UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to _________________________.

Commission file number: 0-16084

 

CITIZENS & NORTHERN CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

PENNSYLVANIA 23-2451943
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

 

90-92 MAIN STREET, WELLSBORO, PA 16901

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

570-724-3411

(Registrant's telephone number including area code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class Name of Exchange Where Registered
Common Stock Par Value $1.00 The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

 

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer “and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

(Check one:) Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No x

 

The aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock held by non-affiliates at June 30, 2013, the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $232,640,563.

 

The number of shares of common stock outstanding at February 13, 2014 was 12,409,748.

 

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s proxy statement for the annual meeting of its shareholders to be held April 17, 2014 are incorporated by reference into Parts III and IV of this report.

 

 
 

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

 

Citizens & Northern Corporation (“Corporation”) is a holding company whose principal activity is community banking. The Corporation’s principal office is located in Wellsboro, Pennsylvania. The largest subsidiary is Citizens & Northern Bank (“C&N Bank” or the “Bank”). The Corporation’s other wholly-owned subsidiaries are Citizens & Northern Investment Corporation and Bucktail Life Insurance Company (“Bucktail”). Citizens & Northern Investment Corporation was formed in 1999 to engage in investment activities. Bucktail reinsures credit and mortgage life and accident and health insurance on behalf of C&N Bank.

 

C&N Bank is a Pennsylvania banking institution that was formed by the consolidation of Northern National Bank of Wellsboro and Citizens National Bank of Towanda on October 1, 1971. Subsequent mergers included: First National Bank of Ralston in May 1972; Sullivan County National Bank in October 1977; Farmers National Bank of Athens in January 1984; and First National Bank of East Smithfield in May 1990. In 2005, the Corporation acquired Canisteo Valley Corporation and its subsidiary, First State Bank, a New York State chartered commercial bank with offices in Canisteo and South Hornell, NY. In 2010, the First State Bank operations were merged into C&N Bank and Canisteo Valley Corporation was merged into the Corporation. On May 1, 2007, the Corporation acquired Citizens Bancorp, Inc. (“Citizens”), with banking offices in Coudersport, Emporium and Port Allegany, Pennsylvania. Citizens Trust Company, the banking subsidiary of Citizens, was merged with and into C&N Bank as part of the transaction. C&N Bank has held its current name since May 6, 1975, at which time C&N Bank changed its charter from a national bank to a Pennsylvania bank.

 

C&N Bank provides an extensive range of banking services, including deposit and loan products for personal and commercial customers. The Bank also maintains a trust division that provides a wide range of financial services, such as 401(k) plans, retirement planning, estate planning, estate settlements and asset management. In January 2000, C&N Bank formed a subsidiary, C&N Financial Services Corporation (“C&NFSC”). C&NFSC is a licensed insurance agency that provides insurance products to individuals and businesses. In 2001, C&NFSC added a broker-dealer division, which offers mutual funds, annuities, educational savings accounts and other investment products through registered agents. C&NFSC’s operations are not significant in relation to the total operations of the Corporation.

 

All phases of the Bank’s business are competitive. The Bank primarily competes in Tioga, Bradford, Sullivan, Lycoming, Potter, Cameron and McKean counties in Pennsylvania, and Steuben and Allegany counties in New York. The Bank competes with local commercial banks headquartered in our market area as well as other commercial banks with branches in our market area. Some of the banks that have branches in our market area are larger in overall size. With respect to lending activities and attracting deposits, the Bank also competes with savings banks, savings and loan associations, insurance companies, regulated small loan companies and credit unions. Also, the Bank competes with mutual funds for deposits. C&N Bank competes with insurance companies, investment counseling firms, mutual funds and other business firms and individuals for trust, investment management, brokerage and insurance services. The Bank is generally competitive with all financial institutions in our service area with respect to interest rates paid on time and savings deposits, service charges on deposit accounts and interest rates charged on loans. The Bank serves a diverse customer base, and is not economically dependent on any small group of customers or on any individual industry.

 

Major initiatives within the last 5 years included the following:

 

·in 2009, raised capital of $26.440 million by issuing preferred stock and a warrant to sell 194,794 shares of common stock to the U.S. Department of the Treasury under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) Capital Purchase Program;

 

·in 2009, issued common stock, which raised a total of $24.585 million of capital, net of offering costs;

 

·in 2009, began originating and selling residential mortgage loans to the secondary market through the MPF Xtra program administered by the Federal Home Loan Banks of Pittsburgh and Chicago, with significant growth in volume of activity under this program as evidenced by net gains from sales of loans of $2,191,000 in 2013, $1,925,000 in 2012 and $1,107,000 in 2011 and a total outstanding balance of residential mortgages sold and serviced of $145,954,000 at December 31, 2013;

 

·repurchased in 2010 all of the preferred stock and redeemed the warrant from the TARP Capital Purchase Program;

 

·merged the operations of First State Bank into C&N Bank and Canisteo Valley Corporation into Citizens & Northern Corporation in 2010;

 

2
 

 

·in 2011, sold the banking facility at 130 Court Street, Williamsport, PA, and entered into a leasing arrangement to continue to offer banking and trust services from the facility, resulting in an estimated $122,000 (pre-tax) reduction in operating expenses in 2012;

 

·in April 2012, re-opened the Athens, PA, facility, which was damaged by flooding in September 2011; and

 

·in 2013, worked with consultants on projects which resulted in increases in revenues from service charges on deposit accounts, starting primarily in the fourth quarter 2013, and reductions in electronic funds processing expenses and other benefits over approximately the next five years.

 

Virtually all of the Corporation’s banking offices are located in the “Marcellus Shale,” an area extending across portions of New York State, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Maryland, West Virginia and Virginia. In recent years, most of the Pennsylvania counties in which the Corporation operates have been significantly affected by an upsurge in natural gas exploration, as technological developments have made exploration of the Marcellus Shale commercially feasible. From 2009 through approximately the first half of 2012, a significant portion of the Corporation’s new business opportunities in lending, Trust and other services arose either directly or indirectly from Marcellus Shale-related activity. Due in large part to a decline in the market price of natural gas, Marcellus Shale natural gas exploration activity slowed over the course of 2012 and further slowed in 2013, though it has not completely stalled. Due to its pervasive nature, it is virtually impossible to quantify the aggregate impact of Marcellus Shale-related activity on the Corporation’s financial position at December 31, 2013 and results of operations in 2009 through 2013.

 

At December 31, 2013, C&N Bank had total assets of $1,224,369,000, total deposits of $956,981,000, net loans outstanding of $635,640,000 and 287 full-time equivalent employees.

 

Most activities of the Corporation and its subsidiaries are regulated by federal or state agencies. The primary regulatory relationships are described as follows:

 

·The Corporation is a bank holding company formed under the provisions of Section 3 of the Federal Reserve Act. The Corporation is under the direct supervision of the Federal Reserve and must comply with the reporting requirements of the Federal Bank Holding Company Act.

 

·C&N Bank is a state-chartered, nonmember bank, supervised by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking.

 

·C&NFSC is a Pennsylvania corporation. The Pennsylvania Department of Insurance regulates C&NFSC’s insurance activities. Brokerage products are offered through third party networking agreements.

 

·Bucktail is incorporated in the state of Arizona and supervised by the Arizona Department of Insurance.

 

A copy of the Corporation’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current events reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports, will be furnished without charge upon written request to the Corporation’s Treasurer at P.O. Box 58, Wellsboro, PA 16901. Copies of these reports will be furnished as soon as reasonably possible, after they are filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information is also available through the Corporation’s web site at www.cnbankpa.com.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

The Corporation is subject to the many risks and uncertainties applicable to all banking companies, as well as risks specific to the Corporation’s geographic locations. Although the Corporation seeks to effectively manage risks, and maintains a level of equity that exceeds the banking regulatory agencies’ thresholds for being considered “well capitalized” (see Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements), management cannot predict the future and cannot eliminate the possibility of credit, operational or other losses. Accordingly, actual results may differ materially from management's expectations. Some of the Corporation’s significant risks and uncertainties are discussed below.

 

3
 

 

Credit Risk from Lending Activities - A significant source of risk is the possibility that losses will be sustained because borrowers, guarantors and related parties may fail to perform in accordance with the terms of their loan agreements. Most of the Corporation’s loans are secured, but some loans are unsecured. With respect to secured loans, the collateral securing the repayment of these loans may be insufficient to cover the obligations owed under such loans. Collateral values may be adversely affected by changes in economic, environmental and other conditions, including declines in the value of real estate, changes in interest rates, changes in monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government, wide-spread disease, terrorist activity, environmental contamination and other external events. In addition, collateral appraisals that are out of date or that do not meet industry recognized standards may create the impression that a loan is adequately collateralized when it is not. The Corporation has adopted underwriting and credit monitoring procedures and policies, including regular reviews of appraisals and borrower financial statements, that management believes are appropriate to mitigate the risk of loss. Also, as discussed further in the “Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis, the Corporation attempts to estimate the amount of losses that may be inherent in the portfolio through a quarterly evaluation process that includes several members of management and that addresses specifically identified problem loans, as well as other quantitative data and qualitative factors. Such risk management and accounting policies and procedures, however, may not prevent unexpected losses that could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

 

Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Act – In 2012, the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Act (the “Act”) became law. The Act was designed to strengthen the National Flood Insurance Program by phasing out the federal government’s subsidization of portions of the cost of flood insurance policies. Recent changes resulting from the Act have included: (1) phase-in of increased flood insurance rates for some properties, generally with an increase of 25% per year for 4 years until full-risk rates are reached, and (2) elimination of grandfathering of original flood-risk ratings, so that effective in 2014, all buildings will be rated using the latest flood zone maps. For primary residences that have never flooded and whose insurance policy has never lapsed, the government-funded subsidy will continue; however, the full-risk rate will apply immediately if a flood insurance policy lapses or if a property located in a flood zone is newly purchased.

 

Unless the Act is revised or repealed, reductions in collateral values associated with properties located in flood zones that secure some of the Corporation’s residential and commercial loans could occur, and some borrowers may become unable or unwilling to make their loan payments as a result of the increased costs of flood insurance. These potential results of the Act’s provisions could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

 

Interest Rate Risk - Business risk arising from changes in interest rates is an inherent factor in operating a banking organization. The Corporation’s assets are predominantly long-term, fixed-rate loans and debt securities. Funding for these assets comes principally from shorter-term deposits and borrowed funds. Accordingly, there is an inherent risk of lower future earnings or decline in fair value of the Corporation’s financial instruments when interest rates change. Significant fluctuations in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. For additional information regarding interest rate risk, see Part II, Item 7A, "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk."

 

Breach of Information Security and Technology Dependence - The Corporation relies on software, communication, and information exchange on a variety of computing platforms and networks and over the Internet. Despite numerous safeguards, the Corporation cannot be certain that all of its systems are entirely free from vulnerability to attack or other technological difficulties or failures. The Corporation relies on the services of a variety of vendors to meet its data processing and communication needs. If information security is breached or other technology difficulties or failures occur, information may be lost or misappropriated, services and operations may be interrupted and the Corporation could be exposed to claims from customers. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

 

Limited Geographic Diversification - The Corporation grants commercial, residential and personal loans to customers primarily in the Pennsylvania counties of Tioga, Bradford, Sullivan, Lycoming, Potter, Cameron and McKean, and in Steuben and Allegany Counties in New York State. Although the Corporation has a diversified loan portfolio, a significant portion of its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts is dependent on the local economic conditions within the region. As described in the “Business” section of Form 10-K, in recent years the Corporation’s market area has been significantly impacted by natural gas development activities associated with exploration of the Marcellus Shale. While Marcellus Shale-related development has created economic opportunities for business and individuals throughout much of our market area, natural gas exploration activity slowed in 2012 and further slowed in 2013, and the possibility exists that this activity could be further reduced or cease as a result of changes in economic conditions, environmental concerns or other factors.

 

Deterioration in economic conditions, including possible effects if Marcellus Shale-related activity were to further diminish or cease, could adversely affect the quality of the Corporation's loan portfolio and the demand for its products and services, and accordingly, could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

 

4
 

 

Competition - All phases of the Corporation’s business are competitive. Some competitors are much larger in total assets and capitalization than the Corporation, have greater access to capital markets and can offer a broader array of financial services. There can be no assurance that the Corporation will be able to compete effectively in its markets. Furthermore, developments increasing the nature or level of competition could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

 

Government Regulation and Monetary Policy - The Corporation and the banking industry are subject to extensive regulation and supervision under federal and state laws and regulations. The requirements and limitations imposed by such laws and regulations limit the manner in which the Corporation conducts its business, undertakes new investments and activities and obtains financing. These regulations are designed primarily for the protection of the deposit insurance funds and consumers and not to benefit the Corporation's shareholders. Financial institution regulation has been the subject of significant legislation in recent years and may be the subject of further significant legislation in the future, none of which is in the control of the Corporation. Significant new laws or changes in, or repeals of, existing laws could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Further, federal monetary policy, particularly as implemented through the Federal Reserve System, significantly affects short-term interest rates and credit conditions, and any unfavorable change in these conditions could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

 

Mortgage Banking – In September 2009, the Corporation entered into an agreement to originate and sell residential mortgage loans to the secondary market through the MPF Xtra program administered by the Federal Home Loan Banks of Pittsburgh and Chicago. The Corporation’s mortgage sales activity under this program was not significant in 2009, but has subsequently increased. At December 31, 2013, total residential mortgages sold and serviced amounted to $145,954,000. The Corporation must strictly adhere to the MPF Xtra program guidelines for origination, underwriting and servicing loans, and failure to do so may result in the Corporation being forced to repurchase loans or being dropped from the program. As of December 31, 2013, the total outstanding balance of residential mortgage loans the Corporation has repurchased as a result of identified instances of noncompliance amounted to $1,420,000. If the volume of such forced repurchases of loans were to increase significantly, or if the Corporation were to be dropped from the program, it could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

 

Equity Securities Risk - The Corporation’s equity securities portfolio consists of investments in stocks of banks and bank holding companies. Investments in bank stocks are subject to the risk factors affecting the banking industry, and that could cause a general market decline in the value of bank stocks. Also, losses could occur in individual stocks held by the Corporation because of specific circumstances related to each bank. These factors could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. For additional information regarding equity securities risk, see Part II, Item 7A, "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk."

 

Debt Securities Risk – In 2009, the Corporation’s earnings were materially impaired by securities losses. Much of the Corporation’s 2009 losses from trust-preferred securities and other securities stem from the much-publicized economic problems affecting the national and international economy, which particularly hurt the banking industry. The Corporation has exposure to the possibility of future losses from investments in obligations of states and political subdivisions (also known as municipal bonds) and other debt securities. For additional information regarding debt securities, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.

 

The Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh - Through its subsidiary (C&N Bank), the Corporation is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB-Pittsburgh), which is one of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The Corporation has a line of credit with the FHLB-Pittsburgh that is secured by a blanket lien on its loan portfolio. Access to this line of credit is critical if a funding need arises. However, there can be no assurance that the FHLB-Pittsburgh will be able to provide funding when needed, nor can there be assurance that the FHLB-Pittsburgh will provide funds specifically to the Corporation should its financial condition deteriorate and/or regulators prevent that access. The inability to access this source of funds could have a materially adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial flexibility if alternate financing is not available at acceptable interest rates. The failure of the FHLB-Pittsburgh or the FHLB system in general, may materially impair the Corporation’s ability to meet short- and long-term liquidity needs or to meet growth plans.

 

The Corporation owns common stock of the FHLB-Pittsburgh in order to qualify for membership in the FHLB system and access services from the FHLB-Pittsburgh. The FHLB-Pittsburgh faces a variety of risks in its operations including interest rate risk, counterparty credit risk, and adverse changes in its regulatory framework. In addition, the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks are jointly liable for the consolidated obligations of the FHLB system. To the extent that one FHLB cannot meet its obligations, other FHLBs can be called upon to make required payments. Such risks affecting the FHLB-Pittsburgh could adversely impact the value of the Corporation’s investment in the common stock of the FHLB-Pittsburgh and/or affect its access to credit.

 

5
 

 

Soundness of Other Financial Institutions - In addition to the FHLB-Pittsburgh, the Corporation maintains other credit facilities that provide it with additional liquidity. These facilities include secured and unsecured borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank and third-party commercial banks. The Corporation believes that it maintains a strong liquidity position and that it is well positioned to withstand foreseeable market conditions. However, legal agreements with counterparties typically include provisions allowing them to restrict or terminate the Corporation’s access to these credit facilities with or without advance notice and at their sole discretion.


Financial institutions are interconnected as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, and other relationships. Financial market conditions have been negatively impacted in the past and such disruptions or adverse changes in the Corporation's results of operations or financial condition could, in the future, have a negative impact on available sources of liquidity. Such a situation may arise due to circumstances that are outside the Corporation’s control, such as general market disruptions or operational problems affecting the Corporation or third parties. The Corporation’s efforts to monitor and manage liquidity risk may not be successful or sufficient to deal with dramatic or unanticipated reductions in available liquidity. In such events, the Corporation’s cost of funds may increase, thereby reducing net interest income, or the Corporation may need to sell a portion of its securities and/or loan portfolio, which, depending upon market conditions, could necessitate realizing a loss.

 

FDIC Insurance Assessments - In 2008 and 2009, higher levels of bank failures dramatically increased the resolution costs of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or the FDIC, and depleted the deposit insurance fund. In addition, the FDIC and the U.S. Congress have taken action to increase federal deposit insurance coverage, placing additional stress on the deposit insurance fund. In order to maintain a strong funding position and restore reserve ratios of the deposit insurance fund, in 2009 the FDIC increased assessment rates and imposed a special assessment on all insured institutions. In December 2009, we paid a pre-payment of the FDIC’s estimated assessment total for the next three years, totaling approximately $5.5 million. The pre-payment amount was included in Other Assets in the consolidated balance sheet, with amounts amortized in 2010 through the first six months of 2013 based on current assessments. In June 2013, as the FDIC’s funding position was strengthened in comparison to its position in 2009, the FDIC refunded the unamortized portions of the pre-payments from banks, including a refund of $2.7 million to the Corporation.


Although our total expenses from FDIC assessments have steadily decreased - to $604,000 in 2013, $633,000 in 2012, $832,000 in 2011 and $1,450,000 in 2010 - from $2,092,000 in 2009, we are generally unable to control the amount of premiums that we are required to pay for FDIC insurance. If a significant number of bank or financial institution failures occur, we may be required to pay higher FDIC premiums. Future increases in FDIC insurance premiums or additional special assessments may materially adversely affect our results of operations.

 

Bank Secrecy Act and Related Laws and Regulations - These laws and regulations have significant implications for all financial institutions. They increase due diligence requirements and reporting obligations for financial institutions, create new crimes and penalties, and require the federal banking agencies, in reviewing merger and other acquisition transactions, to consider the effectiveness of the parties to such transactions in combating money laundering activities. Even innocent noncompliance and inconsequential failure to follow the regulations could result in significant fines or other penalties, which could have a material adverse impact on the Corporation's financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

 

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

 

The Bank owns each of its properties, except for the branch facilities located at 130 Court Street, Williamsport, PA, and at 2 East Mountain Avenue, South Williamsport, PA, which are leased. In September 2011, the Athens, PA office was damaged by flooding and reopened in April 2012. The Bank did not incur a significant financial loss associated with the flooding, as almost all of the cost of replacement was covered by insurance. All of the other properties are in good condition. None of the owned properties are subject to encumbrance.

 

A listing of properties is as follows:

 

Main administrative offices: 

90-92 Main Street or 10 Nichols Street
Wellsboro, PA  16901 Wellsboro, PA  16901

  

6
 

 

Branch offices – Citizens & Northern Bank:

 

  428 S. Main Street   514 Main Street   2 East Mountain Avenue **
  Athens, PA  18810   Laporte, PA  18626   South Williamsport, PA  17702
           
  10 North Main Street   4534 Williamson Trail   41 Main Street
  Coudersport, PA  16915   Liberty, PA  16930   Tioga, PA  16946
           
  111 W. Main Street   1085 S. Main Street   428 Main Street
  Dushore, PA  18614   Mansfield, PA  16933   Towanda, PA  18848
           
  563 Main Street   612 James Monroe Avenue   64 Elmira Street
  East Smithfield, PA  18817   Monroeton, PA  18832   Troy, PA  16947
           
  104 W. Main Street   3461 Route 405 Highway   90-92 Main Street
  Elkland, PA  16920   Muncy, PA  17756   Wellsboro, PA  16901
           
  135 East Fourth Street   100 Maple Street   1510 Dewey Avenue
  Emporium, PA  15834   Port Allegany, PA  16743   Williamsport, PA  17701
           
  230 Railroad Street   24 Thompson Street   130 Court Street **
  Jersey Shore, PA  17740   Ralston, PA  17763   Williamsport, PA  17701
           
  102 E. Main Street   1827 Elmira Street   1467 Golden Mile Road
  Knoxville, PA  16928   Sayre, PA  18840   Wysox, PA  18854
           
  3 Main Street   6250 County Rte 64    
  Canisteo, NY  14823   Hornell, NY  14843    

 

Facilities management office:

   13 Water Street

   Wellsboro, PA 16901

 

**  designates leased branch facility

 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

The Corporation and the Bank are involved in various legal proceedings incidental to their business. Management believes the aggregate liability, if any, resulting from such pending and threatened legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

QUARTERLY SHARE DATA

Trades of the Corporation’s stock are executed through various brokers who maintain a market in the Corporation’s stock. The Corporation’s stock is listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market with the trading symbol CZNC. As of December 31, 2013, there were 2,465 shareholders of record of the Corporation’s common stock.

 

7
 

 

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock during 2013 and 2012.

 

      2013       2012  
        Dividend       Dividend
        Declared       Declared
        per       per
    High Low Quarter   High Low Quarter
First quarter $20.00 $18.65 $0.25   $22.48 $18.12 $0.18
Second quarter 20.46 18.51 0.25   20.69 16.79 0.20
Third quarter 21.45 19.08 0.25   20.80 17.78 0.22
Fourth quarter 21.00 19.37 0.25   20.25 17.51 0.24

 

Future dividend payments will depend upon maintenance of a strong financial condition, future earnings and capital and regulatory requirements. Also, the Corporation and C&N Bank are subject to restrictions on the amount of dividends that may be paid without approval of banking regulatory authorities. These restrictions are described in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements.

 

On May 19, 2011, the Corporation authorized a plan for repurchases of outstanding common stock, up to a total of $1 million. On September 22, 2011, the Corporation’s Board of Directors authorized additional repurchases of outstanding common stock in open market or privately negotiated transactions, up to a total of $1 million, as an addition to the May 2011 stock repurchase program. The Board of Directors’ authorizations provide that: (1) the treasury stock repurchase programs became effective when publicly announced and shall continue thereafter until suspended or terminated by the Board of Directors, in its sole discretion; and (2) all shares of common stock repurchased pursuant to the programs shall be held as treasury shares and be available for use and reissuance for purposes as and when determined by the Board of Directors including, without limitation, pursuant to the Corporation’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan and its equity compensation program. As of December 31, 2013, the maximum additional value available for purchases under this program was $980,694.

 

In the fourth quarter 2013, the Corporation made no purchases of its equity securities.

 

8
 

 

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

 

Set forth below is a chart comparing the Corporation’s cumulative return to stockholders against the cumulative return of the Russell 2000 and a Peer Group Index of similar banking organizations selected by the Corporation for the five-year period commencing December 31, 2008 and ended December 31, 2013. The index values are market-weighted dividend-reinvestment numbers, which measure the total return for investing $100.00 five years ago. This meets Securities & Exchange Commission requirements for showing dividend reinvestment share performance over a five-year period and measures the return to an investor for placing $100.00 into a group of bank stocks and reinvesting any and all dividends into the purchase of more of the same stock for which dividends were paid.

 

 

    Period Ending  
Index 12/31/08 12/31/09 12/31/10 12/31/11 12/31/12 12/31/13
Citizens & Northern Corporation 100.00 50.34 80.96 104.19 111.31 127.65
Russell 2000 100.00 127.17 161.32 154.59 179.86 249.69
CZNC Peer Group Index* 100.00 97.12 110.34 106.20 123.81 154.01

The Corporation’s peer group consists of banks headquartered in Pennsylvania with total assets of $700 million to $2 billion as of September 30, 2013. This peer group consists of ACNB Corporation, Gettysburg; AmeriServ Financial, Inc., Johnstown; Citizens Financial Services, Inc., Mansfield; CNB Financial Corporation, Clearfield; Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc., York; ENB Financial Corp., Ephrata; ESB Financial Corporation, Ellwood; ESSA Bancorp, Inc., Stroudsburg; First Keystone Corporation, Berwick; First National Community Bancorp, Inc., Dunmore; FNB Bancorp, Inc., Newtown; Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc., Hatboro; Franklin Financial Services Corporation, Chambersburg; Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation, Harleysville; Integrity Bancshares, Inc., Camp Hill; Norwood Financial Corp., Honesdale; Orrstown Financial Services, Inc., Shippensburg; Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc., Williamsport; Peoples Financial Services Corp., Scranton; QNB Corp., Quakertown; Republic First Bancorp, Inc., Philadelphia; Royal Bancshares of Pennsylvania, Inc., Narberth; Somerset Trust Holding Company, Somerset; TF Financial Corporation, Newtown.

 

9
 

 

The data for this graph was obtained from SNL Financial LC, Charlottesville, VA.

 

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

 

The following table sets forth information concerning the Stock Incentive Plan and Independent Directors Stock Incentive Plan, both of which have been approved by the Corporation’s shareholders. The figures shown in the table below are as of December 31, 2013.

 

      Number of
  Number of Weighted- Securities
  Securities to be average Remaining
  Issued Upon Exercise for Future
  Exercise of Price of Issuance Under
  Outstanding Outstanding Equity Compen-
  Options Options sation Plans
Equity compensation plans      
  approved by shareholders             358,176 $19.03                334,810
       
Equity compensation plans      
  not approved by shareholders 0 N/A 0

  

More details related to the Corporation’s equity compensation plans are provided in Notes 1 and 13 to the consolidated financial statements.

 

10
 

 

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

                 
  As of or for the Year Ended December 31,
INCOME STATEMENT (In Thousands) 2013   2012   2011   2010   2009
Interest and fee income $48,914   $56,632   $61,256   $62,114   $67,976
Interest expense 5,765   9,031   13,556   19,245   24,456
Net interest income 43,149   47,601   47,700   42,869   43,520
Provision (credit) for loan losses 2,047   288   (285)   1,191   680
Net interest income after provision (credit) for loan losses 41,102   47,313   47,985   41,678   42,840
Noninterest income excluding securities gains (losses) 16,451   16,383   13,897   13,809   12,711
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings from                  
  available-for-sale securities (25)   (67)   0   (433)   (85,363)
Net realized gains on available-for-sale securities 1,743   2,749   2,216   1,262   1,523
Loss on prepayment of debt 1,023   2,333   0   0   0
Noninterest expense excluding loss on prepayment of debt 33,471   32,914   32,016   31,461   33,701
Income (loss) before income tax provision (credit) 24,777   31,131   32,082   24,855   (61,990)
Income tax provision (credit) 6,183   8,426   8,714   5,800   (22,655)
Net income (loss) 18,594   22,705   23,368   19,055   (39,335)
U.S. Treasury preferred dividends 0   0   0   1,474   1,428
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders $18,594   $22,705   $23,368   $17,581   ($40,763)
                   
PER COMMON SHARE:                  
Basic earnings per share $1.51   $1.86   $1.92   $1.45   ($4.40)
Diluted earnings per share $1.50   $1.85   $1.92   $1.45   ($4.40)
Cash dividends declared per share $1.00   $0.84   $0.58   $0.39   $0.72
Book value per common share at period-end $14.49   $14.89   $13.77   $11.43   $10.46
Tangible book value per common share at period-end $13.51   $13.91   $12.77   $10.42   $9.43
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic 12,352,383   12,235,748   12,162,045   12,131,039   9,271,869
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted 12,382,790   12,260,208   12,166,768   12,131,039   9,271,869
                   
END OF PERIOD BALANCES (In Thousands)                  
Available-for-sale securities $482,658   $472,577   $481,685   $443,956   $396,288
Gross loans 644,303   683,910   708,315   730,411   721,011
Allowance for loan losses 8,663   6,857   7,705   9,107   8,265
Total assets 1,237,695   1,286,907   1,323,735   1,316,588   1,321,795
Deposits 954,516   1,006,106   1,018,206   1,004,348   926,789
Borrowings 96,723   89,379   130,313   166,908   235,471
Stockholders' equity 179,472   182,786   167,385   138,944   152,410
Common stockholders' equity (stockholders' equity,                  
  excluding preferred stock) 179,472   182,786   167,385   138,944   126,661
                   
AVERAGE BALANCES (In Thousands)                  
Total assets 1,237,096   1,305,163   1,313,445   1,326,145   1,296,086
Earning assets 1,145,340   1,199,538   1,208,584   1,205,608   1,208,280
Gross loans 656,495   700,241   714,421   721,997   728,748
Deposits 964,031   1,008,469   1,001,125   965,615   886,703
Stockholders' equity 181,412   175,822   152,718   150,133   141,787

  

11
 

 

  As of or for the Year Ended December 31,    
  2013 2012 2011 2010 2009
KEY RATIOS          
Return on average assets 1.50% 1.74% 1.78% 1.44% -3.03%
Return on average equity 10.25% 12.91% 15.30% 12.69% -27.74%
Average equity to average assets 14.66% 13.47% 11.63% 11.32% 10.94%
Net interest margin (1) 4.05% 4.26% 4.22% 3.81% 3.84%
Efficiency (2) 53.27% 48.82% 49.37% 52.64% 57.00%
Cash dividends as a % of diluted earnings per share 66.67% 45.41% 30.21% 26.90% NM
Tier 1 leverage 13.79% 12.53% 10.93% 9.20% 9.86%
Tier 1 risk-based capital 25.10% 22.86% 19.95% 15.87% 16.70%
Total risk-based capital 26.59% 24.01% 21.17% 17.17% 17.89%
Tangible common equity/tangible assets 13.66% 13.39% 11.84% 9.71% 8.72%
Nonperforming assets/total assets 1.53% 0.82% 0.73% 0.92% 0.76%
Nonperforming loans/total loans 2.80% 1.41% 1.19% 1.58% 1.27%
Allowance for loan losses/total loans 1.34% 1.00% 1.09% 1.25% 1.15%
Net charge-offs/average loans 0.04% 0.16% 0.16% 0.05% 0.04%

 

NM = Not a meaningful ratio.

 

(1) Rates of return on tax-exempt securities and loans are calculated on a fully-taxable equivalent basis.

 

(2) The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing: (a) total noninterest expense excluding losses from prepayment of debt, by (b) the sum of net interest income (including income from tax-exempt securities and loans on a fully-taxable equivalent basis) and noninterest income excluding securities gains or losses.

 

12
 

 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Certain statements in this section and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements. Citizens & Northern Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Corporation) intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements, which are not historical facts, are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, business objectives and expectations, and are generally identifiable by the use of words such as, "should", “likely”, "expect", “plan”, "anticipate", “target”, “forecast”, and “goal”. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, may be beyond management’s control and could cause results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors which could have a material, adverse impact on the operations and future prospects of the Corporation include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

·changes in monetary and fiscal policies of the Federal Reserve Board and the U.S. Government, particularly related to changes in interest rates
·changes in general economic conditions
·legislative or regulatory changes
·downturn in demand for loan, deposit and other financial services in the Corporation’s market area
·increased competition from other banks and non-bank providers of financial services
·technological changes and increased technology-related costs
·changes in accounting principles, or the application of generally accepted accounting principles.

 

These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.

 

EARNINGS OVERVIEW

 

In 2013, net income totaled $18,594,000, or $1.51 per common share - basic and $1.50 per share – diluted, as compared to $1.86 per share – basic and $1.85 per share – diluted in 2012 and $1.92 per basic and diluted share in 2011. The results for 2013 represented a return on average assets of 1.50% and a return on average equity of 10.25%.

 

2013 vs. 2012

 

Net income for 2013 of $18,594,000 was $4,111,000 (18.1%) lower than 2012 net income. Some of the more significant highlights related to annual earnings are as follows:

 

·Net interest income totaled $43,149,000 in 2013, down $4,452,000 (9.4%) from 2012. In 2013, yields earned on securities and loans fell by more than the corresponding drop in interest rates paid on deposits and borrowings. While the fully taxable equivalent net interest margin of 4.05% in 2013 was high by historical standards over the past 20 years, it was down 0.21% from 2012. Average earning assets declined in 2013 by $54.2 million, reflecting a reduction in average loans outstanding of $43.7 million, and average deposits decreased $44.4 million. Also, net interest income in 2012 was enhanced by the recovery of a security that had been written down in prior years, resulting in income (accretion) of $855,000.

 

·The provision for loan losses $2,047,000 in 2013, as compared to $288,000 in 2012. The increase in the provision in 2013 included the effects of establishing an allowance of $1,552,000 on loans to one commercial borrower.

 

·In 2013, noninterest revenue, excluding net realized gains on available-for-sale securities, totaled $16,451,000, which exceeded the total 2012 amount by $68,000. Gains from sales of loans totaled $2,191,000 in 2013, an increase of $266,000 over the 2012 total. The increase in gains from sales of loans in 2013 resulted mainly from an increase in the fair value of servicing rights associated with mortgage loans sold with servicing retained. Total Trust and brokerage revenue of $4,871,000 in the year ended December 31, 2013 was $223,000 (4.8%) higher than the total for 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the net loss from disposals of premises and equipment totaled ($16,000) as compared to net gains of $270,000 in 2012, mainly from an insurance recovery in 2012 associated with a flood-related claim.

 

13
 

 

·In 2013 and 2012, the Corporation generated gains from sales of securities and also incurred losses from prepayment of borrowings. Realized gains from securities totaled $1,718,000 in the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to $2,682,000 in 2012, while losses from prepayment of borrowings amounted to $1,023,000 in 2013 as compared to $2,333,000 in 2012.

 

·Noninterest expenses, excluding losses from prepayment of borrowings, totaled $33,471,000 in 2013, an increase of $557,000 over the corresponding total for 2012. In 2013, the Corporation incurred professional fees expense of $724,000 related to a consulting engagement in which the consulting firm identified recommendations for potential increases in revenues, mainly related to service charges on deposit accounts. Also, in 2013, C&N incurred professional fees expense of $315,000 from a consulting project related to debit card operations and electronic funds processing, for which reductions in electronic funds processing expenses and other benefits are expected to be realized over approximately the next five years. Mainly as a result of the consulting engagements described above, professional fees expense was $1,048,000 higher in 2013 as compared to 2012. Pensions and other employee benefit costs were $347,000 lower in 2013 than in 2012, including a reduction of $171,000 in health insurance expense associated with the Corporation’s partially self-insured plan due to a lower amount of claims.

 

2012 vs. 2011

 

In 2012, net income of $22,705,000 was $663,000 (2.8%) lower than 2011 net income. Some of the more significant highlights are as follows:

 

·Net interest income totaled $47,601,000 in 2012, down slightly ($99,000) from 2011. The fully taxable equivalent net interest margin of 4.26% in 2012 was 0.04% higher than the 2011 margin, while total average earning assets were 0.7% lower in 2012. In 2012 and 2011, net interest income included the benefit of accretion from the recovery of a previous write-down on a security, including a benefit of $855,000 in 2012 and $825,000 in 2011.

 

·The provision for loan losses was $288,000 in 2012 as compared to a credit (reduction in expense) of $285,000 in 2011. The provision for loan losses in 2012 included charges related to a few larger commercial loans, while both 2012 and 2011 included reductions in the general components of the allowance for loan losses attributable to reductions in total loans outstanding.

 

·Total noninterest revenue, excluding realized gains and losses from available-for-sale securities, totaled $16,383,000 in 2012, or $2,486,000 more than the corresponding 2011 amount. In 2011, noninterest revenue included an impairment loss of $948,000 related to an investment in a real estate limited partnership. The increase in noninterest revenue for 2012 included a significant increase in gains from sales of residential mortgage loans, which totaled $1,925,000 in 2012, up $818,000 over 2011. Trust revenues totaled $3,847,000 in 2012, an increase of $375,000 (10.8%) over 2011, while brokerage revenues of $801,000 increased $161,000 (25.2%) over 2011. Service charges on deposit accounts of $5,036,000 in 2012 were up $263,000 (5.5%) over 2011.

 

·In 2012, pre-tax net realized gains from securities totaled $2,682,000, while losses were incurred from prepayment of borrowings totaling $2,333,000. In comparison, security gains totaled $2,216,000 in 2011, and there were no losses from prepayments of borrowings. In both years, securities gains included significant amounts from sales of pooled trust-preferred securities that had previously been written off. The loss from pre-payment of borrowings included third quarter 2012 losses of $2,190,000 from prepayment of principal of $12 million on long-term borrowings (repurchase agreements) with an average interest rate of 3.93%.

 

·Noninterest expense, excluding the loss from prepayment of borrowings, was $32,914,000 in 2012, up $898,000 (2.8%) from 2011. Salaries and wages were $504,000, or 3.6%, higher for 2012 as compared to 2011, including an increase in stock-based compensation of $98,000. The increase in noninterest expense in 2012 includes an increase in other operating expense of $376,000, mainly from increases in legal fees related to lending and collection matters and expenses related to other real estate properties. Software subscriptions expense increased $187,000 in 2012 over 2011, reflecting costs associated with lending-related software. Automated teller machine and debit card processing expenses increased $110,000 in 2012 over 2011, reflecting an increase in debit card transaction volume and vendor fee increases. FDIC assessments were $199,000 lower in 2012 than in 2011, reflecting the benefit of a change in the FDIC’s method for determining assessments that became effective in the second quarter 2011. Occupancy expense was $162,000 lower in 2012 as compared to 2011, in part due to reduced costs stemming from the 2011 sale of the Court Street, Williamsport location, and corresponding lease back of approximately 18% of the space that had been previously utilized.

 

14
 

 

More detailed information concerning fluctuations in the Corporation’s earnings results are provided in other sections of Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

The presentation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect many of the reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from these estimates

 

A material estimate that is particularly susceptible to significant change is the determination of the allowance for loan losses. The Corporation maintains an allowance for loan losses that represents management’s estimate of the losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date and recorded as a reduction of the investment in loans. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate and reasonable. Notes 1 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements provide an overview of the process management uses for evaluating and determining the allowance for loan losses, and additional discussion of the allowance for loan losses is provided in a separate section later in Management’s Discussion and Analysis. Given the very subjective nature of identifying and valuing loan losses, it is likely that well-informed individuals could make materially different assumptions, and could, therefore calculate a materially different allowance value. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, changes in economic conditions may necessitate revisions in future years. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Corporation to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their judgments of information available to them at the time of their examination.

 

Another material estimate is the calculation of fair values of the Corporation’s debt securities. For most of the Corporation’s debt securities, the Corporation receives estimated fair values of debt securities from an independent valuation service, or from brokers. In developing fair values, the valuation service and the brokers use estimates of cash flows, based on historical performance of similar instruments in similar interest rate environments. Based on experience, management is aware that estimated fair values of debt securities tend to vary among brokers and other valuation services.

 

As described in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”). In making that evaluation, consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) whether the Corporation intends to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery. Management’s assessments of the likelihood and potential for recovery in value of securities are subjective and based on sensitive assumptions.

 

NET INTEREST INCOME

 

The Corporation’s primary source of operating income is net interest income, which is equal to the difference between the amounts of interest income and interest expense. Tables I, II and III include information regarding the Corporation’s net interest income in 2013, 2012, and 2011. In each of these tables, the amounts of interest income earned on tax-exempt securities and loans have been adjusted to a fully taxable-equivalent basis. Accordingly, the net interest income amounts reflected in these tables exceed the amounts presented in the consolidated financial statements. The discussion that follows is based on amounts in the tables.

 

In 2009 and the first quarter 2010, the Corporation recorded OTTI on its holding of a trust preferred security issued by Carolina First Mortgage Loan Trust, a subsidiary of The South Financial Group, Inc. In the fourth quarter 2010, The Toronto-Dominion Bank acquired The South Financial Group, Inc., made a payment for the full amount of previously deferred interest, and resumed quarterly payments on the security. The Corporation recognized a material change in the expected cash flows and recorded accretion income (included in interest income) to offset the previous OTTI charges as an adjustment to the security’s yield over its remaining life. Accretion income from this security totaled $855,000 in 2012 and $825,000 in 2011. The security had a face amount of $2,000,000 and matured in May 2012.

 

15
 

 

Excluding interest income (including accretion) and the average balance of this security from the calculations used to determine Tables I, II and III, the interest rate spread and interest margin (fully taxable equivalent net interest income divided by average total earning assets) would be as follows:

 

  Year Ended December 31,
  2013 2012 2011
Interest rate spread:      
  Actual from Table II 3.88% 4.04% 3.96%
  Excluding Carolina First security 3.88% 3.97% 3.89%
       
Interest margin:      
  Actual from Table II 4.05% 4.26% 4.22%
  Excluding Carolina First security 4.05% 4.18% 4.14%

 

2013 vs. 2012

 

Fully taxable equivalent net interest income was $46,384,000 in 2013, $4,657,000 (9.1%) lower than in 2012. As shown in Table III, in 2013 compared to 2012, interest rate changes had the effect of decreasing net interest income $3,743,000, and net changes in volume had the effect of decreasing net interest income $914,000. The most significant components of the rate change in net interest income in 2013 were a decrease in interest income of $2,615,000 attributable to lower rates earned on loans receivable and a decrease in interest income of $2,554,000 attributable to lower rates earned on available-for-sale securities, partially offset by a decrease in interest expense of $1,413,000 due to lower rates paid on interest-bearing deposits. The most significant components of the volume change in net interest income in 2013 were a decrease in interest income of $2,588,000 attributable to a decline in the balance of loans receivable, a decrease in interest expense of $1,180,000 attributable to a reduction in the balance of borrowed funds, and a decrease in interest expense of $691,000 attributable to a reduction in the balance of interest-bearing deposits (primarily certificates of deposit). As presented in Table II, the “Interest Rate Spread” (excess of average rate of return on earning assets over average cost of funds on interest-bearing liabilities) was 3.88% in 2013, as compared to 4.04% in 2012.

 

INTEREST INCOME AND EARNING ASSETS

 

Interest income totaled $52,149,000 in 2013, a decrease of 13.2% from 2012. Interest and fees on loans receivable decreased $5,203,000, or 12.2%. As indicated in Table II, average available-for-sale securities (at amortized cost) totaled $461,564,000 in 2013, a decrease of $2,785,000 (0.6%) from 2012. Net contraction in the Corporation’s available-for-sale securities portfolio was primarily made up of U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities and trust preferred securities. This contraction was partially offset by increases in the balances of U.S. Government agency bonds, municipal securities, and U.S. Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations. The Corporation’s yield on securities fell in 2012 and 2013 because of low market interest rates, the maturity of the Carolina First security noted above, calls on municipal bonds and trust preferred securities, and prepayments on mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. The average rate of return on available-for-sale securities was 3.12% for 2013 and 3.67% in 2012.

 

The average balance of gross loans receivable decreased 6.2% to $656,495,000 in 2013 from $700,241,000 in 2012. The Corporation experienced contraction in the balance of loans receivable due to borrowers prepaying or refinancing existing loans combined with modest demand for new loans. The decline in the balance of the residential mortgage portfolio was also affected by management’s decision to sell a significant portion of newly originated residential mortgages on the secondary market. The Corporation’s average rate of return on loans receivable declined to 5.73% in 2013 from 6.11% in 2012.

 

The average balance of interest-bearing due from banks decreased to $26,159,000 in 2013 from $32,337,000 in 2012. This has consisted primarily of balances held by the Federal Reserve and also includes other overnight deposits and FDIC-insured certificates of deposit issued by other financial institutions.

 

INTEREST EXPENSE AND INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES

 

Interest expense fell $3,266,000, or 36.2%, to $5,765,000 in 2013 from $9,031,000 in 2012. Table II shows that the overall cost of funds on interest-bearing liabilities fell to 0.67% in 2013 from 0.97% in 2012.

 

Total average deposits (interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing) decreased 4.4%, to $964,031,000 in 2013 from $1,008,469,000 in 2012. Decreases in the average balances of certificates of deposit, Individual Retirement Accounts, and money market accounts were partially offset by increases in average balances of interest checking and savings accounts. Consistent with continuing low short-term market interest rates, the average rates incurred on certificates of deposit and Individual Retirement Accounts have decreased significantly in 2013 as compared to 2012.

 

16
 

 

Total average borrowed funds decreased $29,723,000 to $82,328,000 in 2013 from $112,051,000 in 2012. During 2012 and 2013, the Corporation has paid off long-term borrowings as they matured using the cash flow received from loans and investment securities. In 2012, the Corporation prepaid principal totaling $17,000,000 on long-term borrowings (repurchase agreements); the Corporation incurred losses from the prepayments totaling $2,333,000. In March 2013, the Corporation prepaid principal of $7,000,000 on a long-term borrowing (repurchase agreement) with a rate of 3.60%; the Corporation incurred a loss from the prepayment totaling $1,023,000, which is reported in Other Expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Management expects that the prepayments will have a favorable effect on the net interest margin in the future. After the effect of the prepayments, the remaining balance of long-term borrowings under repurchase agreements was $61,000,000 at December 31, 2013. The average rate on borrowed funds was 3.72% in 2013, compared to 3.77% in 2012.

 

2012 vs. 2011

 

Fully taxable equivalent net interest income was $51,041,000 in 2012, $86,000 (0.2%) higher than in 2011. As shown in Table III, net changes in volume had the effect of increasing net interest income $961,000 in 2012 compared to 2011, and interest rate changes had the effect of decreasing net interest income $875,000. The most significant components of the volume change in net interest income in 2012 were a decrease in interest expense of $1,203,000 attributable to a reduction in the balance of borrowed funds, a decrease in interest expense of $411,000 attributable to a reduction in the balance of interest-bearing deposits (primarily certificates of deposit and Individual Retirement Accounts), and a decrease in interest income of $887,000 attributable to a decline in the balance of loans receivable. The most significant components of the rate change in net interest income in 2012 were a decrease in interest expense of $2,894,000 due to lower rates paid on interest-bearing deposits, a decrease in interest income of $2,072,000 attributable to lower rates earned on available-for-sale securities and a decrease in interest income of $1,733,000 attributable to lower rates earned on loans receivable. As presented in Table II, the “Interest Rate Spread” (excess of average rate of return on earning assets over average cost of funds on interest-bearing liabilities) was 4.04% in 2012, as compared to 3.96% in 2011.

 

INTEREST INCOME AND EARNING ASSETS

 

Interest income totaled $60,072,000 in 2012, a decrease of 6.9% from 2011. Interest and fees on loans receivable decreased $2,620,000, or 5.8% while income from available-for-sale securities decreased $1,914,000, or 10.1%. As indicated in Table II, average available-for-sale securities (at amortized cost) totaled $464,349,000 in 2012, an increase of $2,445,000 (0.5%) from 2011. Net growth in the Corporation’s available-for-sale securities portfolio was primarily made up of U.S. Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations and municipal securities. This growth was partially offset by reductions in the balances of mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Government agency bonds, and trust preferred securities. The Corporation’s yield on taxable securities fell in 2011 and 2012 because of rapid prepayments on mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations as well as low market interest rates. The average rate of return on available-for-sale securities was 3.67% for 2012 and 4.11% in 2011.

 

The average balance of gross loans receivable decreased 2.0% to $700,241,000 in 2012 from $714,421,000 in 2011. The Corporation experienced contraction in the balance of loans receivable due to borrowers prepaying or refinancing existing loans combined with modest demand for new loans. The decline in the balance of the residential mortgage portfolio was also affected by management’s decision to sell a significant portion of newly originated residential mortgages on the secondary market. The Corporation’s average rate of return on loans receivable declined to 6.11% in 2012 from 6.36% in 2011.

 

The average balance of interest-bearing due from banks increased to $32,337,000 in 2012 from $31,359,000 in 2011. This consisted primarily of balances held by the Federal Reserve, as well as FDIC-insured certificates of deposit. During the fourth quarter 2011, the Corporation began investing in FDIC-insured certificates of deposit issued by other financial institutions and maturing within five years; these investments totaled $4,820,000 at December 31, 2012. The average balance of certificates of deposit issued by other financial institutions increased to $4,554,000 in 2012 from $677,000 in 2011.

 

INTEREST EXPENSE AND INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES

 

Interest expense fell $4,525,000, or 33.4%, to $9,031,000 in 2012 from $13,556,000 in 2011. Table II shows that the overall cost of funds on interest-bearing liabilities fell to 0.97% in 2012 from 1.38% in 2011.

 

17
 

 

Total average deposits (interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing) increased 0.7%, to $1,008,469,000 in 2012 from $1,001,125,000 in 2011. Increases in the average balances of demand deposits, savings accounts, and money market accounts were partially offset by decreases in Individual Retirement Accounts and certificates of deposit. Consistent with continuing low short-term market interest rates, the average rates incurred on deposit accounts decreased significantly in 2012 as compared to 2011.

 

Variable-rate accounts made up $130,833,000 of the average balance in Individual Retirement Accounts in 2012 and $144,008,000 in 2011. Prior to May 2011, substantially all of these accounts were paid interest at a rate that could change quarterly at management’s discretion with a contractual floor of 3.00%. Effective in May 2011, the rate floor was removed; following this change, the rate paid on these accounts was lowered several times. As shown in Table II, the average rate on Individual Retirement Accounts decreased to 0.80% in 2012 from 2.04% in 2011.

 

Total average borrowed funds decreased $40,059,000 to $112,051,000 in 2012 from $152,110,000 in 2011. During 2011 and 2012, the Corporation paid off long-term borrowings as they matured using the cash flow received from loans and investment securities. In May and September 2012, the Corporation prepaid principal totaling $17,000,000 on long-term borrowings (repurchase agreements); the Corporation incurred losses from the prepayments totaling $2,333,000. The average rate on borrowed funds was 3.77% in 2012, compared to 3.58% in 2011.

 

The average balance of “RepoSweep” arrangements, which are used by the Corporation to borrow funds from commercial banking customers on an overnight basis and included within short-term borrowings, declined to $4,454,000 in 2012 from $17,216,000 in 2011 primarily as a result of changes to service charges assessed on related business checking accounts. During 2012, the Corporation took several short-term and overnight advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB-Pittsburgh) to offset seasonal declines in deposit balances and meet other liquidity needs. Short-term and overnight advances averaged $2,377,000 in 2012 with no such advances outstanding during 2011.

 

18
 

 

TABLE I -  ANALYSIS OF INTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSE      
           
           
  Years Ended December 31,  Increase/(Decrease)
(In Thousands) 2013 2012 2011 2013/2012 2012/2011
           
INTEREST INCOME          
Available-for-sale securities:          
     Taxable $7,105 $9,334 $11,297 ($2,229) ($1,963)
     Tax-exempt 7,296 7,725 7,676 (429) 49
          Total available-for-sale securities 14,401 17,059 18,973 (2,658) (1,914)
Interest-bearing due from banks 105 114 73 (9) 41
Loans held for sale 54 107 53 (53) 54
Loans receivable:          
     Taxable 35,484 40,453 43,178 (4,969) (2,725)
     Tax-exempt 2,105 2,339 2,234 (234) 105
          Total loans receivable 37,589 42,792 45,412 (5,203) (2,620)
Total Interest Income 52,149 60,072 64,511 (7,923) (4,439)
           
INTEREST EXPENSE          
Interest-bearing deposits:          
     Interest checking 211 206 399 5 (193)
     Money market 290 354 494 (64) (140)
     Savings 117 108 161 9 (53)
     Certificates of deposit 1,522 3,002 3,905 (1,480) (903)
     Individual Retirement Accounts 562 1,136 3,150 (574) (2,014)
     Other time deposits 1 1 3 0 (2)
          Total interest-bearing deposits 2,703 4,807 8,112 (2,104) (3,305)
Borrowed funds:          
     Short-term 9 10 23 (1) (13)
     Long-term 3,053 4,214 5,421 (1,161) (1,207)
          Total borrowed funds 3,062 4,224 5,444 (1,162) (1,220)
Total Interest Expense 5,765 9,031 13,556 (3,266) (4,525)
           
Net Interest Income $46,384 $51,041 $50,955 ($4,657) $86

 

(1)Interest income from tax-exempt securities and loans has been adjusted to a fully taxable-equivalent basis, using the Corporation’s marginal federal income tax rate of 35% in 2013 and 2012 and 34% in 2011.
(2)Fees on loans are included with interest on loans and amounted to $1,338,000 in 2013, $1,427,000 in 2012, and $1,312,000 in 2011.

 

19
 

  

TABLE II - ANALYSIS OF AVERAGE DAILY BALANCES AND RATES        
(Dollars in Thousands)            
  Year   Year   Year  
  Ended Rate of Ended Rate of Ended Rate of
  12/31/2013 Return/ 12/31/2012 Return/ 12/31/2011 Return/
  Average Cost of Average Cost of Average Cost of
  Balance Funds % Balance Funds % Balance Funds %
EARNING ASSETS            
Available-for-sale securities,            
     at amortized cost:            
     Taxable $330,980 2.15% $332,911 2.80% $333,441 3.39%
     Tax-exempt 130,584 5.59% 131,438 5.88% 128,463 5.98%
          Total available-for-sale securities 461,564 3.12% 464,349 3.67% 461,904 4.11%
Interest-bearing due from banks 26,159 0.40% 32,337 0.35% 31,359 0.23%
Federal funds sold 4 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
Loans held for sale 1,118 4.83% 2,611 4.10% 900 5.89%
Loans receivable:            
     Taxable 620,412 5.72% 662,751 6.10% 679,357 6.36%
     Tax-exempt 36,083 5.83% 37,490 6.24% 35,064 6.37%
          Total loans receivable 656,495 5.73% 700,241 6.11% 714,421 6.36%
          Total Earning Assets 1,145,340 4.55% 1,199,538 5.01% 1,208,584 5.34%
Cash 16,854   17,408   17,762  
Unrealized gain/loss on securities 8,875   18,444   7,105  
Allowance for loan losses (7,204)   (7,688)   (8,688)  
Bank premises and equipment 18,154   18,956   21,381  
Intangible Asset - Core Deposit Intangible 113   176   272  
Intangible Asset - Goodwill 11,942   11,942   11,942  
Other assets 43,022   46,387   55,087  
Total Assets $1,237,096   $1,305,163   $1,313,445  
             
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES            
Interest-bearing deposits:            
     Interest checking $174,790 0.12% $163,840 0.13% $162,583 0.25%
     Money market 203,023 0.14% 208,814 0.17% 206,612 0.24%
     Savings 117,055 0.10% 108,218 0.10% 97,099 0.17%
     Certificates of deposit 148,598 1.02% 194,175 1.55% 205,231 1.90%
     Individual Retirement Accounts 129,255 0.43% 142,315 0.80% 154,688 2.04%
     Other time deposits 1,062 0.09% 1,191 0.08% 1,231 0.24%
          Total interest-bearing deposits 773,783 0.35% 818,553 0.59% 827,444 0.98%
Borrowed funds:            
     Short-term 6,422 0.14% 6,831 0.15% 17,216 0.13%
     Long-term 75,906 4.02% 105,220 4.00% 134,894 4.02%
          Total borrowed funds 82,328 3.72% 112,051 3.77% 152,110 3.58%
          Total Interest-bearing Liabilities 856,111 0.67% 930,604 0.97% 979,554 1.38%
Demand deposits 190,248   189,916   173,681  
Other liabilities 9,325   8,821   7,492  
Total Liabilities 1,055,684   1,129,341   1,160,727  
Stockholders' equity, excluding            
     other comprehensive income/loss 175,893   164,316   148,324  
Other comprehensive income/loss 5,519   11,506   4,394  
Total Stockholders' Equity 181,412   175,822   152,718  
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $1,237,096   $1,305,163   $1,313,445  
Interest Rate Spread   3.88%   4.04%   3.96%
Net Interest Income/Earning Assets   4.05%   4.26%   4.22%
             
Total Deposits (Interest-bearing            
     and Demand) $964,031   $1,008,469   $1,001,125  

 

(1)Rates of return on tax-exempt securities and loans are presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, using the Corporation’s marginal federal income tax rate of 35% in 2013 and 2012 and 34% in 2011.
(2)Nonaccrual loans have been included with loans for the purpose of analyzing net interest earnings.

 

20
 

 

TABLE III -  ANALYSIS OF VOLUME AND RATE CHANGES        
(In Thousands) Year Ended  12/31/13 vs. 12/31/12 Year Ended  12/31/12 vs. 12/31/11
  Change in Change in Total Change in Change in Total
  Volume Rate Change Volume Rate Change
EARNING ASSETS            
Available-for-sale securities:            
     Taxable ($54) ($2,175) ($2,229) ($18) ($1,945) ($1,963)
     Tax-exempt (50) (379) (429) 176 (127) 49
          Total available-for-sale securities (104) (2,554) (2,658) 158 (2,072) (1,914)
Interest-bearing due from banks (24) 15 (9) 2 39 41
Loans held for sale (69) 16 (53) 74 (20) 54
Loans receivable:            
     Taxable (2,502) (2,467) (4,969) (1,039) (1,686) (2,725)
     Tax-exempt (86) (148) (234) 152 (47) 105
          Total loans receivable (2,588) (2,615) (5,203) (887) (1,733) (2,620)
Total Interest Income (2,785) (5,138) (7,923) (653) (3,786) (4,439)
             
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES            
Interest-bearing deposits:            
     Interest checking 13 (8) 5 3 (196) (193)
     Money market (10) (54) (64) 5 (145) (140)
     Savings 9 0 9 16 (69) (53)
     Certificates of deposit (607) (873) (1,480) (201) (702) (903)
     Individual Retirement Accounts (96) (478) (574) (234) (1,780) (2,014)
     Other time deposits 0 0 0 0 (2) (2)
          Total interest-bearing deposits (691) (1,413) (2,104) (411) (2,894) (3,305)
Borrowed funds:            
     Short-term (1) 0 (1) (15) 2 (13)
     Long-term (1,179) 18 (1,161) (1,188) (19) (1,207)
          Total borrowed funds (1,180) 18 (1,162) (1,203) (17) (1,220)
Total Interest Expense (1,871) (1,395) (3,266) (1,614) (2,911) (4,525)
             
Net Interest Income ($914) ($3,743) ($4,657) $961 ($875) $86

 

(1)Changes in income on tax-exempt securities and loans are presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, using the Corporation’s marginal federal income tax rate of 35% in 2013 and 2012 and 34% in 2011.
(2)The change in interest due to both volume and rates has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.

 

21
 

 

NONINTEREST INCOME

Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

 

The table below presents a comparison of noninterest income and excludes realized gains on available for sale securities, which are discussed in the “Earnings Overview” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

 

TABLE IV - COMPARISON OF NONINTEREST INCOME        
 (In Thousands)     $ %
  2013 2012  Change  Change
 Service charges on deposit accounts $4,966 $5,036 ($70) (1.4)
 Service charges and fees 877 929 (52) (5.6)
 Trust and financial management revenue 4,087 3,847 240 6.2
 Brokerage revenue 784 801 (17) (2.1)
 Insurance commissions, fees and premiums 170 221 (51) (23.1)
 Interchange revenue from debit card transactions 1,941 1,938 3 0.2
 Net gains from sales of loans 2,191 1,925 266 13.8
 Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance 399 455 (56) (12.3)
 Net (loss) gain from premises and equipment (16) 270 (286) (105.9)
 Other operating income 1,052 961 91 9.5
 Total other operating income before realized        
 (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities, net $16,451 $16,383 $68 0.4
         
      $ %
  2012 2011 Change  Change
 Service charges on deposit accounts $5,036 $4,773 $263 5.5
 Service charges and fees 929 849 80 9.4
 Trust and financial management revenue 3,847 3,472 375 10.8
 Brokerage revenue 801 640 161 25.2
 Insurance commissions, fees and premiums 221 257 (36) (14.0)
 Interchange revenue from debit card transactions 1,938 1,922 16 0.8
 Net gains from sales of loans 1,925 1,107 818 73.9
 Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance 455 509 (54) (10.6)
 Net gain from premises and equipment 270 324 (54) (16.7)
 Impairment loss on limited partnership investment 0 (948) 948 (100.0)
 Other operating income 961 992 (31) (3.1)
 Total other operating income before realized        
 (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities, net $16,383 $13,897 $2,486 17.9

 

Total noninterest income, excluding realized gains on available-for-sale securities, increased $68,000 or .4% in 2013 compared to 2012. In 2012, total noninterest income increased $2,486,000 (17.9%) from 2011. Total noninterest income in 2011 included an impairment loss of $948,000 related to an investment in a real estate limited partnership (discussed in more detail below). Excluding the 2011 impairment loss on the limited partnership investment and gains from available-for-sale securities, noninterest income increased $1,538,000 (10.4%) in 2012 over 2011. Items of significance related to noninterest income are as follows:

 

2013 vs. 2012

 

Net gains from sales of loans increased $266,000 in 2013. Since December 2009, the Corporation has sold a significant amount of residential mortgage loans into the secondary market through the MPF Xtra program administered by the Federal Home Loan Banks of Pittsburgh and Chicago. Volume remained brisk throughout most of 2013, slowing somewhat in the fourth quarter as long-term interest rates rose. Overall, the sales volume in 2013 was comparable to 2012, with the aggregate increase in revenue attributable to higher values of servicing rights on 2013 originations, mainly due to estimated longer average lives of loans caused by an increase in long-term interest rates.

 

22
 

 

In 2013, Trust and financial management revenue increased $240,000, or 6.2%. Trust revenue from employee benefit and retirement services was $121,000 higher in 2013 as compared to 2012. The increase in trust revenue in 2013 reflects the impact of new business obtained as well as higher valuations of U.S. equities and fixed income securities throughout most of the period. Assets under management by the Corporation’s Trust and financial management group totaled $796,115,000 at December 31, 2013, an increase of 12.5% over the total one year earlier.

 

The net gain from premises and equipment of $270,000 in 2012 included a gain of $272,000 from the excess of insurance proceeds received over the historical book value of assets replaced or reconstructed at the Athens, PA branch, which was damaged by a flood in September 2011 and remained closed until it was re-opened in April 2012. The loss of $16,000 in 2013 included charges related to the abandonment of certain communications equipment.

 

2012 vs. 2011

 

In 2011, the Corporation reported an impairment loss of $948,000 related to an investment in a real estate limited partnership. Based on updated financial information, management prepared an estimated valuation based on cash flow analysis. That analysis showed the estimated cash flows to be derived from the limited partnership’s activities would not be sufficient to provide a return on the Corporation’s limited partnership investment. Accordingly, management made the decision to completely write-off the limited partnership investment in 2011.

 

Net gains from sales of loans increased $818,000 in 2012. The increase in revenue from sales in 2012 reflected the impact of significant refinancing activity, as market interest rates fell throughout most of the year.

 

Trust and financial management revenue increased $375,000, or 10.8%, in 2012, including an increase in revenue from employee benefit and retirement services of $129,000. The increase in trust revenue in 2012 reflects the impact of new business obtained as well as higher valuations of U.S. equities and fixed income securities throughout most of the period. Assets under management by the Corporation’s Trust and financial management group totaled $707,912,000 at December 31, 2012, an increase of 11.5% over the total one year earlier.

 

In 2012, service charges on deposit accounts increased $263,000, or 5.5%, reflecting changes in prices and terms for some types of fees effective at the beginning of 2012.

 

In 2012, brokerage revenue increased $161,000, or 25.2%, reflecting increased sales of annuities used by customers as investment vehicles in retirement.

 

As described above, the net gain from premises and equipment of $270,000 in 2012 included a gain of $272,000 from the excess of insurance proceeds received over the historical book value of assets replaced or reconstructed at the Athens, PA branch. In 2011, the Corporation realized net gains from sales of premises and equipment totaling $324,000, including a gain of $329,000 from sale of the Court Street, Williamsport, PA location. The Corporation has entered into a leasing arrangement to continue to utilize approximately 18% of the facility. The Corporation has accounted for the leaseback as an operating lease.

 

NONINTEREST EXPENSE

Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

 

As shown in Table V below, total noninterest expense decreased $753,000 in 2013 as compared to 2012. As discussed in the Earnings Overview section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis, in 2013, the Corporation incurred losses totaling $1,023,000 and, in 2012, losses total $2,333,000 from prepayment of borrowings (repurchase agreements). Excluding losses from prepayment of debt, total noninterest expense was $557,000 (1.7%) higher in 2013 as compared to 2012. In 2012, total noninterest expense, excluding losses on prepayment of debt, increased $898,000 (2.8%) over 2011. Changes of significance (other than the previously discussed loss on prepayment of debt) are discussed in the narrative that follows.

 

23
 

 

TABLE V - COMPARISON OF NONINTEREST EXPENSE        
 (In Thousands)      
       $  %
  2013 2012  Change  Change
 Salaries and wages $14,206 $14,370 ($164) (1.1)
 Pensions and other employee benefits 4,150 4,497 (347) (7.7)
 Occupancy expense, net 2,473 2,476 (3) (0.1)
 Furniture and equipment expense 1,948 1,887 61 3.2
 FDIC Assessments 604 633 (29) (4.6)
 Pennsylvania shares tax 1,402 1,312 90 6.9
 Professional fees 1,534 486 1,048 215.6
 Automated teller machine and interchange expense 1,020 1,136 (116) (10.2)
 Software subscriptions 836 890 (54) (6.1)
 Loss on prepayment of debt 1,023 2,333 (1,310) (56.2)
 Other operating expense 5,298 5,227 71 1.4
 Total Other Expense $34,494 $35,247 ($753) (2.1)
         
       $  %
  2012 2011  Change  Change
 Salaries and wages $14,370 $13,866 $504 3.6
 Pensions and other employee benefits 4,497 4,407 90 2.0
 Occupancy expense, net 2,476 2,638 (162) (6.1)
 Furniture and equipment expense 1,887 1,932 (45) (2.3)
 FDIC Assessments 633 832 (199) (23.9)
 Pennsylvania shares tax 1,312 1,306 6 0.5
 Professional fees 486 455 31 6.8
 Automated teller machine and interchange expense 1,136 1,026 110 10.7
 Software subscriptions 890 703 187 26.6
 Loss on prepayment of debt 2,333 0 2,333 100.0
 Other operating expense 5,227 4,851 376 7.8
 Total Other Expense $35,247 $32,016 $3,231 10.1

 

2013 vs. 2012

 

Professional fees increased $1,048,000, or 215.6%.. As noted in the Earnings Overview section, the Corporation incurred professional fee expense of $315,000 in 2013 for a consulting project related to debit card operations and electronic funds processing, for which management expects the consultants’ services to result in increases in noninterest revenue and reductions in noninterest expense going forward, most significantly from an estimated total reduction in expense of $1.9 million for electronic funds processing over approximately the next 5 years. In addition, the Corporation incurred professional fees expense of $724,000 related to a consulting engagement in which the consulting firm identified recommendations for potential increases in revenues with an estimated annual total pre-tax benefit of approximately $1.3 million. Management expects to realize ongoing benefits from implementing the recommendations to a significant extent starting in the fourth quarter 2013 and thereafter, though the actual amount of benefits to be derived is difficult to estimate and is dependent on many variables.

 

Pensions and other employee benefits decreased $347,000, or 7.7%. Health care expense decreased $171,000 as the amount of claims incurred during 2013 was lower than 2012. The Corporation is self-insured for health insurance, up to a cap for catastrophic levels of losses, which are insured by a third party. Postretirement health care expense decreased $156,000, reflecting amendments to the plan that include elimination of the accrual of service time by full-time employees as well as changes to some of the age and length-of-service requirements for participants to receive some of the benefits provided under the plan. Unemployment compensation decreased $51,000 as a result of a decrease in the Corporation’s experience-based Pennsylvania rate in 2013.

 

Salaries and wages decreased $164,000, or 1.1%, mainly as a result of reduced incentive bonus compensation.

 

24
 

 

 

Automated teller machine and interchange expenses decreased $116,000, or 10.2%, mainly resulting from benefits derived from consulting project noted previously.

 

2012 vs. 2011

 

Salaries and wages increased $504,000, or 3.6%, mainly as a result of merit-based salary increases. The increase in this category in 2012 also included an increase in stock-based compensation for employees (excluding non-employee Directors) of $98,000.

 

Occupancy expense decreased $162,000, or 6.1%. Within this category, snow removal and related expenses were $52,000 lower in 2012, reflecting the milder winter weather throughout the Corporation’s market area. Depreciation expense was $118,000 lower in 2012, mainly due to the impact of the sale of the Court Street, Williamsport property in the third quarter 2011. In connection with the sale, the Corporation entered into a lease arrangement to continue to use a portion of the building. The lease is accounted for as an operating lease. Management estimates that total building-related expenses (including the effects of lower depreciation referred to above) for this location were $122,000 lower in 2012 than in 2011.

 

FDIC Assessments decreased $199,000, or 23.9%. Effective April 1, 2011, the FDIC’s method of determining assessments to banks changed, with the new methodology resulting in higher assessments to larger, more complex or higher-risk institutions, and smaller assessments to many community and small regional banks. The Corporation’s estimated first quarter 2012 FDIC assessment was substantially lower than the first quarter 2011 amount, reflecting the new methodology. The favorable decline also reflects rate changes attributed to improvements in the Corporation’s risk profile based on financial ratios.

 

Software-related subscriptions and updates, mainly related to lending-related activities, increased $187,000, or 26.6%

 

Fees paid related to interchange and ATM processing, increased $110,000 or 10.8%, reflecting increases in transaction volumes as well as nonrecurring charges related to changes in technical requirements.

 

Other operating expense increased $376,000, or 7.8%. This category includes many different types of expenses, with the most significant differences in amounts between 2012 and 2011 as follows:

 

·Expense related to a change in third-party merchant processing in 2012 of $110,000, with no corresponding expense in 2011
·Attorney fees, mainly from lending-related collection matters, up $100,000, or 47.2%
·Expenses associated with other real estate properties, up $78,000, or 92.2%

 

INCOME TAXES

 

The effective income tax rate was approximately 25% of pre-tax income in 2013, down from approximately 27% in 2012 and 2011. The lower effective tax rate in 2013 is mainly attributable to lower pre-tax income in comparison to 2012 and 2011. The Corporation’s effective tax rates differ from the statutory rate of 35% principally because of the effects of tax-exempt interest income.

 

The Corporation recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. At December 31, 2013, the net deferred tax asset was $6,344,000, up from the balance at December 31, 2012 of $1,725,000. The largest changes in temporary difference components were as follows:

 

·At December 31, 2013, net unrealized losses on available-for-securities resulted in a deferred tax asset of $541,000. In contrast, at December 31, 2012, the deferred tax liability associated with unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities was $6,228,000. The reduction in fair value of available-for-securities in 2013 was caused primarily by increases in long-term interest rates.

 

·The deferred tax asset related to loan losses increased $632,000, to $3,032,000 at December 31, 2013 as compared to $2,400,000 at December 31, 2012. The increase in this item in 2013 resulted from an increase in the allowance for loan losses for financial reporting purposes.

 

25
 

 

·In 2013, the deferred tax asset from net realized losses on securities fell to $91,000, a reduction of $1,163,000 from December 31, 2012, mainly due to the first quarter 2013 sale of a pooled trust-preferred security for which OTTI had been recorded for financial reporting purposes in previous years.

 

·The deferred tax asset representing the credit for alternative minimum tax paid fell to $1,905,000 at December 31, 2013, a reduction of $1,704,000 from December 31, 2012, as the Corporation’s federal taxable income in 2013 exceeded alternative minimum taxable income.

 

The Corporation regularly reviews deferred tax assets for recoverability based on history of earnings, expectations for future earnings and expected timing of reversals of temporary differences. Realization of deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income, including taxable income in prior carryback years, as well as future taxable income. Management believes the recorded net deferred tax asset at December 31, 2013 is fully realizable; however, if management determines the Corporation will be unable to realize all or part of the net deferred tax asset, the Corporation would adjust the deferred tax asset, which would negatively impact earnings.

 

Additional information related to income taxes is presented in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.

 

SECURITIES

 

Table VI shows the composition of the investment portfolio at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. Comparison of the amortized cost totals of available-for-sale securities at each year-end presented reflects a decrease of $10,554,000 to $454,781,000 at December 31, 2012 from December 31, 2011. This change was followed by an increase of $29,422,000 to $484,203,000 at December 31, 2013. In both 2012 and 2013, the Corporation increased its holdings of municipal bonds, agency collateralized mortgage obligations and U.S. Government agency securities. The increases were partially offset by decreases in the balances of mortgage-backed securities, trust preferred securities, and pooled trust preferred securities as management reinvested cash flows from these securities in other types of investments. Changes in the investment portfolio are discussed in more detail in the Net Interest Income section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis. As discussed in more detail in Note 7 to the financial statements, the Corporation reported net realized gains from available-for-sale securities of $1,718,000 in 2013, $2,682,000 in 2012 and $2,216,000 in 2011.

 

As reflected in Table VI, the fair value of available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2013 was $1,545,000, or 0.3%, less than the total amortized cost basis. The aggregate unrealized loss position at December 31, 2013 included an unrealized loss of $4,431,000 on debt securities, partially offset by an unrealized gain of $2,886,000 on marketable equity securities (bank stocks). Increases in intermediate-term and long-term interest rates in 2013 led to a decrease in the aggregate fair value of debt securities in 2013 in comparison to historical cost basis. Management has reviewed the Corporation’s holdings as of December 31, 2013 and concluded that unrealized losses on all of the securities in an unrealized loss position are considered temporary. Notes 6 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements provide more detail concerning the Corporation’s processes for evaluating securities for other-than-temporary impairment, and for valuation of trust-preferred securities. Management will continue to closely monitor the status of impaired securities in 2014.

 

26
 

 

TABLE VI - INVESTMENT SECURITIES

 

      As of December 31,    
  2013 2012 2011
  Amortized Fair Amortized Fair Amortized Fair
(In Thousands) Cost Value Cost Value Cost Value
             
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES:            
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies $47,382 $45,877 $30,695 $31,217 $24,877 $25,587
Obligations of states and political subdivisions:            
Tax-exempt 127,748 128,426 130,168 137,020 129,401 132,962
Taxable 35,153 34,471 24,426 24,817 14,004 14,334
Mortgage-backed securities 84,849 86,208 76,368 80,196 116,602 121,769
Collateralized mortgage obligations, Issued by U.S. Government agencies 182,373 178,092 179,770 183,510 161,818 165,131
Trust preferred securities issued by individual institutions 0 0 5,167 5,171 7,334 8,146
Collateralized debt obligations:            
Pooled trust preferred securities - senior tranches 0 0 1,615 1,613 4,996 4,638
Pooled trust preferred securities - mezzanine tranches 0 0 0 0 0 730
Other collateralized debt obligations 660 660 660 660 660 660
Total debt securities 478,165 473,734 448,869 464,204 459,692 473,957
Marketable equity securities 6,038 8,924 5,912 8,373 5,643 7,728
Total $484,203 $482,658 $454,781 $472,577 $465,335 $481,685

 

The following table presents the contractual maturities and the weighted-average yields (calculated based on amortized cost) of investment securities as of December 31, 2013. Yields on tax-exempt securities are presented on a nominal basis, that is, the yields are not presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because counterparties may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

 

(In Thousands, Except for Percentages) Within   One-   Five-   After      
  One   Five   Ten   Ten      
  Year Yield Years Yield Years Yield Years Yield Total Yield
                     
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES:                    
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies $12,434 1.73% $11,073 1.72% $23,875 1.33% $0 0.00% $47,382 1.53%
Obligations of states and political subdivisions:                    
Tax-exempt 8,823 3.29% 21,703 1.89% 37,116 2.67% 60,106 4.68% 127,748 3.53%
Taxable 3,855 1.99% 16,005 2.09% 14,728 2.40% 565 3.60% 35,153 2.24%
Trust preferred securities issued by individual institutions 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
Collateralized debt obligations:                    
Pooled trust preferred securities - senior tranches 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
Other collateralized debt obligations 626 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 34 0.00% 660 0.00%
Subtotal $25,738 2.26% $48,781 1.92% $75,719 2.19% $60,705 4.67% $210,943 2.85%
Mortgage-backed securities                 84,849 2.78%
Collateralized mortgage obligations, Issued by U.S. Government agencies                 182,373 1.95%
Total                 $478,165 2.50%

 

The Corporation’s mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations have stated maturities that may differ from actual maturities due to borrowers’ ability to prepay obligations. Cash flows from such investments are dependent upon the performance of the underlying mortgage loans and are generally influenced by the level of interest rates. As rates increase, cash flows generally decrease as prepayments on the underlying mortgage loans decrease. As rates decrease, cash flows generally increase as prepayments increase. In the table above, the entire balances and weighted-average rates for mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are shown in one period.

 

27
 

 

FINANCIAL CONDITION

 

Significant changes in the average balances of the Corporation’s earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities are described in the Net Interest Income section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis. The discussion provides useful information regarding changes in the Corporation’s balance sheet over the 3-year period ended December 31, 2013, including discussions related to available-for-sale securities, loans, deposits and borrowings. Other significant balance sheet items - the allowance for loan losses and stockholders’ equity - are discussed in separate sections of Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

 

The total of loans outstanding (without consideration of the allowance for loan losses) at December 31, 2013 reflects a total decrease of $76,708,000 (10.6%) from the balance at December 31, 2009 to the total outstanding of $644,303,000 at December 31, 2013. Loan volumes are heavily dependent on economic conditions in the Corporation’s market area, and are significantly influenced by interest rates. Since the end of 2009, the Corporation experienced a net decrease in total loans outstanding under the residential mortgage segment ($39,721,000) with more residential mortgage originations than in previous years sold into the secondary market. In September 2009, the Corporation initiated participation in the MPF Xtra program administered by the Federal Home Loan Banks of Pittsburgh and Chicago for the sale of mortgage loans to the secondary market. At December 31, 2013, the outstanding balance of residential mortgage loans originated by the Corporation, and sold with servicing retained was $145,954,000. Total commercial segment loans outstanding decreased ($28,547,000) at December 31, 2013 as compared to December 31, 2009, including a reduction of $26,176,000 at December 31, 2013 from year-end 2012. Also, in the last four years, consumer loans have steadily decreased ($8,440,000) to the December 31, 2013 balance of $10,762,000.

 

Table VIII presents loan maturity data as of December 31, 2013. The interest rate simulation model classifies certain loans under different categories than they appear in Table VII. Fixed-rate loans are shown in Table VIII based on their contractually scheduled principal repayments, and variable-rate loans are shown based on the date of the next change in rate. Table VIII shows that fixed-rate loans are approximately 38% of the loan portfolio. Of the 62% of the portfolio made up of variable-rate loans, a significant portion (45%) will re-price after more than one year. Variable-rate loans re-pricing after more than one year include significant amounts of residential and commercial real estate loans. The Corporation’s substantial investment in long-term, fixed-rate loans and variable-rate loans with extended periods until re-pricing is one of the concerns management attempts to address through interest rate risk management practices. See Part II, Item 7A for a more detailed discussion of the Corporation’s interest rate risk.

 

Total future capital purchases in 2014 are estimated at approximately $1.7 million. Management does not expect capital expenditures to have a material, detrimental effect on the Corporation’s financial condition during 2014.

 

TABLE VII - Five-year Summary of Loans by Type

(In Thousands)

  2013 % 2012 % 2011 % 2010 % 2009 %
Residential mortgage:                    
Residential mortgage loans - first liens $299,831 46.5 $311,627 45.6 $331,015 46.7 $333,012 45.6 $340,268 47.2
Residential mortgage loans - junior liens 23,040 3.6 26,748 3.9 28,851 4.1 31,590 4.3 35,734 5.0
Home equity lines of credit 34,530 5.4 33,017 4.8 30,037 4.2 26,853 3.7 23,577 3.3
1-4 Family residential construction 13,909 2.2 12,842 1.9 9,959 1.4 14,379 2.0 11,452 1.6
Total residential mortgage 371,310 57.6 384,234 56.2 399,862 56.5 405,834 55.6 411,031 57.0
Commercial:                    
Commercial loans secured by real estate 147,215 22.8 158,413 23.2 156,388 22.1 167,094 22.9 163,483 22.7
Commercial and industrial 42,387 6.6 48,442 7.1 57,191 8.1 59,005 8.1 49,753 6.9
Political subdivisions 16,291 2.5 31,789 4.6 37,620 5.3 36,480 5.0 37,598 5.2
Commercial construction 17,003 2.6 28,200 4.1 23,518 3.3 24,004 3.3 15,264 2.1
Loans secured by farmland 10,468 1.6 11,403 1.7 10,949 1.5 11,353 1.6 11,856 1.6
Multi-family (5 or more) residential 10,985 1.7 6,745 1.0 6,583 0.9 7,781 1.1 8,338 1.2
Agricultural loans 3,251 0.5 3,053 0.4 2,987 0.4 3,472 0.5 3,848 0.5
Other commercial loans 14,631 2.3 362 0.1 552 0.1 392 0.1 638 0.1
Total commercial 262,231 40.7 288,407 42.2 295,788 41.8 309,581 42.4 290,778 40.3
Consumer 10,762 1.7 11,269 1.6 12,665 1.8 14,996 2.1 19,202 2.7
Total 644,303 100.0 683,910 100.0 708,315 100.0 730,411 100.0 721,011 100.0
Less: allowance for loan losses (8,663)   (6,857)   (7,705)   (9,107)   (8,265)  
Loans, net $635,640   $677,053   $700,610   $721,304   $712,746  

 

28
 

 

TABLE VIII – LOAN MATURITY DISTRIBUTION

(In Thousands) As of December 31, 2013

 

  Fixed-Rate Loans Variable- or Adjustable-Rate Loans
  1 Year 1-5 >5   1 Year 1-5 >5  
  or Less Years Years Total or Less Years Years Total
Real Estate $776 $16,678 $173,974 $191,428  $60,003 $214,804 $54,604 $329,411
Commercial 15,225 9,463 18,628 43,317  46,286 22,687 308 69,281
Consumer 2,444 5,258 3,035 10,737  77 0 52 129
Total $18,445 $31,399 $195,637 $245,482  $106,367 $237,491 $54,963 $398,821

 

PROVISION AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

 

The Corporation maintains an allowance for loan losses that represents management’s estimate of the losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date and recorded as a reduction of the investment in loans. Notes 1 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements provide an overview of the process management uses for evaluating and determining the allowance for loan losses.

 

While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, changes in economic conditions may necessitate revisions in future years. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Corporation to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their judgments of information available to them at the time of their examination.

 

The allowance for loan losses was $8,663,000 at December 31, 2013, up from $6,857,000 at December 31, 2012. As shown in Table X, the total of specific allowances on impaired loans totaled $2,333,000 at December 31, 2013, which was $1,710,000 higher than the total of specific allowances on impaired loans at December 31, 2012. The increase in the specific allowances on impaired loans in 2013 includes an allowance of $1,522,000 established on loans to one commercial borrower. Table X also shows the collectively determined component of the allowance for residential mortgages was $145,000 higher at December 31, 2013 than at December 31, 2012. The allowance for the residential mortgage segment was affected by the net charge-off percentage used to determine a portion of the collectively determined allowance, which was higher at December 31, 2013 than at December 31, 2012. The collectively evaluated components of the allowance for the residential and commercial segments were also affected by slight increases in qualitative factors at December 31, 2013 as compared to December 31, 2012, while lower loan balances had the effect of decreasing the collectively evaluated components of the allowance for the commercial segment.

 

The provision for loan losses is determined based on the amount required in order to maintain an appropriate allowance for loan losses in light of all factors considered. The provision for loan losses by segment for 2013, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

 

(In Thousands)      
  2013 2012 2011
Residential mortgage $559 $149 $194
Commercial 1,507 20 (625)
Consumer 24 112 25
Unallocated (43) 7 121
Total $2,047 $288 ($285)

 

The provision for loan losses was $2,047,000 in 2013, in comparison to a provision for loan losses of $288,000 in 2012 and a credit for loan losses of $285,000 in 2011. As shown in Table XII, the average provision for loan losses for the five-year period ended December 31, 2013 was $784,000. The total amount of the provision for loan losses for each period is determined based on the amount required to maintain an appropriate allowance in light of all of the factors described above.

 

29
 

 

In 2013, the provision for loan losses related to the commercial segment includes a provision of $1,522,000 from the establishment of an allowance on loans to one borrower. In 2012, the Corporation’s provision for loan losses for the commercial segment included a net provision of $464,000 related to a commercial relationship for which charge-offs totaling $760,000 were recorded, while the provision was reduced by the net decrease in the collectively evaluated portion of the allowance for loan losses as a result of a lower balance of outstanding loans. Similarly, the credit for loan losses from the commercial segment in 2011 reflected the effect of a lower balance of loans outstanding, along with reductions related to a few large commercial relationships. The provision for loan losses for the residential mortgage segment increased in 2013, mainly as a result of the increase in average net charge-offs used to estimate a portion of the collectively determined allowance.

 

Table XI presents information related to past due and impaired loans, and loans that have been modified under terms that are considered troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). At December 31, 2013, total impaired loans were $16,321,000, up from $7,429,000 at December 31, 2012. Nonaccrual loans totaled $14,934,000 at December 31, 2013, up from $7,353,000 at December 31, 2012. The increase in impaired and nonaccrual loans in 2013 resulted mainly from classification as nonperforming of two large commercial loans with outstanding balances totaling $7,599,000 at December 31, 2013. Total loans past due 90 days or more and still in accrual status increased to $3,131,000 at December 31, 2013 from $2,311,000 at December 31, 2012. Interest continues to be accrued on loans 90 days or more past due that management deems to be well secured and in the process of collection, and for which no loss is anticipated. Over the period 2009-2013, each period includes a few large commercial relationships that have required significant monitoring and workout efforts. As a result, a limited number of relationships may significantly impact the total amount of allowance required on impaired loans, and may significantly impact the amount of total charge-offs reported in any one period.

 

Management believes it has been conservative in its decisions concerning identification of impaired loans, estimates of loss, and nonaccrual status; however, the actual losses realized from these relationships could vary materially from the allowances calculated as of December 31, 2013. Management continues to closely monitor its commercial loan relationships for possible credit losses, and will adjust its estimates of loss and decisions concerning nonaccrual status, if appropriate.

 

Tables IX through XII present historical data related to the allowance for loan losses.

 

TABLE IX - ANALYSIS OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

 

(In Thousands) Years Ended December 31,
  2013 2012 2011 2010 2009
Balance, beginning of year $6,857 $7,705 $9,107 $8,265 $7,857
Charge-offs:          
Residential mortgage (95) (552) (100) (340) (146)
Commercial (459) (498) (1,189) (91) (39)
Consumer (117) (171) (157) (188) (293)
Total charge-offs (671) (1,221) (1,446) (619) (478)
Recoveries:          
Residential mortgage 24 18 3 55 8
Commercial 348 8 255 113 77
Consumer 58 59 71 102 121
Total recoveries 430 85 329 270 206
Net charge-offs (241) (1,136) (1,117) (349) (272)
Provision (credit) for loan losses 2,047 288 (285) 1,191 680
Balance, end of period $8,663 $6,857 $7,705 $9,107 $8,265
Net charge-offs as a % of average loans 0.04% 0.16% 0.16% 0.05% 0.04%

 

30
 

 

TABLE X - COMPONENTS OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

 

(In Thousands)

 

  As of December 31,
  2013 2012 2011 2010 2009
ASC 310 - Impaired loans $2,333 $623 $1,126 $2,288 $1,126
ASC 450 - Collective segments:          
Commercial 2,583 2,594 2,819 3,047 2,677
Residential mortgage 3,156 3,011 3,130 3,227 3,859
Consumer 193 188 204 232 281
Unallocated 398 441 426 313 322
Total Allowance $8,663 $6,857 $7,705 $9,107 $8,265

 

TABLE XI - PAST DUE AND IMPAIRED LOANS, NONPERFORMING ASSETS

AND TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS (TDRs)

(In Thousands)

  As of December 31,
  2013 2012 2011 2010 2009
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance $9,889 $2,710 $3,433 $5,457 $2,690
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance 6,432 4,719 4,431 3,191 3,257
Total impaired loans $16,321 $7,429 $7,864 $8,648 $5,947
           
Total loans past due 30-89 days and still accruing $8,305 $7,756 $7,898 $7,125 $9,445
           
Nonperforming assets:          
Total nonaccrual loans $14,934 $7,353 $7,197 $10,809 $9,092
Total loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing 3,131 2,311 1,267 727 31
Total nonperforming loans 18,065 9,664 8,464 11,536 9,123
Foreclosed assets held for sale (real estate) 892 879 1,235 537 873
Total nonperforming assets $18,957 $10,543 $9,699 $12,073 $9,996
           
Loans subject to troubled debt restructurings (TDRs):          
Performing $3,267 $906 $1,064 $645 $326
Nonperforming 908 1,155 2,413 0 0
Total TDRs $4,175 $2,061 $3,477 $645 $326
           
Total nonperforming loans as a % of loans 2.80% 1.41% 1.19% 1.58% 1.27%
Total nonperforming assets as a % of assets 1.53% 0.82% 0.73% 0.92% 0.76%
Allowance for loan losses as a % of total loans 1.34% 1.00% 1.09% 1.25% 1.15%
Allowance for loan losses as a % of nonperforming loans 47.95% 70.95% 91.03% 78.94% 90.60%

 

31
 

 

TABLE XII - FIVE-YEAR HISTORY OF LOAN LOSSES

(In Thousands)

  2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 Average
Average gross loans $656,495 $700,241 $714,421 $721,997 $728,748 $704,380
Year-end gross loans 644,303 683,910 708,315 730,411 721,011 697,590
Year-end allowance for loan losses 8,663 6,857 7,705 9,107 8,265 8,119
Year-end nonaccrual loans 14,934 7,353 7,197 10,809 9,092 9,877
Year-end loans 90 days or more  past due and still accruing 3,131 2,311 1,267 727 31 1,493
Net charge-offs 241 1,136 1,117 349 272 623
Provision (credit) for loan losses 2,047 288 (285) 1,191 680 784
Earnings coverage of charge-offs 77 20 21 55 (145) 14
Allowance coverage of charge-offs 36 6 7 26 30 13
Net charge-offs as a % of  provision (credit) for loan losses 11.77% 394.44% -391.93% 29.30% 40.00% 79.46%
Net charge-offs as a % of  average gross loans 0.04% 0.16% 0.16% 0.05% 0.04% 0.09%
Net income (loss) 18,594 22,705 23,368 19,055 (39,335) 8,877

 

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

 

Table XIII presents the Corporation’s significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations as of December 31, 2013 by payment date. The payment amounts represent the principal amounts of time deposits and borrowings and do not include interest.

 

TABLE XIII – CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

(In Thousands)

 

  1 Year 1-3 3-5 Over 5  
  or Less Years Years Years Total
Time deposits $147,316 $89,560 $24,161 $0 $261,037
Short-term borrowings:          
Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh 20,000 0 0 0 20,000
Customer repurchase agreements 3,385 0 0 0 3,385
Long-term borrowings:          
Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh 0 153 10,022 2,163 12,338
Repurchase agreements 0 0 61,000 0 61,000
Total $170,701 $89,713 $95,183 $2,163 $357,760

 

In addition to the amounts described in Table XIII, the Corporation has obligations related to deposits without a stated maturity with outstanding principal balances totaling $693,479,000 at December 31, 2013.

 

The Corporation’s operating lease commitments at December 31, 2013 are immaterial. The Corporation’s significant off-balance sheet arrangements consist of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Off-balance sheet arrangements are described in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements.

 

LIQUIDITY

 

Liquidity is the ability to quickly raise cash at a reasonable cost. An adequate liquidity position permits the Corporation to pay creditors, compensate for unforeseen deposit fluctuations and fund unexpected loan demand. At December 31, 2013, the Corporation maintained overnight interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and other correspondent banks totaling $22,674,000.

 

The Corporation maintains overnight borrowing facilities with several correspondent banks that provide a source of day-to-day liquidity. Also, the Corporation maintains borrowing facilities with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, secured by various mortgage loans.

 

32
 

 

The Corporation has a line of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia’s Discount Window. Management intends to use this line of credit as a contingency funding source. As collateral for the line, the Corporation has pledged available-for-sale securities with a carrying value of $27,188,000 at December 31, 2013.

 

The Corporation’s outstanding, available, and total credit facilities at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are as follows:

 

  Outstanding Available Total Credit
(In Thousands) Dec. 31, Dec. 31, Dec. 31, Dec. 31, Dec. 31, Dec. 31,
  2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012
Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh $34,335 $17,809 $304,875 $328,023 $339,210 $345,832
Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window 0 0 26,078 27,367 26,078 27,367
Other correspondent banks 0 0 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000
Total credit facilities $34,335 $17,809 $375,953 $400,390 $410,288 $418,199

 

At December 31, 2013, the Corporation’s outstanding credit facilities with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh included a short-term borrowing of $20,000,000, long-term borrowings with a total amount of $12,338,000 and a letter of credit in the amount of $1,997,000. At December 31, 2012, the Corporation’s outstanding credit facilities with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh consisted of long-term borrowings with a total amount of $15,812,000 as well as a letter of credit in the amount of $1,997,000. Additional information regarding borrowed funds is included in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.

 

Additionally, the Corporation uses repurchase agreements placed with brokers to borrow funds secured by investment assets and “RepoSweep” arrangements to borrow funds from commercial banking customers on an overnight basis. If required to raise cash in an emergency situation, the Corporation could sell available-for-sale securities to meet its obligations. At December 31, 2013, the carrying value of available-for-sale securities in excess of amounts required to meet pledging or repurchase agreement obligations was $246,560,000.

 

Management believes the Corporation is well-positioned to meet its short-term and long-term obligations.

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND CAPITAL ADEQUACY

 

The Corporation and C&N Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Details concerning regulatory capital amounts and ratios are presented in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements. As reflected in Note 18, at December 31, 2013 and 2012, the ratios of total capital to risk-weighted assets, tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and tier 1 capital to average total assets are well in excess of regulatory capital requirements.

 

Future dividend payments will depend upon maintenance of a strong financial condition, future earnings and capital and regulatory requirements. In addition, the Corporation, and C&N Bank are subject to restrictions on the amount of dividends that may be paid without approval of banking regulatory authorities. These restrictions are described in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements.

 

Management expects the Corporation and C&N Bank to maintain capital levels that exceed the regulatory standards for well-capitalized institutions for the next 12 months and for the foreseeable future. Planned capital expenditures are not expected to have a significantly detrimental effect on capital ratios. See the discussion of future changes in regulatory capital requirements in the “New Capital Rule” section below.

 

The Corporation’s total stockholders’ equity is affected by fluctuations in the fair values of available-for-sale securities. The difference between amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities, net of deferred income tax, is included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) within stockholders’ equity. The balance in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income related to unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred income tax, amounted to ($1,004,000) at December 31, 2013 and $11,568,000 at December 31, 2012. Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are excluded from earnings and directly increase or decrease stockholders’ equity. If available-for-sale securities are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, unrealized losses are recorded as a charge against earnings, and amortized cost for the affected securities is reduced. Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements provides additional information concerning management’s evaluation of available-for-sale securities for other-than-temporary impairment at December 31, 2013.

 

33
 

 

Stockholders’ equity is also affected by the underfunded or overfunded status of defined benefit pension and postretirement plans. The balance in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) related to defined benefit plans, net of deferred income tax, was $11,000 at December 31, 2013 and ($565,000) at December 31, 2012.

 

NEW CAPITAL RULE

 

In July 2013, the federal regulatory authorities issued a new capital rule based, in part, on revisions developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to the Basel capital framework (Basel III). The Corporation and C&N Bank are subject to the new rule on January 1, 2015. Generally, the new rule implements higher minimum capital requirements, revises the definition of regulatory capital components and related calculations, adds a new common equity tier 1 capital ratio, implements a new capital conservation buffer, increases the risk weighting for past due loans and provides a transition period for several aspects of the new rule.

 

34
 

 

A summarized comparison of the existing capital requirements with requirements under the new rule is as follows:

 

  Current General  
  Risk-Based  
  Capital Rule New Capital Rule
Minimum regulatory capital ratios:    
Common equity tier 1 capital/
risk-weighted assets (RWA)
N/A 4.5%
Tier 1 capital / RWA 4% 6%
Total capital / RWA 8% 8%
Tier 1 capital / Average assets    
(Leverage ratio) 4% 4%
     
Capital buffers:    
Capital conservation buffer N/A 2.5% of RWA; composed of
common equity tier 1 capital
     
Prompt correction action levels -
Common equity tier 1 capital ratio:
   
Well capitalized N/A ³6.5%
Adequately capitalized N/A ³4.5%
Undercapitalized N/A <4.5%
Significantly undercapitalized N/A <3%
     
Prompt correction action levels -
Tier 1 capital ratio:
   
Well capitalized ³6% ³8%
Adequately capitalized ³4% ³6%
Undercapitalized <4% <6%
Significantly undercapitalized <3% <4%
     
Prompt correction action levels -
Total capital ratio:
   
Well capitalized ³10% ³10%
Adequately capitalized ³8% ³8%
Undercapitalized <8% <8%
Significantly undercapitalized <6% <6%
     
Prompt correction action levels -
Leverage ratio:
   
Well capitalized ³5% ³5%
Adequately capitalized ³4% ³4%
Undercapitalized <4% <4%
Significantly undercapitalized <3% <3%
     
Prompt correction action levels -
Critically undercapitalized:
   
Tangible equity to total assets 2% 2%

 

35
 

 

The new capital rule provides that, in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions, including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers, a banking organization must hold a capital conservation buffer composed of common equity tier 1 capital above its minimum risk-based capital requirements. The buffer is measured relative to risk-weighted assets. Phase-in of the capital conservation buffer requirements will begin January 1, 2016. The transition schedule for new ratios, including the capital conservation buffer, is as follows:

 

  As of January 1:      
  2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Minimum common equity tier 1 capital ratio 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5% 4.5%
Common equity tier 1 capital conservation buffer N/A 0.625% 1.25% 1.875% 2.5%
Minimum common equity tier 1 capital ratio plus          
capital conservation buffer 4.5% 5.125% 5.75% 6.375% 7.0%
Phase-in of most deductions from common equity          
tier 1 capital 40% 60% 80% 100% 100%
Minimum tier 1 capital ratio 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0%
Minimum tier 1 capital ratio plus capital          
conservation buffer N/A 6.625% 7.25% 7.875% 8.5%
Minimum total capital ratio 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0%
Minimum total capital ratio plus capital          
conservation buffer N/A 8.625% 9.25% 9.875% 10.5%

 

As fully phased in, a banking organization with a buffer greater than 2.5% would not be subject to additional limits on dividend payments or discretionary bonus payments; however, a banking organization with a buffer less than 2.5% would be subject to increasingly stringent limitations as the buffer approaches zero. The new rule also prohibits a banking organization from making dividend payments or discretionary bonus payments if its eligible retained income is negative in that quarter and its capital conservation buffer ratio was less than 2.5% as of the beginning of that quarter. Eligible net income is defined as net income for the four calendar quarters preceding the current calendar quarter, net of any distributions and associated tax effects not already reflected in net income. A summary of payout restrictions based on the capital conservation buffer is as follows:

Capital Conservation Buffer Maximum Payout
(as a % of risk-weighted assets) (as a % of eligible retained income)
Greater than 2.5% No payout limitation applies
≤2.5% and >1.875% 60%
≤1.875% and >1.25% 40%
≤1.25% and >0.625% 20%
≤0.625% 0%

 

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

Comprehensive Income is the total of (1) net income, and (2) all other changes in equity from non-stockholder sources, which are referred to as Other Comprehensive Income. Changes in the components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) are included in Other Comprehensive Income, and for the Corporation, consist of changes in unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities and changes in underfunded defined benefit plans.

 

Comprehensive Income totaled $6,598,000 in 2013 as compared to $23,548,000 in 2012 and $35,129,000 in 2011. In 2013, Comprehensive Income included: (1) Net Income of $18,594,000 in 2013, which was $4,111,000 lower than in 2012 and $4,774,000 lower than in 2011; (2) Other Comprehensive Loss from unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred income tax, of ($12,572,000) in 2013 as compared to Other Comprehensive Income $777,000 in 2012 and $12,142,000 in 2011; and (3) Other Comprehensive Income from defined benefit plans of $576,000 in 2013 as compared to Other Comprehensive Income of $66,000 in 2012 and Other Comprehensive Loss of $381,000 in 2011.

 

36
 

 

Fluctuations in the amounts of unrealized gains and losses on the Corporation’s available-for-sale securities in 2011 through 2013 have resulted mainly from changes in interest rates. Increases in intermediate-term and long-term interest rates in 2013 led to a decrease in the aggregate fair value of securities in 2013, after fairly limited changes in rates in 2012 and a decrease in rates in 2011 led to an aggregate increase in fair value of securities in 2011.

 

INFLATION

 

The Corporation is significantly affected by the Federal Reserve Board’s efforts to control inflation through changes in short-term interest rates. Beginning in September 2007, in response to concerns about weakness in the U.S. economy, the Federal Reserve lowered the fed funds target rate numerous times; in December 2008, it established a target range of 0% to 0.25%, which it has maintained through 2013. Also, the Federal Reserve has injected massive amounts of liquidity into the nation’s monetary system through a variety of programs. The Federal Reserve has purchased large amounts of securities in an effort to keep interest rates low and stimulate economic growth. Although the Federal Reserve reduced the amount of securities it purchased beginning in late 2013, highly accommodative monetary policy in the form of low short-term interest rates is expected for the foreseeable future.

 

Despite the current low short-term rate environment, liquidity injections, and commodity price increases, inflation statistics indicate that the overall rate of inflation is unlikely to significantly affect the Corporation’s operations within the near future. Although management cannot predict future changes in the rates of inflation, management monitors the impact of economic trends, including any indicators of inflationary pressures, in managing interest rate and other financial risks.

 

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

 

See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of recent accounting pronouncements and their recent or potential future effects on the Corporation’s financial statements.

 

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

MARKET RISK

 

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices of the Corporation’s financial instruments. In addition to the effects of interest rates, the market prices of the Corporation’s debt securities within the available-for-sale securities portfolio are affected by fluctuations in the risk premiums (amounts of spread over risk-free rates) demanded by investors.

 

Management cannot control changes in market prices of securities based on fluctuations in the risk premiums demanded by investors, nor can management control the volume of deferrals or defaults by the issuers of debt securities owned by the Corporation. However, management attempts to limit the risk that economic conditions would force the Corporation to sell securities for realized losses by maintaining a strong capital position (discussed in the “Stockholders’ Equity and Capital Adequacy” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis) and ample sources of liquidity (discussed in the “Liquidity” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis).

 

The Corporation’s two major categories of market risk are interest rate risk and equity securities risk, which are discussed in the following sections.

 

INTEREST RATE RISK

 

Business risk arising from changes in interest rates is an inherent factor in operating a bank. The Corporation’s assets are predominantly long-term, fixed-rate loans and debt securities. Funding for these assets comes principally from shorter-term deposits and borrowed funds. Accordingly, there is an inherent risk of lower future earnings or decline in fair value of the Corporation’s financial instruments when interest rates change.

 

The Corporation uses a simulation model to calculate the potential effects of interest rate fluctuations on net interest income and the market value of portfolio equity. For purposes of these calculations, the market value of portfolio equity includes the fair values of financial instruments, such as securities, loans, deposits and borrowed funds, and the book values of nonfinancial assets and liabilities, such as premises and equipment and accrued expenses. The model measures and projects potential changes in net interest income, and calculates the discounted present value of anticipated cash flows of financial instruments, assuming an immediate increase or decrease in interest rates. Management ordinarily runs a variety of scenarios within a range of plus or minus 100-400 basis points of current rates.

 

37
 

 

The model makes estimates, at each level of interest rate change, regarding cash flows from principal repayments on loans and mortgage-backed securities and call activity on other investment securities. Actual results could vary significantly from these estimates, which could result in significant differences in the calculations of projected changes in net interest income and market value of portfolio equity. Also, the model does not make estimates related to changes in the composition of the deposit portfolio that could occur due to rate competition, and the table does not necessarily reflect changes that management would make to realign the portfolio as a result of changes in interest rates.

 

The Corporation’s Board of Directors has established policy guidelines for acceptable levels of interest rate risk, based on an immediate increase or decrease in interest rates. The policy limits acceptable fluctuations in net interest income from the baseline (flat rates) one-year scenario and variances in the market value of portfolio equity from the baseline values based on current rates.

 

Table XIV, which follows this discussion, is based on the results of calculations performed using the simulation model as of December 31, 2013 and October 31, 2012. The table shows that as of the respective dates, the changes in net interest income and changes in market value were within the policy limits in all scenarios.

 

38
 

TABLE XIV - THE EFFECT OF HYPOTHETICAL CHANGES IN INTEREST RATES

 

December 31, 2013 Data

(In Thousands)   Period Ending December 31, 2014  
           
Basis Point Interest Interest Net Interest NII NII
Change in Rates Income Expense Income (NII)  % Change Risk Limit
+400 $53,993 $23,975 $30,018 -24.4% 25.0%
+300 51,748 18,975 32,773 -17.4% 20.0%
+200 49,496 14,091 35,405 -10.8% 15.0%
+100 47,146 9,552 37,594 -5.3% 10.0%
0 44,821 5,123 39,698 0.0% 0.0%
-100 42,432 4,897 37,535 -5.4% 10.0%
-200 40,747 4,895 35,852 -9.7% 15.0%
-300 40,059 4,895 35,164 -11.4% 20.0%
-400 39,968 4,895 35,073 -11.7% 25.0%
           
   Market Value of Portfolio Equity at December 31, 2013  
           
  Present Present Present    
Basis Point Value Value Value    
Change in Rates Equity  % Change Risk Limit    
+400 $161,652 -28.5% 50.0%    
+300 175,176 -22.6% 45.0%    
+200 192,513 -14.9% 35.0%    
+100 209,428 -7.4% 25.0%    
0 226,204 0.0% 0.0%    
-100 230,189 1.8% 25.0%    
-200 233,902 3.4% 35.0%    
-300 250,451 10.7% 45.0%    
-400 282,994 25.1% 50.0%    
           
October 31, 2012 Data          
(In Thousands)   Period Ending October 31, 2013  
           
Basis Point Interest Interest Net Interest NII NII
Change in Rates Income Expense Income (NII)  % Change Risk Limit
+400 $60,813 $26,050 $34,763 -18.9% 25.0%
+300 58,329 20,789 37,540 -12.4% 20.0%
+200 55,398 16,004 39,394 -8.1% 15.0%
+100 52,592 11,338 41,254 -3.7% 10.0%
0 49,534 6,673 42,861 0.0% 0.0%
-100 46,881 6,236 40,645 -5.2% 10.0%
-200 46,178 6,233 39,945 -6.8% 15.0%
-300 45,925 6,233 39,692 -7.4% 20.0%
-400 45,800 6,233 39,567 -7.7% 25.0%
           
   Market Value of Portfolio Equity at October 31, 2012  
           
  Present Present Present    
Basis Point Value Value Value    
Change in Rates Equity  % Change Risk Limit    
+400 $165,826 -21.7% 50.0%    
+300 179,904 -15.1% 45.0%    
+200 193,117 -8.8% 35.0%    
+100 204,290 -3.6% 25.0%    
0 211,846 0.0% 0.0%    
-100 207,561 -2.0% 25.0%    
-200 230,184 8.7% 35.0%    
-300 268,229 26.6% 45.0%    

 

39
 

 

EQUITY SECURITIES RISK

 

The Corporation’s equity securities portfolio consists of investments in stocks of banks and bank holding companies. Investments in bank stocks are subject to risk factors that affect the banking industry in general, including credit risk, competition from non-bank entities, interest rate risk and other factors, which could result in a decline in market prices. Also, losses could occur in individual stocks held by the Corporation because of specific circumstances related to each bank. As discussed further in Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation recognized other-than-temporary impairment losses related to bank stocks of $25,000 in the first quarter 2013 and $67,000 in the first quarter 2012.

 

Equity securities held as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are presented in Table XV. Table XV presents quantitative data concerning the effects of a decline in fair value of the Corporation’s equity securities of 10% or 20%. The data in Table XV does not reflect the effects of any appreciation in value that may occur, nor does it present the Corporation’s maximum exposure to loss on equity securities, which would be 100% of their fair value as of December 31, 2013.

 

TABLE XV - EQUITY SECURITIES RISK

(In Thousands)

 

  Dec. 31, Dec. 31,
  2013 2012
Cost $6,038 $5,912
Fair Value 8,924 8,373
Hypothetical 10% Decline In Market Value (892) (837)
Hypothetical 20% Decline In Market Value (1,785) (1,675)

 

40
 

 

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA    
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS    
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data) December 31, December 31,
  2013 2012
ASSETS    
Cash and due from banks:    
Noninterest-bearing $15,917 $21,356
Interest-bearing 28,702 38,480
Total cash and due from banks 44,619 59,836
Available-for-sale securities, at fair value 482,658 472,577
Loans held for sale 54 2,545
     
Loans receivable 644,303 683,910
Allowance for loan losses (8,663) (6,857)
Loans, net 635,640 677,053
Bank-owned life insurance 21,743 21,344
Accrued interest receivable 4,146 4,281
Bank premises and equipment, net 17,430 18,707
Foreclosed assets held for sale 892 879
Deferred tax asset, net 6,344 1,725
Intangible asset - Core deposit intangibles 87 138
Intangible asset - Goodwill 11,942 11,942
Other assets 12,140 15,880
TOTAL ASSETS $1,237,695 $1,286,907
     
LIABILITIES    
Deposits:    
Noninterest-bearing $191,245 $189,941
Interest-bearing 763,271 816,165
Total deposits 954,516 1,006,106
Short-term borrowings 23,385 5,567
Long-term borrowings 73,338 83,812
Accrued interest and other liabilities 6,984 8,636
TOTAL LIABILITIES 1,058,223 1,104,121
     
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY    
Preferred stock, $1,000 par value; authorized 30,000 shares; $1,000 liquidation preference    
per share; no shares issued at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 0 0
Common stock, par value $1.00 per share; authorized 20,000,000 shares in 2013 and    
2012; issued 12,596,540 at December 31, 2013 and 12,525,411 at December 31, 2012 12,596 12,525
Paid-in capital 70,105 68,622
Retained earnings 101,216 94,839
Treasury stock, at cost; 206,477 shares at December 31, 2013    
and 251,376 shares at December 31, 2012 (3,452) (4,203)
Sub-total 180,465 171,783
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income:    
Unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities (1,004) 11,568
Defined benefit plans gain (loss) 11 (565)
Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income (993) 11,003
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 179,472 182,786
TOTAL LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $1,237,695 $1,286,907

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

41
 

 

Consolidated Statements of Income Years Ended December 31,
(In Thousands Except Per Share Data) 2013 2012 2011
INTEREST INCOME      
Interest and fees on loans $35,484 $40,453 $43,178
Interest on balances with depository institutions 105 114 73
Interest on loans to political subdivisions 1,381 1,539 1,499
Interest on mortgages held for sale 54 107 53
Income from available-for-sale securities:      
Taxable 6,810 9,029 11,036
Tax-exempt 4,785 5,085 5,156
Dividends 295 305 261
Total interest and dividend income 48,914 56,632 61,256
INTEREST EXPENSE      
Interest on deposits 2,703 4,807 8,112
Interest on short-term borrowings 9 10 23
Interest on long-term borrowings 3,053 4,214 5,421
Total interest expense 5,765 9,031 13,556
Net interest income 43,149 47,601 47,700
Provision (credit) for loan losses 2,047 288 (285)
Net interest income after provision (credit) for loan losses 41,102 47,313 47,985
OTHER INCOME      
Service charges on deposit accounts 4,966 5,036 4,773
Service charges and fees 877 929 849
Trust and financial management revenue 4,087 3,847 3,472
Interchange revenue from debit card transactions 1,941 1,938 1,922
Net gains from sale of loans 2,191 1,925 1,107
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance 399 455 509
Insurance commissions, fees and premiums 170 221 257
Impairment loss on limited partnership investment 0 0 (948)
Other operating income 1,820 2,032 1,956
Sub-total 16,451 16,383 13,897
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses on available-for-sale securities (25) (67) 0
Portion of (gain) recognized in other comprehensive loss (before taxes) 0 0 0
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings (25) (67) 0
Realized gains on available-for-sale securities, net 1,743 2,749 2,216
Net realized gains recognized in earnings on available-for-sale securities 1,718 2,682 2,216
Total other income 18,169 19,065 16,113
OTHER EXPENSES      
Salaries and wages 14,206 14,370 13,866
Pensions and other employee benefits 4,150 4,497 4,407
Occupancy expense, net 2,473 2,476 2,638
Furniture and equipment expense 1,948 1,887 1,932
FDIC Assessments 604 633 832
Pennsylvania shares tax 1,402 1,312 1,306
Professional fees 1,534 486 455
Automated teller machine and interchange expense 1,020 1,136 1,026
Software subscriptions 836 890 703
Loss on prepayment of debt 1,023 2,333 0
Other operating expense 5,298 5,227 4,851
Total other expenses 34,494 35,247 32,016
Income before income tax provision 24,777 31,131 32,082
Income tax provision 6,183 8,426 8,714
NET INCOME $18,594 $22,705 $23,368
NET INCOME PER SHARE - BASIC $1.51 $1.86 $1.92
NET INCOME PER SHARE - DILUTED $1.50 $1.85 $1.92

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

42
 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME    
(In Thousands) Years Ended December 31,
  2013 2012 2011
Net income $18,594 $22,705 $23,368
       
Unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities:      
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities (17,623) 4,128 20,611
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in income (1,718) (2,682) (2,216)
Other comprehensive (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities (19,341) 1,446 18,395
       
Unfunded pension and postretirement obligations:      
Changes from plan amendments and actuarial gains and losses included in      
accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss) 885 8 (626)
Amortization of net transition obligation, prior service cost and net      
actuarial loss included in net periodic benefit cost 2 77 55
Other comprehensive gain (loss) on unfunded retirement obligations 887 85 (571)
       
Other comprehensive (loss) income before income tax (18,454) 1,531 17,824
Income tax related to other comprehensive loss (income) 6,458 (688) (6,063)
       
Net other comprehensive (loss) income (11,996) 843 11,761
       
Comprehensive income $6,598 $23,548 $35,129

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

43
 

 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in

Stockholders' Equity

(In Thousands Except Share and Per

Share Data)           Accumulated    
            Other    
            Comprehensive    
  Common Treasury Common Paid-in Retained Income Treasury  
  Shares Shares Stock Capital Earnings (Loss) Stock Total
Balance, January 1, 2011 12,408,212 254,614 $12,408 $66,648 $65,920 ($1,601) ($4,431) $138,944
Net income         23,368     23,368
Other comprehensive income, net           11,761   11,761
Cash dividends declared on common                
stock, $.58 per share         (7,052)     (7,052)
Treasury stock purchased   70,849         (1,022) (1,022)
Shares issued for dividend reinvestment plan 52,708   53 772       825
Shares issued from treasury related to                
Exercise of stock options   (4,856)   (11)     82 71
Restricted stock granted   (15,622)   (272)     272 0
Forfeiture of restricted stock   406   7     (7) 0
Stock-based compensation expense       423       423
Tax effect of stock option exercises       1       1
Tax benefit from employee benefit plan         66     66
Balance, December 31, 2011 12,460,920 305,391 12,461 67,568 82,302 10,160 (5,106) 167,385
Net income         22,705     22,705
Other comprehensive income, net           843   843
Cash dividends declared on common                
stock, $.84 per share         (10,272)     (10,272)
Shares issued for dividend reinvestment plan 64,491   64 1,147       1,211
Shares issued from treasury related to                
exercise of stock options   (15,023)   (22)     251 229
Restricted stock granted   (42,552)   (711)     711 0
Forfeiture of restricted stock   3,560   59     (59) 0
Stock-based compensation expense       567       567
Tax effect of stock option exercises       14       14
Tax benefit from employee benefit plan         104     104
Balance, December 31, 2012 12,525,411 251,376 12,525 68,622 94,839 11,003 (4,203) 182,786
Net income         18,594     18,594
Other comprehensive loss, net           (11,996)   (11,996)
Cash dividends declared on common                
stock, $1.00 per share         (12,343)     (12,343)
Shares issued for dividend reinvestment plan 71,129   71 1,356       1,427
Shares issued from treasury related to                
exercise of stock options   (10,656)   5     179 184
Restricted stock granted   (37,886)   (633)     633 0
Forfeiture of restricted stock   3,643   61     (61) 0
Stock-based compensation expense       696       696
Tax effect of stock option exercises       (2)       (2)
Tax benefit from employee benefit plan         126     126
Balance, December 31, 2013 12,596,540 206,477 $12,596 $70,105 $101,216 ($993) ($3,452) $179,472

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

44
 

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Years Ended December 31,
(In Thousands) 2013 2012 2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:      
Net income $18,594 $22,705 $23,368
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:      
Provision (credit) for loan losses 2,047 288 (285)
Realized gains on available-for-sale securities, net (1,718) (2,682) (2,216)
Loss on prepayment of debt 1,023 2,333 0
Loss (gain) on disposition of premises and equipment 16 (270) (324)
Loss (gain) on sale of foreclosed assets, net 71 66 (41)
Depreciation expense 2,020 1,939 2,077
Accretion and amortization on securities, net 1,836 1,581 1,317
Accretion and amortization on loans, deposits and borrowings, net (32) (49) (35)
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights 155 97 68
Impairment loss on limited partnership interest 0 0 948
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance (399) (455) (509)
Stock-based compensation 696 567 423
Amortization of core deposit intangibles 51 74 114
Deferred income taxes 1,839 3,760 3,818
Gains on sales of mortgage loans, net (2,191) (1,925) (1,107)
Origination of mortgage loans for sale (58,427) (62,829) (26,610)
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans 62,436 62,821 31,786
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable and other assets 3,234 (1,043) 3,580
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities (679) 674 1,092
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 30,572 27,652 37,464
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:      
Proceeds from maturities of certificates of deposit 480 0 0
Purchase of certificates of deposit (1,688) (1,060) (3,760)
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities 25,500 24,228 25,471
Proceeds from calls and maturities of available-for-sale securities 97,123 114,247 108,138
Purchase of available-for-sale securities (152,163) (126,820) (152,044)
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh stock 2,680 1,931 1,513
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh stock (1,624) 0 0
Net decrease in loans 39,059 22,320 19,264
Proceeds from bank-owned life insurance 0 0 1,442
Purchase of premises and equipment (801) (1,622) (998)
Proceeds from disposition of premises and equipment 42 456 3,060
Purchase of investment in limited liability entity (147) (538) (397)
Return of principal on limited liability entity investments 164 114 116
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets 255 1,380 1,112
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities 8,880 34,636 2,917
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:      
Net (decrease) increase in deposits (51,590) (12,106) 13,839
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings 17,818 617 (13,463)
Repayments of long-term borrowings (11,497) (43,884) (23,132)
Purchase of treasury stock 0 0 (1,022)
Sale of treasury stock 184 229 71
Tax benefit from compensation plans 124 118 67
Common dividends paid (10,916) (9,061) (6,227)
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities (55,877) (64,087) (29,867)
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (16,425) (1,799) 10,514
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR 55,016 56,815 46,301
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR $38,591 $55,016 $56,815
       
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:      
Assets acquired through foreclosure of real estate loans $339 $1,004 $1,769
Interest paid $5,782 $9,246 $13,609
Income taxes paid $4,213 $4,250 $3,616

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

45
 

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Citizens & Northern Corporation and its subsidiaries, Citizens & Northern Bank (“C&N Bank”), Bucktail Life Insurance Company and Citizens & Northern Investment Corporation (collectively, “Corporation”), as well as C&N Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, C&N Financial Services Corporation. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

NATURE OF OPERATIONS - The Corporation is primarily engaged in providing a full range of banking and mortgage services to individual and corporate customers in North Central Pennsylvania and Southern New York State. Lending products include mortgage loans, commercial loans and consumer loans, as well as specialized instruments such as commercial letters-of-credit. Deposit products include various types of checking accounts, passbook and statement savings, money market accounts, interest checking accounts, Individual Retirement Accounts and certificates of deposit. The Corporation also offers non-insured “RepoSweep” accounts.

 

The Corporation provides Trust and Financial Management services, including administration of trusts and estates, retirement plans, and other employee benefit plans, and investment management services. The Corporation offers a variety of personal and commercial insurance products through C&N Financial Services Corporation. C&N Financial Services Corporation also offers mutual funds, annuities, educational savings accounts and other investment products through registered agents. Management has determined that the Corporation has one reportable segment, “Community Banking.” All of the Corporation’s activities are interrelated, and each activity is dependent and assessed based on how each of the activities of the Corporation supports the others.

 

The Corporation is subject to competition from other financial institutions. It is also subject to regulation by certain federal and state agencies and undergoes periodic examination by those regulatory authorities. As a consequence, the Corporation’s business is particularly susceptible to being affected by future federal and state legislation and regulations.

 

USE OF ESTIMATES - The financial information is presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and general practice for financial institutions in the United States of America. In preparing financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements. In addition, these estimates and assumptions affect revenues and expenses in the financial statements and as such, actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to change include: (1) the allowance for loan losses, (2) fair values of debt securities based on estimates from independent valuation services or from brokers, (3) fair values of debt securities based on unobservable inputs, as determined using management’s estimates of cash flows and applicable discount rates,(4) assessment of impaired securities to determine whether or not the securities are other-than-temporarily impaired, (5) valuation of deferred tax assets and (6) valuation of obligations from defined benefit plans.

 

INVESTMENT SECURITIES - Investment securities are accounted for as follows:

 

Available-for-sale securities - includes debt securities not classified as held-to-maturity or trading, and unrestricted equity securities. Such securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported separately through accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on available-for-sale securities are recorded using the level yield method over the remaining contractual life of the securities, adjusted for actual prepayments. Realized gains and losses on sales of available-for-sale securities are computed on the basis of specific identification of the adjusted cost of each security. Securities within the available-for-sale portfolio may be used as part of the Corporation’s asset and liability management strategy and may be sold in response to changes in interest rate risk, prepayment risk or other factors.

 

Other-than-temporary impairment - Declines in the fair value of available-for-sale securities that are deemed to be other-than-temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) the intent and ability of the Corporation to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value, and (4) whether the Corporation intends to sell the security or if it is more likely than not that the Corporation will be required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis. The credit-related impairment is recognized in earnings and is the difference between a security’s amortized cost basis and the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the security’s effective interest rate. For debt securities classified as held-to-maturity, if any, the amount of noncredit-related impairment is recognized in other comprehensive income and accreted over the remaining life of the debt security as an increase in the carrying value of the security. In addition, the risk of future other-than-temporary impairment may be influenced by additional bank failures, prolonged recession in the U.S. economy, changes to real estate values, interest deferrals and whether the federal government provides assistance to financial institutions.

 

46
 

 

Restricted equity securities - Restricted equity securities consist primarily of Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh stock, and are carried at cost and evaluated for impairment. Holdings of restricted equity securities are included in Other Assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and dividends received on restricted securities are included in Other Income in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

 

LOANS HELD FOR SALE - Mortgage loans held for sale are reported at the lower of cost or market, determined in the aggregate.

 

LOANS RECEIVABLE - Loans receivable which management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are stated at unpaid principal balances, less the allowance for loan losses and net deferred loan fees. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination and commitment fees, as well as certain direct origination costs, are deferred and amortized as a yield adjustment over the lives of the related loans using the interest method.

 

The loans receivable portfolio is segmented into residential mortgage, commercial and consumer loans. The residential mortgage segment includes the following classes: first and junior lien residential mortgages, home equity lines of credit and residential construction loans. The most significant classes of commercial loans are commercial loans secured by real estate, non-real estate secured commercial and industrial loans, loans to political subdivisions, commercial construction, and loans secured by farmland.

 

Loans are placed on nonaccrual status for all classes of loans when, in the opinion of management, collection of interest is doubtful. Any unpaid interest previously accrued on those loans is reversed from income. Interest income is not recognized on specific impaired loans unless the likelihood of further loss is remote. Interest payments received on loans for which the risk of further loss is greater than remote are applied as a reduction of the loan principal balance. Interest income on other nonaccrual loans is recognized only to the extent of interest payments received. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time (generally six months) and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt. The past due status of all classes of loans receivable is determined based on contractual due dates for loan payments. Also, the amortization of deferred loan fees is discontinued when a loan is placed on nonaccrual status.

 

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES - The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date and is recorded as a reduction to loans. The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses, and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. All, or part, of the principal balance of loans receivable are charged off to the allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of the principal balance is highly unlikely. Non-residential consumer loans are generally charged off no later than when they are 120 days past due on a contractual basis, or earlier in the event of bankruptcy or if there is an amount deemed uncollectible.

 

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that can be reasonably anticipated. Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance. The allowance is based on the Corporation’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Corporation to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their judgments of information available to them at the time of their examination. In the process of evaluating the loan portfolio, management also considers the Corporation’s exposure to losses from unfunded loan commitments. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, management determined that no allowance for credit losses related to unfunded loan commitments was required.

 

The allowance consists primarily of two major components – (1) a specific component based on a detailed assessment of certain larger loan relationships, mainly commercial purpose, determined on a loan-by-loan basis; and (2) a general component for the remainder of the portfolio based on a collective evaluation of pools of loans with similar risk characteristics. The general component is assigned to each pool of loans based on both historical net charge-off experience, and an evaluation of certain qualitative factors. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the above methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

 

The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired based on a detailed assessment of certain larger loan relationships evaluated by a management committee referred to as the Watch List Committee. Specific loan relationships are identified for evaluation based on the related credit risk rating. For individual loans classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the collateral value less estimated selling costs, present value of discounted cash flows or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan.

 

47
 

 

The general component covers pools of loans by loan class including commercial loans not considered individually impaired, as well as smaller balance homogeneous classes of loans, such as residential real estate, home equity lines of credit and other consumer loans. Accordingly, the Corporation generally does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are subject to a restructuring agreement. The pools of loans for each loan segment are evaluated for loss exposure based upon average historical net charge-off rates (currently thirty-six months), adjusted for qualitative factors. Qualitative risk factors (described in the following paragraph) are evaluated for the impact on each of the three distinct segments (residential mortgage, commercial and consumer) within the loan portfolio. Each qualitative factor is assigned a value to reflect improving, stable or declining conditions based on management’s judgment using relevant information available at the time of the evaluation. Any adjustments to the factors are supported by a narrative documentation of changes in conditions accompanying the allowance for loan loss calculation.

 

The qualitative factors used in the general component calculations are designed to address credit risk characteristics associated with each segment. The Corporation’s credit risk associated with all of the segments is significantly impacted by these factors, which include economic conditions within its market area, the Corporation’s lending policies, changes or trends in the portfolio, risk profile, competition, regulatory requirements and other factors. Further, the residential mortgage segment is significantly affected by the values of residential real estate that provide collateral for the loans. The majority of the Corporation’s commercial segment loans (approximately 71% at December 31, 2013) are secured by real estate, and accordingly, the Corporation’s risk for the commercial segment is significantly affected by commercial real estate values. The consumer segment includes a wide mix of loans for different purposes, primarily secured loans, including loans secured by motor vehicles, manufactured housing and other types of collateral.

 

Loans are classified as impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial loans by the fair value of the collateral (if the loan is collateral dependent), by future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective rate or by the loan’s observable market price.

 

For commercial loans secured by real estate, estimated fair values are determined primarily through third-party appraisals. When a real estate secured loan becomes impaired, a decision is made regarding whether an updated certified appraisal of the real estate is necessary. This decision is based on various considerations, including the age of the most recent appraisal, the loan-to-value ratio based on the original appraisal and the condition of the property. Appraised values are discounted to arrive at the estimated selling price of the collateral, which is considered to be the estimated fair value. The discounts also include estimated costs to sell the property.

 

For commercial and industrial loans secured by non-real estate collateral, such as accounts receivable, inventory and equipment, estimated fair values are determined based on the borrower’s financial statements, inventory reports, accounts receivable agings or equipment appraisals or invoices. Indications of value from these sources are generally discounted based on the age of the financial information or the quality of the assets.

 

Loans whose terms are modified are classified as troubled debt restructurings if the Corporation grants such borrowers concessions and it is deemed that those borrowers are experiencing financial difficulty. Concessions granted under a troubled debt restructuring generally involve an extension of a loan’s stated maturity date or a temporary reduction in interest rate. Non-accrual troubled debt restructurings are restored to accrual status if principal and interest payments, under the modified terms, are current for six consecutive months after modification. Loans classified as troubled debt restructurings are designated as impaired.

 

BANK PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT - Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Repair and maintenance expenditures which extend the useful lives of assets are capitalized, and other repair and maintenance expenditures are expensed as incurred. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method.

 

IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS - The Corporation reviews long-lived assets, such as premises and equipment and intangibles, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. These changes in circumstances may include a significant decrease in the market value of an asset or the manner in which an asset is used. If there is an indication the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable, future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from use of the asset are estimated. If the sum of the expected cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, a loss is recognized for the difference between the carrying value and fair market value of the asset.

 

48
 

 

 

INTEREST COSTS - The Corporation capitalizes interest as a component of the cost of premises and equipment constructed or acquired for its own use. The amount of capitalized interest in 2013, 2012, and 2011 was not significant.

 

FORECLOSED ASSETS HELD FOR SALE - Foreclosed assets held for sale consist of real estate acquired by foreclosure and are initially recorded at fair value, less estimated selling costs.

 

GOODWILL AND CORE DEPOSIT INTANGIBLE ASSETS - Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of acquisitions over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment, or more often if events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. Core deposit intangibles are being amortized over periods of time that represent the expected lives using a method of amortization that reflects the pattern of economic benefit. Core deposit intangibles are subject to impairment testing whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate their carrying amounts may not be recoverable.

 

SERVICING RIGHTS - The estimated fair value of servicing rights related to mortgage loans sold and serviced by the Corporation is recorded as an asset upon the sale of such loans. The valuation of servicing rights is adjusted quarterly, with changes in fair value included in Other Operating Income in the consolidated statements of operations. Significant inputs to the valuation include expected net servicing income to be received, the expected life of the underlying loans and the discount rate. The servicing rights asset is included in Other Assets in the consolidated balance sheet, with a balance equal to fair value of $1,123,000 at December 31, 2013 and $605,000 at December 31, 2012.

 

INCOME TAXES - Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amount of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases given the provisions of the enacted tax laws. Deferred tax assets are reduced, if necessary, by the amount of such benefits that are not expected to be realized based upon available evidence. Tax benefits from investments in limited partnerships that have qualified for federal low-income tax credits are recognized as a reduction in the provision for income tax over the term of the investment using the effective yield method. The Corporation includes income tax penalties in the provision for income tax. The Corporation has no accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits.

 

STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS - The Corporation’s stock-based compensation policy applies to all forms of stock-based compensation including stock options and restricted stock units. All stock-based compensation is accounted for under the fair value method as required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The expense associated with stock-based compensation is recognized over the vesting period of each individual arrangement.

 

The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model. The fair value of restricted stock is based on the current market price on the date of grant.

 

OFF-BALANCE SHEET FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation has entered into off-balance sheet financial instruments consisting of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Such financial instruments are recorded in the financial statements when they become payable.

 

CASH FLOWS - The Corporation utilizes the net reporting of cash receipts and cash payments for certain deposit and lending activities. Cash equivalents include federal funds sold and all cash and amounts due from depository institutions and interest-bearing deposits in other banks with original maturities of three months or less.

 

TRUST ASSETS AND INCOME - Assets held by the Corporation in a fiduciary or agency capacity for its customers are not included in the financial statements since such items are not assets of the Corporation. Trust income is recorded on a cash basis, which is not materially different from the accrual basis.

 

2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:

 

The FASB issues Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs) to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC). This section provides a summary description of recent ASUs that have significant implications (elected or required) within the consolidated financial statements, or that management expects may have a significant impact on financial statements issued in the near future.

 

49
 

 

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-01, Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The amendments in this standard clarify that the scope of ASU 2011-11 applies to (among other types of instruments) repurchase agreements that are either offset or subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The amendments in ASU 2011-11 require an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on the entity’s financial position. The Corporation has two types of repurchase agreements that have been recognized as borrowings in the consolidated financial statements: (1) overnight repurchase agreements with customers, and (2) repurchase agreements with a broker-dealer. The Corporation does not offset assets and liabilities related to either of these types of repurchase agreement. The overnight repurchase agreements with customers are not subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement, and accordingly, the disclosure requirements of ASU 2011-11 do not apply. As disclosed in Note 12 to these consolidated financial statements, the Master Repurchase Agreement between the Corporation and the broker-dealer provides that the Agreement constitutes a “netting contract,” as defined; however, the Corporation and the broker-dealer have no other obligations to one another and therefore, no netting has occurred.

 

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The amendments in this standard require an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, this standard requires an entity to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required by U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity will be required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. As required, the Corporation has implemented the amendments in this ASU prospectively in Note 3 to these consolidated financial statements.

 

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. The amendments in this standard clarify that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows. To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. For the Corporation, the amendments in this Update are effective beginning in the first quarter 2014. The Corporation will be affected by these amendments if unrecognized tax benefits arise in future periods.

 

In December 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-12, Definition of a Public Business Entity. The amendment in this Update provides a single definition of public business entity for use in future financial accounting and reporting guidance. The amendment does not affect existing requirements and does not have an effective date. The amendment specifies the following: (1) an entity that is required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to file or furnish financial statements with the SEC, or does file or furnish financial statements with the SEC, is considered a public entity, (2) a consolidated subsidiary of a public company is not considered a public business entity for purposes of its standalone financial statements other than those included in an SEC filing by its parent or by other registrants or those that are issuers and are required to file or furnish financial statements with the SEC, and (3) a business entity that has securities that are not subject to contractual restrictions on transfer and that is by law, contract or regulation required to prepare U.S. GAAP financial statements (including footnotes) and make them publicly available on a periodic basis is considered a public business entity. Based on this definition, Citizens & Northern Corporation is considered a public business entity, while the individual subsidiaries are not considered to be public business entities for purposes of their standalone financial statements.

 

In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-01, Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects. This Update provides guidance on accounting for investments in flow-through limited liability entities that qualify for the federal low-income housing tax credit. Currently, under U.S. GAAP, a reporting entity that invests in a qualified affordable housing project may elect to account for that investment using the effective yield method if certain conditions are met, or alternatively, the investment would be accounted for under either the equity method or the cost method. Generally, investors in qualified affordable housing project investments expect to receive all of their return through the receipt of tax credits and tax deductions from operating losses, and use of the effective yield method results in recognition of the return as a reduction of income tax expense over the period of the investment. The amendments in this Update modify the conditions that a reporting entity must meet to be eligible to use a method other than the equity or cost methods to account for investments in qualified affordable housing projects. Additionally, the amendments introduce new recurring disclosure requirements about investments in qualified affordable housing projects. The amendments in this Update are effective for the Corporation for annual and interim periods beginning in the first quarter 2015, and are to be applied retrospectively. Information concerning the Corporation’s investments in qualified affordable housing projects is provided in Note 14 to these consolidated financial statements.

 

In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-04, Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure. The objective of the amendments in this Update is to reduce diversity among reporting entities by clarifying when an in substance foreclosure occurs. The amendments in this Update clarify that an in substance foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either (1) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure or (2) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. Additionally, the amendments require interim and annual disclosure of both (1) the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and (2) the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to the requirements of the applicable jurisdiction. An entity can elect to adopt the amendments in this Update using either a modified retrospective transition method or a prospective transition method. Under the modified retrospective transition method, an entity would record a cumulative-effect adjustment to residential consumer mortgage loans and foreclosed residential real estate properties existing as of the beginning of the annual period for which the amendments are effective. For prospective transition, an entity would apply the amendments to all instances of an entity receiving physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing consumer mortgage loans that occur after the date of adoption. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in this Update are effective for the Corporation for annual and interim periods beginning in the first quarter 2015, and the Corporation is in the process of determining how it will apply the amendments to its accounting and reporting practices.

 

50
 

 

3. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

Comprehensive income (loss) is the total of (1) net income (loss), and (2) all other changes in equity from non-stockholder sources, which are referred to as other comprehensive income. The components of other comprehensive income (loss), and the related tax effects, are as follows:

 

(In Thousands) Before-
Tax
Income
Tax
Net-of-
Tax
  Amount Effect Amount
2013      
Unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities:      
Unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale securities ($17,623) $6,168 ($11,455)
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) realized in income (1,718) 601 (1,117)
Other comprehensive loss on available-for-sale securities (19,341) 6,769 (12,572)
       
Unfunded pension and postretirement obligations:      
Changes from plan amendments and actuarial gains and losses      
included in other comprehensive income 885 (310) 575
Amortization of net transition obligation, prior service cost and net      
actuarial loss included in net periodic benefit cost 2 (1) 1
Other comprehensive gain on unfunded retirement obligations 887 (311) 576
Total other comprehensive loss ($18,454) $6,458 ($11,996)

 

(In Thousands) Before-Tax Income Tax Net-of-Tax
  Amount Effect Amount
2012      
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities:      
Unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities $4,128 ($1,608) $2,520
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) realized in income (2,682) 939 (1,743)
Other comprehensive gain on available-for-sale securities 1,446 (669) 777
       
Unfunded pension and postretirement obligations:      
Changes from plan amendments and actuarial gains and losses      
included in other comprehensive income 8 (2) 6
Amortization of net transition obligation, prior service cost and net      
actuarial loss included in net periodic benefit cost 77 (17) 60
Other comprehensive gain on unfunded retirement obligations 85 (19) 66
Total other comprehensive income $1,531 ($688) $843

 

51
 

 

(In Thousands) Before-
Tax
Income
Tax
Net-of-
Tax
  Amount Effect Amount
2011      
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities:      
Unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities $20,611 ($7,006) $13,605
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) realized in income (2,216) 753 (1,463)
Other comprehensive gain on available-for-sale securities 18,395 (6,253) 12,142
       
Unfunded pension and postretirement obligations:      
Changes from plan amendments and actuarial gains and losses      
included in other comprehensive income (626) 208 (418)
Amortization of net transition obligation, prior service cost and net      
actuarial loss included in net periodic benefit cost 55 (18) 37
Other comprehensive loss on unfunded retirement obligations (571) 190 (381)
Total other comprehensive income $17,824 ($6,063) $11,761

 

Changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), included in stockholders’ equity, are as follows:

 

(In Thousands) Unrealized Unfunded Accumulated
  Holding Gains Pension and Other
  (Losses) Postretirement Comprehensive
  on Securities Obligations Income (Loss)
2013      
Balance, beginning of period $11,568 ($565) $11,003
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications (11,455) 575 (10,880)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other      
comprehensive loss (1,117) 1 (1,116)
Other comprehensive (loss) (12,572) 576 (11,996)
Balance, end of period ($1,004) $11 ($993)
       
2012      
Balance, beginning of period $10,791 ($631) $10,160
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications 2,520 6 2,526
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other      
comprehensive income (1,743) 60 (1,683)
Other comprehensive income 777 66 843
Balance, end of period $11,568 ($565) $11,003
       
2011      
Balance, beginning of period ($1,351) ($250) ($1,601)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications 13,605 (418) 13,187
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other      
comprehensive income (1,463) 37 (1,426)
Other comprehensive income 12,142 (381) 11,761
Balance, end of period $10,791 ($631) $10,160

 

52
 

 

Items reclassified out of each component of other comprehensive income are as follows:

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2013

(In Thousands)

 

    Reclassified from    
Details about Accumulated Other   Accumulated Other   Affected Line Item in the Consolidated
Comprehensive Income Components   Comprehensive (Loss) Income   Statements of Income
Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale        
Securities   $25   Total other-than-temporary impairment losses on
         available-for-sale securities
    (1,743)   Realized gains on available-for-sale securities, net
    (1,718)   Total before tax
    601   Income tax provision
    (1,117)   Net of tax
         
Amortization of defined benefit pension and postretirement items        
Prior service cost   (31)   Pensions and other employee benefits
Actuarial loss   33   Pensions and other employee benefits
    2   Total before tax
    (1)   Income tax provision
    1   Net of tax
         
Total reclassifications for the period   ($1,116)    

 

4. PER SHARE DATA

 

Net income per share is based on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding. The following data show the amounts used in computing basic and diluted net income per share. As shown in the table that follows, diluted earnings per share is computed using weighted average common shares outstanding, plus weighted-average common shares available from the exercise of all dilutive stock options, less the number of shares that could be repurchased with the proceeds of stock option exercises based on the average share price of the Corporation's common stock during the period.

 

    Weighted-  
    Average Earnings
  Net Common Per
  Income Shares Share
2013      
Earnings per share – basic $18,594,000 12,352,383 $1.51
Dilutive effect of potential common stock      
arising from stock options:      
Exercise of outstanding stock options   250,236  
Hypothetical share repurchase at $19.86   (219,829)  
Earnings per share – diluted $18,594,000 12,382,790 $1.50
       
2012      
Earnings per share – basic $22,705,000 12,235,748 $1.86
Dilutive effect of potential common stock      
arising from stock options:      
Exercise of outstanding stock options   200,589  
Hypothetical share repurchase at $19.16   (176,129)  
Earnings per share – diluted $22,705,000 12,260,208 $1.85

 

53
 

 

    Weighted-  
    Average Earnings
  Net Common Per
  Income Shares Share
2011      
Earnings per share – basic $23,368,000 12,162,045 $1.92
Dilutive effect of potential common stock      
arising from stock options:      
Exercise of outstanding stock options   92,398  
Hypothetical share repurchase at $ 15.87   (87,675)  
Earnings per share – diluted $23,368,000 12,166,768 $1.92

 

Stock options that were anti-dilutive were excluded from net income per share calculations. Weighted-average common shares available from anti-dilutive instruments totaled 88,521 shares in 2013, 145,333 shares in 2012 and 223,333 shares in 2011.

 

5. CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS

 

Cash and due from banks at December 31, 2013 and 2012 include the following:

 

(In thousands) Dec. 31, Dec. 31,
  2013 2012
Cash and cash equivalents $38,591 $55,016
Certificates of deposit 6,028 4,820
Total cash and due from banks $44,619 $59,836

 

Certificates of deposit are issues by U.S. banks with original maturities greater than three months. Each certificate of deposit is fully FDIC-insured. The Corporation maintains cash and cash equivalents with certain financial institutions in excess of the FDIC insurance limit.

 

The Corporation is required to maintain reserves against deposit liabilities in the form of cash and balances with the Federal Reserve Bank. The reserves are based on deposit levels, account activity, and other services provided by the Federal Reserve Bank. Required reserves were $15,318,000 at December 31, 2013 and $14,128,000 at December 31, 2012.

 

6. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

The Corporation measures certain assets at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FASB ASC topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” establishes a framework for measuring fair value that includes a hierarchy used to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used in determining valuations into three levels. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

 

Level 1 – Fair value is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible to the Corporation for identical assets. These generally provide the most reliable evidence and are used to measure fair value whenever available.

 

Level 2 – Fair value is based on significant inputs, other than Level 1 inputs, that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset through corroboration with observable market data. Level 2 inputs include quoted market prices in active markets for similar assets, quoted market prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets and other observable inputs.

 

Level 3 – Fair value is based on significant unobservable inputs. Examples of valuation methodologies that would result in Level 3 classification include option pricing models, discounted cash flows and other similar techniques.

 

The Corporation monitors and evaluates available data relating to fair value measurements on an ongoing basis and recognizes transfers among the levels of the fair value hierarchy as of the date of an event or change in circumstances that affects the valuation method chosen. Examples of such changes may include the market for a particular asset becoming active or inactive, changes in the availability of quoted prices, or changes in the availability of other market data.

 

54
 

 

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, assets measured at fair value and the valuation methods used are as follows:

 

    December 31, 2013  
  Quoted Prices Other    
  in Active Observable Unobservable Total
  Markets Inputs Inputs Fair
(In Thousands) (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Value
         
Recurring fair value measurements        
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES:        
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies $0 $45,877 $0 $45,877
Obligations of states and political subdivisions:        
Tax-exempt 0 128,426 0 128,426
Taxable 0 34,471 0 34,471
Mortgage-backed securities 0 86,208 0 86,208
Collateralized mortgage obligations,        
Issued by U.S. Government agencies 0 178,092 0 178,092
Collateralized debt obligations 0 660 0 660
Total debt securities 0 473,734 0 473,734
Marketable equity securities 8,924 0 0 8,924
Total available-for-sale securities 8,924 473,734 0 482,658
Servicing rights 0 0 1,123 1,123
Total recurring fair value measurements $8,924 $473,734 $1,123 $483,781
         
Nonrecurring fair value measurements        
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance $0 $0 $9,889 $9,889
Valuation allowance 0 0 (2,333) (2,333)
Impaired loans, net 0 0 7,556 7,556
Foreclosed assets held for sale 0 0 892 892
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements $0 $0 $8,448 $8,448

 

55
 

 

    December 31, 2012  
  Quoted Prices Other    
  in Active Observable Unobservable Total
  Markets Inputs Inputs Fair
(In Thousands) (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Value
         
Recurring fair value measurements        
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES:        
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies $0 $31,217 $0 $31,217
Obligations of states and political subdivisions:        
Tax-exempt 0 137,020 0 137,020
Taxable 0 24,817 0 24,817
Mortgage-backed securities 0 80,196 0 80,196
Collateralized mortgage obligations,        
Issued by U.S. Government agencies 0 183,510 0 183,510
Trust preferred securities issued by individual institutions 0 5,171 0 5,171
Collateralized debt obligations:        
Pooled trust preferred securities - senior tranches 0 0 1,613 1,613
Other collateralized debt obligations 0 660 0 660
Total debt securities 0 462,591 1,613 464,204
Marketable equity securities 8,373 0 0 8,373
Total available-for-sale securities 8,373 462,591 1,613 472,577
Servicing rights 0 0 605 605
Total recurring fair value measurements $8,373 $462,591 $2,218 $473,182
         
Nonrecurring fair value measurements        
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance $0 $0 $2,710 $2,710
Valuation allowance 0 0 (623) (623)
Impaired loans, net 0 0 2,087 2,087
Foreclosed assets held for sale 0 0 879 879
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements $0 $0 $2,966 $2,966

 

Loans are classified as impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Foreclosed assets held for sale consist of real estate acquired by foreclosure. For impaired commercial loans secured by real estate and foreclosed assets held for sale, estimated fair values are determined primarily using values from third-party appraisals less estimated selling costs.

 

Management’s evaluation and selection of valuation techniques and the unobservable inputs used in determining the fair values of assets valued using Level 3 methodologies include sensitive assumptions. Other market participants might use substantially different assumptions, which could result in calculations of fair values that would be substantially different than the amount calculated by management. The following table shows quantitative information regarding significant techniques and inputs used at December 31, 2013 and 2012 for assets measured using unobservable inputs (Level 3 methodologies) on a recurring basis:

 

56