Either Novartis or the Company.    This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time by Novartis, by action of its board of directors, or by the Company, by action of the Company Board (approved by the Independent Directors), if (a) the Merger shall not have been consummated by the date that is nine months from the date hereof, provided, however, that if (x) the Effective Time has not occurred by such date by reason of nonsatisfaction of any of the conditions set forth in Sections 8.1(b), 8.1(c), 8.2(c) or 8.2(e) and (y) all other conditions in Article 8 have theretofore been satisfied or (to the extent legally permissible) waived or are then capable of being satisfied, then the Company may extend the Termination Date to a date not beyond twelve months from the date hereof (the "Termination Date"), (b) the adoption by the Company's stockholders required by Section 8.1(a) shall not have been obtained at the Stockholders Meeting (after giving effect to all adjournments or postponements thereof), or (c) any Injunction permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting consummation of the Merger shall have become final and non-appealable; provided, however, that the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 9.2(a) or Section 9.2(c) shall not be available to any party that has breached its obligations under this Agreement in any manner that shall have proximately contributed to the occurrence of the failure of the Merger to be consummated (in the case of Section 9.2(a), by the Termination Date).

        9.3.    Termination by the Company.    This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after the adoption by stockholders of the Company referred to in Section 8.1(a), by action of the Company Board (approved by the Independent Directors) if there has been a breach of any representations, warranties, covenants or agreements made by Novartis or Merger Sub in this Agreement, or any such representations, warranties, covenants or agreements shall have become untrue or incorrect after the execution of this Agreement, such that (i) the condition set forth in either Section 8.3(a) or 8.3(b) would not be satisfied and (ii) such breach or failure to be true and correct is not curable by the Termination Date.

        9.4.    Termination by Novartis.    This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time, by action of the board of directors of Novartis, if (a) the Company Board or the Independent Directors shall have withdrawn or adversely qualified or modified the Recommendation or (b) there has been a breach of any representations, warranties, covenants or agreements made by the Company in this Agreement, or any such representations, warranties, covenants or agreements shall have become untrue or incorrect after the execution of this Agreement, such that (i) the condition set forth in either Section 8.2(a) or 8.2(b) would not be satisfied and (ii) such breach or failure to be true or correct is not curable by the Termination Date.

        9.5.    Effect of Termination and Abandonment.    In the event of a termination of this Agreement and the abandonment of the Merger pursuant to this Article IX, this Agreement (other than as set forth in Section 10.1) shall become void and of no effect with no liability on the part of any party hereto (or of any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, legal and financial advisors or other representatives); provided, however, that, except as otherwise provided herein, no such termination shall relieve any party hereto of any liability or damages resulting from any willful or intentional breach of this Agreement.

A-27



ARTICLE X
Miscellaneous and General

        10.1.    Non-Survival of Representations and Warranties and Agreements.    None of the representations and warranties in this Agreement or in any instrument delivered pursuant to this Agreement shall survive the Effective Time or, except as set forth in Section 9.5 hereof, the termination of this Agreement pursuant to the terms hereof. This Section 10.1 shall not limit any covenant or agreement of the parties which by its terms contemplates performance after the Effective Time.

        10.2.    Modification or Amendment.    Subject to the provisions of applicable Law, at any time prior to the Effective Time, (i) this Agreement may be amended, modified or supplemented only in writing executed by each of the parties hereto by action of the board of directors of each such party (in the case of the Company, approved by the Independent Directors), and (ii) any provisions herein may be waived only in writing executed by the party or parties against whom such waiver is asserted by action of such party or parties' board of directors (in the case of the Company, approved by the Independent Directors).

        10.3.    Waiver of Conditions.    The conditions to each of the parties' obligations to consummate the Merger are for the sole benefit of such party and may be waived by such party in whole or in part to the extent permitted by applicable Law, in such party's sole discretion.

        10.4.    Definitions.    Each of the terms set forth in Annex A is defined in the Section of this Agreement set forth opposite such term.

        10.5.    Counterparts.    This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each such counterpart being deemed to be an original instrument, and all such counterparts shall together constitute the same agreement.

        10.6.    GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE; WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL.    

A-28


        10.7.    Notices.    Any notice, request, instruction or other document to be given hereunder by any party to the others shall be in writing and delivered personally or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, facsimile or by overnight courier:

A-29


or to such other persons or addresses as may be designated in writing by the Person to receive such notice as provided above. Any notice, request, instruction or other document given as provided above shall be deemed given to the receiving party upon actual receipt, if delivered personally; three Business Days after deposit in the mail, if sent by registered or certified mail; upon confirmation of successful transmission if sent by facsimile (provided that if given by facsimile such notice, request, instruction or other document shall be followed up within one Business Day by delivery pursuant to one of the other methods described herein); or on the next Business Day after deposit with an internationally recognized overnight courier, if sent by such a courier.

        10.8.    Entire Agreement.    This Agreement, together with the schedules, Annex A hereto, and the Confidentiality Agreement, dated as of May 26, 2005, by and between the Company and Parent, constitute the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all other prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.

        10.9.    No Third Party Beneficiaries.    Except as expressly set forth in Section 7.9 (Indemnification; Directors' and Officers' Insurance) of this Agreement, this Agreement is not intended to, and does not, confer upon any Person other than the parties who are signatories hereto any rights or remedies hereunder.

        10.10.    Severability.    The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable and the invalidity or unenforceability of any provision shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the other provisions hereof. If any provision of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any Person or any circumstance is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable the remaining provisions hereof, shall, subject to the following sentence, remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby, so long as the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner adverse to either party. Upon such determination, the parties shall negotiate in good faith in an effort to agree upon such a suitable and equitable provision to effect the original intent of the parties.

        10.11.    Interpretation; Absence of Presumption.    

        10.12.    Expenses.    The Surviving Corporation shall pay all charges and expenses, including those of the Paying Agent, in connection with the transactions contemplated in Article IV. Whether or not the Merger is consummated, all costs and expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement and the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be paid by the party incurring such expense, except that expenses incurred in connection with the filing fee for the Schedule 13E-3

A-30


and printing and mailing the Company Proxy Statement and the Schedule 13E-3 shall be shared equally by Novartis and the Company.

        10.13.    Assignment.    This Agreement shall not be assignable by any party hereto; provided, however, that Novartis may designate, by written notice to the Company, another Subsidiary of Novartis to be a constituent corporation in lieu of Merger Sub, whereupon all references herein to Merger Sub shall be deemed references to such other Subsidiary, except that all representations and warranties with respect to Merger Sub as of the date of this Agreement shall be deemed representations and warranties with respect to such other Subsidiary as of the date of such designation. Any purported assignment in violation of this Agreement will be void ab initio.

        10.14.    Parent Guarantee.    Whenever in this Agreement performance of or compliance with a covenant or obligation is expressed to be required by Novartis or Merger Sub, Parent shall cause Novartis or Merger Sub to perform or comply with such covenant or obligation, such that any failure of Novartis or Merger Sub to perform or comply with any such covenant or obligation shall be deemed to be a breach of such covenant or obligation by Parent.

A-31


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the duly authorized officers of the parties hereto as of the date first written above.

    CHIRON CORPORATION

 

 

By:

/s/  
HOWARD PIEN      
      Name: Howard Pien
      Title: Chief Executive Officer

 

 

NOVARTIS CORPORATION

 

 

By:

/s/  
MARTIN HENRICH      
      Name: Martin Henrich
      Title: Authorized Signatory

 

 

NOVARTIS BIOTECH PARTNERSHIP, INC.

 

 

By:

/s/  
MARTIN FRIEDMAN      
      Name: Martin Friedman
      Title: Authorized Signatory

 

 

NOVARTIS AG, for purposes of Section 10.14 only

 

 

By:

/s/  
FREDERIC KROHN      
      Name: Frederic Krohn
      Title: Authorized Signatory

[Chiron Merger Agreement Signature Page]

A-32


ANNEX A TO THE MERGER AGREEMENT

DEFINED TERMS

Terms

  Section
Acquisition Proposal   7.2(a)
Action   5.8
Affected Employees   7.8(a)
Agreement   Preamble
Audit Date   5.6(a)
Business Day   1.2
By-Laws   2.2
Certificate   4.1(a)
Certificate of Merger   1.3
Charter   2.1
Closing   1.2
Closing Date   1.2
Code   5.11(c)
Common Stock   Recitals
Company   Preamble
Company Board   Recitals
Company Disclosure Schedule   Article V
Company Material Adverse Effect   5.1
Company Option   4.5(a)
Company Requisite Vote   5.3(a)
Contract   5.4
D&O Insurance   7.9(b)
Debentures   5.2(a)
DGCL   1.1
Dissenting Shares   4.1(a)
Dissenting Stockholders   4.1(a)
EC Merger Regulation   5.4
Effective Time   1.3
ERISA   5.11(a)
Exchange Act   5.4
Exchange Fund   4.2(a)
Excluded Share   4.1(a)
Excluded Shares   4.1(a)
Exon-Florio   5.4
Fairness Opinions   5.15
Financial Advisors   5.3(b)
GAAP   5.6(b)
Governance Agreement   Recitals
Government Antitrust Entity   7.4(d)
Governmental Consents   8.1(b)
Governmental Entity   5.4
herein   10.11(a)
hereof   10.11(a)
herewith   10.11(a)
HSR Act   5.4
     

A-33


including   10.11(a)
including without limitation   10.11(a)
Indemnified Person   7.9(a)
Indemnified Persons   7.9(a)
Injunction   8.1(c)
Intellectual Property   5.12(a)
Knowledge of the Company   5.1
Law   5.4
Lien   5.2(a)
Maximum Annual Premium   7.9(b)
Merger   Recitals
Merger Consideration   4.1(a)
Merger Sub   Preamble
New Plans   7.8(b)
non-U.S. Benefit Plans   5.11(a)
non-U.S. Employees   5.11(a)
Novartis   Preamble
Novartis Companies   4.1(a)
Old Plan   7.8(b)
or   10.11(a)
Parent   Preamble
Paying Agent   4.2(a)
Person   4.2(d)
Preferred Stock   5.2(a)
Recommendation   7.3(b)
Representatives   7.2(a)
Restricted Common Stock   5.2(a)
SEC   5.6(a)
Securities Act   5.4
Share Right   4.5(b)
Significant Subsidiary   5.1
Stockholders Meeting   7.3(a)
Subsidiary   5.1
Superior Proposal   7.2(a)
Surviving Corporation   1.1
Takeover Statute   5.14
Tax   5.13
Tax Return   5.13
Taxes   5.13
Termination Date   9.2
Trade Secrets   5.12(a)

A-34


Annex B


Opinion of CSFB

October 30, 2005

Board of Directors
Chiron Corporation
4560 Horton Street
Emeryville, California 94608

Members of the Board:

        You have asked us to advise you with respect to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of the common stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Company Common Stock"), of Chiron Corporation (the "Company"), other than Novartis AG (the "Parent") and its affiliates, of the Merger Consideration (as defined below) to be received by such holders pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 30, 2005 (the "Merger Agreement"), among Novartis Corporation, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Parent ("Novartis"), Novartis Biotech Partnership, Inc., a subsidiary of Novartis ("Merger Sub"), the Company and, only for purposes of Section 10.14 of the Merger Agreement, Parent. The Merger Agreement provides for, among other things, the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company (the "Merger") pursuant to which the Company will be the surviving corporation and each outstanding share of Company Common Stock will be converted into the right to receive $45.00 in cash (the "Merger Consideration").

        In arriving at our opinion, we have reviewed the Merger Agreement and certain related documents as well as certain publicly available business and financial information relating to the Company. We also have reviewed certain other information relating to the Company, including financial forecasts, provided to or discussed with us by the Company, and have met with the management of the Company to discuss the business and prospects of the Company. We also have considered certain financial and stock market data of the Company, and we have compared that data with similar data for other publicly held companies in businesses we deemed similar to those of the Company and we have considered, to the extent publicly available, the financial terms of certain other business combinations and transactions which have been effected or announced. We also considered such other information, financial studies, analyses and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria which we deemed relevant.

        In connection with our review, we have not assumed any responsibility for independent verification of any of the foregoing information and have relied on such information being complete and accurate in all material respects. With respect to the financial forecasts for the Company that we have reviewed, the management of the Company has advised us, and we have assumed, that such forecasts have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the management of the Company as to the future financial performance of the Company. We have assumed, with your consent, that in the course of obtaining any necessary regulatory or third party consents, approvals or agreements for the Merger, no modification, delay, limitation, restriction or condition will be imposed that will have an adverse effect on the Company or the Merger and that the Merger will be consummated in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term, condition or agreement therein. In addition, we have not been requested to make, and have not made, an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of the Company, nor have we been furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals. Our opinion addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Company Common Stock, other than Parent and its affiliates, of the Merger Consideration to be received in the Merger and does not address any other aspect or implication of the Merger or

B-1



any other agreement, arrangement or understanding entered into in connection with the Merger or otherwise. Our opinion is necessarily based upon information made available to us as of the date hereof and financial, economic, market and other conditions as they exist and can be evaluated on the date hereof. Our opinion does not address the relative merits of the Merger as compared to other business strategies or transactions that might be available to the Company, nor does it address the underlying business decision of the Company to proceed with the Merger.

        We have acted as financial advisor to the Company in connection with the Merger and will receive a fee for our services, a significant portion of which is contingent upon the consummation of the Merger. We also will receive a fee upon rendering this opinion. In addition, the Company has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities and other items arising out of our engagement. From time to time, we and our affiliates have in the past provided, currently are providing and in the future may provide, investment banking and other financial services to the Company, Novartis and Parent unrelated to the proposed Merger, for which services we have received, and would expect to receive, compensation. We are a full service securities firm engaged in securities trading and brokerage activities as well as providing investment banking and other financial services. In the ordinary course of our business, we and our affiliates may acquire, hold or sell, for our own accounts and for the accounts of customers, equity, debt and other securities and financial instruments (including bank loans and other obligations) of the Company, Novartis, Parent and any other entities involved in the Merger and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities, as well as provide investment banking and other financial services to such companies.

        It is understood that this letter is for the information of the Board of Directors of the Company in connection with its evaluation of the Merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote or act on any matter relating to the proposed Merger.

        Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Merger Consideration to be received by the holders of Company Common Stock, other than Parent and its affiliates, in the Merger is fair to such holders, from a financial point of view.

 
   
   
Very truly yours,

CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON LLC

 

 

By:

 

/s/  
GEORGE BOUTROS      
Title: Managing Director

 

 

B-2


Annex C


Opinion of Morgan Stanley

October 30, 2005

Board of Directors
Chiron Corporation
4560 Horton Street
Emeryville, CA 94608

Members of the Board:

        We understand that Chiron Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), Novartis AG, a Swiss corporation ("Parent"), Novartis Corporation, a New York corporation and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent ("Novartis"), and Novartis Biotech Partnership, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a subsidiary of Novartis Corporation ("Merger Sub"), propose to enter into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, to be dated as of October 30, 2005, substantially in the form of the draft dated October 29, 2005 (the "Merger Agreement"). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company (the "Merger"). As a result of the Merger, the Company will become an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Novartis and each share of the Company's common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger—other than (i) shares owned by Parent or any direct or indirect Subsidiary (as defined in the Merger Agreement) of Parent (other than shares so owned on behalf of third parties), (ii) shares owned by the Company or any direct or indirect Subsidiary of the Company (other than shares so owned on behalf of third parties), and (iii) shares owned by stockholders properly exercising appraisal rights pursuant to Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the shares described in the preceding clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) being referred to as the ("Excluded Shares")—will be converted into the right to receive $45.00 in cash (the "Merger Consideration"). The terms and conditions of the Merger are more fully set forth in the Merger Agreement. We further understand that approximately 42% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock are owned by Novartis.

        You have asked for our opinion as to whether the Merger Consideration is fair from a financial point of view to the holders of Common Stock (other than the holders of Excluded Shares).

        For purposes of the opinion set forth herein, we have:

C-1


        We have assumed and relied upon without independent verification the accuracy and completeness of the information supplied or otherwise made available to us by the Company for the purposes of this opinion. With respect to the financial projections, we have assumed that they have been reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the future financial performance of the Company. In addition, we have assumed that the Merger will be consummated in accordance with the terms set forth in the Merger Agreement, without material modification, waiver or delay. We do not express any opinion as to any tax or other consequences that may result from the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, nor does our opinion address any legal, tax, regulatory or accounting matters, as to which we understand the Company has such advise as it deems necessary from qualified professionals. We have not made any independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of the Company, nor have we been furnished with any such appraisals. Our opinion is necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to us as of, the date hereof. This opinion does not address the underlying business decision of the Company to enter into the Merger or the relative merits of the Merger as compared with any other strategic alternative, whether such alternatives exist.

        In arriving at our opinion, we were not authorized to solicit, and did not solicit, interest from any party with respect to the acquisition, business combination or other extraordinary transaction, involving the Company.

        We have acted as financial advisor to the Board of Directors of the Company in connection with this transaction and will receive a fee for our services, a substantial portion of which is contingent upon the closing of the Merger. In the past, we have provided financial advisory and financing services for Novartis AG and the Company and have received fees in connection with such services. Morgan Stanley may also seek to provide such services to Novartis AG in the future and may receive fees for the rendering of these services. In the ordinary course of our trading, brokerage, investment management and financing activities, Morgan Stanley or its affiliates may at any time hold long or short positions, and may trade or otherwise effect transactions, for our own account or the accounts of customers, in debt or equity securities or senior loans of Parent, Novartis or the Company.

        It is understood that this letter is for the information of the Board of Directors of the Company and may not be used for any other purpose without our prior written consent, except that a copy of this opinion may be included in its entirety in any filing the Company is required to make with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with this transaction if such inclusion is required by applicable law. In addition, Morgan Stanley expresses no opinion or recommendation as to how the shareholders of the Company should vote at the shareholders' meeting to be held in connection with the Merger.

C-2



        Based on and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion on the date hereof that the Merger Consideration is fair from a financial point of view to the holders of Common Stock (other than holders of Excluded Shares).

 
   
   
    Very truly yours,

 

 

MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED

 

 

By:

 


Peter N. Crnkovich
Managing Director

C-3


Annex D


SECTION 262 OF THE DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW
APPRAISAL RIGHTS

        262 APPRAISAL RIGHTS.—(a) Any stockholder of a corporation of this State who holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand pursuant to subsection (d) of this section with respect to such shares, who continuously holds such shares through the effective date of the merger or consolidation, who has otherwise complied with subsection (d) of this section and who has neither voted in favor of the merger or consolidation nor consented thereto in writing pursuant to Section 228 of this title shall be entitled to an appraisal by the Court of Chancery of the fair value of the stockholder's shares of stock under the circumstances described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section. As used in this section, the word "stockholder" means a holder of record of stock in a stock corporation and also a member of record of a nonstock corporation; the words "stock" and "share" mean and include what is ordinarily meant by those words and also membership or membership interest of a member of a nonstock corporation; and the words "depository receipt" mean a receipt or other instrument issued by a depository representing an interest in one or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely of stock of a corporation, which stock is deposited with the depository.

        (b)   Appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a merger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to Section 251 (other than a merger effected pursuant to Section 251(g) of this title), Section 252, Section 254, Section 257, Section 258, Section 263 or Section 264 of this title:

        (1)   Provided, however, that no appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock, which stock, or depository receipts in respect thereof, at the record date fixed to determine the stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting of stockholders to act upon the agreement of merger or consolidation, were either (i) listed on a national securities exchange or designated as a national market system security on an inter-dealer quotation system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or (ii) held of record by more than 2,000 holders; and further provided that no appraisal rights shall be available for any shares of stock of the constituent corporation surviving a merger if the merger did not require for its approval the vote of the stockholders of the surviving corporation as provided in subsection (f) of Section 251 of this title.

        (2)   Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this subsection, appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation if the holders thereof are required by the terms of an agreement of merger or consolidation pursuant to Sections 251, 252, 254, 257, 258, 263 and 264 of this title to accept for such stock anything except:

        a.     Shares of stock of the corporation surviving or resulting from such merger or consolidation, or depository receipts in respect thereof;

        b.     Shares of stock of any other corporation, or depository receipts in respect thereof, which shares of stock (or depository receipts in respect thereof) or depository receipts at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be either listed on a national securities exchange or designated as a national market system security on an inter-dealer quotation system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. or held of record by more than 2,000 holders;

        c.     Cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a. and b. of this paragraph; or

        d.     Any combination of the shares of stock, depository receipts and cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository receipts described in the foregoing subparagraphs a., b. and c. of this paragraph.

D-1



        (3)   In the event all of the stock of a subsidiary Delaware corporation party to a merger effected under Section 253 of this title is not owned by the parent corporation immediately prior to the merger, appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of the subsidiary Delaware corporation.

        (c)   Any corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of its stock as a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation, any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the corporation. If the certificate of incorporation contains such a provision, the procedures of this section, including those set forth in subsections (d) and (e) of this section, shall apply as nearly as is practicable.

        (d)   Appraisal rights shall be perfected as follows:

        (1)   If a proposed merger or consolidation for which appraisal rights are provided under this section is to be submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, the corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting, shall notify each of its stockholders who was such on the record date for such meeting with respect to shares for which appraisal rights are available pursuant to subsection (b) or (c) hereof that appraisal rights are available for any or all of the shares of the constituent corporations, and shall include in such notice a copy of this section. Each stockholder electing to demand the appraisal of such stockholder's shares shall deliver to the corporation, before the taking of the vote on the merger or consolidation, a written demand for appraisal of such stockholder's shares. Such demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends thereby to demand the appraisal of such stockholder's shares. A proxy or vote against the merger or consolidation shall not constitute such a demand. A stockholder electing to take such action must do so by a separate written demand as herein provided. Within 10 days after the effective date of such merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation shall notify each stockholder of each constituent corporation who has complied with this subsection and has not voted in favor of or consented to the merger or consolidation of the date that the merger or consolidation has become effective; or

        (2)   If the merger or consolidation was approved pursuant to Section 228 or Section 253 of this title, then, either a constituent corporation before the effective date of the merger or consolidation, or the surviving or resulting corporation within 10 days thereafter, shall notify each of the holders of any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation who are entitled to appraisal rights of the approval of the merger or consolidation and that appraisal rights are available for any or all shares of such class or series of stock of such constituent corporation, and shall include in such notice a copy of this section. Such notice may, and, if given on or after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, shall, also notify such stockholders of the effective date of the merger or consolidation. Any stockholder entitled to appraisal rights may, within 20 days after the date of mailing of such notice, demand in writing from the surviving or resulting corporation the appraisal of such holder's shares. Such demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs the corporation of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends thereby to demand the appraisal of such holder's shares. If such notice did not notify stockholders of the effective date of the merger or consolidation, either (i) each such constituent corporation shall send a second notice before the effective date of the merger or consolidation notifying each of the holders of any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation that are entitled to appraisal rights of the effective date of the merger or consolidation or (ii) the surviving or resulting corporation shall send such a second notice to all such holders on or within 10 days after such effective date; provided, however, that if such second notice is sent more than 20 days following the sending of the first notice, such second notice need only be sent to each stockholder who is entitled to appraisal rights and who has demanded appraisal of such holder's shares in accordance with this subsection. An affidavit of the secretary or assistant secretary or of the transfer agent of the corporation that is required to give either notice that such notice has been given shall, in the absence of fraud, be prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein. For purposes of determining

D-2



the stockholders entitled to receive either notice, each constituent corporation may fix, in advance, a record date that shall be not more than 10 days prior to the date the notice is given, provided, that if the notice is given on or after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, the record date shall be such effective date. If no record date is fixed and the notice is given prior to the effective date, the record date shall be the close of business on the day next preceding the day on which the notice is given.

        (e)   Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation or any stockholder who has complied with subsections (a) and (d) hereof and who is otherwise entitled to appraisal rights, may file a petition in the Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any stockholder shall have the right to withdraw such stockholder's demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the merger or consolidation. Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the requirements of subsections (a) and (d) hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to receive from the corporation surviving the merger or resulting from the consolidation a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the merger or consolidation and with respect to which demands for appraisal have been received and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. Such written statement shall be mailed to the stockholder within 10 days after such stockholder's written request for such a statement is received by the surviving or resulting corporation or within 10 days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal under subsection (d) hereof, whichever is later.

        (f)    Upon the filing of any such petition by a stockholder, service of a copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or resulting corporation, which shall within 20 days after such service file in the office of the Register in Chancery in which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving or resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in Chancery, if so ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the time and place fixed for the hearing of such petition by registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the addresses therein stated. Such notice shall also be given by one or more publications at least one week before the day of the hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Wilmington, Delaware or such publication as the Court deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by publication shall be approved by the Court, and the costs thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting corporation.

        (g)   At the hearing on such petition, the Court shall determine the stockholders who have complied with this section and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Court may require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such stockholder.

        (h)   After determining the stockholders entitled to an appraisal, the Court shall appraise the shares, determining their fair value exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger or consolidation, together with a fair rate of interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value, the Court shall take into account all relevant factors. In determining the fair rate of interest, the Court may consider all relevant factors, including the rate of interest which the surviving or resulting corporation would have had to pay to borrow money during the pendency of the proceeding. Upon application by the surviving or resulting corporation or by any stockholder entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the

D-3



Court may, in its discretion, permit discovery or other pretrial proceedings and may proceed to trial upon the appraisal prior to the final determination of the stockholder entitled to an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name appears on the list filed by the surviving or resulting corporation pursuant to subsection (f) of this section and who has submitted such stockholder's certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery, if such is required, may participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally determined that such stockholder is not entitled to appraisal rights under this section.

        (i)    The Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of the shares, together with interest, if any, by the surviving or resulting corporation to the stockholders entitled thereto. Interest may be simple or compound, as the Court may direct. Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case of holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and in the case of holders of shares represented by certificates upon the surrender to the corporation of the certificates representing such stock. The Court's decree may be enforced as other decrees in the Court of Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving or resulting corporation be a corporation of this State or of any state.

        (j)    The costs of the proceeding may be determined by the Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Court may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal.

        (k)   From and after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights as provided in subsection (d) of this section shall be entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of record at a date which is prior to the effective date of the merger or consolidation); provided, however, that if no petition for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in subsection (e) of this section, or if such stockholder shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a written withdrawal of such stockholder's demand for an appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or consolidation, either within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation as provided in subsection (e) of this section or thereafter with the written approval of the corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the Court of Chancery shall be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval of the Court, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just.

        (l)    The shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to which the shares of such objecting stockholders would have been converted had they assented to the merger or consolidation shall have the status of authorized and unissued shares of the surviving or resulting corporation.

D-4


CHIRON CORPORATION PROXY

SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS,

    •    , 2006

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF CHIRON CORPORATION

The undersigned stockholder of CHIRON CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, hereby acknowledges receipt of the Proxy Statement and the Notice of the Special Meeting of Stockholders of Chiron to be held in    •    , on    •    ,    •    , 2006, at    •    , Pacific Time, and hereby further revokes all previous proxies and appoints    •    and    •    and each of them acting individually, as proxy of the undersigned, with full power of substitution for and in the name of the undersigned, at the special meeting and any adjournments thereof with the same effect as if the undersigned were present.

The board of directors recommends a vote FOR proposal 1 below. This Proxy, when properly executed, will be voted as specified below. If no specification is made, this Proxy will be voted IN FAVOR OF each of the proposals.

1.   FOR
o
  AGAINST
o
  ABSTAIN
o
  To adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 30, 2005, among Chiron Corporation, Novartis Corporation, Novartis Biotech Partnership, Inc, and Novartis AG.

2.

 

FOR
o

 

AGAINST
o

 

ABSTAIN
o

 

In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon any other business that may properly come before the meeting, including any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.

3.

 

FOR
o

 

AGAINST
o

 

ABSTAIN
o

 

To approve postponements or adjournments of the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies.

Sign exactly as your name appears on your stock certificate. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title. If more than one trustee, all should sign. All joint owners should sign. If a corporation, sign in full corporation name by president or other authorized officer. If a partnership, sign in partnership name by authorized person. Persons signing in a fiduciary capacity should indicate their full title in such capacity.

Please sign your name:       Date:    
   
(Authorized Signature(s))
     

* Detach here from proxy voting card *

Vote by Internet or Telephone or Mail
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week

Internet and telephone voting is available through 11:00 p.m. Eastern Time
the business day prior to special meeting day.

Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your
shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.

Internet
[web address]
      Telephone
[1-800-•]
      Mail

Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website. You will be prompted to enter your control number, located in the box below, to create and submit an electronic ballot.

 

OR

 

Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you call. You will be prompted to enter your control number, located in the box below, and then follow the directions given.

 

OR

 

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone,
you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.




QuickLinks

SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS To be held on , 2006
SUMMARY TERM SHEET
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
THE PARTIES TO THE TRANSACTION
THE SPECIAL MEETING
SPECIAL FACTORS
APPRAISAL RIGHTS
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
STOCK OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Comparative Per Share Data
MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS
OTHER MATTERS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE IX Termination
Opinion of CSFB
Opinion of Morgan Stanley
SECTION 262 OF THE DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW APPRAISAL RIGHTS