e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For transition period from to |
Commission File Number 1-33732
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
United States of America
|
|
42-1572539 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1410 St. Georges Avenue, Avenel, New Jersey
|
|
07001 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (732) 499-7200
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on it
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that
the registrant was required and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock as of the
latest practicable date.
42,306,478 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, were issued and outstanding as of
July 29, 2011.
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report
Table of Contents
1
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
10,731 |
|
|
|
9,862 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions |
|
|
52,176 |
|
|
|
33,990 |
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
62,907 |
|
|
|
43,852 |
|
|
Trading securities |
|
|
4,439 |
|
|
|
4,095 |
|
Securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value
(encumbered $370,796 in 2011 and $275,694 in 2010) |
|
|
1,212,319 |
|
|
|
1,244,313 |
|
Securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (estimated fair value of $4,629
in 2011 and $5,273 in 2010) (encumbered $0 in 2011 and 2010) |
|
|
4,421 |
|
|
|
5,060 |
|
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
Loans held-for-investment, net |
|
|
902,564 |
|
|
|
827,591 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(23,520 |
) |
|
|
(21,819 |
) |
|
Net loans held-for-investment |
|
|
879,044 |
|
|
|
805,772 |
|
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
7,568 |
|
|
|
7,873 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
76,292 |
|
|
|
74,805 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost |
|
|
8,631 |
|
|
|
9,784 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
17,509 |
|
|
|
16,057 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
16,159 |
|
|
|
16,159 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
18,039 |
|
|
|
18,056 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,307,571 |
|
|
|
2,247,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
1,448,569 |
|
|
|
1,372,842 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
444,522 |
|
|
|
391,237 |
|
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
14,440 |
|
|
|
85,678 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,909,400 |
|
|
|
1,850,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 90,000,000 shares authorized, 45,632,611 shares issued
at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively,
42,370,928 and 43,316,021
outstanding at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
207,686 |
|
|
|
205,863 |
|
Unallocated common stock held by employee stock ownership plan |
|
|
(14,896 |
) |
|
|
(15,188 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
230,125 |
|
|
|
222,655 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
15,611 |
|
|
|
10,910 |
|
Treasury stock at cost; 3,261,683 and 2,316,590 shares at June 30, 2011, and
December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
(40,811 |
) |
|
|
(27,979 |
) |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
398,171 |
|
|
|
396,717 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,307,571 |
|
|
|
2,247,167 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Three and six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
12,778 |
|
|
|
12,098 |
|
|
$ |
25,252 |
|
|
|
22,391 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
8,675 |
|
|
|
8,244 |
|
|
|
17,092 |
|
|
|
17,308 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
3,068 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York dividends |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Deposits in other financial institutions |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
22,438 |
|
|
|
22,032 |
|
|
|
44,436 |
|
|
|
43,039 |
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
3,270 |
|
|
|
3,382 |
|
|
|
6,287 |
|
|
|
7,334 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
3,339 |
|
|
|
2,733 |
|
|
|
6,549 |
|
|
|
5,239 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
6,609 |
|
|
|
6,115 |
|
|
|
12,836 |
|
|
|
12,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
15,829 |
|
|
|
15,917 |
|
|
|
31,600 |
|
|
|
30,466 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
2,798 |
|
|
|
3,117 |
|
|
|
4,728 |
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
14,079 |
|
|
|
13,119 |
|
|
|
28,483 |
|
|
|
25,738 |
|
|
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees and service charges for customer services |
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
Income on bank owned life insurance |
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
Gain on securities transactions, net |
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
2,644 |
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities |
|
|
(991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Portion recognized in other comprehensive income (before
taxes) |
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses on securities recognized in earnings |
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
5,299 |
|
|
|
3,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee benefits |
|
|
5,048 |
|
|
|
4,208 |
|
|
|
10,210 |
|
|
|
8,999 |
|
Director compensation |
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
769 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
2,819 |
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
Other |
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
1,896 |
|
|
|
1,893 |
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
9,584 |
|
|
|
8,457 |
|
|
|
19,537 |
|
|
|
17,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
6,685 |
|
|
|
6,528 |
|
|
|
14,245 |
|
|
|
11,749 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,338 |
|
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
4,928 |
|
|
|
4,182 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,347 |
|
|
|
4,186 |
|
|
$ |
9,317 |
|
|
|
7,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
held by the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
employee stock |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
value |
|
|
capital |
|
|
ownership plan |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
income |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
equity |
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
45,628,211 |
|
|
$ |
456 |
|
|
|
202,479 |
|
|
|
(15,807 |
) |
|
|
212,196 |
|
|
|
12,145 |
|
|
|
(19,929 |
) |
|
|
391,540 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,567 |
|
Change in accumulated comprehensive
income, net of tax of $3,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESOP shares allocated
or committed to be released |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
Additional stock benefit on stock
awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
Dividends declared ($0.09 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,581 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,581 |
) |
Issuance of restricted stock |
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock (average cost of $12.00
per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,347 |
) |
|
|
(5,347 |
) |
|
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
45,632,611 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
204,326 |
|
|
|
(15,514 |
) |
|
|
218,156 |
|
|
|
17,428 |
|
|
|
(25,113 |
) |
|
|
399,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
45,632,611 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
205,863 |
|
|
|
(15,188 |
) |
|
|
222,655 |
|
|
|
10,910 |
|
|
|
(27,979 |
) |
|
|
396,717 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,317 |
|
Change in accumulated comprehensive
income, net of tax of $3,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESOP shares allocated
or committed to be released |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
394 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,535 |
|
Additional tax benefit on equity
awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Dividends declared ($0.11 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,846 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,846 |
) |
Treasury stock (average cost of
$13.58 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,838 |
) |
|
|
(12,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
45,632,611 |
|
|
$ |
456 |
|
|
|
207,686 |
|
|
|
(14,896 |
) |
|
|
230,125 |
|
|
|
15,611 |
|
|
|
(40,811 |
) |
|
|
398,171 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010
(Unaudited) (In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,317 |
|
|
|
7,567 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,117 |
|
|
|
4,728 |
|
ESOP and stock compensation expense |
|
|
1,929 |
|
|
|
1,909 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
Amortization of premiums, and deferred loan costs, net of (accretion) of discounts,
and deferred loan fees |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
Income on bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(1,487 |
) |
|
|
(937 |
) |
Gain on sale of premises and equipment and other real estate owned |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
Net gain on sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
5,484 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
Origination of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(4,424 |
) |
|
|
(580 |
) |
Gain on securities transactions, net |
|
|
(2,644 |
) |
|
|
(1,145 |
) |
Net impairment losses on securities recognized in earnings |
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net purchases of trading securities |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Decrease in accrued interest receivable |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(2,084 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(491 |
) |
|
|
296 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
10,489 |
|
|
|
13,085 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in loans receivable |
|
|
(76,940 |
) |
|
|
(45,166 |
) |
Redemptions (purchase) of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, net |
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
(1,698 |
) |
Purchases of securities available-for-sale |
|
|
(342,901 |
) |
|
|
(435,937 |
) |
Principal payments and maturities on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
198,444 |
|
|
|
235,647 |
|
Principal payments and maturities on securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
913 |
|
Proceeds from sale of securities available-for-sale |
|
|
114,446 |
|
|
|
96,082 |
|
Purchase of bank owned life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned |
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
394 |
|
Purchases and improvements of premises and equipment |
|
|
(2,460 |
) |
|
|
(1,960 |
) |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(107,130 |
) |
|
|
(161,725 |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits |
|
|
75,728 |
|
|
|
63,810 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(1,846 |
) |
|
|
(1,581 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(12,838 |
) |
|
|
(5,347 |
) |
Additional tax benefit on equity awards |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Increase in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
Repayments under capital lease obligations |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
Proceeds from borrowings |
|
|
412,981 |
|
|
|
176,680 |
|
Repayments related to borrowings |
|
|
(359,594 |
) |
|
|
(99,680 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
115,696 |
|
|
|
134,958 |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
19,055 |
|
|
|
(13,682 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
43,852 |
|
|
|
42,544 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
62,907 |
|
|
|
28,862 |
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
12,586 |
|
|
|
12,543 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
6,129 |
|
|
|
5,528 |
|
Other transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged-off, net |
|
|
1,416 |
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
Other real estate owned charged-off |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Transfers to other real estate owned |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in due to broker for purchases of securities available-for-sale |
|
|
(70,747 |
) |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements are comprised of the accounts of Northfield Bancorp,
Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Northfield Bank (the Bank), and the Banks wholly-owned
significant subsidiaries, NSB Services Corp. and NSB Realty Trust (collectively, the Company).
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting solely of normal and recurring
adjustments) necessary for the fair presentation of the consolidated financial condition and the
consolidated results of operations for the unaudited periods presented have been included. The
results of operations and other data presented for the three and six month period ended June 30,
2011, are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the year
ending December 31, 2011. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
current year presentation.
Certain information and note disclosures usually included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the
preparation of interim financial statements. The consolidated financial statements presented
should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes to
consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010, of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. as filed with the SEC.
Note 2 Securities Available-for-Sale
The following is a comparative summary of mortgage-backed securities and other securities
available-for-sale at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government sponsored
enterprises (GSE) |
|
$ |
549,817 |
|
|
|
19,543 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
569,359 |
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
9,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
9,044 |
|
Real estate mortgage
investment conduits (REMICs): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
|
475,168 |
|
|
|
4,763 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
479,404 |
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
38,491 |
|
|
|
2,311 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
40,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,073,263 |
|
|
|
26,617 |
|
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
1,098,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments-mutual funds |
|
|
9,140 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,190 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
103,422 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
104,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,562 |
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
113,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
1,185,825 |
|
|
|
27,845 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
1,212,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government sponsored
enterprises (GSE) |
|
$ |
342,316 |
|
|
|
13,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355,795 |
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
27,801 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
27,878 |
|
Real estate mortgage
investment conduits (REMICs): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
|
622,582 |
|
|
|
3,020 |
|
|
|
3,525 |
|
|
|
622,077 |
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
65,766 |
|
|
|
3,674 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
69,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058,465 |
|
|
|
20,987 |
|
|
|
4,313 |
|
|
|
1,075,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments-mutual funds |
|
|
12,437 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
12,353 |
|
GSE bonds |
|
|
34,988 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,033 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
119,765 |
|
|
|
2,146 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
121,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,190 |
|
|
|
2,222 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
169,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
1,225,655 |
|
|
|
23,209 |
|
|
|
4,551 |
|
|
|
1,244,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the expected maturity distribution of debt securities
available-for-sale, other than mortgage-backed securities, at June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
fair |
|
Available-for-sale |
|
cost |
|
|
value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
63,716 |
|
|
|
64,357 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
39,706 |
|
|
|
40,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
103,422 |
|
|
|
104,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturities on mortgage-backed securities may differ from contractual maturities
as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company had gross proceeds of $25.9
million and $114.4 million on sales of securities available-for-sale with gross realized gains
of approximately $886,000 and $2.5 million, and gross realized losses of $0 and $0, respectively.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company had gross proceeds of $80.9 million
and $96.1 million on sales of securities available-for-sale with gross realized gains of
approximately $785,000 and $1.0 million, and gross realized losses of approximately $0 and $0,
respectively. The Company recognized $(47,000) in losses and $139,000 in gains on its trading
securities portfolio during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. The Company
recognized $(255,000) in losses and $90,000 in gains on its trading securities portfolio during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. The Company recognized
other-than-temporary impairment charges of $248,000 and $409,000 against earnings during the three
and six months ended June 30, 2011, related to one equity investment in a mutual fund and two
private label mortgage-backed securities. The Company recognized the credit component of $248,000
in earnings and the non-credit component of $743,000 as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income, net of tax for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. The Company did
not recognize any other-than-temporary impairment charges during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010.
Activity related to the credit component recognized in earnings on debt securities for which a
portion of other-than-temporary impairment was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, is as follows (in thousands):
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
330 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Additions to the credit component on debt securities in which other-than-temporary
impairment was not previously recognized |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative pre-tax credit losses, end of period |
|
$ |
578 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities, equity investments, and corporate
bonds available-for-sale, and the estimated fair value of the related securities, aggregated by
security category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous
unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government sponsored enterprises (GSE) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
3,354 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
5,689 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
9,043 |
|
Real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICs) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
53,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
53,176 |
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
1,031 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
13,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
13,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
881 |
|
|
|
70,455 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
6,720 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
77,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GSE |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
10,126 |
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
10,126 |
|
REMICs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
|
3,525 |
|
|
|
344,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,525 |
|
|
|
344,971 |
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
13,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
13,880 |
|
Equity Investments mutual funds |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,763 |
|
|
|
363,735 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
11,364 |
|
|
|
4,551 |
|
|
|
375,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the above available-for-sale security amounts at June 30, 2011, was one
pass-through non-GSE mortgage-backed security in a continuous unrealized loss position of greater
than twelve months that was rated less than investment grade at June 30, 2011. The security had an
estimated fair value of $5.7 million (amortized cost of $6.1 million), was rated Caa2, and had the
following underlying collateral characteristics: 83% originated in 2004, and 17% originated in
2005. The rating of the security detailed above represents the lowest rating for the security
received from the rating agencies of Moodys, Standard & Poors, and Fitch. The Company continues
to receive principal and interest payments in accordance with the contractual terms of this
security. Management has evaluated, among other things, delinquency status, location of
collateral, estimated prepayment speeds, and the estimated default rates and loss severity in
liquidating the underlying collateral for this security. As a result of managements evaluation of
this security, the Company recognized during the quarter ended June 30, 2011, other than temporary
impairment of $593,000. Since management does not have the intent to sell the security and it is
more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the security, before its
anticipated recovery (which
may be maturity), the credit component of $139,000 was recognized in earnings, and the non
credit component of $454,000 was recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income,
net of tax.
In addition to the one pass-through non-GSE mortgage-backed security discussed above, the
Company had one additional private label security that was rated less than investment grade at June
30, 2011. The security, had an estimated fair value of $3.4 million (amortized cost of $3.6
million), was rated CC, and was supported by collateral which was originated in 2006. The rating
of the security detailed above represents the lowest rating for the security received from the
rating agencies of Moodys, Standard & Poors, and Fitch. The Company continues to receive
principal and interest payments in accordance with the contractual terms of this security.
Management has evaluated, among other things, delinquency status, location of collateral, estimated
prepayment speeds, and the
8
estimated default rates and loss severity in liquidating the underlying
collateral for this security. As a result of managements evaluation of this security, the Company
recognized during the quarter ended June 30, 2011, other than temporary impairment of $398,000.
Since management does not have the intent to sell the security and it is more likely than not that
the Company will not be required to sell the security, before its anticipated recovery (which may
be maturity), the credit component of $109,000 was recognized in earnings, and the non credit
component of $289,000 was recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of
tax.
The Company held one REMIC non-GSE mortgage-backed security that was in a continuous
unrealized loss position of greater than twelve months, and three corporate bonds, two pass-through
GSE mortgage-backed securities, and five REMIC mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by
GSEs, that were in an unrealized loss position of less than twelve months, and rated investment
grade at June 30, 2011. The declines in value relate to the general interest rate environment and
are considered temporary. The securities cannot be prepaid in a manner that would result in the
Company not receiving substantially all of its amortized cost. The Company neither has an intent
to sell, nor is it more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell, the securities
before the recovery of their amortized cost basis or, if necessary, maturity.
The fair values of our investment securities could decline in the future if the underlying
performance of the collateral for the collateralized mortgage obligations or other securities
deteriorates and our credit enhancement levels do not provide sufficient protections to our
contractual principal and interest. As a result, there is a risk that significant
other-than-temporary impairments may occur in the future given the current economic environment.
9
Note 3 Net Loans Held-for-Investment
Net loans held-for-investment are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
$ |
335,485 |
|
|
|
339,321 |
|
One- to- four family residential mortgage |
|
|
74,825 |
|
|
|
78,032 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
28,078 |
|
|
|
35,054 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
358,130 |
|
|
|
283,588 |
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
30,195 |
|
|
|
28,125 |
|
|
|
|
Total real estate loans |
|
|
826,713 |
|
|
|
764,120 |
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
13,974 |
|
|
|
17,020 |
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
59,037 |
|
|
|
44,517 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial, insurance premium,
and other loans |
|
|
74,711 |
|
|
|
62,599 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans held-for-investment |
|
|
901,424 |
|
|
|
826,719 |
|
Deferred loan cost, net |
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-investment, net |
|
|
902,564 |
|
|
|
827,591 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(23,520 |
) |
|
|
(21,819 |
) |
|
|
|
Net loans held-for-investment |
|
$ |
879,044 |
|
|
|
805,772 |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale amounted to $125,000 and $1.2 million at June 30, 2011, and December 31,
2010, respectively. All loans held for sale are one- to four-family residential mortgage loans.
The Company does not have any lending programs commonly referred to as subprime lending.
Subprime lending generally targets borrowers with weakened credit histories typically characterized
by payment delinquencies, previous charge-offs, judgments, bankruptcies, or borrowers with
questionable repayment capacity as evidenced by low credit scores or high debt-burden ratios.
The Company, through its principal subsidiary, the Bank, serviced $46.9 million and $52.1
million of loans at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, for Freddie Mac. These
one- to four-family residential mortgage real estate loans were underwritten to Freddie Mac
guidelines and to comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws. At the time of the
closing of these loans the Company owned the loans and subsequently sold them to Freddie Mac
providing normal and customary representations and warranties, including representations and
warranties related to compliance with Freddie Mac underwriting standards. At the time of sale, the
loans were free from encumbrances except for the mortgages filed for by the Company which, with
other underwriting documents, were subsequently assigned and delivered to Freddie Mac. At June 30,
2011, substantially all of the loans serviced for Freddie Mac were performing in accordance with
their contractual terms and management believes that it has no material repurchase obligations
associated with these loans. Servicing of loans for others does not have a material effect on our
financial position or results of operations.
We provide for loan losses based on the consistent application of our documented allowance for
loan loss methodology. Loan losses are charged to the allowance for loans losses and recoveries
are credited to it. Additions to the allowance for loan losses are provided by charges against
income based on various factors which, in our judgment, deserve current recognition in estimating
probable losses. Loan losses are charged-off in the period the loans, or portion thereof, are
deemed uncollectible. Generally, the Company will record a loan charge-off (including a partial
charge-off) to reduce a loan to the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, less cost to
sell, for collateral dependent loans. We regularly review the loan portfolio and make adjustments
for loan losses in order to maintain the allowance for loan losses in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The allowance for loan losses consists
primarily of the following two components:
|
(1) |
|
Allowances are established for impaired loans (generally defined by the Company
as non-accrual loans with an outstanding balance of $500,000 or greater). The amount
of impairment provided for as an allowance is represented by the deficiency, if any,
between the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the original
loans effective interest rate or the underlying collateral value (less estimated costs
to sell,) if the loan is collateral dependent, and the carrying value of the loan.
Impaired |
10
|
|
|
loans that have no impairment losses are not considered for general valuation
allowances described below. |
|
|
(2) |
|
General allowances are established for loan losses on a portfolio basis for
loans that do not meet the definition of impaired. The portfolio is grouped into
similar risk characteristics, primarily loan type, loan-to-value, if collateral
dependent, and internal credit risk ratings. We apply an estimated loss rate to each
loan group. The loss rates applied are based on our cumulative prior two year loss
experience adjusted, as appropriate, for the environmental factors discussed below.
This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates that may be
susceptible to significant revisions based upon changes in economic and real estate
market conditions. Actual loan losses may be significantly more than the allowance for
loan losses we have established, which could have a material negative effect on our
financial results. Within general allowances is an unallocated reserve established to
recognize losses related to the inherent subjective nature of the appraisal process and
the internal credit risk rating process. |
In underwriting a loan secured by real property, we require an appraisal of the property by an
independent licensed appraiser approved by the Companys board of directors or an automated
valuation model. The appraisal is subject to review by an independent third party hired by the
Company. We review and inspect properties before disbursement of funds during the term of a
construction loan. Generally, management obtains updated appraisals when a loan is deemed
impaired. These appraisals may be more limited than those prepared for the underwriting of a new
loan. In addition, when the Company acquires other real estate owned, it generally obtains a
current appraisal to substantiate the net carrying value of the asset.
The adjustments to our loss experience are based on our evaluation of several environmental
factors, including:
|
|
|
changes in local, regional, national, and international economic and
business conditions and developments that affect the collectibility of our
portfolio, including the condition of various market segments; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the nature and volume of our portfolio and in the terms of
our loans; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management
and other relevant staff; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of
nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified or graded
loans; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the quality of our loan review system; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral-dependent
loans; |
|
|
|
|
the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes
in the level of such concentrations; and |
|
|
|
|
the effect of other external factors such as competition and legal and
regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in our existing
portfolio. |
In evaluating the estimated loss factors to be utilized for each loan group, management also
reviews actual loss history over an extended period of time as reported by the federal regulators
for institutions both in our market area and nationally for periods that
are believed to have experienced similar
economic conditions.
We evaluate the allowance for loan losses based on the combined total of the impaired and
general components. Generally when the loan portfolio increases, absent other factors, our
allowance for loan loss methodology results in a higher dollar amount of estimated probable losses.
Conversely, when the loan portfolio decreases, absent other factors, our allowance for loan loss
methodology results in a lower dollar amount of estimated probable losses.
11
Each quarter we evaluate the allowance for loan losses and adjust the allowance as appropriate
through a provision for loan losses. While we use the best information available to make
evaluations, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if conditions differ
substantially from the information used in making the evaluations. In addition, as an integral
part of their examination process, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, as it relates to
the Bank, and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as it relates to Northfield
Bancorp, Inc, are subject to periodic examination, including review of our allowance for loan
losses. Our regulators may require us to adjust the allowance based on their analysis of
information available to them at the time of their examination. Our last examination, as of
September 30, 2010, of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and the Bank, were conducted by the Office of
Thrift Supervision, our predecessor regulator.
Activity in the allowance for loan losses is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the |
|
|
six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
21,819 |
|
|
|
15,414 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,117 |
|
|
|
4,728 |
|
Charge-offs, net |
|
|
(1,416 |
) |
|
|
(1,020 |
) |
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
23,520 |
|
|
|
19,122 |
|
|
|
|
12
The following tables set forth activity in our allowance for loan losses, by loan type,
for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and the year ended December 31, 2010, respectively. The
following tables also detail the amount of loans held-for-investment, net of deferred loan fees and
costs, that are evaluated individually, and collectively, for impairment, and the related portion
of allowance for loan losses that is allocated to each loan portfolio segment, as of June 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One -to- Four |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Lines of |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Family |
|
|
and Land |
|
|
Multifamily |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
and Industrial |
|
|
Premium |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
Allowance for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
12,654 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
|
5,137 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
21,819 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(1,198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
Provisions |
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
(734 |
) |
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
3,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance, June 30, 2011 |
|
|
13,346 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
5,814 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
23,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, June 30, 2011:
individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, June 30, 2011:
collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
|
11,021 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
5,692 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
20,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-investment, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance, June 30, 2011 |
|
|
335,520 |
|
|
|
74,915 |
|
|
|
28,097 |
|
|
|
358,887 |
|
|
|
30,431 |
|
|
|
13,977 |
|
|
|
59,037 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
902,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance, June 30, 2011
individually evaluated for impairment |
|
|
52,097 |
|
|
|
3,618 |
|
|
|
3,079 |
|
|
|
3,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance, June 30, 2011
collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
283,423 |
|
|
|
71,297 |
|
|
|
25,018 |
|
|
|
355,673 |
|
|
|
30,431 |
|
|
|
12,522 |
|
|
|
59,037 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
839,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One -to- Four |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Lines of |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Family |
|
|
and Land |
|
|
Multifamily |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
and Industrial |
|
|
Premium |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
Allowance for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
8,403 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
2,409 |
|
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
15,414 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
(2,132 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,699 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
Provisions |
|
|
5,238 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
5,403 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(1,122 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
10,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
|
12,654 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
|
5,137 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
21,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, December 31, 2010:
individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
|
2,129 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, December 31, 2010:
collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
|
10,525 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
|
|
5,016 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
19,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-investment, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
|
339,259 |
|
|
|
78,109 |
|
|
|
35,077 |
|
|
|
284,199 |
|
|
|
28,337 |
|
|
|
17,032 |
|
|
|
44,517 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
827,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, December 31, 2010:
individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
|
51,324 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
4,562 |
|
|
|
5,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, December 31, 2010:
collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
287,935 |
|
|
|
76,359 |
|
|
|
30,515 |
|
|
|
279,116 |
|
|
|
28,337 |
|
|
|
16,532 |
|
|
|
44,517 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
764,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company routinely monitors the credit quality of its loans. Credit quality is
monitored by reviewing certain key credit quality indicators. Management has determined that
loan-to-value ratios (at period end) and internally assigned credit risk ratings by loan type are
the key credit quality indicators that best help management monitor the credit quality of the
Companys loans. Loan-to-value (LTV) ratios used by management in monitoring credit quality are
based on current period loan balances and original values at time of origination (unless a current
appraisal has been obtained as a result of the loan being deemed impaired). In calculating the
provision for loan losses, management has determined that commercial real estate loans and
multifamily loans having loan-to-value ratios of less than 35%, and one- to four-family loans
having loan-to-value ratios of less than 60%, require no allowance for loan losses at each period
end. If any such loans were to default, requiring the Company to repossess the collateral, no loss
would be expected as the Company would be considered well secured.
The Company also maintains a credit risk rating system as part of the risk assessment of its
loan portfolio. The Companys lending officers are required to assign a credit risk rating to each
loan in their portfolio at origination. When the lending officer learns of important financial
developments, the risk rating is reviewed accordingly, and adjusted if necessary. Monthly,
management presents monitored assets to the loan committee. In addition, the Company engages a
third party independent loan reviewer that performs semi-annual reviews of a sample of loans,
validating the credit risk ratings assigned to such loans. The credit risk ratings play an
important role in the establishment of the loan loss provision and in confirming the adequacy of
the allowance for loan losses. After determining the general reserve loss factor for each
portfolio segment, the portfolio segment balance collectively evaluated for impairment is
multiplied by the general reserve loss factor for the respective portfolio segment in order to
determine the general reserve. Loans that have an internal credit rating of special mention or
substandard are multiplied by a multiple of the general reserve loss factors for each portfolio
segment, in order to determine the general reserve.
14
When assigning a risk rating to a loan, management utilizes the Banks internal nine-point
credit risk rating system.
|
1. |
|
Strong |
|
|
2. |
|
Good |
|
|
3. |
|
Acceptable |
|
|
4. |
|
Adequate |
|
|
5. |
|
Watch |
|
|
6. |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
7. |
|
Substandard |
|
|
8. |
|
Doubtful |
|
|
9. |
|
Loss |
Loans rated 1 through 5 are considered pass ratings. An asset is considered substandard if it
is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the
collateral pledged, if any. Substandard assets have well defined weaknesses based on objective
evidence, and are characterized by the distinct possibility the Company will sustain some loss if
the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as doubtful have all of the weaknesses
inherent in those classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present
make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable based on current
circumstances. Assets classified as loss are those considered uncollectible and of such little
value that their continuance as assets is not warranted. Assets which do not currently expose the
Company to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories, but
possess weaknesses, are required to be designated special mention.
15
The following tables detail the recorded investment of loans held-for-investment, net of
deferred fees and costs, by loan type and credit quality indicator at June 30, 2011, and December
31, 2010 (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011 |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity and |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of |
|
and |
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
One- to Four-Family |
|
and Land |
|
Multifamily |
|
Credit |
|
Industrial |
|
Premium |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
< 35% LTV |
|
=> 35% LTV |
|
< 60% LTV |
|
=> 60% LTV |
|
|
|
|
|
< 35% LTV |
|
=> 35% LTV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal Risk Rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
$ |
32,779 |
|
|
|
229,780 |
|
|
|
46,516 |
|
|
|
22,984 |
|
|
|
21,281 |
|
|
|
20,795 |
|
|
|
326,755 |
|
|
|
30,043 |
|
|
|
10,368 |
|
|
|
58,848 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
801,849 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
10,102 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,603 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,172 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
60,610 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
3,676 |
|
|
|
6,743 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
4,176 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,543 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans held-for-investment, net |
|
$ |
35,028 |
|
|
|
300,492 |
|
|
|
48,255 |
|
|
|
26,660 |
|
|
|
28,097 |
|
|
|
21,353 |
|
|
|
337,534 |
|
|
|
30,431 |
|
|
|
13,977 |
|
|
|
59,037 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
902,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity and |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of |
|
and |
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
One- to Four-Family |
|
and Land |
|
Multifamily |
|
Credit |
|
Industrial |
|
Premium |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
< 35% LTV |
|
=> 35% LTV |
|
< 60% LTV |
|
=> 60% LTV |
|
|
|
|
|
< 35% LTV |
|
=> 35% LTV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal Risk Rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
$ |
24,826 |
|
|
|
248,759 |
|
|
|
49,928 |
|
|
|
22,247 |
|
|
|
24,767 |
|
|
|
18,880 |
|
|
|
256,948 |
|
|
|
28,042 |
|
|
|
14,110 |
|
|
|
44,149 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
733,717 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
1,613 |
|
|
|
12,108 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,233 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,108 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
50,568 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
2,355 |
|
|
|
9,182 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
2,634 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
2,146 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,766 |
|
|
|
|
Total loans held-for-investment, net |
|
$ |
27,824 |
|
|
|
311,435 |
|
|
|
51,757 |
|
|
|
26,352 |
|
|
|
35,077 |
|
|
|
19,384 |
|
|
|
264,815 |
|
|
|
28,337 |
|
|
|
17,032 |
|
|
|
44,517 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
827,591 |
|
|
|
|
Included in loans held-for-investment, net, are loans for which the accrual of interest
income has been discontinued due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrowers. The
recorded investment of these nonaccrual loans was $56.0 million and $59.3 million, at June 30,
2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. Generally, loans are placed on non-accruing status when
they become 90 days or more delinquent, and remain on non-accrual status until they are brought
current, have six months of performance under the loan terms, and factors indicating reasonable
doubt about the timely collection of payments no longer exist. Therefore, loans may be current in
accordance with their loan terms, or may be less than 90 days delinquent and still be on a
non-accruing status.
16
These non-accrual amounts included loans deemed to be impaired of $47.8 million and $52.0
million at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. Loans on non-accrual status with
principal balances less than $500,000, and therefore not meeting the Companys definition of an
impaired loan, amounted to $8.2 million and $7.3 million at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010,
respectively. Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest were $2.0 million and
$1.6 million at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, and consisted of loans that are
considered well secured and in the process of collection.
17
The following tables set forth the detail, and delinquency status, of non-performing loans
(non-accrual loans and loans past due 90 or more and still accruing), net of deferred fees and
costs, at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010 (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Non-Accruing Loans |
|
|
90 Days or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 Days or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Past |
|
|
Total Non- |
|
|
|
0-29 Days |
|
|
30-89 Days |
|
|
More Past |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due and |
|
|
Performing |
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Due |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
Loans |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV => 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
25,237 |
|
|
|
3,986 |
|
|
|
15,069 |
|
|
|
44,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
25,237 |
|
|
|
3,986 |
|
|
|
15,069 |
|
|
|
44,292 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
44,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
25,237 |
|
|
|
3,986 |
|
|
|
15,647 |
|
|
|
44,870 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
45,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV => 60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
1,343 |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
1,343 |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total one-to-four family residential |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
2,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
2,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
3,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction and land |
|
|
2,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
3,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV => 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,443 |
|
|
|
2,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,443 |
|
|
|
2,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,001 |
|
|
|
3,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,491 |
|
|
|
1,491 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
1,491 |
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total insurance premium loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans, June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
28,397 |
|
|
|
4,398 |
|
|
|
23,235 |
|
|
|
56,030 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
58,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Non-Accruing Loans |
|
|
90 Days or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 Days or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Past |
|
|
Total Non- |
|
|
|
0-29 Days |
|
|
30-89 Days |
|
|
More Past |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due and |
|
|
Performing |
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Due |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
Loans |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention |
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
LTV => 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
13,650 |
|
|
|
15,050 |
|
|
|
17,659 |
|
|
|
46,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
13,650 |
|
|
|
15,050 |
|
|
|
17,659 |
|
|
|
46,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
13,679 |
|
|
|
15,050 |
|
|
|
17,659 |
|
|
|
46,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention |
|
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
987 |
|
|
LTV => 60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total one-to-four family residential |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
2,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
5,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction and land |
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
5,122 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
5,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
LTV => 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention |
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,824 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
2,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
4,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total multifamily |
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
4,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total insurance premium loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans, December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
17,790 |
|
|
|
18,874 |
|
|
|
22,617 |
|
|
|
59,281 |
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
60,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
The following tables set forth the detail and delinquency status of loans
held-for-investment, net of deferred fees and costs, by performing and non-performing loans at June
30, 2011, and December 31, 2010 (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Performing (Accruing) Loans |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-29 Days |
|
|
30-89 Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Receivable, net |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
$ |
32,052 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
32,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,779 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
32,052 |
|
|
|
2,398 |
|
|
|
34,450 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
35,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV > 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
226,501 |
|
|
|
2,783 |
|
|
|
229,284 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
229,780 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
10,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,102 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
13,947 |
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
16,318 |
|
|
|
44,292 |
|
|
|
60,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
250,550 |
|
|
|
5,154 |
|
|
|
255,704 |
|
|
|
44,788 |
|
|
|
300,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
282,602 |
|
|
|
7,552 |
|
|
|
290,154 |
|
|
|
45,366 |
|
|
|
335,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
45,830 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
46,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,516 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
46,363 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
47,336 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
48,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV > 60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
22,371 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
22,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,984 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
1,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,945 |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
3,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
24,316 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
24,929 |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
26,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total one-to-four family residential |
|
|
70,679 |
|
|
|
1,586 |
|
|
|
72,265 |
|
|
|
2,650 |
|
|
|
74,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
20,781 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
21,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,281 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
3,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,412 |
|
|
|
3,331 |
|
|
|
6,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction and land |
|
|
24,266 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
24,766 |
|
|
|
3,331 |
|
|
|
28,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
20,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,795 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
20,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,795 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
21,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV > 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
326,063 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
326,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326,755 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
5,152 |
|
|
|
1,451 |
|
|
|
6,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,603 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
|
2,443 |
|
|
|
4,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
331,387 |
|
|
|
3,704 |
|
|
|
335,091 |
|
|
|
2,443 |
|
|
|
337,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total multifamily |
|
|
352,182 |
|
|
|
3,704 |
|
|
|
355,886 |
|
|
|
3,001 |
|
|
|
358,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
28,458 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
28,552 |
|
|
|
1,491 |
|
|
|
30,043 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
28,509 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
28,603 |
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
30,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
10,231 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
10,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,368 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
1,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,758 |
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
12,056 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
12,193 |
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
13,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
58,453 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
58,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,848 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total insurance premium loans |
|
|
58,453 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
58,980 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
59,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
1,631 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other loans |
|
|
1,631 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
830,378 |
|
|
|
14,169 |
|
|
|
844,547 |
|
|
|
58,017 |
|
|
|
902,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Performing (Accruing) Loans |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-29 Days Past |
|
|
30-89 Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
|
Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Receivable, net |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
$ |
24,823 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
24,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,826 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
1,613 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
25,891 |
|
|
|
1,904 |
|
|
|
27,795 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
27,824 |
|
|
LTV > 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
242,131 |
|
|
|
6,628 |
|
|
|
248,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,759 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
11,670 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
12,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,108 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
4,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,209 |
|
|
|
46,359 |
|
|
|
50,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
258,010 |
|
|
|
7,066 |
|
|
|
265,076 |
|
|
|
46,359 |
|
|
|
311,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
283,901 |
|
|
|
8,970 |
|
|
|
292,871 |
|
|
|
46,388 |
|
|
|
339,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
48,930 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
49,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,928 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
49,013 |
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
50,770 |
|
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
51,757 |
|
|
LTV > 60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
21,429 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
22,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,247 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
2,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
24,138 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
24,956 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
26,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total one-to-four family residential |
|
|
73,151 |
|
|
|
2,575 |
|
|
|
75,726 |
|
|
|
2,383 |
|
|
|
78,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
24,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,767 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
4,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,060 |
|
|
|
5,122 |
|
|
|
9,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction and land |
|
|
29,052 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
29,551 |
|
|
|
5,526 |
|
|
|
35,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
18,656 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
18,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,880 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
18,656 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
18,880 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
19,384 |
|
|
LTV > 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
251,129 |
|
|
|
5,819 |
|
|
|
256,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,948 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
3,258 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
3,409 |
|
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
5,233 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
2,535 |
|
|
|
2,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
254,486 |
|
|
|
5,970 |
|
|
|
260,456 |
|
|
|
4,359 |
|
|
|
264,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total multifamily |
|
|
273,142 |
|
|
|
6,194 |
|
|
|
279,336 |
|
|
|
4,863 |
|
|
|
284,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
27,780 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
28,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,042 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
27,835 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
28,097 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
28,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
13,626 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
14,072 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
14,110 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
2,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
15,135 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
15,671 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
17,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
43,728 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
44,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,149 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
|
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total insurance premium loans |
|
|
43,728 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
44,388 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
44,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other loans |
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
746,903 |
|
|
|
19,798 |
|
|
|
766,701 |
|
|
|
60,890 |
|
|
|
827,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
The following tables summarize impaired loans as of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
With No Related Allowance Recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV => 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention |
|
$ |
1,791 |
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
33,429 |
|
|
|
34,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
LTV => 60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV => 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
951 |
|
|
|
951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an Allowance Recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV => 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
17,411 |
|
|
|
18,749 |
|
|
|
(2,325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV => 60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
(369 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
2,529 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV => 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
1,632 |
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
52,631 |
|
|
|
55,205 |
|
|
|
(2,325 |
) |
One-to-four family residential |
|
|
3,618 |
|
|
|
3,618 |
|
|
|
(369 |
) |
Construction and land |
|
|
3,006 |
|
|
|
3,855 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
Multifamily |
|
|
3,215 |
|
|
|
3,684 |
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63,463 |
|
|
|
67,355 |
|
|
|
(2,944 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
With No Related Allowance Recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention |
|
$ |
661 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV => 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention |
|
|
4,807 |
|
|
|
4,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
25,590 |
|
|
|
26,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
2,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV => 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention |
|
|
3,392 |
|
|
|
5,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an Allowance Recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV => 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
20,766 |
|
|
|
21,782 |
|
|
|
(2,129 |
) |
|
One-to-four family residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV => 60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
(369 |
) |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
|
3,079 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV => 35% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
1,632 |
|
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
51,824 |
|
|
|
54,120 |
|
|
|
(2,129 |
) |
One-to-four family residential |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
(369 |
) |
Construction and land |
|
|
4,562 |
|
|
|
5,495 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
Multifamily |
|
|
5,083 |
|
|
|
7,378 |
|
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63,219 |
|
|
|
68,743 |
|
|
|
(2,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the table above at June 30, 2011, are loans with carrying balances of $33.5
million that were not written down by either charge-offs or specific reserves in our allowance for
loan losses. Included in the table above at December 31, 2010, are loans with carrying balances of
$24.8 million that were not written down by either charge-offs or specific reserves in our
allowance for loan losses. Loans not written down by charge-offs or specific reserves at June 30,
2011, and December 31, 2010, are considered to have sufficient collateral values, less costs to
sell, supporting the carrying balances of the loans.
The average recorded balance of impaired loans for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, was $62.2 million and $47.9 million, respectively. The Company recorded $735,000 and $1.6
million of interest income on impaired loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011,
respectively, compared to $743,000 and $1.2 million of interest income on impaired loans for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
23
The following tables summarize loans that were modified in a troubled debt restructuring
during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Modification |
|
|
Post-Modification |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Outstanding Recorded |
|
|
Outstanding Recorded |
|
|
|
Relationships |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Troubled Debt Restructurings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
17,681 |
|
|
|
16,527 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
One -to- four Family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Troubled Debt Restructurings |
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
20,695 |
|
|
|
19,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One commercial real estate loan amounting to $3.1 million (pre-modification), which was
supported by a retail center, was restructured during the quarter ended March 31, 2011. This loan
was charged down by $1.1 million as part of the restructuring. This loan also received a reduction
to its interest rate. The second commercial real estate relationship consisted of five loans
amounting to $8.3 million (post-modification). Three of these five loans, or $3.1 million
(post-modification), were restructured during a prior quarter. The two additional loans, totaling
$5.2 million (post-modification), were restructured during the quarter ended March 31, 2011. This
entire relationship included in the table above, received a reduction in rate and certain loan
maturities in the relationship were extended. The third commercial real estate loan amounting to
$2.5 million was an owner occupied industrial building modified during the quarter ended June 30,
2011. This loan received a reduction to its interest rate. The fourth relationship amounting to
$3.8 million is supported by two properties which were comprised of an office building and a
residential property modified during the quarter ended June 30, 2011. One of the loans received a
reduction in the interest rate while the other loan was provided a forbearance agreement to allow
the owner to liquidate the property.
The one construction and land loan amounting to $405,000 received a forbearance agreement
allowing the owner to liquidate the collateral was modified during the quarter ended June 30, 2011.
The
three one -to- four family loans amounting to $791,000 each received a temporary
reduction in interest rate was modified during the quarter ended June 30, 2011.
The one commercial and industrial loan that was risk rated special mention was an unsecured
line of credit in the amount of $43,000 that matured during the quarter ended March 31, 2011. As
the borrower was unable to repay the loan in full, the Company termed out the loan over five years
at a reduced interest rate.
One commercial and industrial loan relationship that was risk rated substandard in the table
above consisted of two loans amounting to $1.7 million (pre-modification), which was supported by
an office/warehouse, a commercial property, and a personal residence. This relationship was
restructured to reduce the monthly payments for a 24-month period. The interest rates were reduced
on both loans for a 24-month period, with no forgiveness of principal. The second commercial and
industrial loan relationship that was restructured during the quarter ended March 31, 2011,
consisted of one loan amounting to $90,000 (pre-modification), secured by business assets. The
Company provided the borrower with six months to pay interest only beginning February 2011, in
order to allow the borrower time to sell the business.
Management classifies all troubled debt restructurings as impaired loans. Impaired loans are
individually assessed to determine that the loans carrying value is not in excess of the estimated
fair value of the collateral (less cost to sell), if the loan is collateral dependent, or the
present value of the expected future cash flows, if the loan is not collateral dependent.
Management performs a detailed evaluation of each impaired loan and generally obtains updated
appraisals as part of the evaluation. In addition, management adjusts estimated fair values down
to appropriately consider recent market conditions, our willingness to accept a lower sales price
to effect a quick sale,
24
and costs to dispose of any supporting collateral. Determining the
estimated fair value of underlying collateral (and related costs to sell) can be difficult in
illiquid real estate markets and is subject to significant assumptions and estimates. Management
employs an independent third party expert in appraisal preparation and review to ascertain the
reasonableness of updated appraisals. Projecting the expected cash flows under troubled debt
restructurings is inherently subjective and requires, among other things, an evaluation of the
borrowers current and projected
financial condition. Actual results may be significantly different than our projections and
our established allowance for loan losses on these loans, which could have a material effect on our
financial results.
There have not been any loans that were restructured during the last twelve months that have
subsequently defaulted during the current quarter ended June 30, 2011.
25
Note 4 Deposits
Deposits
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
Non-interest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
118,942 |
|
|
|
111,413 |
|
Interest-bearing negotiable orders of withdrawal (NOW) |
|
|
87,221 |
|
|
|
76,251 |
|
Savings-passbook, statement, tiered, and money market |
|
|
626,907 |
|
|
|
632,143 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
615,499 |
|
|
|
553,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,448,569 |
|
|
|
1,372,842 |
|
|
|
Interest expense on deposit accounts is summarized for the periods indicated (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Negotiable
order of withdrawal, savings-passbook, statement, tiered, and money market |
|
$ |
1,164 |
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
2,298 |
|
|
|
2,685 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
2,106 |
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
|
3,989 |
|
|
|
4,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,270 |
|
|
|
3,382 |
|
|
|
6,287 |
|
|
|
7,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5
Equity Incentive Plan
The following table is a summary of the Companys stock options outstanding as of June 30,
2011, and changes therein during the three months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
Stock Options |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life (years) |
|
Outstanding- December 31, 2010 |
|
|
2,072,540 |
|
|
$ |
3.22 |
|
|
$ |
9.94 |
|
|
|
8.09 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(640 |
) |
|
|
3.22 |
|
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding- June 30, 2011 |
|
|
2,071,900 |
|
|
$ |
3.22 |
|
|
$ |
9.95 |
|
|
|
7.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable- June 30, 2011 |
|
|
839,320 |
|
|
$ |
3.22 |
|
|
$ |
9.94 |
|
|
|
7.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected future stock option expense related to the non-vested options outstanding as of June
30, 2011, is $3.4 million over an average period of 2.6 years.
26
The following is a summary of the status of the Companys restricted share awards as of
June 30, 2011, and changes therein during the three months then ended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Awarded |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
653,880 |
|
|
$ |
9.97 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(165,050 |
) |
|
|
9.96 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested
at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
488,830 |
|
|
$ |
9.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected future stock award expense related to the non-vested restricted share awards as of
June 30, 2011, is $4.2 million over an average period of 2.6 years.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded $775,000 and $1.5
million of stock-based compensation related to the above plans, respectively. During the three and
six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recorded $723,000 and $1.5 million of stock-based
compensation related to the above plans, respectively.
Note 6 Fair Value Measurements
The following table presents the assets reported on the consolidated balance sheet at their
estimated fair value as of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, by level within the fair value
hierarchy as required by the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC). Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety
based on the level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value
hierarchy is as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the
measurement date. |
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These
include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted
prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not
active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or
liability (for example, interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss
severities, credit risks and default rates) or inputs that are derived principally
from or corroborated by observable market data by correlations or other means. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs Significant unobservable inputs that reflect the Companys own
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or
liabilities. |
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Measured on a recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
$ |
1,048,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,048,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
49,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
104,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equities |
|
|
9,190 |
|
|
|
9,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale |
|
|
1,212,319 |
|
|
|
9,190 |
|
|
|
1,203,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities |
|
|
4,439 |
|
|
|
4,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,216,758 |
|
|
|
13,629 |
|
|
|
1,203,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured on a non-recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage (CRE) |
|
$ |
22,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,152 |
|
One- to- four family residential mortgage |
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
2,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,474 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
|
27,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned (CRE) |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
27,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Measured on a recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE |
|
$ |
977,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
977,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GSE |
|
|
97,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
121,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
GSE bonds |
|
|
35,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equities |
|
|
12,353 |
|
|
|
12,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale |
|
|
1,244,313 |
|
|
|
12,353 |
|
|
|
1,231,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities |
|
|
4,095 |
|
|
|
4,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,248,408 |
|
|
|
16,448 |
|
|
|
1,231,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured on a non-recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
$ |
26,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,951 |
|
One- to four-family residential mortgage |
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
4,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,526 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
|
35,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned (CRE) |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
35,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale Securities: The estimated fair values for mortgage-backed, GSE and
corporate securities are obtained from an independent nationally recognized third-party pricing
service. The estimated fair
28
values are derived primarily from cash flow models, which include
assumptions for interest rates, credit losses, and prepayment speeds. Broker/dealer quotes are
utilized as well when such quotes are available and deemed representative of the market. The
significant inputs utilized in the cash flow models are based on market data obtained from sources
independent of the Company (Observable Inputs), and are therefore classified as Level 2 within the
fair value hierarchy. The estimated fair values of equity securities, classified as Level 1, are
derived from quoted market prices in active markets. Equity securities consist of mutual funds.
There were no transfers of securities between Level 1 and Level 2 during the six months ended June
30, 2011.
Trading Securities: Fair values are derived from quoted market prices in active markets. The
assets consist of publicly traded mutual funds.
Impaired Loans: At June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Company had impaired loans with
outstanding principal balances of $30.0 million and $38.4 million, which were recorded at their
estimated fair value of $27.0 million and $35.7 million, respectively. The Company recorded net
impairment charges of $1.7 million and $646,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010,
respectively. For purposes of estimating fair value of impaired loans, management utilizes
independent appraisals, if the loan is collateral dependent, adjusted downward by management, as
necessary, for changes in relevant valuation factors subsequent to the appraisal date, or the
present value of expected future cash flows for non-collateral dependent loans and troubled debt
restructurings.
Other Real Estate Owned: At June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Company had assets
acquired through foreclosure, or deed in lieu of foreclosure, of $118,000 and $171,000,
respectively, recorded at estimated fair value, less estimated selling costs when acquired, thus
establishing a new cost basis. Fair value is generally based on independent appraisals. These
appraisals include adjustments to comparable assets based on the appraisers market knowledge and
experience, and are considered Level 3 inputs. When an asset is acquired, the excess of the loan
balance over fair value, less estimated selling costs, is charged to the allowance for loan losses.
If the estimated fair value of the asset declines, a write-down is recorded through non-interest
expense. The valuation of foreclosed assets is subjective in nature and may be adjusted in the
future because of changes in economic conditions. During the three months ended March 31, 2011,
the Company transferred a loan with a principal balance of $422,000 and an estimated fair value,
less costs to sell, of $350,000 to other real estate owned. The Company charged the $72,000 excess
of the loan balance over fair value, less estimated costs to sell, to the allowance for loan
losses, utilizing Level 3 inputs during the three months ended March 31, 2011, the property was
sold during the three months ended June 30, 2011. Subsequent valuation adjustments to other real
estate owned (REO) totaled $0 and $146,000, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010
reflecting continued deterioration in estimated fair values. Operating costs after acquisition are
expensed.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The FASB ASC Topic for Financial Instruments requires disclosure of the fair value of
financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial
liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis.
The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that
are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis are discussed above. The
following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of other financial assets
and financial liabilities not already discussed above:
|
(a) |
|
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Certificates of Deposit |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents are short-term in nature with original maturities of three
months or less; the carrying amount approximates fair value. Certificates of deposit
having original terms of six-months or less; carrying value generally approximates fair
value. Certificates of deposit with an original maturity of six months or greater, the
fair value is derived from discounted cash flows. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Securities (Held to Maturity) |
|
|
The fair values for substantially all of our securities are obtained from an independent
nationally recognized pricing service. The independent pricing service utilizes market
prices of same or similar securities whenever such prices are available. Prices
involving distressed sellers are not utilized in determining fair value. Where
necessary, the independent third-party pricing service estimates fair value using models
employing techniques such as discounted cash flow analyses. The assumptions |
29
|
used in
these models typically include assumptions for interest rates, credit losses, and
prepayments, utilizing market observable data where available. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York Stock |
|
|
The fair value for Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock is its carrying value, since
this is the amount for which it could be redeemed and there is no active market for this
stock. |
|
|
(d) |
|
Loans |
|
|
Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial
characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as residential mortgage,
construction, land, multifamily, commercial and consumer. Each loan category is further
segmented into amortizing and non-amortizing and fixed and adjustable rate interest
terms and by performing and nonperforming categories. The fair value of loans is
estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current prepayment assumptions and
current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit
ratings and for the same remaining maturities. This method of estimating fair value
does not incorporate the exit price concept of fair value prescribed by the FASB ASC
Topic for Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. |
|
|
(e) |
|
Deposits |
|
|
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest-bearing demand
deposits, savings, NOW and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on
demand. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of
contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently
offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. |
|
|
(f) |
|
Commitments to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of Credit |
|
|
The fair value of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is
estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into
account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the
counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the
difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair
value of off-balance-sheet commitments is insignificant and therefore not included in
the following table. |
|
|
(g) |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
The fair value of borrowings is estimated by discounting future cash flows based on
rates currently available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturity. |
|
|
(h) |
|
Advance Payments by Borrowers |
|
|
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance have no stated maturity; the fair
value is equal to the amount currently payable. |
30
The estimated fair values of the Companys significant financial instruments at June 30, 2011,
and December 31, 2010, are presented in the following table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
|
value |
|
value |
|
value |
|
value |
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
62,907 |
|
|
|
62,907 |
|
|
|
43,852 |
|
|
|
43,852 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
4,439 |
|
|
|
4,439 |
|
|
|
4,095 |
|
|
|
4,095 |
|
Securities available-for-sale |
|
|
1,212,319 |
|
|
|
1,212,319 |
|
|
|
1,244,313 |
|
|
|
1,244,313 |
|
Securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
4,421 |
|
|
|
4,629 |
|
|
|
5,060 |
|
|
|
5,273 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of
New York stock, at cost |
|
|
8,631 |
|
|
|
8,631 |
|
|
|
9,784 |
|
|
|
9,784 |
|
Net loans
held-for-investment |
|
|
879,044 |
|
|
|
907,248 |
|
|
|
805,772 |
|
|
|
818,295 |
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
1,448,569 |
|
|
|
1,453,785 |
|
|
|
1,372,842 |
|
|
|
1,377,068 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
444,522 |
|
|
|
461,167 |
|
|
|
391,237 |
|
|
|
403,920 |
|
Advance payments by
borrowers |
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
Limitations
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market
information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any
premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Companys entire
holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion
of the Companys financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding
future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various
financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve
uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with
precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and off-balance-sheet financial instruments
without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and
liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. In addition, the tax ramifications
related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair
value estimates and have not been considered in the estimates.
Note 7
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders
by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. For purposes of
calculating basic earnings per share, weighted average common shares outstanding excludes
unallocated employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) shares that have not been committed for release
and unvested restricted stock.
Diluted earnings per share is computed using the same method as basic earnings per share, but
reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options and unvested shares of restricted
stock were exercised and converted into common stock. These potentially dilutive shares are
included in the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period using the treasury
stock method. When applying the treasury stock method, we add: (1) the assumed proceeds from
option exercises; (2) the tax benefit, if any, that would have been credited to additional paid-in
capital assuming exercise of non-qualified stock options and vesting of shares of restricted stock;
and (3) the average unamortized compensation costs related to unvested shares of restricted stock
and stock options.
31
We then divide this sum by our average stock price for the period to calculate
assumed shares repurchased. The excess of the number of shares issuable over the number of shares
assumed to be repurchased is added to basic weighted average common shares to calculate diluted
earnings per share.
The following is a summary of the Companys earnings per share calculations and reconciliation
of basic to diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands, except
share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
4,347 |
|
|
|
4,186 |
|
|
|
9,317 |
|
|
|
7,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic |
|
|
40,599,400 |
|
|
|
41,417,662 |
|
|
|
40,848,467 |
|
|
|
41,462,961 |
|
Effect of non-vested restricted stock and stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
options outstanding |
|
|
381,291 |
|
|
|
366,068 |
|
|
|
411,566 |
|
|
|
340,345 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted |
|
|
40,980,691 |
|
|
|
41,783,730 |
|
|
|
41,260,033 |
|
|
|
41,803,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-basic |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
Earnings per share-diluted |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
Note 8 Stock Repurchase Program
On October 27, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a stock repurchase
program pursuant to which the Company intends to repurchase up to 2,177,033 shares, representing
approximately 5% of its then outstanding shares. The timing of the repurchases will depend on
certain factors, including but not limited to, market conditions and prices, the Companys
liquidity and capital requirements, and alternative uses of capital. Any repurchased shares will
be held as treasury stock and will be available for general corporate purposes. The Company will
conduct such repurchases in accordance with a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. As of June 30, 2011, a
total of 1,127,096 shares were purchased under this repurchase plan at a weighted average cost of
$13.44 per share.
Note 9 Income Taxes
The Company files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and in the
State of New Jersey. The Companys subsidiary files income tax returns in the State and City of
New York, and the State of New Jersey. The State and City of New York are currently examining
our subsidiarys tax returns filed for 2007, 2008, and 2009. The Company, and its subsidiary, are
no longer subject to federal and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior
to 2007.
Note 10 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-02 amends Topic 310 and clarifies the guidance on a
creditors evaluation of whether it has granted a concession, and whether a restructuring
constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments in this update are effective for the
first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied
retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. As a result of applying these
amendments, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered impaired. For purposes of
measuring impairment of those receivables, an entity should apply the amendments prospectively for
the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. An entity should disclose
the total amount of receivables and the allowance for credit losses as of the end of the period of
adoption related to those receivables that are newly considered impaired under Section 310-10-35
for which impairment was previously measured under Subtopic 450-20, ContingenciesLoss
Contingencies. An entity should disclose the information required by paragraphs 310-10-50-33
through 50-34, which was deferred by Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-01, Receivables (Topic
310): Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update
No. 2010-20, for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The Company has
early adopted the requirements of this Accounting Standard Update as of March 31, 2011, and has
provided the applicable disclosures as part of Note 3 to these condensed financial statements. The
adoption of this Accounting Standard Update did not result in a material change to the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
32
Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-03, Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase
Agreements, amends Topic 860 (Transfers and Servicing) where an entity may or may not recognize a
sale upon the transfer of financial assets subject to repurchase agreements, based on whether or
not the transferor has maintained effective control. In the assessment of effective control,
Accounting Standard Update 2011-03 has removed the criteria that requires transferors to have the
ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the
event of default by the transferee. Other criteria applicable to the assessment of effective
control have not been changed. This guidance is effective for prospective periods beginning on or
after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is prohibited. We do not expect the adoption of this
Accounting Standard Update to have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value
Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. ASU No. 2011-04 results in a
consistent definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about
fair value between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The changes
to U.S. GAAP as a result of ASU No. 2011-04 are as follows: (1) The concepts of highest and best
use and valuation premise are only relevant when measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets
(that is, it does not apply to financial assets or any liabilities); (2) U.S. GAAP currently
prohibits application of a blockage factor in valuing financial instruments with quoted prices in
active markets. ASU No. 2011-04 extends that prohibition to all fair value measurements; (3) An
exception is provided to the basic fair value measurement principles for an entity that holds a
group of financial assets and financial liabilities with offsetting positions in market risk or
counterparty credit risk that are managed on the basis of the entitys net exposure to either of
those risks. This exception allows the entity, if certain criteria are met, to measure the fair
value of the net asset or liability position in a manner consistent with how market participants
would price the net risk position; (4) Aligns the fair value measurement of instruments classified
within an entitys shareholders equity with the guidance for liabilities; and (5) Disclosure
requirements have been enhanced for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements to disclose
quantitative information about unobservable inputs and assumptions used, to describe the valuation
processes used by the entity, and to describe the sensitivity of fair value measurements to changes
in unobservable inputs and interrelationships between those inputs. In addition, entities must
report the level in the fair value hierarchy of items that are not measured at fair value in the
statement of condition but whose fair value must be disclosed. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-04
are effective for the Companys interim reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2011.
The adoption of ASU No. 2011-04 is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The
provisions of ASU No. 2011-05 allow an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive
income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a
single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.
In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net
income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive
income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. The statement(s) are required to be presented
with equal prominence as the other primary financial statements. ASU No. 2011-05 eliminates the
option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes
in shareholders equity but does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive
income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. The
provisions of ASU No. 2011-05 are effective for the Companys interim reporting period beginning on
or after December 15, 2011, with retrospective application required. The adoption of ASU No.
2011-05 is expected to result in presentation changes to the Companys statements of income and the
addition of a statement of comprehensive income. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-05 will have no
affect on the Companys balance sheets.
Note 11 Subsequent Events
On July 6, 2011, the Company provided notice to the manager of our premium finance division
indicating that we are exercising our right to terminate the licensing agreement. We have been and
continue to negotiate amendments to the licensing agreement. If we cannot reach an agreement there
are two expected outcomes, either our existing premium finance loans will continue to receive
contractual amortization until the loans are paid in full or we may sell the portfolio. At June 30,
2011, these loans had a carrying value of $59.0 million.
On August 5, 2011, Standard and
Poors lowered the United States of Americas long-term sovereign credit
rating from AAA to AA+. This downgrade could affect the stability of residential mortgage-backed securities
issued or guaranteed by government sponsored enterprises (GSEs). These factors could affect the liquidity or
valuation of our current portfolio of residential mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by GSEs, and could
result in our counterparties requiring additional collateral for our borrowings. Further, unless and until the current
United States political, credit and financial market conditions have been sufficiently resolved, it may increase our
future borrowing costs.
33
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use
of words such as estimate, project, believe, intend, anticipate, plan, seek, and similar
expressions. These forward looking statements include:
|
|
|
statements of our goals, intentions, and expectations; |
|
|
|
|
statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth, and operating
strategies; |
|
|
|
|
statements regarding the asset quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and |
|
|
|
|
estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits. |
These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks, assumptions and
uncertainties, including, among other things, the following important factors that could affect the
actual outcome of future events:
|
|
|
the effect of the current financial economic downturn on our loan portfolio,
investment portfolio, and deposit and other customers; |
|
|
|
|
significantly increased competition among depository and other financial
institutions; |
|
|
|
|
inflation and changes in the interest rate environment or other changes that reduce
our interest margins or reduce the fair value of financial instruments; |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are
worse than expected; |
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in the securities markets; |
|
|
|
|
legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to enter new markets successfully and take advantage of growth
opportunities, and the possible dilutive effect of potential acquisitions or de novo
branches, if any; |
|
|
|
|
changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; |
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by bank regulatory
agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board and other promulgating authorities; |
|
|
|
|
inability of borrowers and/or third-party providers to perform their obligations to
us; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of recent governmental legislation restructuring the U.S. financial and
regulatory system; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of developments in the secondary market affecting our loan pricing; |
|
|
|
|
the level of future deposit insurance premiums; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in our organization, compensation, and benefit plans. |
Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially
different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
Note 1 to the Companys Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December
31, 2010, included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, as supplemented by this report,
contains a summary of significant accounting policies. Various elements of these accounting
policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions
and other subjective assessments. Certain assets are carried in the consolidated Balance Sheets at
estimated fair value or the lower of cost or estimated fair value. Policies with respect to the
methodologies used to determine the allowance for loan losses and judgments regarding the valuation
of intangible assets and securities as well as the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets
are the most critical accounting policies because they are important to the presentation of the
Companys financial condition and results of operations, involve a higher degree of complexity, and
require management to make difficult and subjective judgments which often require assumptions or
estimates about highly uncertain matters. The use of different judgments, assumptions, and
estimates could result in material differences in the results of operations or financial condition.
These critical accounting policies and their application are reviewed periodically and, at least
annually,
with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. For a further discussion of the critical
accounting policies of
34
the Company, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year
ended December 31, 2010.
Overview
This overview highlights selected information and may not contain all the information that is
important to you in understanding our performance during the period. For a more complete
understanding of trends, events, commitments, uncertainties, liquidity, capital resources, and
critical accounting estimates, you should read this entire document carefully, as well as our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Net income amounted to $4.3 million and $9.3 million for the three and six months ended June
30, 2011, as compared to $4.2 million and $7.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2010. Basic and diluted earnings per share were $0.11 and $0.23 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011, compared to $0.10 and $0.18 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, our return on average assets was 0.75% and 0.82%, as
compared to 0.80% and 0.74% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011, our return on average shareholders equity was 4.40% and 4.74%, as
compared to 4.23% and 3.86% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
We increased our assets by 2.7% to $2.31 billion at June 30, 2011, from $2.25 billion at
December 31, 2010. The increase in total assets reflected increases in loans held for investment,
net, of $75.0 million, or 9.1% and interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions of
$18.2 million, or 53.5% these significant increases were partially offset by decreases in our
security portfolio. The increase in our total assets during 2011 was funded primarily by an
increase in deposits and borrowings. Deposits increased $75.7 million to $1.45 billion at June 30,
2011, from $1.37 billion at December 31, 2010. The increase in deposits was attributable to growth
in transaction accounts and certificates of deposit issued by the Bank. Borrowed funds increased
$53.3 million to $444.5 million at June 30, 2011, from $391.2 million at December 31, 2010.
Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010
Total assets increased $60.4 million, or 2.7%, to $2.31 billion at June 30, 2011, from $2.25
billion at December 31, 2010. The increase was primarily attributable to increases in loans held
for investment, net, of $75.0 million, or 9.1% and interest-bearing deposits in other financial
institutions of $18.2 million, or 53.5%.
Cash and cash equivalents increased $19.1 million, or 43.5%, to $62.9 million at June 30,
2011, from $43.9 million at December 31, 2010. The Company routinely maintains liquid assets in
interest-bearing accounts in other well-capitalized financial institutions.
Securities available-for-sale decreased $32.0 million, or 2.6%, to $1.21 billion at June 30,
2011, from $1.24 billion at December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily attributable to
maturities and paydowns of $198.4 million, and sales of $115.8 million, partially offset by
purchases of $273.4 million and an increase of $7.9 million in net unrealized gains.
Securities held-to-maturity decreased $639,000, or 12.6%, to $4.4 million at June 30, 2011,
from $5.1 million at December 31, 2010. The decrease was attributable to maturities and paydowns
during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
The Companys securities portfolio totaled $1.22 billion at June 30, 2011, compared to $1.25
billion at December 31, 2010. At June 30, 2011, $1.05 billion of the portfolio consisted of
residential mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie
Mae. The Company also held residential mortgage-backed securities not guaranteed by these three
entities, referred to as private label securities. The private label securities had an amortized
cost of $48.3 million and an estimated fair value of $49.8 million at June 30, 2011. These private
label securities were in a net unrealized gain position of $1.5 million at June 30, 2011,
consisting of gross unrealized gains of $2.3 million and gross unrealized losses of $759,000. In
addition to the above mortgage-backed securities, the Company held $104.5 million in securities
issued by corporate entities which were all rated investment grade at June 30, 2011, and $9.2
million of equity investments in mutual funds, which focus on investments that qualify under the
Community Reinvestment Act and money market mutual funds.
Of the $48.3 million of private label securities, two securities with an estimated fair value
of $9.0 million (amortized cost of $9.8 million) were rated less than investment grade at June 30,
2011. One of the two securities
was rated CC and the other security was rated Caa2. The ratings of the securities detailed
above represent the lowest
35
rating for each security received from the rating agencies of Moodys,
Standard & Poors, and Fitch. The Company continues to receive principal and interest payments in
accordance with the contractual terms of these securities. Management has evaluated, among other
things, delinquency status, location of collateral, estimated prepayment speeds, and the estimated
default rates and loss severity in liquidating the underlying collateral for the securities rated
rate below investment grade at June 30, 2011. As a result of managements evaluation of these
securities, the Company recognized other-than-temporary impairment of $991,000 on the securities
rated below investment grade for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. Since management does not have
the intent to sell the security, and believes it is more likely than not that the Company will not
be required to sell the security, before its anticipated recovery, the credit component of $248,000
was recognized in earnings for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, and the non-credit component of
$743,000 was recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. All
other losses within the Companys investment portfolio were deemed to be temporary at June 30,
2011, and as such, were recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of
tax.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recognized an other-than-temporary
impairment charge on an equity investment in a mutual fund. The investment had been in a
continuous loss position for approximately ten months, and as a result of managements evaluation
of this security, the Company believed that the unrealized loss of $161,000 was
other-than-temporary, and as such, recognized this charge in earnings during the three months ended
March 31, 2011. There was no further impairment during the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Loans held for investment, net, totaled $902.6 million at June 30, 2011, as compared to $827.6
million at December 31, 2010. The increase was primarily in multi-family real estate loans, which
increased $74.5 million, or 26.3%, to $358.1 million at June 30, 2011, from $283.6 million at
December 31, 2010. Insurance premium loans increased $14.5 million, or 32.6%, to $59.0 million,
and home equity loans increased $2.1 million, or 7.4%, to $30.2 million at June 30, 2011. These
increases were partially offset by decreases in commercial real estate, one-to-four family
residential, land and construction, and commercial and industrial loans. Currently, management is
focused on originating multi-family loans, with less emphasis on other loan types, considering risk
profile, market demand, and related financial returns.
Bank owned life insurance increased $1.5 million, or 2.0%, from December 31, 2010 to June 30,
2011. The increase resulted from income earned on bank owned life insurance for the six months
ended June 30, 2011.
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost, decreased $1.2 million, or 11.8%, to $8.6
million at June 30, 2011, from $9.8 million at December 31, 2010. This decrease was attributable
to a decrease in borrowings outstanding with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York over the same
time period.
Premises and equipment, net, increased $1.5 million, or 9.0%, to $17.5 million at June 30,
2011, from $16.1 million at December 31, 2010. This increase is primarily attributable to
leasehold improvements made to new branches and the renovation of existing branches.
Other real estate owned decreased $53,000, or 31.0%, to $118,000 at June 30, 2011, from
$171,000 at December 31, 2010. This decrease is attributable to the sales of several properties
during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Other assets decreased $17,000, or 0.1%, to $18.0 million at June 30, 2011, from $18.1 million
at December 31, 2010. The decrease in other assets was attributable to a decrease in amounts due
to us from taxing authorities, and a decrease in prepaid FDIC insurance premiums due to
amortization related to the FDIC prepayment of insurance premiums that was made in 2009 partially
offset by an increase in prepaid expenses.
The increase in deposits for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was due in part to an increase
of certificates of deposit (issued by the Bank) of $92.7 million, or 19.1% as compared to December
31, 2010. In addition, transaction accounts increased $18.5 million, or 9.9%, from December 31,
2010 to June 30, 2011. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $5.2 million in
total savings deposits, and a decrease of $30.2 million in short-term certificates of deposit
originated through the CDARS® Network. Deposits originated through the
CDARS® Network totaled $38.2 million at June 30, 2011, and $68.4 million at December 31,
2010. The Company utilizes the CDARS® Network as a cost effective alternative to other
short-term funding sources.
Borrowings, consisting primarily of Federal Home Loan Bank advances and repurchase agreements,
increased $53.3 million, or 13.6%, to $444.5 million at June 30, 2011, from $391.2 million at
December 31, 2010.
36
The increase in borrowings was primarily the result of the Company taking advantage of the
current lower interest rate market to reduce interest rate risk, partially offset by maturities
during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Accrued expenses and other liabilities decreased $71.2 million, to $14.4 million at June 30,
2011, from $85.7 million at December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily a result of a decrease
in due to securities brokers.
Total stockholders equity increased by $1.5 million to $398.2 million at June 30, 2011, from
$396.7 million at December 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to net income of $9.3 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and an increase of $1.8 million in additional paid-in
capital primarily related to the recognition of compensation expense associated with equity awards,
and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income of $4.7 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2011. These increases were partially offset by $12.8 million in stock repurchases and the
payment of approximately $1.8 million in cash dividends.
On October 27, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a stock repurchase
program pursuant to which the Company intends to repurchase up to 2,177,033 shares, representing
approximately 5% of its then outstanding shares. The timing of the repurchases will depend on
certain factors, including but not limited to, market conditions and prices, the Companys
liquidity and capital requirements, and alternative uses of capital. Any repurchased shares will
be held as treasury stock and will be available for general corporate purposes. The Company is
conducting such repurchases in accordance with a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. As of June 30, 2011, a
total of 1,127,096 shares were purchased under this repurchase plan at a weighted average cost of
$13.44 per share.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
Net income Net income increased $161,000, or 3.9%, to $4.3 million for the quarter ended June
30, 2011, as compared to $4.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, due primarily to an
increase of $324,000 in non-interest income, and a $1.0 million decrease in the provision for loan
losses, partially offset by a decrease in net interest income of $88,000 and an increase of $1.1
million in non-interest expense.
Interest income. Interest income increased $406,000, or 1.8%, to $22.4 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2011, from $22.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The
increase was primarily due to an increase in interest income on loans of $680,000 and an increase
in interest income on mortgage backed securities of $431,000. The increase in interest income of
loans and mortgage-backed securities can be attributed to an increase in the average balances of
$119.1 million and $239.6 million, respectively. These increases in average balances were partially
offset by decreases in the yield earned on loans and mortgage-backed securities of fifty-six basis
points and sixty-four basis points, respectively. These increases were partially offset by a
decrease of $780,000 in interest income on other securities. The decrease in the interest income
earned on other securities was primarily attributable to a decrease in the average balance of
$136.2 million.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased $494,000, or 8.1%, to $6.6 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2011, from $6.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The
increase was comprised of an increase of $606,000 in interest expense on borrowings, partially
offset by a decrease in interest expense on deposits of $112,000. The increase in interest expense
on borrowings can be attributed to an increase in the average balances of borrowings of $179.8
million or 56.0% from $320.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to
$500.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, partially offset by a decrease in the cost
of seventy-four basis points from 3.42% to 2.68%. The decrease in interest expense on deposits can
be attributed to a decrease in the cost of deposits of 7 basis points from 1.08% to 1.01%,
partially offset by the increase in average balance of interest bearing deposit accounts of $48.6
million or 3.9% from $1.25 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2010, to $1.30 billion for
the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income decreased $88,000, or 0.6%, which is primarily
attributable to a twenty-six basis point decrease in the net interest rate spread from 2.91% for
the three months ended June 30, 2010, to 2.65% the three months ended June 30, 2011. Also the net
interest margin decreased thirty-three basis points to 2.90% for the three months ended June 30,
2011, as compared to 3.23% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The margin compressed due to a
decrease in the average earning asset to average cost bearing liability ratio from 125.70% for the
three months ended June 30, 2010, to 121.46% for the three months ending June 30, 2011 and the
decrease in the net interest rate spread. The general decline in yields was due to the overall low
interest rate environment and was driven by decreases in yields earned on mortgage-backed
securities and loans, as principal repayments were reinvested into lower yielding securities and
loans.
37
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses was $1.8 million for the quarter
ended June 30, 2011; a decrease of $1.0 million, or 37.5%, from the $2.8 million provision recorded
in the quarter ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in the provision for loan losses in the current
quarter was due primarily to a shift in the composition of our loan portfolio to multi-family
loans, which generally require lower general reserves than other commercial real estate loans, and
decreased levels of delinquencies. During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded
net charge-offs of $245,000 compared to net charge-offs of $822,000 for the quarter ended June 30,
2010.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income increased $324,000, or 17.4%, to $2.2 million for
the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $1.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
This increase was primarily a result of a $101,000 increase in gains on security sales, with
$886,000 in gains on security sales for the current year quarter as compared to $785,000 for the
comparable quarter in 2010, a $114,000 increase in fees and service charges for customer services,
a $208,000 decrease in trading losses on securities maintained in the Companys deferred
compensation plan, and a $232,000 increase of income earned on bank owned life insurance, generated
by increased cash surrender values, primarily resulting from higher levels of bank owned life
insurance. The Company routinely sells securities when market pricing presents, in managements
assessment, an economic benefit that outweighs holding such securities, and when smaller balance
securities become cost prohibitive to carry. These increases were partially offset by a $248,000
other-than-temporary credit impairment charge recognized on two private label mortgage-backed
securities, and a decrease of $83,000 in other income.
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased $1.1 million, or 13.3%, for the quarter
ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2010, due primarily to compensation
and employee benefits expense increasing $840,000 which resulted primarily from increases in
employees related to additional branch and operations personnel, and to a lesser extent, salary
adjustments effective January 1, 2011. Occupancy expense increased $142,000, or 12.0%, over the
same time period, primarily due to increases in rent and amortization of leasehold improvements
relating to new branches and the renovation of existing branches. Professional fees increased
$153,000, over the same time period, primarily due to increased costs related to loan workouts.
Income Tax Expense. The Company recorded income tax expense of $2.3 million for the quarters
ended June 30, 2011, and 2010. The effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, was
35.0%, as compared to 35.9% for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in the effective tax
rate was primarily a result of an increase in bank owned life insurance income.
38
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ Rate |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ Rate |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (5) |
|
$ |
876,389 |
|
|
$ |
12,778 |
|
|
|
5.85 |
% |
|
$ |
757,240 |
|
|
$ |
12,098 |
|
|
|
6.41 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,128,099 |
|
|
|
8,675 |
|
|
|
3.08 |
|
|
|
888,469 |
|
|
|
8,244 |
|
|
|
3.72 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
119,161 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
2.65 |
|
|
|
255,392 |
|
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
|
2.46 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock |
|
|
10,104 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
|
|
|
6,475 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
Interest-earning deposits in financial institutions |
|
|
52,652 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
68,078 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
2,186,405 |
|
|
|
22,438 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
|
1,975,654 |
|
|
|
22,032 |
|
|
|
4.47 |
|
Non-interest-earning assets |
|
|
141,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,327,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,088,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings, NOW, and money market accounts |
|
|
700,613 |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
670,371 |
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
598,932 |
|
|
|
2,106 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
|
580,565 |
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
|
|
1.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
1,299,545 |
|
|
|
3,270 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
1,250,936 |
|
|
|
3,382 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
500,548 |
|
|
|
3,339 |
|
|
|
2.68 |
|
|
|
320,783 |
|
|
|
2,733 |
|
|
|
3.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,800,093 |
|
|
|
6,609 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
1,571,719 |
|
|
|
6,115 |
|
|
|
1.56 |
|
Non-interest bearing deposit accounts |
|
|
120,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
10,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,931,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,691,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
396,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
2,327,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,088,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
Net interest-earning assets (3) |
|
$ |
386,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
403,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.23 |
% |
Average interest-earning assets to
interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125.70 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average yields and rates for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, are
annualized. |
|
(2) |
|
Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield
on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(3) |
|
Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total
interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(4) |
|
Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total
interest-earning assets. |
|
(5) |
|
Loans include non-accrual loans. |
39
Comparison of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
Net income Net income increased $1.8 million, or 23.1%, to $9.3 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $7.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, due
primarily to an increase of $1.7 million in non-interest income, an increase in net interest income
of $1.1 million, and a $1.6 million decrease in the provision for loan losses, partially offset by
an increase of $2.0 million in non-interest expense, and an increase of $746,000 in income tax
expense.
Interest income. Interest income increased $1.4 million, or 3.2%, to $44.4 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2011, from $43.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The
increase was primarily due to an increase in interest income on loans of $2.9 million. The increase
in interest income of loans can be attributed to an increase in the average balances of $113.1
million partially offset by a decrease in the yield earned on loans of thirteen basis points. The
increase in interest income earned on loans was partially offset by a decrease in interest income
on mortgage-backed securities and other securities of $216,000 and $1.3 million, respectively. The
decrease in interest income earned on mortgage-backed securities was primarily attributable to a
decrease in the yield earned by eighty-one basis points partially offset by an increase in the
average balance of $200.6 million. The decrease in interest earned on other securities was
primarily attributable to a decrease in the average balances of $106.2 million partially offset by
an increase of thirty-two basis points in the yield earned.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased $263,000, or 2.1%, to $12.8 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2011, from $16.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase
was comprised of an increase of $1.3 million in interest expense on borrowings, partially offset by
a decrease in interest expense on deposits of $1.0 million. The increase in interest expense on
borrowings can be attributed to an increase in the average balances of borrowings of $180.0 million
or 56.9% from $316.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $496.3 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2011, partially offset by a decrease in the cost of sixty-eight
basis points from 3.34% to 2.66%. The decrease in interest expense on deposits can be attributed
to a decrease in the cost of deposits of nineteen basis points from 1.19% to 1.00%, partially
offset by the increase in average balance of interest bearing deposit accounts of $29.6 million or
2.4% from $1.24 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2010, to $1.27 billion for the six months
ended June 30, 2011.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $1.1 million or 3.7% from $30.5 million to
$31.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This is primarily attributable to the
increase in average earning assets of $192.6 million partially offset by a 10 basis point decrease
in net interest rate spread from 2.80% for the six months ended June 30, 2010, to 2.70% the six
months ended June 30, 2011. Net interest margin decreased eighteen basis points to 2.96% for the
six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to 3.14% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The
margin compressed slightly due to a decrease in the average earning asset to average cost bearing
liability ratio from 125.97% for the six months ended June 30, 2010, to 121.92% for the six months
ending June 30, 2011. The general decline in yields was due to the overall low interest rate
environment and was driven by decreases in yields earned on mortgage-backed securities and loans,
as principal repayments were reinvested into lower yielding securities and loans.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses was $3.1 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2011; a decrease of $1.6 million, or 34.1%, from the $4.7 million provision recorded
in the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in the provision for loan losses in the
current six months was due primarily to a shift in the composition of our loan portfolio to
multi-family loans, which generally require lower general reserves than other commercial real
estate loans, and decreased levels of delinquencies. During the six months ended June 30, 2011,
the Company recorded net charge-offs of $1.4 million compared to net charge-offs of $1.0 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income increased $1.7 million, or 47.7%, to $5.3 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $3.6 million for the six months ended June
30, 2010. This increase was primarily a result of a $1.5 million increase in gains on security
sales, with $2.5 million in gains on security sales for the current six months as compared to $1.1
million for the comparable six months in 2010, a $148,000 increase in fees and service charges for
customer services, and a $550,000 increase in income earned on bank owned life insurance, generated
by increased cash surrender values, primarily resulting from higher levels of bank owned life
insurance. The Company routinely sells securities when market pricing presents, in managements
assessment,
an economic benefit that outweighs holding such securities, and when smaller balance
securities become cost prohibitive to carry. These increases were partially offset by a $409,000
other-than-temporary credit impairment charge recognized on two private label mortgage backed
securities and an equity mutual fund and a decrease of $78,000 in other income.
40
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased $2.0 million, or 11.1%, for the six
months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010, due primarily to
compensation and employee benefits expense increasing $1.2 million which resulted primarily from
increases in employees related to additional branch and operations personnel, and to a lesser
extent, salary adjustments effective January 1, 2011. Occupancy expense increased $440,000, or
18.5%, over the same time period, primarily due to increases in rent and amortization of leasehold
improvements relating to new branches and the renovation of existing branches. Professional fees
increased $214,000, over the same time period, primarily due to increased costs related to loan
workouts.
Income Tax Expense. The Company recorded income tax expense of $4.9 million and $4.2 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, respectively. The effective tax rate for the six
months ended June 30, 2011, was 34.6%, as compared to 35.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily a result of an increase in bank owned life
insurance income, partially offset by an increase in taxable income.
41
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ Rate |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ Rate |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (5) |
|
$ |
858,991 |
|
|
$ |
25,252 |
|
|
|
5.93 |
% |
|
$ |
745,891 |
|
|
$ |
22,391 |
|
|
|
6.05 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,099,390 |
|
|
|
17,092 |
|
|
|
3.14 |
|
|
|
898,788 |
|
|
|
17,308 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
Other securities |
|
|
134,822 |
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
|
|
|
241,014 |
|
|
|
3,068 |
|
|
|
2.57 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock |
|
|
10,469 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
|
|
|
6,272 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
Interest-earning deposits in financial institutions |
|
|
47,708 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
66,826 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
2,151,380 |
|
|
|
44,436 |
|
|
|
4.17 |
|
|
|
1,958,791 |
|
|
|
43,039 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
|
Non-interest-earning assets |
|
|
134,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,286,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,070,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings, NOW, and money market accounts |
|
|
697,955 |
|
|
|
2,298 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
654,026 |
|
|
|
2,685 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
570,312 |
|
|
|
3,989 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
|
584,598 |
|
|
|
4,649 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
1,268,267 |
|
|
|
6,287 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
1,238,624 |
|
|
|
7,334 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
496,276 |
|
|
|
6,549 |
|
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
|
316,315 |
|
|
|
5,239 |
|
|
|
3.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,764,543 |
|
|
|
12,836 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
1,554,939 |
|
|
|
12,573 |
|
|
|
1.63 |
|
Non-interest bearing deposit accounts |
|
|
115,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
9,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,889,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,674,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
396,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
395,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
2,286,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,070,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.80 |
|
Net interest-earning assets (3) |
|
$ |
386,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
403,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.14 |
% |
Average interest-earning assets to
interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125.97 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average yields and rates for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, are
annualized. |
|
(2) |
|
Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield
on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(3) |
|
Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total
interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(4) |
|
Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total
interest-earning assets. |
|
(5) |
|
Loans include non-accrual loans. |
42
Asset Quality
Nonperforming loans totaled $58.0 million (6.4% of total loans) as compared to $56.7 million
(6.6% of total loans) at March 31, 2011, $60.9 million (7.4% of total loans) at December 31, 2010,
$55.4 million (6.9% of total loans) at September 30, 2010, and $51.5 million (6.7% of total loans)
at June 30, 2010. The following table also shows, for the same dates, troubled debt restructurings
on which interest is accruing, and accruing loans delinquent 30 to 89 days (dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Non-accruing loans |
|
$ |
29,036 |
|
|
|
31,662 |
|
|
|
39,303 |
|
|
|
37,882 |
|
|
|
34,007 |
|
Non-accruing loans subject to
restructuring agreements |
|
|
26,994 |
|
|
|
24,136 |
|
|
|
19,978 |
|
|
|
17,261 |
|
|
|
17,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accruing loans |
|
|
56,030 |
|
|
|
55,798 |
|
|
|
59,281 |
|
|
|
55,143 |
|
|
|
51,424 |
|
Loans 90 days or more past due
and still accruing |
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
58,017 |
|
|
|
56,674 |
|
|
|
60,890 |
|
|
|
55,391 |
|
|
|
51,501 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
58,135 |
|
|
|
57,195 |
|
|
|
61,061 |
|
|
|
55,562 |
|
|
|
52,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans subject to restructuring
agreements and still accruing |
|
$ |
15,622 |
|
|
|
12,259 |
|
|
|
11,198 |
|
|
|
11,218 |
|
|
|
10,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans 30 to 89 days delinquent |
|
$ |
14,169 |
|
|
|
14,551 |
|
|
|
19,798 |
|
|
|
35,190 |
|
|
|
30,619 |
|
Total Non-Accruing Loans
Total non-accruing loans decreased $3.3 million, to $56.0 million at June 30, 2011, from $59.3
million at December 31, 2010. This decrease was primarily attributable to the following loan types
being returned to accrual status during the six months ended June 30, 2011: $1.8 million of
multifamily loans, $942,000 of commercial real estate loans, and $332,000 of one-to-four family
residential loans. Loans returned to accrual status were current as to principal and interest, and
factors indicating doubtful collection no longer existed, including the borrowers performance
under the original loan terms for at least six months. Non-accrual loans also decreased as a
result of a $612,000 of pay-offs., the transfer of a $376,000 commercial real estate loan to other
real estate owned, an additional $1.4 million of charge-offs being recorded on existing and new
non-accrual loans, and principal pay-downs of approximately $2.6 million. The above decreases in
non-accruing loans during the six months ended June 30, 2011, were partially offset by the
following loan types being placed on non-accrual status during the six months ended June 30, 2011:
$1.9 million of commercial real estate loans, $676,000 of commercial and industrial loans, $405,000
of construction and land loans, home equity loans of $155,000, and $1.7 million of one-to-four
family loans.
Delinquency Status of Total Non-accruing Loans
Generally, loans are placed on non-accrual status when they become 90 days or more delinquent,
and remain on non-accrual status until they are brought current, have a minimum of six months of
performance under the loan terms, and factors indicating reasonable doubt about the timely
collection of payments no longer exist. Therefore, loans may be current in accordance with their
loan terms, or may be less than 90 days delinquent, and still be in a non-accruing status.
43
The following tables detail the delinquency status of non-accruing loans at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Days Past Due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 to 29 |
|
|
30 to 89 |
|
|
90 or more |
|
|
Total |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
25,237 |
|
|
|
3,986 |
|
|
|
15,647 |
|
|
|
44,870 |
|
One -to- four family residential |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
2,650 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
2,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
3,331 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,001 |
|
|
|
3,001 |
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accruing loans |
|
$ |
28,397 |
|
|
|
4,398 |
|
|
|
23,235 |
|
|
|
56,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Days Past Due |
|
|
|
|
0 to 29 |
|
30 to 89 |
|
90 or more |
|
Total |
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
13,679 |
|
|
|
15,050 |
|
|
|
17,659 |
|
|
|
46,388 |
|
One -to- four family residential |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
5,122 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
4,863 |
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
Total non-accruing loans |
|
$ |
17,790 |
|
|
|
18,874 |
|
|
|
22,617 |
|
|
|
59,281 |
|
|
|
|
Loans Subject to Restructuring Agreements
Included in non-accruing loans are loans subject to restructuring agreements totaling $27.0
million and $20.0 million at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively. At June 30, 2011,
$25.5 million, or 94.4% of the $27.0 million were performing in accordance with their restructured
terms.
The Company also holds loans subject to restructuring agreements, and still accruing, which
totaled $15.6 million and $11.2 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. At
June 30, 2011, $14.1 million, or 90.0% of the $15.6 million were performing in accordance with
their restructured terms.
The following table details the amounts and categories of the loans subject to restructuring
agreements by loan type as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011 |
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Non-Accruing |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
Non-Accruing |
|
|
Accruing |
|
Troubled debt restructurings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
22,998 |
|
|
$ |
10,770 |
|
|
$ |
13,138 |
|
|
$ |
7,879 |
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
2,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily |
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
2,327 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
26,994 |
|
|
$ |
15,622 |
|
|
$ |
19,978 |
|
|
$ |
11,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing in accordance with restructured terms |
|
|
94.40 |
% |
|
|
90.00 |
% |
|
|
61.03 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing and Other Real Estate Owned
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing increased to $378,000 from $1.6 million at
December 31, 2010 to $2.0 million at June 30, 2011. Loans 90 days or more past due and still
accruing at June 30, 2011, are considered well-secured and in the process of collection. Of the
$2.0 million, $1.5 million made payments on July, 1, 2011, and $496,000 was past maturity, paying
interest in accordance with original loan terms, and in the process of renewal.
Other real estate owned amounted to $118,000 at June 30, 2011, as compared to $171,000 at
December 31, 2010.
Delinquency Status of Accruing Loans 30-89 Days Delinquent
Loans 30 to 89 days delinquent and on accrual status at June 30, 2011, totaled $14.2 million,
a decrease of $5.6 million, from the December 31, 2010 balance of $19.8 million. The following
tables set forth delinquencies for accruing loans by type and by amount at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
30 to 89 Days |
|
|
90 Days and Over |
|
|
Total |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
7,552 |
|
|
$ |
496 |
|
|
$ |
8,048 |
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
1,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,586 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
3,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,704 |
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
1,491 |
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total delinquent accruing loans |
|
$ |
14,169 |
|
|
$ |
1,987 |
|
|
$ |
16,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
30 to 89 Days |
|
|
90 Days and Over |
|
|
Total |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
8,970 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,970 |
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
2,575 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
3,683 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
903 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
6,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,194 |
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
660 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total delinquent accruing loans |
|
$ |
19,798 |
|
|
$ |
1,609 |
|
|
$ |
21,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
The following table sets forth the activity in our allowance for loan losses for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
21,819 |
|
|
|
15,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
(1,198 |
) |
|
|
(469 |
) |
One- to- four family residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(443 |
) |
Multifamily |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
Other loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
|
|
(1,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(1,416 |
) |
|
|
(1,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions (benefits) for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
One- to- four family residential |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
Construction and land |
|
|
(734 |
) |
|
|
145 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
Home equity and lines of credit |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
(942 |
) |
Insurance premium loans |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Unallocated |
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provisions for loan losses |
|
|
3,117 |
|
|
|
4,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
23,520 |
|
|
|
19,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity. The overall objective of our liquidity management is to ensure the availability of
sufficient funds to meet financial commitments and to take advantage of lending and investment
opportunities. We manage liquidity in order to meet deposit withdrawals on demand or at
contractual maturity, to repay borrowings as they mature, and to fund new loans and investments as
opportunities arise.
Our primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and
securities, borrowed funds, the proceeds from maturing securities and short-term investments, and
to a lesser extent the proceeds from the sales of loans and securities and wholesale borrowings.
The scheduled amortizations of loans and securities, as well as proceeds from borrowed funds, are
predictable sources of funds. Other funding sources, however, such as deposit inflows and loan
prepayments are greatly influenced by market interest rates, economic conditions, and competition.
Northfield Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (FHLB), which provides an
additional source of short-term and long-term funding. Northfield Bank also has borrowing
capabilities with the Federal Reserve on a short-term basis. The Banks borrowed funds, excluding
capitalized lease obligations, were $442.3 million at June 30, 2011, at a weighted average interest
rate of 2.91%. A total of $58.0 million of these borrowings will mature in less than one year.
Borrowed funds, excluding capitalized lease obligations, were $389.3 million at December 31, 2010.
The Company has the ability to obtain additional funding from the FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank
discount window of approximately $543.7 million, utilizing unencumbered securities of $604.1
million at June 30, 2011. The Company expects to have sufficient funds available to meet current
commitments in the normal course of business.
Capital Resources. At June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, Northfield Bank exceeded all
regulatory capital requirements to which it is subject.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required to Be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
Well Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required for |
|
under Prompt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
Corrective |
|
|
Actual |
|
Adequacy |
|
Action |
|
|
Ratio |
|
Purposes |
|
Provisions |
As of June 30, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible capital to
tangible assets |
|
|
13.57 |
% |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
NA |
% |
Tier 1 capital (core) (to
adjusted assets) |
|
|
13.57 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
27.51 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible capital to
tangible assets |
|
|
13.43 |
% |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
NA |
% |
Tier 1 capital (core) (to
adjusted assets) |
|
|
13.43 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
27.39 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
In the normal course of operations, the Company engages in a variety of financial transactions
that, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in the
financial statements. These transactions primarily relate to lending commitments.
47
The following table shows the contractual obligations of the Company by expected payment
period as of June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One to less |
|
Three to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
than Three |
|
less than |
|
Five Years |
Contractual Obligation |
|
Total |
|
One Year |
|
Years |
|
Five Years |
|
and greater |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Debt obligations (excluding capitalized leases) |
|
$ |
442,300 |
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
170,800 |
|
|
|
201,500 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
Commitments to originate loans |
|
$ |
52,803 |
|
|
|
52,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to fund unused lines of credit |
|
$ |
31,085 |
|
|
|
31,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to originate loans and commitments to fund unused lines of credit are
agreements to lend additional funds to customers as long as there have been no violations of any of
the conditions established in the agreements (original or restructured). Commitments generally
have a fixed expiration or other termination clauses which may or may not require payment of a fee.
Since some of these loan commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, total
commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
As of June 30, 2011, we serviced $46.9 million of loans for Freddie Mac. These one- to
four-family residential mortgage real estate loans were underwritten to Freddie Mac guidelines and
to comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws. At the time of the closing of these
loans the Company owned the loans and subsequently sold them to Freddie Mac providing normal and
customary representations and warranties, including representations and warranties related to
compliance with Freddie Mac underwriting standards. At the time of sale, the loans were free from
encumbrances except for the mortgages filed for by the Company which, with other underwriting
documents, were subsequently assigned and delivered to Freddie Mac. At June 30, 2011,
substantially all of the loans serviced for Freddie Mac were performing in accordance with their
contractual terms and management believes that it has no material repurchase obligations associated
with these loans.
For further information regarding our off-balance sheet arrangements and contractual
obligations, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
48
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
A majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Consequently, our most
significant form of market risk is interest rate risk. Our assets, consisting primarily of
mortgage-related assets and loans, generally have longer maturities than our liabilities, which
consist primarily of deposits and wholesale funding. As a result, a principal part of our business
strategy involves managing interest rate risk and limiting the exposure of our net interest income
to changes in market interest rates. Accordingly, our board of directors has established a
management asset liability committee, comprised of our Treasurer, who chairs this Committee, our
Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Operating Officer/Chief Financial Officer, our Chief Lending
Officer, and our Executive Vice President of Operations. This committee is responsible for, among
other things, evaluating the interest rate risk inherent in our assets and liabilities, for
recommending to the asset liability management committee of our board of directors the level of
risk that is appropriate given our business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and
performance objectives, and for managing this risk consistent with the guidelines approved by the
board of directors.
We seek to manage our interest rate risk in order to minimize the exposure of our earnings and
capital to changes in interest rates. As part of our ongoing asset-liability management, we
currently use the following strategies to manage our interest rate risk:
|
|
|
originating commercial real estate loans and multifamily loans that generally tend
to have shorter maturities and higher interest rates that generally reset at five
years; |
|
|
|
|
investing in shorter term investment grade corporate securities and mortgage-backed
securities; and |
|
|
|
|
obtaining general financing through lower-cost deposits and longer-term Federal Home
Loan Bank advances and repurchase agreements. |
Shortening the average term of our interest-earning assets by increasing our investments in
shorter-term assets, as well as loans with variable interest rates, helps to better match the
maturities and interest rates of our assets and liabilities, thereby reducing the exposure of our
net interest income to changes in market interest rates.
Net Portfolio Value Analysis. We compute amounts by which the net present value of our assets
and liabilities (net portfolio value or NPV) would change in the event market interest rates
changed over an assumed range of rates. Our simulation model uses a discounted cash flow analysis
to measure the interest rate sensitivity of NPV. Depending on current market interest rates we
estimate the economic value of these assets and liabilities under the assumption that interest
rates experience an instantaneous and sustained increase of 100, 200, 300, or 400 basis points, or
a decrease of 100 and 200 basis points, which is based on the current interest rate environment. A
basis point equals one-hundredth of one percent, and 100 basis points equals one percent. An
increase in interest rates from 3% to 4% would mean, for example, a 100 basis point increase in the
Change in Interest Rates column below.
Net Interest Income Analysis. In addition to NPV calculations, we analyze our sensitivity to
changes in interest rates through our net interest income model. Net interest income is the
difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and
securities, and the interest we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and
borrowings. In our model, we estimate what our net interest income would be for a twelve-month
period. Depending on current market interest rates we then calculate what the net interest income
would be for the same period under the assumption that interest rates experience an instantaneous
and sustained increase or decrease of 100, 200, 300, or 400 basis points, or a decrease of 100 and
200 basis points, which is based on the current interest rate environment.
49
The table below sets forth, as of June 30, 2011, our calculation of the estimated changes in
our NPV, NPV ratio, and percent change in net interest income that would result from the designated
instantaneous and sustained changes in interest rates. Computations of prospective effects of
hypothetical interest rate changes are based on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of
market interest rates, loan prepayments and deposit decay, and should not be relied on as
indicative of actual results (dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Change in |
|
Estimated |
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
NPV/Present |
|
Net Interest |
Interest Rates |
|
Present Value |
|
Present Value |
|
Estimated |
|
Change In |
|
Value of |
|
Income Percent |
(basis points) |
|
of Assets |
|
of Liabilities |
|
NPV |
|
NPV |
|
Assets Ratio |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
+400 |
|
$ |
2,086,473 |
|
|
$ |
1,768,516 |
|
|
$ |
317,957 |
|
|
$ |
(130,400 |
) |
|
|
15.24 |
% |
|
|
(19.50 |
)% |
+300 |
|
|
2,138,857 |
|
|
|
1,797,131 |
|
|
|
341,726 |
|
|
|
(106,631 |
) |
|
|
15.98 |
|
|
|
(14.56 |
) |
+200 |
|
|
2,202,234 |
|
|
|
1,826,703 |
|
|
|
375,531 |
|
|
|
(72,826 |
) |
|
|
17.05 |
|
|
|
(9.29 |
) |
+100 |
|
|
2,268,359 |
|
|
|
1,857,277 |
|
|
|
411,082 |
|
|
|
(37,275 |
) |
|
|
18.12 |
|
|
|
(4.31 |
) |
0 |
|
|
2,337,255 |
|
|
|
1,888,898 |
|
|
|
448,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
-100 |
|
|
2,382,808 |
|
|
|
1,919,852 |
|
|
|
462,956 |
|
|
|
14,599 |
|
|
|
19.43 |
|
|
|
(0.94 |
) |
-200 |
|
|
2,409,315 |
|
|
|
1,937,627 |
|
|
|
471,688 |
|
|
|
23,331 |
|
|
|
19.58 |
|
|
|
(4.36 |
) |
The table above indicates that at June 30, 2011, in the event of a 300 basis point
increase in interest rates, we would experience a 320 basis point
decrease in NPV ratio (19.18%
versus 15.98%), and a 14.56% decrease in net interest income. In the event of a 200 basis point
decrease in interest rates, we would experience a 40 basis point
increase in NPV ratio (19.18%
versus 19.58%) and a 4.36% decrease in net interest income. Our policies provide that, in the
event of a 300 basis point increase/decrease or less in interest rates, our net present value ratio
should decrease by no more than 400 basis points and in the event of a 200 basis point
increase/decrease, our projected net interest income should decrease by no more than 20%.
Additionally, our policy states that our net portfolio value should be at least 8.5% of total
assets before and after such shock. At June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with all board approved
policies with respect to interest rate risk management.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodologies used in determining interest rate risk
through changes in NPV and net interest income. Modeling requires making certain assumptions that
may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market
interest rates. In this regard, the NPV and net interest income information presented assume that
the composition of our interest-sensitive assets and liabilities existing at the beginning of a
period remains constant over the period being measured and assume that a particular change in
interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve regardless of the duration or
repricing of specific assets and liabilities. Accordingly, although interest rate risk
calculations provide an indication of our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in
time, such measurements are not intended to and do not provide a precise forecast of the effect of
changes in market interest rates on our net interest income and will differ from actual results.
50
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the
Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended) as of June 30, 2011. Based on that evaluation, the Companys management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures were effective.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, there were no changes in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
51
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The Company and subsidiaries are subject to various legal actions arising in the normal course
of business. In the opinion of management, the resolution of these legal actions is not expected
to have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
United States political, credit and financial market conditions may negatively affect or
impair the value of our current portfolio of residential mortgage-backed securities issued or
guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (GSEs).
As a result of
the uncertain domestic political, credit and financial market conditions, investments
in these types of financial instruments pose increased risks arising from liquidity and credit concerns.
Given that future deterioration in the United States credit and financial markets is a possibility, no
assurance can be made that losses or significant deterioration in the fair value of our investments will not
occur. Currently we have approximately $1.05 billion invested in residential mortgage-backed securities
issued or guaranteed by GSEs. On August 5, 2011, Standard and Poors lowered the United States of
Americas long-term sovereign credit rating from AAA
to AA+. This downgrade could affect the
stability of residential mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by GSEs. These factors could
affect the liquidity or valuation of our current portfolio of residential mortgage-backed securities issued or
guaranteed by GSEs, and could result in our counterparties requiring additional collateral for our
borrowings. Further, unless and until the current United States political, credit and financial market
conditions have been sufficiently resolved, it may increase our future borrowing costs.
Except as disclosed above
or in documents we have previously filed with the SEC, there have been no
material changes to the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010, as filed with the SEC.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
|
(a) |
|
Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities. There were no sales of unregistered securities
during the period covered by this report. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Use of Proceeds. Not applicable |
|
|
(c) |
|
Repurchases of Our Equity Securities. |
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the Companys repurchase of its common stock for each calendar
month in the three months ended June 30, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
(d) Maximum Number |
|
|
|
(a) Total Number |
|
|
(b) Average |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
of Shares that May Yet |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid per |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Be Purchased Under |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Share |
|
|
or Programs (1) |
|
|
Plans or Programs (1) |
|
April 1, 2011, through April 30, 2011 |
|
|
274,043 |
|
|
$ |
13.72 |
|
|
|
274,043 |
|
|
|
1,321,423 |
|
May 1,
2011, through May 31, 2011 |
|
|
121,070 |
|
|
|
13.70 |
|
|
|
120,250 |
|
|
|
1,201,173 |
|
June 1,
2011, through June 30, 2011 |
|
|
151,553 |
|
|
|
13.81 |
|
|
|
151,236 |
|
|
|
1,049,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
546,666 |
|
|
$ |
13.74 |
|
|
|
545,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On October 27, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a stock
repurchase program pursuant to which the Company intends to repurchase up to 2,177,033
shares, representing approximately 5% of its then outstanding shares. The timing of the
repurchases will depend on certain factors, including but not limited to, market conditions
and prices, the Companys liquidity and capital requirements, and |
52
|
|
|
|
|
alternative uses of
capital. Any repurchased shares will be held as treasury stock and will be available for
general corporate purposes. The Company is conducting such repurchases in accordance with
a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. |
|
|
As of June 30, 2011, under its current repurchase plan, the Company has repurchased
1,127,096 shares of its stock at an average price of $13.44 per share. The Company has
repurchased a total of 3,211,040 shares of its common stock (under its current and prior
repurchase plans) at an average price of $12.49 per share. |
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
[REMOVED AND RESERVED] |
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
None
The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are included with this Form 10-Q and are
listed on the Index to Exhibits immediately following the Signatures.
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
Date: August 9, 2011
|
|
|
|
/s/ John W. Alexander
|
|
|
John W. Alexander |
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven M. Klein
|
|
|
Steven M. Klein |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
54
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of John W. Alexander, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Steven M. Klein, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of John W. Alexander, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
and Steven M. Klein, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
55