Document

 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 001-34746
ACCRETIVE HEALTH, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
02-0698101
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
 
 
401 North Michigan Avenue Suite 2700 Chicago, Illinois
60611
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)
(312) 324-7820
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes þ    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o

  Accelerated filer þ
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company o
 
 
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No R
As of August 1, 2016, the registrant had 107,222,530 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.


 



Accretive Health, Inc.
FORM 10-Q

For the period ended June 30, 2016
Table of Contents

Part I. Financial Information
 
Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, 2015
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited) — For the Three and Six Months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (unaudited) — For the Six Months ended June 30, 2016
 
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) — For the Six Months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
 
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
 
 
 
Part II. Other Information
 
 
 
 
SIGNATURES
 
 
 
EXHIBIT INDEX
 

1


PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Accretive Health, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
 
June 30,
2016
 
December 31,
2015
 
(Unaudited)
 
 
Assets
 
 
 
Current assets:
 

 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
$
221,673

 
$
103,497

Short-term investments

 
1,023

Accounts receivable, net
6,575

 
10,194

Prepaid income taxes
534

 
1,102

Other current assets
13,392

 
10,924

Total current assets
242,174

 
126,740

Property, equipment and software, net
30,447

 
27,217

Non-current deferred tax assets
213,908

 
300,825

Restricted cash equivalents
1,500

 
1,500

Other assets
4,902

 
4,007

Total assets
$
492,931

 
$
460,289

Liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)
 
 
 
Current liabilities:
 

 
 

Accounts payable
$
3,735

 
$
5,306

Current portion of customer liabilities
144,619

 
202,516

Current portion of customer liabilities - related party
141,089

 

Accrued compensation and benefits
16,273

 
9,062

Other accrued expenses
20,434

 
15,743

Total current liabilities
326,150

 
232,627

Non-current portion of customer liabilities
24,667

 
432,477

Non-current portion of customer liabilities - related party
26,554

 

Other non-current liabilities
9,810

 
8,498

Total liabilities
387,181

 
673,602

 
 
 
 
8.00% Series A convertible preferred stock: par value $0.01 per share, 200,000 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2016; no shares authorized or issued as of December 31, 2015 (aggregate liquidation value of $206,040 as of June 30, 2016)
163,269

 

Stockholders' equity (deficit):
 

 
 

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized,116,378,064 shares issued and 107,222,530 shares outstanding at June 30, 2016; 113,259,408 shares issued and 107,715,436 shares outstanding at December 31, 2015
1,164

 
1,133

Additional paid-in capital
353,856

 
322,492

Accumulated deficit
(355,161
)
 
(481,773
)
Accumulative other comprehensive loss
(2,732
)
 
(2,488
)
Treasury stock
(54,646
)
 
(52,677
)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)
(57,519
)
 
(213,313
)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
$
492,931

 
$
460,289

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

2


Accretive Health, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
(unaudited)
 
(unaudited)
Net services revenue ($343.4 million and $0 million from related party for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015, respectively. No related party revenue was recognized for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively)
$
8,672

 
$
22,085

 
$
360,865

 
$
33,056

Operating expenses:


 
 
 
 
 
 
  Costs of services
45,112

 
42,762

 
90,242

 
84,958

Selling, general and administrative
24,660

 
20,969

 
42,196

 
38,331

Other
8,651

 
611

 
19,457

 
1,886

Total operating expenses
78,423

 
64,342

 
151,895

 
125,175

Income (loss) from operations
(69,751
)
 
(42,257
)
 
208,970

 
(92,119
)
Net interest income
46

 
69

 
130

 
74

Income (loss) before income tax provision
(69,705
)
 
(42,188
)
 
209,100

 
(92,045
)
Income tax provision (benefit)
(28,914
)
 
(15,900
)
 
82,488

 
(35,312
)
Net income (loss)
$
(40,791
)
 
$
(26,288
)
 
$
126,612

 
$
(56,733
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) per common share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
(0.45
)
 
$
(0.27
)
 
$
0.45

 
$
(0.59
)
Diluted
$
(0.45
)
 
$
(0.27
)
 
$
0.45

 
$
(0.59
)
Weighted average shares used in calculating net income (loss) per common share:
 
 
 
 
Basic
99,414,066

 
95,941,077

 
98,851,934

 
95,915,255

Diluted
99,414,066

 
95,941,077

 
99,951,394

 
95,915,255

Consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
(40,791
)
 
(26,288
)
 
126,612

 
(56,733
)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation adjustments
(304
)
 
(221
)
 
(244
)
 
(273
)
Comprehensive income (loss)
$
(41,095
)
 
$
(26,509
)
 
$
126,368

 
$
(57,006
)

Reconciliation of net income (loss) to income (loss) available to common shareholders:
 
 
 
 
Basic:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
$
(40,791
)
 
$
(26,288
)
 
$
126,612

 
$
(56,733
)
Less dividends on preferred shares
(4,062
)
 

 
(54,360
)
 

Less income allocated to preferred shareholders

 

 
(27,797
)
 

Net income (loss) available/allocated to common shareholders - basic
$
(44,853
)
 
$
(26,288
)
 
$
44,455

 
$
(56,733
)
Diluted:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
$
(40,791
)
 
$
(26,288
)
 
$
126,612

 
$
(56,733
)
Less dividends on preferred shares
(4,062
)
 

 
(54,360
)
 

Less income allocated to preferred shareholders

 

 
(27,608
)
 

Net income (loss) available/allocated to common shareholders - diluted
$
(44,853
)
 
$
(26,288
)
 
$
44,644

 
$
(56,733
)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3


Accretive Health, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)

 
 
 
Common Stock
 
Treasury Stock
 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 
Accumulated
Deficit
 
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income (loss)
 
Total
 
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2015
 
113,259,408

 
$
1,133

 
(5,543,972
)
 
$
(52,677
)
 
$
322,492

 
$
(481,773
)
 
$
(2,488
)
 
$
(213,313
)
Share-based compensation expense
 

 

 

 

 
20,413

 

 

 
20,413

Deferred tax asset write off including shortfall of $3,177
 

 

 

 

 
(4,506
)
 

 

 
(4,506
)
Issuance of common stock related to share-based compensation plans
 
3,071,876

 
31

 

 

 
(31
)
 

 

 

Exercise of vested stock options
 
46,780

 

 

 

 
88

 

 

 
88

Beneficial conversion feature
 

 

 

 

 
48,320

 
 
 

 
48,320

Issuance of stock warrants
 

 

 

 

 
21,440

 

 

 
21,440

Accrued dividends/increase in liquidation value
 

 

 

 

 
(6,040
)
 

 

 
(6,040
)
Deemed preferred stock dividend
 

 

 

 

 
(48,320
)
 

 

 
(48,320
)
Treasury stock purchases
 

 

 
(3,611,562
)
 
(1,969
)
 

 

 

 
(1,969
)
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(244
)
 
(244
)
Net income (loss)
 

 

 

 

 

 
126,612

 

 
126,612

Balance at June 30, 2016
 
116,378,064

 
$
1,164

 
(9,155,534
)
 
$
(54,646
)
 
$
353,856

 
$
(355,161
)
 
$
(2,732
)
 
$
(57,519
)
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.


4


Accretive Health, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)

 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
 (Unaudited)
Operating activities:
 

 
 

Net income (loss)
$
126,612

 
$
(56,733
)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operations:
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
4,632

 
3,818

Share-based compensation
20,413

 
12,576

Provision/(Recoveries) for doubtful receivables
(27
)
 
(45
)
Deferred income taxes
82,420

 
(36,369
)
Excess tax benefits from share-based awards

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
3,646

 
1,101

Prepaid income taxes
503

 
445

Other assets
(3,394
)
 
(4,472
)
Accounts payable
(1,565
)
 
(7,540
)
Accrued compensation and benefits
7,213

 
(2,830
)
Other liabilities
5,079

 
(2,038
)
Customer liabilities and customer liabilities - related party
(298,064
)
 
72,904

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
(52,532
)
 
(19,183
)
Investing activities:
 
 
 
Purchases of property, equipment and software
(7,097
)
 
(8,348
)
Proceeds from maturation of short-term investments
1,023

 

Net cash used in investing activities
(6,074
)
 
(8,348
)
Financing activities:
 
 
 

Series A convertible preferred stock and warrant issuance, net of issuance costs
178,669

 

Exercise of vested options
88

 

Restricted cash released from letter of credit

 
5,000

Excess tax benefit from share-based awards

 

Purchase of treasury stock
(1,969
)
 
(517
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
176,788

 
4,483

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
(6
)
 
(222
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
118,176

 
(23,270
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
103,497

 
145,167

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
221,673

 
$
121,897

 
 
 
 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities
 
 
 
Accrued dividends payable to Preferred Stockholders
$
(4,040
)
 
$

Accrued liabilities related to purchases of property, equipment and software
991

 

Accounts payable related to purchases of property, equipment and software

 
5,250


See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

5


Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 1 — BUSINESS DESCRIPTION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Business Description
Accretive Health, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (the "Company"), is a leading provider of services that help healthcare providers generate sustainable improvements in their operating margins and cash flows while also improving patient, physician and staff satisfaction for its customers. The Company achieves these results for its customers through an integrated approach encompassing an end-to-end revenue cycle management service offering and physician advisory services. The Company does so by deploying a unique operating model that leverages its extensive healthcare site experience, innovative technology and process excellence. The Company also offers modular services, allowing clients to engage the Company for only specific components of its end-to-end revenue cycle management service offering.
The Company’s primary service offering consists of revenue cycle management ("RCM"), which helps healthcare providers to more efficiently manage their revenue cycles. This encompasses patient registration, insurance and benefit verification, medical treatment documentation and coding, bill preparation and collections from patients and payers. The Company's physician advisory services ("PAS") offering assists hospitals in complying with payer requirements regarding whether to classify a hospital visit as an in-patient or an out-patient observation case for billing purposes and consists of both concurrent review and retrospective chart audits to help its customers achieve compliant and accurate billing. The Company also provides its customers with retrospective appeal management service support for both governmental and commercial payers.
In December 2015, the Company announced a long-term strategic partnership with Ascension Health Alliance, the parent of the Company's largest customer and the nation’s largest Catholic and non-profit health system, and TowerBrook Capital Partners ("TowerBrook"), an investment management firm, which transaction (the "Transaction") was completed on February 16, 2016. As part of the Transaction, the Company amended and restated its Master Professional Services Agreement ("A&R MPSA") with Ascension Health ("Ascension") effective February 16, 2016 with a term of ten years. Pursuant to the A&R MPSA and with certain limited exceptions, the Company will become the exclusive provider of RCM services and PAS with respect to acute care services provided by the hospitals affiliated with Ascension that execute supplement agreements with the Company.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the Company's financial position as of June 30, 2016, the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, and the cash flows of the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. These financial statements include the accounts of Accretive Health, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany amounts have been eliminated in consolidation. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") for interim financial reporting and as required by the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures required for complete financial statements are not included herein. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial information, have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.



6


Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)




When preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP, the Company must make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. For a more complete discussion of the Company’s significant accounting policies and other information, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the "2015 10-K").
NOTE 2 — RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") and are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, the Company's management believes that recently issued accounting pronouncements do not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, or do not apply to the Company's operations.
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) ("ASU 2014-09"), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standard Codification 605, Revenue Recognition ("ASC 605"). ASU 2014-09 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within such reporting period, with early application permitted. The Company plans to early adopt the standard, effective January 1, 2017, and to apply the standard using the cumulative effect method to contracts for which all or substantially all of the revenue has not been recognized under GAAP as of the adoption date. The Company's ability to early adopt ASU 2014-09 is dependent on the completion of its analysis of the information necessary to calculate the cumulative effect. The Company anticipates this standard will have a material impact on it consolidated financial statements. While it is continuing to assess all potential impacts of the standard, the Company believes the most significant impact will be the recognition of revenue at the time services are provided or incentive measurements are finalized, as opposed to at the time of a contractual agreement event, which is when the Company now recognizes revenue for its end-to-end revenue cycle contracts for its base and incentive fee revenues. The Company has not yet finalized all the potential effects of the new standard on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, Customers Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement ("ASU 2015-05"). The Company adopted ASU 2015-05 on the required date of January 1, 2016 using the prospective method. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company did not enter into any new arrangements covered by this standard.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) ("ASU 2016-02"), which supersedes existing guidance on accounting for leases in Topic 840, Leases. ASU 2016-02 generally requires all leases to be recognized in the statement of financial position. The provisions of ASU 2016-02 are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018; early adoption is permitted. The provisions of ASU 2016-02 are to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. The Company has not yet determined the potential effects of this new standard on its consolidated financial statements, if any.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting ("ASU 2016-09"). ASU 2016-09 simplifies the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The provisions of ASU 2016-09 are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within

7


Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)




those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted for any entity in any interim or annual period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this prospective guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company has adopted the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements ("ASC 820"), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 does not require any new fair value measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:
Level 1:  Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;
Level 2:  Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
Level 3:  Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, which include financial assets such as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash equivalents, accounts receivable, amounts due from related party, short-term investments and certain other current assets, as well as financial liabilities such as accounts payable, customer liabilities, customer liabilities-related party, accrued compensation and benefits and certain other accrued expenses, approximate their fair values, due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The Company’s financial assets which are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis consist of cash equivalents, which are short-term investments with maturity dates of less than three months and accordingly are classified as Level 1 assets in the fair value hierarchy. The Company’s certificates of deposit are valued at face value, plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value, and are reported as Level 2 assets in the fair value hierarchy. The Company does not have any financial liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

The Company’s 8.00% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share (the “Preferred Stock”), and the Warrant (as defined in Note 10) are Level 3 financial instruments and were valued using a combination of binomial lattice and Black-Scholes models to determine the fair value allocation.  The primary assumptions used in such models were expected length of time prior to conversion, and exercise of warrants, of the Preferred Stock and Warrant (5-10 years), the exercise price of the Warrant ($3.50 per share), the risk free rate over the expected time horizon (1.35% to 1.66%), the Company’s common stock price as of February 16, 2016 ($2.65 per share), the expected annual volatility of the Company stock price (40%) and the market rate of preferred stock for comparable companies (9.50%).

8


Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)




NOTE 4 — ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
Accounts receivable is comprised of unpaid balances pertaining to non-RCM service fees and net receivable balances for RCM customers after considering cost reimbursements owed to such customers, including related accrued balances.
The Company maintains an estimated allowance for doubtful accounts to reduce its accounts receivable to the amount that it believes will be collected. This allowance is based on the Company’s historical experience, its assessment of each customer’s ability to pay, the length of time a balance has been outstanding, input from key customer resources assigned to each customer, and the status of any ongoing operations with each applicable customer.    
Movements in the allowance for doubtful accounts are as follows (in thousands):

 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
(unaudited)
 
(unaudited)
Beginning balance
$
82

 
$
239

 
$
99

 
$
314

(Recoveries) provision
(10
)
 
(54
)
 
(27
)
 
(45
)
Write-offs
(31
)
 
(73
)
 
(31
)
 
(157
)
Ending balance
$
41

 
$
112

 
$
41

 
$
112

NOTE 5 — PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE
Property, equipment and software consist of the following (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
(unaudited)
 
 
Computer and other equipment
$
20,647

 
$
21,348

Leasehold improvements
15,053

 
17,851

Software
24,445

 
22,302

Office furniture
4,522

 
4,888

    Property, equipment and software, gross
64,667

 
66,389

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
(34,220
)
 
(39,172
)
    Property, equipment and software, net
$
30,447

 
$
27,217

The following table summarizes the allocation of depreciation and amortization expense between cost of services and selling, general and administrative expenses (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
(unaudited)
 
(unaudited)
Cost of services
$
2,229

 
$
1,826

 
$
4,327

 
$
3,308

Selling, general and administrative
132

 
275

 
305

 
510

Total depreciation and amortization
$
2,361

 
$
2,101

 
$
4,632

 
$
3,818


9


Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)




NOTE 6 — CUSTOMER LIABILITIES
Customer liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
 
2016
 
2015
 
(unaudited)
 
 
Deferred customer billings, current (1)
$
229,110

 
$
130,124

Accrued service costs, current (1)
48,550

 
70,656

Customer deposits, current (1)
8,034

 
1,641

Deferred revenue, current
14

 
95

Current portion of customer liabilities
285,708

 
202,516

Deferred customer billings, non-current
$
51,221

 
$
431,944

Customer deposits, non-current (1)

 
533

Non current portion of customer liabilities
$
51,221

 
$
432,477

Total customer liabilities
$
336,929

 
$
634,993


(1) Includes $107.4 million, $25.7 million and $8.0 million in current deferred customer billings, accrued service costs and customer deposits, respectively, for a related party that is included in the current portion of customer liabilities - related party in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2016. In addition, at June 30, 2016, the Company had $26.6 million in non-current portion of customer liabilities due to such related party.
NOTE 7 — SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The share-based compensation expense relating to the Company’s stock options and restricted stock awards ("RSAs") for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $13.6 million and $7.8 million, respectively, with related tax benefits of approximately $5.4 million and $2.9 million, respectively. The share-based compensation expense relating to the Company’s stock options and RSAs for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $20.5 million and $13.0 million, respectively, with related tax benefits of approximately $8.1 million and $5.0 million, respectively.
Total share-based compensation expense that has been included in the Company's consolidated statements of operations was as follows (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
(unaudited)
 
(unaudited)
Share-based compensation expense allocation details:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of services
$
1,520

 
$
1,204

 
$
3,523

 
$
2,604

Selling, general and administrative
10,265

 
6,603

 
15,160

 
10,399

Other
1,828

 

 
1,828

 

Total share-based compensation expense (1)
$
13,613

 
$
7,807

 
$
20,511

 
$
13,003

(1) Includes $0.1 million in share-based compensation expense paid in cash during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, and $0.2 million and $0.4 million in share-based compensation expense paid in cash during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the estimated fair value of each option as of its grant date. These inputs are subjective and generally require significant analysis and judgment to develop. The Company used Monte Carlo simulations to estimate the fair value of its RSAs with vesting based on

10


Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)




market-based performance conditions as of their respective grant dates. Expected life is based on the market condition to which the vesting is tied.
The following table sets forth the significant assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the Monte Carlo simulations and the calculation of share-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
Future dividends
 
Risk-free interest rate
1.4% to 1.9%
 
1.5% to 1.8%
Expected volatility
50%
 
50%
Expected life
6.25
 
6.25
Forfeitures
5.68% annually
 
5.68% annually
The risk-free interest rate input is based on U.S. Treasury instruments, and expected volatility of the share price based upon review of the historical volatility levels of the Company’s common stock in conjunction with that of public companies that operate in similar industries or are similar in terms of stage of development or size and a projection of this information toward its future expected volatility. The Company used the simplified method to estimate the expected option life for 2016 and 2015 option grants. The simplified method was used due to the lack of sufficient historical data available to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected term of each stock option.
Stock Options
A summary of the options activity during the six months ended June 30, 2016 is shown below:
 
Shares
 
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at January 1, 2016
15,260,266

 
$
10.23

Granted
456,661

 
2.64

Exercised
(46,780
)
 
1.87

Canceled
(600,939
)
 
12.60

Forfeited
(2,042,344
)
 
7.74

Outstanding at June 30, 2016
13,026,864

 
$
9.61

Outstanding and vested and exercisable at June 30, 2016
10,364,780

 
$
10.15

Outstanding and vested and exercisable at December 31, 2015
8,876,517

 
$
11.63








11


Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)




Restricted Stock Awards
A summary of the restricted stock activity during the six months ended June 30, 2016 is shown below:
 
 
 
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
 
Shares
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2016
9,255,932

 
$
4.24

Granted
3,071,876

 
2.58

Vested
(3,046,332
)
 
3.73

Forfeited
(2,723,902
)
 
4.79

Outstanding at June 30, 2016
6,557,574

 
$
3.11

In most cases, RSA vesting is based on the passage of time. The amount of share-based compensation expense is based on the fair value of the Company's common stock on the respective grant dates and is recognized ratably over the vesting period.
The Company's RSA agreements allow employees to surrender to the Company shares of common stock upon vesting of their RSAs in lieu of their payment of the required personal employment-related taxes. The Company does not withhold taxes in excess of minimum required statutory requirements. During the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, employees delivered to the Company 887,660 and 85,086 shares of stock, respectively, which the Company recorded at a cost of approximately $2.0 million and $0.5 million, respectively. Shares surrendered for payment of personal employment-related taxes are held in treasury.
Other Matters
During the second quarter of 2016, in connection with the resignation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and restructuring plan described in Note 8 below, the vesting of certain options and RSAs was accelerated as described in the agreements previously entered into by the former employees and resulted in an increase of share-based compensation expense for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 of $7.0 million, respectively, and is recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses.
During the second quarter of 2015, in connection with the resignation of a former Chief Executive Officer of the Company from the Company's board of directors (the "Board"), the Company modified the terms of awards previously granted to such Board member. This modification allowed for the continuation of vesting of options despite his resignation from the Board, and resulted in a net increase of share-based compensation expense for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 of $3.1 million, respectively, and is recorded in other operating expenses.
NOTE 8 — OTHER
Other costs are comprised of reorganization-related and certain other costs. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company incurred $8.7 million and $19.5 million in other costs, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company incurred $0.6 million and $1.9 million in other costs, respectively.

Reorganization-related
During the second quarter of 2016, the Company initiated a restructuring plan (the "Plan") consisting of reductions in its workforce in order to align the size and composition of its workforce to its current client base, better position itself for already committed future growth, and enable the Company to more efficiently serve contracted

12


Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)




demand. The Plan affected 40 employees. The majority of the reductions occurred in June 2016, and the Company expects the Plan to be completed by the end of the third quarter of 2016. In connection with the Plan, the Company incurred pretax restructuring charges of $4.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Restructuring charges for the six months ended June 30, 2016 also include $0.7 million related to facility charges recognized in the first quarter. Restructuring charges for the three months ended June 30, 2016 primarily consisted of $2.8 million in severance and employee benefits and related expenses and $1.8 million of non-cash expense related to share based compensation expense for the acceleration of existing RSAs for affected employees. The Company did not incur restructuring charges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. The Company’s reorganization liability activity is included in accrued compensation and benefits and other accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The Company’s reorganization liability activity was as follows (in thousands):

 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
(unaudited)
 
(unaudited)
Reorganization liability, beginning balance
$
2,878

 
$
1,532

 
$
2,493

 
$
3,454

Restructuring charges
4,595

 

 
5,282

 

Cash payments
(152
)
 
(688
)
 
(454
)
 
(2,610
)
Non-cash payments
$
(1,828
)
 
 
 
$
(1,828
)
 
 
Reorganization liability, ending balance
$
5,493

 
$
844

 
$
5,493

 
$
844


Other

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company incurred other costs of $3.2 million and $13.3 million, respectively, primarily related to incentive payments and legal fees paid in connection with the closing of the transaction with Ascension Health Alliance and TowerBrook that was completed on February 16, 2016 (see Note 10). In addition, the Company recorded an accrual of $0.9 million to account for expected additional contributions to the Company's defined contribution plan for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company incurred other costs of $0.6 million and $1.9 million, respectively, primarily related to the restatement of its previously issued consolidated financial statements (the "restatement'). These costs were primarily legal, accounting and consulting costs incurred related to the restatement.

NOTE 9 — INCOME TAXES
Income tax provisions for interim periods are based on estimated annual income tax rates, adjusted to reflect the effects of any significant infrequent or unusual items which are required to be discretely recognized within the current interim period.  The Company’s intention is to permanently reinvest its foreign earnings outside the United States.  As a result, the effective tax rates in the periods presented are largely based upon the projected annual pre-tax earnings by jurisdiction and the allocation of certain expenses in various taxing jurisdictions where the Company conducts its business. These taxing jurisdictions apply a broad range of statutory income tax rates.

The income tax expense and benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were higher than the amount derived by applying the federal statutory tax rate of 35% primarily due to the impact of state taxes. The tax rate is also impacted by discrete items that may occur in any given period.

                The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income taxes as well as income taxes in multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company's 2013, 2012, and 2011 U.S. federal income tax returns are

13


Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)




currently under examination. State jurisdictions have various open tax years.  The statutes of limitations for most states range from three to six years.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, the Company wrote-off approximately $4.5 million and $2.2 million of deferred tax assets due to the expiration and exercise of shared-based awards. The additional paid-in capital was reduced by the corresponding amount.

The decrease in the Company’s deferred tax assets in the six month period ended June 30, 2016 is due primarily to the contractual revenue recognition event related to Ascension. This event reduced the deferred customer billings deferred tax asset by approximately $111.2 million during the reporting period, offset by additions to deferred customer billings during the quarter.
At December 31, 2015, the Company had deferred tax assets of $300.8 million, of which $48.2 million related to net operating loss carryforwards. The majority of these carryforwards were generated in 2013, 2014 and 2015 when the Company incurred substantial expenses related to the restatement. On February 16, 2016, the Company entered into the A&R MPSA with Ascension, effective February 16, 2016 with a term of 10 years. Pursuant to the A&R MPSA and with certain limited exceptions, the Company will become the exclusive provider of RCM services and PAS with respect to acute care services provided by the hospitals affiliated with Ascension that execute supplement agreements with the Company. At June 30, 2016, the Company believes its deferred tax assets will be realizable. Should the additional business with Ascension that the Company anticipates receiving in connection with the A&R MPSA not be as profitable as expected, such realizability assessment may change.
NOTE 10 — 8% SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
At the close of the Transaction on February 16, 2016 (as described in Note 1), the Company issued to TCP-ASC ACHI Series LLLP, a limited liability limited partnership jointly owned by Ascension Health Alliance and TowerBrook (the “Investor”): (i) 200,000 shares of Preferred Stock, for an aggregate price of $200 million, and (ii) a warrant with a term of ten years to acquire up to 60 million shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“common stock”), at an exercise price of $3.50 per share, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Warrant Agreement (“Warrant”). The Preferred Stock is immediately convertible into shares of common stock.

The Company incurred direct and incremental expenses of $21.3 million (including $14.0 million in closing fees paid to the Investor) relating to financial advisory fees, closing costs, legal expenses and other offering-related expenses in connection with the Transaction. These direct and incremental expenses reduced the carrying amount of the Preferred Stock. In connection with the issuance of the Preferred Stock, a beneficial conversion feature of $48.3 million was recognized. Since the Preferred Stock is presently convertible into common stock, this amount was subsequently accreted to the carrying amount of the Preferred Stock, and treated as a deemed preferred stock dividend in the calculation of earnings per share.

Dividend Rights

The holders of the Preferred Stock are entitled to receive cumulative dividends January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each year (dividend payment dates), commencing on April 1, 2016, at a rate equal to 8% per annum (preferred dividend) multiplied by the liquidation preference per share, initially $1,000 per share adjusted for any unpaid cumulative preferred dividends. For the first seven years after issuance, the dividends on the Preferred Stock will be paid-in-kind. In lieu of the dividend payment for the three months ended March 31, 2016, the aggregate liquidation preference on the then outstanding Preferred Stock as of March 31, 2016 was increased by $2.0 million. For the quarter ended June 30, 2016, the Company had accrued dividends of $4.0 million associated with the Preferred Stock which were paid in additional shares of Preferred Stock with an aggregate liquidation preference of $4.0 million in July. There were no cash dividends declared in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the accrued dividends that were paid in additional shares of Preferred Stock and the increase in liquidation preference of the Preferred Stock totaled $6.0 million.


14


Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)




Conversion Features

Each share of the Preferred Stock may be converted to common stock on any date at the option of the holder into the per share amount (as defined in the Certificate of Designations of the 8.00% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the "Series A COD")). Fractional shares will be rounded to the nearest whole share.


Redemption Rights

Since the redemption of the Preferred Stock is contingently or optionally redeemable and therefore not certain to occur, the Preferred Stock is not required to be classified as a liability under ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. As the Preferred Stock is redeemable at the option of the holders upon a fundamental change (as defined in the Series A COD) and is redeemable in certain circumstances upon the occurrence of an event that is not solely within the Company's control, the Company has classified the Preferred Stock in mezzanine equity on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. 

Voting Rights

Each holder of the Preferred Stock is entitled to vote with the common stock on an as-converted basis, and has full voting rights and powers equal to the voting rights and powers of the holders of common stock.

The following summarizes the Preferred Stock activity for the six months ended June 30, 2016:
 
 
Preferred Stock
 
 
Shares Issued and Outstanding
 
Carrying Value
Balance at December 31, 2015
 

 
$

Issuance of preferred stock
 
200,000

 
108,909

Beneficial conversion feature deemed dividend
 

 
48,320

Accrued dividends/increase in liquidation value
 

 
6,040

Balance at June 30, 2016
 
200,000

 
$
163,269


NOTE 11 — EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income, less any dividends, accretion or decretion, redemption or induced conversion on the Preferred Stock, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. As the Preferred Stock participates in dividends alongside the Company’s common stock (per their participating dividends), the Preferred Stock would constitute participating securities under ASC 260-10 and are applied to earnings per share using the two-class method. Under this method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to common shares and participating securities based on their respective rights to receive dividends.
Diluted net income per share is calculated using the more dilutive of the if-converted or the two-class method. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the two-class method was more dilutive and was computed by adjusting the denominator used in the basic net income per share computation by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period plus, when their effect is dilutive, incremental shares consisting of shares subject to stock options, shares issuable upon vesting of RSAs and Preferred Stock.



15


Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)






The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share available to common shareholders for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively (in thousands, except share and per share data).
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
 
(unaudited)
 
(unaudited)
Basic EPS:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
$
(40,791
)
 
$
(26,288
)
 
$
126,612

 
$
(56,733
)
Less dividends on preferred shares
(4,062
)
 

 
(54,360
)
 

Less income allocated to preferred shareholders

 

 
(27,797
)
 

Net income (loss) available/(allocated) to common shareholders - basic
$
(44,853
)
 
$
(26,288
)
 
$
44,455

 
$
(56,733
)
Diluted EPS:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
(40,791
)
 
(26,288
)
 
126,612

 
(56,733
)
Less dividends on preferred shares
(4,062
)
 

 
(54,360
)
 

Less income allocated to preferred shareholders

 

 
(27,608
)
 

Net income (loss) available/(allocated) to common shareholders - diluted
$
(44,853
)
 
$
(26,288
)
 
$
44,644

 
$
(56,733
)
Basic weighted-average common shares
99,414,066

 
95,941,077

 
98,851,934

 
95,915,255

Add: Effect of dilutive securities

 

 
1,099,460

 

Diluted weighted average common shares
99,414,066

 
95,941,077

 
99,951,394

 
95,915,255

Net income (loss) per common share (basic)
$
(0.45
)
 
$
(0.27
)
 
$
0.45

 
$
(0.59
)
Net income (loss) per common share (diluted)
$
(0.45
)
 
$
(0.27
)
 
$
0.45

 
$
(0.59
)
Because of their anti-dilutive effect, 19,584,438 and 22,883,463 common share equivalents comprised of stock options and RSAs have been excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Stock options and RSAs totaling 15,418,216 and 22,883,463 were not included in the computation of diluted income per share for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, as these options and awards were anti-dilutive.

16


Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)




NOTE 12 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings
The Company is subject to various claims, other pending and possible legal actions for product liability and other damages, and other matters arising out of the conduct of the Company’s business. On a quarterly basis, the Company reviews material legal claims against the Company. The Company accrues for the costs of such claims as appropriate and in the exercise of its judgment and experience. However, due to a lack of factual information available to the Company about a claim, or the procedural stage of a claim, it may not be possible for the Company to reasonably assess either the probability of a favorable or unfavorable outcome of the claim or to reasonably estimate the amount of loss should there be an unfavorable outcome. Therefore, for many of the claims, the Company cannot estimate a range of loss. The Company believes, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that the outcome of such claims and actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of such matters, if unfavorable, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
Other than as described below, the Company is not presently a party to any material litigation or regulatory proceeding and is not aware of any pending or threatened litigation or regulatory proceeding against the Company which, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results, financial condition or cash flows.

On May 17, 2013, the Company, along with certain of its former directors and former officers, was named as a defendant in a putative securities class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Hughes v. Accretive Health, Inc. et al.). The primary allegations, relating to its March 8, 2013 announcement that the Company would be restating its prior period financial statements, are that its public statements, including filings with the SEC, were false and/or misleading with respect to its revenue recognition and earnings prospects. On November 27, 2013, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the Company’s directors and former directors, other than Mary Tolan. On January 31, 2014, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On September 25, 2014, the Court granted the Company motion to dismiss without prejudice, however, the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint on October 23, 2014. On November 10, 2014, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. While that motion was still pending, on January 8, 2015, plaintiffs filed a motion to amend the second amended complaint, seeking to add allegations regarding the recently issued restatement. On April 22, 2015, the court granted plaintiffs’ motion to amend, and a third amended complaint was filed on May 13, 2015. The Company moved to dismiss the third amended complaint on June 3, 2015. On December 7, 2015, the parties executed a memorandum of understanding to resolve the suit for $3.9 million and filed a notice of settlement with the district court. On March 8, 2016, the district court granted preliminary approval to the settlement, and on June 28, 2016, the district court granted final approval. The settlement payment of
$3.9 million was covered by insurance.
On February 11, 2014, the Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama (Church v. Accretive Health, Inc.). The primary allegation is that the Company attempted to collect debts without providing the notice required by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"). On November 24, 2015, the district court granted the Company's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the case with prejudice. Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on December 21, 2015. The appeal was decided July 6, 2016, and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of the case with prejudice, finding that the Company is not a debt collector as defined in the FDCPA.
On July 22, 2014, the Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Anger v. Accretive Health, Inc.). The primary allegations are that the Company attempted to collect debts without providing the notice required by the FDCPA and Michigan Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and failed to abide by the terms of an agreed payment plan in violation of those same statutes. On August 27, 2015, the Court granted in part and denied in part the Company’s motion to dismiss. An amended complaint was filed on November 30, 2015. Discovery is underway, but on July 15, 2016, the court

17


Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)




postponed all deadlines in the case as the parties attempt to finalize a confidential agreement in principle to settle the case. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses and intends to vigorously defend itself against these claims, if the settlement in principle is not finalized.
In April 2015, the Company was named among other defendants in an employment action brought by a former employee before the Maine Human Rights Commission ("MHRC"), alleging that she was improperly terminated in retaliation for uncovering alleged Medicare fraud.  The Company filed its response with the MHRC on May 19, 2015 seeking that the Company be dismissed entirely from the action.  On June 23, 2015, the MHRC issued its Notice of Right to Sue and decision to terminate its process with respect to all charges asserted by the former employee. The Plaintiff has filed a parallel qui tam action in the District of Maine (Worthy v. Eastern Maine Healthcare Systems) in which she makes the same allegations.  The U.S. Department of Justice declined to intervene in the federal court action, and the case was unsealed in April 2015. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint on March 21, 2016. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to both the employment law-related retaliation claim for which the MHRC has granted the Notice of Right to Sue letter and the federal qui tam case, and intends to vigorously defend itself against these claims. The outcomes are not presently determinable.
On June 17, 2015, the Company filed a confidential arbitration demand with the American Arbitration Association against Salem Hospital for unpaid fees due under the parties’ Accretive Health Services Agreement in an aggregate amount of $9.3 million. On July 31, 2015, Salem Hospital filed its answer, in which it denied the Company’s claims and asserted counterclaims against the Company in the amount of $2.7 million.  The outcome is not presently determinable.

In May 2016, the Company was served with a False Claims Act case brought by Cherry Graziosi, a former emergency department service associate who worked at a hospital of one of the Company’s customers, MedStar Inc.’s Washington Hospital Center (“WHC”), along with WHC and three other hospitals that were PAS clients and a place holder, John Doe hospital, representing all PAS clients.  The Second Amended Complaint alleges that the Company’s PAS business violates the federal False Claims Act. The case was originally filed under seal in 2013 in the Federal District Court in Chicago, was presented to the U.S. Attorney in Chicago twice, and the U.S. Attorneys declined to intervene. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on July 29, 2016. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to all claims in the case, and intends to vigorously defend itself against these claims. The outcome is not presently determinable.
NOTE 13 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
As a result of the closing of the Transaction on February 16, 2016 and Ascension's ownership interest in the Investor, Ascension became a related party to the Company. See Note 10, 8% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, for additional information.
The Company provides RCM services to Ascension. The execution of the A&R MPSA, as discussed in Note 1, was a contractual settlement agreement of the prior Master Professional Services Agreement between the Company and Ascension. Therefore, the Company recorded revenue of $343.4 million in connection with these services for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. At June 30, 2016, the Company had $141.1 million in current portion of customer liabilities for a related party, consisting of $25.7 million in current accrued service costs, $8.0 million in current customer deposits and $107.4 million in current deferred customer billings. In addition, at June 30, 2016, the Company had $26.6 million in non-current portion of customer liabilities due to such related party.
As Ascension is the Company's largest customer, a significant percentage of the Company's cost of services is associated with providing services to Ascension. However, due to the nature of the Company's shared services and information technology operations, it is impractical to assign the dollar amount associated with services provided to Ascension.

18


Accretive Health, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) — (Continued)




NOTE 14 — DEFERRED CONTRACT COSTS
Eligible, one-time, nonrecurring costs associated with the initial phases of the Ascension A&R MPSA and with the transition of additional Ascension hospitals are deferred and subsequently amortized. The costs related to transition or setup activities for personnel, process, and systems are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected period of benefit. At June 30, 2016, the Company had $0.9 million in deferred eligible costs and did not have any eligible costs deferred at December 31, 2015. These deferred costs are included in other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Any contracts entered into by the Company having similar characteristics will be accounted for in a similar manner.
NOTE 15 — SEGMENTS AND CUSTOMER CONCENTRATIONS
The Company has determined that it has a single operating segment in accordance with how its business activities are managed and evaluated. All of the Company’s significant operations are organized around the single business of providing end-to-end management services of revenue cycle operations for U.S.-based hospitals and other medical providers. Accordingly, for purposes of segment disclosures, the Company has only one reporting segment. All of the Company’s net services revenue and trade accounts receivable are derived from healthcare providers domiciled in the United States.
Hospital systems affiliated with Ascension have accounted for a significant portion of the Company’s net services revenue each year since the Company’s formation. The Company did not have any revenue associated with Ascension for the three months ended June 30, 2016. For the three months ended June 30, 2016, two different customers, unaffiliated with Ascension, accounted for 35% of the Company's total net services revenue. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, net services revenue from hospitals affiliated with Ascension accounted for 95% of the Company's total net services revenue. The Company did not have any revenue associated with Ascension for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. For the three months and six months ended June, 30, 2015, four different customers, unaffiliated with Ascension, accounted for 74% and 62% of the Company's total net services revenue, respectively. The Ascension system, through its individual customer contracts with the Company, accounted for 48% and 75% of the Company’s total deferred customer billings at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The loss of customers within the Ascension health system would have a material adverse impact on the Company’s operations.
The Company does not have a concentration of credit risk within accounts receivable as reported in the consolidated balance sheets with any one large customer at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

19





ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Unless the context indicates otherwise, references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “Accretive Health,” “the Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” mean Accretive Health, Inc., and its subsidiaries.
The following discussion and analysis is an integral part of understanding our financial results and is provided as an addition to, and should be read in connection with, our condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Also refer to Note 1 of our condensed consolidated financial statements.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws, that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These statements are often identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “would” and similar expressions or variations. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results and the timing of certain events to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors,” in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and elsewhere in this Report, as well as those set forth in Part I, Item 1A of the 2015 10-K as well as our other filings with the SEC. The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q represent our views as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Subsequent events and developments may cause our views to change. While we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we have no current intention of doing so except to the extent required by applicable law. You should, therefore, not rely on these forward-looking statements as representing our views as of any date subsequent to the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
OVERVIEW
Our Business
We are a leading provider of services that help healthcare providers generate sustainable improvements in their operating margins and cash flows while also improving patient, physician and staff satisfaction for our customers. Our goal is to help our healthcare provider customers deliver high-quality care and serve their communities, and do so in a financially sustainable way. We help our customers more efficiently manage their revenue cycle process and strive to help prepare them for the evolving dynamics of the healthcare industry, particularly the challenges and opportunities presented by the shift to value-based reimbursement which is designed to reward the value, rather than the volume, of healthcare services provided.
While we cannot control the changes in the regulatory environment imposed on our customers, we believe that our role becomes increasingly more important to our customers as macroeconomic, regulatory and healthcare industry conditions continue to impose financial pressure on healthcare providers to manage their operations effectively and efficiently.
RCM continues to be our primary service offering. Our RCM offering helps our customers more efficiently manage their revenue cycle process. This encompasses patient registration, insurance and benefit verification, medical treatment documentation and coding, bill preparation and collections. We focus on optimizing our customers’ entire, end-to-end revenue cycle process, which we believe is more advantageous than alternative approaches that merely focus on certain aspects or sub-processes within the revenue cycle. Our PAS offering complements our RCM offering by strengthening our customers' compliance with certain third-party payer requirements and limiting denials of claims. For example, our PAS offering helps customers determine whether to classify a hospital visit as an in-patient or an out-patient observation case for billing purposes. Additionally, we believe that we can leverage our RCM capabilities to help providers navigate and optimize their performance within value-based payment models, and that we are well positioned to help our clients adapt to evolving value-based reimbursement structures.   
We operate our business as a single segment configured with our significant operations and offerings organized around the business of providing end-to-end RCM services to U.S.-based hospitals and other healthcare providers.



20




Business Update
In December 2015, we announced the Transaction with Ascension Health Alliance and TowerBrook, which closed on February 16, 2016. As part of the Transaction, we entered into the A&R MPSA with Ascension, effective February 16, 2016 with a term of ten years. Pursuant to the A&R MPSA and with certain limited exceptions, we will become the exclusive provider of RCM services and PAS with respect to acute care services provided by the hospitals affiliated with Ascension that execute supplement agreements with us.
We expect the Transaction to expand our relationship with Ascension, grow our overall business, and improve our ability to win customers outside of the Ascension hospital base. Under the A&R MPSA, our RCM services for both Ascension hospitals that we currently service and Ascension hospitals that we intend to service will be transitioning to an outsourced business model, whereby a significant number of Ascension's revenue cycle employees will become our employees as we begin implementing the A&R MPSA and providing our services to Ascension hospitals over a three year period. As a result of the implementation of an outsourced business model in connection with the A&R MPSA, we expect to expand our operations in the United States and off shore and intend to invest in technology, facilities and talent to support our anticipated growth. Such outsourced business model will also require the transition of the non-payroll related expenses supporting Ascension's revenue cycle operations to direct expenses of Accretive Health. These transitioned expenses have historically been managed by our infused management staff but remained on the hospitals’ financial records. This new in-house capability of managing these expenses will allow us to pursue new business opportunities which require an outsourced business model. We believe the ten year term of the A&R MPSA, together with the significant investment in Accretive Health by Ascension, our largest customer, will provide our business with stability and growth. In addition, our management team will benefit from the oversight provided by having TowerBrook involved as a strategic investor.

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table provides consolidated operating results and other operating data for the periods indicated (unaudited):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
2016 vs. 2015
Change
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2016 vs. 2015
Change
 
2016
 
2015
 
Amount
 
%
 
2016
 
2015
 
Amount
 
%
 
(In thousands except percentages)
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RCM services: net operating fees
$
2,608

 
$
9,560

 
$
(6,952
)
 
(72.7
)%
 
$
251,309

 
$
13,170

 
$
238,139

 
fav.

RCM services: incentive fees

 
6,105

 
(6,105
)
 
(100.0
)%
 
97,999

 
8,005

 
89,994

 
fav.

RCM services: other
2,061

 
2,958

 
(897
)
 
(30.3
)%
 
4,462

 
4,092

 
370

 
9.0
 %
Other service fees
4,003

 
3,462

 
541

 
15.6
 %
 
7,095

 
7,789

 
(694
)
 
(8.9
)%
Total net services revenue
8,672

 
22,085

 
(13,413
)
 
(60.7
)%
 
360,865

 
33,056

 
327,809

 
fav.

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
Cost of services
45,112

 
42,762

 
2,350

 
5.5
 %
 
90,242

 
84,958

 
5,284

 
6.2
 %
Selling, general and administrative
24,660

 
20,969

 
3,691

 
17.6
 %
 
42,196

 
38,331

 
3,865

 
10.1
 %
Other
8,651

 
611

 
8,040

 
unfav.

 
19,457

 
1,886

 
17,571

 
fav.

Total operating expenses
78,423

 
64,342

 
14,081

 
21.9
 %
 
151,895

 
125,175

 
26,720

 
21.3
 %
Income (loss) from operations
(69,751
)
 
(42,257
)
 
(27,494
)
 
65.1
 %
 
208,970

 
(92,119
)
 
301,089

 
fav.

Net interest income
46

 
69

 
(23
)
 
(33.3
)%
 
130

 
74

 
56

 
75.7
 %
Net income (loss) before income tax provision
(69,705
)
 
(42,188
)
 
(27,517
)
 
65.2
 %
 
209,100

 
(92,045
)
 
301,145

 
fav.

Income tax provision (benefit)
(28,914
)
 
(15,900
)
 
(13,014
)
 
81.8
 %
 
82,488

 
(35,312
)
 
117,800

 
unfav.

Net income (loss)
$
(40,791
)
 
$
(26,288
)
 
$
(14,503
)
 
unfav.

 
126,612

 
(56,733
)
 
183,345

 
fav.

fav. - Favorable
unfav. - Unfavorable

21




Use of Non-GAAP Financial Information
We typically invoice customers for base fees and incentive fees on a quarterly or monthly basis, and typically receive cash from customers on a similar basis. For GAAP reporting purposes, we only recognize these net operating fees and incentive fees as net services revenue to the extent that all the criteria for revenue recognition are met, which is generally upon contract renewal, termination or other contractual agreement. As such, net operating and incentive fees are typically recognized for GAAP purposes in periods subsequent to the periods in which the services are provided. Therefore, our net services revenue and other items in our GAAP consolidated financial statements and adjusted EBITDA will typically include the effects of billings and collections from periods prior to the period in which revenue is recognized.
In order to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the information used by our management team in financial and operational decision-making, we supplement our GAAP consolidated financial statements with the following non-GAAP financial measures: gross and net cash generated from customer contracting activities, and adjusted EBITDA.
Our Board and management team use these non-GAAP measures as (i) one of the primary methods for planning and forecasting overall expectations and for evaluating actual results against such expectations; and (ii) as a performance evaluation metric in determining achievement of certain executive incentive compensation programs, as well as for incentive compensation plans for employees.
Selected Non-GAAP Measures
The following table presents selected non-GAAP measures for each of the periods indicated. See below for an explanation of how we calculate and use these non-GAAP measures, and for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP measure.
 
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Non-GAAP Measures:
(in thousands)
 
(in thousands)
Adjusted EBITDA
$
(46,954
)
 
$
(31,738
)
 
$
251,742

 
$
(73,412
)
Net cash generated from customer contracting activities
$
(17,352
)
 
$
(6,605
)
 
$
(29,995
)
 
$
(4,352
)
Gross cash generated from customer contracting activities
$
38,274

 
$
47,218

 
$
79,128

 
$
102,116

Gross and Net Cash Generated from Customer Contracting Activities
Gross and net cash generated from customer contracting activities reflect the change in the deferred customer billings, relative to GAAP net services revenue, and adjusted EBITDA (defined below), respectively. Deferred customer billings include the portion of both (i) invoiced or accrued net operating fees and (ii) cash collections of incentive fees, in each case, that have not met our revenue recognition criteria. Deferred customer billings are included in the detail of our customer liabilities balance in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Deferred customer billings are reduced by the amounts of revenue recognized when a revenue recognition event occurs. Gross cash generated from customer contracting activities is defined as GAAP net services revenue, plus the change in deferred customer billings. Accordingly, gross cash generated from customer contracting activities is the sum of (i) invoiced or accrued net operating fees, (ii) cash collections on incentive fees and (iii) other services fees.
Net cash generated from customer contracting activities is defined as adjusted EBITDA, plus the change in deferred customer billings.
These non-GAAP measures are used throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q including in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

22




Gross and net cash generated from customer contracting activities include invoices issued to customers that may remain uncollected or may be subject to credits, and cash collected may be returned to our customers in the form of concessions or other adjustments. Customer concessions and other adjustments have occurred in the past and we cannot determine the likelihood that they will again occur in the future.
Adjusted EBITDA
We define adjusted EBITDA as net income before net interest income, income tax provision, depreciation and amortization expense, share-based compensation expense, reorganization-related expense and certain other items. The use of adjusted EBITDA to measure operating and financial performance is limited by our revenue recognition criteria, pursuant to which GAAP net services revenue is recognized at the end of a contract or "other contractual agreement event". Adjusted EBITDA does not adequately match corresponding cash flows resulting from customer contracting activities. Accordingly, as described above, in order to better compare our cash flows from customer contracting activities to our operating performance, we use additional non-GAAP measures: gross and net cash generated from customer contracting activities. We use adjusted EBITDA in our reconciliation of net cash generated from customer contracting activities to our GAAP consolidated financial statements.
We understand that, although non-GAAP measures are frequently used by investors, securities analysts, and others in their evaluation of companies, these measures have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider them in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results of operations as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
 Gross and net cash generated from customer contracting activities include invoiced or accrued net operating fees, and invoiced as well as collected incentive fees which may be subject to adjustment or concession prior to the end of a contract or "other contractual agreement event";
Gross and net cash generated from customer contracting activities include progress billings on incentive fees that have been collected for a number of our RCM contracts. These progress billings have, from time-to-time, been subject to adjustments, and the fees included in these non-GAAP measures may be subject to adjustments in the future;
Net cash generated from customer contracting activities and adjusted EBITDA do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
Net cash generated from customer contracting activities and adjusted EBITDA do not reflect share-based compensation expense;
Net cash generated from customer contracting activities and adjusted EBITDA do not reflect income tax expenses or cash requirements to pay taxes;
Although depreciation and amortization charges are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and net cash generated from customer contracting activities and adjusted EBITDA do not reflect cash requirements for such replacements or other purchase commitments, including lease commitments; and
Other companies in our industry may calculate gross or net cash generated from customer contracting activities or adjusted EBITDA differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.

23




Reconciliation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Measures
The following table represents a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA and gross and net cash generated from customer contracting activities to net income (loss), the most comparable GAAP measure, for each of the periods indicated (in thousands, except percentages).  
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
2016 vs. 2015 Change
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2016 vs. 2015 Change
 
2016
 
2015
 
Amount
 
%
 
2016
 
2015
 
Amount
 
%
Net income (loss)
$
(40,791
)
 
$
(26,288
)
 
$
(14,503
)
 
unfav.

 
$
126,612

 
$
(56,733
)
 
$
183,345

 
fav.

Net interest income
(46
)
 
(69
)
 
23

 
(33.3
)%
 
(130
)
 
(74
)
 
(56
)
 
75.7
 %
Income tax provision (benefit)
(28,914
)
 
(15,900
)
 
(13,014
)
 
81.8
 %
 
82,488

 
(35,312
)
 
117,800

 
unfav.

Depreciation and amortization expense
2,361

 
2,101

 
260

 
12.4
 %
 
4,632

 
3,818

 
814

 
21.3
 %
Share-based compensation expense (1)
11,785

 
7,807

 
3,978

 
51.0
 %
 
18,683

 
13,003

 
5,680

 
43.7
 %
Other (2)
8,651

 
611

 
8,040

 
unfav.

 
19,457

 
1,886

 
17,571

 
unfav.

Adjusted EBITDA
(46,954
)
 
(31,738
)
 
(15,216
)
 
47.9
 %
 
251,742

 
(73,412
)
 
325,154

 
fav.

Change in deferred customer billings (3)
29,602

 
25,133

 
4,469

 
17.8
 %
 
(281,737
)
 
69,060

 
(350,797
)
 
fav.

Net cash generated from customer contracting activities
$
(17,352
)
 
$
(6,605
)
 
$
(10,747
)
 
unfav.

 
$
(29,995
)
 
$
(4,352
)
 
$
(25,643
)
 
unfav.

Net services revenue (GAAP basis)
$
8,672

 
22,085

 
$
(13,413
)
 
(60.7
)%
 
$
360,865

 
33,056

 
327,809

 
fav.

Change in deferred customer billings (3)
29,602

 
25,133

 
4,469

 
17.8
 %
 
(281,737
)
 
69,060

 
(350,797
)
 
fav.

Gross cash generated from customer contracting activities
$
38,274

 
$
47,218

 
$
(8,944
)
 
(18.9
)%
 
$
79,128

 
$
102,116

 
$
(22,988
)
 
(22.5
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Components of Gross Cash Generated from Customer Contracting Activities:
 
 
 
 
RCM services: net operating fees
$
23,886

 
$
27,050

 
$
(3,164
)
 
(11.7
)%
 
$
48,690

 
$
57,239

 
$
(8,549
)
 
(14.9
)%
RCM services: incentive fees
7,368

 
14,511

 
(7,143
)
 
(49.2
)%
 
16,235

 
32,642

 
(16,407
)
 
(50.3
)%
RCM services: other
3,016

 
2,196

 
820

 
37.3
 %
 
7,108

 
4,447

 
2,661

 
59.8
 %
Total RCM service fees
34,270

 
43,757

 
$
(9,487
)
 
(21.7
)%
 
72,033

 
94,328

 
(22,295
)
 
(23.6
)%
Other service fees
4,004

 
3,461

 
543

 
15.7
 %
 
7,095

 
7,788

 
(693
)
 
(8.9
)%
Gross cash generated from customer contracting activities
$
38,274

 
$
47,218

 
$
(8,944
)
 
(18.9
)%
 
$
79,128

 
$
102,116

 
$
(22,988
)
 
(22.5
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
fav. - Favorable
unfav. - Unfavorable
(1)
Share-based compensation expense represents the expense associated with stock options and restricted shares granted, as reflected in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income(Loss). $1.8 million of non-cash expense related to share-based compensation expense for the acceleration of existing RSAs for employees affected by the Company's June restructuring and is included in Other. See Note 7, Share-Based Compensation, to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the detail of the amounts of share-based compensation expense.

(2)
Other costs are comprised of reorganization-related, restatement-related and certain other costs. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, we incurred other costs of $3.2 million and $13.3 million, respectively. The costs incurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 primarily related to the incentive payments and legal fees paid in connection with the closing of the Transaction with Ascension Health Alliance and TowerBrook on

24




February 16, 2016. In addition, we recorded an accrual of $0.9 million to account for expected additional contributions to our defined contribution plan for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, we incurred other costs of $0.6 million and $1.9 million, respectively, primarily in restatement-related costs related to professional service fees. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2016, we initiated a restructuring plan consisting of reductions in workforce which resulted in reorganization-related costs of $4.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. In addition for the six months ended June 30, 2016, we incurred restructuring charges related to facilities of $0.7 million. The reorganization-related costs for the three months ended June 30, 2016 consisted of $2.8 million in severance and employee benefits and related expenses and $1.8 million of non-cash expense related to share-based compensation expense for the acceleration of existing RSAs for affected employees. We did not incur any reorganization-related costs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015.

(3)
Deferred customer billings include the portion of both (i) invoiced or accrued net operating fees and (ii) cash collections on incentive fees, in each case, that have not met our revenue recognition criteria. Deferred customer billings are included in the detail of our customer liabilities account in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Deferred customer billings are reduced by revenue recognized when revenue recognition occurs. Change in deferred customer billings represents the net change in the cumulative net operating fees and incentive fees that have not met revenue recognition criteria.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Net Services Revenue
Net services revenue decreased by $13.4 million, to $8.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from $22.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in RCM contractual agreement events of $12.0 million, from $12.0 million in RCM net services revenue recognized for the three months ended June 30, 2015, compared to no contractual agreement events for the three months ended June 30, 2016. This decrease was offset by an increase of $0.5 million in other service fees revenue to $4.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $3.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015, primarily driven by an increase in PAS revenue.
Gross Cash Generated from Customer Contracting Activities (Non-GAAP)
Gross cash generated from customer contracting activities decreased by $8.9 million, or 18.9%, to $38.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from $47.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease in gross cash generated was primarily driven by the RCM business, with $8.1 million of the decrease attributable to movement toward fixed fee contracts and a reduction in the scope of services for certain customers and $1.9 million of the decrease due to customer attrition primarily attributable to client M&A activity. The decrease from the RCM business was partially offset by an increase in other service fees driven by a $0.7 million increase in PAS revenue. For an explanation of how we calculate gross cash generated from customer contracting activities, refer to the “Reconciliation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Measures” above.
Costs of Services
Costs of services increased by $2.4 million, or 5.5%, to $45.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from $42.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The increase in costs of services was primarily attributable to increased technology expenditures, expansion in our shared services centers and costs relating to implementation of International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition ("ICD-10"), a clinical cataloging system that went into effect for the U.S. healthcare industry on October 1, 2015.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $3.7 million, or 17.6%, to $24.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from $21.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was primarily due to severance costs of $3.0 million relating to our former Chief Executive Officer and the increase of share-based compensation expense of $3.7 million primarily due to the accelerated vesting of share-based awards

25




previously granted to our former Chief Executive Officer and former Chief Financial Officer. This increase was offset by a decrease in other expenses primarily due to cost reduction initiatives.
Net Cash Generated from Customer Contracting Activities (Non-GAAP)
Net cash generated from customer contracting activities was negative $17.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to negative $6.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. This decrease of $10.7 million was primarily due to a decrease in gross cash generated from customer contracting activities and an increase in cost of services as explained above. For an explanation of how we calculate net cash generated from customer contracting activities, refer to "Reconciliation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Measures" above.
Other
Other costs increased by $8.0 million, to $8.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was primarily attributable to $3.2 million in costs related to incentive payments and legal fees paid in connection with the closing of the Transaction with Ascension Health Alliance and TowerBrook on February 16, 2016 and $4.6 million in reorganization-related costs in the three months ended June 30, 2016. These reorganization-related costs consisted of $2.8 million in severance and employee benefits and related expenses and $1.8 million of non-cash expense related to share based compensation expense for the acceleration of existing RSAs for affected employees. In addition, the increase was also attributable to the recording of a $0.9 million accrual to account for expected additional contributions to our defined contribution plan.

Income Taxes
Our tax benefit increased by $13.0 million to a tax benefit of $28.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, from a benefit of $15.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015, primarily due to a decrease in pretax income. Our effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was 41.5% and 37.7%, respectively. Our tax rate is affected by changes in state tax rates and discrete items that may occur in any given period but not consistent from year to year.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Net Services Revenue
Net services revenue increased by $327.8 million to $360.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from $33.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was primarily driven by a contractual agreement event related to Ascension during the quarter ended March 31, 2016, resulting in revenue recognition of $343.4 million in net services revenue, partially offset by the recognition of contractual agreement events during the six months ended June 30, 2015.
Gross Cash Generated from Customer Contracting Activities (Non-GAAP)
Gross cash generated from customer contracting activities totaled $79.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $102.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, a decrease of $23.0 million. The decrease in gross cash generated was primarily driven by the RCM business, with $16.2 million of the decrease attributable to movement toward fixed fee contracts and a reduction in the scope of services for certain customers and $6.2 million of the decrease due to customer attrition primarily attributable to client M&A activity. For an explanation of how we calculate gross cash generated from customer contracting activities, refer to the “Reconciliation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Measures” above.



26




Costs of Services
Costs of services increased by $5.3 million, or 6.2%, to $90.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from $85.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase in cost of services was primarily attributable to increased technology expenditures, expansion in our shared services centers and costs relating to implementation of ICD-10.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $3.9 million, or 10.1%, to $42.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from $38.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was primarily due to severance costs of $3.0 million relating to our former Chief Executive Officer and the increase of share-based compensation expense of $4.7 million primarily due to the accelerated vesting of share-based awards previously granted to our former Chief Executive Officer and former Chief Financial Officer This increase was offset by a decrease in other expenses primarily due to cost reduction initiatives.
Net Cash Generated from Customer Contracting Activities (Non-GAAP)
Net cash generated from customer contracting activities totaled a use of $30.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to a use of $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. This change of $25.6 million was primarily due to a decrease in gross cash generated and an increase in cost of services. For an explanation of how we calculate net cash generated from customer contracting activities, refer to the "Reconciliation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Measures" above.
Other
Other costs increased by $17.6 million to $19.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was primarily attributable to $13.3 million in costs related to incentive payments and legal fees paid in connection with the closing of the Transaction with Ascension Health Alliance and TowerBrook on February 16, 2016 and $5.3 million in reorganization-related costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2016. These reorganization-related costs primarily consisted of $2.8 million in severance and employee benefits and related expenses and $1.8 million of non-cash expense related to share based compensation expense for the acceleration of existing RSAs for affected employees. In addition, the increase was also attributable to the recording of a $0.9 million accrual to account for expected additional contributions to our defined contribution plan.
Income Taxes
Tax expense increased by $117.8 million to a tax expense of $82.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, from a tax benefit of $35.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, primarily due to an increase in pretax income. Our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was 39.5% and 38.4%, respectively. Our tax rate is affected by discrete items that may occur in any given year, but not consistent from year to year.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Management considers an accounting policy to be critical if the accounting policy requires management to make particularly difficult, subjective or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. A summary of our critical accounting policies is included in Part II, Item 7 "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates" of our 2015 10-K. There have been no material changes to the critical accounting policies disclosed in our 2015 10-K.

27




NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
For additional information regarding new accounting guidance, see Note 2, Recent Accounting Pronouncements, to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which provides a summary of our recently adopted accounting standards and disclosures.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
On February 16, 2016, in connection with the Transaction, the Investor invested $200 million in Accretive Health in exchange for the Preferred Stock and the Warrant.
Our primary source of liquidity is cash flows from operations. Given our current cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable, we believe we will have sufficient funds to meet our operating, investing and financing needs for at least the next twelve months.
Our cash and cash equivalents were $221.7 million at June 30, 2016 as compared to $103.5 million as of December 31, 2015. Our cash and cash equivalents, at any time, include amounts paid to us in advance by customers for the purpose of reimbursing their revenue cycle operation costs. See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2015 10-K.
Cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities, as reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, are summarized in the following table (in thousands):
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
Cash Flows
2016
 
2015
Net cash provided by (used in):
 

 
 

Operating activities
$
(52,532
)
 
$
(19,183
)
Investing activities
(6,074
)
 
(8,348
)
Financing activities
176,788

 
4,483

Operating Activities
Cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2016 totaled $52.5 million, as compared to cash used of $19.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase in cash used in operating activities was primarily attributable to the $16.3 million payment of accrued services costs and customer deposits. In addition, the increase in cash used was due to an increase in other costs of $13.3 million, primarily related to the incentive payments and legal fees paid in connection with the closing of the Transaction with Ascension Health Alliance and TowerBrook on February 16, 2016.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities decreased by $2.3 million, from $8.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, to $6.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was primarily attributable to the purchase of computer hardware and software, as well as for additional leasehold improvements related to the build out of a new shared service center to support the growth of our business. Cash used was offset by cash provided of $1.0 million from proceeds received from the maturation of short-term investments.
Financing Activities

28




Cash provided by financing activities increased to $176.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, primarily due to investment of $200 million by the Investor offset by issuance costs of $21.3 million.
Future Capital Requirements
In connection with our strategic initiatives, we plan to continue to enhance customer service by increasing our investment in technology to enable our systems to more effectively integrate with our customers’ existing technologies. We plan to continue to deploy resources to strengthen our information technology infrastructure in order to drive additional value for our customers. We also continue to invest in our shared services capabilities. We also plan on expanding our capabilities in India which will require investments. We may also selectively pursue acquisitions and/or strategic relationships that will enable us to broaden or further enhance our offerings.
Additionally, new business development remains a priority as we plan to continue to boost our sales and marketing efforts. We plan to continue to add experienced personnel to our sales organization, develop more disciplined sales processes, and create an integrated marketing capability.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET OBLIGATIONS
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Sensitivity
    
Our interest income is primarily generated from interest earned on operating cash accounts. We do not enter into interest rate swaps, caps or collars or other hedging instruments. As a result, we believe that the risk of a significant impact on our operating income from interest rate fluctuations is not substantial.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
    
Our results of operations and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Indian Rupee because a portion of our operating expenses are incurred by our subsidiary in India and are denominated in Indian Rupees. However, we do not generate any revenues outside of the United States. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, 7.8% and 7.6%, respectively, of our expenses were denominated in Indian Rupees. As a result, we believe that the risk of a significant impact on our operating income from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations is not substantial.
ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
In connection with the preparation of this report, our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2016. Based on our identification of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting described in “Item 9A - Control and Procedures” in our 2015 10-K, our

29




Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.
During the first half of 2015, we spent considerable time, and deployed considerable resources, in redesigning our internal controls over financial reporting. Significant effort was expended in the second half of 2015 implementing and executing the new controls. In light of the above timeline, we are unable to demonstrate the sustainability of the controls we have implemented and are therefore unable to conclude that we have remediated our material weaknesses; however, we continue to invest significant time and resources and take actions to remediate material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.

While our remediation efforts continue, we have relied on and will continue to rely on extensive, temporary manual procedures and other measures as needed to assist us with meeting the objectives otherwise fulfilled by an effective internal control environment. These procedures include, but are not limited to:

Execution of a more thorough and repeatable financial statement close process, thereby allowing us to conduct additional analysis and substantive procedures, including preparation of account reconciliations and making additional adjustments as necessary to verify the accuracy and completeness of our financial reporting; and

Hiring additional resources with relevant accounting experience, skills and knowledge, working under our supervision and direction to assist with our remediation efforts.

Notwithstanding the existence of the material weaknesses as described in our 2015 10-K, we believe that the consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates, and for the periods, presented, in conformity with GAAP.
Remediation of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is committed to the planning and implementation of remediation efforts to address all material weaknesses as well as other identified areas of risk. These remediation efforts, summarized below, which are implemented, in the process of being implemented or are planned for implementation, are intended to address the identified material weaknesses and to enhance our overall financial control environment.

During 2014 and 2015, numerous changes were made throughout our organization and significant actions have been undertaken to reinforce the significance of a strong control environment, including training and other steps designed to strengthen and enhance our control culture.

To remediate the control environment deficiencies identified herein, our leadership team, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, has reaffirmed and reemphasized the importance of internal control, control consciousness and a strong control environment. In addition, we have developed and implemented a remediation plan to address the material weakness.

Our plan included the following actions:
adopted new accounting policies for revenue recognition and software capitalization;
implemented periodic reviews with the relevant internal process owners of tangible and intangible asset acquisitions and dispositions to ensure proper accounting;
established a contract governance committee to oversee all contracting activity;
completed the implementation of a more robust contract governance structure to assure appropriate administration, compliance and accounting treatment for new or amended contract terms;

30




established a contracting boundaries protocol to clarify the delegation of contracting authority to personnel involved in establishing customer contract terms;
appointed experienced professionals to key leadership positions;
established a new reporting structure with more clearly defined accountabilities;
hired additional accounting personnel with appropriate backgrounds and skill sets, including professionals with certified public accountant qualifications, master’s degrees and public accounting experience and created new positions for a Director of Revenue and a Director of Taxes;
implemented a new internal reporting model and performance metrics based on cash flow performance;
centralized certain accounting functions and revised organizational structures to enhance accurate reporting and ensure appropriate accountability;
established a formal delegation of authority from the Board of Directors to management with further delegation to accountable personnel;
expanded the use of our financial reporting systems to facilitate more robust analysis of operating performance, budgeting and forecasting; and
strengthened our current disclosure committee with formalized processes to enhance the transparency of our external financial reporting.
Our management believes that meaningful progress has been made against remaining remediation efforts; although timetables vary, management regards successful completion as an important priority. Remaining remediation activities that we have begun to execute against in 2016 include:
implementing and executing a year-round internal controls testing and monitoring program;
strengthening information technology general controls;
enhancing our Sarbanes-Oxley compliance procedures; and
finalizing our transition to the 2013 COSO framework.
When implemented, operational and demonstrated to be repeatable and sustainable, our management believes the measures described above will remediate the control deficiencies we have identified and strengthen our internal control over financial reporting. We are committed to improving our internal control processes and intend to continue to review and improve our financial reporting controls and procedures. As we continue to evaluate and work to improve our internal control over financial reporting, we may take additional measures to address control deficiencies or determine to modify, or in appropriate circumstances not to complete, certain of the remediation measures described above.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Other than matters discussed in this Item 4, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting since our 2015 10-K that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.




31




PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Other than as described below, the Company is not presently a party to any material litigation or regulatory proceeding and is not aware of any pending or threatened litigation or regulatory proceeding against the Company which, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results, financial condition or cash flows.
On May 17, 2013, the Company, along with certain of its former directors and former officers, was named as a defendant in a putative securities class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Hughes v. Accretive Health, Inc. et al.). The primary allegations, relating to its March 8, 2013 announcement that the Company would be restating its prior period financial statements, are that its public statements, including filings with the SEC, were false and/or misleading with respect to its revenue recognition and earnings prospects. On November 27, 2013, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the Company’s directors and former directors, other than Mary Tolan. On January 31, 2014, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On September 25, 2014, the Court granted the Company motion to dismiss without prejudice, however, the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint on October 23, 2014. On November 10, 2014, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. While that motion was still pending, on January 8, 2015, plaintiffs filed a motion to amend the second amended complaint, seeking to add allegations regarding the recently issued restatement. On April 22, 2015, the court granted plaintiffs’ motion to amend, and a third amended complaint was filed on May 13, 2015. The Company moved to dismiss the third amended complaint on June 3, 2015. On December 7, 2015, the parties executed a memorandum of understanding to resolve the suit for $3.9 million and filed a notice of settlement with the district court. On March 8, 2016, the district court granted preliminary approval to the settlement, and on June 28, 2016, the district court granted final approval. The settlement payment of $3.9 million was covered by insurance.
On February 11, 2014, the Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama (Church v. Accretive Health, Inc.). The primary allegation is that the Company attempted to collect debts without providing the notice required by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"). On November 24, 2015, the district court granted the Company's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the case with prejudice. Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on December 21, 2015. The appeal was decided July 6, 2016, and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of the case with prejudice, finding that the Company is not a debt collector as defined in the FDCPA.
On July 22, 2014, the Company was named as a defendant in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Anger v. Accretive Health, Inc.). The primary allegations are that the Company attempted to collect debts without providing the notice required by the FDCPA and Michigan Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and failed to abide by the terms of an agreed payment plan in violation of those same statutes. On August 27, 2015, the Court granted in part and denied in part the Company’s motion to dismiss. An amended complaint was filed on November 30, 2015. Discovery is underway, but on July 15, 2016, the court postponed all deadlines in the case as the parties attempt to finalize a confidential agreement in principle to settle the case. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses and intends to vigorously defend itself against these claims, if the settlement in principle is not finalized.
In April 2015, the Company was named among other defendants in an employment action brought by a former employee before the Maine Human Rights Commission ("MHRC"), alleging that she was improperly terminated in retaliation for uncovering alleged Medicare fraud.  The Company filed its response with the MHRC on May 19, 2015 seeking that the Company be dismissed entirely from the action.  On June 23, 2015, the MHRC issued its Notice of Right to Sue and decision to terminate its process with respect to all charges asserted by the former employee. The Plaintiff has filed a parallel qui tam action in the District of Maine (Worthy v. Eastern Maine Healthcare Systems) in which she makes the same allegations.  The U.S. Department of Justice declined to intervene in the federal court action, and the case was unsealed in April 2015. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the

32




Third Amended Complaint on March 21, 2016. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to both the employment law-related retaliation claim for which the MHRC has granted the Notice of Right to Sue letter and the federal qui tam case, and intends to vigorously defend itself against these claims. The outcomes are not presently determinable.
On June 17, 2015, the Company filed a confidential arbitration demand with the American Arbitration Association against Salem Hospital for unpaid fees due under the parties’ Accretive Health Services Agreement in an aggregate amount of $9.3 million. On July 31, 2015, Salem Hospital filed its answer, in which it denied the Company’s claims and asserted counterclaims against the Company in the amount of $2.7 million.  The outcome is not presently determinable.

In May 2016, the Company was served with a False Claims Act case brought by Cherry Graziosi, a former emergency department service associate who worked at a hospital of one of the Company’s customers, MedStar Inc.’s Washington Hospital Center (“WHC”), along with WHC and three other hospitals that were PAS clients and a place holder, John Doe hospital, representing all PAS clients.  The Second Amended Complaint alleges that the Company’s PAS business violates the federal False Claims Act. The case was originally filed under seal in 2013 in the Federal District Court in Chicago, was presented to the U.S. Attorney in Chicago twice, and the U.S. Attorneys declined to intervene. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on July 29, 2016. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to all claims in the case, and intends to vigorously defend itself against these claims. The outcome is not presently determinable.
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our 2015 10-K.  The risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our 2015 10-K, in addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, could materially affect our business, financial condition, or results.  Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we deem to be immaterial could also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results.
ITEM 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities
We granted options to purchase an aggregate of 28,112 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $2.53 per share. We did not issue any shares of restricted stock during the three months ended June 30, 2016 to employees and directors pursuant to our Amended and Restated 2010 Stock Incentive Plan and/or in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act as sales by an issuer not involving any public offering, as set forth in the tables below. No underwriters were involved in the foregoing transactions. All of such unregistered shares of common stock are deemed restricted securities for purposes of the Securities Act. No such options have been exercised.

The following table sets forth the dates on which such options were granted and the number of shares of
common stock subject to such options, the exercise price and the number of employees and directors granted
options on each date from April 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016:

Date of Grant
 
Common Stock Subject to Options Granted
 
Exercise Price
 
Number of
Employees and
Directors Granted
Options
4/1/2016
 
28,112

 
$
2.53

 
2




33





Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table provides information about our repurchases of common stock during the periods indicated (in thousands, except share and per share data):
Period
Number of
 Shares Purchased (1)
 
Average Price Paid per Share
 
Total Number of
 Shares Purchased
 as Part of
 Publicly
 Announced  Plans
 or Programs (2)
  
Maximum Dollar
 Value of Shares
 that May Yet be
 Purchased  Under
 Publicly
 Announced Plans
 or Programs (2)
April 1, 2016 through April 30, 2016
 
21,496

 
$
2.44

 

  
$
50,000

May 1, 2016 through May 31, 2016
 
414,028

 
$
2.30

 

 
$
50,000

June 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016
 
323,094

 
$
1.99

 

 
$
50,000

(1)
Repurchases of our common stock related to employees’ tax withholding upon vesting of RSAs. See Note 7, Share-Based Compensation, to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.    
(2)
On November 13, 2013, our board of directors announced that it authorized, subject to the completion of the restatement, the repurchase of up to $50.0 million of our common stock from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, (the"2013 Repurchase Program"). The timing and amount of any shares repurchased under the 2013 Repurchase Program will be determined by our management based on its evaluation of market conditions and other factors. The 2013 Repurchase Program may be suspended or discontinued at any time. We currently intend to fund any repurchases from cash on hand. We did not repurchase any shares of common stock under the 2013 Repurchase Program during the quarters ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

In connection with the Transaction, we issued shares of Preferred Stock and the Warrant to the Investor. This issuance and sale was exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. The Investor represented to us that it is an "accredited investor" as defined in Rule 501 of the Securities Act and that the Preferred Stock and the Warrant were being acquired for investment purposes and not with a view to, or for sale in connection with, any distribution thereof, and appropriate legends will be affixed to any certificates evidencing the shares of Preferred Stock, the Warrant or any common stock issued upon conversion thereof.

34




ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number
Exhibit Description
10.1
General Release and Mutual Non-Disparagement Agreement, dated May 25, 2016, by and between the Registrant and Emad Rizk (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (file No. 001-34746) filed on May 26, 2016)
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB
XBRL Labels Linkbase Document
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Document
101.PRE
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document



35




SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date:
August 4, 2016
ACCRETIVE HEALTH, INC.
 
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/  Joseph Flanagan
 
 
Joseph Flanagan
 
 
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/  Christopher Ricaurte
 
 
Christopher Ricaurte
 
 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
 
 
 


36