FORM 10-QSB

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

or

 

          TO           .

 

AMERICAN HOME FOOD PRODUCTS INC.

(Formerly Novex Systems International Inc.)

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code 914-441-3591

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o.

 

The Company had 4,466,455 shares of its $.001 par value common stock and no shares of its $.001 par value preferred stock issued and outstanding on February 28, 2007.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

 

None

 

---

AMERICAN HOME FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.

 

Index

Page No.

 

 

 

 

Statements of Operations for the

nine months ended February 28, 2007 and

 

Statements of Cash Flows for the

nine months ended February 28, 2007 and

 

 

 

 

 

Part II  Other Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ii

 

---

PART I

 

Page No.

 

 

 

Statements of Operations for the

nine months ended February 28, 2007 and

 

Statements of Cash Flows for the

nine months ended February 28, 2007 and

 

 

 

 

iii

 

---

AMERICAN HOME FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
BALANCE SHEET
February 28, 2007
(Unaudited)

See notes to financial statements.
F-1

 

---

AMERICAN HOME FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See notes to financial statements.
F-2

 

---

AMERICAN HOME FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

See notes to financial statements.
F-3

 

---

AMERICAN HOME FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NINE MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2007

(UNAUDITED)

 

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements of American Home Food Products, Inc. (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and Regulation S-B. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation (consisting of normal recurring accruals) have been included. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Operating results expected for the nine months ended February 28, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending May 31, 2007. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2006. Per share data for the periods are based upon the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during such periods, plus net additional shares issued upon exercise of options and warrants.

 

 

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has suffered from recurring losses from operations, and has a negative working capital and shareholder deficiency as of February 28, 2007. The Company is also in arrears with paying payroll taxes and in default with certain of its debt holders. These factors raise substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management expects to incur additional losses in the foreseeable future and recognizes the need to raise capital to achieve their business plans. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

 

The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation plans under Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25, (APB25) Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and the related interpretation, for which no compensation cost is recorded in the statement of operations for the estimated fair value of stock options issued with an exercise price equal to the fair value

 

F-4

 

---

of the common stock on the date of grant. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS 123) Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 (SFAS 148) Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, requires the companies, which do not elect to account for stock-based compensation as prescribed by this statement, to disclose the pro-forma effects on earnings and earnings per share as if SFAS 123 has been adopted. No options or warrants have been granted to employees, officers and directors during fiscal year ended 2006 and through February 28, 2007.

 

 

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other receivables, due to factor, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying amounts of long-term debt were also estimated to approximate fair value.

 

 

Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. For the periods ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, diluted loss per share is the same as basic loss per share since the inclusion of stock operations and warrants would be antidilutive.

 

 

The preparation of financials statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

 

FASB 155 – Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments

 

In February 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 155, which is an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140. This Statement; a) permits fair value re-measurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation, b) clarifies which interest-only strip and principal-only strip are not subject to the requirements of Statement 133, c) establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, d) clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives, e) amends Statement 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative

 

F-5

 

---

financial instrument. This Statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. Earlier adoption of this Statement is permitted as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year, provided the entity has not yet issued any financial statements for that fiscal year. Management believes this Statement will have no impact on the financial statements of the Company once adopted.

 

FASB 156 – Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets

 

In March 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 156, which amends FASB Statement No. 140. This Statement establishes, among other things, the accounting for all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. This Statement amends Statement 140 to require that all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. This Statement permits, but does not require, the subsequent measurement of separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value. An entity that uses derivative instruments to mitigate the risks inherent in servicing assets and servicing liabilities is required to account for those derivative instruments at fair value. Under this Statement, an entity can elect subsequent fair value measurement to account for its separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. By electing that option, an entity may simplify its accounting because this Statement permits income statement recognition of the potential offsetting changes in fair value of those servicing assets and servicing liabilities and derivative instruments in the same accounting period. This Statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. Earlier adoption of this Statement is permitted as of the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year, provided the entity has not yet issued any financial statements for that fiscal year. Management believes this Statement will have no impact on the financial statements of the Company once adopted.

 

FASB 157 - Fair Value Measurements

 

In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the Board having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is a relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application of this Statement will change current practices. This Statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Earlier application is permitted provided that the reporting entity has not yet issued financial statements for that fiscal year. Management believes this Statement will have no impact on the financial statements of the Company once adopted.

 

 

F-6

 

---

 

In December 2006, the Company and a judgment creditor agreed to extend to March 31, 2007, a previous agreement whereby the creditor will refrain from enforcing its judgment in exchange for a monthly payment of interest on the creditor’s original loan to the Company and the Company’s commitment to pay the judgment upon the earlier of the recapitalization of the Company or March 31, 2007. In exchange for this extension, the Company agreed to issue 60,000 shares of common stock to the creditor. The Company recorded an interest expense of $9,000 in connection with these shares based on the fair market value of such shares issued.

 

In January 2007, the Company issued 105,000 shares of common stock in exchange for investor relation services. The company recorded an expense of $15,750 in connection with these shares based on the fair market value of such shares issued. In January 2007, a private investor made an equity investment of $15,000 for which he received 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The proceeds were used for working capital.

 

In February 2007, a private investor made an equity investment of $20,000 for which it received 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The proceeds were used for working capital. In February 2007, the Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock in exchange for consulting services. The company recorded an expense of $30,000 in connection with these shares based on the fair market value of such shares issued.

 

 

 

F-7

 

---

Condition and Results of Operations

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the information contained in the Financial Statements and the Notes to the financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-QSB. The Financial Statements for the nine month period ending February 28, 2007, included in this Form 10-QSB are unaudited; however, this information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present a fair statement of the results for the interim period.

 

Results of Operations

 

Nine months ending February 28, 2007 vs. February 28, 2006

 

In the nine month period ended February 28, 2007, the Company had net sales of $179,362 versus $154,181 in the corresponding nine month period in 2006. In both periods the Company generated a gross margin of 100% which is attributable to the Company’s conversion of its business from a manufacturing company into a licensing company. Since February 2003, the Company has maintained an exclusive licensing agreement with CGM, Inc., whereby CGM fulfills all orders for products sold under the trade names that the Company continues to own and thereafter pays the Company a cash royalty on sales (“Licensing Agreement”). All royalty payments are based on actual sales in the previous month and are paid on a monthly basis.

 

In this nine month period, the Company recorded a loss from operations of $144,268 and a net loss to common shareholders of $285,928. In the nine month period, the Company incurred financing charges of $141,660. Until the Company can either refinance its outstanding debt, or merge with another company which will include a refinancing of the debt, it will continue to accrue inordinate debt charges. The Company incurred selling, general and administrative costs of $323,630, which included $37,884 of amortization charges.

 

On February 28, 2007, the Company had $12,891 in current assets, which represented the royalty receivable. The Company has intangible assets of $402,275, which represents the book value of its trademarks, trade names and customer list, which collectively are the assets that generate the royalty income that the Company earns.

 

Three months ending February 28, 2007 vs. February 28, 2006

 

In the three month period ended February 28, 2007, the Company had net sales of $45,398 versus $51,712 in the corresponding three month period in 2006. The net loss of $146,768 includes $12,628 of amortization charges and $52,521 in interest charges.

 

Liquidity and Financial Resources at February 28, 2007

 

As of February 28, 2007, the Company had $3,673,849 in current liabilities, which includes loans (including interest) that are now due totaling $2,692,154 which were used to fund the Company’s operations. These loans are principally to shareholders of the Company. It had accounts payable of $451,295 and accrued taxes of $530,400.

 

1

 

---

Of the principal loans outstanding, $1,120,958 is held by one person that has properly perfected security interest against the Company’s remaining assets, being all its intangible property.

 

The Company is planning to increase its royalty revenue and use excess cash proceeds to pay down its debt while it continues to pursue a new business that could be merged with the Company. With any merger the Company will seek to refinance its debt by either paying off all debt in cash or an offer of cash and stock. Although the Company is required to carry its intangible property at a net value of $402,275, it believes that the fair market value for these assets is much higher. As such, the Company believes that a refinancing that would enable creditors to receive cash and some additional equity in the company will eliminate all debts.

 

Until such time as the Company shall merge with another entity, its current cash flow is sufficient to meet its fixed monthly expenses.

 

Inflation and Changing Prices

 

The Company no longer manufacturers its products and is no longer subject to risks associated with inflation or substantial price increase in the near future.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure on contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

 

Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that our critical accounting policies are limited to those described below. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies see our note 2 to our financial statements.

 

Long-Lived Assets (including Tangible and Intangible Assets)

 

We acquired businesses in recent years, which resulted in tangible assets being recorded. The determination of the value of such intangible assets requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect our consolidated financial statements. We assess potential impairment to the intangible and tangible assets on a quarterly basis or when evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an assets may not be recovered. Our judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators, if any, and future cash flows related to these assets are based on operational performance of our business, market conditions and other factors.

 

 

2

 

---

Accounting for Income Taxes

 

As part of the process of preparing our financial statements we are required to estimate our income taxes. Management judgment is required in determining our provision of our deferred tax asset. We recorded a valuation for the full deferred tax asset from our net operating losses carried forward due to the Company not demonstrating any consistent profitable operations. In the event that the actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods we may need to adjust such valuation recorded.

 

Going Concern

 

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has had negative working capital for each of the last two years ended May 31, 2006 and 2005, however the Company currently has little if any mandatory expenses associated with its operating business and, therefore, can continue to operate, while it seeks new acquisition candidates that will enable the Company to complete its recapitalization plan. Notwithstanding these future plans, which the Company can provide no assurances that they will happen, the current level of liabilities that accumulate through monthly accruals raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

 

Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, who is the sole officer and employee, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in this report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (1) is accumulated and communicated to its management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and (2) has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

 

During the period covered by this report, there have not been any significant changes in our internal controls or, to our knowledge, in other factors that could significantly affect our internal controls.

 

 

 

The former shareholders of the Sta-Dri company filed a lawsuit for unpaid royalty payments and received a judgment in the amount of $95,000.

 

3

 

---

Other trade creditors have commenced lawsuits against the Company to secure payment on unsecured claims, however none of these judgment can be satisfied against the Company assets due to there being a properly perfected security interest in place with a financial creditor that is willing to work with the company.

 

 

In December 2006, the Company issued 60,000 shares of common stock to a creditor in exchange for an extension of an earlier settlement agreement. (See Notes to Financials, Note 3-Stock Issued). The Company recorded an interest expense of $9,000 in connection with these shares.

 

In January 2007, the Company issued 105,000 shares of common stock in exchange for investor relation services. The company recorded an expense of $15,750 in connection with these shares. In January 2007, a private investor made an equity investment of $15,000 for which the investor received 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The proceeds were used for working capital.

 

In February 2007, a private investor made an equity investment of $20,000 for which the investor received 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The proceeds were used for working capital. In February 2007, the Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock in exchange for consulting services. The company recorded an expense of $30,000 in connection with these shares.

 

 

 

 

In January 2006, the Company and a judgment creditor reached an agreement whereby the creditor agreed to refrain from enforcing its judgment in exchange for a monthly payment of interest on the creditor’s original loan to the Company and the Company’s commitment to pay the judgment upon the earlier of the recapitalization of the Company or September 30, 2006. In September 2006, the judgment creditor agreed to extend the agreement to December 31, 2006. In December 2006, the creditor agreed to a further extension of the settlement agreement to March 31, 2007, in exchange for which the Company agreed to issue to the creditor 60,000 shares of common stock.

 

 

On December 11, 2006, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Form 8-K announcing that it had entered into a non-binding Letter of Intent to acquire 100% of the ownership interests in a privately-held specialty food company. The Form 8-K was filed to alert shareholders that the Company was actively pursuing a transaction and to avoid any prospective investor that the company could meet with to discuss the business opportunity from having material inside information.

 

 

4

 

---

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, American Home Food Products, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned person who is duly authorized to sign on behalf of the Company as its principal executive officer and principal financial officer.

 

AMERICAN HOME FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.

 

By: /s/ Daniel W. Dowe  

Daniel W. Dowe

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

Date: April 13, 2007

 

 

5

 

---