Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

    x     QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

OR

 

    ¨     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from          to         .

Commission File Number: 001-34575

 

 

Cambium Learning Group, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   27-0587428

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

17855 North Dallas Parkway, Suite 400, Dallas, Texas   75287
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (214) 932-9500

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Smaller reporting company   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   x  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Accelerated filer   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding as of July 31, 2012 was 48,997,025.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

          Page  
PART I    FINANCIAL INFORMATION   
  Item 1.    Financial Statements      3   
    

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited) for the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011

     3   
    

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2011

     4   
    

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011

     6   
    

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

     7   
  Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations      24   
  Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk      38   
  Item 4.    Controls and Procedures      38   
PART II    OTHER INFORMATION   
  Item 1.    Legal Proceedings      38   
  Item 1A.    Risk Factors      39   
  Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds      39   
  Item 6.    Exhibits      40   
SIGNATURE PAGE      41   
EXHIBITS      42   


Table of Contents

Part I. Financial Information

 

Item 1. Financial Statements.

Cambium Learning Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
     June 30,     June 30,     June 30,     June 30,  
     2012     2011     2012     2011  

Net revenues

   $ 40,429      $ 57,191      $ 68,284      $ 87,886   

Cost of revenues:

        

Cost of revenues

     14,397        17,819        25,563        28,786   

Amortization expense

     6,579        6,844        12,949        13,462   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total cost of revenues

     20,976        24,663        38,512        42,248   

Research and development expense

     2,652        2,515        5,984        4,894   

Sales and marketing expense

     12,041        12,874        23,937        23,777   

General and administrative expense

     5,061        5,529        10,806        11,341   

Shipping and handling costs

     954        817        1,281        1,151   

Depreciation and amortization expense

     1,591        1,748        3,250        3,484   

Goodwill impairment

     14,700        —          14,700        —     

Embezzlement and related expense (recoveries)

     44        40        (41     (2,396

Impairment of long-lived assets

     320        —          3,111        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total costs and expenses

     58,339        48,186        101,540        84,499   

Income (loss) before interest, other income (expense) and income taxes

     (17,910     9,005        (33,256     3,387   

Net interest expense

     (4,627     (4,882     (9,404     (9,287

Other income, net

     37        2        73        365   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

     (22,500     4,125        (42,587     (5,535

Income tax benefit (expense)

     23        (318     (154     (415
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   $ (22,477   $ 3,807      $ (42,741   $ (5,950
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

        

Amortization of net pension loss

     8        —          17        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

   $ (22,469   $ 3,807      $ (42,724   $ (5,950
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share:

        

Basic net income (loss) per common share

   $ (0.45   $ 0.09      $ (0.86   $ (0.14

Diluted net income (loss) per common share

   $ (0.45   $ 0.09      $ (0.86   $ (0.14

Average number of common shares and equivalents outstanding:

        

Basic

     49,941        43,610        49,944        43,979   

Diluted

     49,941        44,431        49,944        43,979   

The accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

Cambium Learning Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

     June 30,     December 31,  
     2012     2011  
     (unaudited)        
ASSETS     

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 31,603      $ 63,191   

Accounts receivable, net

     25,299        13,485   

Inventory

     20,760        21,561   

Deferred tax assets

     2,800        2,829   

Restricted assets, current

     4,388        1,393   

Assets held for sale

     2,847        2,727   

Other current assets

     4,664        4,735   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     92,361        109,921   

Property, equipment and software at cost

     32,086        42,878   

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

     (11,175     (12,968
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Property, equipment and software, net

     20,911        29,910   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Goodwill

     99,597        114,297   

Acquired curriculum and technology intangibles, net

     22,310        26,996   

Acquired publishing rights, net

     22,227        26,861   

Other intangible assets, net

     16,381        18,111   

Pre-publication costs, net

     10,956        10,034   

Restricted assets, less current portion

     7,399        11,082   

Other assets

     21,843        22,468   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 313,985      $ 369,680   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

Cambium Learning Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

     June 30,     December 31,  
     2012     2011  
     (unaudited)        
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY     

Current liabilities:

    

Current portion of capital lease obligations

   $ 1,255      $ 826   

Accounts payable

     4,478        3,024   

Contingent value rights, current

     1,717        —     

Accrued expenses

     22,422        21,203   

Deferred revenue, current

     31,814        38,984   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     61,686        64,037   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Long-term liabilities:

    

Long-term debt

     174,246        174,165   

Capital lease obligations, less current portion

     3,603        12,294   

Deferred revenue, less current portion

     4,698        4,304   

Contingent value rights, less current portion

     5,074        6,684   

Other liabilities

     17,241        18,126   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total long-term liabilities

     204,862        215,573   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (See Note 13)

    

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Preferred stock ($.001 par value, 15,000 shares authorized, zero shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011)

     —          —     

Common stock ($.001 par value, 150,000 shares authorized, 51,208 and 51,162 shares issued, and 49,124 and 49,518 shares outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively)

     51        51   

Capital surplus

     281,840        281,240   

Accumulated deficit

     (227,400     (184,659

Treasury stock at cost (2,084 and 1,644 shares at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively)

     (5,440     (4,931

Other comprehensive income (loss):

    

Pension and postretirement plans

     (1,615     (1,632

Net unrealized gain on securities

     1        1   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

     (1,614     (1,631
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

     47,437        90,070   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 313,985      $ 369,680   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements

 

5


Table of Contents

Cambium Learning Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

     Six Months Ended  
     June 30,     June 30,  
     2012     2011  
     (unaudited)  

Operating activities:

    

Net loss

   $ (42,741   $ (5,950

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization expense

     16,199        16,946   

Goodwill impairment

     14,700        —     

Loss (Gain) from recovery of property held for sale

     380        (2,727

Amortization of note discount and deferred financing costs

     869        639   

Impairment of long-lived assets

     3,111        —     

Change in fair value of contingent value rights obligation

     107        520   

Loss on disposal of assets

     66        —     

Stock-based compensation and expense

     205        604   

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

Accounts receivable, net

     (11,814     (4,210

Inventory

     801        (2,911

Other current assets

     71        146   

Other assets

     (163     625   

Restricted assets

     688        2,535   

Accounts payable

     1,454        (1,528

Accrued expenses

     1,219        2,500   

Deferred revenue

     (6,776     (5,975

Other long-term liabilities

     (444     (558
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

     (22,068     656   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Investing activities:

    

Cash paid for acquisitions

     —          (1,993

Expenditures for property, equipment, software and pre-publication costs

     (8,427     (6,718
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (8,427     (8,711
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financing activities:

    

Proceeds from debt

     —          174,024   

Repayment of debt

     —          (152,130

Deferred financing costs

     —          (7,980

Principal payments under capital lease obligations

     (584     (181

Borrowings under revolving credit agreement

     —          10,000   

Payment of revolving credit facility

     —          (10,000

Stock repurchases

     (509     (4,931
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

     (1,093     8,802   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     (31,588     747   

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

     63,191        11,831   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

   $ 31,603      $ 12,578   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

Cambium Learning Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 — Basis of Presentation

Presentation. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Cambium Learning Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) and are unaudited. The condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 has been derived from audited financial statements. All intercompany transactions are eliminated.

As permitted under the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) requirements for interim reporting, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted. The Company believes that these financial statements include all necessary and recurring adjustments for the fair presentation of the interim period results. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. Due to seasonality, the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Subsequent actual results may differ from those estimates.

Nature of Operations. The Company operates as three reportable business segments with separate management teams and infrastructures: Voyager Learning, a comprehensive intervention business; Sopris Learning, a supplemental solutions education business; and Cambium Learning Technologies, a technology-based education business.

Note 2 — Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are stated net of allowances for doubtful accounts and estimated sales returns. The allowance for doubtful accounts and estimated sales returns totaled $0.9 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on a review of the outstanding balances and historical collection experience. The reserve for sales returns is based on historical rates of return as well as other factors that in the Company’s judgment could reasonably be expected to cause sales returns to differ from historical experience.

Note 3 — Stock-Based Compensation and Expense

The total amount of pre-tax expense for stock-based compensation recognized in the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $(20) thousand, $0.3 million, $0.2 million, and $0.6 million, respectively. The decline in stock-based compensation in the second quarter of 2012 is primarily due to a decline in the fair value of outstanding warrants partially offset by expense recognized for other equity awards. The stock-based compensation expense recorded was allocated as follows:

 

(in thousands)    Three Months Ended June 30,      Six Months Ended June 30,  
     2012     2011      2012      2011  

Cost of revenues

   $ 13      $ 15       $ 25       $ 30   

Research and development expense

     30        33         60         65   

Sales and marketing expense

     26        40         56         78   

General and administrative expense

     (89     226         64         431   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ (20   $ 314       $ 205       $ 604   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

7


Table of Contents

On February 8, 2012, the Company granted 195,000 options under the Cambium Learning Group, Inc. 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) with a total grant date fair value, net of forecasted forfeitures, of $0.1 million. On April 16, 2012, the Company granted an additional 15,000 options under the Plan with a total grant date fair value, net of forecasted forfeitures, of $6 thousand. On May 14, 2012, the Company granted 25,000 options under the Plan with a total grant date fair value, net of forecasted forfeitures, of $5 thousand. These options have a per-share exercise price equal to $4.50 and vest equally over a four year service period. The term of the options is ten years from the date of grant. The following assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of these awards:

 

     2012     2011  

Expected stock volatility

     35.00     35.00

Risk-free interest rate

     1.02 -1.17     2.50

Expected years until exercise

     6.25        6.25   

Dividend yield

     0.00     0.00

Due to a lack of exercise history or other means to reasonably estimate future exercise behavior, the Company used the simplified method as described in applicable accounting guidance for stock-based compensation to estimate the expected years until exercise on new awards.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, 35,668 of the options granted on January 27, 2010, 3,901 of the options granted on February 1, 2011 and 10,000 of the options granted on August 11, 2011 were forfeited. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, 140,926 of the options granted on January 27, 2010, 16,140 of the options granted on February 1, 2011 and 10,000 of the options granted on August 11, 2011 were forfeited.

Restricted common stock awards of 46,295 shares were issued during the six months ended June 30, 2012, in connection with the Company’s Board of Directors compensation program. The restrictions on the common stock awards will lapse on the one-year anniversary of the grant date or upon a change in control of the Company. These awards were valued based on the Company’s closing stock price on the date of grant, February 8, 2012.

During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2012, the related restrictions lapsed on restricted common stock awards of 10,150 shares and 46,234 shares, respectively.

Note 4 — Net Income (Loss) per Common Share

Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, including the potential dilution that could occur if all of the Company’s outstanding stock awards that are in-the-money were exercised, using the treasury stock method. A reconciliation of the weighted-average number of common shares and equivalents outstanding used in the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share is shown in the table below for the periods indicated:

 

     Three Months Ended June 30,      Six Months Ended June 30,  
(Shares in thousands)    2012      2011      2012      2011  

Basic

     49,941         43,610         49,944         43,979   

Dilutive effect of awards

     —           821         —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Diluted

     49,941         44,431         49,944         43,979   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Antidilutive securities:

           

Options

     4,136         3,807         4,136         3,807   

Warrants

     188         —           188         141   

Restricted stock

     49         —           49         49   

Subscription rights

     —           —           —           6,645   

 

8


Table of Contents

Note 5 — Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability (exit price), in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques are based on observable or unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market assumptions. These two types of inputs have created the following fair value hierarchy:

 

   

Level 1 — Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

 

   

Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which significant value drivers are observable.

 

   

Level 3 — Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which significant value drivers are unobservable.

Applicable guidance requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

As of June 30, 2012, financial instruments include $31.6 million of cash and cash equivalents, restricted assets of $11.8 million, collateral investments of $2.0 million, $174.2 million of senior secured notes, $0.2 million of warrants, assets held for sale of $2.8 million, and $6.8 million in contingent value rights (“CVRs”). As of December 31, 2011, financial instruments include $63.2 million of cash and cash equivalents, restricted assets of $12.5 million, collateral investments of $2.0 million, $174.2 million of senior secured notes, $0.5 million of warrants, assets held for sale of $2.7 million, and $6.7 million in CVRs. The fair market values of cash equivalents and restricted assets are equal to their carrying value, as these investments are recorded based on quoted market prices and/or other market data for the same or comparable instruments and transactions as of the end of the reporting period. The fair values of the properties acquired by the Company as a result of its recovery efforts in connection with the employee embezzlement matter described in Note 16 were determined by an independent appraisal conducted by a licensed realtor based on the values of similar properties in the area. The fair values of the warehouse equipment held for sale in connection with the restructuring and reengineering initiative as described in Note 11was determined based on management’s best estimate of the net realizable value of these assets.

As of June 30, 2012, the fair value of the senior secured notes was $161.2 million based on quoted market prices in active markets for these debt instruments when traded as assets.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:

 

(in thousands)           Fair Value at Reporting Date Using         

Description

   As of June 30, 2012      Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets

(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
     Year-to-Date
Total Gains
(Losses)
 

Restricted Assets:

              

Money Market

   $ 11,787       $ 11,787       $ —         $ —         $ —     

Collateral Investments:

              

Money Market

     902         902         —           —           —     

Certificate of Deposit

     1,066         1,066         —           —           —     

Warrant

     177         —           177         —           395   

Assets held for sale:

              

Recovered Properties

     2,347         —           2,347         —           (380

Warehouse Equipment

     500         —           —           500         —     

CVRs

     6,791         —           —           6,791         (107

 

9


Table of Contents
(in thousands)           Fair Value at Reporting Date Using         

Description

   As of December 31, 2011      Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets

(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
     Year-to-Date
Total Gains
(Losses)
 

Restricted Assets:

              

Money Market

   $ 12,475       $ 12,475       $ —         $ —         $ —     

Collateral Investments:

              

Money Market

     902         902         —           —           —     

Certificate of Deposit

     1,065         1,065         —           —           —     

Warrant

     456         —           456         —           70   

Assets held for sale:

              

Recovered Properties

     2,727         —           2,727         —           —     

CVRs

     6,684         —           —           6,684         (1,308

The warrant was valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Due to the low exercise price of the warrants, the model assumptions do not significantly impact the valuation.

Goodwill Impairment

In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but are instead reviewed for impairment at least annually and if a triggering event is determined to have occurred in an interim period. The Company’s annual impairment testing is performed as of December 1 of each year. During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, significant sustained sales declines in the Company’s Kurzweil and IntelliTools product lines within the CLT segment (“KI”) caused the Company to re-evaluate the forecasts for this reporting unit. The Company determined that future sales for KI are not expected to achieve previous forecasts. This adverse change in expected future cash flows triggered the need for an interim goodwill impairment analysis for this reporting unit.

The applicable accounting guidance requires that a two-step impairment test be performed on goodwill. In the first step, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of that unit, goodwill is not impaired and no further testing is required. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of that unit, then a second step must be performed to determine the implied fair value of the reporting entity’s goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then an impairment loss equal to the difference is recorded.

Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in nature, and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions may include revenue growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic and market conditions, and determination of appropriate market comparables. In addition, the Company makes certain judgments and assumptions in allocating shared assets and liabilities to determine the carrying values of its reporting units.

In the first step of the impairment test performed on the KI reporting unit as of June 30, 2012, the fair market value of the reporting unit was determined using a weighted income and market approach. The income approach was dependent on multiple assumptions and estimates, including future cash flow projections with a terminal value multiple and the discount rate used to determine the expected present value of the estimated future cash flows. Future cash flow projections were based on management’s best estimates of economic and market conditions over the projected period, including industry fundamentals such as the state of educational funding, revenue growth rates, future costs and operating margins, working capital needs, capital and other expenditures, and tax rates. The discount rate applied to the future cash flows was a weighted-average cost of capital and took into consideration market and industry conditions, returns for comparable companies, the rate of return an outside investor would expect to earn, and other relevant factors. The fair value of the reporting unit also took into consideration a market approach, based on historical and projected multiples of certain guideline companies. The first step of impairment testing as of June 30, 2012 showed that the carrying value of the KI reporting unit exceeded its respective fair value and that the second step of testing was required.

The second step requires the allocation of the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. As a result of the second step of our interim impairment test, the goodwill balance for the KI reporting unit was determined to be partially impaired, and an impairment charge of $14.7 million was recorded as of June 30, 2012. The goodwill impairment charge was primarily the result of lowered forecasts of future sales.

 

10


Table of Contents

Although management has included its best estimates of the impact of these and other factors in our cash flow projections, the projection of future cash flows is inherently uncertain and requires a significant amount of judgment. Actual results that are significantly different than these cash flow projections or a change in the discount rate could significantly affect the fair value estimates used to value the reporting unit in step one of the goodwill analysis or the fair values of our other asset and liability balances used in step two of the goodwill analysis, and could result in future goodwill impairments.

Contingent Value Rights

The fair value of the liability for the CVRs is determined using a probability weighted cash flow analysis which takes into consideration the likelihood, amount and timing of cash flows of each element of the pool of assets and liabilities included in the CVR. The determination of fair value of the CVRs involves significant assumptions and estimates, which are reviewed at each quarterly reporting date. As of June 30, 2012, a fair value of $6.8 million has been recorded as a liability for the remaining CVR payments.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, a loss of $0.1 million was recorded in general and administrative expense to reflect an increase in the estimated fair value of the CVR liability. The ultimate value of the remaining CVR payments is not known at this time; however, it could range from zero to a maximum possible value of approximately $7.5 million. Future changes in the estimate of the fair value of the CVRs will impact results of operations and could be material.

The first and second CVR payment dates were in September 2010 and June 2011, with $1.1 million and $2.0 million, respectively, distributed to the escrow agent at those times for distribution to holders of the CVRs. The next scheduled distribution, if any, is expected to be paid in the second quarter of 2013, but no later than October 2013, and relates to a potential tax indemnity obligation. Additionally, as described in Note 13, any amounts due to CVR holders as a result of refunds received related to the Michigan tax payment will be distributed upon the final resolution of this agreed contingency.

A detail of the elements included in the CVR is as follows:

 

     Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)  
     CVRs  
     (In thousands)  
           Loss (Gain) for         
     Estimated Fair Value
as of December 31, 2011
    Changes in Estimated
CVR Liability
     Estimated Fair Value
as of June 30, 2012
 

Components of CVR Total:

       

Tax refunds received before closing of the merger

   $ 1,583      $ —         $ 1,583   

Other specified tax refunds

     4,797        —           4,797   

Tax indemnity obligation

     1,717        —           1,717   

Legal receivable

     2,400        —           2,400   

Michigan state tax liability

     (252     107         (145

Other specified tax related liabilities

     (53     —           (53

Costs incurred to collect tax refunds and by stockholders’ representative

     (409     —           (409
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Estimated total of CVR value

     9,783        107         9,890   

Payments to holders of CVRs

          3,099   
       

 

 

 

Remaining estimated CVR liability

        $ 6,791   
       

 

 

 

As of June 30, 2012, the remaining CVR liability of $6.8 million was comprised of $5.1 million related to the Michigan state tax agreed upon contingency and $1.7 million related to a potential tax indemnity obligation. Restricted assets in an escrow account for the benefit of the CVRs were $3.0 million for the potential tax indemnity obligation noted above, which, if such obligation is not triggered, will benefit the CVRs by $1.9 million with the remainder reverting back to general cash of the Company.

 

11


Table of Contents

Note 6 — Other Current Assets

Other current assets at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consisted of the following:

 

     As of  
     June 30,      December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011  

Prepaid expenses

   $ 2,402       $ 1,503   

Deferred costs

     2,262         2,714   

Other current assets

     —           518   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 4,664       $ 4,735   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Note 7 — Other Assets

Other assets at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consisted of the following:

 

     As of  
     June 30,      December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011  

Tax receivables

   $ 11,275       $ 11,039   

Deferred financing costs

     6,918         7,706   

Collateral investments

     1,968         1,967   

Other

     1,682         1,756   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 21,843       $ 22,468   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Tax receivables include the $11.3 million receivable from the state of Michigan as discussed in Note 13 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The deferred financing costs represent costs incurred in connection with the issuance of the $175 million aggregate principal amount of 9.75% senior secured notes as described in Note 14 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Note 8 — Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consisted of the following:

 

     As of  
     June 30,      December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011  

Salaries, bonuses and benefits

   $ 8,008       $ 7,688   

Accrued interest

     6,494         6,503   

Accrued royalties

     1,993         1,689   

Pension and post-retirement medical benefits

     1,222         1,221   

Other

     4,705         4,102   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 22,422       $ 21,203   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Accrued interest primarily relates to our 9.75% senior secured notes. The notes require semi-annual interest payments in arrears on each February 15 and August 15 over the life of the notes.

 

12


Table of Contents

Note 9 — Other Liabilities

Other liabilities at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consisted of the following:

 

     As of  
     June 30,      December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011  

Pension and post-retirement medical benefits, long-term portion

   $ 10,760       $ 11,110   

Long-term deferred tax liability

     3,092         3,121   

Deferred rent

     1,739         1,931   

Long-term income tax payable

     828         803   

Long-term deferred compensation

     495         544   

Other

     327         617   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 17,241       $ 18,126   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Note 10 — Pension Plan

The net pension costs of the Company’s defined benefit pension plan were comprised solely of interest costs and totaled $0.1 million for the three month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and $0.3 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. The net pension costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, also included accumulated net loss amortization of $9 thousand and $17 thousand, respectively.

Note 11 — Restructuring

In late 2011, the Company launched a reengineering and restructuring initiative to align its organizational and cost structure to its strategic goals. The financial goal of these actions is to provide savings to both improve earnings and to fund re-investment in growth areas of the business. The majority of these costs are expected to be incurred by the end of 2012. Reengineering and restructuring activities will be assessed and enacted throughout 2012 and are expected to include:

 

   

Obtaining new leadership and employee skill sets that support the transformation of the Company to focus more heavily on technology solutions and services and other strategic objectives;

 

   

Outsourcing warehouse operations to a third party logistics provider, which will allow the Company to take advantage of a lower and more variable cost structure for its print based products, as well as locate operations closer to the geographic center of its nationwide customer base;

 

   

Rationalizing facilities space by consolidating facilities and subleasing entire or partial facilities where feasible;

 

   

Assessing and implementing projects to improve cost efficiencies and enhance the customer experience throughout the order to cash, service delivery, and procurement processes;

 

   

Reduction of job positions that do not support the Company’s key strategic goals; and

 

   

Other reductions as needed to improve the Company’s cost structure.

 

13


Table of Contents

The total expense for all reengineering and restructuring initiatives from the fourth quarter of 2011 through the end of 2012 is expected to be approximately $7.5 million, including both cash and non-cash items, and capital expenditures are expected to be between $0.6 and $0.7 million. The following table summarizes the amounts incurred and expected to be incurred in connection with the reengineering and restructuring initiative:

 

(in thousands)    Total Amount
Expected to be
Incurred
     Total Incurred as
of June 30, 2012
     Incurred in Six Months
Ended June 30, 2012
     Incurred in Year Ended
December 31, 2011
 

One-time termination benefits

   $ 2,927       $ 2,777       $ 1,588       $ 1,189   

Impairment of long-lived assets

     3,111         3,111         3,111         —     

Warehouse transition costs

     959         959         959         —     

Facility rationalization costs

     378         18         18         —     

Process reengineering costs

     150         73         73         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 7,525       $ 6,938       $ 5,749       $ 1,189   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The change in the reengineering and restructuring accrual for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is as follows:

 

(in thousands)    One-time
Termination
Benefits
    Warehouse
Outsourcing
Costs
    Facility
Rationalization
Costs
    Process
Reengineering
Costs
 

Balance as of December 31, 2011

   $ 1,133      $ —        $ —        $ —     

Accrual changes

     1,588        959        18        73   

Payments made

     (1,240     (806     (7     (72
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of June 30, 2012

   $ 1,481      $ 153      $ 11      $ 1   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The reengineering and restructuring charges are recorded in unallocated shared services.

Assets held for sale in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets include warehouse equipment of $0.5 million related to this initiative. The fair values of these assets are based on management’s best estimate of the net realizable value of the equipment.

The estimates of future reengineering and restructuring charges and the calculated impairment of long lived assets represent expectations or beliefs concerning various future events. These expectations involve a number of risks and uncertainties including potential changes to the time and cost required to sublease facility space, the ultimate sublease rentals received for the facility space, the time and cost necessary to transfer to the services of the third party logistics provider, and whether, when and how successfully the Company enacts other actions that could favorably impact its cost structure. In the event these assumptions change in the future the Company could be required to record additional impairment of long lived assets or incur additional costs to complete the initiative.

 

14


Table of Contents

Note 12 — Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company recognizes the financial statement impacts of a tax return position when it is more likely than not, based on technical merits, that the position will ultimately be sustained. For tax positions that meet this recognition threshold, the Company applies judgment, taking into account applicable tax laws, experience managing tax audits and relevant GAAP, to determine the amount of tax benefits to recognize in its financial statements. For each position, the difference between the benefit realized on the Company’s tax return and the benefit reflected in its financial statements is recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as an unrecognized tax benefit (“UTB”). The Company updates its UTBs at each financial statement date to reflect the impacts of audit settlements and other resolution of audit issues, expiration of statutes of limitation, developments in tax law and ongoing discussions with tax authorities. The balance of UTBs was $7.1 million at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. All U.S. tax years prior to 2008 related to acquired entities in a 2009 merger have been audited by the Internal Revenue Service. VSS-Cambium Holdings II Corp. and its subsidiaries have been examined by the Internal Revenue Service through the end of 2006. Various state tax authorities are in the process of examining income tax returns for various tax years through 2007.

Note 13 — Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings incidental to its business. Management believes that the outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s consolidated operations or financial condition and the Company has recognized appropriate liabilities as necessary based on facts and circumstances known to management. The Company expenses legal costs related to legal contingencies as incurred.

The Company had a potential contingent liability related to state income taxes and related interest that had been assessed against a former subsidiary. On August 27, 2010, the former subsidiary received a decision and order of determination from the Michigan taxing authority. According to the determination of the Michigan taxing authority, the former subsidiary was liable to the State of Michigan for unpaid taxes and interest in the amount of approximately $10.4 million. In order to expedite resolution of this matter and access the Michigan Court of Claims, the Company paid this liability to the state of Michigan on behalf of the former subsidiary on September 7, 2010 and filed an action in the Michigan Court of Claims to pursue a refund of the assessment. On November 16, 2011, the Court of Claims in Michigan ruled in favor of the Company’s motion for summary judgment. The Michigan state taxing authority has since appealed the decision of the Court of Claims to the Michigan Court of Appeals.

As management believes it is more likely than not that the Company’s position will ultimately be upheld, a tax receivable for the expected refund plus statutory interest is recorded in other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets totaling $11.3 million and $11.0 million as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

This liability was identified as an agreed contingency for purposes of the CVRs issued as part of a 2009 merger. In accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, dated June 20, 2009, fifty percent (50%) of any amount that is paid or due and payable with respect to each agreed contingency would offset payments due under the CVRs from an amount held for such payments by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as escrow agent, in an escrow account. Upon payment of the approximately $10.4 million, the Company requested a disbursement to the Company from the escrow account in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the payment, or approximately $5.2 million. This cash disbursement was received by the Company during the third quarter of 2010. On September 20, 2010, the Company amended the merger agreement and the escrow agreement to extend the term of the escrow agreement until the later of the full distribution of the escrow funds or the final resolution of the agreed contingency. The final resolution of the tax litigation or potential settlement could result in a total refund from the taxing authority to the Company ranging from zero to approximately $11.3 million as of June 30, 2012, and 50% of any such refund would in turn be payable to the holders of the CVRs. As of June 30, 2012, the Company has recorded $5.1 million as a component of the CVR liability related to this agreed upon contingency, which is an estimate of the fair value based on a probability-weighted cash flow analysis using management assumptions related to the likelihood of the ultimate cash outflows. If the former subsidiary’s position is not ultimately upheld, the Company could incur non-cash charges of up to $10.4 million of indemnification expense and a $0.9 million reduction in interest income in future periods on its Condensed Statements of Operations, partially offset by the related $5.1 million reduction to the CVRs liability.

The Court of Claims in Michigan also ruled in the Company’s favor on two other tax matters that could result in a refund of up to $0.8 million, plus statutory interest. These potential tax refunds would be retained by the Company and are not subject to payment to the holders of the CVRs.

From time to time, the Company may enter into firm purchase commitments for printed materials included in inventory which the Company expects to use in the ordinary course of business. These commitments are typically for terms less than one year and require the Company to buy minimum quantities of materials with specific delivery dates at a fixed price over the term. As of June 30, 2012, these open purchase commitments totaled $1.1 million.

 

15


Table of Contents

The Company has letters of credit outstanding as of June 30, 2012 in the amount of $2.9 million to support workers’ compensation insurance coverage, certain credit card programs, the build-to-suit lease, and performance bonds for certain contracts. The Company maintains a $1.1 million certificate of deposit as collateral for the workers’ compensation insurance and credit card program letters of credit and for Automated Clearinghouse (ACH) programs. The Company also maintains a $0.9 million money market fund investment as collateral for a travel card program. The certificate of deposit and money market fund investment are recorded in other assets.

Note 14 — Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

 

     June 30,     December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012     2011  

$175.0 million of 9.75% senior secured notes due February 15, 2017, interest payable semiannually

   $ 175,000      $ 175,000   

Less: Unamortized discount

     (754     (835
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total long-term debt

   $ 174,246      $ 174,165   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

In February 2011, the Company closed an offering of $175 million aggregate principal amount of 9.75% senior secured notes due 2017 (the “Notes”) and entered into an asset-based revolving credit facility with potential for up to $40 million in borrowing capacity. Deferred financing costs are capitalized in other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, net of accumulated amortization, and are to be amortized over the term of the related debt using the effective interest method. Unamortized capitalized deferred financing costs at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were $6.9 million and $7.7 million, respectively.

Interest on the Notes will accrue at a rate of 9.75% per annum from the date of original issuance and will be payable semi-annually in arrears on each February 15 and August 15, to the holders of record of the Notes on the immediately preceding February 1 and August 1. No principal repayments are due until the maturity date of the Notes.

The Notes are secured by (i) a first priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s assets (other than inventory and accounts receivable and related assets of the ABL Credit Parties in connection with the ABL Facility (each as defined and discussed below) and subject to certain exceptions), including capital stock of the guarantors (which are certain of the Company’s subsidiaries), and (ii) a second-priority lien on substantially all of the inventory and accounts receivable and related assets of the ABL Credit Parties, in each case, subject to certain permitted liens. The Notes also contain customary covenants, including limitations on the Company’s ability to incur debt, and events of default as defined by the agreement. The Company may, at its option, redeem the Notes prior to their maturity based on the terms included in the agreement.

ABL Facility. In February 2011, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Cambium Learning, Inc. (together with its wholly owned subsidiaries, the “ABL Credit Parties”), entered into a credit facility (the “ABL Facility”) pursuant to a Loan and Security Agreement (the “ABL Loan Agreement”), by and among the ABL Credit Parties, Harris N.A., individually and as Agent (the “Agent”) for any ABL Lender (as hereinafter defined) which is or becomes a party to said ABL Loan Agreement, certain other lenders party thereto (together with Harris N.A. in its capacity as a lender, the “ABL Lenders”), Barclays Bank PLC, individually and as Collateral Agent, and BMO Capital Markets and Barclays Capital, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Runners. The ABL Facility consists of a four-year $40.0 million revolving credit facility, which includes a $5.0 million subfacility for swing line loans and a $5.0 million subfacility for letters of credit. In addition, the ABL Facility provides that the ABL Credit Parties may increase the aggregate principal amount of the ABL Facility by up to an additional $20.0 million, subject to the consent of the Agent (whose consent shall not be unreasonably withheld) and subject to the satisfaction of certain other conditions.

The interest rate for the ABL Facility will be, at the ABL Credit Parties’ option, either an amount to be determined (ranging from 2.75% to 3.25%, depending upon the ABL Credit Parties’ fixed charge coverage ratio at the time) above the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or at an amount to be determined (ranging from 1.75% to 2.25%, depending upon the ABL Credit Parties’ fixed charge coverage ratio at the time) above the “base rate.” On any day, the base rate will be the greatest of (i) the Agent’s then-effective prime commercial rate, (ii) an average federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) the LIBOR quoted rate plus 1.00%. The ABL Facility is, subject to certain exceptions, secured by a first-priority lien on the ABL Credit Parties’ inventory and accounts receivable and related assets and a second-priority lien (junior to the lien securing the ABL Credit Parties’ obligations with respect to the Notes) on substantially all of the ABL Credit Parties’ other assets.

As of June 30, 2012, the balances of accounts receivable and inventory collateralizing the ABL Facility were $25.3 million and $20.8 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had a borrowing base under the ABL Loan Agreement of up to $31.4 million.

 

16


Table of Contents

Revolving loans under the ABL Facility may be used solely for (i) the satisfaction of existing indebtedness of the ABL Credit Parties under their prior senior secured credit facility and outstanding pursuant to their prior existing senior unsecured notes, (ii) general operating capital needs of the ABL Credit Parties in a manner consistent with the provisions of the ABL Facility and all applicable laws, (iii) working capital and other general corporate purposes in a manner consistent with the provisions of the ABL Facility and all applicable laws, (iv) the payment of certain fees and expenses incurred in connection with the ABL Facility and/or the Notes, and (v) other purposes permitted under the ABL Loan Agreement.

The ABL Facility contains a financial covenant that generally requires the ABL Credit Parties to maintain, on a consolidated basis, either (i) excess availability of at least the greater of $8 million and 15% of the revolver commitment or (ii) a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.1 to 1.0. The ABL Credit Parties will be required to pay, quarterly in arrears, an unused line fee equal to the product of (x) either 0.375% or 0.50% (depending upon the ABL Credit Parties’ fixed charge coverage ratio at the time) and (y) the average daily unused amount of the revolver. As of June 30, 2012, we were in compliance with this covenant.

Note 15 — Segment Reporting

The Company has three reportable segments with separate management teams and infrastructures that offer various products and services, as follows:

Voyager Learning:

Voyager Learning offers systemic solutions in reading, math, and services including turnaround and online courseware targeted towards the at-risk and special education student populations. Voyager Learning provides strategic and intensive comprehensive interventions that are adaptive to the needs of diverse populations. Voyager Learning’s research-based instructional materials, support services and educational technology help accelerate struggling students to grade-level proficiency, with the goal to increase graduation rates.

Sopris Learning:

Sopris Learning supplemental products focus on the full spectrum of academic support utilizing print and technology based supplemental solutions—including assessments, literacy and mathematics interventions, positive behavior supports, and professional development. Whether implemented in a single classroom, school-wide, or district-wide, Sopris Learning supplements have been proven to strengthen core instruction and to quickly and positively impact the academic achievement of students in all key areas of instruction. When compared to products offered by the Company’s other business units, Sopris Learning products tend to be more tightly tailored to specific skills and target a smaller, more specific audience.

Cambium Learning Technologies:

Cambium Learning Technologies utilizes technology to deliver subscription-based websites, online libraries, software and equipment designed to help students reach their potential in grades K through 12 and beyond. Cambium Learning Technologies products are offered under four different industry leading brands: Learning A-Z, ExploreLearning, Kurzweil Educational Systems and IntelliTools.

Other:

This consists of unallocated shared services, such as accounting, legal, human resources and corporate related items. Depreciation and amortization expense, goodwill impairment, interest income and expense, other income and expense, and income taxes are also included in other, as the Company and its chief operating decision maker evaluate the performance of operating segments excluding these captions.

 

17


Table of Contents

The following table represents the revenue, operating expenses and income (loss) from operations which are used by the Company’s chief operating decision maker to measure the segment’s operating performance. The Company does not track assets directly by segment and the chief operating decision maker does not use assets or capital expenditures to measure a segment’s operating performance, and therefore this information is not presented.

 

     Voyager
Learning
     Sopris
Learning
     Cambium
Learning
Technologies
     Other     Consolidated  

Quarter Ended June 30, 2012

             

Net revenues

   $ 21,222       $ 6,647       $ 12,560       $ —        $ 40,429   

Cost of revenues

     10,025         2,344         1,165         863        14,397   

Amortization

     —           —           —           6,579        6,579   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total cost of revenues

     10,025         2,344         1,165         7,442        20,976   

Other operating expenses

     8,074         2,019         6,217         4,398        20,708   

Goodwill impairment

     —           —           —           14,700        14,700   

Embezzlement and related expense (recoveries)

     —           —           —           44        44   

Depreciation and amortization

     —           —           —           1,591        1,591   

Impairment of long-lived assets

     —           —           —           320        320   

Net interest expense

     —           —           —           4,627        4,627   

Other income, net

     —           —           —           (37     (37

Income tax benefit

     —           —           —           (23     (23
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Segment net income (loss)

   $ 3,123       $ 2,284       $ 5,178       $ (33,062   $ (22,477
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Quarter Ended June 30, 2011

             

Net revenues

   $ 35,254       $ 8,370       $ 13,567       $ —        $ 57,191   

Cost of revenues

     13,947         2,568         1,232         72        17,819   

Amortization

     —           —           —           6,844        6,844   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total cost of revenues

     13,947         2,568         1,232         6,916        24,663   

Other operating expenses

     9,227         2,594         5,811         4,103        21,735   

Embezzlement and related expense (recoveries)

     —           —           —           40        40   

Depreciation and amortization

     —           —           —           1,748        1,748   

Net interest expense

     —           —           —           4,882        4,882   

Other income, net

     —           —           —           (2     (2

Income tax expense

     —           —           —           318        318   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Segment net income (loss)

   $ 12,080       $ 3,208       $ 6,524       $ (18,005   $ 3,807   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

18


Table of Contents
     Voyager
Learning
    Sopris
Learning
     Cambium
Learning
Technologies
     Other     Consolidated  

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

            

Net revenues

   $ 33,258      $ 9,859       $ 25,167       $ —        $ 68,284   

Cost of revenues

     17,976        3,660         2,497         1,430        25,563   

Amortization

     —          —           —           12,949        12,949   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total cost of revenues

     17,976        3,660         2,497         14,379        38,512   

Other operating expenses

     16,106        4,063         12,915         8,924        42,008   

Goodwill impairment

     —          —           —           14,700        14,700   

Embezzlement and related expense (recoveries)

     —          —           —           (41     (41

Depreciation and amortization

     —          —           —           3,250        3,250   

Impairment of long-lived assets

     —          —           —           3,111        3,111   

Net interest expense

     —          —           —           9,404        9,404   

Other income, net

     —          —           —           (73     (73

Income tax expense

     —          —           —           154        154   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Segment net income (loss)

   $ (824   $ 2,136       $ 9,755       $ (53,808   $ (42,741
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

            

Net revenues

   $ 49,946      $ 12,555       $ 25,385       $ —        $ 87,886   

Cost of revenues

     21,940        4,238         2,455         153        28,786   

Amortization

     —          —           —           13,462        13,462   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total cost of revenues

     21,940        4,238         2,455         13,615        42,248   

Other operating expenses

     16,820        4,910         10,972         8,461        41,163   

Embezzlement and related expense (recoveries)

     —          —           —           (2,396     (2,396

Depreciation and amortization

     —          —           —           3,484        3,484   

Net interest expense

     —          —           —           9,287        9,287   

Other income, net

     —          —           —           (365     (365

Income tax expense

     —          —           —           415        415   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Segment net income (loss)

   $ 11,186      $ 3,407       $ 11,958       $ (32,501   $ (5,950
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note 16 — Embezzlement

On April 26, 2008, the Company began an internal investigation that revealed irregularities over the control and use of cash and certain other general ledger accounts of the Company, revealing a misappropriation of assets. These irregularities were perpetrated by a former employee over more than a three-year period beginning in 2004 and continuing through April 2008 and the losses incurred by the Company totaled $14.0 million. Charges included in the condensed consolidated statement of operations after April 2008 represent expenses incurred by the Company to recover property purchased by the former employee using the embezzled funds, net of any recoveries.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the net recoveries represented changes in the estimated fair value of the warrants expected to be issued upon the sale of recovered properties, partially offset by a reduction in the fair value of the recovered properties and related expenses. The Company deemed the reduction in the far value of the Assets held for sale appropriate based on a revised market analysis of similar properties in the area. Warrants to purchase 36,733 shares of the Company’s stock were issued to VSS-Cambium Holdings III, LLC as a result of the cash recoveries during the first six months of the year. Upon the sale of the recovered properties the Company will be required to issue additional warrants based on the amount of cash received, net of related expenses. The number of warrants to be issued will equal 0.45 multiplied by the quotient of the net cash recovery divided by $6.50. The Company will be obligated to issue these warrants upon the cash realization of the related recoveries; therefore an estimated liability of $0.2 million has been recorded as Embezzlement and related expense (recoveries) in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and Accrued expenses in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

 

19


Table of Contents

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company received cash recoveries of $0.5 million and title to two properties purchased by the former employee with embezzled funds that had an appraised fair value of approximately $2.6 million, net of estimated selling costs. These recoveries were recorded as reductions to Embezzlement and related expense (recoveries) in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and the properties were recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as Assets Held for Sale. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, a majority of the costs to prepare the properties for listing were incurred which resulted in an increase in the value of the Assets Held for Sale in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as the remaining costs to sell are now comprised solely of real estate agent commissions.

Ongoing expenses incurred related to the Company’s recovery efforts totaled $0.1 million during the first half of 2011.

Note 17 — Stock Repurchases

As previously announced, the Company’s board of directors authorized a $5 million share repurchase program through July 5, 2013. On June 22, 2012, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with an investor pursuant to its share repurchase program. The transaction was settled on June 27, 2012 with the Company purchasing 440,373 shares for a total cost of $0.5 million. The purchase price was set at the 10 day volume-weighted average price on the date of the stock purchase agreement. Upon repurchase these treasury shares are no longer registered under the Securities Act of 1933.

On June 28, 2012, the Company adopted a Rule 10b5-1 plan (the “Plan”) with Robert W. Baird & Company, Inc. under which the Company may repurchase its shares at times when the Company might otherwise be precluded from doing so under insider trading laws. This Plan has been established pursuant to, and as part of, the Company’s share repurchase program. The timing and extent of the repurchases under the Rule 10b5-1 plan are subject to Securities and Exchange Commission regulations as well as certain price, market volume and timing constraints specified in the plan. The Company began repurchasing shares under the terms of the Plan on July 5, 2012. Shares repurchased under the Plan through July 31, 2012 totaled 126,426 shares.

Note 18 — Subsidiary Guarantor Financial Statements

The following tables present condensed consolidated financial information as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 for: (a) the Company without its consolidated subsidiaries (the “Parent Company”); (b) on a combined basis, the guarantors of the Notes, which include Cambium Learning, Inc., Cambium Education, Inc., LAZEL, Inc., and Kurzweil/IntelliTools, Inc. (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”); and (c) Voyager Learning Company (the “Non-Guarantor Subsidiary”). Separate financial statements of the Subsidiary Guarantors are not presented because the guarantors are unconditionally, jointly, and severally liable under the guarantees, and the Company believes such separate statements or disclosures would not be useful to investors.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2012

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

 

     Parent
Company
    Subsidiary
Guarantors
    Non-Guarantor
Subsidiary
    Eliminations      Consolidated  

Net revenues

   $ —        $ 40,429      $ —        $ —         $ 40,429   

Total costs and expenses

     (314     58,475        178        —           58,339   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income (loss) before interest, other income and income taxes

     314        (18,046     (178     —           (17,910

Net interest income (expense)

     (4,650     26        (3     —           (4,627

Other income, net

     —          37        —          —           37   

Income tax benefit

     —          23        —          —           23   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net loss

   $ (4,336   $ (17,960   $ (181   $ —         $ (22,477
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

20


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2011

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

 

     Parent
Company
    Subsidiary
Guarantors
    Non-Guarantor
Subsidiary
    Eliminations      Consolidated  

Net revenues

   $ —        $ 57,191      $ —        $ —         $ 57,191   

Total costs and expenses

     795        47,025        366        —           48,186   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income (loss) before interest, other income and income taxes

     (795     10,166        (366     —           9,005   

Net interest expense

     (4,639     (234     (9     —           (4,882

Other income, net

     —          2        —          —           2   

Income tax expense

     —          (318     —          —           (318
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss)

   $ (5,434   $ 9,616      $ (375   $ —         $ 3,807   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

 

     Parent
Company
    Subsidiary
Guarantors
    Non-Guarantor
Subsidiary
    Eliminations      Consolidated  

Net revenues

   $ —        $ 68,284      $ —        $ —         $ 68,284   

Total costs and expenses

     196        100,985        359        —           101,540   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loss before interest, other income and income taxes

     (196     (32,701     (359     —           (33,256

Net interest expense

     (9,300     (97     (7     —           (9,404

Other income, net

     —          73        —          —           73   

Income tax expense

     —          (154     —          —           (154
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net loss

   $ (9,496   $ (32,879   $ (366   $ —         $ (42,741
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

 

     Parent
Company
    Subsidiary
Guarantors
    Non-Guarantor
Subsidiary
    Eliminations      Consolidated  

Net revenues

   $ —        $ 87,886      $ —        $ —         $ 87,886   

Total costs and expenses

     1,798        82,024        677        —           84,499   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income (loss) before interest, other income and income taxes

     (1,798     5,862        (677     —           3,387   

Net interest expense

     (6,830     (2,566     109        —           (9,287

Other income, net

     —          365        —          —           365   

Income tax expense

     —          (415     —          —           (415
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss)

   $ (8,628   $ 3,246      $ (568   $ —         $ (5,950
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

21


Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

As of June 30, 2012

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

 

     Parent
Company
     Subsidiary
Guarantors
     Non-Guarantor
Subsidiary
    Eliminations     Consolidated  

Investment in subsidiaries

   $ 252,333       $ —         $ —        $ (252,333   $ —     

Other assets

     212,589         310,258         20,083        (228,945     313,985   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 464,922       $ 310,258       $ 20,083      $ (481,278   $ 313,985   

Total liabilities

   $ 217,978       $ 256,726       $ 20,789      $ (228,945   $ 266,548   

Total stockholders’ equity

     246,944         53,532         (706     (252,333     47,437   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 464,922       $ 310,258       $ 20,083      $ (481,278   $ 313,985   

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

As of December 31, 2011

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

 

     Parent
Company
     Subsidiary
Guarantors
     Non-Guarantor
Subsidiary
    Eliminations     Consolidated  

Investment in subsidiaries

   $ 252,333       $ —         $ —        $ (252,333   $ —     

Other assets

     214,311         355,628         20,535        (220,794     369,680   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 466,644       $ 355,628       $ 20,535      $ (473,127   $ 369,680   

Total liabilities

   $ 210,295       $ 269,217       $ 20,892      $ (220,794   $ 279,610   

Total stockholders’ equity

     256,349         86,411         (357     (252,333     90,070   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 466,644       $ 355,628       $ 20,535      $ (473,127   $ 369,680   

Condensed Statement of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

 

     Parent
Company
    Subsidiary
Guarantors
    Non-Guarantor
Subsidiary
     Eliminations      Consolidated  

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

   $ 509      $ (22,577   $ —         $ —         $ (22,068

Net cash used in investing activities

     —          (8,427     —           —           (8,427

Net cash used in financing activities

     (509     (584     —           —           (1,093

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

     —          (31,588     —           —           (31,588

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

     5,288        57,903        —           —           63,191   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

   $ 5,288      $ 26,315      $ —         $ —         $ 31,603   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

22


Table of Contents

Condensed Statement of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

 

     Parent
Company
    Subsidiary
Guarantors
    Non-Guarantor
Subsidiary
     Eliminations      Consolidated  

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

   $ (159,690   $ 160,346      $ —         $ —         $ 656   

Net cash used in investing activities

     (1,993     (6,718     —           —           (8,711

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

     161,752        (152,950     —           —           8,802   

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

     69        678        —           —           747   

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

     5,219        6,612        —           —           11,831   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

   $ 5,288      $ 7,290      $ —         $ —         $ 12,578   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

23


Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This section should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Cambium Learning Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements.

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws that involve risks and uncertainties, and which are based on beliefs, expectations, estimates, projections, forecasts, plans, anticipations, targets, outlooks, initiatives, visions, objectives, strategies, opportunities, drivers and intents of our management. Such statements are made in reliance upon the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this report, including statements regarding our future financial position, economic performance and results of operations, as well as our business strategy, objectives of management for future operations, and the information set forth under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” are forward-looking statements.

Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by, among other things, the use of forward-looking language, such as “believes,” “expects,” “estimates,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “targets,” “outlooks,” “initiatives,” “visions,” “objectives,” “strategies,” “opportunities,” “drivers,” “intends,” “scheduled to,” “seeks,” “may,” “will,” or “should,” or the negative of those terms, or other variations of those terms or comparable language, or by discussions of strategy, plans, targets, models or intentions. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and except for our ongoing obligations under the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Accordingly, you are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable as of the date made, expectations may prove to have been materially different from the results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, as it is impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could affect our actual results. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described in “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A and elsewhere in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the SEC. Unless otherwise required by law, we also disclaim any obligation to update our view of any such risks or uncertainties or to announce publicly the results of any revisions to the forward-looking statements made in this report.

Our Company

We are one of the largest providers of proprietary intervention curricula, educational technologies, professional services and other research-based education solutions for students in the Pre-K through 12th grade education market in the United States. The intervention market, where we focus, provides supplemental education solutions to at-risk and special education students. We offer a distinctive, blended intervention solution that combines different forms of instruction techniques, including textbooks, education games, data management, teacher training and student centric e-learning solutions. We believe that our approach builds a more comprehensive and effective instructional model that combines teacher-led instruction and student directed technology and that this approach sets us apart from our competitors and yields better student outcomes for at-risk students.

Our mission is to deliver educational solutions, primarily focused on reading and math, which enable the most challenged learners to reach grade level academic standards. We take a holistic approach to learning and our intervention solutions address both the behavioral and cognitive needs of the students we serve. We believe our specific focus on the Pre-K through 12th grade intervention market compared to those companies focused primarily on the core education market gives us a competitive edge relative to our peers. Further, our products and services are highly results-oriented and enable school districts across the country to improve student performance and better satisfy rigorous accountability standards.

Our research-based intervention programs have demonstrated consistent success with at-risk and special education student populations and have established us as one of the most readily recognized companies focused on serving this market. We operate in three reportable business segments: Voyager Learning, a comprehensive intervention business; Sopris Learning, a supplemental solutions education business; and Cambium Learning Technologies (“CLT”), a technology-based education business.

Unallocated shared services, such as accounting, legal, human resources and corporate related items, are recorded in a “Shared Services” category. Depreciation and amortization expense, goodwill impairment, interest income and expense, other income and expense, and taxes are included in this category.

 

24


Table of Contents

Overview

Our customers fund their operations with state and local funding which is primarily determined by sales and property taxes. However, programs and funding sources used to procure our products draw both from federal funding sources and state and local sources. Regardless of the source of the funds used by our customers, funding levels in general have a direct impact on our customer’s ability to purchase our products. The primary federal funding programs used by customers for our products are Title 1 and IDEA. Both of these funding programs have consistently risen over the long term since their inception. In 2010 and 2011, these two key funding sources received a substantial boost from the ARRA stimulus program. These ARRA funds expired on September 1, 2011.

We expect declines in overall available funding for 2012 compared to 2011 due to continued strain on state budgets and the expiration of ARRA without a corresponding increase in any other major funding source. Based on the most recently submitted federal budgets, federal funding for Title 1 and IDEA, without the ARRA funds, were proposed at substantially the same level as 2011. Race to the Top, President Obama’s signature school reform program, has requested $850 million under the budget proposal. A large portion of that sum would go to early learning and focus on helping states and local districts support reforms and innovations to close achievement gaps and increase student achievement. At the state and local funding level we expect challenges similar to 2011 as states continue to face fiscal challenges and constraints. However, trends emerging from state governors’ reports indicate fewer and more modest anticipated declines in K-12 education funding versus cuts in 2010 and 2011.

In light of the funding environment, as expected, the first half of 2012 proved challenging in replicating the order volume achieved in the first half of 2011 when ARRA funding was still in place. We saw order volume declination in each of our three operating segments; however, we did see improvement in our Learning A-Z product line within the CLT segment and our service offerings within the Voyager Learning segment led by our school turnaround product line. During the first half of 2012, we were selected as the school turnaround provider for three schools in Providence, RI and 15 schools in Indianapolis, IN. These pockets of growth are promising, but have been insufficient in offsetting the declines in overall product sales.

While the funding environment continues to pose challenges, we are optimistic that the efficacy of our solutions, the need for our products in the education market, and our product diversification will strengthen our ability to sustain market share in a troubled market and, further, capture market share as the market recovers.

Management will invest in the following activities to encourage revenue growth in the second half of 2012:

 

   

We will continue to focus on sales force effectiveness to increase our success rate in closing significant opportunities.

 

   

All segments will continue investments in the development and sales and marketing of online and technology enabled solutions.

 

   

Voyager Learning will continue to expand its service offerings with particular focus on school turnaround solutions.

 

   

We have launched and will continue to invest in initiatives to gain traction in the e-commerce marketplace.

To build a platform for long-term revenue growth we will focus on the following:

 

   

We will invest in product development, particularly on technology enabled and online solutions. We expect the technology solutions to focus especially on student-directed learning as well as mastery-based or competency-based solutions.

 

   

We will optimize our sales force using our Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system and other tools to enhance and sustain productivity and increase overall channels to market.

 

   

We will continue our strategy to achieve growth through selective acquisitions, and in particular we will target technology-centric, adaptive, student-directed offerings. Execution of this strategy is likely to occur in fiscal year 2013 and beyond.

 

   

Additional investments in online and e-marketing will increase the productivity of our sales, marketing and advertising efforts across all business segments.

In order to align our organization to our strategic goals and to provide savings as a means to fund the initiatives listed above, we have embarked on a series of reengineering and restructuring initiatives. The majority of the costs for these initiatives are expected to be incurred by the end of 2012 and the cost savings benefits will begin in 2012 and will provide their full benefit in 2013. Reengineering and restructuring activities are expected to include:

 

   

Obtaining new leadership and employee skill sets that support our transformation to focus more heavily on technology solutions and services and other strategic objectives;

 

25


Table of Contents
   

Outsourcing warehouse operations to a third party logistics provider, which will allow us to take advantage of a lower and more variable cost structure for our print based products, as well as locate operations closer to the geographic center of our nationwide customer base;

 

   

Rationalizing facilities space by consolidating facilities and subleasing entire or partial facilities where feasible;

 

   

Assessing and implementing projects to improve cost efficiencies and enhance the customer experience throughout the order to cash, service delivery, and procurement processes;

 

   

Reduction of job positions that do not support the Company’s key strategic goals; and

 

   

Other reductions as needed to improve our cost structure.

The total expense for all reengineering and restructuring initiatives from the fourth quarter of 2011 through the end of 2012 is expected to be approximately $7.5 million, including both cash and non-cash items, and capital expenditures are expected to be between $0.6 and $0.7 million. The annual cost savings expected to be realized from all reengineering and restructuring activities is now $6.0 million in 2012 and the actions taken so far are estimated to yield 2013 savings of $11.0 million. The Company further expects to continue on this path to ultimately secure annualized savings of $15.0 million, a part of which is intended to be reinvested in critical growth areas.

 

26


Table of Contents

Second Quarter of Fiscal 2012 Compared to the Second Quarter of Fiscal 2011

 

(in thousands)    Quarter Ended     Year Over Year Change  
     June 30, 2012     June 30, 2011     Favorable/(Unfavorable)  
     Amount     % of
Revenues
    Amount     % of
Revenues
    $     %  

Net revenues:

            

Voyager Learning

   $ 21,222        52.5   $ 35,254        61.6   $ (14,032     (39.8 )% 

Sopris Learning

     6,647        16.4     8,370        14.6     (1,723     (20.6 )% 

Cambium Learning Technologies

     12,560        31.1     13,567        23.7     (1,007     (7.4 )% 
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Total net revenues

     40,429        100.0     57,191        100.0     (16,762     (29.3 )% 

Cost of revenues:

            

Voyager Learning

     10,025        24.8     13,947        24.4     3,922        28.1

Sopris Learning

     2,344        5.8     2,568        4.5     224        8.7

Cambium Learning Technologies

     1,165        2.9     1,232        2.2     67        5.4

Shared Services

     863        2.1     72        0.1     (791     (1098.6 )% 

Amortization expense

     6,579        16.3     6,844        12.0     265        3.9
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Total cost of revenues

     20,976        51.9     24,663        43.1     3,687        14.9

Research and development expense

     2,652        6.6     2,515        4.4     (137     (5.4 )% 

Sales and marketing expense

     12,041        29.8     12,874        22.5     833        6.5

General and administrative expense

     5,061        12.5     5,529        9.7     468        8.5

Shipping costs

     954        2.4     817        1.4     (137     (16.8 )% 

Depreciation and amortization expense

     1,591        3.9     1,748        3.1     157        9.0

Goodwill impairment

     14,700        36.4     —          0.0     (14,700     (100.0 )% 

Embezzlement and related expense (recoveries)

     44        0.1     40        0.1     (4     (10.0 )% 

Impairment of long-lived assets

     320        0.8     —          0.0     (320     100.0
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Income (loss) before interest, other income (expense) and income taxes

     (17,910     (44.3 )%      9,005        15.7     (26,915     (298.9 )% 

Net interest expense

     (4,627     (11.4 )%      (4,882     (8.5 )%      255        5.2

Other income (expense), net

     37        0.1     2        0.0     35        1750.0

Income tax benefit (expense)

     23        0.1     (318     (0.6 )%      341        107.2
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Net (loss) income

   $ (22,477     (55.6 )%    $ 3,807        6.7   $ (26,284     (690.4 )% 
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Net Revenues.

Our total net revenues decreased $16.8 million, or 29.3%, to $40.4 million in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. This decrease in net revenue was driven by order volume declines in each of our business units primarily as a result of a reduction in funding available to our customers.

Voyager Learning. The Voyager Learning segment’s net revenues decreased $14.0 million, or 39.8%, to $21.2 million in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 due to a decline in order volume.

Sopris Learning. The Sopris Learning segment’s net revenues decreased $1.7 million, or 20.6%, to $6.6 million in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011, which is attributable to reduced order volumes.

Cambium Learning Technologies. The CLT segment’s net revenues decreased $1.0 million, or 7.4%, to $12.6 million in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 due to decreased order volume in our perpetual software and hardware product lines. Our online products showed continued order volume growth during the second quarter of 2012, but this growth was insufficient to offset the declines in the other product lines as a large portion of these sales are recognized over a subscription period.

Cost of Revenues.

Cost of revenues includes expenses to print, purchase, handle and warehouse our products, as well as order processing and royalty costs, and to provide services and support to customers. Cost of revenues, excluding amortization, decreased $3.4 million, or 19.2%, to $14.4 million in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to a reduction in order volume. Although cost of revenues declined compared to the second quarter of 2011, the reduction was not as significant as the decline in net

 

27


Table of Contents

revenues due to several factors: a significant portion of our cost of revenues are fixed costs versus variable costs; our sales mix shifted toward higher cost service offerings; excess inventory write-downs increased compared to the second quarter of 2011; and we incurred $0.9 million of charges in connection with our reengineering and restructuring initiative.

Voyager Learning. Cost of revenues for the Voyager Learning segment decreased $3.9 million, or 28.1%, to $10.0 million in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to a reduction in order volume. Although cost of revenues declined compared to the second quarter of 2011, the reduction was not as significant as the decline in net revenues due to several factors: a significant portion of our cost of revenues are fixed costs versus variable costs; our sales mix shifted toward higher cost service offerings; and excess inventory write-downs increased compared to the second quarter of 2011.

Sopris Learning. Cost of revenues for the Sopris Learning segment decreased by $0.2 million, or 8.7%, to $2.3 million in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to a reduction in order volume.

Cambium Learning Technologies . Cost of revenues for the CLT segment decreased by $0.1 million, or 5.4%, to $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to a decline in order volume.

Shared Services. Cost of revenues for Shared Services for the second quarter of 2012 of $0.9 million relate to our reengineering and restructuring initiative. The charges incurred in the first half of 2011 of $0.1 million primarily related to the costs incurred to maintain our customer-facing software applications.

Amortization Expense.

Amortization expense included in cost of revenues includes amortization for acquired pre-publication costs and technology, acquired publishing rights, and developed pre-publication and technology. Amortization for the second quarter of 2012 decreased $0.3 million compared to the second quarter of 2011, or 3.9%, primarily due to the fact that a majority of our intangible assets are amortized using accelerated methodologies.

Research and Development Expense.

Research and development expenditures include costs to research, evaluate and develop educational products, net of capitalization. Research and development expense recognized in the second quarter of 2012 increased $0.1 million, or 5.4%, from the second quarter of 2011 to $2.7 million. This increase is primarily due to charges of $0.2 million related to our reengineering and restructuring efforts. Although revenues declined from the second quarter of 2011, we will maintain our research and development spending at historical levels to increase the flow of new and enhanced products.

Sales and Marketing Expense.

Sales and marketing expenditures include all costs to maintain our various sales channels, including the salaries and commissions paid to our sales force, and costs related to our advertising and marketing efforts. Sales and marketing expense for the second quarter of 2012 decreased $0.8 million, or 6.5%, from the second quarter of 2011 to $12.0 million. This decrease is primarily due to reduced employee and contractor related costs and product samples slightly offset by the $0.4 million of costs incurred in connection with our reengineering and restructuring initiative.

General and Administrative Expense.

General and administrative expenses recognized in the second quarter of 2012 decreased $0.5 million, or 8.5%, from the second quarter of 2011 to $5.1 million. This decline is primarily due to reductions in stock-based compensation expense and CVR expense offset by charges incurred in the second quarter of 2012 related to our reengineering and restructuring initiative.

Shipping and Handling Costs.

Shipping and handling costs recognized in the second quarter of 2012 increased $0.1 million, or 16.8%, from the second quarter of 2011 to $1.0 million. This increase is attributable to costs incurred to move inventory to the new warehouse as part of our reengineering and restructuring initiative partially offset by reduced shipping and handling costs from lower sales volumes.

Goodwill Impairment.

We determined during the second quarter of 2012 that the goodwill balance for the reporting unit comprising the Kurzweil and IntelliTools product lines from the CLT segment was partially impaired. As such an impairment charge of $14.7 million was recorded. The goodwill impairment charge was primarily the result of lowered forecasts of future sales for that reporting unit.

See Note 5 in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on our goodwill impairment review.

 

28


Table of Contents

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.

The impairment expense recorded in the second quarter of $0.3 million relates to charges from the impairment of previously capitalized development costs that, as a result of certain actions in our restructuring and reengineering initiative were, determined to have no ongoing value.

Net Interest Expense.

Net interest expense decreased by $0.3 million, or 5.2%, to $4.6 million in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to an increase in interest income on state tax receivables and an increase in interest capitalization.

Income Tax Provision.

We recorded income tax expense of ($0.1) million during the second quarter of 2012 and $0.3 million during the second quarter of 2011 for state income tax expense in states where the Company cannot file on a unitary basis. We did not record a Federal or state income tax benefit for consolidated losses incurred during either period because realization of the tax benefits from the losses is not assured beyond a reasonable doubt given the Company’s recent history of cumulative losses. Therefore the increases in net deferred tax assets in the periods were offset by increases in the valuation allowance.

First Half of Fiscal 2012 Compared to the First Half of Fiscal 2011

 

(in thousands)    Six Months Ended     Year Over Year Change  
     June 30, 2012     June 30, 2011     Favorable/(Unfavorable)  
     Amount     % of
Revenues
    Amount     % of
Revenues
    $     %  

Net revenues:

            

Voyager Learning

   $ 33,258        48.7   $ 49,946        56.8   $ (16,688     (33.4 )% 

Sopris Learning

     9,859        14.4     12,555        14.3     (2,696     (21.5 )% 

Cambium Learning Technologies

     25,167        36.9     25,385        28.9     (218     (0.9 )% 
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Total net revenues

     68,284        100.0     87,886        100.0     (19,602     (22.3 )% 

Cost of revenues:

            

Voyager Learning

     17,976        26.3     21,940        25.0     3,964        18.1

Sopris Learning

     3,660        5.4     4,238        4.8     578        13.6

Cambium Learning Technologies

     2,497        3.7     2,455        2.8     (42     (1.7 )% 

Shared Services

     1,430        2.1     153        0.2     (1,277     (834.6 )% 

Amortization expense

     12,949        19.0     13,462        15.3     513        3.8
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Total cost of revenues

     38,512        56.4     42,248        48.1     3,736        8.8

Research and development expense

     5,984        8.8     4,894        5.6     (1,090     (22.3 )% 

Sales and marketing expense

     23,937        35.1     23,777        27.1     (160     (0.7 )% 

General and administrative expense

     10,806        15.8     11,341        12.9     535        4.7

Shipping costs

     1,281        1.9     1,151        1.3     (130     (11.3 )% 

Depreciation and amortization expense

     3,250        4.8     3,484        4.0     234        6.7

Goodwill impairment

     14,700        21.5     —          0.0     (14,700     (100.0 )% 

Embezzlement and related expense (recoveries)

     (41     (0.1 )%      (2,396     (2.7 )%      (2,355     (98.3 )% 

Impairment of long-lived assets

     3,111        4.6     —          0.0     (3,111     (100.0 )% 
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Income (loss) before interest, other income (expense) and income taxes

     (33,256     (48.7 )%      3,387        3.9     (36,643     (1081.9 )% 

Net interest expense

     (9,404     (13.8 )%      (9,287     (10.6 )%      (117     (1.3 )% 

Other income (expense), net

     73        0.1     365        0.4     (292     (80.0 )% 

Income tax expense

     (154     (0.2 )%      (415     (0.5 )%      261        62.9
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Net loss

   $ (42,741     (62.6 )%    $ (5,950     (6.8 )%    $ (36,791     (618.3 )% 
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Net Revenues.

Our total net revenues decreased $19.6 million, or 22.3%, to $68.3 million in the first half of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 due to a decline in order volume in each of our business units primarily as a result of a reduction in funding available to our customers.

 

29


Table of Contents

Voyager Learning. The Voyager Learning segment’s net revenues decreased $16.7 million, or 33.4%, to $33.3 million in the first half of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 due to a decline in order volume.

Sopris Learning. The Sopris Learning segment’s net revenues decreased $2.7 million, or 21.5%, to $9.9 million in the first half of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011, which is attributable to decreased order volume.

Cambium Learning Technologies. The CLT segment’s net revenues decreased $0.2 million, or 0.9%, to $25.2 million in the first half of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. This decline was primarily driven by reduced order volume in our perpetual software and hardware product lines. Our online products showed continued order volume growth during the first half of 2012, but this growth was insufficient to offset the decline in the other product lines as a large portion of these sales are recognized over a subscription period.

Cost of Revenues.

Cost of revenues includes expenses to print, purchase, handle and warehouse our products, as well as order processing and royalty costs, and to provide services and support to customers. Cost of revenues, excluding amortization, decreased $3.2 million, or 11.2%, to $25.6 million in the first half of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to a reduction in order volume. Although cost of revenues declined compared to the first half of 2011, the reduction was not as significant as the decline in net revenues due to several factors: a significant portion of our cost of revenues are fixed costs versus variable costs; our sales mix shifted toward higher cost service offerings; excess inventory write-downs increased compared to the first half of 2011; and we incurred $1.4 million of charges in connection with our reengineering and restructuring initiative.

Voyager Learning. Cost of revenues for the Voyager Learning segment decreased $4.0 million, or 18.1%, to $18.0 million in the first half of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to a reduction in order volume. Although cost of revenues declined compared to the first half of 2011, the reduction was not as significant as the decline in net revenues due to several factors: a significant portion of our cost of revenues are fixed costs versus variable costs; our sales mix shifted toward higher cost service offerings; and excess inventory write-downs increased compared to the first half of 2011.

Sopris Learning. Cost of revenues for the Sopris Learning segment decreased by $0.6 million, or 13.6%, to $3.7 million in the first half of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to a reduction in order volume.

Cambium Learning Technologies. Cost of revenues for the CLT segment increased by $0.1 million, or 1.7%, to $2.5 million in the first half of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to higher employee related costs slightly offset by product related costs due to lower order volumes.

Shared Services. Cost of revenues for Shared Services for the first half of 2012 of $1.4 million relate to our reengineering and restructuring initiative. The charges incurred in the first half of 2011 of $0.2 million primarily relate to the costs incurred to maintain our customer-facing software applications.

Amortization Expense.

Amortization expense included in cost of revenues includes amortization for acquired pre-publication costs and technology, acquired publishing rights, and developed pre-publication and technology. Amortization for the first half of 2012 decreased $0.5 million compared to the first half of 2011, or 3.8%, primarily due to the fact that a majority of our intangible assets are amortized using accelerated methodologies.

Research and Development Expense.

Research and development expenditures include costs to research, evaluate and develop educational products, net of capitalization. Research and development expense for the first half of 2012 increased $1.1 million, or 22.3%, to $6.0 million compared to the first half of 2011 primarily due to an increase in employee and contractor costs related to our continued investment in technology development. Additionally, the first half of 2012 includes charges of $0.3 million incurred in connection with our restructuring and reengineering initiative. Although revenues declined from the first half of 2011, we will maintain our research and development spending at historical levels to increase the flow of new and enhanced products.

Sales and Marketing Expense.

Sales and marketing expenditures include all costs to maintain our various sales channels, including the salaries and commissions paid to our sales force, and costs related to our advertising and marketing efforts. Sales and marketing expense for the first half of 2012 increased $0.2 million, or 0.7%, from the first half of 2011 to $23.9 million. This increase was primarily due to $0.5 million of costs incurred in connection with our reengineering and restructuring initiative partially offset by a decline in product samples.

 

30


Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expense.

General and administrative expenses for the first half of 2012 decreased $0.5 million, or 4.7%, to $10.8 million compared to the first half of 2011. This decline is primarily due to reductions in CVR expense, stock based compensation expense and costs related to mergers and acquisitions slightly offset by charges incurred in connection with the reengineering and restructuring initiative and increased employee and travel related costs.

Shipping and Handling Costs.

Shipping and handling costs recognized in the first half of 2012 increased $0.1 million, or 11.3%, from the first half of 2011 to $1.3 million. This increase is attributable to costs incurred to move inventory to the new warehouse as part of our reengineering and restructuring initiative partially offset by reduced shipping and handling costs from lower sales volumes.

Goodwill Impairment.

We determined during the second quarter of 2012 that the goodwill balance for the reporting unit comprising the Kurzweil and IntelliTools product lines from the CLT segment was partially impaired. As such an impairment charge of $14.7 million was recorded. The goodwill impairment charge was primarily the result of lowered forecasts of future sales for that reporting unit.

See Note 5 in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on our goodwill impairment review.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.

In connection with our reengineering and restructuring initiative mentioned above, during the six months ended June 30, 2012 we recorded an impairment charge of $3.1 million primarily related to our leased facility in Frederick, Colorado and warehouse related assets. We completed the outsourcing of our warehouse operations to a third party logistics provider during the quarter ended June 30, 2012. The impairment expense recorded in the first half of 2012 also included $0.3 million of charges from the impairment of previously capitalized development costs that, as a result of certain actions in our restructuring and reengineering initiative, were determined to have no ongoing value.

Net Interest Expense.

Net interest expense for the first half of 2012 increased $0.1 million, or 1.3%, to $9.4 million compared to the first half of 2011 due to an increase in the interest on our long-term debt.

Income Tax Provision.

We recorded income tax expense of $0.2 million during the first half of 2012 and $0.4 million during the first half of 2011 for state income tax expense in states where the Company cannot file on a unitary basis. We did not record a Federal or state income tax benefit for consolidated losses incurred during either period because realization of the tax benefits from the losses is not assured beyond a reasonable doubt given the Company’s recent history of cumulative losses. Therefore the increases in net deferred tax assets in the periods were offset by increases in the valuation allowance.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company has historically provided surplus cash flow in a calendar year. Because sales seasonality affects operating cash flow, we normally incur a net cash deficit from all of our activities through the early part of the third quarter of the year. We typically fund these seasonal deficits through the drawdown of cash, supplemented by borrowings on a revolving credit facility, if needed. The primary sources of liquidity are our current cash balances and our annual cash flow from operations and the primary liquidity requirements relate to interest on our long-term debt, pre-publication costs, capital investments and working capital. We believe that based on current and anticipated levels of operating performance, cash flow from operations and availability under a revolving credit facility, we will be able to make required interest payments on our debt and fund our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the next 12 months. Although we have healthy cash balances, due to the downturn in our business environment, we will be more targeted in making planned internal investments and executing on selected acquisition targets. Should the Company be unsuccessful over time in reversing the downward sales volume trend experienced in the first half of 2012, the Company’s historic trend of providing surplus cash each year would be at risk absent additional cost reductions in non-critical areas.

Long-term debt

In February 2011, the Company closed an offering of $175 million aggregate principal amount of 9.75% senior secured notes due 2017 (the “Notes”) and entered into an asset-based revolving credit facility with potential for up to $40 million in borrowing capacity. Deferred financing costs are capitalized in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets, net of accumulated amortization, and are to be amortized over the term of the related debt using the effective interest method. Unamortized capitalized deferred financing costs at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were $6.9 million and $7.7 million, respectively.

 

31


Table of Contents

Interest on the Notes will accrue at a rate of 9.75% per annum from the date of original issuance and will be payable semi-annually in arrears on each February 15 and August 15, to the holders of record of the Notes on the immediately preceding February 1 and August 1. No principal repayments are due until the maturity date of the Notes.

The Notes are secured by (i) a first priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s assets (other than inventory and accounts receivable and related assets of the ABL Credit Parties in connection with the ABL Facility (each as defined and discussed below) and subject to certain exceptions), including capital stock of the guarantors (which are certain of the Company’s subsidiaries), and (ii) a second-priority lien on substantially all of the inventory and accounts receivable and related assets of the ABL Credit Parties, in each case, subject to certain permitted liens. The Notes also contain customary covenants, including limitations on the Company’s ability to incur debt, and events of default as defined by the agreement. The Company may, at its option, redeem the Notes prior to their maturity based on the terms included in the agreement.

ABL Facility. In February 2011, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Cambium Learning, Inc. (together with its wholly owned subsidiaries, the “ABL Credit Parties”), entered into a credit facility (the “ABL Facility”) pursuant to a Loan and Security Agreement (the “ABL Loan Agreement”), by and among the ABL Credit Parties, Harris N.A., individually and as Agent (the “Agent”) for any ABL Lender (as hereinafter defined) which is or becomes a party to said ABL Loan Agreement, certain other lenders party thereto (together with Harris N.A. in its capacity as a lender, the “ABL Lenders”), Barclays Bank PLC, individually and as Collateral Agent, and BMO Capital Markets and Barclays Capital, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Runners. The ABL Facility consists of a four-year $40.0 million revolving credit facility, which includes a $5.0 million subfacility for swing line loans and a $5.0 million subfacility for letters of credit. In addition, the ABL Facility provides that the ABL Credit Parties may increase the aggregate principal amount of the ABL Facility by up to an additional $20.0 million, subject to the consent of the Agent (whose consent shall not be unreasonably withheld) and subject to the satisfaction of certain other conditions.

The interest rate for the ABL Facility will be, at the ABL Credit Parties’ option, either an amount to be determined (ranging from 2.75% to 3.25%, depending upon the ABL Credit Parties’ fixed charge coverage ratio at the time) above the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or at an amount to be determined (ranging from 1.75% to 2.25%, depending upon the ABL Credit Parties’ fixed charge coverage ratio at the time) above the “base rate.” On any day, the base rate will be the greatest of (i) the Agent’s then-effective prime commercial rate, (ii) an average federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) the LIBOR quoted rate plus 1.00%. The ABL Facility is, subject to certain exceptions, secured by a first-priority lien on the ABL Credit Parties’ inventory and accounts receivable and related assets and a second-priority lien (junior to the lien securing the ABL Credit Parties’ obligations with respect to the Notes) on substantially all of the ABL Credit Parties’ other assets.

As of June 30, 2012, the balances of accounts receivable and inventory collateralizing the ABL Facility were $25.3 million and $20.8 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had a borrowing base under the ABL Loan Agreement of up to $31.4 million.

Revolving loans under the ABL Facility may be used solely for (i) the satisfaction of existing indebtedness of the ABL Credit Parties under their prior senior secured credit facility and outstanding pursuant to their prior existing senior unsecured notes, (ii) general operating capital needs of the ABL Credit Parties in a manner consistent with the provisions of the ABL Facility and all applicable laws, (iii) working capital and other general corporate purposes in a manner consistent with the provisions of the ABL Facility and all applicable laws, (iv) the payment of certain fees and expenses incurred in connection with the ABL Facility and/or the Notes, and (v) other purposes permitted under the ABL Loan Agreement.

The ABL Facility contains a financial covenant that generally requires the ABL Credit Parties to maintain, on a consolidated basis, either (i) excess availability of at least the greater of $8 million and 15% of the revolver commitment or (ii) a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.1 to 1.0. The ABL Credit Parties will be required to pay, quarterly in arrears, an unused line fee equal to the product of (x) either 0.375% or 0.50% (depending upon the ABL Credit Parties’ fixed charge coverage ratio at the time) and (y) the average daily unused amount of the revolver. As of June 30, 2012, we were in compliance with this covenant.

 

32


Table of Contents

Cash flows

Cash from operations is seasonal, with more cash generated in the second half of the year than in the first half of the year. Cash is historically generated during the second half of the year because the buying cycle of school districts generally starts at the beginning of each new school year in the fall. Cash provided by (used in) our operating, investing and financing activities is summarized below:

 

     For the six months ended June 30,  
(in thousands)    2012     2011  

Operating activities

   $ (22,068   $ 656   

Investing activities

     (8,427     (8,711

Financing activities

     (1,093     8,802   

Operating activities. Cash provided by (used in) operations was ($22.1) million and $0.7 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Overall, cash flow from operations declined by approximately $22.7 million primarily due to the reduction in revenues compared to the first half of 2011. Additionally, the first half of 2012 included interest payments of $8.5 million and cash outflows of $2.1 million related to our reengineering and restructuring initiative while the first half of 2011 included the collection of significant accounts receivable balances outstanding at year end 2010.

Investing activities. Cash used in investing activities was $8.4 million in the first half of 2012 compared to $8.7 million in the first half of 2011. 2011 cash outflows included a CVR payment of $2.0 million, but 2012 capital expenditures are $1.7 million higher than the prior year.

Financing activities. Cash provided by (used in) financing activities was ($1.1) million in the first half of 2012 and $8.8 million in the first half of 2011. During the first half of 2012, cash used in financing activities consisted of capital lease payments of $0.6 million and the $0.5 million share repurchase. 2011 net proceeds received from the issuance of the 9.75% senior secured notes was $174 million offset by repayment of $152.1 million of existing notes and payments of $8.0 million related to the debt financing costs. Additionally, we made a stock repurchase in the second quarter of 2011 at a cost of $4.9 million.

Contingency

The Company had a potential contingent liability related to state income taxes and related interest that had been assessed against a former subsidiary. On August 27, 2010, the former subsidiary received a decision and order of determination from the Michigan taxing authority. According to the determination of the Michigan taxing authority, the former subsidiary was liable to the State of Michigan for unpaid taxes and interest in the amount of approximately $10.4 million. In order to expedite resolution of this matter and access the Michigan Court of Claims, the Company paid this liability to the state of Michigan on behalf of the former subsidiary on September 7, 2010 and filed an action in the Michigan Court of Claims to pursue a refund of the assessment. On November 16, 2011, the Court of Claims in Michigan ruled in favor of the Company’s motion for summary judgment. The Michigan state taxing authority has since appealed the decision of the Court of Claims to the Michigan Court of Appeals.

As management believes it is more likely than not that the Company’s position will ultimately be upheld, a tax receivable for the expected refund plus statutory interest is recorded in other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets totaling $11.3 million and $11.0 million as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

This liability was identified as an agreed contingency for purposes of the CVRs issued as part of a 2009 merger. In accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, dated June 20, 2009, fifty percent (50%) of any amount that is paid or due and payable with respect to each agreed contingency would offset payments due under the CVRs from an amount held for such payments by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as escrow agent, in an escrow account. Upon payment of the approximately $10.4 million, the Company requested a disbursement to the Company from the escrow account in an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the payment, or approximately $5.2 million. This cash disbursement was received by the Company during the third quarter of 2010. On September 20, 2010, the Company amended the merger agreement and the escrow agreement to extend the term of the escrow agreement until the later of the full distribution of the escrow funds or the final resolution of the agreed contingency. The final resolution of the tax litigation or potential settlement could result in a total refund from the taxing authority to the Company ranging from zero to approximately $11.3 million as of June 30, 2012, and 50% of any such refund would in turn be payable to the holders of the CVRs. As of June 30, 2012, the Company has recorded $5.1 million as a component of the CVR liability related to this agreed upon contingency, which is an estimate of the fair value based on a probability-weighted cash flow analysis using management assumptions related to the likelihood of the ultimate cash outflows. If the former subsidiary’s position is not ultimately upheld, the Company could incur non-cash charges of up to $10.4 million of indemnification expense and a $0.9 million reduction in interest income in future periods on its Statements of Operations, partially offset by the related $5.1 million reduction to the CVRs liability.

The Court of Claims in Michigan also ruled in the Company’s favor on two other tax matters that could result in a refund of up to $0.8 million, plus statutory interest. These potential tax refunds would be retained by the Company and are not subject to payment to the holders of the CVRs.

 

33


Table of Contents

Non-GAAP Measures

The net income (loss) as reported on a GAAP basis includes material non-recurring and non-operational items. We believe that earnings (loss) from operations before interest and other income (expense), income taxes, and depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, and Adjusted EBITDA, which further excludes non-recurring and non-operational items, provide useful information for investors to assess the results of the ongoing business of the combined company.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not prepared in accordance with GAAP and may be different from similarly named, non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors because it reflects the underlying performance of the ongoing operations of the Company and provides investors with a view of the Company’s operations from management’s perspective. Adjusted EBITDA removes significant one-time or certain non-cash items from earnings. We use Adjusted EBITDA to monitor and evaluate the operating performance of the Company and as the basis to set and measure progress towards performance targets, which directly affect compensation for employees and executives. We generally use these non-GAAP measures as measures of operating performance and not as measures of liquidity. Our presentation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an indication that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or nonrecurring items.

 

34


Table of Contents

Below are reconciliations between net (loss) income and Adjusted EBITDA for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:

Reconciliation Between Net Revenues and Adjusted Net Revenues and Between Net (Loss) Income and Adjusted EBITDA for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

 

     Three Months Ended June 30,  
     2012     2011  
     (In thousands)  
     (Unaudited)  

Total net revenues

   $ 40,429      $ 57,191   

Non-recurring and non-operational costs included in net revenues but excluded from adjusted net revenues: Adjustments related to purchase accounting (a)

     123        323   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted net revenues

   $ 40,552      $ 57,514   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

     (22,477     3,807   

Reconciling items between net income (loss) and EBITDA:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     8,170        8,592   

Net interest expense

     4,627        4,882   

Other income, net

     (37     (2

Income tax (benefit) expense

     (23     318   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations before interest and other income (expense), income taxes, and depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)

     (9,740     17,597   

Non-recurring, non-operational, and certain non-cash costs included in EBITDA but excluded from Adjusted EBITDA:

    

Re-engineering and restructuring costs (b)

     2,045        —     

Merger and acquisition activities (c)

     343        366   

Stock-based compensation expense (d)

     (20     314   

Embezzlement and related expenses (recoveries) (e)

     44        40   

Adjustments related to purchase accounting (a)

     95        283   

Adjustments to CVR liability (f)

     54        212   

Goodwill impairment (g)

     14,700        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

   $ 7,521      $ 18,812   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

35


Table of Contents

Reconciliation Between Net Revenues and Adjusted Net Revenues and Between Net Loss and Adjusted EBITDA for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

 

     Six Months Ended June 30,  
     2012     2011  
     (In thousands)  
     (Unaudited)  

Total net revenues

   $ 68,284      $ 87,886   

Non-recurring and non-operational costs included in net revenues but excluded from adjusted net revenues: Adjustments related to purchase accounting (a)

     255        655   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted net revenues

   $ 68,539      $ 88,541   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss

   $ (42,741   $ (5,950

Reconciling items between net loss and EBITDA:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     16,199        16,946   

Net interest expense

     9,404        9,287   

Other income, net

     (73     (365

Income tax expense

     154        415   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations before interest and other income (expense), income taxes, and depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)

     (17,057     20,333   

Non-recurring, non-operational, and certain non-cash costs included in EBITDA but excluded from Adjusted EBITDA:

    

Re-engineering and restructuring costs (b)

     5,749        —     

Merger and acquisition activities (c)

     524        677   

Stock-based compensation expense (d)

     205        604   

Embezzlement and related expenses (recoveries) (e)

     (41     (2,396

Adjustments related to purchase accounting (a)

     198        571   

Adjustments to CVR liability (f)

     107        520   

Goodwill impairment (g)

     14,700        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

   $ 4,385      $ 20,309   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(a) Under applicable accounting guidance for business combinations, an acquiring entity is required to recognize all of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition date fair value. Net revenues have been reduced by $0.1 million, $0.3 million, $0.3 million, and $0.7 million, respectively, for the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 in the historical financial statements due to the write-down of deferred revenue to its estimated fair value as of the merger date. The write-down was determined by estimating the cost to fulfill the related future customer obligations plus a normal profit margin. Partially offsetting this impact, cost of revenues were reduced for other purchase accounting adjustments, primarily a write-down of deferred costs to zero at the acquisition date. During the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the historical cost of revenues was reduced by zero, $0.1 million, $0.1 million, and $0.1 million, respectively. The adjustment of deferred revenue and deferred costs to fair value is required only at the purchase accounting date; therefore, its impact on net revenues and cost of revenues is non-recurring.

 

36


Table of Contents
(b) In late 2011, we launched a reengineering and restructuring initiative to align our organizational and cost structure to our strategic goals. The financial goal of these actions is to provide savings to both improve earnings and to fund re-investment in growth areas of the business. The majority of these costs are expected to be incurred by the end of 2012. Reengineering and restructuring activities will be assessed and enacted throughout 2012 and are expected to include: (1) Obtaining new leadership and employee skill sets that support our transformation to focus more heavily on technology solutions and services and other strategic objectives; (2) Outsourcing warehouse operations to a third party logistics provider, which will allow us to take advantage of a lower and more variable cost structure for our print based products, as well as locate operations closer to the geographic center of our nationwide customer base; (3) Rationalizing facilities space by consolidating facilities and subleasing entire or partial facilities where feasible; (4) Assessing and implementing projects to improve cost efficiencies and enhance the customer experience throughout the order to cash, service delivery, and procurement processes; (5) Reduction of job positions that do not support the Company’s key strategic goals; and (6) Other reductions as needed to improve our cost structure. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 we recorded reengineering and restructuring charges of $2.0 million and $5.7 million, respectively, including impairment charges of $3.1 million related to our leased facility in Frederick, Colorado and warehouse related assets and previously capitalized amounts that were determined to have no ongoing value.
(c) Certain costs related to merger and acquisition activities including due diligence and other non-operational charges including liabilities such as pension and severance costs for former employees.
(d) Stock-based compensation and expense is related to our outstanding options, restricted stock awards, warrants, and stock appreciation rights (SARs).
(e) During 2008, we discovered certain irregularities relating to the control and use of cash and certain other general ledger items which resulted from a substantial misappropriation of assets over more than a three-year period beginning in 2004 and continuing through April 2008. These irregularities were perpetrated by a former employee, resulting in embezzlement losses, net of recoveries.
(f) Adjustments to the CVR liability as a result of the amendments of the merger agreement and the related escrow agreement, the expiration of the statute of limitations on potential tax liabilities and changes in likelihood of collecting potential tax receivables included in the estimate of the fair value of the CVRs.
(g) For additional information on goodwill impairment charges, see Note 5 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements as of June 30, 2012 that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial conditions, sales or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Contractual Obligations

On February 15, 2012, our Board of Directors approved a plan to outsource our warehouse operations to a third party logistics provider, Ozburn Hessey Logistics (“OHL”), and to cease use of the leased facility in Frederick, Colorado that includes our warehouse and other office space. Warehouse operations in Frederick were transferred to OHL and the facility was made available for sublease in the quarter ending June 30, 2012.

There have been no other material changes in the contractual obligations disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Recently Issued Financial Accounting Standards

In June 2011, new guidance was issued regarding the disclosure of the components of comprehensive income. This guidance gives the entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In either option, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. This guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. This guidance does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is required to be adopted retrospectively. The Company adopted this guidance beginning with its Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2012.

 

37


Table of Contents

In September 2011, new guidance was issued regarding testing goodwill for impairment. The revised standard is intended to reduce the cost and complexity of the annual goodwill impairment test by providing entities with the option of performing a “qualitative” assessment to determine if it is more-likely-than-not that goodwill might be impaired and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test required under current accounting standards. The revised standard is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company will adopt the revised standard in 2012. The Company does not believe that the disclosure requirements of this standard will have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Interest Rate Risk

As described in Note 14 to our condensed consolidated financial statements, in February 2011, we closed an offering of $175 million aggregate principal amount of Notes (fixed rate) due 2017 and entered into a $40 million asset-based revolving credit facility. We have no amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility, which is our only variable interest debt. Therefore, as of June 30, 2012 we have no material interest rate risk.

Foreign Currency Risk

The Company does not have material exposure to changes in foreign currency rates. As of June 30, 2012, the Company does not have any outstanding foreign currency forwards or option contracts.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management of the Company, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis and that such information is communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and its Board of Directors, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2012.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II. Other Information

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

As previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company is involved in a tax litigation matter related to a Michigan state tax issue. The final resolution of the tax litigation or potential settlement could result in a total refund from the taxing authority to the Company ranging from zero to approximately $11.3 million as of June 30, 2012, and 50% of any such refund would in turn be payable to the holders of the CVRs. As of June 30, 2012, the Company has recorded $5.1 million as a component of the CVR liability related to this agreed upon contingency, which is an estimate of the fair value based on a probability-weighted cash flow analysis using management assumptions related to the likelihood of the ultimate cash outflows. If the former subsidiary’s position is not ultimately upheld, the Company could incur non-cash charges of up to $10.4 million of indemnification expense and a $0.9 million reduction in interest income in future periods on its Statements of Operations, partially offset by the related $5.1 million reduction to the CVRs liability. As management believes it is more likely than not that the Company’s position will ultimately be upheld, a tax receivable for the expected refund plus statutory interest is recorded in other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets totaling $11.3 million and $11.0 million as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

 

38


Table of Contents
Item 1A. Risk Factors.

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as such factors could materially affect the Company’s business, financial condition, or future results. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, there were no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The risks described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks the Company faces. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company, or that the Company currently deems to be immaterial, also may have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, or results of operations.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

The following is a description of the Company’s securities that were issued or sold by the Company during the period covered by this report and which were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

Warrants to Purchase Common Stock

During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, the number of shares of common stock of the Company underlying the warrant issued to VSS-Cambium Holdings III, LLC, the sole stockholder of VSS-Cambium Holdings II Corp. (“Cambium”) immediately prior to the Company’s acquisition of Cambium, as part of the merger consideration payable to such stockholder in connection with the Cambium merger, was increased by 1,627 shares. The increase resulted from cash recoveries during the quarter in connection with the employee embezzlement matter, in accordance with the terms of the warrant. The warrant is exercisable for shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, and expires on December 8, 2014. The number of shares of common stock issuable under the warrant may be further increased in the future upon the occurrence of certain events described in the warrant. The issuance of these securities to VSS-Cambium Holdings III, LLC was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

Stock Repurchases

Shares of common stock repurchased by the Company during the quarter ended June 30, 2012, were as follows:

 

     Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities  
     (a)                    (b)  
Period:    Total Number of
Shares Purchased
     Average Price
Paid per Share
     Total Number of  Shares
Purchased as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or  Programs
     Maximum Number of Shares
that May Yet be Purchased
Under the Program
 

April 1 - April 30

     —           —           —           —     

May 1 - May 31

     —           —           —           —     

June 1 - June 30

     440,373         1.16         440,373         —     

 

(a) On June 22, 2012, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with an investor pursuant to its share repurchase program. As previously announced, the Company’s board of directors authorized a $5 million share repurchase program through July 5, 2013. The transaction was settled on June 27, 2012 with the Company purchasing 440,373 shares for a total cost of $0.5 million. The purchase price was set at the 10 day volume-weighted average price on the date of the stock purchase agreement. Upon repurchase these treasury shares are no longer registered under the Securities Act of 1933.
(b) The Company’s share repurchases are limited to a maximum of $5 million through July 5, 2013.

 

39


Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits.

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report.

 

Exhibit
Number

  

Description

  10.1    Stock Purchase Agreement ((incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Cambium Learning Group’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 22, 2012 (File No. 001-34575))
  31.1    Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  31.2    Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.2    Certification of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.ins    XBRL Instance Document.*
101.def    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.*
101.sch    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.*
101.cal    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.*
101.lab    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.*
101.pre    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.*

 

* Furnished herewith. Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

 

40


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned duly authorized officer of the registrant.

 

Date: August 10, 2012        CAMBIUM LEARNING GROUP, INC.
      

/s/ Bradley C. Almond

       Bradley C. Almond,
       Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
       (Principal Financial Officer)

 

41


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit
Number

  

Description

  10.1    Stock Purchase Agreement ((incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Cambium Learning Group’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 22, 2012 (File No. 001-34575))
  31.1    Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  31.2    Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  32.2    Certification of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.ins    XBRL Instance Document.*
101.def    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.*
101.sch    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.*
101.cal    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.*
101.lab    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.*
101.pre    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.*

 

* Furnished herewith. Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

 

42