e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 001-08430
McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
REPUBLIC OF PANAMA
|
|
72-0593134 |
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
777 N. ELDRIDGE PKWY
HOUSTON, TEXAS
|
|
77079 |
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code (281) 870-5901
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number
of shares of the registrants common stock outstanding at April 27, 2007 was 111,276,974.
McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
INDEX FORM 10-Q
2
PART I
McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
685,054 |
|
|
$ |
600,843 |
|
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (Note 10) |
|
|
114,560 |
|
|
|
106,674 |
|
Investments |
|
|
120,575 |
|
|
|
172,171 |
|
Accounts receivable trade, net |
|
|
812,037 |
|
|
|
668,310 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
30,220 |
|
|
|
29,825 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable other |
|
|
43,524 |
|
|
|
48,041 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
283,293 |
|
|
|
9,507 |
|
Contracts in progress |
|
|
257,291 |
|
|
|
230,146 |
|
Inventories (Note 1) |
|
|
85,548 |
|
|
|
77,769 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
161,846 |
|
|
|
180,234 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
37,784 |
|
|
|
29,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
2,631,732 |
|
|
|
2,153,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
|
1,567,657 |
|
|
|
1,525,187 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
1,027,708 |
|
|
|
1,011,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
|
539,949 |
|
|
|
513,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
119,258 |
|
|
|
121,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
89,201 |
|
|
|
89,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
248,756 |
|
|
|
260,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Income Tax Receivable |
|
|
26,153 |
|
|
|
299,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
209,758 |
|
|
|
195,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
3,864,807 |
|
|
$ |
3,633,762 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
256,461 |
|
|
$ |
257,492 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
388,986 |
|
|
|
407,094 |
|
Accrued employee benefits |
|
|
199,193 |
|
|
|
246,182 |
|
Accrued liabilities other |
|
|
279,936 |
|
|
|
264,839 |
|
Accrued contract cost |
|
|
106,211 |
|
|
|
110,992 |
|
Advance billings on contracts |
|
|
1,269,457 |
|
|
|
1,116,118 |
|
U.S. and foreign income taxes payable |
|
|
53,669 |
|
|
|
66,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
2,553,913 |
|
|
|
2,469,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
10,904 |
|
|
|
15,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation |
|
|
98,730 |
|
|
|
100,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self-Insurance |
|
|
83,378 |
|
|
|
84,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Liability |
|
|
352,332 |
|
|
|
372,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
154,406 |
|
|
|
148,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $1.00 per share, authorized
150,000,000 shares; issued 114,235,860 at March 31, 2007
and 113,897,309 at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
114,236 |
|
|
|
113,897 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
1,229,906 |
|
|
|
1,214,282 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(312,791 |
) |
|
|
(458,886 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost, 3,089,675 shares at March 31, 2007
and 3,012,709 at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
(64,616 |
) |
|
|
(60,581 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(355,591 |
) |
|
|
(365,611 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
611,144 |
|
|
|
443,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
3,864,807 |
|
|
$ |
3,633,762 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,363,430 |
|
|
$ |
644,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
1,082,066 |
|
|
|
501,726 |
|
(Gains) Losses on asset disposals and impairments net |
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
|
|
16,006 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
97,762 |
|
|
|
66,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,178,193 |
|
|
|
584,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in Income of Investees |
|
|
7,241 |
|
|
|
7,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
192,478 |
|
|
|
67,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
12,318 |
|
|
|
7,535 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(9,589 |
) |
|
|
(10,303 |
) |
IRS interest expense adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,210 |
|
Other expense net |
|
|
(3,870 |
) |
|
|
(1,561 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,141 |
) |
|
|
8,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations
before Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
191,337 |
|
|
|
76,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
|
33,276 |
|
|
|
20,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations |
|
|
158,061 |
|
|
|
56,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
158,061 |
|
|
$ |
55,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
Loss from Discontinued Operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
Net Income |
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
Loss from Discontinued Operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
Net Income |
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
158,061 |
|
|
$ |
55,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for impairment of investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,448 |
|
Reconsolidation of The Babcock & Wilcox Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,833 |
|
Unrealized gains on derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on derivative financial instruments |
|
|
2,141 |
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income |
|
|
(1,169 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
Reconsolidation of The Babcock & Wilcox Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(269 |
) |
Amortization of benefit plan costs |
|
|
7,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment attributable to
the reconsolidation of The Babcock & Wilcox Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,578 |
|
Unrealized gains on investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains arising during the period |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for net losses included in net income |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
10,020 |
|
|
|
49,253 |
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
$ |
168,081 |
|
|
$ |
104,576 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
158,061 |
|
|
$ |
55,323 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
16,538 |
|
|
|
11,694 |
|
Income of investees, less dividends |
|
|
(319 |
) |
|
|
(1,399 |
) |
(Gains) losses on asset disposals and impairments net |
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
|
|
16,006 |
|
Provision for deferred taxes |
|
|
28,880 |
|
|
|
70,022 |
|
Excess tax benefits from FAS 123(R) stock-based compensation |
|
|
(6,784 |
) |
|
|
(4,918 |
) |
Other |
|
|
6,164 |
|
|
|
13,526 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(139,263 |
) |
|
|
142,031 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
(56,365 |
) |
Net contracts in progress and advance billings on contracts |
|
|
125,833 |
|
|
|
7,005 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(15,937 |
) |
|
|
(46,901 |
) |
Income taxes |
|
|
(26,807 |
) |
|
|
6,463 |
|
Accrued and other current liabilities |
|
|
10,376 |
|
|
|
(5,238 |
) |
Accrued employee benefits |
|
|
(49,267 |
) |
|
|
(25,264 |
) |
Pension liability |
|
|
(7,426 |
) |
|
|
6,787 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(23,677 |
) |
|
|
(47,935 |
) |
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
74,584 |
|
|
|
140,837 |
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(7,886 |
) |
|
|
13,672 |
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(45,504 |
) |
|
|
(29,037 |
) |
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(275,709 |
) |
|
|
(5,131,607 |
) |
Maturities of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
238,916 |
|
|
|
4,984,734 |
|
Sales of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
92,657 |
|
|
|
68,088 |
|
Proceeds from asset disposals |
|
|
2,203 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
Cash acquired from the reconsolidation of The Babcock & Wilcox Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,200 |
|
Other |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
(1,732 |
) |
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
4,844 |
|
|
|
69,192 |
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
592 |
|
Payment of long-term debt |
|
|
(5,375 |
) |
|
|
(4,323 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
2,471 |
|
|
|
9,347 |
|
Payment of debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from FAS 123(R) stock-based compensation |
|
|
6,784 |
|
|
|
4,918 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,519 |
) |
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
3,880 |
|
|
|
2,999 |
|
|
EFFECTS OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH |
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
84,211 |
|
|
|
213,168 |
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
600,843 |
|
|
|
19,263 |
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
685,054 |
|
|
$ |
232,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (net of amount capitalized) |
|
$ |
11,594 |
|
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
Income taxes (net of refunds) |
|
$ |
21,487 |
|
|
$ |
6,937 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
8
McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2007
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
We have presented our condensed consolidated financial statements in U.S. dollars in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for interim
financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and GAAP footnotes
required for complete financial statements. We have included all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation. These condensed consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of McDermott International, Inc. and its subsidiaries and
controlled joint ventures consistent with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised December 2003).
We use the equity method to account for investments in joint ventures and other entities we do not
control, but over which we have significant influence. We have eliminated all significant
intercompany transactions and accounts. We have reclassified certain amounts previously reported
to conform to the presentation at March 31, 2007 and for the three months ended March 31, 2007,
primarily related to our adoption of a new accounting principle for drydocking costs, as discussed
further below. We present the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements on the
basis of continuing operations, unless otherwise stated.
McDermott International, Inc. (MII), incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Panama
in 1959, is an engineering and construction company with specialty manufacturing and service
capabilities and is the parent company of the McDermott group of companies, which includes:
|
|
|
J. Ray McDermott, S.A., a Panamanian subsidiary of MII (JRMSA), and its consolidated
subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
McDermott Holdings, Inc., a Delaware subsidiary of MII (MHI), and its consolidated
subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
J. Ray McDermott Holdings, LLC, a Delaware subsidiary of MHI (JRMH), and its
consolidated subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
McDermott Incorporated, a Delaware subsidiary of MHI (MI), and its consolidated
subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
The Babcock & Wilcox Companies, a Delaware subsidiary of MI (B&WC), and its
consolidated subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
BWX Technologies, Inc., a Delaware subsidiary of B&WC (BWXT), and its consolidated
subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
|
The Babcock & Wilcox Company, a Delaware subsidiary of B&WC (B&W), and its
consolidated subsidiaries. |
We operate in three business segments:
|
|
|
Offshore Oil and Gas Construction includes the results of operations of JRMSA and its
subsidiaries and JRMH and its subsidiaries, which we refer to collectively as JRM, which
supply services primarily to offshore oil and gas field developments worldwide. This
segments principal activities include the front-end design and detailed engineering,
fabrication and installation of offshore drilling and production facilities and
installation of marine pipelines and subsea production systems. This segment operates in
most major offshore oil and gas producing regions throughout the world, including the
United States, Mexico, the Middle East, India, the Caspian Sea and Asia Pacific. |
|
|
|
|
Government Operations includes the results of operations of BWXT and its subsidiaries.
This segment supplies nuclear components and provides various services to the U.S.
Government, including uranium processing, environmental site restoration services and
management and operating services for various U.S. Government-owned facilities, primarily
within the nuclear weapons complex of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). |
|
|
|
|
Power Generation Systems primarily includes the results of operations of B&W and its
subsidiaries. B&W is a leading supplier of fossil-fired steam generating systems,
replacement commercial nuclear steam generators, environmental equipment and components,
and related services to customers around the world. It designs, engineers, manufactures and
services large utility and industrial power generation systems, including boilers used to
generate steam in electric power plants, pulp and paper making, chemical and process
applications and other industrial uses. On February 22, 2006, B&W and three of its
subsidiaries exited from their asbestos-related Chapter 11 Bankruptcy proceedings that were
commenced on February 22, 2000. Due to the |
9
|
|
|
Chapter 11 proceedings, we did not consolidate B&Ws and its subsidiaries results of operations in our consolidated financial statements
from February 22, 2000 through February 22, 2006. |
In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, unless the context otherwise indicates, we, us and
our mean MII and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007. For further information,
refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Inventories
Inventories are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
Raw Materials and Supplies |
|
$ |
61,493 |
|
|
$ |
56,955 |
|
Work in Progress |
|
|
10,319 |
|
|
|
7,453 |
|
Finished Goods |
|
|
13,736 |
|
|
|
13,361 |
|
|
Total Inventories |
|
$ |
85,548 |
|
|
$ |
77,769 |
|
|
Adoption of New Accounting Principle for Drydock Costs
Through December 31, 2006, we accrued estimated drydocking costs, including labor, raw
materials, equipment and regulatory fees, for our marine fleet over the period of time between
drydockings, which is generally three to five years. We accrued drydocking costs in advance of the
anticipated future drydocking, in accordance with the method commonly known as the
accrue-in-advance method. Actual drydocking costs were charged against the liability when
incurred, and any differences between actual costs and accrued costs were recognized over the
remaining months of the drydocking cycle. Pursuant to FASB Staff Position (FSP) AUG AIR-1,
Accounting for Planned Major Maintenance Activities, issued during September 2006, we changed our
accounting policy from the accrue-in-advance method to the deferral method, effective January 1,
2007. This FSP requires that all periods presented in our consolidated financial statements
reflect the period-specific adjustments of applying the new accounting principle. As a result of
applying this change, we have restated our condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31,
2006 for an increase to assets and stockholders equity of approximately $39.6 million and $54.7
million, respectively, and a decrease to liabilities of approximately $15.1 million. Additionally,
we have restated our condensed consolidated statement of income for the three months ended March
31, 2006 to reflect a decrease in our cost of operations of approximately $1.2 million.
Recent Pronouncements
There have been no material changes to the recent pronouncements discussed in our annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
NOTE 2 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006 include the operations of
our Mexican subsidiary, Talleres Navales del Golfo, S.A. de C.V., a component of our Offshore Oil
and Gas Construction segment, which was sold in April 2006.
NOTE 3 INCOME TAXES
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). As a result of this adoption, we
recognized a charge of approximately $12 million to our accumulated deficit component of
stockholders equity. Additionally, as of the adoption date, we had gross tax-effected
unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $70 million, of which approximately $68 million would
impact our effective tax rate if recognized.
As part of the adoption of FIN 48, we will begin to recognize interest and penalties related
to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. As of January 1, 2007, we have recorded a
liability of approximately $27 million for the payment of tax-related interest and penalties.
10
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we recorded an additional FIN 48 liability
of $1.5 million, including estimated tax-related interest and penalties.
We conduct business globally, and as a result, we or one or more of our subsidiaries files
income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions.
In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout
the world, including such major jurisdictions as Canada, Indonesia, Malaysia, China, Singapore,
Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, India, Qatar, Azerbaijan and the United States. With few exceptions, we are
no longer subject to non-U.S. tax examinations for years prior to 2000.
The MI and JRMH groups are currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS)
for the 1993 through 2004 and 1996 through 2003 tax years, respectively. The IRS examination of
the years 1993 through 2003 for the MI group is completed, and the unresolved issues are awaiting
an appellate conference with the IRS. The IRS examination of the years 1996 through 2003 for the
JRMH group is complete and is pending review by the Joint Committee on Taxation. We have been
notified that the 2004 tax year for the MI group is to be subject to a limited scope audit by the
IRS, which is to begin within the next 12 months. It is anticipated that a settlement with the IRS
for all years under audit may be reached within the next 12 months.
State income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of three to five
years after filing the respective returns. With few exceptions, most notably the Commonwealth of
Virginia, we do not have any state returns under examination for years prior to 2000. The
Commonwealth of Virginia returns are under audit for the 1990 through 1993 and 1999 tax years, all
of which we expect will be resolved within the next 12 months. We expect that any assessments
under the remaining audits will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE 4 PENSION PLANS AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
Components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
Other Benefits |
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
9,997 |
|
|
$ |
2,730 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
36,390 |
|
|
|
11,533 |
|
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(42,638 |
) |
|
|
(11,943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Amortization of transition obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
10,533 |
|
|
|
9,281 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
15,104 |
|
|
$ |
11,780 |
|
|
$ |
2,418 |
|
|
$ |
1,739 |
|
|
NOTE 5 ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss included in stockholders equity are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
Currency Translation Adjustments |
|
$ |
12,524 |
|
|
$ |
11,404 |
|
Net Unrealized Gain on Investments |
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
Net Unrealized Gain on Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
10,416 |
|
|
|
9,444 |
|
Unrecognized Losses on Benefit Obligations |
|
|
(379,338 |
) |
|
|
(386,989 |
) |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
$ |
(355,591 |
) |
|
$ |
(365,611 |
) |
|
NOTE 6 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Investigations and Litigation
Other than as noted below, there have been no material changes in the status of the legal
proceedings disclosed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II of our annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
11
Other Litigation and Settlements
In the proceeding entitled Iroquois Falls Power Corp v. Jacobs Canada Inc., et al., filed in
the Superior Court of Justice, in Ontario, Canada and alleging damages of approximately $16 million
(Canadian) for remedial work, loss of profits and related engineering/redesign costs due to the
alleged breach by one of our former subsidiaries of its engineering design obligations relating to
the supply and installation of heat recovery steam generators, MI, which provided a guarantee to
certain obligations of that former subsidiary, and two bonding companies, with whom MII entered
into an indemnity arrangement, were also named as defendants. On March 20, 2007, the Court
granted summary judgment in favor of all defendants and dismissed all claims of Iroquois Falls
Power Corp. On April 5, 2007, Iroquois Falls Power Corp. filed a notice of appeal.
In the proceeding entitled Antoine, et al. v. J. Ray McDermott, Inc., et al., filed in the
24th Judicial District Court, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana by approximately 88 plaintiffs
against approximately 215 defendants, including J. Ray McDermott, Inc. (JRMI) and Delta Hudson Engineering Corporation, another affiliate of
ours, the Court dismissed the Plaintiffs claims on January 10, 2007, without prejudice to their
right to refile. On January 29, 2007, in a matter entitled Boudreaux, et al v. McDermott, Inc., et
al, originally filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, 21
plaintiffs originally named in the Antoine matter filed suit against JRMI, MI and approximately 30
other employer defendants, alleging Jones Act seaman status and generally alleging exposure to
welding fumes, solvents, dyes, industrial paints and noise. On May 2, 2007, Boudreaux was
transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Additionally, on January 29, 2007, in a matter entitled Antoine, et al. v. McDermott, Inc., et al.,
filed in the 164th Judicial District Court for Harris County, Texas, 43 plaintiffs
originally named in the Antoine Louisiana State Court action filed suit against JRMI, MI and
approximately 65 other employer defendants and 42 maritime products defendants, alleging Jones Act
seaman status and generally alleging personal injuries for exposure to asbestos and noise. The
Plaintiffs seek monetary damages in an unspecified amount in both cases and attorneys fees in the
new Antoine case. We intend to continue to vigorously defend these claims.
Other
We have been advised by the IRS of potential proposed unfavorable tax adjustments related to
the 2001 through 2003 tax years. We have reviewed the IRS positions and disagree with certain
proposed adjustments. Accordingly, we have filed a protest with the IRS regarding the resolution
of these issues. We have provided for amounts that we believe will be ultimately payable under the
proposed adjustments; however, these proposed IRS adjustments, should they be sustained, would
result in a tax liability of approximately $15 million in excess of amounts provided for in our
condensed consolidated financial statements.
The reorganization of the MI and JRMH U.S. tax groups, which was completed on December 31,
2006, resulted in a material, favorable impact on our consolidated financial results for the year
ended December 31, 2006. Although we believe that the tax result of the reorganization as reported
in our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006 is accurate, the tax
results derived will likely be subject to audit, or other challenge, by the IRS. Should the IRS
interpretation of the tax law in this regard differ from our interpretation, such that adjustments
are proposed or sustained by the IRS, there could be a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial results as reported and our expected future cash flows.
For a detailed description of these and other pending proceedings, please refer to Notes 10
and 20 to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II of our annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Additionally, due to the nature of our business, we are, from time to time, involved in
routine litigation or subject to disputes or claims related to our business activities, including,
among other things:
|
|
|
performance-related or warranty-related matters under our customer and supplier
contracts and other business arrangements; and |
|
|
|
|
workers compensation claims, Jones Act claims, premises liability claims and other
claims. |
In our managements opinion, based upon our prior experience, none of these other litigation
proceedings, disputes and claims are expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
12
NOTE 7 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Total stock-based compensation expense recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2007
and 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comp |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Impact |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, 2007
|
Stock Options |
|
$ |
911 |
|
|
$ |
(274 |
) |
|
$ |
637 |
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
65 |
|
Performance Shares |
|
|
2,997 |
|
|
|
(957 |
) |
|
|
2,040 |
|
Performance Units |
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
4,643 |
|
|
$ |
(1,469 |
) |
|
$ |
3,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, 2006
|
Stock Options |
|
$ |
1,139 |
|
|
$ |
(258 |
) |
|
$ |
881 |
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
145 |
|
Performance Units |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
(1,499 |
) |
|
|
4,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
7,123 |
|
|
$ |
(1,796 |
) |
|
$ |
5,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 8 SEGMENT REPORTING
An analysis of our operations by segment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006(2) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore Oil and Gas Construction |
|
$ |
550,269 |
|
|
$ |
295,439 |
|
Government Operations |
|
|
161,399 |
|
|
|
160,999 |
|
Power Generation Systems |
|
|
655,414 |
|
|
|
189,023 |
|
Adjustments and Eliminations(1) |
|
|
(3,652 |
) |
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
1,363,430 |
|
|
$ |
644,907 |
|
|
(1)Segment revenues are net of the following
intersegment transfers and other adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore Oil and Gas Construction Transfers |
|
$ |
3,497 |
|
|
$ |
486 |
|
Government Operations Transfers |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Power Generation Systems Transfers |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,652 |
|
|
$ |
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Our Power Generation Systems segment for
the three months ended March 31, 2006 includes
approximately one month (March 2006) of results
attributable to B&W. We began consolidating the results of
B&W when B&W emerged from bankruptcy, effective February
22, 2006. B&Ws revenues and operating income included in
the three months ended March 31, 2006 total approximately
$189.0 million and $26.3 million, respectively. |
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006(2) |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Operating Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore Oil and Gas Construction |
|
$ |
122,015 |
|
|
$ |
38,899 |
|
Government Operations |
|
|
26,665 |
|
|
|
19,912 |
|
Power Generation Systems |
|
|
41,866 |
|
|
|
25,748 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
190,546 |
|
|
$ |
84,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (Losses) on Asset Disposals and
Impairments Net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore Oil and Gas Construction |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(16,050 |
) |
Government Operations |
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
Power Generation Systems |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,635 |
|
|
$ |
(16,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in Income (Loss) of Investees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore Oil and Gas Construction |
|
$ |
(813 |
) |
|
$ |
(666 |
) |
Government Operations |
|
|
6,473 |
|
|
|
6,453 |
|
Power Generation Systems |
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,241 |
|
|
$ |
7,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore Oil and Gas Construction |
|
$ |
121,203 |
|
|
$ |
22,183 |
|
Government Operations |
|
|
34,755 |
|
|
|
26,365 |
|
Power Generation Systems |
|
|
43,464 |
|
|
|
27,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
199,422 |
|
|
|
76,100 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(6,944 |
) |
|
|
(8,372 |
) |
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
192,478 |
|
|
$ |
67,728 |
|
|
14
NOTE 9 EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(In thousands, except shares and |
|
|
per share amounts) |
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for basic computation |
|
$ |
158,061 |
|
|
$ |
55,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares |
|
|
110,794,813 |
|
|
|
107,367,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for diluted computation |
|
$ |
158,061 |
|
|
$ |
55,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares (basic) |
|
|
110,794,813 |
|
|
|
107,367,945 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options, restricted stock and
performance shares |
|
|
3,424,393 |
|
|
|
5,586,984 |
|
|
Adjusted weighted average common shares
and assumed conversions |
|
|
114,219,206 |
|
|
|
112,954,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
NOTE 10 RESTRICTED CASH
At March 31, 2007, we had restricted cash and cash equivalents totaling $114.6 million, of
which $1.1 million is required to meet reinsurance reserve requirements of our captive insurance
companies and $113.5 million is held in restricted foreign accounts.
NOTE 11 SUBSEQUENT EVENT
Contract Termination and Settlement
As disclosed in Parts I and II of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2006, B&W received notice from TXU Generation Development Company LLC (TXU) to suspend
activity on five of the eight supercritical coal-fired boilers and selective catalytic reduction
systems that were originally planned for TXUs solid-fuel power generation program in Texas. At
December 31, 2006, the value of all eight units was excluded from our consolidated backlog, as TXU
announced it did not intend to pursue any of these projects. In the three months ended March 31,
2007, B&W recognized revenues based on percentage-of-completion accounting for these eight units
totaling approximately $110 million.
On April 13, 2007, B&W and TXU entered into a termination and settlement agreement on the five
suspended units. Under this settlement agreement, B&W received a payment from TXU of approximately
$79 million in April 2007, which completes TXUs $243 million financial obligation to B&W related
to units four through eight, other than ongoing storage and commission expenses. B&W will record
the termination and settlement in the three months ending June 30, 2007 and expects to record
additional revenues totaling approximately $120 million as a result of completion of the
settlement.
B&W is continuing to fulfill its contracts to supply the three units not covered by the
termination and settlement agreement, and TXU and B&W have agreed to cooperate in the marketing and
modification of these units, as may be necessary, to help meet expanding U.S. electrical power
demands. Consistent with our treatment at December 31, 2006, we have excluded the dollar value of
these three units from our consolidated ending backlog at March 31,
15
2007, as TXU still does not
intend to use these units and a new buyer has not yet contracted to purchase these units. We
believe if a new buyer does not emerge, TXU will likely terminate these units.
Tax Refund
On April 12, 2007, MI received a $272 million federal tax refund from the IRS. This federal
tax refund resulted from carrying back to prior tax years the tax loss generated in 2006, primarily
as a result of the $955 million of asbestos-related payments made during 2006 in connection with
the settlement of B&Ws Chapter 11 reorganization proceedings. A number of these prior tax years
are currently open and, therefore, certain adjustments may still occur before final settlement of
these tax years.
Retirement of Debt
On April 12, 2007, B&W retired the $250 million term loan portion of its credit facility.
Under the terms of the facility, B&W had the right to prepay without penalty.
Acquisition of Marine Mechanical Corporation
On May 1, 2007, BWXT completed the previously announced acquisition of Marine Mechanical
Corporation (MMC) for approximately $75 million. MMC, headquartered in Euclid, Ohio, designs,
manufactures and supplies electro-mechanical equipment used by the United States Navy.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The following information should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included under Item 1 and the audited
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and Item 7 Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, unless the context otherwise indicates, we, us and
our mean MII and its consolidated subsidiaries.
We are including the following discussion to inform our existing and potential security
holders generally of some of the risks and uncertainties that can affect our company and to take
advantage of the safe harbor protection for forward-looking statements that applicable federal
securities law affords.
From time to time, our management or persons acting on our behalf make forward-looking
statements to inform existing and potential security holders about our company. These statements
may include projections and estimates concerning the timing and success of specific projects and
our future backlog, revenues, income and capital spending. Forward-looking statements are
generally accompanied by words such as estimate, project, predict, believe, expect,
anticipate, plan, goal or other words that convey the uncertainty of future events or
outcomes. In addition, sometimes we will specifically describe a statement as being a
forward-looking statement and refer to this cautionary statement.
In addition, various statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including those that
express a belief, expectation or intention, as well as those that are not statements of historical
fact, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date
of this report; we disclaim any obligation to update these statements unless required by securities
law, and we caution you not to rely on them unduly. We have based these forward-looking statements
on our current expectations and assumptions about future events. While our management considers
these expectations and assumptions to be reasonable, they are inherently subject to significant
business, economic, competitive, regulatory and other risks, contingencies and uncertainties, most
of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control. These risks,
contingencies and uncertainties relate to, among other matters, the following:
|
|
|
general economic and business conditions and industry trends; |
|
|
|
|
general developments in the industries in which we are involved; |
|
|
|
|
decisions about offshore developments to be made by oil and gas companies; |
|
|
|
|
decisions on spending by the U.S. Government and electric power generating companies; |
|
|
|
|
the highly competitive nature of most of our businesses; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of our suppliers to deliver raw materials in sufficient quantities and in a timely manner; |
16
|
|
|
our future financial performance, including compliance with covenants in our credit
agreements and other debt instruments and availability, terms and deployment of capital; |
|
|
|
|
the continued availability of qualified personnel; |
|
|
|
|
the operating risks normally incident to offshore construction operations and nuclear operations; |
|
|
|
|
changes in, or our failure or inability to comply with, government regulations and
adverse outcomes from legal and regulatory proceedings; |
|
|
|
|
changes in, and liabilities relating to, existing or future environmental regulatory matters; |
|
|
|
|
rapid technological changes; |
|
|
|
|
the realization of deferred tax assets, including through the reorganization we
completed in December 2006; |
|
|
|
|
the consequences of significant changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties we may encounter in obtaining regulatory or other necessary approvals of
any strategic transactions; |
|
|
|
|
social, political and economic situations in foreign countries where we do business,
including countries in the Middle East and Asia Pacific and the former Soviet Union; |
|
|
|
|
the possibilities of war, other armed conflicts or terrorist attacks; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of asserted and unasserted claims; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain surety bonds and letters of credit; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain builders risk, liability, property and other insurance in
amounts and on terms we consider adequate and at rates that we consider economical; |
|
|
|
|
the aggregated risks retained in our insurance captives; and |
|
|
|
|
the impact of the insurance coverage surrendered as part of the B&W Chapter 11 Settlement. |
We believe the items we have outlined above are important factors that could cause estimates
in our financial statements to differ materially from actual results and those expressed in a
forward-looking statement made in this report or elsewhere by us or on our behalf. We have
discussed many of these factors in more detail elsewhere in this report and in our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. These factors are not necessarily all the
important factors that could affect us. Unpredictable or unknown factors we have not discussed in
this report could also have material adverse effects on actual results of matters that are the
subject of our forward-looking statements. We do not intend to update our description of important
factors each time a potential important factor arises, except as required by applicable securities
laws and regulations. We advise our security holders that they should (1) be aware that important
factors not referred to above could affect the accuracy of our forward-looking statements and (2)
use caution and common sense when considering our forward-looking statements.
GENERAL
In general, our business segments are composed of capital-intensive businesses that rely on
large contracts for a substantial amount of their revenues. Each of our business segments is
financed on a stand-alone basis. Our debt covenants generally preclude using the financial
resources or the movement of excess cash from one segment for the benefit of the other. For
further discussion, see Liquidity and Capital Resources below.
As of March 31, 2007, in accordance with the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, we
have provided for our estimated costs to complete all our ongoing contracts. However, it is
possible that current estimates could change due to unforeseen events, which could result in
adjustments to overall contract costs. The risk on fixed-priced contracts is that revenue from the
customer does not rise to cover increases in our costs. It is possible that current estimates could
materially change for various reasons, including, but not limited to, changes in job conditions,
variations in labor and equipment productivity and increases in the cost of raw materials,
including various types of steel. Increases in costs on our fixed-price contracts could have a
material adverse impact on our
results of operations, financial condition and cash flow. Alternatively, reductions in overall
contract costs at completion could materially improve our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flow.
Offshore Oil and Gas Construction Segment
The revenues of our Offshore Oil and Gas Construction segment largely depend on the level of
oil and gas development activity in the worlds major hydrocarbon-producing regions. The
decision-making process for oil and gas companies in making capital expenditures on offshore oil
and gas construction for a development project differs depending on whether the project involves
new or existing development. In the case of new development projects, the demand for offshore oil
and gas construction generally follows the exploratory drilling and, in some cases, initial
development drilling activities. Based on the results of these activities and evaluations of field
economics, customers
17
determine whether to install new platforms and new infrastructure, such as
subsea gathering lines and pipelines. For existing development projects, demand for offshore oil
and gas construction is generated by decisions to, among other things, expand development in
existing fields and expand existing infrastructure.
Government Operations Segment
The revenues of our Government Operations segment primarily depend on spending by the U.S.
Government. As a supplier of major nuclear components for certain U.S. Government programs, BWXT
is a significant participant in the defense industry. Additionally, with BWXTs unique capability
of full life-cycle management of special nuclear materials, facilities and technologies, BWXT is
well-positioned to continue to participate in the continuing cleanup and management of the
Department of Energys nuclear sites and weapons complexes.
Power Generation Systems
The revenues of our Power Generation Systems segment are largely a function of capital
spending by electric power generating companies and other steam-using industries. B&W is a leading
supplier of fossil fuel-fired steam generating systems, large replacement commercial nuclear steam
generators, environmental equipment and components and related services to customers around the
world. It designs, engineers, manufactures, constructs and services large utility and industrial
power generation systems, including boilers used to generate steam in electric power plants, pulp
and paper making, chemical and process applications and other industrial uses.
For a summary of the critical accounting policies and estimates that we use in the preparation
of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, see Item 7 Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006. There have been no material changes to these policies during
the three months ended March 31, 2007, except as disclosed in the notes to condensed consolidated
financial statements included in this report.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 VS. THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2006
McDermott International, Inc. (Consolidated)
Our revenues increased approximately 111%, or $718.5 million, to $1,363.4 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2007, compared to $644.9 million for the three months ended March 31,
2006, primarily due to B&W being consolidated in our results of operations for approximately one
month in the three-month period ending March 31, 2006 compared to the full period in the three
months ended March 31, 2007. In addition, our Offshore Oil and Gas Construction segment produced an
86% increase in its revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2006. Our Middle East and Asia Pacific regions of our Offshore Oil and Gas
Construction segment in particular yielded revenue increases exceeding four times their March 31,
2006 levels. Our Government Operations segment revenues were up slightly in the three months ended
March 31, 2007 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Segment Operating Income, which is before equity in income of investees and gains (losses) on
asset disposals and impairments net, increased from $84.6 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2006 to $190.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2007. Our three operating
segments each improved substantially in the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2006, with our Offshore Oil and Gas Construction segment yielding segment
operating income in excess of three times its 2006 level. Our Government Operations segment
experienced an increase of approximately 34% in its segment operating income in the three months
ended March 31, 2007 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006. Results for our Power
Generation Systems segment include segment operating income for approximately one month
attributable to B&W in the three months ended March 31, 2006, compared to a full period for the
three months ending March 31, 2007.
Offshore Oil and Gas Construction
Revenues increased approximately 86%, or $254.8 million, to $550.3 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2007 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006, primarily due to an
increase in activities in our Middle East, Asia Pacific and Caspian regions.
Segment operating income, which is before equity in loss of investees and gains (losses) on
asset disposals and impairments net, increased $83.1 million from $38.9 million in the three
months ended March 31, 2006 to $122.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2007. This
increase was primarily attributable to our Middle East regions higher fabrication activities and
productivity improvements, along with cost savings in our marine projects. In addition, our Caspian
region improved due to contract change orders and agreements which were finalized as part
18
of our contract close-out process on projects. Also, our Asia Pacific region improved due to increased
fabrication activity, and our Americas region improved due to increased fabrication activity and
settlements on completed contracts. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, we realized benefits
from project close-outs, change orders and settlements totaling approximately $40 million, compared
to approximately $9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. These increases were
partially offset by higher general and administrative expenses in the three months ended March 31,
2007 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Gains (losses) on asset disposals and impairments net increased by $16.1 million in the
three months ended March 31, 2007, primarily attributable to an impairment of $16.4 million in the
three months ended March 31, 2006 associated with our former joint venture in Mexico.
Equity in loss of investees increased from $0.7 million in the three months ended March 31,
2006 to $0.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2007, primarily attributable to our share
of expenses in our deepwater solutions joint venture formed in 2005.
Government Operations
Revenues increased approximately 0.2%, or $0.4 million, to $161.4 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2007, compared to $161.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2006,
primarily due to higher volumes in the manufacture of nuclear components for certain U. S.
Government programs. In addition, we experienced higher revenues in our management and operating
contracts principally in South Carolina and New Mexico. These increases were partially offset by
lower revenues from the completion of our contract for the recovery of uranium, lower revenues
attributable to our commercial nuclear environmental services activities, and lower fees for
engineering services at certain DOE sites
Segment operating income, which is before equity in income of investees and gains on asset
disposals and impairments net, increased $6.8 million to $26.7 million in the three months ended March 31,
2007, compared to $19.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2006, primarily attributable to
higher volume and margins from our manufacture of nuclear components for certain U.S. Government
programs, including the completion of a multi-award agreement with our DOE customer. In addition,
we experienced additional fees for our management and operating contracts mainly in South Carolina
and New Mexico and lower pension plan expense in the three months ended March 31, 2007. These
increases were partially offset by lower volume and margins from our other U.S. Government recovery
efforts where our contract has terminated and the lower volume and margins on our nuclear
environmental commercial activities.
Gains on asset disposals and impairments net increased $1.6 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2007, primarily due to the sale of certain assets of our fuel cell and reformer
business.
Equity in income of investees remained unchanged at $6.5 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2007, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006. We experienced additional
fees from our joint venture in Texas, which were offset by lower fees from our joint venture in
Idaho.
Power Generation Systems
Revenues increased approximately 247%, or $466.4 million, to $655.4 for the three months ended
March 31, 2007, compared to $189.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, primarily due
to B&W being consolidated in our results of operations for approximately one month in the three-month period
ending March 31, 2006 compared to the full period in the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Segment operating income, which is before equity in income of investees and gains on asset
disposals and impairments net, increased approximately $16.2 million to $41.9 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to $25.7 million for the three months ended March
31, 2006. In addition to the increase attributable to B&W being consolidated in our results of
operations for approximately one month in the three-month period ending March 31, 2006 compared to
a full period in the three months ended March 31, 2007, the increase was partially attributable to
higher margins in operations and maintenance contracts, higher margin and volumes in replacement
parts and nuclear service activities, higher volume in utility steam system fabrication and the
fabrication, repair and retrofit of existing facilities. In addition, we experienced lower Chapter
11 reorganization expenses in the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2006. These increases were partially offset by lower margins in utility steam
system fabrication and the fabrication, repair, and retrofit of existing facilities.
19
Equity in income of investees decreased $0.2 million to $1.6 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2007, primarily attributable to a decrease in income recognized from our joint
venture in China, partially offset by an increase in income recognized from our joint venture in
Pennsylvania.
Corporate
Unallocated corporate expenses decreased approximately $1.4 million to $6.9 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to $8.4 million for the three months ended March 31,
2006, primarily due to a decrease in stock-based compensation expense.
Other Income Statement Items
Interest income increased $4.8 million to $12.3 million for the three months ended March 31,
2007, primarily due to an increase in average cash equivalents and investments.
Other expense net increased $2.3 million to $3.9 million for the three months ended March
31, 2007, primarily due to higher currency exchange losses in the current period.
Provision for Income Taxes
For the three months ended March 31, 2007, the provision for income taxes increased $12.9
million to $33.3 million, while income before provision for income taxes increased $114.7 million
to $191.3 million. Our effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was
approximately 17.4%.
We have provided for income taxes based on the tax laws and rates in the countries in which we
conduct our operations. MII is a Panamanian corporation that has earned all of its income outside
of Panama. As a result, we are not subject to income tax in Panama. We operate in the United
States taxing jurisdiction and various other taxing jurisdictions around the world. Each of these
jurisdictions has a regime of taxation that varies from the others. The taxation regimes vary not
only with respect to nominal rates, but also with respect to the allowability of deductions,
credits and other benefits and tax bases (for example, revenue versus income). These variances,
along with variances in our mix of income from these jurisdictions, contribute to shifts in our
effective tax rate.
As more fully described in Parts I and II of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006, the reorganization of the MI and JRMH U.S. tax groups into a single consolidated
U.S. tax group was completed on December 31, 2006. Beginning January 1, 2007, the results of the
former separate U.S. tax groups are consolidated through MHI, and a single U.S. tax return will be
filed.
Income before provision for income taxes, provision for income taxes and effective tax rates
for MII major subsidiaries are as shown below. To provide for a better comparison with the results
for the three-month period ended March 31, 2006, we continue to disclose the separate company
results of MI and JRMH, which, as indicated above, will be consolidated for tax purposes effective
January 1, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before |
|
Provision for |
|
Effective |
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes |
|
Income Taxes |
|
Tax Rate |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primarily United States: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MI |
|
$ |
49,287 |
|
|
$ |
59,541 |
|
|
$ |
20,044 |
|
|
$ |
12,624 |
|
|
|
40.67 |
% |
|
|
21.20 |
% |
JRMH |
|
|
(6,396 |
) |
|
|
(31,728 |
) |
|
|
(2,035 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
31.82 |
% |
|
|
(0.02 |
)% |
|
Subtotal (MHI for 2007) |
|
|
42,891 |
|
|
|
27,813 |
|
|
|
18,009 |
|
|
|
12,630 |
|
|
|
41.99 |
% |
|
|
45.41 |
% |
Non-United States: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Subsidiaries |
|
|
148,446 |
|
|
|
48,796 |
|
|
|
15,267 |
|
|
|
7,764 |
|
|
|
10.28 |
% |
|
|
15.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total MII |
|
$ |
191,337 |
|
|
$ |
76,609 |
|
|
$ |
33,276 |
|
|
$ |
20,394 |
|
|
|
17.39 |
% |
|
|
26.62 |
% |
|
We are subject to U.S. federal income tax at the rate of 35% on our U.S. operations. The
effective tax rate of our U.S. operations is primarily affected by applicable state income taxes on
our profitable U.S. subsidiaries.
In the three months ended March 31, 2006, MI reached a settlement in a tax dispute with United
States and Canadian tax authorities, primarily related to transfer pricing matters, resulting in an
adjustment to the tax liability
20
and associated accrued interest established for the disputed item.
This favorably impacted MIs income before income taxes and provision for income taxes by $13.2
million and $4.7 million, respectively. In addition, in the three months ended March 31, 2006, a
valuation allowance for the realization of deferred tax assets was provided against JRMHs current
losses in accordance with SFAS No. 109.
On April 12, 2007, MI received a $272 million federal income tax refund from the United States
Internal Revenue Service. This federal tax refund resulted from carrying back to prior tax years
the tax loss generated in 2006, primarily as a result of the $955 million of asbestos-related
payments made during 2006 in connection with the settlement of asbestos-related claims made in
B&Ws Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. A number of these prior tax years are currently open and,
therefore, certain adjustments may still occur before final settlement of these tax years.
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). As a result of this adoption, we
recognized a charge of approximately $12 million to our accumulated deficit component of
stockholders equity. Additionally, as of the adoption date, we had gross tax-effected
unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $70 million, of which approximately $68 million would
impact our effective tax rate if recognized.
As part of the adoption of FIN 48, we will begin to recognize interest and penalties related
to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. As of January 1, 2007, we have recorded a
liability of approximately $27 million for the payment of tax-related interest and penalties.
Backlog
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Offshore Oil and Gas Construction |
|
$ |
4,208,217 |
|
|
$ |
4,138,545 |
|
Government Operations |
|
|
1,456,593 |
|
|
|
1,269,328 |
|
Power Generation Systems |
|
|
2,260,520 |
|
|
|
2,225,149 |
|
|
|
Total Backlog |
|
$ |
7,925,330 |
|
|
$ |
7,633,022 |
|
|
Of the March 31, 2007 backlog, we expect to recognize revenues as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2007 |
|
Q3 2007 |
|
Q4 2007 |
|
2008 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(In approximate millions) |
Offshore Oil and Gas Construction |
|
$ |
600 |
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
$ |
760 |
|
|
$ |
1,770 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
Government Operations |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
Power Generation Systems |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Backlog |
|
$ |
1,080 |
|
|
$ |
1,160 |
|
|
$ |
1,190 |
|
|
$ |
2,850 |
|
|
$ |
1,650 |
|
|
At March 31, 2007, Government Operations backlog with the U. S. Government was $1.4 billion,
which is substantially fully funded. Only $15.1 million had not been funded as of March 31, 2007.
At March 31, 2007, Power Generation Systems backlog with the U. S. Government was $56.4
million, which was fully funded.
As disclosed in Parts I and II of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2006, B&W received notice from TXU Generation Development Company LLC (TXU) to suspend
activity on five of the eight supercritical coal-fired boilers and selective catalytic reduction
systems that were originally planned for TXUs solid-fuel power generation program in Texas. At
December 31, 2006, the value of all eight units was excluded from our consolidated backlog, as TXU
announced it did not intend to pursue any of these projects. In the three months ended March 31,
2007, B&W recognized revenues based on percentage-of-completion accounting for these eight units
totaling approximately $110 million.
On April 13, 2007, B&W and TXU entered into a termination and settlement agreement on the five
suspended units. Under this settlement agreement, B&W received a payment from TXU of approximately
$79 million in April 2007, which completes TXUs $243 million financial obligation to B&W related
to units four through eight, other
21
than ongoing storage and commission expenses. B&W will record
the termination and settlement in the three months ending June 30, 2007 and expects to record
additional revenues totaling approximately $120 million as a result of completion of the
settlement.
B&W is continuing to fulfill its contracts to supply the three units not covered by the
termination and settlement agreement, and TXU and B&W have agreed to cooperate in the marketing and
modification of these units, as may be necessary, to help meet expanding U.S. electrical power
demands. Consistent with our treatment at December 31, 2006, we have excluded the dollar value of
these three units from our consolidated ending backlog at March 31, 2007, as TXU still does not
intend to use these units and a new buyer has not yet contracted to purchase these units. We
believe if a new buyer does not emerge, TXU will likely terminate these units.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
JRM
On June 6, 2006, JRM entered into a $500 million senior secured credit facility with a
syndicate of lenders (the JRM Credit Facility). The JRM Credit Facility comprises a five-year,
$400 million revolving credit (all of which may be used for the issuance of letters of credit and
$250 million of which may be used for revolver borrowings), which matures on June 6, 2011, and a
six-year, $100 million synthetic letter of credit subfacility, which matures on June 6, 2012. The
proceeds of the JRM Credit Facility are available for working capital needs and other general
corporate purposes of JRM and its subsidiaries.
JRMs obligations under the JRM Credit Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by
substantially all of JRMs wholly owned subsidiaries and secured by liens on substantially all of
JRMs and these subsidiaries assets (other than cash, cash equivalents, equipment and certain
foreign assets), including their major marine vessels. JRM is permitted to prepay amounts
outstanding under the JRM Credit Facility at any time without penalty. Other than customary
mandatory prepayments on certain contingent events, the JRM Credit Facility requires only interest
payments on a quarterly basis until maturity. Loans outstanding under the revolving credit
subfacility bear interest at either the Eurodollar rate plus a margin ranging from 2.25% to 2.50%
per annum or the base rate plus a margin ranging from 1.25% to 1.50% per annum. The applicable
margin for revolving loans varies depending on JRMs credit ratings. JRM is charged a commitment
fee on the unused portions of the $400 million revolving credit subfacility, and that fee varies
between 0.375% and 0.50% per annum depending on JRMs credit ratings. Additionally, JRM is charged
a letter of credit fee of between 2.25% and 2.50% per annum with respect to the amount of each
letter of credit issued under the revolving credit subfacility. JRM is also charged a fee of 2.60%
per annum on the full amount of the synthetic letter of credit subfacility, regardless of whether
the subfacility is drawn upon. An additional 0.125% annual fee is charged on the amount of each
letter of credit issued under both subfacilities.
The JRM Credit Facility contains customary financial covenants relating to leverage and
interest coverage and includes covenants that restrict, among other things, debt incurrence, liens,
investments, acquisitions, asset dispositions, dividends, prepayments of subordinated debt,
mergers, transactions with affiliates and capital expenditures. JRM was in compliance with these
covenants at March 31, 2007.
At March 31, 2007, JRM had no borrowings outstanding, and letters of credit issued on the JRM
Credit Facility totaled $272.2 million. In addition, JRM had $130.8 million in outstanding
unsecured letters of credit under separate arrangements with financial institutions at March 31,
2007.
On December 22, 2005, JRM, as guarantor, and its subsidiary, J. Ray McDermott Middle East,
Inc., entered into a $105.2 million unsecured performance guarantee issuance facility with a
syndicate of commercial banking institutions. The outstanding amount under this facility is
included in the $130.8 million outstanding referenced above. This facility provides credit support
for bank guarantees issued in favor of three projects awarded to JRM. The term of this facility is
for the duration of these projects, and the average commission rate is less than 4.50% on an
annualized basis.
At March 31, 2007, JRM had approximately $28 million in accounts and notes receivable due from
its former joint venture in Mexico. This joint venture has experienced liquidity problems.
Recognition of a gain of approximately $5.4 million on the sale of the DB17 in September 2004 is currently being
deferred. JRM expects to collect all net accounts and notes receivable currently owed from this
joint venture.
22
Based on JRMs liquidity position, we believe JRM has sufficient cash and letter of credit and
borrowing capacity to fund its operating requirements for at least the next 12 months.
BWXT
On December 9, 2003, BWXT entered into a three-year, unsecured, $125 million credit facility
(the BWXT Credit Facility). The BWXT Credit Facility may be increased to a total of $150 million
at our discretion, and in fact, it was increased to $135 million in January 2004. In March 2005,
the maturity date was extended to March 18, 2010, and on November 7, 2005, BWXT and its lenders
amended the BWXT Credit Facility to, among other things, permit the full amount of the facility to
be used for loans.
The BWXT Credit Facility is a revolving credit agreement providing for borrowings and
issuances of letters of credit in an aggregate amount of up to $135 million. The BWXT Credit
Facility requires BWXT to comply with various financial and nonfinancial covenants and reporting
requirements. The financial covenants require BWXT to maintain a maximum leverage ratio, a minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio and a maximum debt to capitalization ratio. BWXT was in compliance
with these covenants at March 31, 2007. The interest rate at March 31, 2007 was 8.75%. BWXT is
charged an annual commitment fee of 0.375%, which is payable quarterly. Additionally, BWXT is
charged a letter of credit fee of between 1.50% and 2.50% per annum with respect to the amount of
each letter of credit issued. An additional 0.125% per annum fee is charged on the amount of each
letter of credit issued. At March 31, 2007, BWXT had no borrowings outstanding, and letters of
credit outstanding under the facility totaled $50.8 million.
Based on BWXTs liquidity position, we believe BWXT has sufficient cash and letter of credit
and borrowing capacity to fund its operating requirements for at least the next 12 months.
B&W
On February 22, 2006, B&W entered into a $650 million senior secured credit facility with a
syndicate of lenders (the B&W Facility). The B&W Facility includes a five-year, $200 million
revolving credit subfacility (the entire availability of which may be used for the issuance of
letters of credit or working capital requirements) and a six-year, $200 million letter of credit
subfacility.
The B&W Facility also originally included a commitment by certain of the lenders to loan B&W
up to $250 million in term debt to refinance the $250 million promissory note payable to a trust
under the B&W Chapter 11 plan of reorganization. On November 30, 2006, B&W drew down $250 million
on its term loan under the B&W Facility and completed its obligation to pay the $250 million
promissory note to the trust on December 1, 2006. On April 12, 2007, B&W retired the $250 million
term loan portion of its credit facility without penalty. This payment was made using cash on
hand, including B&Ws portion of the $272 million federal tax refund received by MI on April 12,
2007.
B&Ws obligations under the B&W Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by all of B&Ws
domestic subsidiaries and secured by liens on substantially all of B&Ws and these subsidiaries
assets, excluding cash and cash equivalents.
Loans outstanding under the revolving credit subfacility bear interest at either the
Eurodollar rate plus a margin ranging from 2.75% and 3.25% per annum or the base rate plus a margin
ranging from 1.75% to 2.25% per annum. The applicable margin for revolving loans varies depending
on B&Ws credit ratings. The applicable margin for the $250 million term loan, which was a
Eurodollar rate loan, was 3.0% per annum. The interest rate for the term loan at March 31, 2007
was 8.32%. B&W is charged a commitment fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit
subfacility, and that fee varies between 0.25% and 0.50% per annum depending on B&Ws credit
ratings. Additionally, B&W is charged a letter of credit fee of between 2.75% and 3.25% per annum
with respect to the amount of each letter of credit issued under the revolving credit subfacility.
B&W is also charged a fee of 2.85% per annum on the full amount of the synthetic letter of credit
subfacility, regardless of whether the subfacility is drawn upon. An additional 0.125% per annum
fee is charged on the amount of each letter of credit issued under each subfacility.
The B&W Facility only requires interest payments for the revolving credit subfacility and the
letter of credit subfacility on a quarterly basis until maturity, which is February 22, 2011 and
February 22, 2012, respectively. B&W may prepay amounts outstanding under the B&W Facility at any
time without penalty.
23
The B&W Facility contains customary financial covenants, including maintenance of a maximum
leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio, and covenants that, among other things,
restrict B&Ws ability to incur debt, create liens, make investments and acquisitions, sell assets,
pay dividends, prepay subordinated debt, merge with other entities, engage in transactions with
affiliates and make capital expenditures. The B&W Facility also contains customary events of
default. B&W was in compliance with these covenants at March 31, 2007.
As of March 31, 2007, B&W had outstanding borrowings of $250 million under its term loan
feature of the B&W Facility, and letters of credit issued on the B&W Facility totaled $244.3
million. As discussed above, the $250 million term loan was paid in full in April 2007.
Based on B&Ws liquidity position, we believe B&W has sufficient cash and letter of credit and
borrowing capacity to fund its operating requirements for at least the next 12 months.
OTHER
One of B&Ws Canadian subsidiaries has received notice of a possible warranty claim on one of
its projects on a contract executed in 1998. This project included a limited-term performance bond
totaling approximately $140 million, for which MII entered into an indemnity arrangement with the
surety underwriters. At this time, we are continuing to analyze the facts and circumstances
surrounding this issue. It is possible that B&Ws subsidiary may incur warranty costs in excess of
amounts provided for as of March 31, 2007. It is also possible that a claim could be initiated by
the B&W subsidiarys customer against the surety underwriter should certain events occur. If such
a claim were successful, the surety could seek to recover from B&Ws subsidiary the costs incurred
in satisfying the customer claim. If the surety should seek recovery from B&Ws subsidiary, we
believe that B&Ws subsidiary would have adequate liquidity to satisfy its obligations. However,
the ultimate resolution of this possible claim is uncertain, and an adverse outcome could have a
material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
We are currently exploring growth strategies across our segments through acquisitions to
expand and complement our existing businesses. As we pursue these opportunities, we expect they
would be funded by cash on hand, external financing or both.
On May 1, 2007, BWXT completed the previously announced acquisition of Marine Mechanical
Corporation (MMC) for approximately $75 million. MMC, headquartered in Euclid, Ohio, designs,
manufactures and supplies electro-mechanical equipment used by the United States Navy.
At March 31, 2007, we had restricted cash and cash equivalents totaling $114.6 million, of
which $1.1 million is required to meet reinsurance reserve requirements of our captive insurance
companies and $113.5 million is held in restricted foreign accounts.
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, our balance in cash and cash equivalents on our
consolidated balance sheets included approximately $15.8 million and $18.0 million, respectively,
in adjustments for bank overdrafts, with a corresponding increase in accounts payable for these
overdrafts.
Our working capital, excluding restricted cash and cash equivalents, increased by
approximately $386.1 million from negative $422.8 million at December 31, 2006 to negative $36.7
million at March 31, 2007, primarily attributable to the reclassification of approximately $274
million of income taxes receivable from noncurrent to current at March 31, 2007 and the increase in
accounts receivable discussed below.
Our net cash provided by operations was approximately $74.6 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007, compared to approximately $140.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
This decrease was primarily attributable to an increase in accounts receivable, which reflects an
increase in revenue generating activities.
Our net cash provided by investing activities decreased by approximately $64.4 million to $4.8
million for the three months ended March 31, 2007, compared to $69.2 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2006. This decrease was primarily attributable to the cash acquired from the
reconsolidation of B&W and its subsidiaries during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and an increase in restricted cash and cash equivalents,
partially offset by higher net maturities/sales of available-for-sale securities during the three
months ended March 31, 2007.
24
Our net cash provided by financing activities increased by approximately $0.9 million to $3.9
million in the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $3.0 million in the three months ended March
31, 2006, primarily attributable to an increase in excess tax benefits from stock options exercised
and restricted stock vested, partially offset by other financing activities.
At March 31, 2007, we had investments with a fair value of $239.8 million. Our investment
portfolio consists primarily of investments in government obligations and other highly liquid money
market instruments. As of March 31, 2007, we had pledged approximately $35.0 million fair value of
these investments to secure a letter of credit in connection with certain reinsurance agreements.
See Note 1 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this
report for information on new accounting standards.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our exposures to market risks have not changed materially from those disclosed in Item 7A
included in Part II of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, we carried out an evaluation,
under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
adopted by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)). Our
disclosure controls and procedures were developed through a process in which our management applied
its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures, which, by their
nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding the control objectives. You should note
that the design of any system of disclosure controls and procedures is based in part upon various
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and we cannot assure you that any design will
succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how
remote. Based on the evaluation referred to above, our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
are effective as of March 31, 2007 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, and such information is accumulated and communicated to
management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. There has been no change
in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2007 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
For information regarding ongoing investigations and litigation, see Note 6 to our unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements in Part I of this report, which we incorporate by
reference into this Item.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table provides information on our purchases of equity securities during the
quarter ended March 31, 2007, all of which involved repurchases of restricted shares of MII common
stock pursuant to the provisions of employee benefit plans that permit the repurchase of restricted
shares to satisfy statutory tax withholding obligations associated with the lapse of restrictions
applicable to those shares:
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of |
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares purchased |
|
number of shares |
|
|
Total number |
|
Average |
|
as part of |
|
that may yet be |
|
|
of shares |
|
price paid |
|
publicly announced |
|
purchased under the |
Period |
|
purchased |
|
per share |
|
plans or programs |
|
plans or program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2007
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
86,830 |
|
|
$ |
47.11 |
|
|
not applicable |
|
not applicable |
|
Total |
|
|
86,830 |
|
|
$ |
47.11 |
|
|
not applicable |
|
not applicable |
|
Item 5. Other Information
The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors administers the Executive Incentive
Compensation Plan (EICP), a cash bonus plan under which our executive officers participate. The
payment amount, if any, of an EICP award is determined based on: (1) the attainment of financial
performance measures (85% of the target award); (2) the
attainment of individual performance measures (15% of the target
award), and (3) the exercise
of the Compensation Committees discretionary authority. On February 27, 2007, our Compensation
Committee established 2007 target award opportunities and confidential financial performance goals
relative to those opportunities for our named executive officers, Messrs. Bruce W. Wilkinson,
Michael S. Taff, Francis S. Kalman, Robert A. Deason, John A. Fees and John T. Nesser III. Those
target opportunities and financial performance goals were reported on a Form 8-K dated March 2,
2007. On May 4, 2007, the Company established the following individual performance goals
relating to these named executive officers for the year ending December 31, 2007.
For Bruce W.
Wilkinson, our Chief Executive Officer, the individual measures of
the target EICP award include:
|
|
|
achieve specific levels of company-wide health, safety and environmental performance
averages; and |
|
|
|
|
positive assessment by the Board of Directors regarding six performance categories
selected by the Board of Directors including financial results,
strategic planning, communication and succession planning. |
For
Michael S. Taff, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, the individual
measures of the target EICP award include:
|
|
|
assess and alter as necessary the capital and organization structure of the Company and its subsidiaries to
support Company growth initiatives and facilitate measures to lower cost of capital; |
|
|
|
|
position and lead communication of the Companys results
to the investment community; and |
|
|
|
|
develop and implement specific strategies designed to increase financial discipline. |
For
Francis S. Kalman, our Executive Vice President, the individual
measure of the target EICP award was set as follows:
|
|
|
effect successful transition of the CFO function. |
For Robert A.
Deason, President and Chief Operating Officer of J. Ray McDermott, S.A., the
individual measures of the target EICP award include:
|
|
|
achieve specific levels of health, safety and environmental performance averages at our
Offshore Oil and Gas Construction segment; |
|
|
|
|
develop a long-term human resource management plan of our Offshore Oil and Gas Construction segment; and |
|
|
|
|
develop and implement diversified strategies for our Offshore Oil and Gas Construction
segment approved by our Chief Executive Officer and Board of Directors. |
For John A. Fees,
President and Chief Executive Officer of The Babcock & Wilcox Companies, the
individual measures of the target EICP award include:
|
|
|
achieve specific levels of health, safety and environmental performance averages at our
Power Generation Systems and Government Operations segment; and |
|
|
|
|
achieve specific level of synergies from the combination of
The Babcock & Wilcox Company and BWX Technologies, Inc.
under a common management structure. |
26
For John T. Nesser,
our Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative and Legal Officer, the
individual measures of the target EICP award include:
|
|
|
achieve specific levels of company-wide health, safety and environmental performance
averages; |
|
|
|
|
effect successful integration of Chief Information Officer
and Corporate Health Safety and Environmental functions; and |
|
|
|
|
develop enterprise risk management and business continuation program. |
From time to time, our directors, officers and employees may adopt trading plans pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1(c). Messrs. Bruce Wilkinson and John Fees each adopted a 10b5-1 trading
plan on March 6, 2007.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit 3.1* McDermott International, Inc.s Articles of Incorporation, as
amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to McDermott International, Inc.s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996 (File No. 1-08430)).
Exhibit 3.2* McDermott International, Inc.s Amended and Restated By-Laws
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to McDermott International, Inc.s Current Report
on Form 8-K dated May 3, 2006 (File No. 1-08430)).
Exhibit 3.3* Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Series D
Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to McDermott
International, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2001 (File No. 1-08430)).
Exhibit 4.1 Fourth Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2007,
by and between BWX Technologies, Inc., BWXT Services, Inc., BWXT Federal Services, Inc.,
the lenders referred to therein and Calyon New York Branch, as administrative agent.
Exhibit 10.1* Change-in-Control Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2007, by and between
McDermott International, Inc. and Michael S. Taff (incorporated by reference herein to
Exhibit 10.1 to McDermott International, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 26,
2007 (File No. 1-08430)).
Exhibit 10.2* McDermott International, Inc. Executive Compensation Incentive Plan 2007
target award opportunities and financial performance goals (incorporated by reference to
McDermott International, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 2, 2007 (File No.
1-08430)).
Exhibit 10.3* Form of 2001 LTIP Performance Shares Grant Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to McDermott International, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K
dated May 4, 2007 (File No. 1-08430)).
Exhibit 31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Chief Executive Officer.
Exhibit 31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Chief Financial Officer.
Exhibit 32.1 Section 1350 certification of Chief Executive Officer.
Exhibit 32.2 Section 1350 certification of Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference to the filing indicated. |
27
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael S. Taff |
|
|
By: |
Michael S. Taff |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer and Duly Authorized Representative) |
|
|
May 7, 2007
28
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1* |
|
McDermott
International, Inc.s Articles of Incorporation, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to McDermott International, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996 (File No. 1-08430)). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2* |
|
McDermott International, Inc.s Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to McDermott International, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 3, 2006 (File No. 1-08430)). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3* |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Series D Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 3.1 to McDermott International, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 (File No. 1-08430)). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Fourth Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2007, by and between BWX Technologies, Inc., BWXT Services, Inc., BWXT Federal Services, Inc., the lenders referred to therein and Calyon New York Branch, as administrative agent. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1* |
|
Change-in-Control Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2007, by and between McDermott International, Inc. and Michael S. Taff (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.1 to McDermott International, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 26, 2007 (File No. 1-08430)). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2* |
|
McDermott International, Inc. Executive Compensation Incentive Plan 2007 target award opportunities and financial performance goals (incorporated by reference to McDermott International, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 2, 2007 (File No. 1-08430)). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3* |
|
Form of 2001 LTIP Performance Shares Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to McDermott International, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 4, 2007 (File No. 1-08430)). |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Section 1350 certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Section 1350 certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference to the filing indicated. |