ap-def14a_20190509.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.      )

 

 

Filed by the Registrant

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

 

Definitive Additional Materials

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to 167; 240.14a-12

 

Ampco–Pittsburgh Corporation

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

 

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

No fee required.

 

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

 

 

(1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

(2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

(3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

 

(4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

 

(5) 

Total fee paid:

 

 

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1) 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

 

(2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

 

(3) 

Filing Party:

 

 

 

(4) 

Date Filed:

 


 

726 Bell Avenue, Suite 301 Carnegie, Pennsylvania 15106

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD THURSDAY, MAY 9, 2019

 

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF

AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (“Ampco” or the “Corporation”) will be held in the Carnegie Room, 3rd Floor, The Duquesne Club, 325 Sixth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 10:00 AM, Eastern Time, for the following purposes:

 

1.

to elect a class of two directors for a term that expires in 2022;

 

2.

to consider and vote on an amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock from 20,000,000 shares to 40,000,000 shares;

 

3.

to hold an advisory vote to approve our executive compensation;

 

4.

to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2019; and

 

5.

to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Shareholders of record on March 12, 2019, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.

 

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

 

 

 

Maria V. Trainor,

 

Vice President, General

Counsel and Secretary

 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

March 29, 2019

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for

the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to Be Held on May 9, 2019

The proxy statement and the annual report of the Corporation are available at

http://www.ampcopittsburgh.com/investors.html.

 

All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. Your vote is important, and, whether or not you expect to attend in person, it is requested that you PROMPTLY fill in, sign, and return the enclosed proxy card or follow the internet or telephone voting instructions included on the proxy card.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Proxy Statement

1

Proxy Summary

1

Questions and Answers Regarding the Annual Meeting

5

Solicitation of Proxies

7

Voting Securities and Record Date

8

Required Vote

8

Election of Directors (Proposal 1)

9

Nominee for Directors for a Term of Office Expiring in 2022

9

Continuing Directors Whose Term of Office Expires In 2021

9

Continuing Directors Whose Term of Office Expires In 2020

10

Corporate Governance

11

Corporate Governance Summary

11

Board Independence

12

Leadership Structure

12

Director Nominating Procedures

12

Non-Management Directors

13

Shareholder Communications with Directors

13

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

13

Director Terms

14

Annual Meeting Attendance

14

Board Committees; Director Compensation; Stock Ownership Guidelines

15

Summary

15

Audit Committee

15

Compensation Committee

16

Executive Committee

16

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

16

Director Compensation

16

Stock Ownership Guidelines

17

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

18

Beneficial Ownership of More Than Five Percent

18

Director and Executive Officer Stock Ownership

18

Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

19

Proposal to Amend Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to Increase the Number of Authorized Shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock (Proposal 2)

20

Effect of Increase in Authorized Shares

20

Purposes of The Articles Amendment Proposal

20

Potential Risks Associated with The Amendment

21

Vote Required

21

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Proposal 3)

22

Executive Compensation

23

Compensation Overview

23

Summary Compensation Table

33

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

34

Retirement Benefits

36

Potential Payments Upon Termination, Resignation or Change in Control

37

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

39

Report of The Audit Committee

39

Ratification of the Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2019 (Proposal 4)

41

Equity Compensation Plan Information

41

Shareholder Proposals for 2020

41

Other Matters

42

 

 


 

 

 

PROXY STATEMENT

March 29, 2019

Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 9, 2019

 

PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. You should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting. This proxy statement and the related proxy materials were first mailed to shareholders and made available on the internet on or about March 29, 2019.

 

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

  

 

 

 

•     Time and Date:

  

10:00 AM, Eastern Time, May 9, 2019

 

 

•     Place:

  

The Carnegie Room, 3rd Floor

The Duquesne Club

325 Sixth Avenue

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

 

 

•    Record Date

  

March 12, 2019

 

 

•    Voting

  

Only shareholders as of the record date, March 12, 2019, are entitled to vote.

Your broker will NOT be able to vote your shares with respect to any of the matters presented at the meeting other than the ratification of the selection of our independent registered public accounting firm unless you give your broker specific voting instructions.

Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting in person, please cast your vote as soon as possible by:

      Using the Internet at www.proxyvote.com;

       Calling toll-free from the United States, U.S. territories and Canada to 1-800-690-6903; or

      Mailing your signed proxy or voting instruction form.

 

 

•    Attending the Annual Meeting

  

To be admitted in person, you will be required to present a government-issued photo identification (such as a driver’s license or passport).

If you hold shares in street name, you must request a confirmation of beneficial ownership from your broker to vote in person at the meeting.

You do not need to attend the annual meeting to vote if you have properly submitted your proxy in advance of the meeting.

 

 

 

1

 


 

•    Meeting Agenda

 

1.     Election of two directors;

2.     Consideration of and voting on an amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock from 20,000,000 shares to 40,000,000 shares;

3. Non-binding, advisory vote to approve our executive compensation;

4.     Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019; and

5.  Transaction of such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

 

 

Voting Matters

 

Proposals

 

Board Recommendation

Election of Directors

 

FOR each nominee named in this proxy statement

Amendment of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock from 20,000,000 shares to 40,000,000 shares

 

FOR

Non-binding, advisory vote to approve our executive compensation

 

FOR

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019

 

FOR

 

Board Nominees

 

Name

 

Age

 

 

Director

Since

 

Occupation

 

Experience/

Qualification

 

Independent

 

Committee

Assignments

Elizabeth A. Fessenden

 

 

63

 

 

2017

 

Principal of Fessenden Associates

 

Extensive operations experience in the metals industry; many years of service as a director of companies; broad leadership experience

 

X

 

Compensation

Terry L. Dunlap

 

59

 

 

Nominated in 2019

 

Principal of Sweetwater LLC

 

Extensive operations experience in the metals industry; board service; broad leadership experience

 

X

 

Pending election, nominated to Compensation Committee

 

Ratification of the Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2019

We are requesting that shareholders ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019. The table below shows the fees paid by the Corporation to Deloitte & Touche LLP in 2018.

 

 

 

2018

 

Audit fees(a)

 

$

1,656,185

 

Audit-related fees(b)

 

$

2,028

 

Tax fees(c)

 

$

1,964

 

All other fees

 

 

 

Total

 

$

1,660,177

 

2

 


 

 

(a)

Fees for audit services primarily related to the audit of (1) the Corporation’s annual consolidated financial statements and its internal control over financial reporting and (2) statutory filings for the Corporation’s foreign subsidiaries.

(b)

Fees for audit-related services primarily related to the subscription fee for Deloitte’s Authoritative Guidance.

(c)

Fees for tax services in 2018 related to general tax consultation.

Executive Compensation Program Highlights

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain top talent by enabling the Corporation to compete effectively for the highest quality personnel and to pay for performance by aligning compensation with the achievement of both short-term and long-term financial objectives that build shareholder value.

The 2018 executive compensation program features a balanced mix of salary and performance-driven annual and long-term incentive award opportunities. In designing our executive compensation program, we have implemented programs and policies that support our commitment to good compensation governance and that create alignment between our executives and our shareholders, as highlighted below:

 

The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of independent directors. Each member of the Compensation Committee is a “non-employee director” of the Corporation, as defined under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and an “outside director” for purposes of the corporate compensation provisions contained in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

 

The Compensation Committee conducts an annual review and approval of our compensation strategies, including a review of our compensation-related risk profile to ensure that our compensation-related risks are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company.

 

In 2018, the Compensation Committee engaged Pay Governance LLC as its independent provider of compensation consulting services for decisions relating to compensation. Pay Governance was retained to identify a reasonable group of companies as a peer group to benchmark executive compensation levels and incentive plan design and to assist the Compensation Committee in fulfilling its responsibilities and duties.

 

A significant portion of each executive’s annual pay is based on objective performance metrics and, therefore, “at-risk” based on corporate performance. In addition, the equity-based portion of our executive compensation program is designed to align the interests of our executive officers and shareholders.

 

The Compensation Committee periodically reviews its compensation decisions against executive compensation at a peer group of companies comparable in terms of the primary scope metric of revenue and secondary scope metrics of market cap, assets and number of employees to ensure that our executive compensation program provides competitive compensation opportunities. The same peer group is used to determine our relative performance for vesting of a portion of performance share unit awards.

 

The equity awards granted to our executive officers vest over multi-year periods, consistent with current practice and our retention objectives.

 

We have a clawback policy applicable to executive officers pursuant to which, if the Corporation is required, because of fraud or negligence, to restate financial results for any period (the “Restatement Period”) in a manner that would have adversely affected the amount of the payout of any incentive compensation awards, the Compensation Committee has the right during the three-year period following the Restatement Period to review the matter and determine what, if any, repayment executives will be required to make.

 

We do not provide any Internal Revenue Code Section 280G excise tax gross-up rights or any other significant tax gross-up rights to our executive officers.

 

The compensation arrangements with our executive officers contain double-trigger equity acceleration provisions in the event of a change in control.

3

 


 

 

We have a policy prohibiting “underwater” options from being repriced or replaced (either with new options or other equity awards), unless approved by our shareholders.

Additional information about our compensation philosophy and program, including compensation determinations for each of our named executive officers, can be found in the “Compensation Overview” starting on page 24 in this Proxy Statement.

We encourage you to read the entire proxy statement and to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. If you are unable to attend the Annual Meeting in person, we encourage you to submit a proxy so that your shares will be represented and voted.

 

4

 


 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS REGARDING THE ANNUAL MEETING

Q: Why am I receiving these materials?

A: As a shareholder, we are providing these proxy materials to you in connection with our solicitation of proxies to be voted at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will take place on May 9, 2019. These materials were first mailed to shareholders on or about March 29, 2019. You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting, and you are requested to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement.

Q: What is included in these materials?

A: These materials include:

 

Our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting; and

 

Our 2018 Annual Report to Shareholders, which includes our audited consolidated financial statements.

These materials also include the proxy/voting instruction card for the Annual Meeting.

Q: What am I being asked to vote on?

A: You are being asked to vote on the following proposals:

 

Proposal 1 —Election of two directors;

 

Proposal 2 — Consideration and vote on an amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock from 20,000,000 shares to 40,000,000 shares (the “Articles Amendment Proposal”);

 

Proposal 3 — Non-binding, advisory vote to approve our executive compensation (the “Say-on-Pay Proposal”);

 

Proposal 4 — Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019 (the “Deloitte Ratification Proposal”); and

 

Such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Q: What are the voting recommendations of the Board of Directors?

A: The Board recommends the following votes:

 

FOR the election of the two director nominees named in this proxy statement;

 

FOR the Articles Amendment Proposal;

 

FOR the Say-on-Pay Proposal; and

 

FOR the Deloitte Ratification Proposal.

Q: Will any other matters be voted on?

A: We are not aware of any other matters that will be brought before the shareholders for a vote at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter is properly brought before the meeting, your proxy will authorize each of Michael G. McAuley and Maria Trainor (together, the “Proxies”) to vote on such matters in their discretion.

Q: How do I cast my vote?

A: If you are a shareholder of record, you may cast your vote using any of the following methods:

 

Via the Internet, by visiting the website “www.proxyvote.com” and following the instructions for Internet voting on your proxy/voting instruction card;

5

 


 

 

By dialing 1-800-690-6903 and following the instructions for telephone voting on your proxy/voting instruction card;

 

By completing and mailing your proxy/voting instruction card; or

 

By casting your vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

If you vote over the Internet, you may incur related ancillary costs, such as telephone and Internet access charges, for which you will be responsible. The telephone and Internet voting facilities for the shareholders of record of all shares will close at 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on May 8, 2019. The Internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate shareholders by use of a control number and to allow you to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.

If you vote by Internet or telephone or return your signed proxy/voting instruction card, your shares will be voted as you indicate. If you do not indicate how your shares are to be voted on a proposal, your shares will be voted, with respect to that proposal, in accordance with the voting recommendations of the Board of Directors.

If your shares are held in a brokerage account in your broker’s name (also known as “street name”), you should follow the instructions for voting provided by your broker or nominee. You may submit voting instructions by Internet or telephone or you may complete and mail a voting instruction card to your broker or nominee. If you provide specific voting instructions by telephone, Internet or mail, your broker or nominee will vote your shares as you have directed.

Ballots will be provided during the Annual Meeting to anyone who wants to vote in person at the meeting. If you hold shares in street name, you must request a confirmation of beneficial ownership from your broker to vote in person at the meeting.

Q: Can I change my vote?

A: Yes. If you are a shareholder of record, you can change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time prior to the voting thereof at the Annual Meeting by:

 

Submitting a valid, later-dated proxy/voting instruction card;

 

Submitting a valid, subsequent vote by telephone or the Internet at any time prior to 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on May 8, 2019;

 

Notifying our Secretary in writing that you have revoked your proxy; or

 

Completing a written ballot at the Annual Meeting (your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, in and of itself, revoke your prior proxy).

If your shares are held in a brokerage account in your broker’s name, you should follow the instructions for changing or revoking your vote provided by your broker or nominee.

Q: What will happen if I do not instruct my broker how to vote?

A: If your shares are held in street name and you do not instruct your broker how to vote, one of two things can happen depending on the type of proposal. Pursuant to New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, brokers have discretionary power to vote your shares on “routine” matters, but they do not have discretionary power to vote your shares on “non-routine” matters. We believe that the only proposal that will be considered routine under NYSE rules is the Deloitte Ratification Proposal, which means that your broker may vote your shares in its discretion on that proposal. This is known as “broker discretionary voting.”

The election of directors, the Articles Amendment Proposal and the Say-on-Pay Proposal are considered non-routine matters. Accordingly, your broker may not vote your shares with respect to these matters if you have not provided instructions. This is called a “broker non-vote.”

We strongly encourage you to submit your proxy and exercise your right to vote as a shareholder.

6

 


 

Q: How many shares must be present to conduct business at the Annual Meeting?

A: Holders of at least a majority of the votes that all shareholders are entitled to cast at the Annual Meeting must be represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting in order to conduct business. This is called a quorum. If you vote, your shares will be part of the quorum. Abstentions, “Withheld” votes and broker non-votes also will be counted in determining whether a quorum exists.

Q: What vote is required to approve the proposals?

A: In the election of directors, the nominees who receive the most votes for the available positions will be elected. If you withhold authority to vote for a particular nominee, your vote will not count either “FOR” or “AGAINST” the nominee. Abstentions are not counted in the election of directors, and neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will affect the outcome.

Since all members of the Board of Directors have voted “FOR” the Articles Amendment Proposal, the approval by the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares, voting together as a single class, is required to adopt the Articles Amendment Proposal.  Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the Articles Amendment Proposal.

The Say-on-Pay Proposal and the Deloitte Ratification Proposal will require approval by the majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting, assuming the presence of a quorum. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will have any effect on these proposals.

Votes will be tabulated by an inspector of election appointed for the Annual Meeting, who will separately tabulate affirmative and negative votes, abstentions and broker non-votes.

Q: What does it mean if I receive more than one notice or proxy card or voting instruction form?

A: It means your shares are registered differently or are held in more than one account at the transfer agent and/or with banks or brokers. Please vote all of your shares.

Q: What do I need to do to attend the Annual Meeting?

A: Valid government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, is required to attend the Annual Meeting. The registration desk will open at 9:45 a.m. and the meeting will begin at 10:00 AM. Please note that seating in the meeting room is limited.

If you own shares in street name, you will need to ask your bank or broker for an admission card in the form of a confirmation of beneficial ownership. You will need to bring a confirmation of beneficial ownership with you to vote at the Annual Meeting. If you do not receive your confirmation of beneficial ownership in time, bring your most recent brokerage statement with you to the Annual Meeting. We can use that to verify your ownership of Common Stock and admit you to the meeting; however, you will not be able to vote your shares at the meeting.

Q: Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

A: We plan to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and to publish final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting.

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be used at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION (the “Corporation”) to be held on May 9, 2019. The first mailing of the proxy material to the shareholders is expected to be made on or about March 29, 2019.

The accompanying proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Corporation. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by use of the mails, proxies may be solicited by directors and employees, in person or by telephone, and brokers and nominees may be requested to send proxy material to and obtain proxies from their principals. The Corporation will pay the costs incurred for solicitations of proxies.

7

 


 

Any shareholder has the power to revoke the proxy at any time prior to the voting thereof. Revocation of the proxy will not be effective until notice thereof has been given to the Secretary of the Corporation, a duly executed proxy bearing a later date is presented or the shareholder subsequently votes the shares subject to the proxy.

VOTING SECURITIES AND RECORD DATE

Only holders of record of Common Stock of the Corporation at the close of business on March 12, 2019, will be entitled to vote at the meeting. On that date, there were 12,494,846 shares of Common Stock outstanding. The holders of those shares are entitled to one vote per share. In the election of directors, the shares may be voted cumulatively. Cumulative voting means that the number of shares owned by each shareholder may be multiplied by the number of directors to be elected and that total voted for the nominees in any proportion. Shares that are not voted cumulatively are voted on a one vote per share basis for each nominee, except for those nominees, if any, for whom the shareholder is withholding authority to vote. If you return your signed proxy but do not indicate how you wish to vote, your shares will be voted non-cumulatively “FOR” the election of each of the director nominees named in this Proxy Statement or voted cumulatively for one or more of the nominees at the discretion of the Proxies; “FOR” the Articles Amendment Proposal; “FOR” approval of the Say-on-Pay Proposal; and “FOR” approval of the Deloitte Ratification Proposal.

REQUIRED VOTE

Under Pennsylvania law and the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, the presence of a quorum is required to transact business at the 2019 Annual Meeting. A quorum is defined as the presence, either in person or by proxy, of a majority of the votes that all shareholders are entitled to cast at the meeting. For these purposes, shares that are present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting will be counted toward a quorum, regardless of whether the holder of the shares or proxy abstains with respect to or withholds authority to vote on a particular matter, whether a broker is present or represented by proxy but lacks discretionary voting authority with respect to any particular matter or whether a broker with discretionary authority fails to exercise such authority with respect to any particular matter.

Proposal 1—Election of Directors. With respect to the election of directors, the nominees who receive the most votes for the available positions will be elected. If you withhold authority to vote for a particular nominee on your proxy card, your vote will not count either “FOR” or “AGAINST” the nominee. Abstentions are not counted in the election of directors, and neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will affect the outcome.

Proposal 2—Articles Amendment Proposal.  The Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation (the “Articles”) require the affirmative vote of the holders of not less than 75% of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote in an annual election of directors, voting together as a single class, to amend the Articles, unless such amendment has been approved by at least a two-third vote of the whole Board of Directors, in which event the affirmative vote of the holders of not less than a majority of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote in an annual election of directors, voting together as a single class, is required. Since all members of the Board of Directors have voted “FOR” the Articles Amendment Proposal, the approval by the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares, voting together as a single class, is required to adopt the Articles Amendment Proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote AGAINST the Articles Amendment Proposal.

Proposal 3 — Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. The approval of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required for advisory (non-binding) approval of our executive compensation program under the Say-on-Pay Proposal. The vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Corporation, the Compensation Committee or our Board. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will count as votes cast and neither will affect the outcome of the Say-on-Pay Proposal.

Proposal 4—Deloitte Ratification Proposal. With respect to the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2019, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required for approval. If the shareholders do not ratify the appointment of Deloitte, the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee, but Deloitte may still be retained. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will count as votes cast and neither will affect the outcome of the Deloitte Ratification Proposal.

8

 


 

If a broker indicates on its proxy that it does not have authority to vote certain shares held in “street name,” the shares not voted are referred to as “broker non-votes.” Broker non-votes occur when brokers do not have discretionary voting authority to vote certain shares held in street name on particular proposals under the rules of the NYSE, and the beneficial owner of those shares has not instructed the broker how to vote on those proposals. If you are a beneficial owner, your broker, bank or other nominee is permitted to exercise discretionary authority to vote your shares on Proposal 3, the Deloitte Ratification Proposal, even if it does not receive voting instructions from you. However, it is not permitted to exercise discretionary authority to vote your shares on Proposals 1 and 2 in the absence of voting instructions from you.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(Proposal 1)

A class of two directors will stand for election for a term of three years to fill the class of directors whose term expires in 2019. One of the two nominees for election to the Board of Directors is currently a director. The nominees were recommended by the Nominating and Governance Committee and nominated by the Board of Directors at its March meeting and have indicated that they are willing to serve as directors if elected. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW. If at the time of the Annual Meeting a nominee should be unable or unwilling to stand for election, the proxies will be voted for the election of such person, if any, as may be selected by the Board of Directors to replace him or her.  

Nominee for Director for a Term of Office Expiring in 2022:

ELIZABETH A. FESSENDEN (age 63, Director since 2017). Ms. Fessenden served in several leadership positions at Alcoa Inc. from 1977 to 2005. Since 2008, she has been the principal of Fessenden Associates, a business consulting company. She has been a member of the board of directors of Quarles Petroleum since January of 2015. She also served as a director of Cardno from 2014 to 2015 and of O’Brien & Gere, from 2008 to 2014. Ms. Fessenden also served on the advisory board of Alloy Polymers and the board of directors of Polymer Group Inc. Ms. Fessenden was appointed to the Board effective as of August 10, 2017, to fill a newly created directorship. Ms. Fessenden’s extensive operations experience in the metals industry, her many years of service as a director of companies, and her broad leadership experience led the Board to conclude that she should serve as a director.

TERRY L. DUNLAP (age 59, Nominated in 2019).  Mr. Dunlap served in several leadership positions at Allegheny Technologies Incorporated, a global manufacturer of technically advanced specialty materials and complex components, from 1983 to 2014, where he last served as Executive Vice President, ATI Flat-Rolled Products, from 2011 to 2014. Mr. Dunlap has been the principal of Sweetwater LLC, a consulting and investment firm with a primary focus on metals and manufacturing, since January 2015. Mr. Dunlap has been a member of the board of directors of Matthews International since February 2015 and the board of directors of TimkenSteel since August 2015. He also served on the board of directors of Elliott Group Holdings from 2015 to 2019. Mr. Dunlap’s extensive operations experience in the metals industry, years of board service and broad leadership experience led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

Continuing Directors Whose Term of Office Expires in 2021:

MICHAEL I. GERMAN (age 68, Director since 2014). Mr. German has been the Chief Executive Officer and President of Corning Natural Gas Holding Corporation (formerly known as Corning Natural Gas Corporation), a holding company for natural gas and electric utilities, for more than five years. Mr. German has been a director of Corning Natural Gas Holding Corporation since 2014 (and a director of Corning Natural Gas Corporation from 2006 until 2014) and is on the Boards of Directors of Three River Development Corporation and Northeast Gas Association, as well as the board of trustees of the Adirondack Park Institute. Mr. German also was a director of Pennichuck Corporation from 2008 until 2011. Mr. German’s experience as the chief executive officer of a public company, his many years of service as a director of companies and his broad leadership experience led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

J. BRETT MCBRAYER (age 53, Director since 2018).  Mr. McBrayer has served as the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer since July of 2018.  He previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer at Airtex Products and ASC Industries, a global manufacturer and distributor of automotive aftermarket and OEM fuel and

9

 


 

water pumps, from 2012 through 2017. Mr. McBrayer had also served as Vice President and General Manager of the Alcan Cable business at Rio Tinto Alcan, as Vice President and General Manager of the Specialty Metals Division at Precision Cast Parts Corporation, and held positions of various responsibility and leadership during his 20 years with Alcoa, Inc.  Mr. McBrayer’s extensive experience in global industrial businesses and his broad executive leadership experience led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

Continuing Directors Whose Term of Office Expires in 2020:

JAMES J. ABEL (age 73, Director since 2014). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Abel served as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of CPI Corporation, an operator of portrait studios, from February 2012 to April 2013 and as a director from 2004 to April 2013. Mr. Abel previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Financial Executives International, a firm representing senior financial executives in dealing with regulatory agencies involved with corporate financial reporting and internal controls, from May 2008 to February 2009. Mr. Abel has served as a director of The LGL Group, Inc., a globally-positioned producer of industrial and commercial electronic components and instruments, from 2011 until 2014. Mr. Abel’s background as a senior executive, his expertise in financial management and his experience with manufacturing operations, as well as his board experience, led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

WILLIAM K. LIEBERMAN (age 71, Director since 2004). Mr. Lieberman has been President of The Lieberman Companies, insurance brokerage and consulting company, for more than five years. In addition to more than forty years of management experience in the insurance, benefit and risk management areas, Mr. Lieberman has served as a director or trustee of many organizations including charitable companies, hospitals and universities. These qualifications led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

STEPHEN E. PAUL (age 51, Director since 2002). Mr. Paul has been a managing principal of Laurel Crown Partners, a private investment company, for more than five years. He became a President of The Louis Berkman Investment Company, a private investment company, in 2013. Mr. Paul’s background in investment banking and private equity investment led the Board to conclude that he should serve as a director.

CARL H. PFORZHEIMER, III (age 82, Director since 1982). Mr. Pforzheimer has been Managing Partner or Manager of Carl H. Pforzheimer & Co. LLC, an investment banking firm, or its predecessors or related entities for more than five years. In addition to the attendant investment advisory analytical skills gained from such a position, his former role as chairman of the Audit and Risk Management Committees of U. S. Trust Co. led the Board to conclude Mr. Pforzheimer should serve as a director.


10

 


 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Summary

Presented below are some highlights of our corporate governance practices and policies. You can find further details about these and other corporate governance practices and policies in the following pages of this Proxy Statement.

 

Our Board is currently comprised of 10 directors, a majority of whom have been determined by the Board to be independent. Because three of our directors are not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting, our Board adopted a resolution on March 6, 2019, to reduce the size of the Board to nine, as permitted by our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation. Thus, immediately following the Annual Meeting, if Ms. Fessenden and Mr. Dunlap are elected to the Board by our shareholders, there will be eight directors on our Board, with one vacancy remaining.  Pursuant to the Shareholder Support Agreement, dated as of March 3, 2016, by and among the Corporation, Altor Fund II GP Limited (“Altor Fund”), and other signatories thereto, Altor Fund is entitled to designate one nominee to serve on our Board, until such time when Altor Fund and certain of its affiliates own, in the aggregate, less than 888,302 shares.  Altor Fund’s prior nominee, Mr. Fredrik Strömholm, resigned from the Board effective May 9, 2018, and Altor Fund has not designated another nominee since his resignation.

 

We currently have separate non-executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles. On March 6, 2019, the Board elected James J. Abel to serve as our non-executive Chairman, effective as of May 9, 2019.

 

All of the Board’s standing committees, other than the Executive Committee, are composed entirely of independent directors, and each such standing committee has a written charter that is reviewed and reassessed annually.

 

We have an annual self-evaluation process for the Board and each standing committee, other than the Executive Committee.

 

The Board evaluates individual directors whose terms are nearing expiration and who may be proposed for re-election. The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders on the same basis as other candidates.

 

The Board has designated Carl H. Pforzheimer, III, Chairman of our Audit Committee, as an “audit committee financial expert.” Our internal audit function reports directly to the Audit Committee. We annually ask our shareholders to ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of the Corporation’s independent auditors.

 

The Corporation has determined that it will hold a Say-on-Pay vote annually until the next shareholder vote on the frequency of such votes.

 

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the Corporation’s website at www.ampcopittsburgh.com.

 

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of the Corporation’s officers, directors and employees, and our additional Code of Ethics, which applies to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, are available on the Corporation’s website at www.ampcopittsburgh.com.

 

The Board has adopted an anti-hedging policy pursuant to which, without prior approval, no director, officer or employee of the Corporation at any time may purchase financial instruments that are designed to or that may reasonably be expected to have the effect of hedging or offsetting a decrease in the market value of any securities of the Corporation.

 

The Board has adopted an anti-pledging policy pursuant to which officers and directors of the Corporation are prohibited from holding any securities of the Corporation in margin accounts or pledging any securities of the Corporation as collateral for any loan, subject to exceptions for de minimis pledging with prior approval.

11

 


 

 

The Board has adopted a clawback policy in connection with short and long-term incentive plans. Pursuant to the policy, if the Corporation is required, because of fraud or negligence, to restate financial results for any restatement period in a manner that would have adversely affected the amount of the payout of any incentive compensation awards, the Compensation Committee has the right, during the three-year period following the restatement period, to review the matter and determine what, if any, repayment participants will be required to make.

 

The Board has adopted a policy prohibiting excise tax gross-ups of perquisites pursuant to which the Corporation is prohibited from making any tax gross-up payments to executive officers, except for gross-ups applicable to management employees generally, such as an expatriate tax equalization payment.

 

The Board has adopted a whistleblower policy to protect any employee who, in good faith, reports incidents of unethical business conduct, violations of laws or accounting standards, internal accounting controls or audit standards or danger to employees or public health and safety.

Board Independence

The Board of Directors has adopted categorical standards to assist it in evaluating the independence of its directors. The standards are attached to the Corporate Governance Guidelines which are available on the Corporation’s website at www.ampcopittsburgh.com. After performing this evaluation in accordance with those guidelines, the Board has determined that James J. Abel, Leonard M. Carroll, Elizabeth A. Fessenden, Michael I. German, William K. Lieberman, Carl H. Pforzheimer, III, and Ernest G. Siddons do not have material relationships with the Corporation (other than as members of the Board of Directors) and are independent within the meaning of the Corporation’s independence standards and those of the NYSE.

Audit Committee members must meet additional independence standards under NYSE listing standards and rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Specifically, Audit Committee members may not receive any compensation from the Corporation other than their directors’ compensation. The Board has also determined that each member of the Audit Committee satisfies the enhanced standards of independence applicable to Audit Committee members under NYSE listing standards and SEC rules.

The Board has determined in its judgment that the Compensation Committee is composed entirely of independent directors within the Corporation’s independence standards and those of the NYSE. In making its determination, the Board considered, among other things, the factors applicable to members of the Compensation Committee pursuant to NYSE listing standards and Rule 10C-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Leadership Structure

Mr. McBrayer is the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer. Leonard M. Carroll currently serves as the non-executive Chairman.  On March 6, 2019, the Board voted to elect Mr. James J. Abel as non-executive Chairman of the Board, effective as of May 9, 2019. The Chairman sets the agendas for and presides over the Board meetings. Mr. McBrayer is a member of the Board and participates in its meetings. The Board believes that this leadership structure is appropriate for the Corporation at this time because it allows for independent oversight of management, increases management accountability and encourages an objective evaluation of management’s performance relative to compensation. The Board will assess periodically whether the roles should be separated or combined based on its evaluation of what is in the best interests of the Corporation and its shareholders.

As Chief Executive Officer, Mr. McBrayer is the full-time executive managing the day-to-day operations of the Corporation.

Director Nominating Procedures

The Corporation’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and its Nominating and Governance Committee Charter charge the Nominating and Governance Committee with selecting nominees for election to the Board of Directors and with reviewing, at least annually, the qualifications of new and existing members of the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee also considers the extent to which such members may be considered

12

 


 

“independent” within the meaning of applicable NYSE rules, as well as other appropriate factors, including overall skills and experience.

From time to time, the Nominating and Governance Committee will seek to identify potential candidates for director nominees and will consider potential candidates proposed by other members of the Board of Directors, by management of the Corporation or by shareholders of the Corporation.

In considering candidates submitted by shareholders of the Corporation, the Nominating and Governance Committee will take into consideration the needs of the Board of Directors and the candidate’s qualifications. To have a candidate considered by the Committee, a shareholder must submit the recommendation in writing and must provide the information set forth in, and otherwise comply with, Section 18 of Article II of the Corporation’s Amended and Restated By-Laws.

The shareholder recommendation and information described above must be sent to Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation “c/o Corporate Secretary” at 726 Bell Avenue, Suite 301, P.O. Box 457, Carnegie, PA 15106 and, in order to allow for timely consideration, must be received not less than 90 days in advance of the anniversary date of the Corporation’s most recent annual meeting of shareholders.

Once a person has been identified by the Nominating and Governance Committee as a potential candidate, the Committee may collect and review publicly available information regarding the person to assess whether the person should be considered further. Generally, if the person expresses a willingness to be considered and to serve on the Board of Directors and the Nominating and Governance Committee believes that the candidate has the potential to be a good candidate, the Nominating and Governance Committee would seek to gather information from or about the candidate. Such information may include information gathered through one or more interviews as appropriate and review of his or her accomplishments and qualifications generally, in light of any other candidates that the Nominating and Governance Committee may be considering. The Nominating and Governance Committee’s evaluation process does not vary based on whether the candidate is recommended by a shareholder. Although the Nominating and Governance Committee does not have a formal written diversity policy, it considers the diversity of our Board as a whole, including the skills, background and experience of our directors.

Non-Management Directors

The non-management directors have regularly scheduled executive sessions. Any shareholder who wants to communicate directly with the presiding director or the non-management directors as a group can do so by following the procedure below under “Shareholder Communications with Directors”.

Shareholder Communications with Directors

The Board of Directors has established a process to receive communications from shareholders and other interested parties. To communicate with the Board of Directors, any individual director or any group or committee of directors, correspondence should be addressed to the Board of Directors or such individual or group or committee and sent to Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation “c/o Corporate Secretary” at 726 Bell Avenue, Suite 301, P.O. Box 457, Carnegie, PA 15106. Communications sent in this manner will be reviewed by the office of the Corporate Secretary for the purpose of determining whether the contents represent a message to one or more of the Corporation’s directors. Depending on the subject matter, the Corporate Secretary may attempt to handle the inquiry directly, such as when it is a request for information about the Corporation or a stock-related matter. The Corporate Secretary also may not forward the communication if it is primarily commercial in nature or it relates to an improper or irrelevant topic.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors as a whole is responsible for risk management oversight of the Corporation and ensuring that management develops sound business strategies. The involvement of the full Board of Directors in setting the Corporation’s business strategy and objectives is integral to the Board’s assessment of our risk profile and also a determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk and how best to manage any such risk. This involves receiving reports and/or presentations from applicable members of management, the Chief Risk Officer, the Enterprise Risk Management Committee of the Corporation, and the committees of the Board. The full Board of Directors

13

 


 

continually evaluates risks such as financial risk, legal/compliance risk, operational/strategic risk, cybersecurity risk and fraud risk and addresses individual risk issues with management throughout the year as necessary.

While the Board of Directors has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, the Board delegates responsibility for certain aspects of risk management to its standing committees. In particular, the Audit Committee focuses on enterprise risks and related controls and procedures, including financial reporting, fraud and regulatory risks. The Compensation Committee strives to create compensation practices that do not encourage excessive levels of risk taking that would be inconsistent with the Corporation’s strategy and objectives. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the Corporation’s corporate governance and corporate governance principles.

Director Terms

The Board is divided into three classes, and the directors in each class serve for three-year terms unless unable to continue to serve due to death, resignation, retirement or disability. The term of one class of directors expires each year at the Corporation’s annual meeting of shareholders. The Board may fill a vacancy by electing a new director to the same class as the director being replaced or by reassigning a director from another class. The Board also may create a new director position in any class and elect a director to hold the newly created position. In accordance with our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, all directors elected to fill vacancies shall hold office for a term expiring at the annual meeting of shareholders at which the term of the class to which they have been elected expires.

Annual Meeting Attendance

The Corporation encourages its directors to attend the Annual Meeting of the Corporation’s shareholders. All of the directors then in office were in attendance at the 2018 Annual Meeting.


14

 


 

BOARD COMMITTEES; DIRECTOR COMPENSATION; STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

Summary

During 2018, the Board had four standing committees: Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Executive Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Board makes committee and committee chair assignments annually at its meeting immediately preceding the annual meeting of shareholders, although further changes to committee assignments may be made from time to time as deemed appropriate by the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee Charter, the Audit Committee Charter and the Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the Corporation’s website at www.ampcopittsburgh.com.

The current composition of the Board and each committee of the Board is set forth below:

 

Director

 

Audit

Committee

 

 

Compensation

Committee

 

 

Executive

Committee

 

 

Nominating and

Corporate

Governance

Committee

 

 

Board of

Directors

 

James J. Abel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

C

 

 

X

 

Leonard M. Carroll (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C

 

 

 

 

 

 

C

 

Elizabeth A. Fessenden

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Michael I. German

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

William K. Lieberman

 

X

 

 

C

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Laurence E. Paul (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Stephen E. Paul

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III

 

C

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

 

X

 

Ernest G. Siddons (1)

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

2018 Meetings

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

7

 

 

X—Member

C—Chair

 

1.  Messrs. Carroll, L. Paul and Siddons have notified the Corporation that they do not intend to stand for re-election and, therefore, their service as directors of the Corporation will end at the Annual Meeting.

All of the directors attended at least 75% of the applicable Board and committee meetings in 2018.

The non-management directors meet separately in regularly scheduled executive sessions without members of management present, except to the extent that the non-management directors request the attendance of one or more members of management. The Chairman presides over meetings of the non-management directors.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee held 5 meetings in 2018 and was comprised of four directors: Carl H. Pforzheimer, III (Chairman), Michael I. German, William K. Lieberman, and Ernest G. Siddons.  Ms. Ann E. Whitty, a former director of the Corporation who resigned in August of 2018, also served on the Audit Committee prior to her resignation. None of the Audit Committee members is now, or has within the past five years been, an employee of the Corporation. The Board has determined that none of the members of the Audit Committee have any financial or personal ties to the Corporation (other than director compensation and equity ownership as described in this Proxy Statement) and that they meet the NYSE and SEC standards for independence applicable to members of the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee reviews the Corporation’s accounting and reporting practices, including internal control procedures, and maintains a direct line of communication with the Directors and the independent accountants. The Audit Committee also is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm, including pre-approval of all audit and non-audit services to be

15

 


 

performed by our independent registered public accounting firm, as well as evaluating the performance of our internal audit function and our financial reporting processes.

The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Pforzheimer meets the SEC criteria to be deemed an “audit committee financial expert” and meets the NYSE standard of having accounting or related financial management expertise. Each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee met five times in 2018 and is comprised of three directors: William K. Lieberman (Chairman), Paul A. Gould (until May 2018), Elizabeth A. Fessenden (effective May 2018) and Carl H. Pforzheimer, III. The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Board of Directors compensation programs and policies and reviewing and recommending to the Board of Directors the participation of executives and other key management employees in the various compensation plans of the Corporation.

The Compensation Committee, under the terms of its charter, has the sole authority to retain, approve fees and other terms for, and terminate any compensation consultant used to assist the Compensation Committee in executive compensation matters. The Compensation Committee also may obtain advice and assistance from internal or external legal, accounting or other advisors. In 2018, the Compensation Committee engaged Pay Governance LLC as its independent provider of compensation consulting services for decisions relating to 2018 compensation. The Committee also utilizes external legal advisors and assesses the independence of its advisors.

Certain executive officers of the Corporation attend meetings of the Compensation Committee from time to time and are given the opportunity to express their views on executive compensation matters.

Each member of the Compensation Committee is a “non-employee director” of the Corporation as defined under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and each member is also an “outside director” for the purposes of the corporate compensation provisions contained in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee did not meet in 2018. It is comprised of the following five directors: Leonard M. Carroll (Chairman), James J. Abel, J. Brett McBrayer (effective July 2018), William K. Lieberman, Carl H. Pforzheimer, III, and John S. Stanik (until July 2018). This Committee is responsible for providing guidance and counsel to the Corporation’s management team on significant matters affecting the Corporation and taking action on behalf of the Board where required in exigent circumstances, such as where it is impracticable or infeasible to convene, or obtain the unanimous written consent of, the full Board.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Governance Committee met three times in 2018 and was comprised of four directors: Paul A. Gould (Chairman) (until May 2018), James J. Abel (Chairman effective May 2018), William K. Lieberman and Carl H. Pforzheimer, III. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for identifying individuals qualified to become directors and recommending candidates for membership on the Board of Directors and its committees, developing and recommending to the Board of Directors the Corporation’s corporate governance policies and reviewing the effectiveness of board governance, including overseeing an annual assessment of the performance of the Board of Directors and each of its committees.

Director Compensation

In 2018, each director who was not employed by the Corporation received an annual retainer of $40,000, payable quarterly in cash in equal installments. The Chairman of the Board received an additional $25,000 fee, the Chairman of the Audit Committee received an additional $15,000 annual fee, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee received an additional $10,000 fee, and the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee received an additional $7,500 fee. Further, members of Board committees received the following additional fees: $7,500 for the Audit committee, $5,000 for the Compensation committee, and $3,750 for the Nominating and Governance Committee. Each non-employee director also received an annual stock award valued at $70,000. Directors do not

16

 


 

receive meeting fees. The Compensation Committee reviews director compensation annually, in consultation with Pay Governance LLC, and considers whether changes are necessary.

The table below summarizes the director compensation earned by non-employee directors of the Corporation in 2018:

 

Name(1)

 

Fees Earned or

Paid in

Cash($)(2)

 

 

Stock Awards

($)(3)

 

 

Other

Compensation

($)

 

 

Total ($)

 

James J. Abel

 

 

45,938

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

115,938

 

Leonard M. Carroll

(5)

 

65,000

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

135,000

 

Elizabeth A. Fessenden

 

 

43,333

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

113,333

 

Michael I. German

 

 

47,500

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

117,500

 

Paul A. Gould

(4)

 

15,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

15,000

 

William K. Lieberman

 

 

61,250

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

131,250

 

Laurence E. Paul

(5)

 

40,000

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

110,000

 

Stephen E. Paul

 

 

40,000

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

110,000

 

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III

 

 

63,750

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

133,750

 

Ernest G. Siddons

(5)

 

47,500

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

117,500

 

Fredrik Strömholm

(4)

 

10,000

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

80,000

 

Ann E. Whitty

(4)

 

26,413

 

 

 

70,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

96,413

 

 

(1)

John S. Stanik has served as the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and as a director from January 1, 2015 until June 30, 2018. Mr. Stanik did not receive any compensation for his service on the Board of Directors in 2018. J. Brett McBrayer joined the Corporation as Chief Executive Officer on July 1, 2018. He has served as a director since that time. Mr. McBrayer did not receive any compensation for his service on the Board of Directors in 2018.

(2)

This column reflects annual cash retainer fees, including committee chair fees, as well as committee membership fees paid to each listed director.

(3)

This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value, determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of the stock awards granted to directors. The assumptions made in calculating the grant date fair values are set forth in Note 15 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

(4)

Paul A. Gould did not run for re-election at the end of his three-year term which expired at the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders. Frederik Strömholm resigned from the Board of Directors effective May 9, 2018, due to personal reasons. Ann E. Whitty resigned from the Board of Directors effective August 7, 2018, due to personal reasons.

(5)

Leonard M. Carroll, Laurence E. Paul and Ernest G. Siddons have each notified the Corporation that they do not intend to stand for re-election and, therefore, their service as directors of the Corporation will end at the annual meeting.

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We have a long-standing approach of compensating directors in part with stock awards and encouraging retention of stock acquired through such awards or by market purchases. We believe retention of stock creates a long-term perspective and aligns the interests of our directors with those of our shareholders. In furtherance of this approach, the Board of Directors has established stock ownership guidelines for our CEO requiring the CEO to hold a minimum of 30,000 shares of the Corporation’s common stock, subject to certain exceptions for reasonable estate and tax planning and diversification purposes. Mr. McBrayer has five years to acquire the shares.

The Board of Directors is covered by a director stock ownership policy which provides that all directors must hold at least 1,000 shares of the Corporation’s common stock. All current directors satisfy this policy as of March 12, 2019. The Board of Directors will review these guidelines at least annually to evaluate whether they remain effective.

17

 


 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Beneficial Ownership of More Than Five Percent

The following table sets forth information, to the extent known by the Corporation, concerning individuals (other than directors or officers of the Corporation) or entities holding more than five percent of the outstanding shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock. The “percent of class” in the table below is calculated based upon 12,494,846 shares outstanding as of March 12, 2019.

 

Name of beneficial owner

 

Amount and nature of

beneficial ownership

 

 

 

Percent

of class

 

Mario J. Gabelli

(and entities which he controls or for which he acts as chief investment officer)

One Corporate Center

Rye, NY 10580

 

 

2,472,824

 

(1)

 

 

19.79

%

Altor Fund II GP Limited

(and affiliates)

11-15 Seaton Place

St Helier

Jersey JE4 OQH

Channel Islands

 

 

1,776,604

 

(2)

 

 

14.22

%

The Louis Berkman Investment Company

600 Grant Street, Suite 3230

Pittsburgh, PA 15219

 

 

1,275,706

 

(3)

 

 

10.21

%

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(4)

Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road

Austin, TX, 78746

 

 

760,578

 

(4)

 

 

6.09

%

 

 

(1)

According to the amended Schedule 13D filed on September 26, 2018, Mario J. Gabelli beneficially owns 2,472,824 shares of our Common Stock and has sole dispositive and voting power with respect to such shares.

(2)

According to Schedule 13D filed on April 1, 2016, Altor Fund beneficially owns 1,776,604 shares of our Common Stock. Altor Fund has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by each of the reporting persons, as set forth in the Schedule.

(3)

According to the amended Schedule 13D filed on April 10, 2018, and Form 4 filed on July 31, 2018, The Louis Berkman Investment Company beneficially owns 1,275,706 shares of our Common Stock and has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to such shares.  Laurence E. Paul and Stephen E. Paul, directors of the Corporation, own 27.62% and 28.24%, respectively, of The Louis Berkman Investment Company’s non-voting stock, held in various trusts.

(4)

According to the amended Schedule 13G filed on February 8, 2019, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (“Dimensional Fund”) has sole dispositive power with respect to 760,578 shares our Common Stock and sole voting power with respect to 714,763 shares of our Common Stock. Dimensional Fund is an investment adviser to four investment companies and furnishes investment advice to certain funds, trusts and separate accounts (the “Funds”). All shares of Common Stock are owned by the Funds and Dimensional Fund disclaims beneficial ownership of these securities.

 

Director and Executive Officer Stock Ownership

 

The following table sets forth as of March 12, 2019, information concerning the beneficial ownership of the Corporation’s Common Stock by the Directors and Named Executive Officers and all Directors and Executive Officers of the Corporation as a group. The “percent of class” in the table below is calculated based upon 12,494,846 shares outstanding as of March 12, 2019.

 

18

 


 

Name of beneficial owner

 

Amount and nature of

beneficial ownership

 

 

 

Percent

of class

 

Laurence E. Paul

 

 

1,298,837

 

(1)

 

 

10.4

%

Stephen E. Paul

 

 

1,298,837

 

(2)

 

 

10.4

%

Rose Hoover

 

 

79,512

 

(3)

 

*

 

Carl H. Pforzheimer, III

 

 

41,733

 

(4)

 

*

 

James J. Abel

 

 

41,266

 

(5)

 

*

 

Ernest G. Siddons

 

 

26,138

 

(6)

 

*

 

Leonard M. Carroll

 

 

25,631

 

(5)

 

*

 

Michael I. German

 

 

25,266

 

(5)

 

*

 

William K. Lieberman

 

 

25,131

 

(7)

 

*

 

John S. Stanik

 

 

21,036

 

(10)

 

*

 

Michael G. McAuley

 

 

8,541

 

(8)

 

*

 

Elizabeth A. Fessenden

 

 

7,217

 

(6)

 

*

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

 

4,000

 

(5)

 

*

 

Directors and Executive Officers as a group (18 persons)

 

 

1,740,695

 

(9)

 

 

13.9

%

 

*

Less than 1%

(1)

Represents 23,131 shares owned directly and 1,275,706 shares owned by The Louis Berkman Investment Company. Mr. Paul is a President of The Louis Berkman Investment Company and is a trustee of various trusts which own 27.62% of its non-voting stock.

(2)

Represents 23,131 shares owned directly and 1,275,706 shares owned by The Louis Berkman Investment Company. Mr. Paul is a President of The Louis Berkman Investment Company and is a trustee of various trusts which own 28.24% of its non-voting stock.

(3)

Represents 6,958 shares owned directly, 66,000 shares that she has the right to acquire within sixty days pursuant to stock options and 6,554 RSUs that will vest within sixty days.

(4)

Includes 40,000 shares owned directly, 800 shares held by a trust of which he is a trustee and principal beneficiary, and the following shares in which he disclaims beneficial ownership: 133 shares held by his daughter and 800 shares held by a trust of which he is a trustee.

(5)

Represents shares held directly.

(6)

Includes 2,000 shares held jointly with his wife and 24,138 shares owned directly.

(7)

Includes 3,000 shares held jointly with his wife and 22,131 shares owned directly.

(8)

Represents 3,612 shares held directly and 4,929 RSUs that will vest within sixty days.

(9)

Excludes double counting of shares deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one director.

(10)  Represents 21,036 shares held directly. Mr. Stanik retired from the Corporation on June 30, 2018.  

Unless otherwise indicated, the individuals named have sole investment and voting power.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Corporation’s directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Corporation’s common stock, to file reports of holdings and transactions in the Corporation’s common stock with the SEC and to furnish the Corporation with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file. Based on those records and other information furnished, during 2018, executive officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Corporation’s common stock complied with all filing requirements.

19

 


 

PROPOSAL TO AMEND OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF THE CORPORATION’S COMMON STOCK FROM 20,000,000 SHARES TO 40,000,000 SHARES

(Proposal 2)

On March 6, 2019, the Board of directors approved a proposal to amend our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Articles of Incorporation”) to increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 20,000,000 to 40,000,000.

The proposed amendment would replace the first sentence of Article FIFTH of the Articles of Incorporation with the following language:

“The authorized capital stock of the Corporation shall be 3,000,000 shares of Preference Stock, without par value, and 40,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the par value of $1 per share.”

A copy of the proposed amendment is attached hereto as Annex A (the “Amendment”).

Effect of Increase in Authorized Shares

Following the effectiveness of the increase in authorized shares, current holders of common stock will own the same number of shares of common stock than prior to the increase. The Amendment will not change the terms of the common stock and the additional shares of common stock to be authorized pursuant to the Amendment would have rights identical to the currently outstanding common stock of the Corporation. The Amendment will not affect the rights of current holders of the company’s common stock, none of whom have preemptive or similar rights to acquire the newly authorized shares.  Each shareholder’s percentage ownership of outstanding common stock will not be altered. The par value of the common stock will not change, and the outstanding common stock will remain fully paid and non-assessable. 

Purposes of the Articles Amendment Proposal

Article FIFTH of the Articles of Incorporation authorizes the Corporation to issue 20,000,000 shares of common stock.  The authorization was established in 1985.  

As of March 12, 2019, the record date for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders:

 

(i)

12,494,846 shares of common stock are issued and outstanding;

 

(ii)

797,354 shares are issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and upon vesting of restricted stock units; and

 

(iii)

760,375 unallocated shares of common stock are available for future awards under the Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

The Board believes it is in the best interest of the Corporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock in order to give the Corporation greater flexibility and responsiveness in considering and planning for future corporate needs, including, but not limited to, stock dividends, grants under equity compensation plans, stock splits, financing activities, potential strategic transactions, including mergers, acquisitions, and business combinations, as well as other general corporate transactions. The Board believes that additional authorized shares of common stock will enable the company to take timely advantage of market conditions and other opportunities that become available to the Corporation without the delay and expense associated with convening a special meeting of the Corporation’s shareholders.

20

 


 

Potential Risks Associated with the Amendment

The Corporation has no current plan, commitment, arrangement, understanding or agreement regarding the issuance of the additional shares of common stock that will result from the Corporation’s adoption of the Amendment.  On September 27, 2018 the Corporation filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the SEC in connection with the possible offering of subscription rights to our existing common shareholders to purchase units consisting of shares of common stock and warrants (the “Potential Offering”).  On November 5, 2018 the Corporation announced a postponement of the Potential Offering.  While the Corporation has no current plan or binding commitments for any transactions at this time, there can be no assurance that the Corporation will not undertake the Potential Offering or any other transaction in the future.  If the Amendment is approved, the Corporation may use some of the shares of common stock that would become available for issuance as a result for the Potential Offering or other potential transactions involving equity securities.

Except as otherwise required by law or by a regulation of the New York Stock Exchange, the newly authorized shares of common stock will be available for issuance at the discretion of the Board (without further action by the shareholders) for various future corporate needs, including those outlined above. While adoption of the Amendment would not have any immediate dilutive effect on the proportionate voting power or other rights of the Corporation’s existing shareholders, any future issuance of additional authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock may, among other things, dilute the earnings per share and book value of the common stock and the voting rights of those holding common stock at the time the additional shares are issued.

In addition to the corporate purposes mentioned above, an increase in the number of authorized shares of the Corporation’s common stock may make it more difficult to, or discourage an attempt to, obtain control of the Corporation by means of a takeover bid that the board of directors determines is not in the best interest of the Corporation and its shareholders, as additional shares of common stock could be issued to dilute the stock ownership and voting power of, or increase the cost to, a party seeking to obtain control of the Corporation. However, the Board of directors is not aware of any attempt or plan to obtain control of the Corporation.

Vote Required

Since all members of the Board of Directors have voted “FOR” the Articles Amendment Proposal, the approval by the holders of at least a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares, voting together as a single class, is required to adopt the Articles Amendment Proposal.

If the Amendment is approved, it will become effective upon its filing with the Secretary of State of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, which will occur as soon as practicable after the approval.

The board recommends that you vote “FOR” the proposal to approve the amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock FROM 20,000,000 SHARES TO 40,000,000 SHARES.

 


21

 


 

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(Proposal 3)

The Say-on-Pay vote is advisory and therefore not binding on the Corporation or the Board. However, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee will carefully review the opinions that our shareholders express and will take the outcome of the vote into account when making decisions regarding executive compensation. Our Board of Directors adopted a policy to hold this advisory vote on executive compensation annually.

We believe that the Say-on-Pay vote represents an additional means by which we may obtain important feedback from our shareholders about executive compensation. As set forth in the Compensation Overview, the overall objectives of our executive compensation program are to provide compensation that is competitive, create a structure that is based on achievement of performance goals and provide incentive for long-term continued employment.

In accordance with the voting results for the proposal considered at the Corporation’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders regarding the frequency of advisory Say-on-Pay votes, the Corporation determined to hold an advisory Say-on-Pay vote annually until the next shareholder vote on the frequency of such advisory Say-on-Pay votes.

Shareholders are encouraged to read the Compensation Overview, starting on page 24, which discusses how the elements of the compensation packages for the named executive officers are determined, and review the Summary Compensation Table and the other related information following the Summary Compensation Table. The Board and the Compensation Committee believe that the Corporation’s policies and procedures on executive compensation are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders and are effective in achieving the strategic goals of the Corporation. The Say-on-Pay vote gives you, as a shareholder, the opportunity to endorse or not endorse our executive compensation program by voting for or against the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the “Corporation”) approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Corporation’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Corporation’s proxy statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Overview, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure.”

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THIS RESOLUTION AND THEREBY ENDORSE THE CORPORATION’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM.


22

 


 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION OVERVIEW

Our Compensation Overview describes the key features of our executive compensation program for 2018 for our “named executive officers”:

2018 Named Executive Officers

 

Name

 

Title (as of last day of 2018)

J. Brett McBrayer

 

Chief Executive Officer (as of 7/1/2018)

John S. Stanik

 

Former Chief Executive Officer (until 6/30/2018)

Michael G. McAuley

 

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Rose Hoover

 

President and Chief Administrative Officer

 

We have divided this discussion into five parts:

 

1.

2018 Highlights

 

2.

Key Features of Our Executive Compensation Program

 

3.

2018 Compensation Objectives and Governance

 

4.

2018 Compensation Decisions

 

5.

Other Compensation Practices and Policies

2018 HIGHLIGHTS

 

 

The 2018 executive compensation program features a balanced mix of salary and performance-driven annual and long-term incentive award opportunities. The chart below illustrates the target compensation opportunities in 2018 for Mr. McBrayer, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO,” and also referred to as our Principal Executive Officer or “PEO”) (note that the chart depicts the full annual opportunity, while Mr. McBrayer would only be eligible for the 50% of the total opportunity since his employment with the Corporation began on July 1, 2018).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23

 


 

 

Despite an 8.9% increase in total revenue from continuing operations, 2018 was a challenging year for the Corporation.  Our Forged and Cast Engineered Products segment generated record sales to the oil and gas industry but that market experienced a significant contraction for the Corporation in the second half of the year due to inventory corrections in the frac block supply chain.  In addition, results from continuing operations in 2018 reflected several negative factors that impacted the segment, including higher costs of raw materials and other critical production materials, key equipment reliability issues which resulted in shipment delays and higher maintenance costs, and idle capacity at one of our cast roll plants. The Air and Liquid Processing segment performed well in 2018, increasing its revenue by approximately 2.3%.

 

Overall, the Forged and Cast Engineered Products segment did not achieve its 2018 goal related to income from operations, a key metric in our compensation program. The Air and Liquid Processing segment exceeded its operating income goal. The Corporation was not able to achieve the adjusted earnings per share (“EPS”) goal.

Based on these business performance results, the named executive officers forfeited a significant amount of compensation in 2018, which exhibits our pay-for-performance philosophy.  Specifically, the award related to the Forged and Cast Engineered Products segment income from operations was forfeited.  Further, because the 2018 EPS threshold goal was not achieved, the portion of the 2018 annual incentive award related to EPS was also forfeited. In addition, since the 2018 EPS threshold goal was not achieved, the portions of the 2016-2018 and the 2017-2019 performance stock unit (“PSU”) awards related to EPS were forfeited. The threshold for the relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) portion of the 2016-2018 PSUs was also not achieved, and as a result, that portion of the 2016-2018 PSUs was also forfeited. The named executive officers did receive annual incentive awards related to the Air and Liquid Systems segment income from operations. Each of the named executive officers also received annual incentive awards based on personal performance.

24

 


 

KEY FEATURES OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

 

 

Our Compensation Committee believes that our executive compensation program includes key features that align the interests of our named executive officers and the Corporation’s long-term strategic direction with the interests of our shareholders and does not include features that could misalign their interests.

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

KEY FEATURES

    

 

 

 

 

•     Align CEO Pay with Corporate Performance:

A significant portion of our CEO’s actual pay is tied to annual performance goals and long-term shareholder returns. A majority of long-term incentive awards were provided as PSUs.

 

 

 

 

•     Use Long-Term Incentives to Link a Significant Portion of Named Executive Officer Pay to Company Performance:

A significant portion of pay for our named executive officers is long-term incentives linked to growing earnings per share and total shareholder return.

 

 

 

 

•     Balance Short-Term and Long-Term Incentives:

Our incentive programs provide an appropriate balance of annual and long-term incentives and include multiple measures of performance.

 

 

 

 

•     Cap Incentive Awards:

Annual incentive awards and PSUs include capped payouts (200% for annual incentives and 150% for PSUs).

 

 

 

 

•     Mitigate Excessive Risk-taking Behaviors by Named Executive Officers:

Our executive compensation program includes features that reduce the possibility of our named executive officers, either individually or as a group, making excessively risky business decisions that could maximize short-term results at the expense of long-term value.

 

 

 

 

•     Authorize the Board to Claw Back Executive Compensation:

We have implemented a clawback policy applicable to executive officers pursuant to which, if the Corporation is required, because of fraud or negligence, to restate financial results for any Restatement Period in a manner that would have adversely affected the amount of the payout of any incentive compensation awards, the Committee has the right during the three-year period following the Restatement Period to review the matter and determine what, if any, repayment executives will be required to make.

 

 

 

 

•     Use of Independent Compensation Consultant:

In 2018, the Committee engaged Pay Governance LLC, a compensation consulting firm, to assist it in fulfilling its responsibilities and duties. Pay Governance LLC does not provide any other services to the Corporation.

 

 

 

 

•     Use of Peer Group:

The Compensation Committee periodically checks its compensation decisions against executive compensation at a peer group of companies comparable in terms of the primary scope metric of revenue and secondary scope metrics of market cap, assets and number of employees to ensure that our executive compensation program provides competitive compensation opportunities. The same peer group is used to determine our relative performance for vesting of a portion of PSU awards.

 

 

 

 

•     Multi-Year Vesting Periods:

The equity awards granted to our executive officers are earned over multi-year periods, consistent with current practice and our retention objectives.

 

 

 

 

•     Use of Performance Metrics:

A significant portion of each executive’s annual pay is based on objective performance metrics. Our executive compensation program is designed so that a significant portion of compensation is “at-risk” based on corporate performance, as well as equity-based to align the interests of our executive officers and shareholders.

 

 

 

 

•     No Section 280G Tax Gross-Up Rights:

We do not provide any Code Section 280G excise tax gross-up rights or any other significant tax gross-up rights to our executive officers.

 

 

 

 

•     No Option Repricing or Replacement without Shareholder Approval:

The Corporation’s 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan prohibits “underwater” options from being repriced or replaced (either with new options or other equity awards), unless approved by our shareholders.

 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

 

25

 


 

2018 COMPENSATION OBJECTIVES

 

 

The compensation paid or awarded to our named executive officers for 2018 was designed to meet the following objectives:

 

Provide compensation that is competitive with compensation for executive officers providing comparable services, taking into account the size of the Corporation, the nature of its business, and the location of its headquarters. We refer to this objective as “competitive compensation.”

 

Create a compensation structure under which a meaningful portion of total compensation is based on achievement of performance goals relating to the Corporation’s and the individuals’ performance and to enhancement of shareholder value. We refer to this objective as the “performance incentive.”

 

Provide an incentive for long-term continued employment with us. We refer to this objective as the “retention incentive.”

We believe various components of our 2018 compensation payments and awards meet the following objectives:

 

Type of Compensation

 

Objectives Addressed

Salary

 

Competitive Compensation

Performance Incentives

Incentive Bonus Plan Awards

 

Competitive Compensation

Performance Incentives

Restricted Stock Units

 

Competitive Compensation

Retention Incentives

Performance Stock Units

 

Competitive Compensation

Performance Incentives

Retention Incentives

Change in Control Severance Protection

 

Competitive Compensation

Retention Incentives

SERP Benefits

 

Competitive Compensation

Retention Incentives

 

In 2018, compensation decisions for our CEO were made by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee, in consultation with the CEO, made a recommendation to the Board of Directors with respect to director compensation and compensation of executive officers who report directly to the CEO, including each of the named executive officers. In assessing competitive compensation, the Committee relied primarily on recommendations provided by Pay Governance LLC as the Committee’s independent compensation consultants.

2018 COMPENSATION DECISIONS

 

 

Salaries

New salary levels for our named executive officers were established in April of 2018, except that Mr. Stanik’s salary was not changed due to his planned departure from the Corporation upon his retirement. Determinations regarding salary adjustments are made based on a number of objective and subjective factors, including cost of living increases, the Corporation’s financial performance, and a qualitative analysis of each individual officer’s performance during the preceding year, taking into account such factors as leadership, commitment and execution of corporate initiatives and special projects assigned by the Board, the Chairman or the CEO. We also consider whether there has been any material change in the officer’s title, duties and responsibilities in the preceding year. Where an officer has assumed material additional duties, or has been promoted, an above-normal salary adjustment would typically be justified. Finally, in rare circumstances, we may decide to make a market adjustment in salaries if we determine that salary levels for one or more of our named executive officers have fallen materially below levels that we consider appropriate in order to maintain a competitive compensation package and to discourage valued executives from leaving to pursue other opportunities. Salary adjustments for our CEO and other named executive officers are reviewed

26

 


 

and must be approved by the independent members of the Board of Directors, after a recommendation by the Compensation Committee.

Generally, the differences in the level of pay between the named executive officers is the result of the determination by the Committee or by the CEO over time that the level of responsibility, function, experience, and length of service that each of the officers possess.

The base salary determinations for each named executive officer in 2018 were as follows:

 

Name

 

2018 Base

Pre-Adjustment

Salary($)

 

 

2018 Base

Adjusted

Salary($)

 

 

Percentage

Increase

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

n/a

 

 

 

550,000

 

 

n/a

 

John S. Stanik

 

 

630,000

 

 

 

630,000

 

 

0%

 

Michael G. McAuley

 

 

348,000

 

 

 

358,400

 

 

3%

 

Rose Hoover

 

 

375,000

 

 

 

384,400

 

 

3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Key Incentive Plan Changes in 2018

In 2017, our Compensation Committee conducted a comprehensive review of the design of both the annual incentive and the long-term incentive plans and made certain changes which became effective in 2018. The Committee believes that the new design will continue to provide performance-based compensation opportunities tied to measurable performance goals that will drive long-term shareholder value.

The 2018 changes to the Annual Incentive Plan include:

 

The annual incentive is based 70% on the business performance and 30% on individual performance. With respect to the 70% business performance portion, 50% of it will be based on operating income and 50% - on the Corporation’s EPS.

 

For the executives at the corporate level, the operating income portion of the annual incentive is based on the performance of both business segments of the Corporation. For business segment leaders, 100% of the operating income portion of the annual incentive will be based on the performance of the relevant segment.

The 2018 changes to the Long-Term Incentive Plan include:

 

The long-term incentive awards continue to be based on a mix of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and PSUs. However, the RSUs will be weighted 33% of the total long-term incentive opportunity and PSUs will be weighted 67% of the total long-term incentive opportunity. With respect to the PSUs, 50% of the PSUs will be based on Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”) and 50% will be based on relative TSR, each of which will be measured over a three-year performance period.

The Compensation Committee believes that moving the EPS metric from the long-term incentive into the annual incentive ensures that all participants are focused on improving the Corporation’s EPS. In addition, replacing the EPS portion of the long-term incentive with ROIC puts emphasis on the improvement of long-term returns on capital, rather than short-term EPS.


27

 


 

 

Annual Incentive Plan  

The annual incentive bonus plan award for 2018 for each named executive officer was determined using the following formula:

Target Annual Performance

      X

35% Weighting

    X

Business Segment Performance Achievement

     =

Business Performance Portion of Annual Incentive

 

 

 

 

 

     +

 

Target Annual Performance

      X

35% Weighting

    X

Corporate EPS

     =

Corporate EPS Portion of Annual Incentive

 

 

 

 

 

     +

 

Target Annual Performance

      X

30% Weighting

    X

Personal Goal Achievement to Improve Their Area of Responsibility

     =

Personal Performance Portion of Annual Incentive

 

 

 

 

 

 

_______________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Award

Threshold, target and maximum levels were set for the performance goals, such that no amount would be paid for performance below threshold, 50% of target would be paid for performance at threshold, and no more than 200% of target would be paid for performance at or above maximum.  In addition, if the threshold level of Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) is not achieved, payouts for the achievement of personal goals are capped at the target level.

Target Annual Incentive Awards. Target annual incentive awards were established by the Compensation Committee as a percentage of base salary for each named executive officer, intending to provide a competitive bonus opportunity aligned to the named executive officer’s role, responsibilities and historic pay, as follows:

 

Name

 

Target Annual

Incentive

As % of Base Salary

 

 

Target

Annual

Incentive

Amount

 

J. Brett McBrayer (1)

 

75%

 

 

$

412,500

 

John S. Stanik

 

85%

 

 

$

535,500

 

Michael G. McAuley

 

50%

 

 

$

174,000

 

Rose Hoover

 

50%

 

 

$

187,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Mr. McBrayer’s annual incentive is to be pro-rated for 6 months only (to $206,225) since his employment began on July 1, 2018.

 

Business Performance Goals (Weighted 35%). The business performance portion of the annual incentive was based on goals related to the income from operations achieved by the two business segments of the Corporation, the Forged and Cast Engineered Products Segment (weighted at 25%) and the Air and Liquid Processing Segment (weighted at 10%), as compared to the segments’ business plans for 2018. Income from operations was chosen by the Compensation Committee in the belief that it is the most accurate objective measure of business performance. The Compensation Committee eliminates most charges or windfalls which are generally beyond the control of the executives and adjusts actual and planned income to allow for the exclusion, for example, of cost changes related to asbestos litigation, adjustments for acquisitions or divestitures, changes in accounting standards, and other similar changes.

28

 


 

 

Business Segment

Operating Income Goals for 2018 (in $000’s)

 

Forged and Cast

Engineered Products

Segment (25% weight)

 

 

Air and Liquid

Processing

Segment (10% weight)

 

 

Performance

Achievement Level

 

Payout

Percentage

(of Target

Award)

 

Less than 7,000

 

 

Less than 8,000

 

 

Below Threshold

 

0%

 

7,000

 

 

 

8,000

 

 

Threshold

 

50%

 

13,921

 

 

 

10,112

 

 

Target

 

100%

 

 

20,000

 

 

 

12,000

 

 

Maximum

 

200%

 

 

 

Corporate EPS (Weighted 35%).  The Corporate EPS portion of the annual incentive was based on the 2018 earnings per share of the Corporation.  For this purpose, “EPS” means the Corporation’s net income per common share (basic) for each year during the performance period, adjusted as determined by the Committee to exclude the effect of certain items, such as asset write-downs or impairment charges, litigation or claim costs, judgments or settlements, including asbestos claims and defense costs; and the effect of changes in tax laws, accounting principles or other laws or provisions affecting reported results.  

The following table shows the EPS portion of the design.

Corporate EPS Performance Goals

 

Achievement

 

% of EPS Portion

Target Earned

 

 

2018 EPS

Goals

 

 

Below Threshold

 

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Threshold

 

75%

 

 

$

-0.26

 

 

Target

 

100%

 

 

$

0.26

 

 

Maximum

 

150%

 

 

$

0.52

 

 

 

 

Personal Performance Goals (Weighted 30%). The Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board approved, personal performance goals for each of the named executive officers. The Compensation Committee ultimately exercises informed judgment in determining the degree to which individual performance goals are achieved.

 

2018 Annual Incentive Award Decisions Based on Performance. The Forged and Cast Engineered Products segment had an operating loss for 2018, which was below the threshold level of performance for that business segment, resulting in no payout for that portion of the 2018 annual incentive award for the named executive officers. The Air and Liquid Processing segment’s operating income, as adjusted, exceeded the target level of performance, resulting in the payment above target for that portion of the 2018 annual incentive award for the named executive officers. The Corporation did not meet its 2018 EPS goal, resulting in no payout for that portion of the annual incentive award for the named executive officers.  Lastly, the named executive officers earned varying levels of payouts based on their personal performance in 2018 against previously determined goals (with no payout exceeding a target level, since the 2018 EPS goal was not met, as required by the terms of the annual incentive program).  The Compensation Committee approved the following annual incentive awards for the named executive officers for 2018, which are included in the Summary Compensation Table for 2018 under “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation”:  

 

Name

 

Target Annual

Incentive Award

 

 

Business

Performance

Portion

(70% weighting)

 

 

+

 

Personal

Performance

Portion

(30% weighting)

 

 

=

 

Actual

Annual Incentive

Award

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

$

412,500

 

 

$

28,380

 

 

 

 

$

61,875

 

 

 

 

$

90,255

 

John S. Stanik (1)

 

$

535,500

 

 

$

36,842

 

 

+

 

$

35,745

 

 

 

 

$

72,587

 

Michael G. McAuley

 

$

174,000

 

 

$

24,658

 

 

+

 

$

53,760

 

 

 

 

$

78,418

 

Rose Hoover

 

$

187,500

 

 

$

26,447

 

 

+

 

$

57,660

 

 

 

 

$

84,107

 

29

 


 

 

(1) Pursuant to the Retirement and Consulting Agreement between Mr. Stanik and the Corporation Mr. Stanik is entitled to a payment of a pro rata portion of his short-term incentive award for the 2018 fiscal year, in the amount of $72,587, which is to be paid to him in 2019 in shares of common stock of the Corporation, rather than cash.    

 

 

Long-Term Incentive Plan

The Corporation has adopted the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan under which the Compensation Committee may grant the named executive officers and other key employees a variety of types of equity-based awards. The Compensation Committee believes that annual grants of equity-based awards serve the purpose of aligning the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our shareholders. Vesting conditions for equity-based awards also encourage executive retention. Before 2015, the Corporation had the practice of making annual grants of stock options. Since 2015, the Compensation Committee has not granted stock options and instead follows a practice of granting long-term incentive awards in the form of annual grants of PSUs (vesting based on performance over a three-year performance period) and RSUs (vesting based on continued employment over three years). The Compensation Committee believes the current mix of equity incentive awards further ties pay to our Corporation’s performance while also aligning interests with our long-term shareholders and encouraging retention.

Target Award Amounts. The Compensation Committee sets a target dollar amount for the value of long-term incentive awards granted each year, intending to provide a competitive long-term incentive award opportunity aligned to the named executive officer’s role, responsibilities and historic pay, as follows:

 

Name

 

Target Long-Term

Incentive

As % of Base Salary

 

 

Target

Long-Term

Incentive

Amount

 

J. Brett McBrayer

 

110.0%

 

 

$

605,000

 

John S. Stanik

 

105.1%

 

 

$

662,000

 

Michael G. McAuley

 

56.92%

 

 

$

204,000

 

Rose Hoover

 

71.54%

 

 

$

275,000

 

 

Whether the named executive officers realize these target amounts depends on our Corporation’s financial results and stock price performance and the executive’s continued employment with us.

Mix of Awards: PSUs and RSUs. Beginning in 2015, the Compensation Committee determined that the long-term incentive awards for the named executive officers should be provided in a balanced mix of RSUs, weighted 30%, and PSUs, weighted 70%. For 2018, the Compensation Committee adjusted the weighting to be 33% in RSUs and 67% in PSUs.  This weighting, and the performance requirements for PSUs discussed below, is intended to further align the compensation realized by our named executive officers over time with the Corporation’s performance. The PSUs, to the extent earned based on performance, do not vest until the end of the performance period, and the RSUs vest in three equal annual installments starting on the first anniversary of the grant date, to further encourage executive retention. Consistent with past practice, the grants are made on or about the same date as our annual meeting of shareholders for each year.

Performance Design for PSUs. PSUs become earned based on the Corporation’s performance over a three-year performance period, 2018-2020. The Compensation Committee determined that the performance vesting conditions should be based on a mix of our performance against annually determined goals regarding ROIC, weighted 34% of the total long-term incentive award opportunity (including the RSUs), and our TSR as compared against a peer group over the performance period, weighted 33% of the total long-term incentive award opportunity (including the RSUs). The ROIC (calculated as net income divided by the sum of average total debt and shareholders’ equity) performance is measured as percentage point improvement in the Corporation’s ROIC in 2020 versus ROIC in 2017, subject to certain adjustments for mergers and acquisitions, restructurings, foreign exchange fluctuations and accounting changes, among other, which the Committee deems appropriate.  TSR performance ensures that compensation results are tied to our relative performance against our peers.

 

The following table shows the ROIC design.

30

 


 

ROIC Performance Goals

(34% of Total Long-Term Incentive Award Opportunity)

Achievement

 

ROIC Target Improvement

 

% of ROIC Portion

Target Earned

 

Below Threshold

 

less than 5%

 

0%

 

Threshold

 

5%

 

50%

 

Target

 

10%

 

100%

 

Maximum

 

15%

 

200%

 

 

The following table shows the relative TSR design. TSR includes cumulative cash dividends (without interest) declared during the performance period. To guard against stock price volatility, the beginning and ending stock prices for determining relative TSR are based on an 11-day average using the closing price on the applicable date +/-5 trading days.

Relative TSR Performance Goals

(33% of Total Long-Term Incentive Award Opportunity)

 

Achievement

 

TSR Percentile Rank

 

% of TSR Portion

Target Earned

 

Below Threshold

 

Below 25th percentile

 

0%

 

Threshold

 

25th percentile

 

50%

 

Target

 

50th percentile

 

100%

 

Maximum

 

75th percentile and above

 

200%

 

 

The peer companies for this purpose selected by the Compensation Committee are the same as used by the Compensation Committee to view the competitiveness of our executive compensation program, as discussed further below.

For each of the ROIC and relative TSR performance goals, results between threshold and target or between target and maximum are interpolated on a straight-line basis.

2018 Results for PSUs.  The relative TSR for the 2016-2018 PSUs performed below the 25th percentile, and as a result that portion of the 2016-2018 PSUs was forfeited.  ROIC improvement is measured over a three-year period, therefore, no PSUs will be awarded for 2018 for the ROIC portion of the award.  As described above, prior to 2018, a portion of long-term incentive awards was tied to the Corporation’s EPS.  For 2018, our EPS for purposes of the outstanding PSU awards was below the threshold goal set for year 2018 ($(.26)), therefore, the portion of the 2016-2018 PSUs and 2017-2019 PSUs related to the 2018 EPS was forfeited.  

OTHER COMPENSATION PRACTICES AND POLICIES

 

 

See “Key Features of Our Executive Compensation Program” above for a summary of a number of key policies and practices designed to result in a balanced executive compensation program that encourages appropriate, and not excessive, levels of risk taking by our named executive officers. Below are certain additional policies and practices regarding our program:

Use of Peer Companies

The Compensation Committee periodically checks its compensation decisions against executive compensation at a peer group of companies comparable in terms of the primary scope metric of revenue and secondary scope metrics of market cap, assets and number of employees to ensure that our executive compensation program provides competitive compensation opportunities for our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee uses this information for general context on executive compensation practices and levels in the market and does not have a formal policy to benchmark compensation mix or levels for the named executive officers to a specified competitive level against these peers.

The Compensation Committee most recently considered the appropriate peer companies in 2018. At that time,

31

 


 

the Compensation Committee approved a list of 17 peer manufacturing companies, taking into account size and complexity of the business based on revenue, total assets and market cap. At the time established, the Corporation approximated the median size of the peer companies in revenues, was above the median in assets and below median in market cap. The peer company list approved in 2018 is as follows:

 

Badger Meter Inc.

Chase Corporation

DMC Global Inc.

Douglas Dynamics, Inc.

FreightCar America Inc.

Gorman-Rupp Co.

 

Hardinge Inc.

Haynes International, Inc.

Hurco Companies Inc.

Insteel Industries, Inc.

Kadant Inc.

LB Foster Co.

Lydall Inc.

 

Manitex International, Inc.

NN Inc.

Twin Disc, Incorporated

Universal Stainless &

Alloy Products Inc.

 

Ongoing and Post-Employment Agreements

In 2018, the Board of Directors adopted the Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation Executive Severance Plan (the “Executive Severance Plan”) for key executive officers of the Corporation other than the CEO (whose severance benefits are addressed in his offer letter).  We also have a legacy supplemental executive retirement plan that enables certain of our named executive officers to accrue retirement benefits as the executive continues to work for us, as well as change in control agreements that could provide severance benefits upon a change in control. These plans and agreements are designed to be a part of a competitive compensation package. The plans and agreements described below do not include plans that are generally available to all of our salaried employees:

 

Executive Severance Plan — The Board has adopted the Executive Severance Plan which provides severance benefits to key executive officers of the Corporation, other than the CEO, in the event of a termination by the Corporation without “cause” or by a participant for “good reason”.  The named executive officers who participate in the Executive Severance Plan are Mr. Michael G. McAuley and Ms. Rose Hoover.  The Executive Severance Plan is described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.

 

 

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) — We maintain a SERP, which is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that provides benefits for executives in excess of the benefits that may be provided under our tax qualified defined benefit retirement plan (“Plan”) as a result of limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. The SERP also provides additional payment rights and benefits in the event of a change in control. The only named executive officer who participates in the SERP is Ms. Rose Hoover.  The SERP is described under “Retirement Benefits” below.

 

 

Change in Control Agreements — We have change in control agreements with respect to each of our executive officers so that our officers remain focused on the interests of the Corporation and the shareholders, rather than their personal circumstances, in the context of a potential change in control. Our agreements with executives provide for payments and other benefits only if we terminate an executive’s employment without cause or if the executive terminates employment for “good reason” within 24 months following a change in control. The Change in Control agreements are described under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” below.

Tax Considerations

Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) limits the deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to any one named executive officer in any calendar year. Under the tax rules in effect before 2018, compensation that qualified as “performance-based” under Section 162(m) was deductible without regard to this $1 million limit. However, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law December 22, 2017, eliminated this performance-based compensation exception effective January 1, 2018, subject to a special rule that “grandfathers” certain awards and arrangements that were in effect on or before November 2, 2017. As a result, compensation that the Compensation Committee structured in 2017 and prior years with the intent of qualifying as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) that is paid on or after January 1, 2018 may not be fully deductible, depending on the application of the special grandfather rules. Moreover, from and after January 1, 2018, compensation awarded in excess of $1 million to our named executive officers generally will not be deductible. Given our current compensation levels, the potential impact of Section 162(m) has not been a material consideration for the Committee. While the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

32

 


 

may limit the deductibility of compensation paid to the named executive officers in the future, the Committee will—consistent with its past practice—design compensation programs that are in the best long-term interests of the Corporation and our shareholders, with deductibility of compensation being one of a variety of considerations taken into account.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Summary compensation information for our named executive officers for 2018 is set forth in the following table:

 

(a)

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

 

(d)

 

 

(e)

 

 

(f)

 

 

(g)

 

 

(h)

 

 

(i)

 

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

($)

 

Salary

($)

 

 

Bonus

($)

 

 

Stock

Awards

($)(1)

 

 

Non-Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compensation

($)

 

 

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

 

 

All Other

Compensation

($)(2)

 

 

Total ($)

 

PEO—J. Brett McBrayer

 

2018

 

 

275,004

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

429,772

 

 

 

90,255

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

258,555

 

 

 

1,153,586

 

     Chief Executive Officer (as of July 1, 2018)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PEO—John S. Stanik

 

2018

 

 

315,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

167,150

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

31,715

 

 

 

513,865

 

Chief Executive Officer (through June 30, 2018)

 

2017

 

 

627,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

595,168

 

 

 

476,803

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

30,242

 

 

 

1,729,213

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PFO—Michael G. McAuley,

 

2018

 

 

355,800

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

242,882

 

 

 

78,418

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

31,429

 

 

 

708,529

 

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial

 

2017

 

 

346,000

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

166,740

 

 

 

173,720

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

26,013

 

 

 

712,473

 

Officer and Treasurer