Table of Contents
As filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2007
Registration No. 333-[·]
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM F-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
ArcelorMittal
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Luxembourg | 3312 | Not Applicable | ||
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
ArcelorMittal
19, Avenue de la Liberté
L-2930 Luxembourg
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
+352 4792-2414
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of
Registrant’s principal executive offices)
Carlos M. Hernandez, Esq.
Mittal Steel USA Inc.
1 S. Dearborn, 19th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60603
(312) 899-3400
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent of service)
Copies to:
| Henk Scheffer, Esq. ArcelorMittal 19, Avenue de la Liberté L-2930 Luxembourg Grand Duchy of Luxembourg +352 4792-2414 |
John D. Brinitzer, Esq. Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP 12, rue de Tilsitt 75008 Paris France +33 1 40 74 68 00 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale of the securities to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
| Title of each class of securities to be registered |
Amount registered(1) |
Proposed maximum offering price per unit |
Proposed maximum aggregate offering price(2) |
Amount of registration fee(3) | ||||||
| Ordinary shares |
105,000,000 | N/A | $ | 6,536,250,000 | $ | 200,662.88 | ||||
| (1) | Calculated as the sum of (a) the product of (x) 95,000,000 (the estimated number of Mittal Steel shares held by U.S. holders as of the date hereof) and (y) 1 (the exchange rate of ArcelorMittal shares per Mittal Steel share applicable to exchanges pursuant to this registration statement) and (b) an additional 10,000,000 ArcelorMittal shares that may be sold in the United States following the offer. ArcelorMittal shares are not being registered for purposes of the offer/proxy solicitation outside of the United States. |
| (2) | Pursuant to Rule 457(c) and Rule 457(f), and solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee, the proposed maximum aggregate offering price is equal to the product of (a) a market value of $62.25 per share of Mittal Steel, corresponding to the average of the high and low prices for the Mittal Steel class A common shares reported on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, on June 26, 2007, (b) 1 (the exchange rate of ArcelorMittal shares per Mittal Steel class A or class B common share applicable to exchanges pursuant to this registration statement), and (c) the number of ArcelorMittal shares to be registered. |
| (3) | Computed in accordance with Rule 457(f) under the Securities Act as the proposed maximum aggregate offering price of $6,536,250,000 multiplied by .0000307. |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective time until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until this Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
Table of Contents
The information contained herein is subject to completion or amendment. No securities may be sold until a registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities, in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale is not permitted or would be unlawful.
Subject to Completion, dated June 29, 2007
To the Shareholders of Mittal Steel Company N.V.:
You are cordially invited to attend the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of Mittal Steel Company N.V., which is referred to as Mittal Steel, scheduled for August 28, 2007, at Hotel Okura Amsterdam Ferdinand Bolstraat 333, 1072 LH Amsterdam, The Netherlands. At the extraordinary general meeting, you will be asked to adopt the decision to merge Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal, a company incorporated and domiciled in Luxembourg that has no prior operations, as contemplated by the merger proposal (voorstel tot fusie) and the explanatory memorandum (toelichting op het voorstel tot fusie), dated as of June 25, 2007, which are referred to as the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum. In the merger, Mittal Steel will merge into ArcelorMittal by way of absorption by ArcelorMittal of Mittal Steel and without liquidation of Mittal Steel. The combined company will be named “ArcelorMittal”.
Upon effectiveness of the merger, each Mittal Steel share that you own at the effective time of the merger will be converted into one newly issued ArcelorMittal share with a par value of €0.01 each, which are referred to as ArcelorMittal shares. All ArcelorMittal shares issued immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will be cancelled upon effectiveness of the merger. Based on the number of Mittal Steel shares issued on the date hereof, ArcelorMittal expects to issue between 1,277,408,250 and 1,419,342,499 ArcelorMittal shares to Mittal Steel shareholders in the merger. The exact number of ArcelorMittal shares to be issued will depend on any increase or decrease in the number of Mittal Steel treasury shares between the date hereof and the date of the extraordinary general meeting adopting the decision to merge Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal. Application will be made to the relevant authorities for the admission of the ArcelorMittal shares to trading on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s regulated market and for the listing of these shares on the Official List of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, and for the admission to trading and listing of the ArcelorMittal shares on Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the stock exchanges of Barcelona, Bilbao, Madrid and Valencia and the New York Stock Exchange. Immediately following the effectiveness of the merger, former Mittal Steel shareholders will hold ArcelorMittal shares representing 100% of the then-issued and outstanding ArcelorMittal shares.
The merger cannot be effected unless, among other things, Mittal Steel shareholders adopt the decision to merge as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum (among other conditions set forth in this proxy statement/prospectus). The decision to merge requires:
| • | if less than 50% of the outstanding Mittal Steel shares are represented in person or by proxy at the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the Mittal Steel shares represented in person or by proxy at the extraordinary general meeting, or |
| • | if at least 50% of the outstanding Mittal Steel shares are represented in person or by proxy at the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the Mittal Steel shares represented in person or by proxy at the extraordinary general meeting. |
Assuming that all conditions precedent will be satisfied or waived (where legally permissible), Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal currently expect that the merger will be effective on or about September 3, 2007.
The Mittal Steel Board of Directors has carefully reviewed and considered the terms and conditions of the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum. Based on its review, the Mittal Steel Board of Directors has determined that the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum and the transactions contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum are in the best interests of Mittal Steel and the Mittal Steel shareholders. The Mittal Steel Board of Directors unanimously recommends that Mittal Steel shareholders vote “FOR” the decision to merge as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum.
The accompanying disclosure documents (including the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, included as Annex B to this proxy statement/prospectus) contain detailed information about the merger and the extraordinary general meeting. This document is also a prospectus for the ArcelorMittal shares that will be issued in the merger. We encourage Mittal Steel shareholders to read carefully this proxy statement/prospectus before voting, including the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 40 of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Table of Contents
Your vote is very important. You are encouraged to vote.
Sincerely,
| Lakshmi N. Mittal |
| Chairman of Board of Directors |
| Mittal Steel Company N.V. |
Neither the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the securities to be issued under this proxy statement/prospectus or determined if this proxy statement/prospectus is accurate or adequate. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This proxy statement/prospectus is dated [·], 2007 and is first being mailed to Mittal Steel shareholders on or about [·], 2007.
ii
Table of Contents
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference important business and financial information about Mittal Steel from documents filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which is referred to as the SEC, that are not included in or delivered with this proxy statement/prospectus. For a more detailed description of the documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus and how you may obtain them, see “Where You Can Find More Information”.
Documents incorporated by reference are available to you without charge upon your written or oral request, excluding any exhibits to those documents, unless the exhibit is specifically incorporated by reference as an exhibit in this proxy statement/prospectus. You can obtain any of these documents from the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov, by requesting them in writing or by telephone from Mittal Steel or ArcelorMittal or by accessing Mittal Steel’s or ArcelorMittal’s websites.
| Mittal Steel Company N.V. Hofplein 20 3032 AC Rotterdam The Netherlands +31 10 217 8800 Attention: Investor Relations |
ArcelorMittal 19, Avenue de la Liberté L-2930 Luxembourg Grand Duchy of Luxembourg +352 4792-2414 Attention: Investor Relations | |
| www.arcelormittal.com | www.arcelormittal.com |
In order for you to receive timely delivery of documents incorporated by reference in advance of the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting, Mittal Steel or ArcelorMittal should receive your request by no later than August 21, 2007.
Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal are not incorporating the contents of the websites of the SEC, Mittal Steel, ArcelorMittal or any other person into this proxy statement/prospectus. Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal are providing the information about how you can obtain documents that are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus at these websites only for your convenience. See “Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference”.
ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT
This proxy statement/prospectus, which forms part of a registration statement on Form F-4 filed with the SEC by ArcelorMittal (File No. 333-·), constitutes a prospectus of ArcelorMittal under Section 5 of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which is referred to as the Securities Act, with respect to the ArcelorMittal shares to be issued to Mittal Steel shareholders as required by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum.
iii
Table of Contents
| Questions and Answers about the Merger and the Mittal Steel Extraordinary General Meeting |
1 | |
| 4 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 | ||
| 6 | ||
| Recommendation of the Mittal Steel Board of Directors and Its Reasons for the Merger |
6 | |
| 6 | ||
| 7 | ||
| 7 | ||
| Directors and Management of the Combined Company After the Merger |
8 | |
| Name and Executive Offices of the Combined Company After the Merger |
8 | |
| 8 | ||
| 9 | ||
| 9 | ||
| 9 | ||
| 9 | ||
| 10 | ||
| 10 | ||
| 10 | ||
| 11 | ||
| Comparison of Rights of Mittal Steel Shareholders and ArcelorMittal Shareholders |
11 | |
| 12 | ||
| 16 | ||
18 | ||
| 36 | ||
| 36 | ||
| 36 | ||
| 37 | ||
| 37 | ||
| 39 | ||
| 40 | ||
| 40 | ||
| 40 | ||
| 48 | ||
| 52 | ||
| 54 | ||
| 58 | ||
| The Merger Agreement, the Merger Proposal and the Explanatory Memorandum |
68 | |
| 73 | ||
| 76 | ||
| 80 | ||
| 98 | ||
| Comparison of Rights of Mittal Steel Shareholders and ArcelorMittal Shareholders |
106 | |
| 113 | ||
| 123 | ||
| 128 | ||
| 129 | ||
| 131 | ||
| 132 | ||
| 133 | ||
| Annexes |
||
| A-1 | ||
| B-1 | ||
Table of Contents
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER AND THE MITTAL STEEL EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING
The following are some questions that you may have regarding the proposed merger and the other matters being considered at the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting and brief answers to those questions. ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel urge you to read carefully the remainder of this proxy statement/prospectus, including without limitation the merger agreement, the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, copies of which are attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A and Annex B, respectively, because the information in this section does not provide all the information that might be important to you with respect to the proposed merger. Additional important information is also contained in the annexes to, and the documents incorporated by reference in, this proxy statement/prospectus.
| Q: | What is the proposed transaction? |
| A: | In 2006, Mittal Steel conducted a mixed cash and exchange offer, which is referred to as the Offer, for the outstanding shares, American depositary shares and convertible bonds (OCEANES) of Arcelor. As a result of the Offer, Mittal Steel obtained approximately 94% of the share capital and the voting rights of Arcelor and on August 1, 2006 Arcelor became a subsidiary of Mittal Steel and its results of operations have been included in Mittal Steel’s consolidated results of operations from that date. In connection with the Offer, Mittal Steel, Arcelor, and Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal and Mrs. Usha Mittal, the latter two referred to together as the “Significant shareholder”, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on June 25, 2006 (the “Memorandum of Understanding” or “MOU”), pursuant to which it was agreed, among other things, that Mittal Steel would be merged into Arcelor as soon as practicable following the completion of Mittal Steel’s offer for Arcelor and that the combined entity would be incorporated, domiciled and headquartered in Luxembourg. |
As a first step in a two-step merger process to combine Mittal Steel and Arcelor in a single legal entity governed by Luxembourg law, on May 2, 2007, Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal entered into a merger agreement, which provides that Mittal Steel will merge into ArcelorMittal, by way of absorption by ArcelorMittal of Mittal Steel and without liquidation of Mittal Steel. The combined company will be named “ArcelorMittal”. As soon as practicable after effectiveness of the merger of Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal, ArcelorMittal intends to merge into Arcelor by way of absorption by Arcelor of ArcelorMittal and without liquidation of ArcelorMittal. For a more complete description of the merger process, see “The Merger”.
ArcelorMittal was incorporated on August 13, 2004 under the name Verger Investments S.A. It has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mittal Steel since April 24, 2007 and was renamed “ArcelorMittal” on April 26, 2007. ArcelorMittal has not conducted operations to date and will not have conducted any operations prior to the merger. ArcelorMittal currently does not have any assets, liabilities (contingent or otherwise) or commitments, other than assets consisting of an immaterial amount of cash. It is being used to facilitate the two-step merger process described above.
| Q: | Why is the merger of Mittal Steel into Arcelor being effected in two steps? |
| A: | The first-step merger will enable Mittal Steel to comply more rapidly and efficiently with part of the MOU undertakings. In addition, the first-step merger will permit a simplification of the group’s corporate structure as both ArcelorMittal and Arcelor will be located in the same jurisdiction (Luxembourg) with the same headquarters. The first-step merger, which will be completed before the second-step merger, will thereby contribute to a more efficient and rapid integration of the management and administrative teams of Mittal Steel and Arcelor, which are currently located in Rotterdam, Luxembourg and London. |
The second-step merger will constitute the second and final step of the combination of Mittal Steel and Arcelor into a single legal entity governed by Luxembourg law. In the second-step merger, ArcelorMittal (the surviving entity in the Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal merger) will merge into Arcelor and shareholders of ArcelorMittal will become shareholders of Arcelor, which will subsequently be renamed “ArcelorMittal”. The second-step merger will be subject to shareholder approval at the level of Arcelor and ArcelorMittal, which corporate approvals will be sought following effectiveness of the first-step merger.
1
Table of Contents
| Q: | Why am I receiving this proxy statement/prospectus? |
| A: | In order to complete the merger, Mittal Steel shareholders must adopt the decision to merge Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum. The decision to merge requires: |
| • | if less than 50% of the outstanding Mittal Steel shares are represented in person or by proxy at the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the Mittal Steel shares represented in person or by proxy at the extraordinary general meeting, or |
| • | if at least 50% of the outstanding Mittal Steel shares are represented in person or by proxy at the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the Mittal Steel shares represented in person or by proxy at the extraordinary general meeting. |
This proxy statement/prospectus, including the merger agreement, the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, copies of which are attached to this prospectus/proxy statement as Annexes A and B, respectively, contain important information about the proposed merger and the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting. You should read this proxy statement/prospectus carefully. The enclosed U.S. proxy card allows you to vote your shares without attending in person the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting.
Your vote is very important. You are encouraged to vote.
| Q: | What will Mittal Steel shareholders receive in the merger? |
| A: | In the merger, a holder of Mittal Steel class A common shares will receive one newly issued ArcelorMittal share for every one Mittal Steel class A common share, which is referred to as the Class A Exchange Ratio. A holder of Mittal Steel class B common shares will receive one newly issued ArcelorMittal share for every one Mittal Steel class B common share, which is referred to as the Class B Exchange Ratio. For a more complete description of what Mittal Steel shareholders will receive in the merger, see “The Merger Agreement, the Merger Proposal and the Explanatory Memorandum—Merger Consideration”. |
| Q: | What will happen in the proposed merger to options to purchase Mittal Steel shares? |
| A: | The merger proposal provides that each option to purchase Mittal Steel shares granted under employee and director stock plans of Mittal Steel will be converted into a right to acquire (or at ArcelorMittal’s option, subscribe) the same number of ArcelorMittal shares, on the same terms and conditions as were applicable to such options prior to the effective time of the merger (subject to any changes necessary to reflect the effectiveness of the merger). |
| Q: | What conditions are required to be fulfilled to effect the merger? |
| A: | Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal are not required to effect the merger unless certain specified conditions are satisfied or waived, where legally permissible. These conditions include, among other things, adoption of the decision to merge by the Mittal Steel shareholders, adoption of the decision to merge and approval of the issuance of ArcelorMittal shares to be issued in the merger and related matters by Mittal Steel as the sole ArcelorMittal shareholder, the admission to trading and listing of the ArcelorMittal shares on Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the regulated market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, and the stock exchanges of Barcelona, Bilbao, Madrid and Valencia, which are collectively referred to as the Spanish exchanges. For a complete description of the conditions that must be satisfied or waived (where legally permissible) prior to effectiveness of the merger, see “The Merger Agreement, the Merger Proposal and the Explanatory Memorandum—Conditions to Effectiveness of the Merger”. |
| Q: | When do Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal expect the merger to be effective? |
| A: | Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal are working to effect the merger as promptly as practicable and legally possible following the day on which the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of Mittal Steel will be held to adopt the decision to merge as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum. Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal currently expect that the merger will be effective on or about September 3, 2007. |
2
Table of Contents
| Q: | Are Mittal Steel shareholders entitled to dissenters’ rights? |
| A: | No. Mittal Steel shareholders will not have any appraisal or dissenters’ rights under Dutch law or under Mittal Steel’s articles of association in connection with the merger, and neither Mittal Steel nor ArcelorMittal will independently provide Mittal Steel shareholders with any such rights. |
| Q: | How does the Mittal Steel Board of Directors recommend that Mittal Steel shareholders vote? |
| A: | The Mittal Steel Board of Directors has determined that the merger agreement, the merger proposal and explanatory memorandum and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, the merger proposal and explanatory memorandum are in the best interests of Mittal Steel and the Mittal Steel shareholders and unanimously recommends that Mittal Steel shareholders vote “FOR” the decision to merge Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal as contemplated by the merger proposal and explanatory memorandum. For a more complete description of the recommendation of the Mittal Steel Board of Directors, see “The Merger—Recommendation of the Mittal Steel Board of Directors and Its Reasons for the Merger”. |
| Q: | When and where will the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting be held? |
| A: | The Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting will be held on August 28, 2007, at 2 p.m., Amsterdam time, at Hotel Okura Amsterdam located at Ferdinand Bolstraat 333, 1072 LH Amsterdam, The Netherlands. |
| Q: | Who can attend and vote at the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting? |
| A: | You can vote at the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting if you own Mittal Steel shares at the close of business on August 21, 2007, which is referred to as the registration date. |
| Q: | What should Mittal Steel shareholders do now in order to vote on the proposal being considered at the extraordinary general meeting? |
| A: | In order to vote their shares in person or by proxy, holders of Mittal Steel class A common shares and Mittal Steel class B common shares must register and/or complete, sign, date and return a proxy card before certain specific dates. For a detailed description of the required actions and the corresponding dates by which such actions must be completed in order to vote on the proposal being considered at the extraordinary general meeting, see “The Mittal Steel Extraordinary General Meeting”. |
| Q: | May I change my vote after I have delivered my proxy? |
| A: | If you are a holder of Mittal Steel class A common shares whose ownership is directly or indirectly recorded in Mittal Steel’s New York shareholder registry, which are referred to as New York Registry Shares, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by timely delivering a properly executed, later-dated proxy or by voting at the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting, provided that you have revoked your proxy before August 23, 2007. See “The Mittal Steel Extraordinary General Meeting”. Simply attending the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting without voting will not revoke your proxy. |
Holders of Mittal Steel class A common shares whose ownership is directly or indirectly recorded in Mittal Steel’s Dutch or Luxembourg shareholder registry, which are referred to as European Registry Shares, and Mittal Steel class B common shares cannot revoke their proxy.
| Q: | What should I do if I receive more than one set of voting materials for the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting? |
| A: | You may receive more than one set of voting materials for the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting, including multiple copies of this proxy statement/prospectus and multiple U.S. proxy cards. For example, if you hold your Mittal Steel shares in more than one brokerage account, you will receive a separate U.S. proxy card for each securities account in which you hold shares. Please complete, sign, date and return each U.S. proxy card that you receive. |
| Q: | Who can help to answer my questions? |
| A: | If you have any questions about the merger or how to submit your proxy, or if you need additional copies of this proxy statement/prospectus, the enclosed U.S. proxy card or the voting instructions, you should contact ArcelorMittal Investor Relations at +352-4792-2414 or +312-899-3569. |
3
Table of Contents
The following is a summary that highlights information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus. This summary may not contain all the information that is important to you. For a more complete description of the merger agreement, the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal encourage you to read carefully this entire proxy statement/prospectus, including the attached annexes. In addition, Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal encourage you to read the information incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, which includes important business and financial information about Mittal Steel that has been filed with the SEC. You may obtain the information incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus without charge by following the instructions in the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information”.
ArcelorMittal
ArcelorMittal was incorporated on August 13, 2004 under the name Verger Investments S.A. It has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mittal Steel since April 24, 2007 and was renamed “ArcelorMittal” on April 26, 2007. ArcelorMittal has not conducted operations to date and will not have conducted any operations prior to the merger. ArcelorMittal currently does not have any assets, liabilities (contingent or otherwise) or commitments, other than assets consisting of an immaterial amount of cash. The mailing address and telephone number of ArcelorMittal’s principal executive offices are:
ArcelorMittal
19, Avenue de la Liberté
L-2930 Luxembourg
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
+352 4792-2414
ArcelorMittal shares are not currently admitted to trading or listed on any stock exchange. Application will be made to the relevant authorities for the admission of the ArcelorMittal shares to trading on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s regulated market and for the listing of these shares on the Official List of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, and for the admission to trading and the listing of the ArcelorMittal shares on Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the stock exchanges of Barcelona, Bilbao, Madrid and Valencia (which are collectively referred to as the Spanish exchanges), and the New York Stock Exchange.
Mittal Steel
Mittal Steel is the world’s largest and most global steel producer. In 2006, Mittal Steel increased its size significantly by acquiring Arcelor, which, at the time of its acquisition, was the world’s second-largest steel producer by production volume. On a pro forma basis after giving effect to its acquisition of Arcelor as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2006, Mittal Steel had sales of approximately $87.5 billion, steel shipments of approximately 110.5 million tonnes and an annual production capacity of approximately 138 million tonnes of crude steel for the year ended December 31, 2006. (“Tonnes” or “MT” are metric tonnes and are used in measurements involving iron ore, iron ore pellets, direct reduced iron, hot metal, coke, coal, pig iron and scrap (a metric tonne is equal to 1,000 kilograms or 2,204.62 pounds)).
Mittal Steel is the largest steel producer in the Americas, Africa, and Europe, and it has a growing presence in Asia. Mittal Steel has steel-making operations in 26 countries on four continents, including 64 integrated, mini-mill and integrated mini-mill steel-making facilities. As of December 31, 2006, Mittal Steel had approximately 320,000 employees.
Mittal Steel produces a broad range of high-quality finished and semi-finished carbon steel products. Specifically, Mittal Steel produces flat products, including sheet and plate, long products, including bars, rods and structural shapes, and stainless steel products. Mittal Steel sells its products primarily in local markets and through its centralized marketing organization to a diverse range of customers in approximately 187 countries, including the automotive, appliance, engineering, construction and machinery industries.
4
Table of Contents
Mittal Steel operates its business in six reportable operating segments: Flat Carbon Americas; Flat Carbon Europe; Long Carbon Americas and Europe; Asia, Africa and CIS; Stainless Steel; and Arcelor Mittal Steel Solutions and Services (trading and distribution). Mittal Steel’s steel-making operations have a high degree of geographic diversification. Approximately 35% of its steel is produced in the Americas, approximately 48% is produced in Europe and approximately 17% is produced in other countries, such as Kazakhstan, Algeria and South Africa. In addition, Mittal Steel’s sales are balanced both geographically and between developed and developing markets, which have different characteristics.
Mittal Steel has access to high-quality and low-cost raw materials through its captive sources and long-term contracts. In 2006, on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the acquisition of Arcelor (assuming full production of iron ore at Dofasco for captive use), approximately 45% of Mittal Steel’s requirements of iron ore and approximately 9% of its coal requirements were supplied from its own mines or from long-term contracts at many of its operating units. Mittal Steel is actively developing its raw material self-sufficiency, including through recent initiatives to gain or expand access to iron ore sources in Liberia, Ukraine and Senegal. In addition, Mittal Steel is the world’s largest producer of direct reduced iron, or DRI, which is a scrap substitute used in the mini-mill steel-making process, with total production on a pro forma basis of approximately 9.3 million tonnes in 2006. Mittal Steel’s DRI production satisfies all of its mini-mill input requirements. Mittal Steel is one of the world’s largest producers of coke, a critical raw material derived from coal, and it satisfies approximately 76% of its coke needs. Mittal Steel’s facilities have good access to shipping facilities, including its eleven deep-water port facilities and its railway sidings.
Mittal Steel is a successor to a business founded in 1989 by Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer. Mittal Steel has experienced rapid and steady growth since then largely through the consistent and disciplined execution of a successful consolidation-based strategy. Mittal Steel made its first acquisition in 1989, leasing the Iron & Steel Company of Trinidad & Tobago. Some of the principal acquisitions since then include Thyssen Duisburg (Germany) in 1997, Inland Steel (USA) in 1998, Unimetal (France) in 1999, Sidex (Romania) and Annaba (Algeria) in 2001, Nova Hut (Czech Republic) in 2003, BH Steel (Bosnia), Balkan Steel (Macedonia), PHS (Poland) and Iscor (South Africa) in 2004, ISG (USA), Hunan Valin (China) and Kryvorizhstal (Ukraine) in 2005 and three Stelco Inc. subsidiaries (Canada) and Arcelor in 2006.
The mailing address and telephone number of Mittal Steel’s principal executive offices are:
Mittal Steel Company N.V.
Hofplein 20
3032 AC Rotterdam
The Netherlands
+31 10 217 8800
Mittal Steel class A common shares are listed and traded on the NYSE (symbol “MT”), are admitted to trading on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s regulated market and listed on the Official List of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange (symbol “MTL”), and are admitted to listing and trading on Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V. (symbol “MT”), Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A. (symbol “MTP”), Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV (symbol “MTBL”) and the Spanish exchanges (symbol “MTS”).
ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel have agreed in the merger agreement to merge as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, as described in this proxy statement/prospectus. Under the terms of the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, Mittal Steel will merge into ArcelorMittal, by way of absorption by ArcelorMittal of Mittal Steel and without liquidation of Mittal Steel. The combined company will be named “ArcelorMittal”.
The merger agreement, the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum are attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annexes A and B, respectively. ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel encourage you to read these documents in their entirety.
The merger will be governed by the terms and conditions following from the applicable provisions of Dutch and Luxembourg law, the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum. You will be asked to vote on the decision to merge as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum at the extraordinary
5
Table of Contents
general meeting of shareholders of Mittal Steel. Mittal Steel in its capacity as sole shareholder of ArcelorMittal will approve the decision to merge as such approval is required by Luxembourg law.
The merger constitutes the first step of the combination of Mittal Steel and Arcelor into a single legal entity governed by Luxembourg law. In the second and final step, ArcelorMittal (the surviving entity in the Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal merger) will merge into Arcelor and shareholders of ArcelorMittal will become shareholders of Arcelor, which will subsequently be renamed “ArcelorMittal”. See “The Merger—Two-Step Merger Process and Second-Step Merger” for further information with respect to the two-step merger process and the second-step merger.
Merger Consideration (see page 68)
In the merger, a holder of Mittal Steel class A common shares will receive one newly issued ArcelorMittal share for every Mittal Steel class A common share, which is referred to as the Class A Exchange Ratio.
A holder of Mittal Steel class B common shares will receive one newly issued ArcelorMittal share for every one Mittal Steel class B common share, which is referred to as the Class B Exchange Ratio.
Mittal Steel class A shares and Mittal Steel class B shares held in treasury by or for the account of Mittal Steel or ArcelorMittal will disappear (vervallen) in the merger pursuant to Dutch law. ArcelorMittal will not issue any shares in consideration of such Mittal Steel shares held in treasury by or for the account of Mittal Steel or ArcelorMittal.
The ArcelorMittal shares to be issued in the merger will be created under Luxembourg law and will have the rights as set forth in ArcelorMittal’s articles of association and Luxembourg law. No additional consideration in cash or in kind will be paid by ArcelorMittal to the shareholders of Mittal Steel in connection with the merger.
Former Mittal Steel shareholders will hold 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of ArcelorMittal after the merger.
Treatment of Stock Options (see page 69)
The merger proposal provides that each option to purchase Mittal Steel shares granted under employee and director stock plans of Mittal Steel will be converted into a right to acquire (or at ArcelorMittal’s option, subscribe) the same number of ArcelorMittal shares on the same terms and conditions as were applicable to such options prior to the effective time of the merger (subject to any changes necessary to reflect the effectiveness of the merger).
Recommendation of the Mittal Steel Board of Directors and Its Reasons for the Merger (see page 62)
Following discussions at a meeting held on April 27, 2007, the Mittal Steel Board of Directors unanimously decided, pursuant to written decisions dated May 2, 2007, to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. On June 25, 2007, all members of the Mittal Steel Board of Directors signed the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum. The Mittal Steel Board of Directors unanimously recommends that the Mittal Steel shareholders vote FOR the decision to merge as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum.
The Mittal Steel Board of Directors weighed the potential benefits, advantages and opportunities of a merger and the risks of not pursuing a transaction with ArcelorMittal against the risks and challenges inherent in the proposed merger. The Mittal Steel Board of Directors realized that there could be no assurance about future results, including results expected or considered in the factors weighed and reviewed by it. However, the Mittal Steel Board of Directors concluded that the potential benefits of effecting the merger with ArcelorMittal were significant and in particular that the merger would be a useful step towards the combination of Arcelor and Mittal Steel in a single legal entity governed by Luxembourg law and would enable Mittal Steel to comply as promptly as possible with part of the MOU undertakings.
Shareholders Entitled to Vote; Vote Required (see page 54)
You can vote at the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting if you own Mittal Steel shares at the close of business on August 21, 2007, which is referred to as the registration date. You may cast one vote for each Mittal Steel share that you own on the registration date.
6
Table of Contents
The decision to merge requires:
| • | if less than 50% of the outstanding Mittal Steel shares are represented in person or by proxy at the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the Mittal Steel shares represented in person or by proxy at the extraordinary general meeting, or |
| • | if at least 50% of the outstanding Mittal Steel shares are represented in person or by proxy at the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the Mittal Steel shares represented in person or by proxy at the extraordinary general meeting. |
Timetable for the Merger (see page 63)
The merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, each dated June 25, 2007, have been made publicly available on June 29, 2007. A copy of the merger proposal and a copy of the explanatory memorandum are attached to this prospectus as Annex B.
In order to complete the merger, Mittal Steel shareholders must adopt the decision to merge Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum. The extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of Mittal Steel that will vote on the proposal to merge Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal will be held on August 28, 2007, at 2 p.m. Amsterdam time, at Hotel Okura Amsterdam located at Ferdinand Bolstraat 333, 1072 LH Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
If the proposal to merge is adopted by the requisite majority at the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of Mittal Steel and all other conditions precedent are satisfied or waived, the merger is expected to be effected on or about September 3, 2007.
Upon effectiveness of the merger, holders of Mittal Steel shares will automatically receive newly issued ArcelorMittal shares in accordance with the applicable share exchange ratios and on the basis of their respective holdings as entered in the relevant Mittal Steel shareholder registry (register van aandeelhouders) or their respective securities accounts. Holders of Mittal Steel shares whose shares are registered directly in Mittal Steel’s Dutch or Luxembourg shareholder registry, will automatically receive newly issued ArcelorMittal shares through an entry in the relevant shareholder registry (registre des actionnaires) of ArcelorMittal. Holders of Mittal Steel shares whose shares are registered indirectly, that is through a book-entry system, in Mittal Steel’s Dutch or Luxembourg shareholder registry, will automatically receive newly issued ArcelorMittal shares through a credit to their respective securities accounts. Holders of Mittal Steel shares, whose shares are registered either directly or indirectly in Mittal Steel’s New York registry, will automatically be transferred to the ArcelorMittal New York shareholder registry.
Upon the day of effectiveness of the merger, which is expected to be on or about September, 3, 2007, the ArcelorMittal shares will be listed and traded on the Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the regulated market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, the Spanish exchanges and the NYSE.
Finally, the Mittal Steel class A common shares, which (as the Mittal Steel class B common shares) will automatically disappear in the merger, will no longer be listed and traded on the Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the regulated market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, the Spanish exchanges, and the NYSE as of the day of effectiveness of the merger. The last day of listing and trading of the Mittal Steel class A common shares at these exchanges is expected to be on or about August 31, 2007.
Subject to shareholder approval and the timing of completion of the necessary regulatory review processes, ArcelorMittal currently expects to complete the second-step merger of the combined entity into Arcelor in October or November of 2007.
Auditors’ Opinions (see page 63)
On June 25, 2007, Mazars S.A. (“Mazars Luxembourg”) issued its written report (un rapport écrit destiné aux actionnaires) to the Board of Directors of ArcelorMittal with respect to, among other things, the fairness of the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio, as required pursuant to Luxembourg law. Mazars Luxembourg opined, among other things, that, as of the date of its report and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, no fact has come to its attention that causes it to believe that the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio are not relevant and reasonable (pertinent et
7
Table of Contents
raisonnable). A copy of the report is attached to the merger proposal, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B, and both the merger proposal and the report are separately available at the offices of ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel and both the merger proposal and the report are also separately available at the Chamber of Commerce for Rotterdam, The Netherlands and at the Luxembourg Registry of Trade and Companies.
On June 25, 2007, Mazars Paardekooper Hoffman N.V. (“Mazars Netherlands”) issued its written auditors’ declaration (accountantsverklaring) and its written auditors’ report (accountantsverslag) to the Board of Directors of ArcelorMittal with respect to, among other things, the fairness of the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio, as required pursuant to Dutch law. Mazars Netherlands opined, among other things, that, as of the date of its auditors’ declaration and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio are reasonable (redelijk). A copy of the auditors’ declaration is attached to the merger proposal, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B, and each of the merger proposal, the auditors’ declaration and the auditors’ report are separately available at the offices of ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel and both the merger proposal and the auditors’ declaration are separately available at the Chamber of Commerce for Rotterdam, The Netherlands and at the Luxembourg Registry of Trade and Companies.
On June 25, 2007, AGN Daamen & van Sluis issued its written auditors’ declaration (accountantsverklaring) and its written auditors’ report (accountantsverslag) to the Board of Directors of Mittal Steel with respect to, among other things, the fairness of the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio, as required pursuant to Dutch law. AGN Daamen & van Sluis opined, among other things, that, as of the date of its auditors’ declaration and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio are reasonable (redelijk). A copy of the auditors’ declaration is attached to the merger proposal, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B, and each of the merger proposal, the auditors’ declaration and the auditors’ report are separately available at the offices of ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel and both the merger proposal and the auditors’ declaration are separately available at the Chamber of Commerce for Rotterdam, The Netherlands and at the Luxembourg Registry of Trade and Companies.
Directors and Management of the Combined Company After the Merger (see page 80)
As described in “Management”, the combined company will be governed by a Board of Directors and a Group Management Board. Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding, certain special governance mechanisms designed to promote the integration of Arcelor and Mittal Steel have been put into place for a period of three years ending on August 1, 2009 (the “Initial Term”). Arcelor and Mittal Steel agreed to change and unify their respective corporate governance structure and rules and to change the composition and operation of their respective Boards of Directors and Group Management Boards so that until the completion of the merger, the board composition and governance structure of both companies would be identical. In connection with the anticipated ultimate merger of ArcelorMittal into Arcelor, ArcelorMittal shall adopt a governance structure identical to Arcelor and Mittal Steel.
The Board of Directors of ArcelorMittal is in charge of the overall management of ArcelorMittal. The ArcelorMittal Board of Directors is responsible for the performance of all acts of administration necessary or useful in furtherance of the corporate purpose of ArcelorMittal, except those expressly reserved by Luxembourg law or by the articles of association of ArcelorMittal to the general meeting of shareholders. The members of the Board of Directors are appointed and dismissed by the general meeting of shareholders. The Group Management Board of ArcelorMittal is entrusted with the day-to-day management of ArcelorMittal. The members of the Group Management Board are appointed and dismissed by the Board of Directors. For a description of the composition of the Board of Directors and Group Management Board of ArcelorMittal post-merger, see “Management”.
Name and Executive Offices of the Combined Company After the Merger (see page 84)
The combined company shall be named “ArcelorMittal” upon effectiveness of the merger. As of and after the merger, the executive offices of the combined company will be located in Luxembourg.
Ownership of the Combined Company After the Merger (see page 98)
Based on the number of Mittal Steel shares issued on the date hereof, ArcelorMittal expects to issue between 1,277,408,250 and 1,419,342,499 ArcelorMittal shares to Mittal Steel shareholders in the merger.
8
Table of Contents
The exact number of ArcelorMittal shares to be issued will depend on any increase or decrease in the number of Mittal Steel treasury shares between the date hereof and the date of the extraordinary general meeting adopting the decision to merge Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal. Immediately following the effectiveness of the merger, former Mittal Steel shareholders will hold 100% of the issued and outstanding ArcelorMittal shares. In addition, ArcelorMittal may issue additional ArcelorMittal shares as a result of the future exercise of (former) Mittal Steel stock options, in an aggregate amount representing approximately 7.8 million ArcelorMittal shares.
Share Ownership of Directors and Senior Management (see page 92)
As of May 31, 2007, the aggregate beneficial share ownership of directors and senior management of Mittal Steel was 2,244,699 Mittal Steel class A common shares (excluding shares owned by the Significant shareholder and including options to acquire 272,136 Mittal Steel class A common shares that are exercisable within 60 days of May 31, 2007), being 0.15% of the total issued share capital of Mittal Steel. Excluding options to acquire Mittal Steel class A common shares, these 40 individuals beneficially owned 1,972,563 Mittal Steel class A common shares. As of May 31, 2007, the Significant shareholder beneficially owned 623,598,333 of Mittal Steel’s outstanding shares, representing 44.79% of Mittal Steel’s outstanding shares. Mittal Steel directors and members of senior management have indicated that they expect to vote for the decision to merge Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum. Mittal Steel directors and members of senior management will own the same number and percentages of shares in ArcelorMittal after the completion of the merger.
Admission to Trading and Listing of ArcelorMittal Shares; Delisting and Deregistration of Mittal Steel Class A Common Shares (see page 71)
Under the merger agreement, ArcelorMittal is required to have the admission to trading of ArcelorMittal shares issued in the merger approved by the Luxembourg authorities, and to have the application for trading and listing of these shares on the regulated market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the Spanish exchanges and the NYSE (subject to official notice of issuance) approved by these respective exchanges. Upon effectiveness of the merger, the Mittal Steel class A common shares will no longer be listed on the NYSE and will be deregistered under the Exchange Act, and Mittal Steel class A common shares will no longer be admitted to trading and will be delisted from Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the Spanish exchanges and will no longer be admitted to trading on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s regulated market and no longer be listed on the Official List of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange.
Dissenters’ Rights in the Merger (see page 66)
Mittal Steel shareholders will not have any appraisal or dissenters’ rights under Dutch law or under Mittal Steel’s articles of association in connection with the merger, and neither Mittal Steel nor ArcelorMittal will independently provide Mittal Steel shareholders with any such rights.
Conditions to Effectiveness of the Merger (see page 71)
The obligations of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal to complete the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver, where legally permissible, of the following conditions:
| • | the decision to merge as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum will have been adopted by the requisite affirmative vote of the shareholders of Mittal Steel; |
| • | the following will have been approved by the vote of the sole shareholder of ArcelorMittal: |
| • | the decision to merge as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum; |
| • | the decision to issue the ArcelorMittal shares in the merger; |
| • | the decision to cancel the ArcelorMittal shares that will be transferred by Mittal Steel to ArcelorMittal upon effectiveness of the merger; |
| • | the decision to issue ArcelorMittal stock options in the merger; |
| • | the decision to authorize the Board of Directors of ArcelorMittal to issue ArcelorMittal shares within the limits of the authorized share capital for delivery upon exercise or conversion, as applicable, of ArcelorMittal stock options or other equity-based awards granted under any ArcelorMittal employee incentive or benefit plan; |
9
Table of Contents
| • | the European prospectus will have been approved by the Luxembourg Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier, or the CSSF, and a copy of that approval will have been notified by the CSSF to the competent securities regulator in Belgium, France, The Netherlands, Spain and any other relevant competent securities regulator in the European Union; |
| • | the F-4 Registration Statement, of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, will have been declared effective by the SEC under the Securities Act and no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the F-4 Registration Statement will be in effect and no proceedings for such purpose will be pending before, or threatened by, the SEC; |
| • | the ArcelorMittal shares will have been (provisionally) admitted to trading and listing on the regulated market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the Spanish exchanges and the NYSE (subject to official notice of issuance); |
| • | the receipt of a satisfactory tax ruling from the Dutch tax authorities regarding the Dutch corporate income tax and Dutch dividend withholding tax consequences of the merger for Mittal Steel; |
| • | the creditors’ waiting period pursuant to Dutch law will have expired, and any opposition formed by any creditors of ArcelorMittal or Mittal Steel will have been resolved; |
| • | there will be no action, litigation or proceeding by any court or person, instituted or pending, or statute, rule, regulation, injunction, order or decree by any court or person issued or deemed to be applicable to the merger, that seeks to prohibit or restrain the merger or seeks a divestiture of any Mittal Steel shares or ArcelorMittal shares (including any shares issued in the merger) or limitation on the ownership rights of ArcelorMittal over the assets and liabilities of Mittal Steel that are transferred to ArcelorMittal upon effectiveness of the merger that would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect, as such concept is defined in the merger agreement; and |
| • | the articles of association of ArcelorMittal shall be amended to the effect that each of the issued shares in the capital of ArcelorMittal shall have a par value of €0.01 (one euro cent) each. |
Regulatory Matters (see page 67)
The merger may be subject to various regulatory requirements of other municipal, state, federal and foreign governmental agencies and authorities, including filings with competition authorities in certain jurisdictions and those relating to the offer and sale of securities. Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal are continuing to evaluate and comply in all material respects with these requirements, as appropriate, and do not anticipate that they will hinder, delay or restrict the effectiveness of the merger.
Termination of the Merger Agreement (see page 72)
The merger agreement may be terminated and the merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the effective time of the merger by the mutual written consent of ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel. If any of the conditions precedent to the effectiveness of the merger have not been satisfied or waived, where legally permissible, by December 31, 2007, either party may terminate the merger agreement upon written notice to the other party; provided that the right to terminate the merger agreement will not be available to the party whose failure to fulfill any condition precedent under the merger agreement has been the cause of, or resulted in, the failure of the satisfaction of that condition precedent to occur on or before that date. If no such written notice is sent, the merger agreement will remain in full force and the parties may agree to either consider such condition precedent waived or amend the merger agreement.
The following is a summary. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding tax consequences of the merger and of holding and disposing of ArcelorMittal shares.
U.S. Taxation
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the merger between Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal will qualify as a tax-free reorganization. Accordingly, a U.S. Holder (as defined under “Taxation–United States Taxation”), will not recognize any gain or loss in connection with the exchange of Mittal Steel shares for ArcelorMittal shares in the merger. A U.S. Holder will have a tax basis in the ArcelorMittal shares received equal to the tax basis of the Mittal Steel shares surrendered. A U.S. Holder will have a holding period in the ArcelorMittal shares equal to the holding period of the Mittal Steel shares surrendered in the merger.
10
Table of Contents
Luxembourg Taxation
Capital gains on Mittal Steel shares realized by Luxembourg Holders (as defined under “Taxation–Luxembourg Taxation”) will not be deemed realized under Luxembourg law provided such Luxembourg Holders opt for roll-over relief and do not receive a cash balance payment exceeding 10% of the par value of the ArcelorMittal shares they receive in exchange for their Mittal Steel shares as provided by Articles 22 bis and 102 (10) of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law. If a capital gain is realized, an individual Luxembourg Holder shall only be taxable if the merger takes place within six months following the acquisition by the Luxembourg Holder of its Mittal Steel shares, or if the relevant holder holds more than 10% of the shares. If the holder is a Luxembourg company, such capital gain on Mittal Steel shares shall only be taxable if such holder does not benefit from the full exemption set forth in Article 166 of the Luxembourg Income Tax Law and the Grand Ducal Decree of December 21, 2001, as amended.
Dutch Taxation
Capital gains or other benefits derived or deemed to be derived in connection with the merger are, in general, taxable. Roll-over relief should be available for certain shareholders. Capital gains or other benefits derived in connection with the merger are as such not subject to Dutch income tax if the holder is an individual and the Mittal Steel shares are recognized as investment assets for the calculation of his/her income from savings and investments (belastbaar inkomen uit sparen en beleggen).
Accounting Treatment (see page 66)
For accounting purposes, the merger of Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal shall be considered a combination of entities under common control as of January 1, 2007. All recorded assets and liabilities of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal shall be carried forward at their historical book values, and the income of ArcelorMittal shall include the income of Mittal Steel as of January 1, 2007.
For statutory reporting purposes in The Netherlands, the final accounting year of Mittal Steel shall end on December 31, 2006.
Comparison of Rights of Mittal Steel Shareholders and ArcelorMittal Shareholders (see page 106)
As a result of the merger, Mittal Steel shares will be automatically exchanged for ArcelorMittal shares. Because Mittal Steel is a naamloze vennootschap organized under the laws of The Netherlands and ArcelorMittal is a société anonyme organized under the laws of Luxembourg, there are material differences between the rights of Mittal Steel shareholders and ArcelorMittal shareholders.
The following summarizes certain material differences between the rights of shareholders under Luxembourg and Dutch law and ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel’s articles of association. For a more detailed description of these and other differences, see “Comparison of Rights of Mittal Steel Shareholders and ArcelorMittal Shareholders”.
| • | Shareholder Proposals. Under Mittal Steel’s articles of association and Dutch law, shareholders representing at least 1% of the issued share capital or a market value of at least €50,000,000 may request to include items on the agenda of a shareholders’ meeting. The items are included in the agenda unless this would be detrimental to vital interests of Mittal Steel. Under ArcelorMittal’s articles of association and Luxembourg law, shareholders representing at least 10% of the issued share capital may request that additional items be added to the agenda of a general meeting of shareholders. |
| • | Major Transactions. Under Mittal Steel’s articles of association and Dutch law, shareholder approval is required for decisions involving “a significant change in the identity or character of the company”. Under ArcelorMittal’s articles of association and Luxembourg law, no shareholder approval is required for major acquisitions or disposals. |
| • | Dividends. Under Mittal Steel’s articles of association, the Board of Directors resolves upon reservation of profits and the remaining balance shall be distributed to shareholders subject to certain limitations. In addition, the Board of Directors may resolve to pay an interim dividend. Under ArcelorMittal’s articles of association, the general meeting of shareholders resolves upon reservation of profits and the remaining balance may be distributed to shareholders subject to certain limitations. The Board of Directors may, however, resolve to pay an interim dividend. |
11
Table of Contents
PRESENTATION OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION
Financial Information
This proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference the audited consolidated financial statements of Mittal Steel Company N.V. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, and the consolidated statements of income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, which we refer to as the Mittal Steel Consolidated Financial Statements, and includes selected consolidated financial information of Mittal Steel for the dates and periods presented in the Mittal Steel Consolidated Financial Statements and as of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003.
All of the financial statements included in this proxy statement/prospectus have been prepared based on International Financial Reporting Standards as endorsed by the European Union (“IFRS”) except where indicated. IFRS as endorsed by the European Union differs in certain respects from IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). Mittal Steel has, however, determined that the financial information as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 would not be different had it applied IFRS as issued by the IASB. The financial information in this proxy statement/prospectus, or incorporated by reference herein, also includes a reconciliation of certain items from IFRS to the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). IFRS differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP.
Mittal Steel’s significant acquisitions in 2004, 2005 and 2006, including in particular those of Arcelor, ISG and Kryvorizhstal, have been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, with Mittal Steel as the acquiring entity in accordance with IFRS 3 (“Business Combinations”). Inter-company transactions have been eliminated in financial consolidation.
Because ArcelorMittal had no previous operating history, material assets or liabilities, the financial information for ArcelorMittal is not presented in this proxy statement/prospectus and after effectiveness of the merger, the financial information for ArcelorMittal will be the same as that of Mittal Steel prior to the merger.
The financial information and certain other information presented in a number of tables in this proxy statement/prospectus have been rounded to the nearest whole number or the nearest decimal. Therefore, the sum of the numbers in a column may not conform exactly to the total figure given for that column. In addition, certain percentages presented in the tables in this proxy statement/prospectus reflect calculations based upon the underlying information prior to rounding and, accordingly, may not conform exactly to the percentages that would be derived if the relevant calculations were based upon the rounded numbers.
In this document, references to “$”, “dollars” or “U.S. dollars” are to United States dollars; “euro”, “euros”, “EUR” or “€” are to the currency of the European Union member states participating in the European Monetary Union; and “real”, “reais” or “R$” are to Brazilian reais, the official currency of Brazil.
Market Information
This proxy statement/prospectus includes or incorporates by reference industry data and projections about Mittal Steel’s and ArcelorMittal’s markets obtained from industry surveys, market research, publicly available information and industry publications. Statements on Mittal Steel’s competitive position contained in this proxy statement/prospectus are based primarily on public sources including, but not limited to, publications of the International Iron and Steel Institute (IISI). Industry publications generally state that the information they contain has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable and that the projections they contain are based on a number of significant assumptions. In addition, in many cases Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal have made statements in this proxy statement/prospectus regarding their industry and their position in the industry based on internal surveys, industry forecasts, market research and their own experience.
Internet Sites
Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal maintain an Internet site: www.arcelormittal.com. Information contained in or otherwise accessible through this Internet site is not a part of this proxy statement/prospectus unless otherwise incorporated by reference in this prospectus, as described in “Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference”. All references in this prospectus to Mittal Steel’s and ArcelorMittal’s Internet site are inactive textual references to the URL and are for your information only.
12
Table of Contents
Recent Developments
Various Matters
In January 2007, Mittal Steel sold Travi e Profilati di Pallanzeno (“TPP”) and its 49.9% stake in San Zeno Acciai to Duferco for an enterprise value of €117 million. Such divestment was pursuant to a commitment made to the European Commission in connection with Mittal Steel’s acquisition of Arcelor. In 2006, TPP generated sales of approximately €190 million with an annual production of approximately 500,000 tonnes of long carbon steel products.
On January 19, 2007, Mittal Steel announced that it had agreed to sell Huta Bankowa Spólka z.o.o. (“Huta Bankowa”) to Alchemia SA Capital Group for an enterprise value of approximately €37 million (approximately $48 million). Such divestment was pursuant to a commitment made to the European Commission in connection with Mittal Steel’s acquisition of Arcelor. Huta Bankowa, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mittal Steel, is located in Dabrowa Gornicza in southern Poland. The transaction is expected to close in 2007, subject to European Commission approval and applicable antitrust clearances.
On February 14, 2007, Mittal Steel signed a joint venture agreement with the Bin Jarallah Group of companies for the design and construction of a seamless tube mill in Saudi Arabia. This facility will be located in Jubail Industrial City, north of Al Jubail on the Persian Gulf. The mill will have a capacity of 500,000 tonnes per year. Construction is planned to commence at the end of the first quarter of 2008 and to be completed by the fourth quarter of 2009. Mittal Steel will hold a 51% interest in the company established for this project, with the Bin Jarallah Group holding the remaining 49%.
On February 23, 2007, Mittal Steel announced that it had signed agreements with the State of Senegal in West Africa to develop iron ore mines in the Faleme region of South East Senegal. The project is expected to require an investment of approximately $2.2 billion. The project is an integrated mining project that will encompass the development of the mine, the building of a new port near Dakar and the development of approximately 750 kilometers of rail infrastructure to link the mine with the port. Mittal Steel expects the mine to produce approximately 750 million tonnes of iron ore. Mittal Steel expects to commence production of the mines in 2011. The agreements will become effective upon the fulfillment of certain conditions by the State of Senegal.
On March 2, 2007, Mittal Steel was included in the AEX index and the FTSE4Good Index Europe indexes. On September 18, 2006, Mittal Steel was included in the CAC 40 index.
On March 2, 2007, Mittal Steel announced that 385,340,210 Mittal Steel class B common shares owned by Mittal Investments S.à.r.l. had been converted into 385,340,210 Mittal Steel class A common shares. This conversion had no impact on the total number of shares (1,392,308,490 shares, consisting of 1,320,158,490 class A common shares and 72,150,000 class B common shares).
On March 5, 2007, Mittal Steel sold Stahlwerk Thüringen GmbH (“SWT”) to Grupo Alfonso Gallardo for an enterprise value of €591 million (approximately $768 million). Such divestment was pursuant to a commitment made to the European Commission in connection with Mittal Steel’s acquisition of Arcelor. SWT, which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mittal Steel, is located at Unterwellenborn, Thüringen, Germany. In 2005, SWT’s sales were approximately €400 million. SWT employs approximately 700 people and produces steel sections of up to 550 millimeters in width used in building and construction.
On March 16, 2007, Mittal Steel announced that it was investing in a new steel service center in Krakow, Poland. Incorporating two de-coiling lines and a slitting line, this facility will have a processing capacity of 450,000 tons per year and will strengthen Mittal Steel’s network of steel service centers in Poland. Operation is expected to commence in the fall of 2007.
On March 16, 2007, Mittal Steel announced that it had signed a definitive agreement with Noble International, Ltd. (“Noble”) for the combination of their laser-welded tailored blanks businesses. In exchange for its laser-welded blanks business in western and eastern Europe, China, India and the United States, Mittal Steel will receive $300 million from Noble, including $131,250,000 in a combination of cash, a Noble note and the assumption of certain financial obligations, and 9,375,000 shares of Noble common stock. Mittal Steel and Noble are also seeking to include in the transaction the tailored blanks business of Powerlasers, a unit of Dofasco, for additional consideration of approximately $50 million, subject to the approval of the trustees of Dofasco. Upon completion of the transaction, which is expected to occur in June 2007, Mittal Steel will become the largest shareholder of Noble, with approximately 40% of its issued and outstanding common shares and four of the nine seats on its Board of Directors.
13
Table of Contents
On April 23, 2007, Mittal Steel announced that it had finalized the acquisition of Sicartsa, a Mexican integrated steel producer, from Grupo Villacero for an enterprise value of approximately $1.4 billion. Sicartsa, with production facilities in Mexico and Texas, is a fully-integrated producer of long steel, with an annual production capacity of approximately 2.7 million tonnes. Sicartsa’s wholly-owned mine is linked directly to the plant via a slurry pipeline. In addition to a fully-integrated steel-making facility at Lázaro Cárdenas, next to Mittal Steel’s Lázaro Cárdenas site, the acquisition included Metaver, a mini-mill, Sibasa and Camsa, two rolling mills in Celaya, Guanajuato (Sibasa) and Tultitlán in the state of Mexico, as well as Border Steel, a mini-mill in the state of Texas in the United States.
Dofasco
On January 26, 2006, Mittal Steel and ThyssenKrupp AG entered into a letter agreement which provided that if Mittal Steel was successful in its tender offer for Arcelor and was able to exert management control “with the ability to sell Dofasco”, Mittal Steel would cause Arcelor to sell Dofasco to ThyssenKrupp. During March and April 2006, Arcelor acquired 100% of the shares of Dofasco. On April 3, 2006, Arcelor transferred 89% of the shares of Dofasco to the Strategic Steel Stichting (“S3”), an independent foundation under Dutch law, thereby removing Arcelor’s ability to sell or otherwise dispose of such shares without S3’s consent. On June 25, 2006, Mittal Steel and Arcelor agreed to the terms of a recommended offer, pursuant to which Mittal Steel has acquired approximately 94% of the share capital of Arcelor.
On August 1, 2006, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced that it had concluded that the acquisition by Mittal Steel of Arcelor was likely to lessen substantially competition in the market for tin mill products in the eastern United States and filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. a consent decree that Mittal Steel had previously signed with the DOJ on May 11, 2006. The consent decree required the divestiture of Dofasco or, if Mittal Steel were unable to sell Dofasco, the divestiture of either Mittal Steel’s Sparrows Point facility in Maryland or Mittal Steel’s Weirton facility in West Virginia. The consent decree provided that the DOJ in its sole discretion would choose which plant would be sold. The consent decree also included a Hold Separate Stipulation and Order, which provided that Dofasco would be maintained as a separate business, independent of the other businesses of Mittal Steel and Arcelor, until Dofasco was divested or the DOJ made its selection of the alternative plant to be divested.
After the consent decree was filed in court, the boards of both Mittal Steel and Arcelor requested the directors of S3 to dissolve the foundation in order to allow the sale of Dofasco. On November 10, 2006, however, S3’s directors unanimously decided not to dissolve the foundation and to retain the Dofasco shares, thereby continuing to prevent their sale.
On December 22, 2006, ThyssenKrupp initiated summary legal proceedings against Mittal Steel in the District Court in Rotterdam alleging that Mittal Steel had breached the letter agreement by failing to cause Arcelor to initiate litigation against S3 to force S3 to transfer the Dofasco shares to Arcelor so as to permit their sale to ThyssenKrupp. The suit sought, among other things, a court order directing Mittal Steel to cause Arcelor to commence summary proceedings in the Dutch courts to force S3 to return the Dofasco shares to Arcelor. On January 23, 2007, the District Court in Rotterdam denied ThyssenKrupp’s petition for an order. The time for ThyssenKrupp to appeal the Rotterdam District Court’s order has expired.
On February 20, 2007, the DOJ informed Mittal Steel that the DOJ had selected the Sparrows Point steel mill located near Baltimore, Maryland for divestiture under the consent decree filed by the DOJ in August 2006. According to the decree, any such divestiture must take place within 90 days from February 20, 2007, subject to possible extensions by the DOJ. The DOJ has extended the divestiture deadline by a total of 45 days. As a result, the current deadline for the divestiture is July 5, 2007. The selection of Sparrows Point by the DOJ ended the period during which Mittal Steel must hold Dofasco separate from its operations.
Brazilian Subsidiaries
On September 25, 2006, the Comissão de Valores Mobiliáros (the “CVM”), the Brazilian securities regulator, ruled that, as a result of Mittal Steel’s acquisition of Arcelor, Mittal Steel was required to carry out a public offer to acquire all the outstanding shares in Arcelor Brasil not owned by Arcelor or any other affiliate of Mittal Steel. Pursuant to the ruling, the value to be offered to Arcelor Brasil’s shareholders is to be determined on the basis of the value of the part of the overall consideration paid for Arcelor by Mittal Steel that was attributable to Arcelor Brasil. On April 17, 2007, the CVM granted registration of the offer, which opened on April 27, 2007 and closed on June 4, 2007. The consideration to be offered per Arcelor Brasil share was R$11.70 in cash and
14
Table of Contents
0.3568 Mittal Steel class A common shares, subject to certain adjustments. Tendering Arcelor Brasil shareholders could also accept an all-cash option, pursuant to which they would receive cash in an amount equal to the value of the cash and share consideration described above, calculated in the manner set forth in the offering documents.
On June 5, 2007, Mittal Steel publicly announced the results of the tender offer. In the aggregate, Mittal Steel acquired 29.5% of the total share capital and 89.7% of the free float of Arcelor Brasil as of June 5, 2007, thereby increasing its current 67.1% shareholding in Arcelor Brasil to 96.6%. Mittal Steel paid for the shares with $3.7 billion in cash and approximately 27.0 million Mittal Steel class A common shares, representing a total consideration of $5.4 billion. As required by Brazilian regulations, beginning on June 5, 2007 and ending at the latest on September 4, 2007, the remaining shareholders in Arcelor Brasil may sell their shares to Mittal Steel for R$53.89 per share (the same price offered to the Arcelor Brasil shareholders accepting the cash option of the offer) as adjusted pursuant to applicable law. As soon as Mittal Steel receives from the CVM confirmation that Arcelor Brasil’s registration as a listed company has been cancelled, Mittal Steel will cause a general Arcelor Brasil shareholders’ meeting to be held in order to approve the redemption of the remaining shares. The redemption price will be equal to R$53.89 per share. Mittal Steel therefore expects that it will subsequently acquire the 21.9 million Arcelor Brasil shares that remained outstanding after the closing of the tender offer, which are valued at approximately $0.6 billion.
The acquisitions and divestitures referenced above, other than Arcelor Brasil, were not individually or in the aggregate significant to Mittal Steel as defined in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X.
15
Table of Contents
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR MITTAL STEEL
The following tables present selected consolidated financial information of Mittal Steel as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, which has been prepared in accordance with IFRS. This selected consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with the Mittal Steel Consolidated Financial Statements, including the notes thereto.
IFRS Basis
| Statement of Income Data | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| (Amounts in $ millions except per share data and percentages) | 2004(6) | 2005(6) | 2006 | |||||||||
| Sales(1) |
$ | 20,612 | $ | 28,132 | $58,870 | |||||||
| Cost of sales (including depreciation and amortization)(2) |
14,422 | 22,341 | 48,411 | |||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative |
676 | 1,062 | 2,960 | |||||||||
| Operating income |
5,514 | 4,729 | 7,499 | |||||||||
| Operating income as percentage of Sales |
26.8 | % | 16.8 | % | 12.7 | % | ||||||
| Other income – net |
1,143 | 214 | 49 | |||||||||
| Income from equity method investments |
149 | 86 | 301 | |||||||||
| Financing costs – net |
(214 | ) | (353 | ) | (654 | ) | ||||||
| Income before taxes |
6,592 | 4,676 | 7,195 | |||||||||
| Net income (including minority interest) |
5,625 | 3,795 | 6,086 | |||||||||
| Basic earnings per common share(3) |
$8.10 | $4.80 | $5.29 | |||||||||
| Diluted earnings per common share(3) |
$8.10 | $4.79 | $5.28 | |||||||||
| Dividends declared per share(4) |
— | $0.30 | $0.50 | |||||||||
| Balance Sheet Data | As of December 31, | |||||||||||
| (Amounts in $ millions except share data) | 2004(6) | 2005(6) | 2006 | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, including short-term investments and restricted cash |
$ | 2,634 | $ | 2,149 | $ | 6,146 | ||||||
| Property, plant and equipment |
11,058 | 19,045 | 54,696 | |||||||||
| Total assets |
21,692 | 33,867 | 112,166 | |||||||||
| Payable to banks and current portion of long-term debt |
341 | 334 | 4,922 | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, net of current portion |
1,639 | 7,974 | 21,645 | |||||||||
| Net assets |
11,079 | 15,457 | 50,191 | |||||||||
| Basic weighted average common shares outstanding (millions) |
643 | 687 | 988 | |||||||||
| Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding (millions) |
643 | 689 | 990 | |||||||||
| Other Data | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| (Amounts in $ millions except volume data) | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities |
$4,300 | $3,874 | $7,122 | |||||||||
| Net cash (used in) investing activities |
(656 | ) | (7,512 | ) | (8,576 | ) | ||||||
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(2,118 | ) | 3,349 | 5,445 | ||||||||
| Total production of crude steel (thousands of tonnes) |
39,362 | 48,916 | 85,620 | |||||||||
| Total shipments of steel products (thousands of tonnes)(5) |
35,067 | 44,614 | 78,950 | |||||||||
| (1) | Including $2,235 million in 2004, $2,339 million in 2005 and $3,847 million in 2006 of sales to related parties (see Note 12 to the Mittal Steel Consolidated Financial Statements). |
| (2) | Including depreciation and amortization of $734 million in 2004, $1,113 million in 2005 and $2,296 million in 2006. |
| (3) | Earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income attributable to equity holders of Mittal Steel Company N.V. by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented considering retroactively the shares issued by Mittal Steel in connection with the acquisition of LNM Holdings. |
| (4) | This does not include the dividends declared by LNM Holdings to its shareholder prior to its acquisition by Ispat International. |
| (5) | Shipment volumes of steel products for the operations of Arcelor and its subsidiaries includes inter-company sales, while shipment volumes of steel products for the operations of Mittal Steel and its subsidiaries do not include inter-company sales. |
16
Table of Contents
| (6) | The 2005 comparative information has been adjusted retrospectively for the adoption of International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”) 4, which occurred as of January 1, 2006 (see Note 1 to the Mittal Steel Consolidated Financial Statements), as well as the finalization of purchase price allocations relating to ISG and Mittal Steel Kryviy Rih (see Note 3 to the Mittal Steel Consolidated Financial Statements). |
US GAAP Basis
The following tables present selected consolidated financial information of Mittal Steel as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006. Such selected financial information has been prepared in accordance with US GAAP.
| Statement of Income Data | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| (Amounts in $ millions except per share data and percentages) | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
| Sales(4) |
$ | 7,080 | $9,567 | $ | 22,197 | $ | 28,132 | $58,870 | ||||||||||
| Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) |
5,752 | 7,568 | 14,694 | 21,495 | 46,072 | |||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization |
266 | 331 | 553 | 829 | 1,993 | |||||||||||||
| Selling, general and administrative |
360 | 369 | 804 | 1,062 | 2,984 | |||||||||||||
| Operating income |
702 | 1,299 | 6,146 | 4,746 | 7,821 | |||||||||||||
| Operating income as percentage of Sales |
9.9 | % | 13.6 | % | 27.7 | % | 16.9 | % | 13.3 | % | ||||||||
| Other income – net |
32 | 70 | 128 | 77 | 52 | |||||||||||||
| Income from equity method investments |
111 | 162 | 66 | 69 | 301 | |||||||||||||
| Financing costs – net |
(207 | ) | (131 | ) | (207 | ) | (189 | ) | (564 | ) | ||||||||
| Income before taxes and minority interest |
638 | 1,400 | 6,133 | 4,703 | 7,610 | |||||||||||||
| Net income |
595 | 1,182 | 4,701 | 3,365 | 5,405 | |||||||||||||
| Basic earnings per common share(1) |
$0.92 | $1.83 | $7.31 | $4.90 | $5.47 | |||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings per common share(1) |
$0.92 | $1.83 | $7.31 | $4.89 | $5.46 | |||||||||||||
| Dividends declared per share(2) |
— | — | — | $0.30 | $0.50 | |||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet Data | As of December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| (Amounts in $ millions except share data) | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, including short-term investments and restricted cash |
$417 | $900 | $2,634 | $2,149 | $6,146 | |||||||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment |
4,094 | 4,654 | 7,562 | 15,539 | 49,809 | |||||||||||||
| Total assets |
7,909 | 10,137 | 19,153 | 31,042 | 105,686 | |||||||||||||
| Payable to banks and current portion of long-term debt |
546 | 780 | 341 | 334 | 4,919 | |||||||||||||
| Long-term debt (including affiliates)(3) |
2,187 | 2,287 | 1,639 | 7,974 | 21,576 | |||||||||||||
| Net assets |
1,442 | 2,561 | 5,846 | 10,150 | 36,879 | |||||||||||||
| Basic weighted average common shares outstanding (millions) |
648 | 647 | 643 | 687 | 988 | |||||||||||||
| (1) | Earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented considering retroactively the shares issued by Mittal Steel in connection with the acquisition of LNM Holdings. |
| (2) | This does not include the dividends declared by LNM Holdings to its shareholder prior to its acquisition by Ispat International. |
| (3) | Includes loans outstanding from the Significant shareholder of $40 million and $94 million as of December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively. |
| (4) | Including $507 million in 2002, $561 million in 2003, $2,235 million in 2004, $2,339 million in 2005 and $3,847 million in 2006 of sales to related parties. |
17
Table of Contents
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF ArcelorMittal AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet and unaudited pro forma condensed combined income statement (“Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information”) of ArcelorMittal give effect to the following transactions as if they occurred on January 1, 2006 for the pro forma condensed combined statement of income and as if they occurred on December 31, 2006 for the pro forma condensed combined balance sheet:
| • | the acquisition by Mittal Steel of 94.2% of the share capital (on a diluted basis) of Arcelor S.A. (“Arcelor”) and all of the outstanding OCEANEs (convertible bonds) of Arcelor (collectively, the “Arcelor Acquisition”) (the acquisition is reflected in the historical balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 of Mittal Steel); |
| • | the tender offer by Mittal Steel for the acquisition of all outstanding minority interests in Arcelor Brasil S.A. (“Arcelor Brasil”), a subsidiary of Arcelor; |
| • | the $590 million share buy back program announced on April 2, 2007 and the 27 million share buy back program announced on June 12, 2007; |
| • | the merger of Mittal Steel Company N.V. (“Mittal Steel”) into ArcelorMittal; and |
| • | the proposed merger of ArcelorMittal (the surviving entity in the Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal merger) into Arcelor, which will subsequently be renamed “ArcelorMittal”. |
On August 1, 2006, Mittal Steel acquired 91.9% of the share capital of Arcelor (on a diluted basis). Through subsequent transactions Mittal Steel has increased its ownership to 94.2% which includes the issued and outstanding shares of Arcelor and all of Arcelor’s convertible bonds, which were acquired in exchange for approximately 680 million Mittal Steel class A common shares and approximately €8.0 billion ($10.2 billion) in cash. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, which requires that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Arcelor are reflected in the historical consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006. Accordingly, no pro forma adjustments are recorded in the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet related to this acquisition. The results of operations for Arcelor have been included in the consolidated income statement of Mittal Steel since the date of acquisition, August 1, 2006. For purposes of preparing the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Income Statement, the Arcelor historical consolidated income statement for the period from January 1, 2006 through July 31, 2006 has been translated from euros into U.S. dollars using an average exchange rate of €1 to $1.2343.
On September 25, 2006, the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (the “CVM”), the Brazilian securities regulator, ruled that, as a result of Mittal Steel’s acquisition of Arcelor, Mittal Steel was required to carry out a public offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares in Arcelor Brasil not owned by Arcelor or any other affiliate of Mittal Steel. Pursuant to the ruling, the value to be offered to Arcelor Brasil’s shareholders is to be determined on the basis of the value of the part of the overall consideration paid for Arcelor by Mittal Steel that was attributable to Arcelor Brasil. On April 17, 2007, the CVM granted registration of the offer, which opened on April 27, 2007 and closed on June 4, 2007. The consideration to be offered per Arcelor Brasil share was R$11.70 in cash and 0.3568 Mittal Steel class A common shares, subject to certain adjustments. Tendering Arcelor Brasil shareholders could also accept an all-cash option, pursuant to which they would receive cash in an amount equal to the value of the cash and share consideration described above, calculated in the manner set forth in the offering documents.
As of June 4, 2007, 191.3 million Arcelor Brasil shares had been tendered, representing 29.5% of the total Arcelor Brasil share capital and 89.7% of the free float of Arcelor Brasil. Of the total number of shares tendered 39.6% were tendered pursuant to the Mixed Offer and 60.4% pursuant to the Cash Offer. The total value offered per Arcelor Brasil share is €21.05 ($28.31). The amount of cash to be paid by Mittal Steel will be approximately €3.2 billion ($4.3 billion). The number of Mittal Steel class A common shares issued was approximately 27 million shares, representing 2% of the share capital of Mittal Steel on a diluted basis. The sell-out right for shareholders who decided not to tender commenced on June 5, 2007 and will end no later than on September 4, 2007 (inclusive), as required by regulations of the CVM. ArcelorMittal intends to redeem all of the remaining shares through a tender squeeze-out process as permitted by Brazilian regulations, given that the free float following the Offer will represent less than 5% of the total share capital of Arcelor Brasil. The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information assumes that Mittal Steel will acquire 100% of the outstanding minority interests pursuant to the offer described above.
18
Table of Contents
On April 2, 2007, Mittal Steel announced the commencement of a share buy-back program to repurchase up to a maximum aggregate amount of $590 million of its class A common shares. The share buy-back program will end at the earliest of (i) December 31, 2007, (ii) the moment on which the aggregate value of class A common shares repurchased by Mittal Steel since the start of this share buy-back program reaches $590 million, or (iii) the moment on which Mittal Steel and its subsidiaries hold 10% of the total number of the then-issued class A and class B common shares.
On June 12, 2007, Mittal Steel announced its intention to start a share buy-back program for up to a maximum of 27 million class A common shares, immediately following the completion of the $590 million share buy-back program summarized above. This new share buy-back program is designed to offset the issuance of shares as partial consideration for the acquisition of the outstanding minority interests in Arcelor Brasil. All necessary corporate actions will be taken at the level of ArcelorMittal in order to allow the continuation by ArcelorMittal of the Mittal Steel share buy-back programs (the ongoing $590 million program and the announced subsequent 27 million share program) following effectiveness of the merger.
In the Memorandum of Understanding of June 25, 2006 (the “MOU”), Mittal Steel agreed that it would merge into Arcelor as soon as practicable following completion of its revised offer for Arcelor, and that the combined entity would be incorporated, domiciled and headquartered in Luxembourg. Following discussions at a meeting held on April 27, 2007, the Mittal Steel Board of Directors decided, pursuant to written decisions dated May 2, 2007, to organize a two-step process pursuant to which Mittal Steel would first be merged into ArcelorMittal, which would subsequently be merged into Arcelor as the ultimate surviving entity. The objective of the two-step process is to ensure the earliest possible compliance with the undertakings made by Mittal Steel in the context of its revised offer for Arcelor (as reflected in the MOU).
As a first step in a two-step merger process to combine Mittal Steel and Arcelor in a single legal entity governed by Luxembourg law, on May 2, 2007, Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal entered into a merger agreement which provides that, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, Mittal Steel will merge into ArcelorMittal, by way of absorption by ArcelorMittal of Mittal Steel and without liquidation of Mittal Steel. The combined company will be named “ArcelorMittal”.
ArcelorMittal was incorporated on August 13, 2004 under the name Verger Investments S.A. It has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mittal Steel since April 24, 2007 and was renamed “ArcelorMittal” on April 26, 2007. ArcelorMittal has not conducted operations to date and will not have conducted any operations prior to the merger. Prior to the merger, ArcelorMittal did not have any assets, liabilities (contingent or otherwise) or commitments, other than assets consisting of an immaterial amount of cash. It is being used to facilitate the two-step merger process described above.
For accounting purposes, the merger of Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal shall be considered a combination of entities under common control. All recorded assets and liabilities of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal shall be carried forward at their historical book values, and the income of ArcelorMittal shall include the income of Mittal Steel for all periods presented. The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information presents ArcelorMittal, the combined company, as if the transaction occurred on January 1, 2006 and it is the legal entity for all periods presented. The assumptions and adjustments to Mittal Steel’s historical shareholders’ equity are described in Note 5 of the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information.
In the second-step merger, ArcelorMittal (the surviving entity in the Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal merger) will merge into Arcelor and shareholders of ArcelorMittal will become shareholders of Arcelor, which will subsequently be renamed “ArcelorMittal”. The second-step merger is intended to further rationalize the corporate structure of the combined company initiated by the first-step merger of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal. It is intended to complete the second-step merger as soon as practicable after the completion of the first-step merger.
The Boards of Directors of Mittal Steel, ArcelorMittal and Arcelor have unanimously decided that the second-step merger of ArcelorMittal into Arcelor will be effected on the basis of an exchange ratio of 7 Arcelor shares for every 8 ArcelorMittal shares.
The acquisition of the minority interest in connection with the merger of ArcelorMittal (the surviving entity in the Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal merger) into Arcelor will be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The excess of the purchase price over the historical book value of the minority interest will be recorded as goodwill.
19
Table of Contents
Other referenced acquisitions and divestitures as disclosed on pages 13 through 15 in “Presentation of Certain Financial and Other Information—Recent Developments”, have not been reflected in the pro forma adjustments. The other referenced acquisitions and divestitures were not individually or in the aggregate significant to Mittal Steel as defined in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information has been prepared for illustrative purposes only. Because of its nature, it addresses a hypothetical situation and, therefore, does not represent ArcelorMittal’s actual financial position or results. It does not purport to indicate the results of operations or the combined financial position that would have resulted had the transactions been completed at the beginning of the period presented, nor is it intended to be indicative of expected results of operations in future periods or the future financial position of ArcelorMittal. The pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and certain assumptions that ArcelorMittal believes to be reasonable. These adjustments could materially change as the allocation of the purchase price for Arcelor has not been finalized. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the final allocation of purchase price will not differ materially from the preliminary allocation reflected in the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information should be read in conjunction with the notes thereto as well as the historical consolidated financial statements of Mittal Steel and Arcelor, each incorporated by reference into this Registration Statement on Form F-4.
The audited consolidated financial statements of Mittal Steel as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, included in Mittal Steel’s Annual Report on Form 20-F (dated April 17, 2007, as amended June 29, 2007), were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (“IFRS”). The audited consolidated financial statements of Arcelor were prepared in accordance with IFRS. To assist in understanding the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information, a quantitative and qualitative reconciliation from IFRS to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for the pro forma combined shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2006 and the pro forma combined net income for the year ended December 31, 2006 is included in Note 12 herein.
20
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2006
| (in millions of U.S. Dollars) | Pro Forma Adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mittal Steel Historical |
Acquisition of Minority Interest of Arcelor Brasil |
Share Buy-Back Program |
Pro Forma Combined Mittal Steel |
Merger of Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal |
Pro Forma Combined ArcelorMittal |
Merger of ArcelorMittal into Arcelor |
Pro Forma Combined ArcelorMittal | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Note 2a | ) | (Note 3 | ) | (Note 4 | ) | (Note 5 | ) | (Note 6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Current assets |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and short-term investments |
$ | 6,146 | $ | (4,319 | ) a | $ | (590 | ) | $ | 1,237 | $ | — | $ | 1,237 | $ | — | $ | 1,237 | |||||||||||
| Trade accounts receivable |
8,769 | — | — | 8,769 | — | 8,769 | — | 8,769 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventories |
19,238 | — | — | 19,238 | — | 19,238 | — | 19,238 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
5,209 | — | — | 5,209 | — | 5,209 | — | 5,209 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total current assets |
39,362 | (4,319 | ) | (590 | ) | 34,453 | — | 34,453 | — | 34,453 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Goodwill and intangible assets |
10,782 | 3,755 | — | 14,537 | — | 14,537 | 1,120 | 15,657 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment |
54,696 | — | — | 54,696 | — | 54,696 | — | 54,696 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Investments accounted for using the equity method |
3,492 | — | — | 3,492 | — | a,b | 3,492 | — | 3,492 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other assets |
2,164 | — | — | 2,164 | — | 2,164 | — | 2,164 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Deferred tax assets |
1,670 | — | — | 1,670 | — | 1,670 | — | 1,670 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets |
$ | 112,166 | $ | (564 | ) | $ | (590 | ) | $ | 111,012 | $ | — | $ | 111,012 | $ | 1,120 | $ | 112,132 | |||||||||||
| Current liabilities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Payable to banks and current portion of long-term debt |
$ | 4,922 | $ | — | $ | 1,790 | $ | 6,712 | $ | — | $ | 6,712 | $ | — | $ | 6,712 | |||||||||||||
| Trade accounts payable |
10,717 | — | — | 10,717 | — | 10,717 | — | 10,717 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
8,921 | — | — | 8,921 | — | 8,921 | — | 8,921 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total current liabilities |
24,560 | — | 1,790 | 26,350 | — | 26,350 | — | 26,350 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt, net of current portion |
21,645 | — | — | 21,645 | — | 21,645 | — | 21,645 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Deferred employee benefits |
5,285 | — | — | 5,285 | — | 5,285 | — | 5,285 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities |
7,274 | — | — | 7,274 | — | 7,274 | — | 7,274 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Other long-term obligations |
3,211 | — | — | 3,211 | — | 3,211 | — | 3,211 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities |
61,975 | — | 1,790 | 63,765 | — | 63,765 | — | 63,765 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity attributable to the equity holders of the parent |
42,127 | 1,793 | a,b | (2,380 | ) | 41,540 | — | a,b | 41,540 | 2,924 | a,b | 44,464 | |||||||||||||||||
| Minority interest |
8,064 | (2,357 | ) b | — | 5,707 | — | 5,707 | (1,804 | ) b | 3,903 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total equity |
50,191 | (564 | ) | (2,380 | ) | 47,247 | — | 47,247 | 1,120 | 48,367 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 112,166 | $ | (564 | ) | $ | (590 | ) | $ | 111,012 | $ | — | $ | 111,012 | $ | 1,120 | $ | 112,132 | |||||||||||
See accompanying notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information
21
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2006
| (in millions of U.S. Dollars, except per share data) |
Pro forma adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mittal Steel Historical |
Arcelor Historical (January 1 to July 31, 2006) |
Acquisition of Arcelor |
Acquisition of Minority Interest of Arcelor Brasil |
Share Buy- Back Program |
Pro Forma Combined Mittal Steel |
Merger of into ArcelorMittal |
Pro Forma Combined ArcelorMittal |
Merger of into Arcelor |
Pro Forma Combined ArcelorMittal |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Note 2b) | (Note 2c) | (Note 7) | (Note 8) | (Note 9) | (Note 5) | (Note 10) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sales |
$ | 58,870 | $ | 28,659 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 87,529 | $ | — | $ | 87,529 | $ | — | $ | 87,529 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Cost of sales |
48,411 | 23,381 | 35 | a | — | — | 71,827 | — | 71,827 | — | 71,827 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selling, general, and administrative |
2,960 | 2,260 | — | — | — | 5,220 | — | 5,220 | — | 5,220 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating income |
7,499 | 3,018 | (35 | ) | — | — | 10,482 | — | 10,482 | — | 10,482 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other income – net |
49 | (341 | ) | 341 | b | — | — | 49 | — | 49 | — | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income from equity method investments |
301 | 269 | — | — | — | 570 | — | 570 | — | 570 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Finance costs – net |
(654 | ) | (451 | ) | (222 | ) c | — | (75 | ) a | (1,402 | ) | — | (1,402 | ) | — | (1,402 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes |
7,195 | 2,495 | 84 | — | (75 | ) | 9,699 | — | 9,699 | — | 9,699 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense |
(1,109 | ) | 34 | (21 | ) d | — | 19 | (1,077 | ) | — | (1,077 | ) | — | (1,077 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income (including minority interest) |
$ | 6,086 | $ | 2,529 | $ | 63 | $ | — | $ | (56 | ) | $ | 8,622 | $ | — | $ | 8,622 | $ | — | $ | 8,622 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Attributable to: |
$ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity holders of parent |
$ | 5,226 | $ | 2,103 | $ | (74 | ) e | $ | 476 | a | $ | (56 | ) | $ | 7,675 | $ | — | $ | 7,675 | $ | 217 | a | 7,892 | ||||||||||||||||
| Minority interest |
860 | 426 | 137 | e | (476 | ) a | — | 947 | $ | — | 947 | (217 | ) a | 730 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings-per-share: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic |
$ | 5.29 | $ | 5.58 | $ | 5.58 | $ | $ | 5.56 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted |
5.28 | 5.58 | 5.58 | 5.56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic |
988 | 396 f | 27 | b | (37 | ) c | 1,375 | 1,375 | 44 | b | 1,419 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted |
989 | 396 f | 27 | b | (37 | ) c | 1,376 | 1,376 | 44 | b | 1,420 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Note 1 – Basis of Pro Forma Presentation
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Income Statement for the year ended December 31, 2006 reflects adjustments as if each of the acquisition of Arcelor, accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, the pending acquisition of the outstanding minority interest in Arcelor Brasil, the merger of Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal, and the proposed merger of ArcelorMittal into Arcelor had occurred on January 1, 2006. The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet reflects adjustments as if the pending acquisition of the outstanding minority interest in Arcelor Brasil, the merger of Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal, and the proposed merger of ArcelorMittal into Arcelor had occurred as of December 31, 2006.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not purport to indicate the results of operations or the combined financial position that would have resulted had the transactions been completed as of the dates indicated, nor is it intended to be indicative of expected results of operations in future periods or the future financial position of ArcelorMittal. Likewise, the pro forma combined provision for income taxes and the pro forma combined balances of deferred taxes may not represent the amounts that would have resulted had the entities filed consolidated income tax returns during the periods presented. In addition, they do not reflect cost savings or other synergies resulting from the acquisitions that may be realized in future periods.
Intercompany sales between the entities included in the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information have not been excluded or eliminated from the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Information as the amounts are not material.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information has been prepared on the basis of assumptions described in these notes. Mittal Steel has not completed its purchase price allocation for its acquisition of Arcelor, and the actual allocation may materially differ from the preliminary allocation. For the purposes of the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information, the excess of purchase price over the preliminary fair value of the net assets acquired has been allocated to goodwill. As Mittal Steel completes the purchase price allocation for Arcelor, the excess may be allocated to other identified intangible assets including patents, customer related intangibles, and favorable and unfavorable contracts and to contingent liabilities including environmental obligations and litigation claims. The receipt of the final valuation and the impact of ongoing integration activities could cause material differences between actual and pro forma results in the information presented.
Note 2 – Historical Financial Statements
Represents the historical financial statements of Mittal Steel and Arcelor in accordance with IFRS.
a) Represents the historical condensed consolidated balance sheet of Mittal Steel as of December 31, 2006.
b) Represents the historical condensed consolidated statement of income of Mittal Steel for the year ended December 31, 2006.
c) Represents the historical condensed consolidated statement of income of Arcelor for the period from January 1, 2006 through July 31, 2006 translated from euros into U.S. dollars using an average exchange rate of €1 to $1.2343.
Note 3 – Acquisition of the Minority Interest in Arcelor Brasil (Balance Sheet)
On September 25, 2006, the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (the “CVM”), the Brazilian securities regulator, ruled that, as a result of Mittal Steel’s acquisition of Arcelor, Mittal Steel was required to carry out a public offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares in Arcelor Brasil not owned by Arcelor or any other affiliate of Mittal Steel. Pursuant to the ruling, the value to be offered to Arcelor Brasil’s shareholders is to be determined on the basis of the value of the part of the overall consideration paid for Arcelor by Mittal Steel that was attributable to Arcelor Brasil. On April 17, 2007, the CVM granted registration of the offer, which opened on April 27, 2007 and closed on June 4, 2007. The consideration offered per Arcelor Brasil share was R$11.70 in cash and 0.3568 Mittal Steel class A common shares, subject to certain adjustments. Tendering Arcelor Brasil shareholders could also accept an all-cash option, pursuant to which they would receive cash in an amount equal to the value of the cash and share consideration described above, calculated in the manner set forth in the offering documents.
23
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
As of June 4, 2007, 191.3 million Arcelor Brasil shares were tendered, representing 29.5% of the total Arcelor Brasil share capital and 89.7% of the free float of Arcelor Brasil. Of the total number of shares tendered 39.6% were tendered pursuant to the Mixed Offer and 60.4% pursuant to the Cash Offer. The total value offered per Arcelor Brasil share is €21.05 ($28.31). The amount of cash to be paid by Mittal Steel will be approximately €3.2 billion ($4.3 billion). The number of Mittal Steel class A common shares issued was approximately 27 million shares, representing 2% of the share capital of Mittal Steel on a diluted basis. The sell-out right for shareholders who decided not to tender commenced on June 5, 2007 and will end no later than on September 4, 2007 (inclusive), as required by regulations of the CVM. ArcelorMittal intends to redeem all of the remaining shares through a tender squeeze-out process as permitted by Brazilian regulations, given that the free float following the Offer will represent less than 5% of the total share capital of Arcelor Brasil. The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information assumes that the value offered per Arcelor Brasil share is as described above and that the reference price of class A common shares of Mittal Steel to be used for determining the number of shares to be delivered pursuant to the offering documents is assumed to be $66.31, the closing share price on the New York Stock Exchange on June 21, 2007.
In addition, the impact of ongoing integration activities, the timing of completion of the acquisition, transaction costs to be allocated or incurred, and other changes, which occur prior to completion of the acquisition, could cause material differences between actual and pro forma results in the information presented.
| a) | The estimated total purchase price for the acquisition is as follows: |
| Amount (in millions) | |||
| Estimated value of Mittal Steel shares issued (approximately 27 million shares x $66.31) |
$ | 1,793 | |
| Estimated total cash paid to security holders |
4,319 | ||
| Total purchase price |
$ | 6,112 | |
| b) | Represents the elimination of the historical book value of minority interest acquired of $2,357 and the estimated excess of the proposed purchase price over the book value of the Arcelor Brasil minority interest. The excess of $3,755 is recorded as an increase in goodwill. |
| Amount (in millions) | |||
| Total purchase price |
$ | 6,112 | |
| Less: historical book value of minority interest acquired |
2,357 | ||
| Adjustment to goodwill resulting from the excess of purchase price over book value |
$ | 3,755 | |
Although during 2006 there were no acquisitions of minority interest, in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements Mittal Steel determined the policy to be applied for future acquisition of minority interest to be that which is disclosed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. Subsequent to the issuance of Mittal Steel’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006, and in connection with its considerations related to the accounting for acquisition of the minority interest in Arcelor Brasil, Mittal Steel determined to voluntarily change its accounting policy to account for the excess of purchase price and the historical book value as goodwill. Mittal Steel believes that accounting for such excess as goodwill provides more relevant information consistent with the economics of the transaction. As no transactions were accounted for applying the policy disclosed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, retrospective application of this change has no effect on prior periods. The pro forma adjustments above reflect the acquisition of Arcelor Brasil in accordance with the revised policy.
Note 4 – Share-buy Back Programs (Balance Sheet)
On April 2, 2007, Mittal Steel announced the commencement of a share buy-back program to repurchase up to a maximum aggregate amount of $590 million of its class A common shares. The share buy-back program will
24
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
end at the earliest of (i) December 31, 2007, (ii) the moment on which the aggregate value of class A common shares repurchased by Mittal Steel since the start of this share buy-back program reaches $590 million, or (iii) the moment on which Mittal Steel and its subsidiaries hold 10% of the total number of the then-issued class A and class B common shares. As of June 15, 2007, 9.3 million shares have been repurchased under this program for consideration of approximately €431 million ($579 million). The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information assumes that 0.2 million additional shares will be repurchased for consideration of €8 million ($11 million) for a total of 9.5 million shares repurchased.
On June 12, 2007, Mittal Steel announced its intention to start a share buy-back program for up to a maximum of 27 million class A common shares, immediately following the completion of its current $590 million share buy-back program. This new share buy-back program is aimed at offsetting the issuance of shares in the tender offer by Mittal Steel for the acquisition of all outstanding minority interests in Arcelor Brasil. The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information includes estimated consideration paid for this new share buy-back program to be approximately $1,790 million assuming the maximum number of shares repurchased of 27 million and a price per share of $66.31, the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on June 21, 2007. This share buy-back program is assumed to be financed through new credit facilities. All necessary corporate actions will be taken at the level of ArcelorMittal in order to allow the continuation by ArcelorMittal of the Mittal Steel share buy-back programs (the ongoing $590 million program and the announced subsequent 27 million share program) following effectiveness of the merger.
Note 5 – Merger of Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal
ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel have agreed in a merger agreement dated May 2, 2007 to merge as contemplated by the merger proposal, as described in this proxy statement/prospectus. Under the terms of the merger proposal, Mittal Steel will merge into ArcelorMittal, by way of absorption by ArcelorMittal of Mittal Steel and without liquidation of Mittal Steel.
ArcelorMittal was incorporated on August 13, 2004 under the name Verger Investments S.A. It has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mittal Steel since April 24, 2007 and was renamed “ArcelorMittal” on April 26, 2007. ArcelorMittal has not conducted operations to date and will not have conducted any operations prior to the merger. Prior to the merger, ArcelorMittal did not have any assets, liabilities (contingent or otherwise) or commitments, other than assets consisting of an immaterial amount of cash. It is being used to facilitate the two-step merger process described above.
In the merger, a holder of Mittal Steel class A common shares will receive one newly issued ArcelorMittal share for every Mittal Steel Class A common share, which is referred to as the Class A Exchange Ratio. A holder of Mittal Steel class B common shares will receive one newly issued ArcelorMittal share for every one Mittal Steel class B common share, which is referred to as the Class B Exchange Ratio.
Mittal Steel class A common shares and Mittal Steel class B common shares held in treasury by Mittal Steel will cease to exist as a result of the merger and pursuant to Dutch law. ArcelorMittal will not issue any shares in consideration of such Mittal Steel class A common shares and Mittal Steel class B common shares held in treasury by Mittal Steel.
The ArcelorMittal shares to be issued in the merger will be created under Luxembourg law and will have the rights as set forth in ArcelorMittal’s articles of association and Luxembourg law. No additional consideration in cash or in kind will be paid by ArcelorMittal to the shareholders of Mittal Steel in connection with the merger.
Former Mittal Steel shareholders will hold 100% of the outstanding shares of ArcelorMittal after the merger.
a) Reflects the issuance of ArcelorMittal shares in exchange for the net assets of Mittal Steel as of December 31, 2006.
b) Reflects the elimination of ArcelorMittal’s investment in Mittal Steel against the combined equity of Mittal Steel.
25
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| Amount (in millions) |
||||
| a) Issuance of ArcelorMittal shares |
$ | 42,127 | ||
| b) Elimination of ArcelorMittal’s investment |
(42,127 | ) | ||
| Total pro forma adjustment |
$ | — | ||
Note 6 – Merger of ArcelorMittal into Arcelor (Balance Sheet)
In the second-step merger, ArcelorMittal (the surviving entity in the Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal merger) will merge into Arcelor and shareholders of ArcelorMittal will become shareholders of Arcelor, which will subsequently be renamed “ArcelorMittal”. The second-step merger is intended to further rationalize the corporate structure of the combined company initiated by the first-step merger of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal. It is intended to complete the second-step merger as soon as practicable after the completion of the first-step merger.
The Boards of Directors of Mittal Steel, ArcelorMittal and Arcelor have unanimously decided that the second-step merger of ArcelorMittal into Arcelor will be effected on the basis of an exchange ratio of 7 Arcelor shares for every 8 ArcelorMittal shares. The acquisition of the minority interest in connection with the merger of ArcelorMittal (the surviving entity in the Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal merger) into Arcelor will be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The excess of the purchase price over the historical book value of the minority interest will be recorded as goodwill.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information assumes the per share price of ArcelorMittal shares to be $66.31, the closing share price on the New York Stock Exchange on June 21, 2007.
| a) | The estimated total purchase price for the acquisition of the minority interest in Arcelor is as follows: |
| Amount (in millions) | |||
| Estimated value of ArcelorMittal shares issued (approximately 44 million shares x $66.31) |
$ | 2,924 | |
| Estimated cash paid to security holders |
— | ||
| Total purchase price |
$ | 2,924 | |
| b) | Represents the elimination of the historical book value of minority interest acquired of $1,804 and the estimated excess of the proposed purchase price over the book value of the Arcelor minority interest. The excess of $1,120 is recorded as an increase in goodwill. |
| Amount (in millions) | |||
| Total purchase price |
$ | 2,924 | |
| Less: historical book value of minority interest acquired |
1,804 | ||
| Adjustment to goodwill resulting from the excess of purchase price over book value |
$ | 1,120 | |
Note 7 – Acquisition of Arcelor (Statement of Income)
Mittal Steel, through a series of transactions, acquired 94.2% of the issued and outstanding shares of Arcelor and all of Arcelor’s Convertible bonds. Aggregate consideration consisted of cash paid by Mittal Steel of approximately €8.0 billion (approximately $10.2 billion) and approximately 680 million Mittal Steel class A shares, valued at $34.20 per share for IFRS accounting purposes, the weighted average closing price on August 1, 2006 and September 4, 2006 (the dates of the issuance of Mittal Steel shares as consideration).
26
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The purchase price for the Arcelor acquisition was determined as follows:
| Amount (in millions) | |||
| Value of Mittal Steel shares issued |
$ | 23,240 | |
| Cash paid to security holders |
10,247 | ||
| Bankers’ fees and other transaction costs |
188 | ||
| Total purchase price |
$ | 33,675 | |
| Less: Cash acquired |
4,594 | ||
| Total purchase price, net |
$ | 29,081 | |
The following table presents the preliminary amounts assigned to the net assets acquired based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition:
| (in millions) | Arcelor Historical |
Purchase Accounting Adjustments |
Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation |
|||||||||
| Assets: |
||||||||||||
| Current assets |
$ | 21,292 | $ | 1,060 | $ | 22,352 | ||||||
| Property, plant and equipment |
22,480 | 11,770 | 34,250 | |||||||||
| Other non-current assets |
6,356 | 1,607 | 7,963 | |||||||||
| Liabilities: |
||||||||||||
| Current liabilities |
(16,178 | ) | — | (16,178 | ) | |||||||
| Long-term loan |
(8,830 | ) | (80 | ) | (8,910 | ) | ||||||
| Other long-term liabilities |
(5,532 | ) | (699 | ) | (6,231 | ) | ||||||
| Deferred income taxes |
(1,276 | ) | (4,029 | ) | (5,305 | ) | ||||||
| Minority interest |
(3,303 | ) | (144 | ) | (3,447 | ) | ||||||
| Net assets |
$ | 15,009 | $ | 9,485 | $ | 24,494 | ||||||
| Minority interest |
(1,147 | ) | (614 | ) | (1,761 | ) | ||||||
| Net assets acquired |
$ | 13,862 | $ | 8,871 | $ | 22,733 | ||||||
| Fair value of shares issued |
23,240 | |||||||||||
| Cash paid, net of $4,594 cash acquired |
5,841 | |||||||||||
| Purchase price, net |
$ | 29,081 | ||||||||||
| Goodwill |
$ | 6,348 | ||||||||||
The Arcelor acquisition was financed with credit extended by financial institutions under agreements entered into on January 30, 2006 (as subsequently amended) and May 23, 2006 totaling €7.8 billion (approximately $10.0 billion). Further, on September 7, 2006 and September 11, 2006, Mittal Steel signed a revolving credit facility of €1.0 billion (approximately $1.3 billion) to finance the further acquisition of shares. $9,067 million was utilized towards the cash settlement of the purchase consideration of the Arcelor acquisition. The cash acquired from the Arcelor acquisition has been reduced for transaction costs of $165 million and a $176 million fee paid by Arcelor to Severstal upon the termination of the agreement relating to a proposed transaction between Arcelor and Severstal. The financing of the cash paid is summarized below:
| Amount (in millions) | |||
| Short-term debt incurred |
$ | 2,750 | |
| Long-term debt incurred |
6,317 | ||
| Cash from balance sheet paid |
1,709 | ||
| Total financing |
$ | 10,776 | |
| a) | Reflects the incremental amortization of unfavorable and favorable contracts recognized in connection with the acquisition of Arcelor, for the period from January 1, 2006 through July 31, 2006. Annual |
27
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| expected amortization is $60 million per annum, based on preliminary estimates. Therefore the $35 million adjustment reflects the incremental amortization for the seven months ended July 31, 2006. |
| Approximately $6.3 billion has been allocated to goodwill. As Mittal Steel completes the purchase price allocation, this excess may be allocated to other identified tangible or intangible assets, including patents, customer related intangibles, and favorable and unfavorable contracts, which could be depreciable or amortizable. If this amount were allocated to assets with estimated useful lives of 10-25 years, amortization expense would increase by approximately $630 million to $254 million per annum, before income taxes. |
| Based on preliminary estimates, Mittal Steel has allocated $11.8 billion to property, plant and equipment. Historically, the useful lives of property, plant and equipment applied by Arcelor ranged from 5 to 25 years. In connection with Mittal Steel’s acquisition of Arcelor and its fair valuation of the acquired assets and liabilities, Mittal Steel assessed the remaining useful lives of property, plant and equipment based on its current state and Mittal Steel’s experience in operating such assets. This assessment resulted in the assignment of remaining useful lives ranging from 5 to 38 years. |
| As a result of these two offsetting effects, Mittal Steel does not expect the acquisition to have a significant impact on depreciation expense. |
| b) | Represents the elimination of $341 million of costs directly incurred by Arcelor related to the acquisition that were expensed during the seven months ended July 31, 2006. The costs are primarily composed of financial advisory, legal and other non-recurring professional fees. Assuming the acquisition took place on January 1, 2006, these costs would not have been expensed during the period presented. |
| c) | Represents the incremental interest expense related to the borrowings noted above, for the period from January 1, 2006 through July 31, 2006. Interest is calculated based on EURIBOR plus a margin. The interest rate has been estimated at 4.2% or approximately $381 million per annum. Therefore the $222 million adjustment represents the incremental interest expense for the seven months ended July 31, 2006. A 0.5% or 50 basis point change in the interest rate would increase or decrease net income by approximately $45 million per annum, before income taxes. |
| d) | Represents the tax impact of the above adjustments assuming a 25% blended statutory rate. |
| e) | The following represents the reallocation of the net income attributable to minority interests to net income attributable to equity holders of the parent resulting from the adjustments as if the acquisition of Arcelor had occurred on January 1, 2006. |
| Amount (in millions) |
||||
| Attributable to: |
||||
| Equity holders of the parent |
||||
| Net income (including minority interest) |
$ | 63 | ||
| Allocation of 5.8% minority interest share of Arcelor historical net income attributable to equity holders of the parent (2,103 x 5.8%) |
(122 | ) | ||
| Allocation of 5.8% minority interest share of 6b) net of income taxes of $85 million |
(15 | ) | ||
| Total |
$ | (74 | ) | |
| Minority interest |
||||
| Allocation of 5.8% minority interest share of Arcelor historical net income attributable to equity holders of the parent (2,103 x 5.8%) |
$ | 122 | ||
| Allocation of 5.8% minority interest share of 6b) net of income taxes of $85 million |
15 | |||
| Total |
$ | 137 | ||
| f) | Represents the incremental weighted average of the 680 million Mittal Steel class A common shares issued for the acquisition of Arcelor for seven months. |
28
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Note 8 – Acquisition of the Minority Interest of Arcelor Brasil (Statement of Income)
Mittal Steel has proposed to acquire the outstanding minority interest of Arcelor Brasil. See Note 3 for a description of the proposed transaction.
| a) | Represents the reallocation of the net income attributable to minority interests to net income attributable to equity holders of the parent, as a result of the acquisition of the minority interest. |
| b) | Represents the number of Mittal Steel class A common shares issued for the proposed acquisition of Arcelor Brasil. |
Note 9 – Share-buy Back Programs (Balance Sheet)
Mittal Steel has proposed share-buy back programs as described in Note 4.
| a) | Represents the incremental interest expense related to the borrowings to fund the 27 million share buy back program for the period from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006. Interest is calculated based on EURIBOR plus a margin. The interest rate has been estimated at 4.2% or approximately $75 million per annum. A 0.5% or 50 basis point change in the interest rate would increase or decrease net income by approximately $9 million per annum, before income taxes. |
| b) | Represents the tax impact of the above adjustments assuming a 25% blended statutory rate. |
| c) | Represents the number of Mittal Steel class A common shares repurchased for the $590 million share buy-back program (9.5 million shares) and the 27 million share buy-back program. |
Note 10 – Merger of ArcelorMittal into Arcelor (Statement of Income)
ArcelorMittal (the surviving entity in the Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal merger) will merge into Arcelor. See Note 6 for a description of the proposed transaction.
| a) | Represents the reallocation of the net income attributable to minority interests to net income attributable to equity holders of the parent, as a result of the acquisition of the minority interest of $80 million recorded for the five-month period ended December 31, 2006 and $137 million recorded for the pro forma adjustment as described in Note 7e). |
| b) | Represents the number of additional ArcelorMittal shares to be issued in connection with the proposed merger of ArcelorMittal into Arcelor. |
Note 11 – Other Information
Described below are various events which occurred subsequent to the acquisition and which have not been reflected in the pro forma adjustments described above:
| a) | Following the Arcelor acquisition, Mittal Steel adopted a dividend policy to distribute 25% of its annual net income. Had this policy been in effect as of January 1, 2006, the pro forma dividend per share of Mittal Steel and Arcelor combined would have been $1.49 for the year ended December 31, 2006, on a basic and diluted basis. |
| b) | On February 20, 2007 the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) informed Mittal Steel that it had selected the Sparrows Point plant for divesture under the consent decree filed by the DOJ in August 2006. See “Recent Developments – Dofasco” for a discussion of the consent decree and the context in which it was entered. The Company is currently in the process of divesting the Sparrows Point plant. Given that this divestiture is not material, it has not been included in the pro forma adjustments. |
| c) | Other referenced acquisitions and divestitures as disclosed on pages 13 through 15 in “Presentation of Certain Financial and Other Information—Recent Developments”, have not been reflected in the pro forma adjustments. The other referenced acquisitions and divestitures were not individually or in the aggregate significant to Mittal Steel as defined in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X. |
29
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Note 12 - Significant Differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP
The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information was prepared in accordance with IFRS, which, as applied by ArcelorMittal, differs in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. Under ArcelorMittal’s accounting policies, there are no differences between IFRS and International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. The effects of the application of U.S. GAAP to pro forma consolidated net income for the year ended December 31, 2006, respectively, as reported under IFRS, are set out in the table below:
| (in millions) | For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
|||
| Pro forma combined net income (including minority interest) as reported under IFRS |
$ | 8,622 | ||
| Less: pro forma combined minority interest share of net income |
730 | |||
| Pro forma net income attributable to equity holders of parent, as reported under IFRS |
7,892 | |||
| U.S. GAAP adjustments: |
||||
| (a) Employee benefits |
54 | |||
| (b) Business combination – related adjustments |
||||
| (1) Negative goodwill |
280 | |||
| (2) Measurement date |
— | |||
| (3) Revaluation of minority interests |
379 | |||
| (4) Restructuring provisions |
80 | |||
| (5) Finalization of purchase price allocation |
— | |||
| (c) Other |
(153 | ) | ||
| (d) Deferred income tax effect on adjustments |
(279 | ) | ||
| (e) Effect of minority interests on adjustments |
(175 | ) | ||
| Total U.S. GAAP adjustments |
186 | |||
| Pro forma net income, as determined under U.S. GAAP |
$ | 8,078 | ||
The effects of the application of U.S. GAAP to pro forma consolidated shareholders' equity as of December 31, 2006, as reported under IFRS, is set out in the table below:
| (in millions) | December 31, 2006 | |||
| Pro forma combined shareholders’ equity, as reported under IFRS |
$ | 48,367 | ||
| Less: pro forma combined minority interest, as reported under IFRS |
(3,903 | ) | ||
| Pro forma combined shareholders’ equity excluding minority |
44,464 | |||
| U.S. GAAP adjustments: |
||||
| (a) Employee benefits |
(1,225 | ) | ||
| (b) Business combination – related adjustments |
||||
| (1) Negative goodwill |
(3,240 | ) | ||
| (2) Measurement date |
(2,133 | ) | ||
| (3) Transactions with minority interests |
(1,632 | ) | ||
| (4) Restructuring provisions |
80 | |||
| (5) Finalization of purchase price allocation |
121 | |||
| (c) Other |
(161 | ) | ||
| (d) Deferred income tax effect on adjustments |
1,125 | |||
| (e) Effect of minority interests on adjustments |
1,817 | |||
| Total U.S. GAAP adjustments |
(5,248 | ) | ||
| Pro forma combined shareholders’ equity under U.S. GAAP |
$ | 39,216 | ||
30
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(a) Employee benefits
The aggregate adjustments included in the table above as of December 31, 2006 for the balance sheet and for the year then ended for the statement of income consist of the following:
| As of December 31, 2006 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 | ||||||
| Recognition of funded status (SFAS 158) |
$ | (1,012 | ) | $ | 12 | ||
| Prior service costs |
(213 | ) | 42 | ||||
| Total U.S. GAAP adjustments (before income |
$ | (1,225 | ) | $ | 54 | ||
Recognition of funded status (SFAS 158)
Under U.S. GAAP, the Company accounts for its pensions and post-retirement benefit plans in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions” and SFAS 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Post-retirement Benefits” and, from December 31, 2006, SFAS 158, “Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R).” Effective December 31, 2006, SFAS No. 158 requires the Company to recognize the funded status of employee benefit plans on the balance sheet. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 158, the Company recognized an additional minimum pension liability as described below. Due to the adoption of SFAS 158, actuarial gains and losses and past service costs, (which remain unrecognized amounts under IFRS) are recognized as of December 31, 2006 directly in equity, net of deferred income taxes.
Prior service costs
Under IFRS, in accordance with IAS 19, “Employee Benefits”, where pension benefits have already vested, past service costs are recognized immediately. Under U.S. GAAP, in accordance with FAS 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions”, prior service costs are amortized over the remaining working lives for both vested and unvested rights.
(b) Business combinations
| (1) | Negative goodwill |
Under IFRS 3, “Business Combinations,” any excess of the fair value of acquired net assets over the acquisition cost (negative goodwill) is recognized immediately as income. Under U.S. GAAP, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) 141, “Business Combinations,” any excess of the fair value of acquired net assets over the acquisition cost (negative goodwill) is allocated on a pro rata basis to reduce the amount allocated to non-current, non-monetary assets until such assets are reduced to zero. Any remaining excess is recognized immediately as an extraordinary gain.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, U.S. GAAP depreciation and amortization expense was reduced by $280 million and U.S. GAAP equity was decreased by $3,240 million as a result of the above difference.
| (2) | Measurement date |
Under IFRS, the guidance of IFRS 3 requires that securities issued as consideration in a business combination be recorded at their fair value as of the date of exchange – the date on which an entity obtains control over the acquiree’s net assets and operations. Under U.S. GAAP, in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 99-12: “Determination of the Measurement Date for the Market Price of Acquirer Securities Issued in a Purchase Business Combination,” the measurement date used to determine the fair value of securities issued as consideration in a business combination is date when the terms of transaction are agreed to and announced.
| (3) | Revaluation of minority interest |
Under IFRS, when Mittal Steel acquires less than 100% of a subsidiary, the minority interest is stated on Mittal Steel’s balance sheet at the minority’s proportion of the net fair value of acquired assets, liabilities and
31
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
contingent liabilities assumed. Under U.S. GAAP, the minority interest is valued at its historical book value. Fair values are only assigned to Mittal Steel’s share of the net assets acquired. This decreased U.S. GAAP equity by approximately $1,632 million, before income tax, as of December 31, 2006 and increased U.S. GAAP net income by approximately $379 million, before income tax, for the year ended December 31, 2006, respectively.
| (4) | Restructuring provisions |
Under IFRS, the Company may recognize restructuring provisions as part of the acquired liabilities only if the Company has an existing liability at the acquisition date for a restructuring plan recognized in accordance with International Accounting Standards (“IAS”) 37, “Provisions, contingent liabilities, and contingent assets”.
Under U.S. GAAP, EITF 95-3, “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Business Combination,” requires the Company to recognize a restructuring liability at the acquisition date if specific criteria are met. Mittal Steel must have a plan to exit an activity as of the acquisition date, and communication of such a plan should have occurred.
Acquisition of ISG
In conjunction with the acquisition of ISG, a restructuring provision was recognized under U.S. GAAP, which could not be recognized for IFRS purposes. Therefore, under IFRS, the net assets acquired were higher than those recognized under U.S. GAAP in the opening balance sheet, resulting in a corresponding adjustment to the amount of negative goodwill recognized immediately in the P&L under IFRS, which is not recognized for U.S. GAAP purposes. The difference has no impact on consolidated shareholders’ equity in total between IFRS and U.S. GAAP, however, in reconciling from IFRS to U.S. GAAP, a reclassification adjustment is necessary within equity (from retained earnings under IFRS to additional paid in capital under U.S. GAAP) for the above difference.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, ISG recorded a restructuring provision of $80 million under IFRS, which was recognized under U.S. GAAP through the purchase accounting during the year ended December 31, 2005. Accordingly, the provision recorded under IFRS has been reversed during the year ended December 31, 2006 under U.S. GAAP.
(5) Finalization of purchase price allocation (“PPA”)
The aggregate adjustments included in the tables above as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 consist of the following:
| As of December 31, 2006 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 | ||||||
| U.S. GAAP adjustments: |
|||||||
| Finalization of ISG PPA |
$ | 130 | $ | — | |||
| Finalization of Kryviy Rih PPA |
(9 | ) | — | ||||
| Total U.S. GAAP adjustments (before income taxes and minority interest) |
121 | — | |||||
| Effect of income taxes on adjustments |
— | — | |||||
| Effect of minority interests on adjustments |
10 | — | |||||
| Total U.S. GAAP adjustments (after income taxes and minority interest) |
$ | 131 | $ | — | |||
Under IFRS and U.S. GAAP, the period that is allowed for finalizing the identification and measurement of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination ends when the acquiring entity is no longer waiting for information that it has arranged to obtain and that is known to be available or obtainable. That allocation period should usually not exceed one year from the consummation of a business combination. Accordingly, the measurement and recognition of certain items that were recorded on a preliminary basis as of December 31, 2005, have been subsequently adjusted to take into account the new information obtained in 2006 regarding the facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date and that, if known, would have affected the measurement or recognition of the amounts as of that date.
32
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Under IFRS, the prior period financial statements were modified to reflect these adjustments from the date of acquisition. Under U.S. GAAP, the prior period financial statements were not modified to reflect these adjustments. Accordingly, the negative goodwill adjustment along with the impact of other changes applied retrospectively under IFRS, were reversed as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 under U.S. GAAP. The final U.S. GAAP purchase price adjustments were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2006, with no impact on the consolidated statement of income.
(c) Other
The aggregate other adjustment included as of December 31, 2006 and for the year then ended consists of the following:
| As of December 31, 2006 |
For the year ended 2006 |
|||||||
| Inventory valuation |
$ | (154 | ) | $ | (144 | ) | ||
| Change in discount rates for asset retirement obligations |
15 | 10 | ||||||
| Embedded leases |
9 | (1 | ) | |||||
| Other |
(31 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||
| Total U.S. GAAP adjustments (before income taxes and minority interest) |
$ | (161 | ) | $ | (153 | ) | ||
Inventory valuation
Under IFRS, inventory is measured on the basis of first in – first out (FIFO). Under U.S. GAAP, the Company measures certain inventory on the basis of last in – first out (LIFO).
Change in discount rates for asset retirement obligations
Under IFRS, the discount rate applied is adjusted at each reporting period, with a corresponding adjustment to the cost of the property, plant and equipment asset and to the liability. Under U.S. GAAP, the original discount rate is not adjusted.
Embedded leases
Under IFRS, from January 1, 2004, the Group applied the accounting requirements of IFRIC 4, “Determining Whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease”. In accordance with the transition provisions of IFRIC 4, the Group was required to analyze all existing arrangements and to account for them in accordance with IFRIC 4 irrespective of when the arrangement was entered into or last modified. Under U.S. GAAP, EITF 01-08, “Determining Whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease”, is required to be applied only to contracts containing embedded leases which have been entered into, last modified or acquired in a business combination after January 1, 2004 (the Group's first reporting period beginning after May 28, 2003). Retroactive application of EITF 01-08 is not permitted.
Accordingly, the adjustments included in the reconciliation of consolidated shareholders' equity and consolidated net income as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006 reflect the elimination of the lease accounting impacts of embedded leases entered into, last modified or acquired in a business combination prior to December 31, 2003.
(d) Deferred income tax effect on adjustments
This adjustment reflects the deferred tax effects attributable to the aforementioned adjustments.
(e) Effect of minority interests on adjustments
This adjustment reflects that portion of the aforementioned adjustments attributable to the outside minority interests of subsidiaries for those adjustments that impact subsidiaries with minority interests.
33
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
(f) Other presentation differences
The major reclassifications, adjusting the IFRS presentation to conform to U.S. GAAP, are as follows:
Deferred income taxes
Under IFRS, current deferred tax assets and current deferred tax liabilities are presented as non-current items in the balance sheet. Under U.S. GAAP, current deferred tax assets and current deferred tax liabilities are presented within the current assets and current liabilities, respectfully, in the balance sheet.
Classification of accreted interest
Under IFRS, the interest component of discounted obligations is presented as part of interest. Under U.S. GAAP the interest component of discounted obligations is presented as part of cost of sales.
Deferred financing costs
Under IFRS, borrowings are recognized in the balance sheet net of issuance related costs. Under U.S. GAAP, issuance related costs are recognized in the balance sheet as an asset.
Pension costs
Under IFRS, the Company has classified the interest component and the expected return on plan assets component of net periodic pension cost as a financial expense in the consolidated statement of income. Under U.S. GAAP, the interest component and the expected return on plan assets component of net periodic pension costs is included within the operating expense section of the consolidated statement of income.
(g) Other disclosures required by U.S. GAAP
Variable interest entities
The Company holds a 49% equity interest in Cia Hispano-Brasileira de Pelotizacao SA, a VIE that is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Cia Hispano-Brasileira de Pelotizacao SA was established in 1974 with Companhia Vale do Rio Doce for the production and sale of iron ore pellets, destined mainly for the shareholders and related parties. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, the VIE has total assets of approximately $172 million and reported sales and earnings before interest and taxes of $309 million and $51 million, respectively. The exposure to loss as a result of involvement with the VIE is limited to the Company’s equity and financing interests.
The Company holds a 10% equity interest in Traxys SA, Bertrange (“Traxys”), a VIE that is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Traxys was established as a joint venture in 2002 between Arcelor International S.A. and Umicore Marketing Services S.A. for the sourcing, trading, marketing and distribution of non-ferrous metals, ferro-alloys, minerals and industrial raw materials. In January 2006, following a management buy-out, the Company’s interest in Traxys was reduced from 50% to 10%. As of and for the year ended November 30, 2006, the VIE has total assets of approximately $760 million and reported sales and earnings before interest and taxes of $2,862 million and $62 million, respectively. The exposure to loss as a result of involvement with the VIE is limited to the Company’s equity and financing interests.
(h) Pro Forma U.S. GAAP earnings per share
Under U.S. GAAP, basic earnings-per-share is calculated by dividing the net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period, and diluted earnings-per-share is calculated by adjusting both the numerator and denominator used for the calculation of basic earnings-per-share for instruments that provide holders with potential access to the capital of the Company, whether they are issued by the Company itself or by one of its subsidiaries. The dilution is calculated, instrument-by-instrument, taking into account the conditions existing at the balance sheet date, and excluding anti-dilutive instruments.
34
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following table sets out the calculation of pro forma basic and diluted earnings-per-share (in millions), as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, for the year ended December 31, 2006:
| December 31, 2006 | |||
| Pro forma U.S. GAAP net income available to common shareholders |
$ | 8,078 | |
| Pro forma U.S. GAAP net income available to common shareholders and assumed conversion |
8,078 | ||
| Pro forma weighted average common shares outstanding (in millions): |
1,419 | ||
| Plus: Incremental shares from assumed exercise of stock options |
1 | ||
| Pro forma weighted average common shares assuming conversion |
1,420 | ||
| Pro forma U.S. GAAP earnings per share (Class A and Class B): |
|||
| Basic |
$5.69 | ||
| Diluted |
5.68 | ||
35
Table of Contents
MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND DATA
ArcelorMittal shares do not currently trade on any stock exchange. All issued ArcelorMittal shares are currently held by Mittal Steel.
Mittal Steel class A common shares are listed and traded on the NYSE (symbol “MT”), are admitted to trading on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s regulated market and listed on the Official List of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange (symbol “MTL”) and are admitted to listing and trading on Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V. (symbol “MT”), Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A. (symbol “MTP”), Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV (symbol “MTBL”) and the Spanish exchanges (symbol “MTS”).
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices per share of Mittal Steel class A common shares as reported on these exchanges.
| NYSE Mittal Steel Class A Common Shares |
Euronext Amsterdam Mittal Steel Class A Common Shares |
Euronext Paris Mittal Steel Class A Common Shares | ||||||||||||
| High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||
| (in U.S. dollars) | (in euros) | (in euros) | ||||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2002 |
$3.10 | $1.26 | €3.25 | €1.51 | — | — | ||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2003 |
9.06 | 2.05 | 7.50 | 2.05 | — | — | ||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2004 |
42.80 | 6.80 | 32.45 | 5.20 | — | — | ||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2005 |
||||||||||||||
| First Quarter |
43.86 | 29.70 | 33.25 | 22.55 | — | — | ||||||||
| Second Quarter |
34.00 | 22.11 | 26.10 | 17.31 | — | — | ||||||||
| Third Quarter |
30.78 | 23.55 | 25.34 | 19.00 | — | — | ||||||||
| Fourth Quarter |
29.54 | 22.95 | 25.60 | 19.25 | — | — | ||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2006 |
||||||||||||||
| First Quarter |
39.75 | 26.72 | 32.58 | 22.05 | — | — | ||||||||
| Second Quarter |
42.81 | 28.80 | 32.99 | 22.50 | — | — | ||||||||
| Third Quarter |
35.09 | 27.79 | 28.14 | 21.82 | € | 28.16 | € | 23.00 | ||||||
| Fourth Quarter |
43.67 | 33.90 | 34.95 | 26.91 | 35.00 | 26.67 | ||||||||
| Month ended |
||||||||||||||
| November 2006 |
43.39 | 40.12 | 34.20 | 30.83 | 34.21 | 30.83 | ||||||||
| December 2006 |
43.67 | 40.03 | 33.00 | 30.12 | 33.00 | 30.10 | ||||||||
| January 2007 |
47.57 | 39.59 | 36.32 | 30.02 | 36.32 | 30.02 | ||||||||
| February 2007 |
54.05 | 46.45 | 41.03 | 35.80 | 41.03 | 35.80 | ||||||||
| March 2007 |
54.35 | 48.89 | 41.00 | 36.87 | 41.00 | 36.86 | ||||||||
| April 2007 |
55.49 | 52.50 | 41.49 | 38.15 | 41.49 | 38.15 | ||||||||
| May 2007 |
59.99 | 52.95 | 44.62 | 39.70 | 44.63 | 39.69 | ||||||||
36
Table of Contents
Note: Includes intraday highs and lows.
| Luxembourg Stock Exchange Mittal Steel Class A Common Shares |
Euronext Brussels Mittal Steel Class A Common Shares |
Spanish Exchanges(1) Mittal Steel Class A Common Shares | ||||||||||||||||
| High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||
| (in euros) | (in euros) | (in euros) | ||||||||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2002 |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2003 |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2004 |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||
| First Quarter |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Second Quarter |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Third Quarter |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Fourth Quarter |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2006 |
||||||||||||||||||
| First Quarter |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Second Quarter |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Third Quarter |
€ | 27.35 | € | 24.50 | € | 28.10 | € | 24.60 | € | 28.03 | € | 24.00 | ||||||
| Fourth Quarter |
35.00 | 27.00 | 34.84 | 26.90 | 34.85 | 26.65 | ||||||||||||
| Month ended |
||||||||||||||||||
| November 2006 |
33.50 | 30.90 | 33.56 | 30.95 | 34.09 | 30.82 | ||||||||||||
| December 2006 |
32.95 | 30.44 | 33.18 | 30.20 | 33.00 | 30.07 | ||||||||||||
| January 2007 |
36.00 | 30.60 | 36.00 | 30.10 | 36.31 | 30.12 | ||||||||||||
| February 2007 |
40.10 | 35.95 | 40.74 | 35.67 | 41.03 | 35.80 | ||||||||||||
| March 2007 |
40.90 | 37.20 | 41.17 | 36.75 | 40.40 | 36.86 | ||||||||||||
| April 2007 |
41.25 | 39.00 | 41.59 | 36.75 | 41.47 | 38.80 | ||||||||||||
| May 2007 |
44.50 | 39.33 | 44.23 | 39.61 | 43.92 | 39.24 | ||||||||||||
| (1) |
Spanish stock exchanges in Madrid, Barcelona, Bilbao and Valencia (“MTS”). |
Note:
| • | Includes intraday highs and lows. |
| • | Mittal Steel class A common shares were listed on Euronext Paris and the Spanish exchanges on July 27, 2006 and on Euronext Brussels and the Official List of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange on August 1, 2006. |
No dividends have been declared or paid by ArcelorMittal since its incorporation.
On September 27, 2006, Mittal Steel announced that its Board of Directors had agreed upon a new dividend and cash distribution policy, and this policy was approved at Mittal Steel’s annual general meeting of shareholders on June 12, 2007. The new policy aims to return 30% of Mittal Steel’s prior year’s annual net income to shareholders every year through an annual base dividend, supplemented by share buy-backs. Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors proposed an annual base dividend of $1.30 per share. This base dividend has been designed to provide a minimum payout per year and would rise in order to reflect Mittal Steel’s underlying growth. Payment of this dividend will be made on a quarterly basis. Payment of the installments occurring after the effectiveness of the first-step merger or the second-step merger will be made by ArcelorMittal or Arcelor, as applicable. Any such dividends may be subject to Luxembourg withholding tax. Please see “Taxation—Luxembourg Tax Considerations”.
In addition to this cash dividend, Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors approved a share buy-back program tailored to achieve the 30% distribution pay-out commitment. Based on the annual net income announced for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, Mittal Steel will implement a $590 million share buy-back.
37
Table of Contents
On February 2, 2007, Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors declared an interim dividend of $0.325 per share payable on March 15, 2007. This dividend has since been paid.
Further to the September 27, 2006 announcement described above, Mittal Steel announced on April 2, 2007, the commencement of a share buy-back program to repurchase up to a maximum aggregate amount of $590 million of its class A common shares. The share buy-back program will end at the earliest of (i) December 31, 2007, (ii) the moment on which the aggregate value of class A common shares repurchased by Mittal Steel since the start of this share buy-back program reaches $590 million, or (iii) the moment on which Mittal Steel and its subsidiaries hold 10% of the total number of the then-issued class A and class B common shares.
On June 12, 2007, Mittal Steel announced its intention to start a share buy-back program for up to a maximum of 27 million class A common shares, immediately following the completion of the $590 million share buy-back program summarized above. This new share buy-back program is designed to offset the issuance of shares as partial consideration for the acquisition of the outstanding minority interests in Arcelor Brasil, described under “Presentation of Certain Financial and Other Information—Recent Developments”. All necessary corporate actions will be taken at the level of ArcelorMittal in order to allow the continuation by ArcelorMittal of the Mittal Steel share buy-back programs (the ongoing $590 million program and the announced subsequent 27 million share program) following effectiveness of the merger.
The holders of Mittal Steel class A common shares and Mittal Steel class B common shares are entitled to receive pro rata distributions, if any, as may be declared by Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors out of funds legally available for distribution. Any determination to pay cash dividends is at the discretion of Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors, in accordance with Dutch law and Mittal Steel’s articles of association, and after taking into account various factors, including Mittal Steel’s financial condition, results of operations, outstanding indebtedness, current and anticipated cash needs, plans for expansion, commercial restrictions and other factors affecting Mittal Steel’s operating subsidiaries.
38
Table of Contents
COMPARATIVE PER-SHARE INFORMATION
ArcelorMittal was incorporated on August 13, 2004 under the name Verger Investments S.A. It has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mittal Steel since April 24, 2007. ArcelorMittal has not conducted, and will not conduct prior to effectiveness of the merger, any operations or hold any material assets, or incur any material liabilities prior to such time and ArcelorMittal will have a number of issued and outstanding shares after the merger equal to the number of outstanding shares in Mittal Steel immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, such that the merger will have no impact on the per share information of Mittal Steel.
39
Table of Contents
In addition to the other information included in this proxy statement/prospectus, including the matters addressed under “Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements”, you should carefully consider the following risks before deciding whether to vote to adopt the merger of Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum. You should also consider the other information in this proxy statement/prospectus and the other documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, including the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, copies of which are attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B. See “Where You Can Find More Information”.
The Significant shareholder has the ability to exercise significant influence over the outcome of Mittal Steel’s shareholder votes.
As of May 31, 2007, Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal directly and indirectly owned 623,598,333 of Mittal Steel’s outstanding common shares, representing approximately 45% of Mittal Steel’s outstanding voting equity. After the merger, the Significant shareholder will own the same percentage of the outstanding ArcelorMittal shares. Consequently, the Significant shareholder has the ability to influence significantly the decisions adopted at Mittal Steel’s shareholder meetings, including matters regarding the merger at the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting. In addition, after the merger, the Significant shareholder will have the ability to significantly influence the decisions adopted at ArcelorMittal’s shareholders meeting including a change of control of ArcelorMittal. The Significant shareholder has stated that it intends to vote for the decision to merge as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum.
Because the market price of ArcelorMittal shares will fluctuate, the value of ArcelorMittal shares to be issued in the merger will fluctuate.
Upon effectiveness of the merger, every one Mittal Steel share will be automatically exchanged for one newly issued ArcelorMittal share. Accordingly, the market value of the ArcelorMittal shares that Mittal Steel shareholders will receive upon effectiveness of the merger is expected to depend largely on the market value of the Mittal Steel shares at the effective time of the merger and could vary significantly from the market value of the Mittal Steel shares on the date of this document or the date of the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting.
These variations could be the result of changes in the business, operations or prospects of Mittal Steel, regulatory considerations, general market and economic conditions and other factors both within and beyond the control of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal. Because the effectiveness of the merger will occur after the date of the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting, Mittal Steel shareholders will not know at the time of the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting the market value of the ArcelorMittal shares they will receive upon effectiveness of the merger.
Risks Related to ArcelorMittal
Mittal Steel has experienced rapid growth through acquisitions in a relatively short period of time. The failure to manage this growth could significantly harm ArcelorMittal’s future results and require significant expenditures to address the additional operational and control requirements of this growth.
Mittal Steel has experienced rapid growth and development through acquisitions in a relatively short period of time and may continue to pursue acquisitions in order to meet its strategic objectives. Such growth entails significant investment and increased operating costs. Overall growth in Mittal Steel’s business also requires greater allocation of management resources away from daily operations. In addition, managing this growth (including managing multiple operating assets) requires, among other things, the continued development of Mittal Steel’s financial and management information control systems, the ability to integrate newly acquired assets with existing operations, the ability to attract and retain sufficient numbers of qualified management and other personnel, the continued training and supervision of such personnel and the ability to manage the risks and liabilities associated with the acquired businesses. Failure to manage such growth, while at the same time maintaining adequate focus on its existing assets, could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
40
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal may not achieve the expected synergies from Mittal Steel’s recent significant acquisitions, including the acquisitions of Arcelor, ISG (now Mittal Steel USA) and Sicartsa.
ArcelorMittal expects to achieve synergies from Mittal Steel’s acquisitions by integrating the acquired companies with its operations. Integrating the operations of acquired businesses is a complex and ongoing process. Successful integration and the achievement of synergies require, among other things, the satisfactory coordination of business development and procurement efforts, manufacturing improvements, employee retention, hiring and training policies and the alignment of products, sales and marketing operations and information and software systems. The diversion of the attention of ArcelorMittal’s management to the integration effort and any difficulties encountered in combining operations could result in higher integration costs and lower savings than expected.
Mittal Steel announced at the time of the acquisition of ISG that it expected to achieve cost synergies of approximately $250 million per annum by 2007 relating to purchasing, manufacturing, operating and other improvements, including inventory reduction, reduced capital expenditures and contract-related improvements in productivity. In connection with its acquisition of Sicartsa, Mittal Steel announced that it expects to achieve approximately $80 million of industrial synergies and approximately $50 million of commercial, procurement and selling, general and administrative efficiencies.
If ArcelorMittal does not achieve the announced synergies from any or all of its recent acquisitions, including those from the Arcelor acquisition discussed below, to the fullest extent or within the timeframe expected, this could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations.
Mittal Steel and Arcelor may not successfully integrate their business operations, which could result in ArcelorMittal’s failure to realize anticipated cost savings, revenue enhancements and other benefits expected from the acquisition.
Mittal Steel acquired Arcelor, a company of approximately equivalent size, with the expectation that, among other things, the acquisition would enable Mittal Steel and Arcelor to consolidate support functions, optimize their supply chain and procurement structure, and leverage their research and development services across a larger base in order to achieve cost savings and revenue synergies, as well as other synergistic benefits. In connection with its acquisition of Arcelor, Mittal Steel announced that it expected to achieve synergies of $1.6 billion by the end of 2008, primarily from purchasing, marketing and trading and manufacturing efficiencies. These synergies may not be achieved to the fullest extent or within the timeframe expected, which could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s results of operations.
Achieving the benefits of the acquisition will depend in part upon meeting the challenges inherent in the successful integration of global business enterprises of the size and scope of Mittal Steel and Arcelor. Mittal Steel and Arcelor must successfully integrate, among other things, product offerings, research and development, customer service functions, sales and marketing, administrative functions, management information systems and financial control and reporting systems. The integration of these functions could interfere with the activities of one or more of the businesses of Mittal Steel and Arcelor and may divert management’s attention from the daily operations of Mittal Steel’s and Arcelor’s core businesses.
Among the challenges in integrating Mittal Steel’s and Arcelor’s business operations are demonstrating to their respective customers that the acquisition will not result in an adverse change in business focus and persuading each company’s personnel that the companies’ respective business cultures are compatible. In addition, each company currently operates in locations in which the other company does not. Therefore, to integrate successfully both companies’ operations, the combined company will need to retain management, key employees and business partners of both companies. If Mittal Steel and Arcelor are unable to integrate effectively their operations, technologies and personnel in a timely and efficient manner, then they may not realize the benefits expected from the acquisition. In particular, if the integration is not successful, ArcelorMittal’s operating results may be harmed, ArcelorMittal may lose key personnel and key customers, ArcelorMittal may not be able to retain or expand its market position, and the market price of ArcelorMittal’s shares may decline.
The Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Mittal Steel has for over a quarter of a century contributed significantly to shaping and implementing Mittal Steel’s business strategy, and the loss or diminution of his services to ArcelorMittal could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s business and prospects.
The Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Mittal Steel has for over a quarter of a century contributed significantly to shaping and implementing Mittal Steel’s business strategy. His strategic
41
Table of Contents
vision was instrumental in the creation of the world’s largest and most global steel group. The loss or any diminution of his services to ArcelorMittal could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s business and prospects. ArcelorMittal does not intend to maintain key-man life insurance on its Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer.
Mittal Steel increased substantially its outstanding debt in connection with its acquisition of Arcelor, which lowered its credit rating. Cyclical downturns in the steel industry could also lead to credit rating downgrades. Credit rating downgrades could significantly harm ArcelorMittal’s refinancing capacity, increase its costs of funding and limit its flexibility in managing its business.
Mittal Steel’s debt levels increased significantly during 2006, primarily as the result of financing incurred in connection with its acquisition of Arcelor (and Arcelor’s prior acquisition of Dofasco). As of December 31, 2006, Mittal Steel had total debt outstanding of $26.6 billion, consisting of $4.9 billion of short-term indebtedness (including payables to banks and the current portion of long-term debt) and $21.6 billion of long-term indebtedness. As of December 31, 2006, Mittal Steel had $6.1 billion of cash and cash equivalents, including short-term investments and restricted cash, and for the year ended December 31, 2006, Mittal Steel recorded operating income of $7.5 billion.
Following the announcement of the final results of Mittal Steel’s offer for Arcelor, on July 26, 2006 Standard & Poor’s Rating Services lowered its long-term corporate credit rating on Mittal Steel from “BBB+” to “BBB” and removed the rating from credit watch with negative implications. On July 31, 2006, Moody’s Investors Service confirmed the Baa3 ratings of Mittal Steel. On September 26, 2006, Fitch Ratings affirmed Mittal Steel’s issuer default and senior unsecured ratings at “BBB” and short-term rating at “F2” and removed the ratings from negative rating watch. Credit rating downgrades could also result from a cyclical downturn in the steel industry, as Mittal Steel has experienced in the past. Any decline in its credit rating would increase ArcelorMittal’s cost of borrowing and could significantly harm its financial condition, results of operations and profitability, including its ability to refinance its existing indebtedness.
Mittal Steel’s level of indebtedness and its guarantees of the debt of its subsidiaries may limit ArcelorMittal’s flexibility in managing its business.
Mittal Steel’s principal financing facilities (that is, the $3.2 billion term and revolving credit facility, which was amended on February 6, 2007 (the “2005 Credit Facility”), the $800 million committed multi-currency letter of credit facility (the “Letter of Credit Facility”) and the €17 billion (approximately $22 billion) term and revolving credit facility entered into on November 30, 2006 (the “€17 Billion Facility”)), contain provisions that limit encumbrances on the assets of Mittal Steel and its subsidiaries and limit the ability of Mittal Steel’s subsidiaries to incur debt. The Letter of Credit Facility requires compliance with a minimum interest coverage ratio. The 2005 Credit Facility and the €17 Billion Facility require compliance with a maximum gearing ratio. Limitations arising from these credit facilities could adversely affect Mittal Steel’s ability to maintain its dividend policy and make additional strategic acquisitions.
A portion of Mittal Steel’s working capital financing consists of uncommitted lines of credit, which may be cancelled by the lenders in certain circumstances. The level of debt outstanding could have important adverse consequences to Mittal Steel, including impairing its ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, general corporate purposes or other purposes, and limiting its flexibility to adjust to changing market conditions or withstand competitive pressures, resulting in greater vulnerability to a downturn in general economic conditions.
Mittal Steel had, as of December 31, 2006, guaranteed $644 million of debt of its operating subsidiaries. As of March 9, 2007, Mittal Steel had guaranteed an additional $500 million of debt of its operating subsidiaries. In addition, Mittal Steel had, as of December 31, 2006, guaranteed approximately $26 million of certain debts at its joint venture I/N Tek. Mittal Steel’s debt facilities and its guarantees have provisions whereby a default by any borrower within the Mittal Steel group could, under certain circumstances, lead to defaults under other Mittal Steel credit facilities. Any possible invocation of these cross-default clauses could cause some or all of the other guaranteed debt to accelerate, creating severe liquidity pressures.
Furthermore, most of Mittal Steel’s current borrowings are at variable rates of interest and thereby expose Mittal Steel to interest rate risk. Generally, Mittal Steel does not use financial instruments to hedge a significant portion of its interest rate exposure. If interest rates rise, Mittal Steel’s debt service obligations on its variable rate indebtedness would increase even if the amount borrowed remained the same, resulting in higher interest costs.
42
Table of Contents
A substantial portion of Mittal Steel’s debt is denominated in euro. Accordingly, Mittal Steel is exposed to fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the euro. Any such fluctuations in the euro and, in particular, a marked appreciation of the euro to the U.S. dollar, could harm ArcelorMittal’s financial position significantly.
ArcelorMittal may not generate or obtain sufficient funds to meet the significant capital expenditure commitments and other commitments Mittal Steel has made in connection with certain acquisitions.
In connection with the acquisition of some of its operating subsidiaries, Mittal Steel has made significant capital expenditure commitments and other commitments with various governmental bodies involving expenditures required to be made over the next few years. In 2006, capital expenditures for Mittal Steel amounted to $2.9 billion. As of December 31, 2006, Mittal Steel and its subsidiaries had capital commitments outstanding of approximately $3.3 billion under privatization and other major contracts. ArcelorMittal expects to fund these capital expenditure commitments and other commitments primarily through internal sources, but ArcelorMittal cannot assure you that it will be able to generate or obtain sufficient funds to meet these requirements or to complete these projects on a timely basis or at all. In addition, completion of these projects may be affected by factors that are beyond the control of ArcelorMittal.
Mittal Steel has also made commitments relating to employees at some of its operating subsidiaries. It has agreed, in connection with the acquisition of interests in these subsidiaries, including the acquisition of Arcelor, that it will not make collective dismissals for certain periods. These periods generally extend several years following the date of acquisition. The inability to make such dismissals may affect ArcelorMittal’s ability to coordinate its workforce and efficiently manage its business in response to changing market conditions in the areas affected.
ArcelorMittal may not be able to remain in compliance with some or all of these requirements in the future. Failure to remain in compliance may result in forfeiture of part of Mittal Steel’s investment and/or the loss of tax and regulatory benefits.
Because ArcelorMittal will be a holding company, it will depend on the earnings and cash flows of its operating subsidiaries, which may not be sufficient to meet future needs.
Because ArcelorMittal will be a holding company, it will be dependent on the earnings and cash flows of, and dividends and distributions from, its operating subsidiaries to pay expenses, meet its debt service obligations, and pay any cash dividends or distributions on its shares. Some of these operating subsidiaries have debt outstanding or are subject to acquisition agreements that impose restrictions or prohibitions on such operating subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends.
Under the laws of Luxembourg, ArcelorMittal will be able to pay dividends or distributions only to the extent that it is entitled to receive cash dividend distributions from its subsidiaries, recognize gains from the sale of its assets or record share premium from the issuance of shares.
Some of Mittal Steel’s subsidiaries benefited from state aid granted prior to, or in connection with, their respective privatizations, the granting of which is subject to transitional arrangements under the respective treaties concerning the accession of these countries to the European Union. Non-fulfillment or breach of the transitional arrangements and related rules may result in the recovery of aid granted pursuant to the transitional arrangements.
Mittal Steel has acquired formerly state-owned companies in the Czech Republic, Poland and Romania, some of which benefited from state aid granted prior to, or in connection with, their respective privatization and restructuring. Moreover, the restructuring of the steel industries in each of the Czech Republic, Poland and Romania is subject to transitional arrangements and related rules that determine the legality of restructuring aid. The transitional arrangements form part of the respective treaties concerning the accession of the Czech Republic, Poland and Romania to the European Union.
Non-fulfillment or breach of the transitional arrangements and related rules may nullify the effect of the transitional arrangements and may result in the recovery of aid pursuant to the transitional arrangements that have been breached.
43
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal’s mining operations will be subject to mining risks.
ArcelorMittal’s mining operations will be subject to hazards and risks normally associated with the exploration, development and production of natural resources, any of which could result in production shortfalls or damage to persons or property. In particular, hazards associated with open-pit mining operations include, among others:
| • | flooding of the open pit; |
| • | collapse of the open-pit wall; |
| • | accidents associated with the operation of large open-pit mining and rock transportation equipment; |
| • | accidents associated with the preparation and ignition of large-scale open-pit blasting operations; |
| • | production disruptions due to weather; and |
| • | hazards associated with the disposal of mineralized waste water, such as groundwater and waterway contamination. |
Hazards associated with underground mining operations include, among others:
| • | underground fires and explosions, including those caused by flammable gas; |
| • | cave-ins or ground falls; |
| • | discharges of gases and toxic chemicals; |
| • | flooding; |
| • | sinkhole formation and ground subsidence; |
| • | other accidents and conditions resulting from drilling; and |
| • | blasting and removing, and processing material from, an underground mine. |
ArcelorMittal will be at risk of experiencing any or all of these hazards. For example, in September 2006, a methane gas explosion at Mittal Steel’s Lenina mine in Kazakhstan resulted in 41 fatalities and a shutdown of the mine for two days. The occurrence of any of these hazards could delay production, increase production costs and result in death or injury to persons, damage to property and liability for ArcelorMittal, some or all of which may not be covered by insurance.
Under-funding of pension and other post-retirement benefit plans at some of Mittal Steel’s operating subsidiaries, and the possible need to make substantial cash contributions to pension plans, which may increase in the future, may reduce the cash available for ArcelorMittal’s business.
Mittal Steel’s principal operating subsidiaries in Canada, France, Germany, Trinidad, the United States, South Africa and Ukraine provide defined benefit pension plans to their employees. Some of these plans are currently under-funded. At December 31, 2006, the value of Mittal Steel USA’s pension plan assets was $2,335 million, while the projected benefit obligation was $3,075 million, resulting in a deficit of $740 million. At December 31, 2006, the value of the pension plan assets of Mittal Steel’s Canadian subsidiaries was $2,193 million, while the projected benefit obligation $2,730 million, resulting in a deficit of $537 million. At December 31, 2006, the value of the pension plan assets of Mittal Steel’s European subsidiaries was $551 million, while the projected benefit obligation was $2,228 million, resulting in a deficit of $1,677 million. Mittal Steel USA also had an under-funded post-employment benefit obligation of $1,137 million relating to life insurance and medical benefits as of December 31, 2006. Mittal Steel’s Canadian subsidiaries also had an under-funded post-employment benefit obligation of $934 million relating to life insurance and medical benefits as of December 31, 2006. Mittal Steel’s European subsidiaries also had an under-funded post-employment benefit obligation of $459 million relating to life insurance and medical benefits as of December 31, 2006.
Mittal Steel’s funding obligations depend upon future asset performance, the level of interest rates used to measure ERISA minimum funding levels, actuarial assumptions and experience, changes negotiated with unions and future government regulation. Because of the large number of variables that determine pension funding requirements, which are difficult to predict, as well as any legislative action, future cash funding requirements for Mittal Steel’s pension plans and other post-employment benefit plans could be significantly higher than currently estimated amounts. These funding requirements could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
44
Table of Contents
ArcelorMittal could experience labor disputes that could disrupt its operations and its relationships with its customers.
A majority of the employees of Mittal Steel are represented by labor unions and are covered by collective bargaining or similar agreements, which are subject to periodic renegotiation. Strikes or work stoppages could occur prior to, or during, the negotiations leading to new collective bargaining agreements, during wage and benefits negotiations or during other periods for other reasons. Any such breakdown leading to work stoppage and disruption of operations could have an adverse effect on the operations and financial results of ArcelorMittal. For example, steel workers at Mittal Steel’s Lázaro Cárdenas production facilities went on strike on two occasions in the period of February to April of 2006 following the removal of the steel workers’ union leader by the Mexican government and during 2006 Mittal Steel experienced various other strikes of limited duration.
Additionally, many of the contractors working at Mittal Steel’s operating subsidiaries’ plants employ workers who are represented by various trade unions. Disruptions with these contractors could significantly disrupt ArcelorMittal’s operations and harm its financial results and its relationships with its customers.
Prior to Mittal Steel’s acquisition of Arcelor, representatives of various unions representing Arcelor employees made statements critical of the acquisition. Although no union of Arcelor has yet gone on strike, ArcelorMittal may still be subject to strikes and other labor actions by Arcelor employees that would disrupt ArcelorMittal’s operations and prevent it from achieving the anticipated synergies and efficiencies arising from the acquisition.
ArcelorMittal will be subject to economic risks and uncertainties in the countries in which it will operate. Any deterioration or disruption of the economic environment in those countries could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
Over the past few years, many of the countries in which Mittal Steel operates, or proposes to operate, have experienced economic growth and improved economic stability. For example, Eastern European countries, such as Poland, the Czech Republic and Romania, have initiated free-market economic reforms in connection with, or in anticipation of, their accession to the European Union. Others, such as Algeria, Argentina and South Africa, have attempted to reinforce political stability and improve economic performance after recent periods of political instability. Ukraine and Kazakhstan have implemented free-market economic reforms. Mittal Steel’s business strategy was developed partly on the assumption that such economic growth and the modernization, restructuring and upgrading of the physical infrastructure in these countries will continue, thus creating increased demand for Mittal Steel’s steel products and maintaining a stable level of steel prices both in these countries and in other key product markets. While the demand in these countries for steel and steel products has gradually increased, this trend will not necessarily continue. In addition, the legal systems in some of the countries in which ArcelorMittal will operate remain underdeveloped, particularly with respect to bankruptcy proceedings, and the prospect of widespread bankruptcy, mass unemployment and the deterioration of various sectors of these economies still exists. Reform policies may not continue to be implemented and, if implemented, may not be successful. In addition, these countries may not remain receptive to foreign trade and investment. Any slowdown in the development of these economies or any reduction in the investment budgets of governmental agencies and companies responsible for the modernization of such physical infrastructure could also have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
ArcelorMittal will be subject to political, social and legal uncertainties in some of the developing countries in which it will operate. Any disruption or volatility in the political or social environment in those countries could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
Mittal Steel operates in a number of developing countries. Some of these countries, such as Romania and Ukraine, have been undergoing substantial political transformations from centrally controlled command economies to pluralist market-oriented democracies. Political and economic reforms necessary to complete such transformation may not continue. On occasion, ethnic, religious, historical and other divisions have given rise to tensions and, in certain cases, widescale civil disturbances and military conflict, as in Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Liberia and South Africa. The political systems in these and other developing countries may be vulnerable to the populations’ dissatisfaction with reforms, social and ethnic unrest and changes in governmental policies, any of which could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects and its ability to continue to do business in these countries.
45
Table of Contents
In addition, ArcelorMittal may encounter difficulties in enforcing court judgments or arbitral awards in some countries in which it will operate because those countries may not be parties to treaties that recognize the mutual enforcement of court judgments.
ArcelorMittal could experience currency fluctuations and become subject to exchange controls that could adversely affect its business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
Mittal Steel operates and sells products in a number of countries, and, as a result, ArcelorMittal’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects could be adversely affected by fluctuations in exchange rates. Major changes in exchange rates, particularly changes in the value of the U.S. dollar against the currencies of countries in which Mittal Steel operates, could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
Some operations involving the South African rand, Kazakh tenge, Brazilian real, Argentine peso, Algerian dinar and Ukrainian hryvnia are subject to limitations imposed by their respective central banks. The imposition of exchange controls or other similar restrictions on currency convertibility in the countries in which Mittal Steel operates could adversely affect ArcelorMittal’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
Disruptions to ArcelorMittal’s manufacturing processes could adversely affect ArcelorMittal’s operations, customer service levels and financial results.
Steel manufacturing processes are dependent on critical steel-making equipment, such as furnaces, continuous casters, rolling mills and electrical equipment (such as transformers), and such equipment may incur downtime as a result of unanticipated failures or other events, such as fires or furnace breakdowns. Mittal Steel’s manufacturing plants have experienced, and may in the future experience, plant shutdowns or periods of reduced production as a result of such equipment failures or other events. To the extent that lost production as a result of such a disruption could not be compensated for by unaffected facilities, such disruptions could have an adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s operations, customer service levels and financial results.
Natural disasters could significantly damage ArcelorMittal’s production facilities.
Natural disasters could significantly damage ArcelorMittal’s production facilities and general infrastructure. In particular, Mittal Steel Lázaro Cárdenas’ production facilities are located in Lázaro Cárdenas, Michoacan, Mexico, and Mittal Steel Temirtau is located in the Karaganda region of the Republic of Kazakhstan, both of which are areas that have historically experienced earthquakes of varying magnitude. Extensive damage to either facility, or any other major production complexes, whether as a result of an earthquake or other natural disaster, could, to the extent that lost production as a result of such a disaster could not be compensated for by unaffected facilities, severely affect ArcelorMittal’s ability to conduct its business operations and, as a result, reduce its future operating results.
ArcelorMittal’s insurance policies will provide limited coverage, potentially leaving it uninsured against some business risks.
The occurrence of an event that is uninsurable or not fully insured could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects. ArcelorMittal will maintain insurance on property and equipment in amounts believed to be consistent with industry practices but it may not be fully insured against some business risks. ArcelorMittal’s insurance policies will cover physical loss or damage to its property and equipment on a reinstatement basis arising from a number of specified risks and certain consequential losses, including business interruption arising from the occurrence of an insured event under its policies. Arcelor maintains similar coverage, which eventually will be consolidated under appropriate groupwide policies at the time of their renewal. Under these policies, damages and losses caused by some natural disasters, such as earthquakes, floods and windstorms, will also be covered. The coverage for Arcelor’s plants is similar to the coverage for Mittal Steel’s plants, except as to natural hazards, earthquakes and windstorms, for which Arcelor relies on self insurance where external insurance cover is not legally required, as its exposure to those risks is considered to be limited.
Each of the operating subsidiaries of ArcelorMittal also will maintain various other types of insurance, such as workmen’s compensation insurance and marine insurance. Notwithstanding the insurance coverage that ArcelorMittal and its subsidiaries will carry, the occurrence of an accident that causes losses in excess of limits specified under the relevant policy, or losses arising from events not covered by insurance policies, could materially harm ArcelorMittal’s financial condition and future operating results.
46
Table of Contents
Product liability claims could adversely affect ArcelorMittal’s operations.
Mittal Steel sells products to major manufacturers who are engaged to sell a wide range of end products. Furthermore, Mittal Steel’s products are also sold to, and used in, certain safety-critical applications. If ArcelorMittal were to sell steel that is inconsistent with the specifications of the order or the requirements of the application, significant disruptions to the customer’s production lines could result. There could also be significant consequential damages resulting from the use of such products. ArcelorMittal will have a limited amount of product liability insurance coverage, and a major claim for damages related to products sold could leave ArcelorMittal uninsured against a portion or all of the award and, as a result, materially harm its financial condition and future operating results.
International trade actions or regulations and trade-related legal proceedings could reduce or eliminate ArcelorMittal’s access to steel markets.
Mittal Steel has international operations and makes sales throughout the world, and, therefore, its businesses have significant exposure to the effects of trade actions and barriers. Various countries, including the United States and Canada, have in the past instituted, or are currently contemplating the institution of, trade actions and barriers.
Mittal Steel cannot predict the timing and nature of similar or other trade actions by the United States, Canada or any other country. Because of the international nature of these operations, ArcelorMittal could be affected by any trade actions or restrictions introduced by any country in which it sells, or has the potential to sell, its products. Any such trade actions could materially and adversely affect ArcelorMittal’s business by reducing or eliminating ArcelorMittal’s access to steel markets.
In addition to the more general trade barriers described above, if Mittal Steel were party to a regulatory or trade-related legal proceeding that was decided adversely to it, its business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects could be adversely affected.
Significant expenditures and senior management time may be required with respect to ArcelorMittal’s internal controls to ensure compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the regulations of the SEC thereunder will require senior executive and senior financial officers of ArcelorMittal to assess on a regular basis the internal controls over financial reporting, evaluate the effectiveness of such internal controls and disclose any material weaknesses in such internal controls. ArcelorMittal’s independent registered public accounting firm will also be required to provide an attestation of management’s evaluation, including with respect to entities acquired by ArcelorMittal, some of which may have internal control weaknesses or deficiencies. The scope of management’s assessment of Mittal Steel’s internal control over financial reporting did not include an assessment of the disclosure controls and procedures for Arcelor during 2006, and management has excluded Arcelor from its assessment of the effectiveness of Mittal Steel’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. The disclosure controls and procedures for Arcelor will be included in management’s assessment as of December 31, 2007. Consequently, to the extent that Arcelor is discovered to have weak or deficient internal controls, ArcelorMittal may be required to allocate significant monetary and management resources to remedy the deficiencies and weaknesses that could otherwise be devoted to ArcelorMittal’s daily business operations.
The income tax liability of ArcelorMittal may substantially increase if the tax laws and regulations in the countries in which it will operate change or become subject to adverse interpretations or inconsistent enforcement.
Taxes payable by companies in many of the countries in which ArcelorMittal will operate are substantial and include value-added tax, excise duties, profit taxes, payroll-related taxes, property taxes and other taxes. Tax laws and regulations in some of these countries may be subject to frequent change, varying interpretation and inconsistent enforcement. Ineffective tax collection systems and continuing budget requirements may increase the likelihood of the imposition of arbitrary or onerous taxes and penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition to the usual tax burden imposed on taxpayers, these conditions create uncertainty as to the tax implications of various business decisions. This uncertainty could expose ArcelorMittal to significant fines and penalties and to enforcement measures despite its best efforts at compliance, and could result in a greater than expected tax burden.
47
Table of Contents
In addition, many of the jurisdictions in which ArcelorMittal will operate have adopted transfer pricing legislation. If tax authorities impose significant additional tax liabilities as a result of transfer pricing adjustments, it could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s financial condition and results of operations.
It is possible that taxing authorities in the countries in which ArcelorMittal will operate will introduce additional revenue raising measures. The introduction of any such provisions may affect the overall tax efficiency of ArcelorMittal and could result in significant additional taxes becoming payable. Any such additional tax exposure could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s financial condition and results of operations.
ArcelorMittal may face a significant increase in its income taxes if tax rates increase or the tax laws or regulations in the jurisdictions in which it will operate or treaties between those jurisdictions are modified in an adverse manner. This may adversely affect ArcelorMittal’s cash flows, liquidity and ability to pay dividends.
If Mittal Steel were unable to utilize fully its deferred tax assets, ArcelorMittal’s profitability could be reduced.
At December 31, 2006, Mittal Steel had $1,670 million recorded as deferred tax assets on its balance sheet. These assets can be utilized only if, and only to the extent that, Mittal Steel’s operating subsidiaries generate adequate levels of taxable income in future periods to offset the tax loss carry forwards and reverse the temporary differences before they expire.
At December 31, 2006, the amount of future income required to recover Mittal Steel’s deferred tax assets was approximately $5,278 million at certain operating subsidiaries. For each of the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006, these operating subsidiaries generated approximately 62% and 43%, respectively, of Mittal Steel’s consolidated income before tax of $4,676 million and $7,195 million respectively.
Mittal Steel’s ability to generate taxable income is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond its control. If Mittal Steel generates lower taxable income than the amount it has assumed in determining its deferred tax assets, then the value of deferred tax assets will be reduced.
U.S. investors may have difficulty enforcing civil liabilities against ArcelorMittal and its directors and senior management.
ArcelorMittal will be organized under the laws of Luxembourg with its principal executive offices and corporate seat in Luxembourg. The majority of ArcelorMittal’s directors and senior management will be residents of jurisdictions outside the United States. The majority of ArcelorMittal’s assets and the assets of these persons will be located outside the United States. As a result, U.S. investors may find it difficult to effect service of process within the United States upon ArcelorMittal or these persons or to enforce outside the United States judgments obtained against ArcelorMittal or these persons in U.S. courts, including actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. Likewise, it may also be difficult for an investor to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained against ArcelorMittal or these persons in courts in jurisdictions outside the United States, including actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. It may also be difficult for a U.S. investor to bring an original action in a Luxembourg court predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against ArcelorMittal’s directors and senior management and non-U.S. experts named in this proxy statement/prospectus.
Steel companies are susceptible to the cyclicality of the steel industry, making their results of operations unpredictable.
The steel industry has historically been highly cyclical and is affected significantly by general economic conditions and other factors, such as worldwide production capacity, fluctuations in steel imports/exports and tariffs. Steel prices are also sensitive to trends in cyclical industries, such as automotive, construction, appliance, machinery, equipment and transportation industries, which are the significant markets for Mittal Steel’s products. Steel markets have been experiencing larger and more pronounced cyclical fluctuations, driven recently by the substantial increase in steel production and consumption in China. This trend, combined with the rising costs of key inputs, mainly metallics, energy, transportation and logistics, presents an increasing challenge for steel producers.
48
Table of Contents
The volatility and the length and nature of business cycles affecting the steel industry have historically been unpredictable, and the recurrence of another major downturn in the industry would negatively impact ArcelorMittal’s results of operations and profitability.
Rapidly growing demand and supply of steel products in China and other developing economies may result in additional excess worldwide capacity and falling steel prices.
Over the last several years, steel consumption in China and other developing economies, such as India, has increased rapidly. Steel companies have responded by developing steel production capabilities in these countries. Steel production, especially in China, has been expanding significantly and, in 2006, China became a net exporter of steel. Excess Chinese capacity exported to Europe and the United States put downward pressure on steel prices in those markets in 2006. Because China is the largest worldwide steel producer by a large margin, any excess Chinese capacity could have a major negative impact on world steel trade and prices if excess production is continued to be exported to other markets.
ArcelorMittal could face significant price and other forms of competition from other steel producers, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
The markets in which steel companies conduct business are highly competitive. Competition could cause ArcelorMittal to lose market share, increase expenditures or reduce pricing, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects. The global steel industry has historically suffered from substantial over-capacity. This has led to substantial price decreases during periods of economic weakness that have not been offset by commensurate price increases during periods of economic strength. Excess capacity in some of the products sold by ArcelorMittal will intensify price competition for those products. This could require ArcelorMittal to reduce the price for its products and, as a result, may have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects. Mittal Steel competes primarily on the basis of quality and the ability to meet customers’ product specifications, delivery schedules and price expectation. Some of ArcelorMittal’s competitors may have different technologies, lower raw material and energy costs and lower employee post-employment benefit costs.
In addition, the competitive position of ArcelorMittal within the global steel industry may be affected by, among other things, the recent trend toward consolidation among Mittal Steel’s competitors, particularly in Europe and the United States; exchange rate fluctuations that may make the products of ArcelorMittal less competitive in relation to the products of steel companies based in other countries; and the development of new technologies for the production of steel and steel-related products.
ArcelorMittal could encounter supply shortages and increases in the cost of raw materials, energy and transportation.
Steel production requires substantial amounts of raw materials and energy, including iron ore, scrap, electricity, natural gas, coal and coke. Currently, there is a worldwide shortage of coke and coal, mainly as a result of the rapid growth in the demand for steel globally. In 2006, there was a sharp rise in the cost of a number of commodities essential for the process of steel-making. In particular, the prices of zinc and nickel rose substantially due to a worldwide stock shortage. Any prolonged interruption in the supply of raw materials or energy, or substantial increases in their costs, could adversely affect the business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects of steel companies. The availability and prices of raw materials may be negatively affected by, among other factors:
| • | new laws or regulations; |
| • | suppliers’ allocations to other purchasers; |
| • | interruptions in production by suppliers; |
| • | accidents or other similar events at suppliers’ premises or along the supply chain; |
| • | wars, natural disasters and other similar events; |
| • | changes in exchange rates; |
| • | consolidation in steel-related industries; |
| • | the bargaining power of raw material suppliers; |
49
Table of Contents
| • | worldwide price fluctuations; and |
| • | the availability and cost of transportation. |
In addition, energy costs, including the cost of electricity and natural gas, make up a substantial portion of the cost of goods sold by steel companies. The price of energy has varied significantly in the past several years and may vary significantly in the future largely as a result of market conditions and other factors beyond the control of steel companies, including significant increases in oil prices. Because the production of direct reduced iron and the re-heating of steel involve the use of significant amounts of natural gas, steel companies are sensitive to the price of natural gas.
Further global developments, particularly the dramatic increase in Chinese and Indian demand for materials and inputs used in steel manufacturing, may cause severe shortages and/or substantial price increases in key raw materials and ocean transportation capacity. Inability to recoup such cost increases from increases in the selling prices of steel companies’ products, or inability to cater to their customers’ demands because of non-availability of key raw materials or other inputs, may harm the business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects of steel companies.
ArcelorMittal will not necessarily be able to procure adequate supplies in the future. A portion of Mittal Steel’s raw materials are obtained under contracts that are either short-term or are subject to periodic price negotiations. Any prolonged interruption, discontinuation or other disruption in the supply of raw materials or energy, or substantial increases in their costs, may harm ArcelorMittal’s business, financial condition and results of operations or prospects.
ArcelorMittal will be susceptible to changes in governmental policies and international economic conditions that could limit its operating flexibility and reduce its profitability.
Governmental, political and economic developments relating to inflation, interest rates, taxation, currency fluctuations, trade regulations, social or political instability, diplomatic relations, international conflicts and other factors could limit ArcelorMittal’s operating flexibility and reduce its profitability. Mittal Steel has not obtained and ArcelorMittal does not intend to obtain political risk insurance in any country in which it will conduct business. Countries where ArcelorMittal will conduct operations where such risks are the greatest would include Algeria, Liberia, Kazakhstan and Ukraine. In particular, regulatory authorities in these countries exercise considerable discretion in the enforcement of local laws and regulations. At times, authorities may use this discretion to enforce laws and regulations in an unpredictable manner, and dealing with this may be costly and time consuming for ArcelorMittal. Additionally, there is uncertainty relating to possible changes in government or in the political climate. For example, a new government may seek to reopen or challenge the tax, legal or other arrangements affecting ArcelorMittal’s operations, which could have material adverse consequences.
Competition from other materials could significantly reduce market prices and demand for steel products and thereby reduce ArcelorMittal’s cash flow and profitability.
In many applications, steel competes with other materials that may be used as steel substitutes, such as aluminum (particularly in the automobile industry), cement, composites, glass, plastic and wood. Additional substitutes for steel products could significantly reduce market prices and demand for steel products and thereby reduce ArcelorMittal’s cash flow and profitability.
ArcelorMittal will be subject to stringent environmental and health and safety regulations that give rise to significant costs and liabilities, including those arising from environmental remediation programs.
ArcelorMittal will be subject to a broad range of environmental and health and safety laws and regulations in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. These laws and regulations, as interpreted by relevant agencies and the courts, impose increasingly stringent environmental and health and safety protection standards regarding, among other things, air emissions, wastewater storage, treatment and discharges, the use and handling of hazardous or toxic materials, waste disposal practices, worker health and safety and the remediation of environmental contamination. For example, U.S. laws and regulations and European Union, or EU, Directives, as well as any new or additional environmental compliance requirements that may arise out of the implementation by different countries of the Kyoto Protocol (United Nations Framework on Climate Change, 1992), may impose new and/or additional rules or more stringent environmental norms with which steel companies may have to comply. Compliance with these obligations may require additional capital expenditures or modifications in
50
Table of Contents
operating practices, particularly at steel companies operating in countries that have recently joined the European Union. The costs of complying with health and safety laws and regulations and environmental regulatory or remediation obligations, including participation in the assessment and remediation of contaminated sites, could be significant, and failure to comply could result in the assessment of civil and criminal penalties, the suspension of permits or operations, and lawsuits by third parties. In addition to the impact on current facilities and operations, these standards could give rise to substantial environmental liabilities with respect to divested assets and past activities.
Mittal Steel is involved in a range of compliance actions and legal proceedings concerning environmental matters, all of which relate to legacy obligations arising from acquisitions. In some cases, Mittal Steel has entered into consent decrees or settlement agreements requiring remediation of contamination or other capital improvements relating to environmental matters. Failure to comply with these commitments could result in significant monetary penalties. Mittal Steel is also conducting significant remedial activities at various facilities to address environmental liabilities in the absence of any governmental actions.
Mittal Steel has established reserves for environmental remediation activities and liabilities. However, environmental matters cannot be predicted with certainty, and the reserves may not be adequate, especially in light of the potential for change in environmental conditions or the discovery of previously unknown environmental conditions, the risk of governmental orders to carry out additional activities not initially included in the remediation estimates, and the potential for Mittal Steel to be liable for remediation of other sites for which provisions have not been previously established. Such future developments could result in significantly higher environmental costs and liabilities.
Mittal Steel, like other steel companies with operations in the EU, is subject to carbon dioxide, or CO2 legislation. In Europe, according to the framework of the European Emissions Trading system, every year plants receive a number of CO2 allowances to cover their emissions during that year. In addition, Canada and other countries in which Mittal Steel has facilities also may issue laws and regulations requiring reductions in greenhouse gas emissions or the purchase of emission credits.
The EU’s review of the national allocation plans for the 2008-2012 trading period is ongoing. If the allowances granted to Mittal Steel and its subsidiaries for the 2008-2012 trading period are insufficient to cover their CO2 emissions, Mittal Steel will have to purchase additional allowances on the open market or import allowances from third countries in which emission-saving projects carried out under the Kyoto Protocol’s flexible project-based mechanism can generate additional allowances.
51
Table of Contents
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This proxy statement/prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus contain forward-looking statements based on estimates and assumptions within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the business, future financial condition, results of operations and prospects of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal, including its acquired subsidiaries. These statements usually contain the words “believes”, “plans”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “estimates” or other similar expressions. For each of these statements, you should be aware that forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Although it is believed that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, there is no assurance that the actual results or developments anticipated will be realized or, even if realized, that they will have the expected effects on the business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects of Mittal Steel.
These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which the statements were made, and no obligation has been undertaken to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements made in this proxy statement/prospectus or elsewhere as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable laws and regulations. In addition to other factors and matters contained or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus, it is believed that the following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements:
| • | ArcelorMittal’s ability to manage its growth; |
| • | the timing of realization of cost savings and other synergies expected to result from acquisitions; |
| • | costs or difficulties related to the integration of acquisitions, including the acquisition of Arcelor by Mittal Steel, may be greater than expected; |
| • | uncertainty as to the actions of the Significant shareholder; |
| • | any loss or diminution in the services of Lakshmi N. Mittal, Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; |
| • | any downgrade of ArcelorMittal’s credit rating; |
| • | ArcelorMittal’s ability to operate within the limitations imposed by its financing arrangements; |
| • | ArcelorMittal’s ability to refinance existing debt and obtain new financing on acceptable terms to finance its growth; |
| • | mining risks; |
| • | ArcelorMittal’s ability to fund under-funded pension liabilities; |
| • | the increased cost of wages and the risk of labor disputes; |
| • | general economic conditions, whether globally, nationally or in the markets in which ArcelorMittal will conduct business; |
| • | the risk of disruption or volatility in the economic, political or social environment in the countries in which ArcelorMittal will conduct its business; |
| • | fluctuations in currency exchange rates, commodity prices, energy prices and interest rates; |
| • | the risk of disruptions to ArcelorMittal’s operations; |
| • | the risk of unfavorable changes to, or interpretations of, the tax laws and regulations in the countries in which ArcelorMittal will operate; |
| • | the risk that ArcelorMittal may not be able to fully utilize its deferred tax assets; |
| • | damage to ArcelorMittal’s production facilities due to natural disasters; |
| • | the risk that ArcelorMittal’s insurance policies may provide limited coverage; |
| • | the risk of product liability claims adversely affecting ArcelorMittal’s operations; |
| • | international trade actions or regulations; |
| • | expenditures and senior management time required in connection with ArcelorMittal’s compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; |
52
Table of Contents
| • | ArcelorMittal’s ability to operate successfully within a cyclical industry; |
| • | the risk that demand for and supply of steel products in China and other developed / developing economies may result in falling steel prices; |
| • | the risk of decreasing prices for ArcelorMittal’s products and other forms of competition in the steel industry; |
| • | the risk of significant supply shortages and increasing costs of raw materials, energy and transportation; |
| • | the need for large capital expenditures to maintain ArcelorMittal’s portfolio of assets; |
| • | increased competition from substitute materials, such as aluminum; and |
| • | legislative or regulatory changes, including those relating to protection of the environment and health and safety, and those resulting from international agreements and treaties related to trade, accession to the European Union (“EU”) or otherwise. |
These factors are discussed in more detail in this proxy statement/prospectus, including under the section “Risk Factors”.
53
Table of Contents
THE MITTAL STEEL EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING
Date, Time, Place, Purpose and Agenda of the Mittal Steel Extraordinary General Meeting
The extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of Mittal Steel will be held on August 28, 2007, at 2 p.m. Amsterdam time, at Hotel Okura Amsterdam located at Ferdinand Bolstraat 333, 1072 LH Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The purpose of the extraordinary general meeting is to consider and to vote on the proposal to merge Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal as contemplated by the merger proposal (voorstel tot fusie) and the explanatory memorandum (toelichting op het voorstel tot fusie), dated as of June 25, 2007.
The agenda for the extraordinary general meeting is as follows:
| 1. | Opening. |
| 2 | Proposal to merge Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal as contemplated by the merger proposal (voorstel tot fusie) and the explanatory memorandum (toelichting op het voorstel tot fusie) dated as of June 25, 2007, including the authority of the Board of Directors to complete the merger. |
| 3. | Questions / any other item with permission of the Chairman. |
| 4. | Closing. |
The Mittal Steel Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the decision to merge Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum. For the reasons for this recommendation, see “The Merger—Recommendation of the Mittal Steel Board of Directors and Its Reasons for the Merger”.
Who Can Vote at the Mittal Steel Extraordinary General Meeting
You can vote at the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting if you own Mittal Steel shares at the close of business on August 21, 2007, which is referred to as the registration date. Pursuant to Dutch law and the articles of association of Mittal Steel, the registration date cannot be earlier than 7 days prior to the extraordinary general meeting.
Holders of European Registry Shares. In order to exercise their voting rights at the extraordinary general meeting in person or by proxy, holders of Mittal Steel class A common shares whose ownership is directly or indirectly recorded in Mittal Steel’s Dutch or Luxembourg shareholder registry, which are referred to as European Registry Shares, must follow the instructions described under “—Manner of Voting—Holders of European Registry Shares whose ownership is directly recorded in Mittal Steel’s Dutch or Luxembourg shareholder registry” or “—Manner of Voting—Holders of European Registry Shares whose ownership is indirectly recorded in Mittal Steel’s Dutch or Luxembourg shareholder registry”, as applicable.
Holders of Class B Common Shares. In order to exercise their voting rights at the extraordinary general meeting in person or by proxy, holders of Mittal Steel class B common shares must follow instructions identical to those described under “—Manner of Voting—Holders of European Registry Shares whose ownership is recorded directly in Mittal Steel’s Dutch or Luxembourg shareholder registry”.
Holders of New York Registry Shares. In order to exercise their voting rights at the extraordinary general meeting in person or by proxy, holders of Mittal Steel class A common shares whose ownership is directly or indirectly recorded in Mittal Steel’s New York shareholder registry, which are referred to as New York Registry Shares, must follow the instructions described under “—Manner of Voting” below for holders of New York Registry Shares.
Vote Required for Adoption of Decision to Merge
In order to effect the merger, Mittal Steel shareholders must adopt the decision to merge Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum. The decision to merge requires:
| • | if less than 50% of the outstanding Mittal Steel shares are represented in person or by proxy at the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the Mittal Steel shares represented in person or by proxy at the extraordinary general meeting, or |
54
Table of Contents
| • | if at least 50% of the outstanding Mittal Steel shares are represented in person or by proxy at the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the Mittal Steel shares represented in person or by proxy at the extraordinary general meeting. |
Manner of Voting
If you are a Mittal Steel shareholder, you may submit your vote for or against the proposal submitted at the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting in person or by proxy. All Mittal Steel shares entitled to vote and represented by duly completed proxies received prior to the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting in accordance with the applicable formalities, and not revoked, will be voted at the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting as instructed on the proxies. Holders of Mittal Steel class A common shares and Mittal Steel class B common shares and their duly appointed proxies that wish to attend the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting in person, must register and bring their attendance card (in the case of holders of European Registry Shares whose ownership is indirectly recorded in Mittal Steel’s Dutch or Luxembourg shareholder registry or in the case of holders of New York Registry Shares) (see “—Attendance in Person”) as well as a form of personal identification to enter the meeting.
Holders of European Registry Shares Whose Ownership is Directly Recorded in Mittal Steel’s Dutch or Luxembourg Shareholder Registry
The following paragraphs apply only to those holders of European Registry Shares whose ownership is directly recorded in Mittal Steel’s Dutch or Luxembourg shareholder registry on August 21, 2007, the registration date. (These European Registry Shares cannot be traded on Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A, the regulated market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the Spanish exchanges, unless the holders of these shares are deregistered from the shareholder registry and these shares are entered into the relevant book-entry system.)
Attendance in Person. Holders of these European Registry Shares who elect to attend the extraordinary general meeting in person must register with Mittal Steel before 5 p.m. (Amsterdam time) on August 23, 2007. These holders of European Registry Shares must complete, sign and date a proxy form that can be obtained from Mittal Steel (c/o Arcelor ‹ Service Titres ›, 19, Avenue de la Liberté, L-2930 Luxembourg, phone +352 4792 1) or downloaded from Mittal Steel’s website (www.arcelormittal.com). The completed, signed and dated proxy form must be returned to Mittal Steel (c/o Arcelor ‹ Service Titres ›, 19, Avenue de la Liberté, L-2930 Luxembourg, or facsimile +352 4792 2189) such that the proxy form will be received by Mittal Steel before 5 p.m. (Amsterdam time) on August 23, 2007.
Attendance by Proxy. Holders of these European Registry Shares who are unable to attend the extraordinary general meeting in person, may give a voting instruction to the Secretary of Mittal Steel, Mr. Henk Scheffer (c/o Arcelor ‹ Service Titres ›, 19, Avenue de la Liberté, L-2930 Luxembourg), or to a third party that the holder designates. Prior to giving voting instructions to the Secretary of Mittal Steel, holders of European Registry Shares must (a) have registered their shares as described above (see “—Attendance in Person”), and (b) complete, sign and date the proxy form that can be obtained from Mittal Steel (c/o Arcelor ‹ Service Titres ›, 19, Avenue de la Liberté, L-2930 Luxembourg, phone + 352 4792 1) or downloaded from Mittal Steel’s website. The completed, signed and dated proxy form must be returned to Mittal Steel (c/o Arcelor ‹ Service Titres ›, 19, Avenue de la Liberté, L-2930 Luxembourg or facsimile + 352 4792 2189) such that the proxy form will be received by Mittal Steel before 5 p.m. (Amsterdam time) on August 23, 2007.
If a holder of these European Registry Shares wishes to be represented by a proxy other than the Secretary of Mittal Steel, then this holder must (a) have registered his or her shares as described above (see “—Attendance in Person”), and (b) have completed, signed, dated and returned a proxy, indicating the name of the proxy to Mittal Steel (c/o Arcelor <Service Titres>, 19 avenue de la Liberté, L-2930 Luxembourg, or facsimile +352 4792 2189) such that the proxy will be received by Mittal Steel in order to have that name recorded on the registration list for the extraordinary general meeting before 5 p.m. (Amsterdam time) on August 23, 2007.
Finally, holders of these European Registry Shares cannot revoke their proxy.
Holders of European Registry Shares Whose Ownership is Indirectly Recorded in Mittal Steel’s Dutch or Luxembourg Shareholder Registry
The following paragraphs apply only to those holders of European Registry Shares whose ownership is indirectly recorded in Mittal Steel’s Dutch or Luxembourg shareholder registry. (These European Registry
55
Table of Contents
Shares are held through a book-entry system and can be directly traded on Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the regulated market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange and the Spanish exchanges.)
Attendance in Person. Holders of these European Registry Shares who elect to attend the extraordinary general meeting in person must request their local bank or broker at which their shares are registered, to send a confirmation notice to the relevant central registration bank before August 21, 2007. (A list of the relevant central registration banks is included below. See “–Central Registration Banks”.) That confirmation notice must state that the relevant European Registry Shares are or will be registered with the local bank or broker’s records in the holder’s name on August 21, 2007. If the confirmation notice is duly completed, signed, dated and returned, the holder of the European Registry Shares will receive by e-mail or mail a proof of registration and/or a receipt of deposit/registration, which will serve as an attendance card for the extraordinary general meeting.
Attendance by Proxy. Holders of these European Registry Shares who are unable to attend the extraordinary general meeting in person, may give a voting instruction to the Secretary of Mittal Steel, Mr. Henk Scheffer (c/o Arcelor ‹ Service Titres ›, 19, Avenue de la Liberté, L-2930 Luxembourg, phone + 352 4792 1), or to a third party that the holder designates. Prior to giving voting instructions to the Secretary of Mittal Steel, holders of European Registry Shares must (a) have registered their shares as described above (see “—Attendance in Person”), and (b) complete, sign and date the proxy form that can be obtained from the relevant central registration bank or downloaded from Mittal Steel’s website. The completed, signed and dated proxy form must be returned to the relevant central registration bank before August 23, 2007.
If a holder of these European Registry Shares wishes to be represented by a proxy other than the Secretary of Mittal Steel, then this holder must (a) have registered his or her shares as described above (see “—Attendance in Person”), and (b) have provided the name of the proxy to Mittal Steel in order to have that name recorded on the registration list for the extraordinary general meeting before 5 p.m. (Amsterdam time) on August 23, 2007.
Finally, holders of these European Registry Shares cannot revoke their proxy.
Central Registration Banks. Mittal Steel has appointed the following central registration banks:
| • | For European Registry Shares that are included in the Euroclear Nederland system and that are admitted to trading on Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V.: |
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
| • | For European Registry Shares that are included in the Euroclear Belgium system and that are admitted to trading on Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV: |
Bank Degroof SA/NV.
| • | For European Registry Shares that are included in the Euroclear France system and that are admitted to trading on Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A.: |
Société Générale.
| • | For European Registry Shares that are included in the Clearstream Banking or Euroclear Bank system and that are admitted to trading on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s regulated market: |
HSBC Trinkaus & Burkhardt International SA.
| • | For European Registry Shares that are included in the Iberclear system and that are admitted to trading on the Spanish exchanges: |
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
Holders of New York Registry Shares
Holders of New York Registry Shares wishing to exercise their shareholder rights, either in person or by proxy, must complete, sign, date and return the U.S. proxy card (enclosed in this proxy statement/prospectus), such that the proxy card will be received before 5 p.m. (New York time) on August 23, 2007, at the office of The Bank of New York at 101 Barclay Street, New York, New York 10286, U.S.A. to the attention of the Proxy Department, A level.
Attendance in Person. Holders of New York Registry Shares who elect to attend the extraordinary general meeting in person and duly complete, date, sign and return the U.S. proxy card in time, will receive an attendance card.
56
Table of Contents
Attendance by Proxy. For those holders of New York Registry Shares who are unable to attend the extraordinary general meeting in person, the enclosed U.S. proxy card is a means by which such holders can exercise their voting rights. The U.S. proxy card appoints The Bank of New York as proxy holder, with full power of substitution. If the U.S. proxy card is duly completed, dated, signed and returned, all New York Registry Shares represented thereby will be voted, and, if a voting instruction is included by the holder of the New York Registry Shares in the U.S. proxy card, the New York Registry Shares will be voted by The Bank of New York or its substitute(s) in accordance with such voting instruction. If no voting instruction is included in the U.S. proxy card, the proxy will be voted by The Bank of New York or its substitute(s) “FOR” the decision to merge Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum.
Holders of New York Registry Shares who are unable to attend the extraordinary general meeting in person and who wish to appoint a proxy holder other than The Bank of New York, must notify Mittal Steel (c/o Arcelor, ‹ Service Titres ›, 19, Avenue de la Liberté, L-2930 Luxembourg, phone + 352 4792 1) on or prior to August 23, 2007 of their intention to be represented at the meeting by proxy. Holders of New York Registry Shares should discuss the exact formalities with their bank or broker where the New York Registry Shares are registered in a securities account.
Finally, holders of New York Registry Shares who have executed a U.S. proxy card but who wish to revoke such proxy may do so by (a) delivering a subsequently dated U.S. proxy card or by giving written notice of revocation, which in each case must be received by The Bank of New York (marked for the attention of the Proxy Department), 101 Barclay Street, A Level, New York, New York 10286 on or before 5 p.m. (New York time) on August 23, 2007, or (b) giving written notice of revocation to be received by The Bank of New York (marked for the attention of the Proxy Department), 101 Barclay Street, A Level, New York, New York 10286 before 5 p.m. (New York time) on August 23, 2007 and attending the extraordinary general meeting in person and voting in person by ballot.
57
Table of Contents
The following is a description of the material aspects of the merger. While Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal believe that the following description covers the material terms of the merger, the description may not contain all the information that is important to you. Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal encourage you to read carefully this entire proxy statement/prospectus, including the merger agreement and the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, copies of which are attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A and Annex B, respectively, for a more complete understanding of the merger.
Overview
Each of Mittal Steel’s and ArcelorMittal’s Board of Directors has unanimously approved and signed the merger agreement, the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum and has unanimously approved the transactions contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum. At the effective time of the merger, Mittal Steel will merge into ArcelorMittal by way of absorption by ArcelorMittal of Mittal Steel and without liquidation of Mittal Steel. The combined company will be named “ArcelorMittal”. Mittal Steel shareholders will receive the merger consideration upon the terms set forth in the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum and as further described under “The Merger Agreement, the Merger Proposal and the Explanatory Memorandum—Merger Consideration”.
Background of the Merger
On January 27, 2006 Mittal Steel publicly announced the launch of an unsolicited offer for all of the shares and convertible bonds of Arcelor, which is referred to as the Offer.
On January 29, 2006, Arcelor’s Board of Directors rejected the Offer as initially announced.
On June 25, 2006, following numerous communications between members of the management of Mittal Steel and Arcelor, and a revision of the initial Offer on May 19, 2006, Arcelor’s Board of Directors considered a subsequent revision of the Offer and decided unanimously to recommend Mittal Steel’s revised Offer in connection with the simultaneous execution of the Memorandum of Understanding.
In the Memorandum of Understanding, the parties agreed, among other things, to use their best efforts to procure that Mittal Steel would merge into Arcelor as soon as practicable following completion of the revised Offer, including any subsequent offer or compulsory buy-out proceedings required under Luxembourg law, and that the combined entity would be incorporated, domiciled and headquartered in Luxembourg. For a description of the Memorandum of Understanding, see “Material Contracts and Related Party Transactions—Memorandum of Understanding between Mittal Steel, Arcelor and the Significant Shareholder” and “Management—Mittal Steel / Arcelor Memorandum of Understanding”.
On July 26, 2006, Mittal Steel announced the final results of its offer for Arcelor securities, which expired on July 13, 2006 in Belgium, France, Luxembourg, Spain and the United States. As of such date, 594,549,753 Arcelor shares were tendered (including Arcelor shares underlying the Arcelor ADS tendered in the United States) and 19,858,533 Arcelor convertible bonds (OCEANEs 2017) were tendered, which represented, on a fully-diluted basis, 91.88% of Arcelor’s share capital and 91.97% of Arcelor’s voting rights. During the subsequent offering period, which ran from July 27, 2006 through August 17, 2006 in Belgium, France, Luxembourg, Spain and the United States, Arcelor security holders tendered an additional 12,721,565 Arcelor shares (including Arcelor shares underlying Arcelor ADSs tendered in the U.S.), and 57,651 Arcelor convertible bonds (OCEANEs 2017). The offer was then kept open until November 17, 2006 pursuant to Luxembourg law. On December 31, 2006, Mittal Steel held 607.3 million Arcelor shares and 19.9 million Arcelor convertible bonds representing 93.72% of Arcelor’s issued share capital and 93.80% of Arcelor’s voting rights.
On August 4, 2006, Mittal Steel and Arcelor announced new appointments to the management board and, subject to approval of the respective general meetings of shareholders, the Board of Directors for both Mittal Steel and Arcelor, allowing for the immediate start of the integration of Mittal Steel and Arcelor. Following the August 4, 2006 announcement, executives and senior management at both Mittal Steel and Arcelor, assisted by external advisers, commenced the preparation of the merger of Mittal Steel into Arcelor.
On April 27, 2007, the Board of Directors of Mittal Steel met to discuss the possibility of merging Mittal Steel into Arcelor in two steps in order to have Mittal Steel incorporated, domiciled and headquartered in Luxembourg, as required by the Memorandum of Understanding, as promptly as possible.
58
Table of Contents
On May 2, 2007, pursuant to written decisions as of such date, the Board of Directors of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal each unanimously approved the merger agreement between Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal and it was executed by the parties.
On May 15, 2007, the Board of Directors of Mittal Steel appointed AGN Daamen & van Sluis as independent auditor and the Board of Directors of ArcelorMittal appointed Mazars Luxembourg and Mazars Netherlands as independent auditors, each for purposes of the merger process.
On June 25, 2007, Mazars Paardekooper Hoffman N.V. issued its written auditors’ declaration (accountantsverklaring) and its written auditors’ report (accountantsverslag) to the Board of Directors of ArcelorMittal with respect to, among other things, the fairness of the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio, as required pursuant to Dutch law. On June 25, 2007, Mazars S.A. issued its written report (un rapport écrit destiné aux actionnaires) to the Board of Directors of ArcelorMittal, with respect to, among other things, the fairness of the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio, as required pursuant to Luxembourg law.
On June 25, 2007, AGN Daamen & van Sluis issued its written auditors’ declaration (accountantsverklaring) and its written auditors’ report (accountantsverslag) to the Board of Directors of Mittal Steel with respect to, among other things, the fairness of the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio, as required pursuant to Dutch law.
On June 25, 2007, all members of the Mittal Steel Board of Directors and the ArcelorMittal Board of Directors signed the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum.
The merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, each dated June 25, 2007, have been made publicly available on June 29, 2007.
Two-Step Merger Process and Second-Step Merger
In the MOU, Mittal Steel agreed that it would merge into Arcelor as soon as practicable following completion of its revised offer for Arcelor, and that the combined entity would be incorporated, domiciled and headquartered in Luxembourg. Following discussions at a meeting held on April 27, 2007, the Mittal Steel Board of Directors decided, pursuant to written decisions dated May 2, 2007, to organize a two-step process pursuant to which Mittal Steel would first be merged into ArcelorMittal, which would subsequently be merged into Arcelor as the ultimate surviving entity. The objective of the two-step process is to ensure the earliest possible compliance with the undertakings made by Mittal Steel in the context of its revised offer for Arcelor (as reflected in the MOU).
The merger that is the subject of this proxy statement/prospectus constitutes the first step of the combination of Mittal Steel and Arcelor into a single legal entity governed by Luxembourg law. In addition to enabling the parties to comply more rapidly and efficiently with part of the MOU undertakings, the first-step merger will permit a simplification of the group’s corporate structure as both ArcelorMittal and Arcelor will be located in the same jurisdiction (Luxembourg) with the same headquarters. The first-step merger, which will be completed before the second-step merger, will thereby contribute to a more efficient and rapid integration of the management and administrative teams of Mittal Steel and Arcelor, which are currently located in Rotterdam, Luxembourg and London.
The second-step merger will constitute the second and final step of the combination of Mittal Steel and Arcelor into a single legal entity governed by Luxembourg law. In the second-step merger, ArcelorMittal (the surviving entity in the Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal merger) will merge into Arcelor and shareholders of ArcelorMittal will become shareholders of Arcelor, which will subsequently be renamed “ArcelorMittal”. The second-step merger is governed solely by Luxembourg law, since it is a domestic merger between two Luxembourg law governed entities. The second-step merger is intended to further rationalize the corporate structure of the combined company initiated by the first-step merger of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal. It is intended to complete the second-step merger as soon as practicable after the completion of the first-step merger.
The second-step merger will be subject to shareholder approval at the level of Arcelor and ArcelorMittal, which corporate approvals will be sought following effectiveness of the first-step merger. Accordingly, shareholders of Mittal Steel who will remain shareholders of ArcelorMittal following the first-step merger will be entitled to vote on the second-step merger.
59
Table of Contents
As in the first-step merger, a merger proposal, an explanatory memorandum and other documentation required by Luxembourg corporate law and the U.S. federal and Luxembourg securities laws will be prepared and made publicly available for purposes of such corporate approvals. In particular, Arcelor intends to file a registration statement on Form F-4 with the SEC in connection with the second-step merger in advance or shortly following completion of the first-step merger. In addition, under applicable law, since Arcelor will be issuing shares to the shareholders of ArcelorMittal, which shares will be admitted to trading on stock exchanges in Belgium, France, Luxembourg, The Netherlands and Spain, a prospectus will be prepared in accordance with the Luxembourg law implementation of Directive 2003/71/EC, which prospectus will be subject to the approval of the CSSF and which will be “passported” into Belgium, France, The Netherlands and Spain.
A condition to the completion of the second-step merger is that the ultimate surviving entity, Arcelor (to be renamed “ArcelorMittal”) will be listed—as Mittal Steel is today and ArcelorMittal will be following effectiveness of the first-step merger—on the regulated market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the Spanish exchanges, and the NYSE.
Applicable Legal Framework
As of March 30, 2007, Luxembourg law expressly authorizes a merger between a Luxembourg société anonyme and a non-Luxembourg law governed company, provided that the law applicable to such non-Luxembourg law governed company does not prohibit such a merger.
Dutch law does not currently contain statutory provisions specifically permitting or enabling a cross-border legal merger between a Dutch naamloze vennootschap such as Mittal Steel and a Luxembourg société anonyme such as ArcelorMittal. This is expected to change following the implementation into Dutch law of Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of October 26, 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies. This directive must be implemented into Dutch law no later than December 15, 2007.
On December 13, 2005, the European Court of Justice held in Case C-411/03 (Sevic Systems AG) that Articles 43 and 48 (freedom of establishment) of the treaty establishing the European Community apply to member states’ laws concerning cross-border legal mergers. The European Court of Justice confirmed that if the laws of a member state of the EU allow for the merger between two companies incorporated in its jurisdiction (a national legal merger), it should also allow for a merger of a company incorporated in its jurisdiction with a company incorporated in another member state of the EU (a cross-border legal merger), unless a difference in the treatment of national and cross-border legal mergers (a) furthers a legitimate objective compatible with the treaty establishing the European Community, (b) is justified by imperative reasons of overriding public interest, and (c) is reasonable in light of the objective sought and does not go beyond what is necessary to attain it.
In Sevic Systems AG, the European Court of Justice also confirmed that a general prohibition of cross-border legal mergers between companies incorporated in different EU member states is in violation of the treaty establishing the European Community. Accordingly, cross-border legal mergers between companies incorporated in different EU member states can only be prohibited by such member states in individual cases where compelling reasons for such prohibition exist. The Boards of Directors of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal are unaware of a compelling reason that would prohibit a merger between Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal.
On the basis of Sevic Systems AG, the Boards of Directors of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal have agreed to merge Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal. The merger will be implemented in compliance with the applicable provisions of Dutch and Luxembourg law, and subject to the terms and conditions described in the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum.
Merger Proposal and Explanatory Memorandum
As required by Dutch and Luxembourg law, the Boards of Directors of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal have prepared, executed and filed with, respectively, the Trade Registry of the Chamber of Commerce for Rotterdam, The Netherlands and the Luxembourg Registry of Trade and Companies a merger proposal (voorstel tot fusie / projet de fusion) for the merger of Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal, together with the appropriate documents as required under Dutch and Luxembourg law.
In addition, as required by Dutch and Luxembourg law, the Boards of Directors of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal have prepared and signed, and made available at the offices of both companies, an explanatory memorandum (toelichting op het voorstel tot fusie / un rapport écrit détaillé) to the merger proposal, together with the appropriate documents as required under Dutch and Luxembourg law.
60
Table of Contents
As a matter of Dutch and Luxembourg law, the decision to merge ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel is effected solely through the adoption by the sole shareholder of ArcelorMittal and the shareholders of Mittal Steel of the decision to merge as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum. Therefore, you are encouraged to read carefully the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, in their entirety.
A copy of the merger proposal, including its exhibits, can be obtained at the Trade Registry of the Chamber of Commerce for Rotterdam, The Netherlands, the Luxembourg Registry of Trade and Companies, the offices of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal, and http://investors.arcelormittal.com. The merger proposal was filed with the Trade Registry of the Chamber of Commerce for Rotterdam, The Netherlands, and the Luxembourg Registry of Trade on or about June 29, 2007.
A copy of the explanatory memorandum can be obtained free of charge at the offices of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal, and at http://investors.arcelormittal.com.
Effectiveness of the Merger
The effectiveness of the merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver, where legally permissible, of the conditions precedent described under “—Conditions to Effectiveness of the Merger”.
The merger will become effective between Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal and vis-à-vis third parties upon the publication of the Luxembourg law-governed notarial deed recording the resolution of Mittal Steel, as the sole shareholder of ArcelorMittal approving the decision to merge in the Mémorial, Recueil des Sociétés et Associations, the official gazette of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg in accordance with Luxembourg law, which publication will take place on the first calendar day following the day of the execution of the Dutch law-governed notarial deed of merger (notariële akte van juridische fusie) between Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal.
For accounting purposes, the merger of Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal shall be considered a combination of entities under common control as of January 1, 2007. All recorded assets and liabilities of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal shall be carried forward at their historical book values, and the income of ArcelorMittal shall include the income of Mittal Steel as of January 1, 2007. For statutory reporting purposes in The Netherlands, the final accounting year of Mittal Steel shall end on December 31, 2006.
Analysis of the Exchange Ratio
The Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio have been determined by reference to the audited statutory and consolidated accounts (including the balance sheet, the profit and loss statements and the notes thereto, together with the report from the company’s auditors) of Mittal Steel for the accounting year ended December 31, 2006, and the audited statutory accounts (including the balance sheet, the profit and loss statements and the notes thereto, together with the report of the company’s statutory auditors) of ArcelorMittal for the accounting year ended December 31, 2006, provided, however, that the assets and liabilities of Mittal Steel shall be transferred to ArcelorMittal in their condition existing on the Effective Date.
The transferred assets and the assumed liabilities of Mittal Steel shall be assessed at their historical book values.
A one-to-one exchange ratio shall be applied to the Mittal Steel class A shares and the Mittal Steel class B shares. The two exchange ratios are identical since the Mittal Steel class A shares and the Mittal Steel class B shares carry identical economic and voting rights. The two exchange ratios are suitable (passend), since ArcelorMittal is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mittal Steel that has no activities or assets other than funds corresponding to its initial capital (reduced by expenses incurred since its incorporation).
The one-to-one exchange ratios are designed to facilitate the implementation of the Merger for the shareholders of Mittal Steel and to avoid the creation of fractional shares.
Since the one-to-one exchange ratios have been adopted as a matter of convention, which seems adequate in the context of a merger of a company into its wholly-owned subsidiary, and no Mittal Steel shareholder will be diluted in the merger, no other specific valuation methods have been used or applied, and, therefore, no specific difficulties have arisen in relation to the determination of such exchange ratios.
61
Table of Contents
Recommendation of Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors and Its Reasons for the Merger
Following discussions at a meeting held on April 27, 2007, the Mittal Steel Board of Directors unanimously decided pursuant to written decisions dated May 2, 2007 to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. On June 25, 2007, all members of the Mittal Steel Board of Directors signed the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum. The Mittal Steel Board of Directors unanimously recommends that the Mittal Steel shareholders vote FOR the decision to merge as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum.
In reaching its decision to effect the merger of Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal and to proceed with a two-step merger process, the Mittal Steel Board of Directors considered a variety of factors including, among others, the following:
| • | the MOU stated that Mittal Steel would merge into Arcelor as soon as practicable following completion of its revised offer for Arcelor, and that the combined entity would be incorporated, domiciled and headquartered in Luxembourg; |
| • | the first-step merger would be more expeditious than a direct merger of Mittal Steel into Arcelor; |
| • | the first-step merger would permit a simplification of the corporate structure as both ArcelorMittal and Arcelor would be located in the same jurisdiction (Luxembourg) with the same headquarters; |
| • | the first-step merger, which would be completed before the second-step merger, would thereby contribute to a more efficient and rapid integration of the management and administrative teams of Mittal Steel and Arcelor, which are currently located in Rotterdam, Luxembourg and London; |
| • | the combination of Mittal Steel and Arcelor structured as a two-step process rather than as a direct merger is not expected to entail any additional material accounting, tax or legal adverse consequences; |
| • | neither the first-step merger nor the second-step merger would significantly affect the corporate governance or operational organization of the combined entity; |
| • | the first-step merger will have no effect on total assets, liabilities, shareholders’ equity and net income of the combined entity; |
| • | subject to the receipt of appropriate tax rulings that constitute a condition precedent to the effectiveness of the merger, the first-step merger would neither cause any material adverse corporate tax consequences in The Netherlands or in Luxembourg for Mittal Steel or ArcelorMittal and Arcelor, nor trigger any Dutch withholding tax or Luxembourg capital duty; and |
| • | it was not anticipated that any of the regulatory requirements to which the first-step merger is subject would hinder, delay or restrict the effectiveness of such merger. |
In light of the number and wide variety of factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the transaction, the Mittal Steel Board of Directors did not consider it practicable to, and did not attempt to, quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors that it considered in reaching its determination. The Mittal Steel Board of Directors viewed its position as being based on all available information and the factors presented to and considered by it. In addition, individual directors may have given different weights to different factors. This explanation of Mittal Steel’s reasons for the merger and all other information presented in this section are forward-looking in nature and, therefore, should be read in light of the factors discussed under “Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements”.
The Mittal Steel Board of Directors realized that there can be no assurance about future results, including results expected or considered in the factors listed above. However, the Mittal Steel Board of Directors concluded that the potential benefits of effecting the merger with ArcelorMittal were significant and in particular that the merger would be a useful step towards the combination of Arcelor and Mittal Steel in a single legal entity governed by Luxembourg law and would enable Mittal Steel to comply as promptly as possible with part of the MOU undertakings.
In addition, the ArcelorMittal Board of Directors unanimously determined that the merger agreement, the merger proposal, the explanatory memorandum and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum are advisable and in the best interest of ArcelorMittal and the sole ArcelorMittal shareholder, approved the merger agreement, the merger proposal, the explanatory memorandum and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum. The merger agreement, merger proposal and explanatory memorandum were subsequently signed by the ArcelorMittal Board of Directors.
62
Table of Contents
Timetable for the Merger
The merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, each dated June 25, 2007, have been made publicly available on June 29, 2007. A copy of the merger proposal and a copy of the explanatory memorandum are attached to this prospectus as Annex B.
In order to complete the merger, Mittal Steel shareholders must adopt the decision to merge Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum. The extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of Mittal Steel that will vote on the proposal to merge Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal will be held on August 28, 2007, at 2 p.m., Amsterdam time, at Hotel Okura Amsterdam located at Ferdinand Bolstraat 333, 1072 LH Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
If the proposal to merge is adopted by the requisite majority at the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of Mittal Steel and all other conditions precedent are satisfied or waived, the merger is expected to be effected on or about September 3, 2007.
Upon effectiveness of the merger, holders of Mittal Steel shares will automatically receive newly issued ArcelorMittal shares in accordance with the applicable share exchange ratios and on the basis of their respective holdings as entered in the relevant Mittal Steel shareholder registry (register van aandeelhouders) or their respective securities accounts. Holders of Mittal Steel shares whose shares are registered directly in Mittal Steel’s Dutch or Luxembourg shareholder registry, will automatically receive newly issued ArcelorMittal shares through an entry in the relevant shareholder registry (registre des actionnaires) of ArcelorMittal. Holders of Mittal Steel shares whose shares are registered indirectly, that is through a book-entry system, in Mittal Steel’s Dutch or Luxembourg shareholder registry, will automatically receive newly issued ArcelorMittal shares through a credit to their respective securities accounts. Holders of Mittal Steel shares, whose shares are registered either directly or indirectly in Mittal Steel’s New York registry, will automatically be transferred to the ArcelorMittal New York shareholder registry.
Upon the day of effectiveness of the merger, which is expected to be on or about September 3, 2007, the ArcelorMittal shares will be listed and traded on the Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the regulated market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, the Spanish exchanges and the NYSE.
Finally, the Mittal Steel class A common shares, which (as the Mittal Steel class B common shares) will automatically disappear in the merger, will no longer be listed and traded on the Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the regulated market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, the Spanish exchanges, and the NYSE as of the day of effectiveness of the merger. The last day of listing and trading of the Mittal Steel class A common shares at these exchanges is expected to be on or about August 31, 2007.
Subject to shareholder approval and the timing of completion of the necessary regulatory review processes, ArcelorMittal currently expects to complete the second-step merger of the combined entity into Arcelor in October or November of 2007.
Opinion of Independent Dutch Auditors
On June 25, 2007, Mazars Paardekooper Hoffman N.V. (“Mazars Netherlands”) issued its written auditors’ declaration (accountantsverklaring) and its written auditors’ report (accountantsverslag) to the Board of Directors of ArcelorMittal with respect to, among other things, the fairness of the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio, as required pursuant to Dutch law. Mazars Netherlands opined, among other things, that, as of the date of its auditors’ declaration and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio are reasonable (redelijk). A copy of the auditors’ declaration is attached to the merger proposal, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B, and each of the merger proposal, the auditors’ declaration and the auditors’ report are separately available at the offices of ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel and both the merger proposal and the auditors’ declaration are separately available at the Chamber of Commerce for Rotterdam, The Netherlands and at the Luxembourg Registry of Trade and Companies.
Mazars Netherlands is certified as a Dutch auditor (registeraccountant) by the Koninklijke Nederlands Instituut van Registeraccountants (Royal NIVRA), which regulates the profession of registered accountants,
63
Table of Contents
pursuant to the Dutch Act on the Supervision of Auditing Firms (Wet Toezicht Accountantsorganisaties). Mazars Netherlands was selected among a number of auditor firms considered by the Board of Directors of ArcelorMittal, taking into account the auditor firms’ reputation, expertise and independence from both ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel. Neither Mazars Netherlands nor any of its affiliates has had any material relationship with ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel and their respective affiliates during the past two years, except that Mazars & Guérard in France, currently an affiliate of Mazars Netherlands, at the request of Arcelor, an affiliate of ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel, conducted a due diligence investigation with respect to the Severstal group in April 2006. Arcelor has been a subsidiary of Mittal Steel since August 1, 2006. Finally, Mazars Netherlands is affiliated with Mazars Luxembourg. Mazars Netherlands expects to receive an estimated aggregate compensation of €12,500 for its services in connection with the merger, none of which is contingent upon the consummation of the merger. For purposes of its auditors’ declaration, Mazars Netherlands was requested by the Board of Directors of ArcelorMittal to express its opinion on the fairness of the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio as set by the Boards of Directors of ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel and the amount of the shareholders’ equity (eigen vermogen) of Mittal Steel.
For purposes of its auditors’ declaration and its auditors’ report, Mazars Netherlands reviewed, at the request of the Board of Directors of ArcelorMittal, among other things, the merger proposal, the explanatory memorandum and the financial statements of ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel for accounting year 2006. In its review, Mazars Netherlands followed the applicable audit standards and procedures of the Royal NIVRA, which requires, among other things, to plan and perform the review to obtain reasonable assurance as to whether the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio are reasonable and whether the shareholders’ equity (eigen vermogen) of Mittal Steel at December 31, 2006, on the basis of valuation methods generally accepted in The Netherlands at least corresponds to the accounting par value of the aggregate number of shares to be received by the shareholders of Mittal Steel. No limitation was imposed by ArcelorMittal or Mittal Steel on the scope of Mazars Netherlands’ investigation. Based on the reviewed documents, the applicable procedures, the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio, Mazars Netherlands, in its report, reached the conclusion that the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio are reasonable (redelijk) and confirmed that the amount of the shareholders’ equity of Mittal Steel as of December 31, 2006, on the basis of valuation methods generally accepted in The Netherlands at least corresponds to the accounting par value of the aggregate number of shares in ArcelorMittal to be received by the shareholders of Mittal Steel in the merger. In addition, in the auditors’ report, Mazars Netherlands confirmed that the disclosure contained in the explanatory memorandum with respect to the methods used and applied to determine the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio meets the relevant statutory requirements.
On June 25, 2007, AGN Daamen & van Sluis issued its written auditors’ declaration (accountantsverklaring) and its written auditors’ report (accountantsverslag) to the Board of Directors of Mittal Steel with respect to, among other things, the fairness of the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio, as required pursuant to Dutch law. AGN Daamen & van Sluis opined, among other things, that, as of the date of its auditors’ declaration and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio are reasonable (redelijk). A copy of the auditors’ declaration is attached to the merger proposal, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B, and each of the merger proposal, the auditors’ declaration and the auditors’ report are separately available at the offices of ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel and both the merger proposal and the auditors’ declaration are separately available at the Chamber of Commerce for Rotterdam, The Netherlands and at the Luxembourg Registry of Trade and Companies.
AGN Daamen & van Sluis is certified as a Dutch auditor (registeraccountant) by the Koninklijke Nederlands Instituut van Registeraccountants (Royal NIVRA), which regulates the profession of registered accountants, pursuant to the Dutch Act on the Supervision of Auditing Firms (Wet Toezicht Accountantsorganisaties). AGN Daamen & van Sluis was selected among a number of auditor firms considered by the Board of Directors of Mittal Steel, taking into account the auditor firms’ reputation, expertise and independence from both ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel. Neither AGN Daamen & van Sluis nor any of its affiliates has had any material relationship with ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel and their respective affiliates during the past two years. AGN Daamen & van Sluis expects to receive an estimated aggregate compensation of €7,500 for its services in connection with the merger, none of which is contingent upon the consummation of the merger. For purposes of its auditors’ declaration, AGN Daamen & van Sluis was requested by the Board of Directors of Mittal Steel to express its opinion on the fairness of the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio as set by the Boards of Directors of ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel and the amount of the shareholders’ equity (eigen vermogen) of Mittal Steel.
64
Table of Contents
For purposes of its auditors’ declaration and its auditors’ report, AGN Daamen & van Sluis reviewed, at the request of the Board of Directors of Mittal Steel, among other things, the merger proposal, the explanatory memorandum and the financial statements of ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel for accounting year 2006. In its review, AGN Daamen & van Sluis followed the applicable audit standards and procedures of the Royal NIVRA, which requires, among other things, to plan and perform the review to obtain reasonable assurance as to whether the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio are reasonable and whether the shareholders’ equity (eigen vermogen) of Mittal Steel at December 31, 2006, on the basis of valuation methods generally accepted in The Netherlands at least corresponds to the accounting par value of the aggregate number of shares to be received by the shareholders of Mittal Steel. No limitation was imposed by ArcelorMittal or Mittal Steel on the scope of AGN Daamen & van Sluis’ investigation. Based on the reviewed documents, the applicable procedures, the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio, AGN Daamen & van Sluis, in its report, reached the conclusion that the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio are reasonable (redelijk) and confirmed that the amount of the shareholders’ equity of Mittal Steel as of December 31, 2006, on the basis of valuation methods generally accepted in The Netherlands at least corresponds to the accounting par value of the aggregate number of shares in ArcelorMittal to be received by the shareholders of Mittal Steel in the merger. In addition, in the auditors’ report, AGN Daamen & van Sluis confirmed that the disclosure contained in the explanatory memorandum with respect to the methods used and applied to determine the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio meets the relevant statutory requirements.
Opinion of Independent Luxembourg Auditor
On June 25, 2007, Mazars S.A. (“Mazars Luxembourg”) issued its written report (un rapport écrit destiné aux actionnaires) to the Board of Directors of ArcelorMittal, with respect to, among other things, the fairness of the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio, as required pursuant to Luxembourg law. Mazars Luxembourg opined, among other things, that, as of the date of its report and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, no fact has come to its attention that causes it to believe that the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio are not relevant and reasonable (pertinent et raisonnable). A copy of the report is attached to the merger proposal, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B, and both the merger proposal and the report are separately available at the offices of ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel and both the merger proposal and the report are separately available at the Chamber of Commerce for Rotterdam, The Netherlands and at the Luxembourg Registry of Trade and Companies.
Mazars Luxembourg is certified as a Luxembourg auditor (Réviseur d’Entreprises) by the Luxembourg Department of Justice (agréé par le Ministre de la Justice), according to Article 3 of the law dated June 28, 1984, which regulates the profession of Réviseur d’Entreprises. Mazars Luxembourg was selected among a number of auditor firms considered by the Board of Directors of ArcelorMittal, taking into account the auditor firms’ reputation, expertise and independence from both ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel. Neither Mazars Luxembourg nor any of its affiliates has had any material relationship with ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel and their respective affiliates during the past two years, except that Mazars & Guérard in France, an affiliate of Mazars Luxembourg, at the request of Arcelor, currently an affiliate of ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel, conducted a due diligence investigation with respect to the Severstal group in April 2006. Arcelor is a subsidiary of Mittal Steel since August 1, 2006. In addition, Mazars Luxembourg has been requested by ArcelorMittal to issue a report (un rapport écrit destiné aux actionnaires) in the second-step of the two-step merger process with respect to the exchange ratio to be applied in the second-step merger. Mazars Luxembourg expects to receive an estimated aggregate compensation of €700,000 for its services in connection with the merger and its services in connection with the second-step merger, none of which is contingent upon the consummation of either merger. For purposes of its report, Mazars Luxembourg was requested by the Board of Directors of ArcelorMittal to express its opinion on the fairness of the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio as set by the Boards of Directors of ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel.
For purposes of its report, Mazars Luxembourg reviewed, at the request of the Board of Directors of ArcelorMittal, among other things, the merger proposal, the explanatory memorandum and the financial statements of ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel for accounting year 2006. In its review, Mazars Luxembourg followed the applicable procedures of the Luxembourg Institut des Réviseurs d’Entreprises, which requires, among other things, to plan and perform the review to obtain moderate assurance (une assurance modéréé) as to whether the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio are reasonable. No limitation was imposed by ArcelorMittal or Mittal Steel on the scope of Mazars Luxembourg’s investigation. Based on the reviewed documents, the applicable procedures, the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio, Mazars Luxembourg, in its report, reached the conclusion that no fact has come to its attention that causes it to believe that the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio are not relevant and reasonable (pertinent et raisonnable).
65
Table of Contents
Structure of the Merger
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, at the effective time of the merger, Mittal Steel will merge into ArcelorMittal, by way of absorption by ArcelorMittal of Mittal Steel and without liquidation of Mittal Steel. The combined company will be named “ArcelorMittal”.
Taxation
For a description of certain material tax consequences of the merger for Mittal Steel shareholders, see “Taxation”.
Accounting Treatment
For accounting purposes, the merger of Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal shall be considered a combination of entities under common control as of January 1, 2007. All recorded assets and liabilities of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal shall be carried forward at their historical book values, and the income of ArcelorMittal shall include the income of Mittal Steel as of January 1, 2007.
For statutory reporting purposes in The Netherlands, the final accounting year of Mittal Steel shall end on December 31, 2006.
Listing and Admission to Trading of ArcelorMittal Shares
Under the merger agreement, ArcelorMittal is required to have the admission to trading of ArcelorMittal shares approved by the Luxembourg authorities, and to have the application for listing of these shares on Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the regulated market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, the Spanish exchanges and the NYSE (subject to official notice of issuance) approved by these respective exchanges.
Delisting and Deregistration of Mittal Steel Class A Common Shares
Upon effectiveness of the merger, the Mittal Steel class A common shares will no longer be listed on the NYSE and will be deregistered under the Exchange Act, and Mittal Steel class A common shares will no longer be admitted to trading and will be delisted from Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the Spanish exchanges and will no longer be admitted to trading on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s regulated market and no longer be listed on the Official List of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange.
Dissenters’ Rights of Appraisal
Mittal Steel shareholders will not have any appraisal or dissenters’ rights under Dutch law or under Mittal Steel’s articles of association in connection with the merger, and neither Mittal Steel nor ArcelorMittal will independently provide Mittal Steel shareholders with any such rights.
Restrictions on Sales of ArcelorMittal Shares Received in the Merger
Certain of the ArcelorMittal shares to be issued in the merger will be registered under the Securities Act and will be freely transferable, except for ArcelorMittal shares issued to any person who is deemed to be an “affiliate” of Mittal Steel under the Securities Act at the time of the Mittal Steel extraordinary general meeting. Persons who may be deemed to be “affiliates” of Mittal Steel prior to the merger include individuals or entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common control with, Mittal Steel prior to the merger, and may include officers and directors, as well as significant shareowners of Mittal Steel prior to the merger. Affiliates of Mittal Steel prior to the merger may not sell any of the ArcelorMittal shares received by them in connection with the merger, except pursuant to:
| • | an effective registration statement under the Securities Act covering the resale of those shares; |
| • | an exemption under paragraph (d) of Rule 145 under the Securities Act; or |
| • | any other applicable exemption under the Securities Act. |
ArcelorMittal’s F-4 Registration Statement, of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, does not cover the resale of ArcelorMittal shares, to be received in connection with the merger by persons who may be deemed to be affiliates of Mittal Steel prior to the merger.
66
Table of Contents
Material Agreements Between Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal Related to the Merger
ArcelorMittal was incorporated on August 13, 2004 under the name Verger Investments S.A. It has been a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mittal Steel since April 24, 2007 and was renamed ArcelorMittal on April 26, 2007. Except in connection with the merger and related transactions, ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel have not entered into any material agreements.
Regulatory Matters
Securities Law Approvals and Requirements
In connection with the merger and as a condition precedent to the effectiveness of the merger, ArcelorMittal has filed with the CSSF, the Luxembourg securities regulator, a draft shareholder circular/prospectus prepared in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2003/71/EC (the “European Prospectus”) for purposes of the offering of the ArcelorMittal shares to be issued as a result of the effectiveness of the merger to the public in the relevant member states of the European Union and the admission to trading of such shares on the relevant regulated markets in the European Union. The European Prospectus was approved by the CSSF on June 29, 2007 and a copy of such approval will be notified by the CSSF to the competent securities regulator in Belgium, France, The Netherlands and Spain.
ArcelorMittal will also file a request, subject to issuance of the shares to be issued in the merger, for admission of the ArcelorMittal shares to trading on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s regulated market and for the listing of these shares on the Official List of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, and for the admission to trading and listing of the ArcelorMittal shares on the on Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the Spanish exchanges and the NYSE. The admission to trading of ArcelorMittal shares issued in the merger and approval of the application for listing of the ArcelorMittal shares on these exchanges is a condition to the effectiveness of the merger.
Pursuant to the Luxembourg law of May 19, 2006 implementing Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of April 21, 2004 on takeover bids, referred to as the Luxembourg takeover law, if a natural or legal person, acting alone or in concert, acquires securities in ArcelorMittal which, when added to any existing holdings of those securities give him or her voting rights representing 33 1/3% of all of the voting rights attached to the issued shares in ArcelorMittal, such person is obliged to make an offer for the remaining shares in ArcelorMittal. The CSSF has confirmed that neither following the merger of Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal nor following the subsequent merger of ArcelorMittal into Arcelor will the Significant shareholder be obliged to launch a mandatory offer for the remaining shares of the combined entity.
Tax Rulings
Mittal Steel has applied for several tax rulings in connection with the merger, most significantly for a ruling from the Dutch tax authorities to confirm that the merger (i) shall not attract any major adverse Dutch corporate income tax consequences under the Dutch Corporate Income Tax Act (Wet op de vennootschapsbelasting 1969) and (ii) shall not constitute a taxable event under the Dutch Dividend Withholding Tax Act (Wet op de dividendbelasting 1965).
Other Requirements
The merger may be subject certain other regulatory requirements of other municipal, state, federal and foreign governmental agencies and authorities, including filings with competition authorities in certain jurisdictions. Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal are continuing to evaluate and comply in all material respects with these requirements, as appropriate. Although Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal cannot rule out the possibility that one or more of the regulatory approvals required to complete the merger will not be obtained on a timely basis or at all or that any of the governmental entities with which filings are or have been made may seek new or additional regulatory concessions as conditions for granting approval of the merger, Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal currently do not anticipate that any of such regulatory requirements will hinder, delay or restrict the effectiveness of the merger.
Under the merger agreement, Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal have each agreed to use their best efforts to consummate the merger, including to obtain all consents, approvals, authorizations, qualifications and orders of all third parties that are necessary for the consummation of the merger. See “The Merger Agreement, the Merger Proposal and the Explanatory Memorandum—Covenants and Agreements”.
67
Table of Contents
THE MERGER AGREEMENT, THE MERGER PROPOSAL AND THE EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
The following summary describes selected material provisions of the merger agreement, the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, copies of which are attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A and Annex B, respectively, and are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete texts of the merger agreement, merger proposal and explanatory memorandum and may not contain all the information about the merger agreement, the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum that is important to you.
As a matter of Dutch and Luxembourg law, the decision to merge ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel is effected solely through the adoption by the sole shareholder of ArcelorMittal and the shareholders of Mittal Steel of the decision to merge as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum. Therefore, you are encouraged to read carefully the merger agreement, the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, in their entirety.
The representations and warranties described below and included in the merger agreement were made by each of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal to the other. These representations and warranties were made as of specific dates. In addition, these representations and warranties may have been included in the merger agreement in order to allocate risk between Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal rather than to establish matters as facts. If material facts exist that contradict the representations or warranties in the merger agreement, these will be disclosed elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus and as such, you should read the information provided elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus and in the documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus for information regarding Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal and their respective businesses. See “Where You Can Find More Information”.
Structure of the Merger
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, at the effective time of the merger, Mittal Steel will merge into ArcelorMittal, by way of absorption by ArcelorMittal of Mittal Steel and without liquidation of Mittal Steel.
The merger constitutes the first step of the combination of Mittal Steel and Arcelor into a single legal entity governed by Luxembourg law. In a second and final step, ArcelorMittal (the surviving entity in the Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal merger) will merge into Arcelor and shareholders of ArcelorMittal will become shareholders of Arcelor, which will subsequently be renamed “ArcelorMittal”. See “The Merger—Two-Step Merger Process and Second-Step Merger” for further information with respect to the two-step merger process and the second-step merger.
Merger Consideration
Issuance of ArcelorMittal Shares. In the merger, a holder of Mittal Steel class A common shares will receive one newly issued ArcelorMittal share for every one Mittal Steel class A common share, which is referred to as the Class A Exchange Ratio.
A holder of Mittal Steel class B common shares will receive one newly issued ArcelorMittal share for every one Mittal Steel class B common share, which is referred to as the Class B Exchange Ratio.
Cancellation of Mittal Steel Shares Held by Mittal Steel. Mittal Steel class A common shares and Mittal Steel class B common shares held in treasury by or for the account of Mittal Steel or ArcelorMittal will disappear (vervallen) in the merger pursuant to Dutch law. ArcelorMittal will not issue any shares in consideration of such Mittal Steel shares held in treasury by or for the account of Mittal Steel or ArcelorMittal.
Cancellation of ArcelorMittal Shares Held by Mittal Steel. Each ArcelorMittal share held by Mittal Steel and transferred to ArcelorMittal pursuant to the merger will be cancelled upon the effective time of the merger pursuant to a resolution of the sole ArcelorMittal shareholder taken at the same time that the sole shareholder shall adopt, among other items, the decision to merge.
Delivery of the ArcelorMittal Shares. Upon effectiveness of the merger, holders of Mittal Steel shares will automatically receive newly issued ArcelorMittal shares in accordance with the applicable share exchange ratios
68
Table of Contents
and on the basis of their respective holdings as entered in the relevant Mittal Steel shareholder registry (register van aandeelhouders) or their respective securities accounts. Holders of Mittal Steel shares whose shares are registered directly in Mittal Steel’s Dutch or Luxembourg shareholder registry, will automatically receive newly issued ArcelorMittal shares through an entry in the relevant shareholder registry (registre des actionnaires) of ArcelorMittal. Holders of Mittal Steel shares whose shares are registered indirectly, that is through a book-entry system, in Mittal Steel’s Dutch or Luxembourg shareholder registry, will automatically receive newly issued ArcelorMittal shares through a credit to their respective securities accounts. Holders of Mittal Steel shares, whose shares are registered either directly or indirectly in Mittal Steel's New York registry, will automatically be transferred to the ArcelorMittal New York shareholder registry.
Stock Options. The merger proposal provides that each option to purchase Mittal Steel shares granted under employee and director stock plans of Mittal Steel will be converted into a right to acquire (or at ArcelorMittal’s option, subscribe) the same number of ArcelorMittal shares, on the same terms and conditions as were applicable to such options prior to the effective time of the merger (subject to any changes necessary to reflect the effectiveness of the merger).
Corporate Governance Matters
See “Management” for a description of the corporate governance and certain related matters of ArcelorMittal.
Representations and Warranties
The merger agreement contains representations and warranties by Mittal Steel relating to the following matters, subject to the exceptions described in the merger agreement:
| • | the organization, valid existence, good standing and qualification to do business of Mittal Steel; |
| • | Mittal Steel’s capital structure; |
| • | Mittal Steel’s corporate authorization and the validity of the merger agreement; and |
| • | the absence of any governmental registration, filing, notification or approval necessary for the execution of the merger agreement. |
The merger agreement contains representations and warranties by ArcelorMittal relating to the following matters, subject to the exceptions described in the merger agreement:
| • | the organization, valid existence, good standing and qualification to do business of ArcelorMittal; |
| • | ArcelorMittal’s capital structure; |
| • | ArcelorMittal’s corporate authorization and the validity of the merger agreement; and |
| • | the absence of any governmental registration, filing, notification or approval necessary for the execution of the merger agreement. |
Some of Mittal Steel’s and ArcelorMittal’s representations and warranties are qualified as to materiality or “material adverse effect”. When used with respect to a party, “material adverse effect” means any exceptional event or circumstance relating to that party, or any action taken by that party (in either case other than as a result of the terms of the merger agreement or the actions of the other party) that, in either case, materially alters the substance of the relevant party or substantially affects the economics of the merger.
The representations and warranties made by Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal are qualified in respect of information publicly disclosed.
Covenants and Agreements
Conduct of Mittal Steel. Mittal Steel has agreed that until the earlier of the effective date of the merger or the termination of the merger agreement, except as expressly described in the merger agreement, (a) Mittal Steel will conduct its business, and will cause its subsidiaries to conduct their businesses, only in, and Mittal Steel will not take, and will cause its subsidiaries not to take, any action except in, the ordinary course of business and in a manner consistent with past practice, and (b) Mittal Steel will use its best efforts to preserve substantially intact its current business organization and the business organization of its subsidiaries.
69
Table of Contents
Conduct of ArcelorMittal. ArcelorMittal has agreed that until the earlier of the effective time of the merger or the termination of the merger agreement, except as expressly described in the merger agreement, (a) ArcelorMittal will conduct its business only in, and ArcelorMittal will not take any action except in, the ordinary course of business and in a manner consistent with past practice, and (b) ArcelorMittal will use its best efforts to preserve substantially intact its current business organization.
Proxy Statement and Registration Statements. Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal have agreed to cooperate in connection with the preparation of the Mittal Steel proxy statement contained in this proxy statement/prospectus, the merger proposal, the explanatory memorandum and the European prospectus to be delivered to or put at the disposal of Mittal Steel shareholders in connection with the Mittal Steel shareholders’ meeting and other necessary corporate documents related to that meeting and the registration statement (of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part) to register the ArcelorMittal shares. Each party has further agreed to notify promptly the other party of the receipt of any comments from any governmental body, court or authority with respect to any of these documents and to allow the other party with a reasonable opportunity to review and comment on any amendment to these documents prior to the filing of the amendment with any governmental body or authority. Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal have further agreed that no amendment or supplement to any of these documents will be filed without the approval of both Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
Auditors’ Merger Reports. ArcelorMittal has agreed to ensure that independent auditors are appointed to review, certify and report on the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, and, in particular, the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio, as required pursuant to Dutch law and Luxembourg law.
Mittal Steel has agreed to ensure that independent auditors are appointed to review, certify and report on the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, and, in particular, the Class A Exchange Ratio and the Class B Exchange Ratio, as required pursuant to Dutch law and Luxembourg law.
Merger Proposal and Explanatory Memorandum. Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal have agreed that, as soon as possible following the availability of the auditors’ merger reports, the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum, together with the appropriate documents pursuant to Dutch law and Luxembourg law, will be published in accordance with the applicable provisions of Dutch law and Luxembourg law.
Access to Information. Until the effective time of the merger, Mittal Steel will, and will cause its subsidiaries to, provide to ArcelorMittal and ArcelorMittal’s representatives reasonable access at reasonable times upon prior notice to the officers, employees, agents, properties, offices and other facilities of Mittal Steel and its subsidiaries and to the books and records thereof in order to conduct whatever investigations ArcelorMittal deems necessary. Until the effective time of the merger, ArcelorMittal will provide to Mittal Steel and Mittal Steel’s representatives reasonable access at reasonable times upon prior notice to the officers, employees, agents, properties, offices and other facilities of ArcelorMittal and to the books and records thereof in order to conduct whatever investigations Mittal Steel deems necessary. All information obtained by either of the parties and their respective representatives pursuant to any such investigations will be kept confidential in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement. No investigation will affect any representation or warranty in the merger agreement or any condition to the obligations of the parties under the merger agreement.
Tax Treatment. Mittal Steel shall apply for a ruling from the Dutch tax authorities to confirm that the merger of Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal shall not attract any major adverse Dutch corporate income tax consequences under the Dutch Corporate Income Tax Act (Wet op de vennootschapsbelasting 1969). In addition, Mittal Steel shall apply for a ruling from the Dutch tax authorities to confirm that the merger of Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal shall not constitute a taxable event under the Dutch Dividend Withholding Tax Act (Wet op de dividendbelasting 1965).
Public Announcements. Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal have agreed to use their best efforts to develop a joint communications plan, and each will use its best efforts to ensure that all press releases and other public statements with respect to the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement will be consistent with that plan. Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal have agreed to consult with each other before issuing any press release or other public statement with respect to the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and will not issue any such press release or public statement prior to that consultation, unless otherwise required by applicable law or by obligations pursuant to any listing agreement with, or rules of, any securities exchange. In addition, except to the extent disclosed in or consistent with the
70
Table of Contents
European prospectus and the F-4 Registration Statement, neither Mittal Steel nor ArcelorMittal will issue any press release or otherwise make any public statement or disclosure concerning the other party or the other party’s business, financial condition or results of operations without the consent of the other party, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.
Notice. Each of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal has agreed to give prompt notice to the other party of (a) the occurrence or non-occurrence of any event the occurrence or non-occurrence of which could reasonably be expected to cause any of its representations or warranties contained in the merger agreement to be untrue or inaccurate in any material respect and (b) any failure by it to comply with or satisfy any covenant or agreement to be complied with or satisfied by it in the merger agreement; provided, however, that the delivery of any such notice will not limit or otherwise affect the remedies available hereunder to the party receiving such notice.
Best Efforts. Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal have agreed to use their best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all appropriate action, and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or advisable under applicable laws or otherwise to consummate and make effective the merger, including using their best efforts to obtain all consents, approvals, authorizations, qualifications and orders of all third parties necessary for the consummation of the merger and to fulfill the conditions precedent to the effectiveness of the merger. If at any time after the effective time of the merger any further action is necessary or desirable to carry out the purposes of the merger agreement, the proper officers and directors of each of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal will use their best efforts to take all such action. In addition, Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal have agreed to use all reasonable efforts to cause the merger to be consummated not later than December 31, 2007.
Admission to Trading and Listing of ArcelorMittal Shares. ArcelorMittal has agreed to use its best efforts (a) to have the admission to trading of ArcelorMittal shares approved by the Luxembourg authorities, and (b) to have the application for listing of these shares on the regulated market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the Spanish exchanges and the NYSE approved by these respective exchanges.
Delisting and Deregistration of Mittal Steel Class A Common Shares. Upon effectiveness of the merger, the Mittal Steel class A common shares will no longer be listed on the NYSE and will be deregistered under the Exchange Act, and Mittal Steel class A common shares will no longer be admitted to trading and will be delisted from Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the Spanish exchanges and will no longer be admitted to trading on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s regulated market and no longer be listed on the Official List of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange.
Expenses. Each of ArcelorMittal and Mittal Steel will bear its own expenses in connection with the merger.
Conditions to Effectiveness of the Merger
The obligations of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal to complete the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver, where legally permissible, of the following conditions:
| • | the decision to merge as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum will have been adopted by the requisite affirmative vote of the shareholders of Mittal Steel; |
| • | the following will have been approved by the vote of the sole shareholder of ArcelorMittal: |
| • | the decision to merge as contemplated by the merger proposal and the explanatory memorandum; |
| • | the decision to issue the ArcelorMittal shares in the merger; |
| • | the decision to cancel the ArcelorMittal shares that will be transferred by Mittal Steel to ArcelorMittal upon effectiveness of the merger; |
| • | the decision to issue ArcelorMittal stock options in the merger; |
| • | the decision to authorize the Board of Directors of ArcelorMittal to issue ArcelorMittal shares within the limits of the authorized share capital for delivery upon exercise or conversion, as applicable, of ArcelorMittal stock options and other equity-based awards granted under any ArcelorMittal employee incentive or benefit plan; |
| • | the European prospectus will have been approved by the Luxembourg Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier, or the CSSF, and a copy of that approval will have been notified by the CSSF to the competent securities regulator in Belgium, France, The Netherlands and Spain and any other relevant competent securities regulator in the European Union; |
71
Table of Contents
| • | the F-4 Registration Statement will have been declared effective by the SEC under the Securities Act and no stop order suspending the effectiveness of the F-4 Registration Statement will be in effect and no proceedings for such purpose will be pending before, or threatened by, the SEC; |
| • | the ArcelorMittal shares will have been (provisionally) admitted to trading and listing on the regulated market of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange, Eurolist by Euronext Amsterdam N.V., Eurolist by Euronext Brussels SA/NV, Eurolist by Euronext Paris S.A., the Spanish exchanges and the NYSE (subject to official notice of issuance); |
| • | the creditors’ waiting period pursuant to Dutch law will have expired, and any opposition formed by any creditors of ArcelorMittal or Mittal Steel will have been resolved; |
| • | the receipt of a satisfactory tax ruling from the Dutch tax authorities regarding the Dutch corporate income tax and Dutch dividend withholding tax consequences of the merger for Mittal Steel; |
| • | there will be no action, litigation or proceeding by any court or person, instituted or pending, or statute, rule, regulation, injunction, order or decree by any court or person issued or deemed to be applicable to the merger, that seeks to prohibit or restrain the merger or seeks a divestiture of any Mittal Steel shares or ArcelorMittal shares (including any shares issued in the merger) or limitation on the ownership rights of ArcelorMittal over the assets and liabilities of Mittal Steel that are transferred to ArcelorMittal upon effectiveness of the merger that would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect, as such concept is defined in the merger agreement; and |
| • | the articles of association of ArcelorMittal shall be amended to the effect that each of the issued shares in the capital of ArcelorMittal shall have a par value of €0.01 (one euro cent) each. |
Termination
The merger agreement may be terminated and the merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the effective time of the merger by the mutual written consent of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal. If any of the conditions precedent to the effectiveness of the merger have not been satisfied or waived, where legally permissible, by December 31, 2007, either party may terminate the merger agreement upon written notice to the other party; provided that the right to terminate the merger agreement will not be available to the party whose failure to fulfill any condition precedent under the merger agreement has been the cause of, or resulted in, the failure of the satisfaction of that condition precedent to occur on or before December 31, 2007. If no such written notice is sent, the merger agreement will remain in full force and the parties may agree to either consider such condition precedent waived or amend the merger agreement.
Effect of Termination
If the merger agreement is terminated and the merger is abandoned as described in “—Termination” above, there shall be no liability on the part of any party to the merger agreement, other than (a) as set forth in Section 13.2(a) of the merger agreement and (b) any liability resulting from any breach of a party’s representations, warranties, covenants or agreements contained in the merger agreement prior to its termination. In addition, certain of Mittal Steel’s and ArcelorMittal’s obligations under the merger agreement will survive the termination of the merger agreement.
No Rescission
Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal have waived to the greatest extent legally possible their respective rights to rescind (résoudre) or demand in legal proceedings the rescission (résolution) of the merger agreement pursuant to Luxembourg law.
Amendment and Waiver
The merger agreement may not be amended except by a written instrument duly executed by each of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal. At any time prior to the effective time of the merger, either Mittal Steel or ArcelorMittal may (a) extend the time for the performance of any obligation or other act of the other party, (b) waive any inaccuracy in the representations and warranties of the other party contained in the merger agreement or in any document delivered pursuant to the merger agreement and (c) waive compliance with any agreement of the other party or any condition to its own obligations contained in the merger agreement. Any such extension or waiver will be valid only if set forth in an instrument in writing signed by the party to be bound thereby.
72
Table of Contents
MATERIAL CONTRACTS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Mittal Steel engages in certain commercial and financial transactions with related parties, all of which are affiliates and joint ventures of Mittal Steel.
Except as disclosed in this section, Mittal Steel is not aware of any conflict of interest between the private interests or other duties of the members of Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors and their duties and responsibilities to Mittal Steel.
Shareholder’s Agreement
The Significant shareholder and Mittal Steel have entered into a shareholder and registration rights agreement (the “Shareholder’s Agreement”). Pursuant to the Shareholder’s Agreement, no person holding record or beneficial ownership of class B common shares may transfer (as defined in the Shareholder's Agreement) such class B common shares, except to a permitted transferee (“Permitted Transferee”). A Permitted Transferee means: (i) Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal; (ii) his parents, spouse, children (natural or adopted), grandchildren or other issues; (iii) trusts the primary beneficiaries of which are any of the foregoing persons or any charitable organization designated by any of them, which trusts are controlled, directly or indirectly, by any of the persons under clause (i), (ii) or (v); (iv) corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies and other persons if at least 80% of the economic interest in any such person is owned by any of the persons under clause (i) and (ii) or any charitable organization designated by any of them; and (v) in the case of any person in clause (i) and (ii), the heirs, executors, administrators or personal representatives upon the death of such person or upon the incompetence or disability of such person for the purposes of the protection and management of such individual’s assets. The Shareholder’s Agreement further provides that if at any time a record or beneficial holder of class B common shares ceases to be a Permitted Transferee, such holder (i) will not be entitled to exercise the voting rights attached to such class B common shares and (ii) will notify Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors that it is no longer a Permitted Transferee, which notification shall be deemed to be a request to convert such class B common shares into class A common shares. By its terms, the Shareholder's Agreement may not be amended, other than for manifest error, except by approval of a majority of the class A common shareholders (other than the Significant shareholder and Permitted Transferees) at a general shareholders’ meeting.
73
Table of Contents
Memorandum of Understanding between Mittal Steel, Arcelor and the Significant Shareholder
The following summarizes certain provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding that remain in effect other than those relating to the Offer and corporate governance aspects, the latter of which are summarized under “Management—Mittal Steel / Arcelor Memorandum of Understanding” below. In the summary below, references to the “Company” refer to each of Mittal Steel and Arcelor pre-merger, and to the parent company in Mittal Steel following the merger of Arcelor and Mittal Steel.
Post-Offer Merger
The parties to the MOU agreed to use their best efforts to cause the merger of Mittal Steel into Arcelor, with Arcelor continuing to be incorporated, domiciled and headquartered in Luxembourg.
Confirmation of Social Commitments
Mittal Steel agreed to respect fully all of Arcelor’s commitments regarding employment and other social and human relations policies. Under the Memorandum of Understanding, Mittal Steel and Arcelor agreed that there will be no restructuring plan, collective lay-offs or other employee reduction plan within Arcelor in the European Union as a result of the integration of Mittal Steel and Arcelor, other than in connection with (i) Arcelor’s previously-announced restructuring plans and (ii) the remedy package agreed by Mittal Steel with the European Commission.
Independence of the Company
The parties to the MOU agreed that, during the Initial Term (that is, from August 1, 2006 until August 1, 2009), the Significant shareholder will not increase its representation on the Company’s Board of Directors to attempt to remove a director (other than a director appointed by it) or attempt to make any change to the composition or size of the Company’s Board of Directors.
After the end of the Initial Term, and subject to the provisions of the articles of association, the Significant shareholder will be entitled to representation on the Company’s Board of Directors in proportion to its shareholding.
Related Party Transactions
The parties to the MOU have agreed that any transaction between the Company (including any of its subsidiaries) and its directors or any of its affiliates will be conducted on an arms’ length basis and, if material, require approval of the independent directors. The Company’s Board of Directors will be entitled to request the assistance of expert advisers as it deems necessary and appropriate from time to time in connection with any key strategic decision.
Standstill
The Significant shareholder agreed not to acquire, directly or indirectly, ownership or control of an amount of shares in the capital stock of the Company exceeding the percentage of shares in the Company that it will own or control following completion of the Offer and any subsequent offer or compulsory buy-out, except with the prior written consent of a majority of the independent directors on the Company’s Board of Directors. Any shares acquired in violation of this restriction will be deprived of voting rights and shall be promptly sold by the Significant shareholder.
Notwithstanding the above, if (and whenever) the Significant shareholder holds, directly and indirectly, less than 45% of the then-issued Company shares, the Significant shareholder may purchase (in the open market or otherwise) Company shares up to such 45% limit. In addition, the Significant shareholder is also permitted to own and vote shares in excess of the threshold mentioned in the immediately preceding paragraph or the 45% limit mentioned above, if such ownership results from (a) subscription for shares or rights in proportion to its existing shareholding in the Company where other shareholders have not exercised the entirety of their rights or (b) a reduction of the number of Company shares (for example, through self-tender offers or share buy-backs) if the decisions to implement such measures were taken at a shareholders’ meeting in which the Significant shareholder did not vote or by the Company’s Board of Directors with a majority of independent directors voting in favor. Finally, the Significant shareholder is also permitted to own and vote shares in excess of the threshold
74
Table of Contents
mentioned in the immediately preceding paragraph or the 45% limit mentioned above if it acquires the excess shares in the context of a takeover bid by a third party and (i) a majority of the independent directors of the Company’s Board of Directors consents in writing to such acquisition by the Significant shareholder or (ii) the Significant shareholder acquires such shares in an offer for all of the shares of the Company.
Lock-up
During the five-year period following the settlement date of the Offer, the Significant shareholder has agreed not to transfer (and to cause its affiliates not to transfer) directly or indirectly any of the shares in the Company that it holds without the approval of a majority of the independent directors of the Company, other than in connection with (i) an acquisition proposal by a third party recommended by the majority of the independent directors of the Company or (ii) the tender of shares by the Significant shareholder in a self-tender offer by the Company. As an exception to the foregoing, during the period from the second anniversary of the settlement date of the Offer until the end of the above-referenced five-year lock-up period, the Significant shareholder may sell an amount of shares not exceeding 5% of the Company’s then-outstanding share capital without the consent of a majority of the Company’s independent directors.
The above standstill and lock-up undertakings will cease to have effect if the Significant shareholder no longer owns or controls at least 15% of the Company’s outstanding share capital.
Non-compete
For so long as the Significant shareholder holds at least 15% of the outstanding shares of the Company or has representatives on the Company’s Board of Directors or Group Management Board, the Significant shareholder and its affiliates will not be permitted to invest in, or carry on, any business competing with the Company, except for PT. Ispat Indo.
75
Table of Contents
This section discusses the principal environmental liabilities of Mittal Steel and the principal legal actions to which Mittal Steel is a party. In addition, Mittal Steel is a party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. ArcelorMittal is not currently a party to any material legal proceedings.
Environmental Liabilities
Mittal Steel's operations are subject to a broad range of laws and regulations relating to the protection of human health and the environment at its multiple locations and operating subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2006, Mittal Steel had established reserves of approximately $830 million for environmental liabilities. Previous owners of Mittal Steel's facilities expended in the past, and Mittal Steel expects to expend in the future, substantial amounts to achieve or maintain ongoing compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations.
USA
In 1990, Mittal Steel USA’s Indiana Harbor (East) facility was party to a lawsuit filed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) under the RCRA. In 1993, Mittal Steel USA entered into a consent decree, which, among other things, requires facility-wide RCRA corrective action and Indiana Harbor Ship Canal sediment assessment and remediation.
Mittal Steel USA’s properties in Lackawanna, New York are subject to an Administrative Order on Consent with the EPA requiring facility-wide RCRA corrective action. The Administrative Order, entered into in 1990 by the former owner, Bethlehem Steel, requires Mittal Steel to perform a Remedial Facilities Investigation (“RFI”) and corrective measures study, to complete corrective measures, and to perform any required post-remedial activities. In 2004, the RFI was completed, and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and Mittal Steel USA executed an Order on Consent to perform interim corrective measures at a former benzol storage tank area.
In 1997, Bethlehem Steel, the EPA and the Maryland Department of the Environment agreed to a phased RFI as part of a comprehensive multimedia pollution Consent Decree for investigation and remediation at Mittal Steel USA’s Sparrows Point, Maryland facility. Mittal Steel USA has assumed Bethlehem Steel’s ongoing obligations under the Consent Decree. The Consent Decree requires Mittal Steel USA to address compliance, closure and post-closure care matters and implement corrective measures associated with two on-site landfills, perform a site-wide investigation, continue the operation and maintenance of a remediation system at an idle rod and wire mill and address several pollution prevention items. The potential costs, as well as the time frame of possible remediation activities, which Mittal Steel currently considers probable, relating to the site-wide investigation at Sparrows Point, cannot be reasonably estimated until more of the investigations required by the Consent Decree have been completed and the data therefrom analyzed.
Mittal Steel USA is required to prevent acid mine drainage from discharging to surface waters at closed mining operations in southwestern Pennsylvania. In 2003, Mittal Steel USA entered into a Consent Order and Agreement with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (the “PaDEP”) addressing the transfer of required permits from Bethlehem Steel to Mittal Steel USA and providing financial assurance for long-term operation and maintenance of the wastewater treatment facilities associated with these mines. As required by this Consent Order and Agreement, Mittal Steel USA submitted an operational improvement plan to improve treatment facility operations and lower long-term wastewater treatment costs. The Consent Order and Agreement also required Mittal Steel USA to propose a long-term financial assurance mechanism. In 2004, Mittal Steel USA entered into a revised Consent Order and Agreement outlining a schedule for implementation of capital improvements and requiring the establishment of a treatment trust that the PaDEP has estimated to be the net present value of all future treatment cost. Mittal Steel USA expects to fund the treatment trust over a period of up to ten years at a current target value of approximately $20 million until the improvements are made and the treatment trust is fully funded. After the treatment trust is fully funded, the treatment trust will then be used to fund the cost of treatment of acid mine drainage. Although remote, Mittal Steel USA could be required to make up any deficiency in the treatment trust in the future.
On August 8, 2006, the EPA issued Mittal Steel USA’s Burns Harbor, Indiana facility a Notice of Violation (“NOV”) alleging that in early 1994 the facility (then owned by Bethlehem Steel, from whom the assets were acquired out of bankruptcy) commenced a major modification of its #2 Coke Battery without obtaining a
76
Table of Contents
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (“PSD”) permit and has continued to operate without the appropriate PSD permit. In October and November 2006, Mittal Steel USA met with the EPA to obtain a preliminary understanding of the allegations and the EPA’s technical bases for the NOV. Further communication and discussion with the EPA is planned.
Legal Claims
Mittal Steel is a party to various legal actions. As of December 31, 2006, Mittal Steel has established reserves of approximately $440 million for such actions. The principal legal actions are disclosed below.
United States
In July, 2004, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (the “IEPA”) notified Indiana Harbor (East) that it had identified that facility as a potentially responsible party in connection with alleged contamination relating to Hillside Mining Co. (“Hillside”), a company that Indiana Harbor (East) acquired in 1943, operated until the late 1940’s and then sold the assets of in the early 1950’s, in conjunction with the corporate dissolution of that company. The IEPA is requesting that Indiana Harbor (East) and other potentially responsible parties conduct an investigation of certain areas of potential contamination. Indiana Harbor (East) intends to defend itself fully in this matter. As of December 31, 2006, it is not possible to reasonably estimate the amount of environmental liabilities relating to this matter.
Canada
In March 2004, a group of residents in Nova Scotia brought a potential class action in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia against various parties, including Mittal Canada, alleging various torts for damage allegedly caused by the steel plant and coke ovens formerly owned and occupied by Dominion Steel and Coal Corporation from 1927 to 1967. Mittal Steel acquired Mittal Canada in 1994, and the plaintiffs are attempting to establish that Mittal Canada thereby assumed the liabilities of the former occupiers. The plaintiffs seek to have the claim approved as a class action, though the court has not yet issued a decision on this matter. As of December 31, 2006, Mittal Steel is unable to assess the outcome of these proceedings or to reasonably estimate the amount of Mittal Canada's liabilities relating to this matter, if any.
All of the matters discussed above are legacy environmental matters arising from acquisitions.
Mittal Steel North America Inc. and Mittal Steel Roman are involved in a dispute with Canadian Natural Resources Limited (“CNRL”). Mittal Steel has learned that on March 30 and April 3, 2007, CNRL filed complaints in Calgary, Alberta for negligence seeking damages of $56.4 million and $25.4 million respectively. As of this time, the complaints have not been served on either Mittal Steel entity. The plaintiff alleges that it purchased defective pipe manufactured by Mittal Steel Roman and sold by Mittal Steel Roman and Mittal Steel North America Inc. Mittal Steel is unable to reasonably estimate the amount of Mittal Steel North America Inc.’s and Mittal Steel Roman’s liabilities relating to this matter, if any.
Mexico
Siderurgia Lázaro Cárdenas las trunchas S.A. de C.V. (“Sicartsa”) is involved in a dispute with Ejido Santa Maria of the Municipality of La Union Guerrero over the payment of materials and related damages under a Joint Venture Agreement between the parties. In October 2006, the Agrarian Unity Tribunal entered a judgment ordering Sicartsa to pay the plaintiff damages of $54 million. In April 2007, upon appeal by Sicartsa, a higher court set aside the judgment and ordered further expert evidence relating to the matters in dispute. Mittal Steel and other subsidiaries, as purchasers under the Sicartsa Share Purchase Agreement (“SPA”), have served notice on Pacifico, S.A. de C.V., and Conjunto Siderúrgico del Balsas, S.A. de C.V., as sellers under the SPA seeking indemnity for any damages that may be incurred with respect to this claim, since it was not disclosed in connection with the acquisition.
South America
The Brazilian Federal Revenue Service has claimed that Belgo Siderurgia S.A. (“Belgo”) owes certain amounts for IPI (Manufactured Goods Tax) concerning its use of tax credits on the purchase of raw materials that were non-taxable, exempt from tax or subject to a 0% tax rate and the disallowance of IPI credits recorded five to ten years after the relevant acquisition.
77
Table of Contents
In September 2000, two construction companies filed a complaint with the Brazilian Economic Law Department against three long steel producers, including Belgo. The complaint alleged that these producers colluded to raise prices in the Brazilian rebar market, thereby violating applicable antitrust laws. In September 2005, the Brazilian Antitrust Council (CADE) issued a decision against Belgo that resulted in Belgo’s having to pay a penalty of $36 million. Belgo has appealed the decision to the Brazilian Federal Court. In September 2006, Belgo offered a letter guarantee and obtained an injunction to suspend enforcement of this decision pending the court’s judgment.
As a result of the foregoing decision by CADE, customers of Belgo commenced civil proceedings for damages. There is also a related class action commenced by the Federal Public Prosecutor of the state of Minas Gerais against Belgo for damages based on the alleged violations investigated by CADE.
In 2003, the Brazilian Federal Revenue Service granted CST a tax benefit for certain investments. CST had received certificates from SUDENE, the former Agency for the Development of the Northeast Region of Brazil, confirming CST’s entitlement to this benefit. In September 2004, CST was notified of the annulment of these certificates. CST has pursued its right to this tax benefit though the courts against both ADENE, the successor to SUDENE, and against the Brazilian Federal Revenue Service.
In May 2007, the Brazilian Federal Revenue Service issued a $726 million tax assessment to Belgo to recover taxes primarily related to credit settlements in the context of the 2003 financial reorganization and acquisition of Mendes Júnior Siderurgia S.A. In June 2007, Belgo filed a defense against this assessment through an administrative proceeding. Mittal Steel is unable to assess the outcome of this proceeding or the amount of Belgo’s potential liability.
Europe
In late 2002, three subsidiaries of Mittal Steel (Tréfileurope, Tréfileurope Italia S.r.l. and Fontainunion S.A.), and two former subsidiaries of Arcelor España (Emesa and Galycas), along with other European manufacturers of pre-stressed wire and strands steel products, received notice from the European Commission that it was conducting an investigation into possible anti-competitive practices by these companies. In 2004, Emesa and Galycas were sold. Mittal Steel and its subsidiaries are cooperating fully with the European Commission in this investigation. The European Commission has not yet notified a Statement of Objections to Mittal Steel or any of its subsidiaries. The European Commission can impose fines of up to a maximum of 10% of annual revenues for breaches of EU competition law. Mittal Steel is currently unable to assess the ultimate outcome of the proceedings before the European Commission or the amount of any fines that may result. Arcelor is contractually required to indemnify the present owner of Emesa and Galycas if a fine is imposed on it for any matters under the ownership of Arcelor.
The Competition Council of Romania has commenced investigations against Mittal Steel Galati and Mittal Steel Hunedoara with respect to certain commercial practices. Mittal Steel is cooperating fully with the authorities but cannot at present determine the outcome of the investigations or estimate the amount or range of a potential fine that may be imposed.
In June 2005, the Competition Council of Romania began an investigation concerning alleged state aid received by Mittal Steel Roman in connection with its privatization.
Since 2001, Mittal Steel Ostrava has been involved in a dispute with Kaiser Netherlands B.V. (“Kaiser”), the contractor for phase one of a mini-mill works project (rolling mill P1500), and its parent company, Kaiser Group International. Kaiser Group International and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “KGI”) filed an action in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”) (where these companies commenced Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings) seeking monetary awards against Mittal Steel Ostrava, which has been stayed. On January 6, 2004, Kaiser filed arbitration claims against Mittal Steel Ostrava with the International Court of Arbitration of the ICC in Paris. On May 16, 2006, the arbitration panel awarded Kaiser $7.3 million in favor of its claims and Mittal Steel Ostrava $10.5 million in favor of its claims, resulting in a net award, including costs, of approximately $4.1 million to Mittal Steel Ostrava. As a result of the award, Mittal Steel Ostrava is seeking to enforce its award against Kaiser. Mittal Steel Ostrava has also filed a motion for summary judgment in its favor in the action commenced in the Bankruptcy Court. KGI have opposed that motion. KGI have also filed a motion for summary judgment in the Bankruptcy Court to enforce a portion of the arbitration award against Mittal Steel Ostrava without set-off.
On April 23, 2007, Mittal Steel received a decision of the Financial Directorate in Ostrava, Czech Republic, in which it ordered Mittal Steel Ostrava to pay approximately $106 million for allegedly abusing its economic
78
Table of Contents
position and, as a result, acquiring unjustified profits in respect of prices of blast furnace coke produced by Mittal Steel Ostrava and delivered in 2004. The Financial Directorate subsequently ordered Mittal Steel Ostrava to pay an additional fine of $24.7 million for the period from January to March 2005. After its previous decision in October 2006 was cancelled by the Czech Republic Ministry of Finance, the matter was returned to the Financial Directorate in Ostrava for new investigation and decision. Mittal Steel Ostrava received notice on June 14, 2007 that the Ministry of Finance had upheld the Financial Directorate of Ostrava’s decision. Mittal Steel Ostrava has thirty days from such date to file a petition with the relevant Administrative Court against the decision. Filing the petition, which Mittal Steel Ostrava intends to do, has the effect of suspending payment of the fines.
In 2004, La Direction Générale de la Consommation et de la Repression des Fraudes (the French competition authority) commenced an investigation into alleged anti-competitive practices in the steel distribution sector in France, including Arcelor Négoce Distribution, a subsidiary of Arcelor. The case has been referred to the Conseil de la Concurrence (the French competition council), which is now in charge of the investigation procedure. Any potential fine that might be imposed will depend on the entity that will be considered liable for the alleged practices. No Statement of Objections has yet been issued against Mittal Steel or any of its subsidiaries.
Various retired or present employees of certain Arcelor subsidiaries commenced lawsuits to obtain compensation for asbestos exposure in excess of the amounts paid by French social security. 421 such suits are still pending.
Spanish tax authorities have claimed that amortization recorded by Arcelor Planos Seguntos SL in 1995, 1996 and 1997 is non-deductible for corporation tax purposes. Spanish tax authorities seek payment of $49 million, including the amount of tax, interest and penalties. The case is pending before the court (the Audiencia Nacional), administrative procedures having been exhausted.
South Africa
Mittal Steel South Africa is involved in a dispute with Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited and Durban Roodeport Deep Limited alleging that Mittal Steel South Africa is in violation of the Competition Act. On March 27, 2007, the Competition Tribunal decided that Mittal Steel South Africa had contravened Section 8(a) of the Competition Act by charging an excessive price. The Tribunal has not yet decided upon the relief to be granted, which will be determined at a hearing to commence on July 27, 2007. Decisions of the Competition Tribunal are appealable to the Competition Appeals Court and the Supreme Court of Appeal. The decision of the Competition Tribunal may impact the pricing formulas used by Mittal Steel South Africa and may result in a fine not exceeding 10% of Mittal Steel South Africa’s annual sales for 2003. Mittal Steel appealed the decision on April 19, 2007.
In February 2007, the complaint previously filed with the South African Competition Commission by Barnes Fencing, a South African producer of galvanized wire, alleging that Mittal Steel South Africa, as a “dominant firm”, discriminated in its pricing of low carbon wire rod, was referred to the Competition Tribunal. The complainant seeks, among other sanctions, a penalty of 10% on Mittal Steel South Africa’s sales for 2006 in respect of low carbon wire rod and an order that Mittal Steel South Africa cease its pricing discrimination. The complaint is under review by the Competition Tribunal. Mittal Steel is unable to assess the outcome of this proceeding or the amount of Mittal Steel South Africa’s potential liability, if any.
Mittal Steel South Africa is involved in a dispute with the South African Revenue Service in respect of the tax treatment of payments made under a Business Assistance Agreement of $88 million in 2003 and $105 million in 2004.
79
Table of Contents
Board of Directors
The following table sets forth the current members of the Mittal Steel Board of Directors. The ArcelorMittal Board of Directors will have the same composition following the approval by the sole shareholder of ArcelorMittal of the merger of Mittal Steel into ArcelorMittal.
| Name |
Age(4) | Term Expiration(5) | Position with Mittal Steel | |||
| Lakshmi N. Mittal |
56 | 2010 | Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer | |||
| Joseph J. Kinsch(2)(3) |
73 | 2010 | President of the Board of Directors | |||
| Vanisha Mittal Bhatia |
26 | 2010 | Member of the Board of Directors | |||
| Narayanan Vaghul(1)(3) |
70 | 2010 | Member of the Board of Directors | |||
| Wilbur L. Ross(1)(3) |
69 | 2010 | Member of the Board of Directors | |||
| Lewis B. Kaden(2)(3) |
64 | 2010 | Member of the Board of Directors | |||
| François H. Pinault(3) |
70 | 2010 | Member of the Board of Directors | |||
| José Rámon Álvarez Rendueles(1)(3) |
66 | 2010 | Member of the Board of Directors | |||
| Sergio Silva de Freitas(2)(3) |
63 | 2010 | Member of the Board of Directors | |||
| Georges Schmit |
53 | 2010 | Member of the Board of Directors | |||
| Edmond Pachura(1)(3) |
72 | 2010 | Member of the Board of Directors | |||
| Michel Angel Marti(3) |
59 | 2010 | Member of the Board of Directors | |||
| Manuel Fernández López(3) |
60 | 2010 | Member of the Board of Directors | |||
| Jean-Pierre Hansen(2)(3) |
58 | 2010 | Member of the Board of Directors | |||
| John Castegnaro(3) |
61 | 2010 | Member of the Board of Directors | |||
| Antoine Spillmann |
43 | 2010 | Member of the Board of Directors | |||
| HRH Prince Guillaume de Luxembourg(3) |
43 | 2010 | Member of the Board of Directors | |||
| Romain Zaleski |
73 | 2010 | Member of the Board of Directors |
| (1) | Audit Committee. |
| (2) | Appointments, Remuneration and Corporate Governance Committee. |
| (3) | Independent director. |
| (4) | Age as of December 31, 2006. |
| (5) | Each person will be appointed as a director of ArcelorMittal upon the approval of the merger of Mittal Steel and ArcelorMittal by the sole shareholder of ArcelorMittal. |
The business address of each of the members of the Board of Directors shall be ArcelorMittal’s registered office at 19, Avenue de la Liberté, L-2930 Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
Lakshmi N. Mittal, 56, is the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Mittal Steel and will be the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of ArcelorMittal. He is the founder of Mittal Steel and has been responsible for its strategic direction and development. He is also a non-executive director of Mittal Steel South Africa, an executive committee member of the International Iron and Steel Institute, a member of the Foreign Investment Council in Kazakhstan, the International Investment Council in South Africa, the World Economic Forum’s International Business Council, a director of ICICI Bank Ltd. and is on the Advisory Board of the Kellogg School of Management in the United States. At the end of 2006, Mr. Mittal was named Man of the Year by the Financial Times, Business Person of 2006 by The Sunday Times, Gewinner 2006 for Die Welt, and Newsmaker of the Year by Time magazine. Mr. Mittal was awarded Fortune magazine’s “European Businessman of the Year 2004” and was named “Entrepreneur of the Year” by The Wall Street Journal in 2004. He was previously named Steel Maker of the Year in 1996 by New Steel, a leading industry publication, and was awarded the 8th honorary Willy Korf Steel Vision Award, the highest recognition for worldwide achievement in the steel industry. The award was presented by American Metal Market and World Steel Dynamics. Mr. Mittal has been chosen for the 2007 Dwight D. Eisenhower Global Leadership Award.
Joseph Kinsch, 73, has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Arcelor since 2002. He is currently the President of the Board of Directors of Mittal Steel and will be the President of the Board of Directors of ArcelorMittal. He has been Chairman of the Appointments and Remunerations Committee of Arcelor since 2002. At the helm of Luxembourg-based steelmaker Arbed, he has been one of the key consolidators in the global steel industry in recent decades, first by reshaping Arbed’s strategy and steering its growth, notably in Europe and Brazil, then by assuming a significant role in the three-way merger of European steel companies which resulted in Arcelor, and recently by negotiating the merger between Arcelor and Mittal Steel. Mr. Kinsch joined Arbed in
80
Table of Contents
1961 at its Burbach (Saar, Germany) plant. A year later, he moved to the company’s headquarters in Luxembourg. There, he held various financial (accounting and finance) and industrial (steel-processing) positions. In 1975, he was named Director of Accounting and Finance, then head of steel processing firms in 1978. He joined the Arbed management board in 1985 and was named Chief Executive Officer in 1992 and Chairman of the Board of Directors in 1993. In 1998, he withdrew from daily management, but retained his position as Chairman. In 2002, at the creation of Arcelor, he was chosen to chair the Board of Directors of the new company. Mr. Kinsch is also Président honoraire of the Union of Luxembourg Enterprises, Président honoraire of the Chamber of Commerce of the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg and Honorary Consul of Brazil in Luxembourg. He holds a Master’s degree in Economics and is a Doctor of Humane Letters, honoris causa, from the Sacred Heart University of Luxembourg.
Vanisha Mittal Bhatia, 26, was appointed as a member of the LNM Holdings Board of Directors in June 2004. Mrs. Vanisha Mittal Bhatia was appointed to Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors in December 2004. She has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Business Administration from the European Business School and has completed corporate internships at Mittal Shipping Limited, Mittal Steel Hamburg GmbH and an Internet-based venture capital fund. She is the daughter of Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal.
Narayanan Vaghul, 70, has 49 years of experience in the financial sector and has been the Chairman of Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Limited for 16 years and of ICICI Bank Ltd. for the last two years. Prior to that, he was Chairman of the Bank of India and Executive Director of the Central Bank of India. He was chosen as the Businessman of the Year in 1992 by Business India, a leading Indian publication, and has served as a consultant to the World Bank, the International Finance Corporation and the Asian Development Bank. Mr. Vaghul was also a visiting Professor at the Stern Business School at New York University. Mr. Vaghul is Chairman of the Indian Institute of Finance Management & Research and is also a board member of various other companies, including Wipro Limited, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, Nicholas Piramal India Limited, Apollo Hospitals Limited and Himatsingka Seide Limited.
Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., 69, has served as the Chairman of the ISG Board of Directors since ISG’s inception. Mr. Ross is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of WL Ross & Co. LLC, a merchant banking firm, a position he has held since April 2000. Mr. Ross is also the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of WLR Recovery Fund L.P., WLR Recovery Fund II L.P., Asia Recovery Fund, Asia Recovery Fund Co-Investment, Nippon Investment Partners and Absolute Recovery Hedge Fund. Mr. Ross is also the general partner of WLR Recovery Fund L.P., WLR Recovery Fund II L.P., Asia Recovery Fund, and Absolute Recovery Hedge Fund. Mr. Ross is also Chairman of Ohizumi Manufacturing Company in Japan, Chairman of International Textile Group, International Coal Group and Marquis Who’s Who, Inc. in the United States, and Chairman of Insuratex, Ltd. in Bermuda. Mr. Ross is a board member of the Turnaround Management Association and Nikko Electric Co. in Japan, Tong Yang Life Insurance Co. in Korea, and Syms Corp., Clarent Hospital Corp. and News Communications Inc. in the United States. He is also Director of IAC Acquisition Corporation, Ltd. in the United Kingdom, Compagnie Européenne de Wagons SARL in Luxembourg, Oxford Automotive in Denmark and Safety Components International in the United States. He is Director of the Japan Society and of the Yale School of Management. Mr. Ross is also a member of the Business Roundtable. Previously, Mr. Ross served as the Executive Managing Director at Rothschild Inc., an investment banking firm, from October 1974 to March 2000. Mr. Ross was also Chairman of the Smithsonian Institution National Board.
Lewis B. Kaden, 64, has approximately 38 years of experience in corporate governance, dispute mediation, labor and employment law and economic policy. He is currently Vice Chairman and Chief Administrative Officer of Citigroup Inc. Prior to that, he was a partner at the law firm of Davis Polk & Wardwell, and served as counsel to the Governor of New Jersey, as a Professor of Law at Columbia University and as director of Columbia’s Center for Law and Economic Studies. He served as a director of Bethlehem Steel Corporation for ten years and is currently Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Markle Foundation. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the moderator of the Business-Labor Dialogue. Mr. Kaden is a graduate of Harvard College and of Harvard Law School. He was the John Harvard Scholar at Emmanuel College, Cambridge University.
François H. Pinault, 70, is the founder and former president of the Artemis Group and PPR. The Artemis Group is a €25 billion global investment holding company with wide-ranging interests, including 42% of the listed company PPR. PPR includes retail brands, such as FNAC, La Redoute, Le Printemps and Conforama, and luxury brands, such as Gucci Group, which includes Gucci, Bottega Veneta, Yves Saint Laurent, Boucheron and Balenciaga. Artemis also owns Chateau Latour vineyard in France and Christie’s auction house. Mr. Pinault also owns insurance and media businesses and holds minority shares in the French group Bouygues. Mr. Pinault serves on the Board of Directors of Financière Pinault and Artemis.
81
Table of Contents
José Ramón Álvarez Rendueles, 66, is Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors and President of the Audit Committee of Arcelor. He has extensive experience in the financial, economic and industrial sectors. He was former Governor of the Bank of Spain and President of the Bank Zaragozano. He is President of the Board of Directors of Arcelor España, Peugeot España and Pirelli España. He is also a professor of public finance at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, the President of the Prince of Asturias Foundation and a Director of Gestavisíon Telecinco S.A.
Sergio Silva de Freitas, 63, has 40 years of experience in the financial sector. He is President of the Board of Directors and of the Audit, Appointments and Remunerations Committees of Arcelor Brasil. After several years spent in high-ranking positions in important financial institutions in London and in Washington, he became Senior Vice-President of Banco Itaù and is now a member of the International Advisory Board of Banco Itaù, Sao Paulo, Brazil. He has a bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering from Escola Nacional de Engenharia da Universidade Brasil.
Georges Schmit, 53, is a member of the Board of Directors of Mittal Steel and Arcelor as a representative of the Luxembourg State. He is Director General at the Ministry of the Economy and Foreign Trade and a Member of the Board of Economic Development of the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg. He is also Vice-Chairman of the Société Nationale de Crédit et d’Investissement (SNCI) and of the Entreprise des Postes et Télécommunications, Luxembourg and a Director of SES Global S.A., Banque et Caisse d’Epargne de l’Etat, Luxembourg and Paul Wurth S.A. Since 2000, he has been the representative of Luxembourg on the Enterprise Policy Group, an advisory body to the European Commission. Mr. Schmit holds a Master of Arts degree in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Edmond Pachura, 72, has 40 years of experience in the industrial sector. He is Chairman of the Union des Négociants en Aciers Spéciaux (UNAS), Paris. Previously, he was a Director of Renault and the CEO of Sollac. Mr. Pachura has also been a member of the Board of Directors of Charbonnages de France since 1997 and of the SNCF (Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer) since 1998.
Michel Angel Marti, 59, is a member of the Board of Directors of Mittal Steel and Arcelor as a representative of the employees. He is a former Secretary of the Conféderation Française Démocratique du Travail (CFDT) union, Broye, France.
Manuel Fernández López, 60, is a member of the Board of Directors of Mittal Steel and Arcelor as a representative of the employees. He is also Secretary General of the Metal, Construcción y Afines de UGT union, Federación Estatal (M.C.A.-U.G.T.), Madrid, Spain.
Jean-Pierre Hansen, 58, is a member of the Board of Directors of Mittal Steel and Arcelor as a representative of the Wallonia region. He is also Vice-Chairman of the Executive Committee and Senior Executive Vice-President of SUEZ, with responsibility for Operations. He entered the electricity and gas sector in 1975. Since January 1, 2005, Mr. Hansen has been Vice-Chairman and CEO of Electrabel, a role he previously held from 1992 to March 1999. Since March 1999, he has also held the position of Chairman of the Executive Committee of Electrabel. He is also CEO of SUEZ-Tractebel, Chairman of Fabricom and Director of Distrigas, Fluxys, AGBAR and ACEA, Vice-Chairman of the Federation of Enterprises in Belgium, and associate professor of economics at the UCL and at the Ecole Polytechnique (Paris). Mr. Hansen holds a master’s degree in electrical engineering, a degree in economics and a doctorate in engineering.
John O. Castegnaro, 61, is a member of the Mittal Steel and Arcelor Board of Directors and has been a member of the Board of Directors of Arcelor as a representative of the employees since 2002. He is a member of the Luxembourg Parliament and Honorary Chairman of trade-union Onhofhängege Gewerkschaftsbond Lëtzebuerg (OGB-L).
Antoine Spillmann, 43, is a member of the Board of Directors of Mittal Steel and Arcelor as a representative of Corporación JMAC B.V. After several years spent in different banks, mainly in the United Kingdom, he is now Asset Manager and executive partner at the firm Bruellan, an asset management company based in Geneva.
H.R.H. Prince Guillaume de Luxembourg, 43, is a member of the Board of Directors of Mittal Steel and Arcelor. He worked for six months at the International Monetary Fund in Washington and spent two years at the Commission of European Communities in Brussels. He studied at Oxford University in the United Kingdom and graduated from Georgetown University in the United States.
82
Table of Contents
Romain Zaleski, 73, graduated from the Ecole Polytechnique and from the Ecole des Mines de Paris (Mining School). He then served as a technical consultant in the public service, in particular at the Ministry of Industry. After leaving the public service, he was appointed as a managing director in several groups related to industry and to banking. In 1984, he settled in Italy and dedicated himself to the reorganization and the development of the Carlo Tassara SpA group, a leading group operating in the sectors of heavy industry, steel industry, ironworks, metallurgy and production of electric power. He led the Carlo Tassara group to its current position, with the holding of interests in the banking sector in Mittel, Banca Intesa, Banca Lombarda and Generali, as well as in the industrial sector, in Eramet and Mittal Steel. A managing director of the Carlo Tassara group and of Banca Lombarda, one of the top ten Italian banks, from 2003 to 2005, Mr. Zaleski was also chairman of Italenergia Bis, a holding company of the Edison Group, the second largest producer of electric power in Italy.
Senior Management
The current members of Mittal Steel’s senior management, who will remain in their roles after effectiveness of the merger with ArcelorMittal, are as set forth below, along with each member’s age and position at Mittal Steel:
| Name |
Age(1) | Position | ||
| Bhikam Agarwal |
54 | Executive Vice President, Responsible for Financial Controlling and Reporting | ||
| Roeland Baan |
49 | Executive Vice President, Responsible for South and Central Africa and Pipes and Tubes | ||
| Alain Bouchard |
60 | Executive Vice President, Responsible for Purchasing function on a Worldwide basis | ||
| Jose Armando Campos |
58 | Executive Vice President, Responsible for Flat South America | ||
| Narendra Chaudhary |
62 | Executive Vice President, Responsible for Carbon Steel Asia, Mediterranean, Black Sea Basin | ||
| Davinder Chugh |
50 | Senior Executive Vice President, Responsible for Shared Services | ||
| Christophe Cornier |
54 | Executive Vice President, Responsible for Flat Europe | ||
| Philippe Darmayan |
54 | Executive Vice President, Responsible for Arcelor Mittal Steel Solutions & Services (AM3S) | ||
| Bernard Fontana |
45 | Executive Vice President, Responsible for Human Resources | ||
| Jean-Yves Gilet |
50 | Executive Vice President, Responsible for Stainless Steel Worldwide | ||
| Roland Junck |
51 | Member of the Group Management Board, Advisor to the CEO | ||
| Sudhir Maheshwari |
43 | Executive Vice President, Responsible for Finance and M&A | ||
| Aditya Mittal |
30 | Chief Financial Officer, Member of the Group Management Board, Flat Products Americas | ||
| Lakshmi N. Mittal |
56 | Chief Executive Officer, Member of the Group Management Board | ||
| Malay Mukherjee |
58 | Member of the Group Management Board, Stainless, Mining, Asia & Africa | ||
| Carlo Panunzi |
57 | Executive Vice President, Responsible for Long Americas | ||
| Michael Pfitzner |
57 | Executive Vice President, Responsible for Commercial Co-ordination | ||
83
Table of Contents
| Name |
Age(1) | Position | ||
| Gerhard Renz |
59 | Executive Vice President, Responsible for Long Europe | ||
| Michael Rippey |
49 | Executive Vice President, Responsible for USA | ||
| Lou Schorsch |
57 | Executive Vice President, Responsible for Flat Americas | ||
| Bill Scotting |
48 | Executive Vice President, Responsible for Performance Enhancement | ||
| Gonzalo Urquijo |
45 | Member of the Group Management Board, Responsible for Long Products, Distribution and Wire Drawing | ||
| André van den Bossche |
63 | Executive Vice President, Responsible for Marketing | ||
| Michel Wurth |
52 | Member of the Group Management Board, Responsible for Flat Products Europe, Global Auto, Plates and R&D | ||
| (1) | Age as of December 31, 2006. |
The business address of each of the members of ArcelorMittal’s senior management shall be ArcelorMittal’s registered office at 19, Avenue de la Liberté, L-2930 Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
Bhikam Agarwal, Executive Vice President, Responsible for Financial Controlling and Reporting: Bhikam Agarwal has been the Managing Director, Controlling of Mittal Steel and has over 30 years of experience in steel and related industries. He has held various senior executive positions within Mittal Steel and was previously Chief Financial Officer after its formation as Ispat International. He has been responsible for the financial strategy of Mittal Steel and has been a co-ordinator of its prior activities in the capital markets. Mr. Agarwal has also led the finance and accounting functions of Ispat International across all its operating subsidiaries.
Roeland Baan, Executive Vice President, Responsible for South and Central Africa and Pipes and Tubes: Roeland Baan has been Chief Executive Officer of Mittal Steel Europe. He joined Mittal Steel from the global conglomerate SHV Holdings, which lists metals recycling among its non-core activities. There he spent eight years as a member of the Energy Divisions Executive Committee and was responsible for developing and executing its strategy across a number of key regions including Europe, South America and the Mediterranean rim. Prior to that, Mr. Baan spent 16 years with Shell, where he held a number of positions worldwide. He has a Master’s degree in Economics from Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam.
Alain Bouchard, Executive Vice President, Responsible for Purchasing function on a Worldwide basis: Alain Bouchard has been Arcelor’s Executive Vice President Purchasing since 2004. Prior to that he was in charge, at Arcelor and Usinor, of the Cockerill-Sambre works in Liège, Belgium and at Sollac Lorraine. From 1993 to 1999, he held various positions in production planning, customer services, information systems-information technology, and reengineering of support functions within Usinor’s Flat Carbon Steel business in Paris. From 1989 to 1993, he worked at Usinor’s Fos-sur-Mer plant, after joining the IRSID Steel Research and Development Institute in 1973. Mr. Bouchard is an IT engineer, a graduate of the Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Informatique et Mathématiques Appliquées de Grenoble, and a Physics engineer, with a degree from Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Physique de Grenoble.
Jose Armando Campos, Executive Vice President, Responsible for Flat South America: Jose Armando Campos has been the President and officer in charge of the Flat Steel Business Area at Arcelor Brasil and President and CEO of CST since 1997. Prior to that, he worked in mining development and metallurgical areas at the Companhia Vale do Rio Doce from 1974 to 1992. Mr. Campos has been a member of the Brazilian Metallurgy and Materials Society since 1972 and the Board of Directors of the Brazilian Business Council for Sustainable Development. Mr. Campos is also a member of the Board of Directors of Acesita. He is a mining engineer, with a degree from the Federal University of Ouro Preto.
Narendra Chaudhary, Executive Vice President, Responsible for Carbon Steel Asia, Mediterranean, Black Sea Basin: Narendra Chaudhary was appointed CEO of Mittal Steel’s Ukrainian operation in January 2006. Prior to that, Mr. Chaudhary was Director, Operations and Maintenance for Mittal Steel. Mr. Chaudhary
84
Table of Contents
joined Mittal Steel in 1993 at its Mexican operations and has held a number of positions at Mittal Steel since then, including as CEO of Mittal Steel Galati in Romania and CEO of Mittal Steel’s operations in Kazakhstan. Mr. Chaudhary possesses over 39 years of experience in a variety of technical and managerial functions in the steel industry. He worked at Steel Authority of India Limited plants in various capacities for 28 years. Mr. Chaudhary has a Bachelor’s degree in engineering from Bihar Institute of Technology, India.
Davinder Chugh, Senior Executive Vice President, Responsible for Shared Services: Davinder Chugh, previously CEO of Mittal Steel South Africa, has over 25 years experience in the steel industry, particularly in materials purchasing, logistics, warehousing and shipping. Mr. Chugh also was Commercial Director at Mittal Steel from 2002 to 2006. Before joining Mittal Steel South Africa, he was Vice President of purchasing at Mittal Steel Europe. Mr. Chugh joined Mittal Steel in 1995 and since then has successfully integrated the materials management functions at newly acquired plants in Hamburg, Duisburg, France, Romania and Algeria. Prior to that, he held several senior positions at the Steel Authority of India Limited in New Delhi, India. He holds degrees in science and law and has a Masters of Business Administration.
Christophe Cornier, Executive Vice President, Responsible for Flat Europe: Christophe Cornier has been responsible for Arcelor’s flat products activities in Europe and for its worldwide automotive sector since December 2005, when he was appointed a member of the Arcelor’s Management Committee. In June 2005, he was appointed head of Arcelor’s Client Value Team. At the creation of Arcelor in 2002, he was named Executive Vice-President of FCS Commercial Auto. Before that, he was CEO of Sollac Méditerranée. In 1998, he was appointed CEO of La Magona, after joining Sollac Packaging as Managing Director in 1993. In 1985 he joined Usinor, where he was Business Development Director and Chief Controller of Sollac. He began his career with the French Ministry of Industry, which he left as a Deputy Director. Mr. Cornier is a graduate of the Ecole Polytechnique and the Ecole des Mines in Paris.
Philippe Darmayan, Executive Vice President, Responsible for Arcelor Mittal Steel Solutions & Services (AM3S): Philippe Darmayan has been Executive Vice President in charge of Arcelor Steel Solutions and Services since January 2005. Before that, he was CEO of Ugine & Alz. A graduate of the French business school HEC, Mr. Darmayan joined Arcelor to lead the transformation of Ugine & Alz in 2002. Prior to that, he held various management positions in the aluminum businesses of Pechiney Group, which he joined in 1996, and was a plant director and managing director of Franco-Belge de Fabrication de Combustibles, a subsidiary of Framatome.
Bernard Fontana, Executive Vice President, Responsible for Human Resources: Bernard Fontana joined Arcelor in September 2004 as Flat Carbon Steel Program Office Executive manager and was appointed as Arcelor Flat Carbon Europe Executive Vice President/People and Development in July 2005. Prior to that, he worked at the Chemical Group SNPE for 18 years, including as SNPE’s North American Director and as Executive Vice President of SNPE. Mr. Fontana graduated from the Ecole Polytechnique and the Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Techniques Avancées in Paris.
Jean-Yves Gilet, Executive Vice President, Responsible for Stainless Steel Worldwide: Jean-Yves Gilet has been advisor to the CEO with responsibility for Arcelor’s stainless steel business worldwide since December 2005, in charge of preparing and implementing the strategic reorganization of this business. Prior to that, he was Senior Executive Vice President of Arcelor in charge of the stainless steel sector, a position he held since the creation of Arcelor in 2002. In 1999, he became a member of the Usinor executive committee. In 1998, he was named Chairman and CEO of Acesita in Brazil. He joined Usinor in 1990 and, between 1991 and 1998, held management positions at the Imphy, Ugine-Savoie and Sprint Métal stainless businesses. Prior to that, he was cabinet head for the Regional Development and Minister in France. Mr. Gilet, an engineering graduate of the Ecole Polytechnique (Corps des Mines), began his career in 1981 at the Industry Ministry, before joining DATAR, the regional development agency.
Roland Junck, Member of the Group Management Board, Advisor to the CEO: Roland Junck was previously a member of the Group Management Board of Arcelor with responsibility for the global Long Carbon Steel and Wire Drawing business and for China. He started his career with Arbed in 1980 in the rolling mills at Dudelange, before moving to Esch-Schifflange in 1985. In 1993, Mr. Junck was named General Manager of TrefilArbed Bissen, being appointed Managing Director in 1996. He was named Senior Vice President of Aceralia in 1998 and was a member of the Arbed Group Management Board from 1999 until 2002, when he was appointed Senior Executive Vice President of the newly created Arcelor, in charge of the Long Carbon Steel Sector. Mr. Junck graduated from the Federal Polytechnic in Zurich and earned a Masters of Business Administration from Sacred Heart University of Luxembourg.
85
Table of Contents
Sudhir Maheshwari, Executive Vice President, Responsible for Finance and M&A: Sudhir Maheshwari was previously the Managing Director, Business Development and Treasury of Mittal Steel and has 20 years of experience in steel and related industries. He was the Chief Financial Officer of LNM Holdings from January 2002 until its merger with Ispat International in December 2004. He has played an integral role in all the recent acquisitions by Mittal Steel, including turnaround and integration activities, and in various corporate finance and capital market projects, including Mittal Steel’s initial public offering in 1997. He also held the positions of Chief Financial Officer at Mittal Steel Europe, Mittal Steel Germany and Mittal Steel Point Lisas, and was Director of Finance and Mergers & Acquisitions at Mittal Steel. Mr. Maheshwari has worked for Mittal Steel for 18 years. Mr. Maheshwari is an Honours Graduate in Accounting and Commerce from St. Xavier’s College, Calcutta, and a Fellow Member of The Institute of Chartered Accountants and The Institute of Company Secretaries in India.
Aditya Mittal, CFO, Member of the Group Management Board, Responsible for Flat Products Americas: Aditya Mittal held the position of President and CFO of Mittal Steel from October 2004 to 2006. He joined Mittal Steel in January 1997 and has held various finance and management roles within Mittal Steel. In addition to these responsibilities Aditya Mittal was appointed Head of Mergers and Acquisitions for Mittal Steel in 1999. In this role, he led Mittal Steel’s acquisition strategy, resulting in Mittal Steel’s expansion into Central Europe, Africa and, most recently, the United States. This led to Mittal Steel’s emergence as the world’s largest and most global steel producer, growing its steel-making capacities fourfold. These acquisitions included Kryvorizhstal in Ukraine, Polskie Huty Stali in Poland, Nova Hut in Czech Republic, Sidex in Romania, Annaba in Algeria, Iscor in South Africa, and International Steel Group in the United States. Aditya Mittal holds a Bachelor’s Degree of Science in Economics with concentrations in Strategic Management and Corporate Finance from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, from which he graduated magna cum laude. Aditya Mittal is the son of Lakshmi N. Mittal.
Malay Mukherjee, Member of the Group Management Board, Responsible for Stainless, Mining, Asia & Africa: Mr. Mukherjee has over 30 years of experience in a variety of technical and commercial functions in the steel industry, including iron ore mining, project implementation, materials management and steel plant operations. He joined the LNM Group in 1993 from the Steel Authority of India Limited, where his last position was as Executive Director (Works) at the Bhilai Steel Plant, the largest integrated steel plant in India, with a production capacity of approximately four million tonnes. Mr. Mukherjee has a Master’s degree in mining from the USSR State Commission in Moscow and a Bachelor of Science degree from the Indian Institute of Technology in Kharagpur, India. Mr. Mukherjee has completed an advanced management program conducted by the Commonwealth Secretariat in joint association with University of Ottawa, Canada and the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad. Mr. Mukherjee joined Ispat Karmet in 1996 from Ispat Mexicana, where he was Managing Director. He joined Ispat Europe as President and CEO in June 1999. Formerly the President and Chief Operating Officer of Ispat International N.V., Mr. Mukherjee became Chief Operating Officer of Mittal Steel in October 2004. Mr. Mukherjee is a recipient of the MECON Award from the Indian Institute of Metals.
Carlo Panunzi, Executive Vice President, Responsible for Long Americas: Carlo Panunzi was previously Senior Executive Vice President of Arcelor Brasil, in charge of Long Products and Distribution. In 2002, Carlo Panunzi became the President of Belgo Mineira, a company he had joined in 1999 and where he was, among other positions, Managing Director of the Piracicaba plant in the state of São Paulo. Before that, he held several positions at Arbed, which he joined in 1973 as an engineer at the Differdange plant’s rolling line.
Michael Pfitzner, Executive Vice President, Responsible for Commercial Co-ordination: Michael Pfitzner joined Mittal Steel as Director of Marketing in February 2006. He has over 25 years of extensive industry experience in commercial functions with several steel companies, including Mannesmann, Saarstahl, Krupp Thyssen Stainless and Salzgitter. At Salzgitter, where he worked for nearly five years, Mr. Pfitzner was a member of the Executive Board responsible for Sales and Distribution. Mr. Pfitzner has a degree in economics from the University of Bonn, Germany.
Gerhard Renz, Executive Vice President, Responsible for Long Europe: Gerhard Renz has been the Chief Operating Officer of Mittal Steel Europe and has over 32 years of experience in the steel industry. Mr. Renz formerly worked as the Managing Director of Mittal Steel Hamburg. He is a Board Member of Verein Deutscher Eisenhüttenleute, Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl and the European Iron and Steel Institute. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Engineering.
Michael G. Rippey, Executive Vice President, Responsible for USA: Michael Rippey was elected in August 2006 as President and Chief Executive Officer of Mittal Steel USA. Previously, he had been Mittal Steel
86
Table of Contents
USA’s Executive Vice-President, Sales & Marketing since April 2005, with direct responsibility for all sales and marketing of light flat-rolled and plate products. Mr. Rippey had been Executive Vice-President, Commercial and Chief Financial Officer at Ispat Inland since January 2004 and an officer of Mittal Steel USA since June 1998. He has a Bachelor’s degree in marketing from Indiana University, Bloomington, a Master’s degree in banking and finance from Loyola University, Chicago and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Chicago.
Lou Schorsch, Executive Vice President, Responsible for Flat Americas: Lou Schorsch was elected in August 2006 as President and Chief Executive Officer of Flat Americas. Previously, he had been Chief Executive Officer of Mittal Steel USA since the merger between Mittal Steel and ISG in October 2004. Prior to that, Dr. Schorsch was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Ispat Inland, where he was responsible for significant improvements in its operational performance. Dr. Schorsch has over 25 years of experience in consulting and managerial roles primarily relating to the steel industry. Prior to joining Ispat Inland in October 2003, he held various senior positions in the consulting and e-commerce sectors. Most recently he was President and Chief Executive Officer of GSX.Com and a Principal at McKinsey & Company where he worked from 1985 until 2000. While at McKinsey, he was a co-leader of its metals practice. Dr. Schorsch has published numerous articles in such publications as Business Week and Challenge and has co-authored a book on steel entitled Upheaval in a Basic Industry.
Bill Scotting, Executive Vice President, Responsible for Performance Enhancement: Bill Scotting joined Mittal Steel in September 2002 to lead its performance enhancement activities. Formerly an Associate Principal at McKinsey & Company, Mr. Scotting has 20 years of experience in the steel industry in technical, operations management and consulting roles. He has also held positions at BHP Steel, Pioneer Concrete United Kingdom, Mascott Partnership and CRU International. Mr. Scotting holds a Bachelor of Science degree in metallurgy from the University of Newcastle in Australia, where he was awarded the Australasian Institute of Metallurgy Prize for Metallurgy, and a Masters of Business Administration (with distinction) from Warwick Business School in the United Kingdom.
Gonzalo Urquijo, Member of the Group Management Board, Responsible for Long Products, Distribution and Wire Drawing: Gonzalo Urquijo, previously Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Arcelor, was responsible for the following functions: Finance, Purchasing, IT, Legal Affairs, Investor Relations, Arcelor Steel Solutions & Services and other activities. Mr. Urquijo also held several other positions within Arcelor and in this sector, including Deputy Senior Executive Vice President and head of the functional directorates of distribution. Until the creation of Arcelor in 2002, when he became Executive Vice President of the Operational Unit South of the Flat Carbon Steel sector, Mr. Urquijo was CFO of Aceralia. Between 1984 and 1992, he held a variety of positions at Citibank and Crédit Agricole before joining Aristrain in 1992 as Chief Financial Officer, later becoming Co-Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Urquijo has degrees in economics and political science from Yale University and holds a Masters of Business Administration from the Instituto de Empresa in Madrid.
André van den Bossche, Executive Vice President, Responsible for Marketing: André van den Bossche has been Arcelor’s Executive Vice President Commercial Worldwide Optimisation since 2005. Prior to that, he was Managing Director of Arcelor’s Flat Carbon Steel commercial organization from 2002 to 2005, Managing Director at the Aceralia Sidstahl Ibérica and Sidstahl sales organizations from 1995 to 2001, and sales director at TradeArbed Luxembourg from 1986 to 1995. At Sidmar (Ghent), which he joined in 1970, he was Vice President of the Commercial and Customer Relations Department, General Manager of the cold rolling mill and production and management engineer at the cold rolling mill. Mr. van den Bossche is a civil engineer and graduated from the Universities of Louvain and Ghent.
Michel Wurth, Member of the Group Management Board, Responsible for Flat Products Europe, Global Auto, Plates and R&D: Michel Wurth was previously Vice President of the Group Management Board and Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Arcelor, and was responsible for Flat Carbon Steel Europe & Auto, Flat Carbon Steel Brazil, Coordination Brazil, Coordination Heavy Plate, R&D and NSC Alliance. The merger of Aceralia, Arbed and Usinor which led to the creation of Arcelor in 2002 saw Mr. Wurth appointed as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Arcelor, with responsibility over Finance and Management by Objectives. Mr. Wurth joined Arbed in 1979 and held a variety of positions, including Secretary of the Board of Directors, head of the Arbed subsidiary Novar and Corporate Secretary, before joining the Arbed Group Management Board and becoming Chief Financial Officer in 1996. He was named Executive Vice President of Arbed in 1998. Mr. Wurth holds a law degree from the University of Grenoble, a political science degree from the Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Grenoble and a Master of Economics degree from the London School of Economics.
87
Table of Contents
Board Compensation
The members of the ArcelorMittal Board of Directors have not received any compensation for their services to date. The total annual compensation of the members of Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors for 2005 and 2006 was as follows:
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||
| (Amounts in $ thousands except option information) | 2005 | 2006 | ||||
| Base salary and/or directors fees |
$ | 4,369 | $ | 3,760 | ||
| Short-term performance-related bonus |
— | 3,288 | ||||
| Long-term incentives (number of options) |
235,000 | 175,000 | ||||
The annual compensation of the members of Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors was as follows:
| (Amounts in $ thousands except option information) |
2005 | 2006 | 2005 Short-term Performance Related |
2006 Short-term Performance Related |
2005 Long-term Number of Options |
2006 Long-term Number of Options | ||||||||
| Lakshmi N. Mittal |
$ | 2,194 | $ | 2,005 | — | 1,677 | 100,000 | 100,000 | ||||||
| Aditya Mittal(1) |
1,245 | 942 | — | 1,611 | 75,000 | 75,000 | ||||||||
| Vanisha Mittal Bhatia |
18 | 23 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| Malay Mukherjee(2) |
311 | — | — | — | 60,000 | — | ||||||||
| Narayanan Vaghul |
109 | 139 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| Ambassador Andrés Rozental(3) |
134 | 142 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| Fernando Ruiz Sahagun(4) |
22 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| Muni Krishna T. Reddy(5) |
110 | 119 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| René Lopez(6) |
74 | 82 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| Wilbur L. Ross, Jr.(7) |
73 | 105 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| Lewis B. Kaden(8) |
79 | 123 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| François H. Pinault(9) |
— | 80 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| Joseph Kinsch(10) |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| José Ramón Álvarez-Rendueles Medina(11) |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| Sergio Silva de Freitas(12) |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| Georges Schmit(13) |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| Edmond Pachura(14) |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| Michel Angel Marti(15) |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| Manuel Fernández López(16) |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| Jean-Pierre Hansen(17) |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| John Castegnaro(18) |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| Antoine Spillmann(19) |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| HRH Prince Guillaume de Luxembourg(20) |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| Romain Zaleski(21) |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
| Total |
4,369 | 3,760 | — | 3,288 | 235,000 | 175,000 | ||||||||
| (1) | Mr. A. Mittal resigned from Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors on October 30, 2006, but continued in his role as Chief Financial Officer of Mittal Steel. His compensation is included only for the period from January 2006 to October 2006. |
| (2) | Mr. Mukherjee resigned from Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors on April 12, 2005, but continued in his role as Chief Operating Officer of Mittal Steel. His compensation is included only for the period from January 2005 to March 2005. |
| (3) | Mr. Rozental resigned from Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors on October 30, 2006. |
| (4) | Mr. Ruiz resigned from Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors on April 12, 2005. |
| (5) | Mr. Reddy resigned from Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors on October 30, 2006. |
| (6) | Mr. Lopez resigned from Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors on October 30, 2006. |
| (7) | Mr. Ross was elected to Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors on April 12, 2005. |
| (8) | Mr. Kaden was elected to Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors on April 12, 2005. |
| (9) | Mr. Pinault was elected to Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors on June 30, 2006. |
| (10) | Mr. Kinsch was elected to Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors on October 30, 2006. |
| (11) | Mr. Álvarez-Rendueles Medina was elected to Mittal Steel's Board of Directors on October 30, 2006. |
| (12) | Mr. Silva de Freitas was elected to Mittal Steel’s Board of Directors on October 30, 2006. |