e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number
000-50869
METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
20-0836269 |
(State or other jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
8144 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 800 |
|
|
Dallas, Texas
|
|
75231-4388 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(214) 265-2550
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
On April 30, 2007, there were 346,643,726 shares of the registrants common stock, $0.0001 par
value, outstanding.
METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
Table of Contents
|
|
|
* |
|
No reportable information under this item. |
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share information)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
231,318 |
|
|
$ |
161,498 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
308,353 |
|
|
|
390,651 |
|
Restricted short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
607 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
106,721 |
|
|
|
92,915 |
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for uncollectible accounts of $2,228 and $1,950 at
March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively) |
|
|
25,531 |
|
|
|
28,140 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
40,203 |
|
|
|
33,109 |
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
27,953 |
|
|
|
26,509 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
26,844 |
|
|
|
24,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
767,738 |
|
|
|
758,527 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,363,786 |
|
|
|
1,256,162 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
2,072,885 |
|
|
|
2,072,885 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
9,369 |
|
|
|
9,187 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
58,434 |
|
|
|
54,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,272,212 |
|
|
$ |
4,153,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
364,742 |
|
|
$ |
325,681 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
105,631 |
|
|
|
90,501 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
3,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
490,293 |
|
|
|
435,629 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,576,000 |
|
|
|
2,580,000 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
199,106 |
|
|
|
177,197 |
|
Deferred rents |
|
|
24,243 |
|
|
|
22,203 |
|
Redeemable minority interest |
|
|
4,267 |
|
|
|
4,029 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
31,755 |
|
|
|
26,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
3,325,664 |
|
|
|
3,245,374 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (See Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SERIES D CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE REDEEMABLE PARTICIPATING PREFERRED STOCK, par value
$0.0001 per share, 4,000,000 shares designated, 3,500,993 shares issued and outstanding at
March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006; Liquidation preference of $452,567 and $447,388 at
March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
448,665 |
|
|
|
443,368 |
|
SERIES E CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE REDEEMABLE PARTICIPATING PREFERRED STOCK, par value
$0.0001 per share, 500,000 shares designated, 500,000 shares issued and outstanding at
March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006; Liquidation preference of $54,759 and $54,019 at
March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
51,960 |
|
|
|
51,135 |
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 4,000,000
of which have been designated as Series D Preferred Stock and 500,000 of which have
been designated as Series E Preferred Stock; no shares of preferred stock other than
Series D & E Preferred Stock (presented above) issued and outstanding at March 31, 2007
and
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 157,135,815
and 157,052,097 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
170,980 |
|
|
|
166,315 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
275,919 |
|
|
|
245,690 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(992 |
) |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
445,923 |
|
|
|
413,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
4,272,212 |
|
|
$ |
4,153,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
(in thousands, except share and per share information)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
439,516 |
|
|
$ |
275,416 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
97,170 |
|
|
|
54,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
536,686 |
|
|
|
329,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding depreciation and amortization expense of
$35,174 and $24,854, shown separately below) |
|
|
145,335 |
|
|
|
92,489 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
173,308 |
|
|
|
100,911 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation
and amortization expense of $4,206 and $2,406, shown separately below) |
|
|
72,937 |
|
|
|
51,437 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
39,380 |
|
|
|
27,260 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
10,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
434,010 |
|
|
|
282,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
102,676 |
|
|
|
46,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
48,976 |
|
|
|
20,884 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(7,157 |
) |
|
|
(4,572 |
) |
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
42,057 |
|
|
|
16,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
60,619 |
|
|
|
30,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(24,267 |
) |
|
|
(12,377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
36,352 |
|
|
|
18,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued dividends on Series D Preferred Stock |
|
|
(5,180 |
) |
|
|
(5,180 |
) |
Accrued dividends on Series E Preferred Stock |
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
(740 |
) |
Accretion on Series D Preferred Stock |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
Accretion on Series E Preferred Stock |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to Common Stock |
|
$ |
30,229 |
|
|
$ |
12,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
36,352 |
|
|
$ |
18,370 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on cash flow hedging derivative, net of tax |
|
|
(1,769 |
) |
|
|
611 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of tax |
|
|
(1,042 |
) |
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
34,136 |
|
|
$ |
18,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: (See Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
157,035,119 |
|
|
|
155,174,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
163,447,880 |
|
|
|
159,287,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
36,352 |
|
|
$ |
18,370 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
39,380 |
|
|
|
27,260 |
|
Provision for (recovery of) uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
2,039 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
1,796 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
10,365 |
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
(959 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
23,611 |
|
|
|
11,753 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
4,211 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
(13,976 |
) |
|
|
(11,032 |
) |
Accounts receivable |
|
|
2,482 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(5,431 |
) |
|
|
(3,646 |
) |
Deferred charges |
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
|
|
(7,626 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(5,417 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
8,119 |
|
|
|
2,682 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
15,141 |
|
|
|
12,066 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
111,572 |
|
|
|
65,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(156,235 |
) |
|
|
(134,740 |
) |
Change in prepaid purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(1,654 |
) |
|
|
(6,488 |
) |
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(321,322 |
) |
|
|
(270,893 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
404,551 |
|
|
|
276,692 |
|
Change in restricted cash and investments |
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
(3,116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(74,104 |
) |
|
|
(138,545 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in book overdraft |
|
|
38,281 |
|
|
|
23,611 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cost of raising capital |
|
|
(1,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,795 |
) |
Proceeds from minority interest in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
32,352 |
|
|
|
23,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
69,820 |
|
|
|
(48,950 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
161,498 |
|
|
|
112,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
231,318 |
|
|
$ |
63,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation:
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the
balances and results of operations of MetroPCS Communications, Inc. (MetroPCS) and its
consolidated subsidiaries (the Company). MetroPCS indirectly owns, through its wholly-owned
subsidiaries, 85% of the limited liability company member interest in Royal Street Communications,
LLC (Royal Street Communications). The consolidated financial statements include the balances and
results of operations of MetroPCS and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as well as the balances and
results of operations of Royal Street Communications and its wholly-owned subsidiaries
(collectively Royal Street). The Company consolidates its interest in Royal Street in accordance
with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46-R, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, because Royal Street is a variable interest entity and the Company
will absorb all of Royal Streets expected losses. All intercompany accounts and transactions
between the Company and Royal Street have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
The redeemable minority interest in Royal Street is included in long-term liabilities. The
condensed consolidated interim balance sheets as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the
condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and cash flows for the periods
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related footnotes are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein reflect all
adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary to state fairly the results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations
for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be
expected for any subsequent interim period or for the fiscal year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Federal Universal Service Fund (FUSF) and E-911 fees are assessed by various governmental
authorities in connection with the services that the Company provides to its customers. The
Company reports these fees on a gross basis in services revenues and cost of service on the
accompanying statements of income and comprehensive income. For the three months ended March 31,
2007 and 2006, the Company recorded approximately $19.9 million and $8.6 million, respectively, of
FUSF and E-911 fees. Sales, use and excise taxes are reported on a net basis in selling, general
and administrative fees on the accompanying statements of income and comprehensive income.
On March 14, 2007, the Companys board of directors approved a 3 for 1 stock split by means of
a stock dividend of two shares of common stock for each share of common stock issued and
outstanding at the close of business on March 14, 2007. Unless otherwise indicated, all share
numbers and per share prices included in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim
financial statements give effect to the stock split.
2. Share-Based Payments:
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment, (SFAS No. 123(R)), the Company has recognized stock-based compensation
expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments, which includes stock options
granted to employees. SFAS No. 1 23(R) replaces SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, (SFAS No. 123) and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related interpretations (APB No. 25). The
Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006. The Company records stock-based compensation
expense in cost of service and selling, general and administrative expenses. Stock-based
compensation expense recognized under SFAS No. 123(R) was $4.2 million and $1.8 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cost of service for the three months
ended March 31, 2007, includes $0.2 million of stock-based compensation. For
the three months ended March
4
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
31, 2007 and 2006, selling, general and administrative expenses include $4.0 million and $1.8
million of stock-based compensation, respectively.
3. Property and Equipment:
Property and equipment, net, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Construction-in-progress |
|
$ |
259,766 |
|
|
$ |
193,856 |
|
Network infrastructure |
|
|
1,405,183 |
|
|
|
1,329,986 |
|
Office equipment |
|
|
33,181 |
|
|
|
31,065 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
24,450 |
|
|
|
21,721 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
6,415 |
|
|
|
5,903 |
|
Vehicles |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,729,202 |
|
|
|
1,582,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(365,416 |
) |
|
|
(326,576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
1,363,786 |
|
|
$ |
1,256,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
84,288 |
|
|
$ |
90,084 |
|
Book overdraft |
|
|
59,569 |
|
|
|
21,288 |
|
Accrued accounts payable |
|
|
97,281 |
|
|
|
111,974 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
7,530 |
|
|
|
9,405 |
|
Payroll and employee benefits |
|
|
10,310 |
|
|
|
20,645 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
51,062 |
|
|
|
24,529 |
|
Taxes, other than income |
|
|
50,437 |
|
|
|
42,882 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
4,265 |
|
|
|
4,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
364,742 |
|
|
$ |
325,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Long-Term Debt:
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
91/4% Senior Notes |
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility |
|
|
1,592,000 |
|
|
|
1,596,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
2,592,000 |
|
|
|
2,596,000 |
|
Less: current maturities |
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
2,576,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,580,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1.0 Billion 91/4% Senior Notes
On November 3, 2006, MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. (Wireless) completed the sale of $1.0 billion
of 91/4% Senior Notes due 2014 (the 91/4% Senior Notes). The 91/4% Senior Notes are unsecured
obligations and are jointly and severally, fully and unconditionally guaranteed by MetroPCS, MetroPCS, Inc., and all of Wireless direct and
indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, but are not guaranteed by Royal Street. Interest is payable on
the 91/4% Senior Notes on May 1 and November 1 of each year,
beginning on May 1, 2007. Wireless may, at its option, redeem some or all of the 91/4% Senior
Notes at any time on or after November 1, 2010 for the redemption prices set forth in the indenture
governing the 91/4% Senior Notes. In addition, Wireless may also redeem up to 35% of the aggregate
principal amount of the 91/4% Senior Notes with the net cash proceeds of certain sales of equity
securities.
5
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
On November 3, 2006, Wireless also entered into a registration rights agreement. Under the
registration rights agreement, Wireless must file a registration statement with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) relating to an offer to exchange and issue notes equal
to the outstanding principal amount of the 91/4% Senior Notes prior to the earlier of (i) 365 days
after the closing date of the 91/4% Senior Notes and (ii) 30 days following the date that MetroPCS or
any of its subsidiaries, other than Royal Street, consummates a public offering of its capital
stock. In addition, Wireless must use all commercially reasonable efforts to cause such
registration statement to be declared effective by the SEC on or prior to 180 days after the filing
of the registration statement and consummate the exchange offer within 30 business days after the
registration statement has been declared effective by the SEC. If (i) Wireless fails to file a
registration statement by the applicable deadline, (ii) any such registration statement has not
been declared effective by the SEC by the applicable deadline, (iii) the exchange offer has not
been consummated by the applicable deadline or (iv) any registration statement required by the
registration rights agreement is filed and declared effective but thereafter ceases to be effective
or fails to be usable for its intended purpose without being cured under the terms of the
registration rights agreement, then Wireless and the guarantors of the 91/4% Senior Notes must pay
each holder liquidated damages in an amount equal to $0.05 per week per $1,000 in principal amount
of 91/4% Senior Notes for each week or portion thereof that the default continues for the first
90-day period immediately following the occurrence of the default. The amount of liquidated
damages increases by an additional $0.05 per week per $1,000 in principal amount of the 91/4% Senior
Notes with respect to each subsequent 90-day period until all defaults have been cured, up to a
maximum amount of liquidated damages of $0.20 per week per $1,000 in principal amount of 91/4% Senior
Notes. On April 24, 2007, MetroPCS closed on its initial public offering (the Offering)(See Note
15). Under the terms of the registration rights agreement, Wireless is required to file a
registration statement related to the exchange offer with the SEC by
May 24, 2007. On May 15, 2007, Wireless filed such required
initial registration
statement on Form S-4.
Senior Secured Credit Facility
On November 3, 2006, Wireless entered into a secured credit facility, pursuant to which
Wireless may borrow up to $1.7 billion, as amended, (the
Senior Secured Credit Facility). The
Senior Secured Credit Facility consists of a $1.6 billion term loan facility and a $100.0 million
revolving credit facility. The term loan facility is repayable in quarterly installments in annual
aggregate amounts equal to 1% of the initial aggregate principal amount of $1.6 billion. The term
loan facility will mature in seven years and the revolving credit facility will mature in five
years.
The facilities under the Senior Secured Credit Facility are guaranteed by MetroPCS, MetroPCS,
Inc. and each of Wireless direct and indirect present and future wholly-owned domestic
subsidiaries. The facilities are not guaranteed by Royal Street, but Wireless pledged the
promissory note that Royal Street had given it in connection with amounts borrowed by Royal Street
from Wireless and the limited liability company member interest held in Royal Street
Communications. The Senior Secured Credit Facility contains customary events of default, including
cross defaults. The obligations are also secured by the capital stock of Wireless as well as
substantially all of Wireless present and future assets and the
capital stock and substantially all of the assets of each of its direct and indirect
present and future wholly-owned subsidiaries (except as prohibited by law and certain permitted
exceptions), but excludes Royal Street.
The interest rate on the outstanding debt under the Senior Secured Credit Facility is
variable. The rate as of March 31, 2007 was 7.389%. On November 21, 2006, Wireless entered into a
three-year interest rate protection agreement to manage the Companys interest rate risk exposure
and fulfill a requirement of the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The agreement covers a notional
amount of $1.0 billion and effectively converts this portion of Wireless variable rate debt to
fixed rate debt. The quarterly interest settlement periods began on February 1, 2007. The interest
rate protection agreement expires on February 1, 2010. This financial instrument is included in
other long-term liabilities at fair market value, which was approximately $1.8 million as of March
31, 2007. At December 31, 2006, this financial instrument was reported in long-term investments at
fair market value, which was approximately $1.9 million. The change in fair value is reported in
accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in the consolidated balance sheets, net of income
taxes. On February 20, 2007, Wireless entered into an amendment
to the Senior Secured Credit Facility. Under the amendment, the margin used to determine the
Senior Secured Credit Facility interest rate was reduced to 2.25% from 2.50%.
6
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
As of March 31, 2007, there was a total of approximately $1.6 billion outstanding under the
Senior Secured Credit Facility, of which $16.0 million is reported in current maturities of
long-term debt and approximately $1.6 billion is reported as long-term debt on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
6. Income Taxes:
The Company records income taxes pursuant to SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
(SFAS No. 109). SFAS No. 109 uses an asset and liability approach to account for income taxes,
wherein deferred taxes are provided for book and tax basis differences for assets and liabilities.
In the event differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Companys
assets and liabilities result in deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance is provided for a
portion or all of the deferred tax assets when there is sufficient uncertainty regarding the
Companys ability to recognize the benefits of the assets in future years.
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income
taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 provides
guidance on the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected
to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures, and transition issues.
The Company has completed its review and assessment of uncertain tax
positions and the adoption of FIN 48 for the quarter ended
March 31, 2007 did not have a significant impact on the
Companys financial statements. There was no cumulative effect
adjustment related to adopting FIN 48. As of January 1, 2007, the amount of unrecognized tax
benefits was $23.4 million of which $22.6 million would, if recognized, decrease the Companys
effective tax rate.
The Company files income tax returns in the US federal and certain state jurisdictions and are
subject to examinations by the IRS and other taxing authorities. Federal examinations of income
tax returns filed by the Company and any of its subsidiaries for the years ending prior to January
1, 2004 are complete. The state of California is in the process of examining the Companys income
tax returns for the years 2002 through 2003 and the Company has entered the appeals process. At
this time, the Company cannot accurately predict when any issues raised in the California audit
will be fully resolved.
The Company classifies interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income
tax expense. As of January 1, 2007, current liabilities included
a total of $1.6 million and
non-current liabilities included a total of $8.8 million in accrued interest and penalties. The
amount of interest (after-tax) and penalties included in income tax expense for the quarter ended
March 31, 2007 totaled $0.6 million.
The Company does not expect that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the
positions included as of the date of the adoption will significantly increase or decrease within
the next twelve months.
7. Stockholders Equity:
Common Stock Issued to Directors
Non-employee members of MetroPCS Board of Directors receive compensation for serving on the
Board of Directors, as defined in MetroPCS Non-Employee Director Remuneration Plan. The annual
retainer provided under the Non-Employee Director Remuneration Plan may be paid, at the election of
each non-employee director, in cash, common stock, or a combination of cash and common stock.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, non-employee members of the Board of
Directors were issued 31,230 and 43,845 shares of common stock, respectively, as payment of their
annual retainer.
Stockholder Rights Plan
On March 27, 2007, in connection with the Offering, the Company adopted a Stockholder Rights
Plan (See Note
15). Under the Stockholder Rights Plan, each share of the Companys common stock includes one
right to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of series A junior participating preferred stock.
The rights will separate from the
7
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
common stock and become exercisable (1) ten calendar days after
public announcement that a person or group of affiliated or associated persons has acquired, or
obtained the right to acquire, beneficial ownership of 15% of the Companys outstanding common
stock or (2) ten business days following the start of a tender offer or exchange offer that would
result in a persons acquiring beneficial ownership of 15% of the Companys outstanding common
stock. A 15% beneficial owner is referred to as an acquiring person under the Stockholder Rights
Plan.
8. Net Income Per Common Share:
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common
share for the periods indicated (in thousands, except share and per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Basic EPSTwo Class Method: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
36,352 |
|
|
$ |
18,370 |
|
Accrued dividends and accretion: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series D Preferred Stock |
|
|
(5,298 |
) |
|
|
(5,298 |
) |
Series E Preferred Stock |
|
|
(825 |
) |
|
|
(825 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
30,229 |
|
|
$ |
12,247 |
|
Amount allocable to common shareholders |
|
|
57.2 |
% |
|
|
57.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights to undistributed earnings |
|
$ |
17,304 |
|
|
$ |
6,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic |
|
|
157,035,119 |
|
|
|
155,174,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common sharebasic |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights to undistributed earnings |
|
$ |
17,304 |
|
|
$ |
6,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingbasic |
|
|
157,035,119 |
|
|
|
155,174,314 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
526,947 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
6,412,761 |
|
|
|
3,586,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstandingdiluted |
|
|
163,447,880 |
|
|
|
159,287,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common sharediluted |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share is computed in accordance with EITF
03-6,Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128 (EITF
03-6). Under EITF 03-6, the preferred stock is considered a participating security for purposes
of computing earnings or loss per common share and, therefore, the preferred stock is included in
the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share using the two-class method,
except during periods of net losses. When determining basic earnings per common share under EITF
03-6, undistributed earnings for a period are allocated to a participating security based on the
contractual participation rights of the security to share in those earnings as if all of the
earnings for the period had been distributed.
For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, 142.8 million and 136.1 million,
respectively, of convertible shares of Series D Preferred Stock were excluded from the calculation
of diluted net income per common share since the effect was anti-dilutive.
For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, 6.0 million and 5.7 million, respectively,
of convertible shares of Series E Preferred Stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted net
income per common share since the effect was anti-dilutive.
See
Note 15 for a discussion of the Offering and the related
conversion of all outstanding preferred stock in April 2007.
9. Commitments and Contingencies:
The Company has entered into pricing agreements with various handset manufacturers for the
purchase of wireless handsets at specified prices. The terms of these agreements expire on various
dates during the year ending December 31, 2007. In addition, the Company entered into an agreement
with a handset manufacturer for the purchase of 475,000 handsets at a specified price by September
30, 2007.
8
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Rescission Offer
Certain options granted under the Companys 1995 Stock Option Plan and 2004 Equity Incentive
Plan may not have been exempt from registration or qualification under federal securities laws and
the securities laws of certain states. As a result, on April 27, 2007, the Companys Board of
Directors approved a rescission offer to the holders of certain
options and on May 15, 2007 the Company filed an initial registration statement on Form S-1. If this rescission offer
is accepted, the Company could be required to make aggregate payments to the holders of these
options of up to approximately $1.4 million, which includes statutory interest, based on options
outstanding as of March 31, 2007. This rescission offer
may not terminate a purchasers right to rescind a sale of a security that was not registered as
required. If any or all of the offerees reject the rescission offer, the Company may continue to be
liable for this amount under federal and state securities laws. Management does not believe that
this rescission offer will have a material effect on the Companys results of operations, cash
flows or financial position.
AWS Licenses Acquired in Auction 66
Spectrum allocated for advanced wireless services (AWS) currently is utilized by a variety
of categories of commercial and governmental users. To foster the orderly clearing of the spectrum,
the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted a transition and cost sharing plan pursuant
to which incumbent non-governmental users could be reimbursed for relocating out of the band and
the costs of relocation would be shared by AWS licensees benefiting from the relocation. The FCC
has established a plan where the AWS licensee and the incumbent non-governmental user are to
negotiate voluntarily for three years and then, if no agreement has been reached, the incumbent
licensee is subject to mandatory relocation where the AWS licensee can force the incumbent
non-governmental licensee to relocate at the AWS licensees expense. The spectrum allocated for AWS
currently is utilized also by governmental users. The FCC rules provide that a portion of the money
raised in Auction 66 will be used to reimburse the relocation costs of governmental users from the
AWS band. However, not all governmental users are obligated to
relocate and some such users may delay relocation for some time. For the three months ended
March 31, 2007, the Company incurred approximately
$0.2 million in microwave relocation costs. No relocation costs
were incurred for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Litigation
The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of
business. The ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse
impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions in relation to claims of patent
infringement. The ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse
impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
10. Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
22,069 |
|
|
$ |
16,141 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
Non-cash investing activities:
Net changes in the Companys accrued purchases of property, plant and equipment were $7.0
million and $32.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
9
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Non-cash financing activities:
MetroPCS accrued dividends of $5.2 million and $5.2 million related to the Series D Preferred
Stock for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
MetroPCS accrued dividends of $0.7 million and $0.7 million related to the Series E Preferred
Stock for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
11. Related-Party Transactions:
One of the Companys current directors is a general partner of various investment funds
affiliated with one of the Companys greater than 5% stockholders. These funds own in the aggregate
an approximate 17% interest in a company that provides services to the Companys customers,
including handset insurance programs and roadside assistance services. Pursuant to the Companys
agreement with this related party, the Company bills its customers directly for these services and
remits the fees collected from its customers for these services to the related party. During the
three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company received fees of approximately $1.1 million
and $0.5 million, respectively, as compensation for providing this billing and collection service.
In addition, the Company also sells handsets to this related party. For the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company sold approximately $3.2 million and $3.2 million in handsets,
respectively, to the related party. As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company owed
approximately $3.7 million and $3.0 million, respectively, to this related party for fees collected
from its customers that are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. As of March 31, 2007 receivables from this related party in the amount
of approximately $1.2 million are included in accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2006,
receivables from this related party in the amount of approximately $0.8 million and $0.1 million,
respectively, are included in accounts receivable and other current assets, respectively.
12. Segment Information:
Operating segments are defined by SFAS No. 131, Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise
and Related Information, (SFAS No. 131), as components of an enterprise about which separate
financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision
maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Companys chief
operating decision maker is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.
As of March 31, 2007, the Company had eight operating segments based on geographic region
within the United States: Atlanta, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Miami, San Francisco, Sacramento,
Tampa/Sarasota/Orlando and Los Angeles. Each of these operating segments provides wireless voice
and data services and products to customers in its service areas or is currently constructing a
network in order to provide these services. These services include unlimited local and long
distance calling, voicemail, caller ID, call waiting, text messaging, picture and multimedia
messaging, international long distance and text messaging, ringtones, games and content
applications, unlimited directory assistance, ring back tones, nationwide roaming, mobile Internet
browsing, push e-mail and other value-added services.
The Company aggregates its operating segments into two reportable segments: Core Markets and
Expansion Markets.
|
|
|
Core Markets, which include Atlanta, Miami, San Francisco, and Sacramento, are
aggregated because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating
decision maker, they are similar in respect to their products and services, production
processes, class of customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and
currently exhibit similar financial performance and economic characteristics. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets, which include Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit,
Tampa/Sarasota/Orlando and Los Angeles, are aggregated because they are reviewed on an
aggregate basis by the chief operating decision maker, they are similar in respect to
their products and services, production processes, class of customer, method of
distribution, and regulatory environment and have similar expected long-term financial
performance and economic characteristics. |
10
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
General corporate overhead, which includes expenses such as corporate employee labor costs,
rent and utilities,
legal, accounting and auditing expenses, is allocated equally across all operating segments.
Corporate marketing and advertising expenses are allocated equally to the operating segments,
beginning in the period during which the Company launches service in that operating segment.
Expenses associated with the Companys national data center are allocated based on the average
number of customers in each operating segment. There are no transactions between reportable
segments.
Interest expense, interest income, gain/loss on extinguishment of debt and income taxes are
not allocated to the segments in the computation of segment operating results for internal
evaluation purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expansion |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
|
Core Markets |
|
Markets |
|
Other (4) |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
336,934 |
|
|
$ |
102,582 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
439,516 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
68,268 |
|
|
|
28,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,170 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
405,202 |
|
|
|
131,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536,686 |
|
Cost of service (1) |
|
|
100,440 |
|
|
|
44,707 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
145,335 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
113,240 |
|
|
|
60,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,308 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (2) |
|
|
43,296 |
|
|
|
28,838 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
72,937 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA (deficit) (3) |
|
|
150,322 |
|
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(884 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
28,105 |
|
|
|
10,063 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
39,380 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
2,095 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
4,211 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
117,225 |
|
|
|
(12,186 |
) |
|
|
(2,363 |
) |
|
|
102,676 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,976 |
|
|
|
48,976 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,157 |
) |
|
|
(7,157 |
) |
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
117,225 |
|
|
|
(12,186 |
) |
|
|
(44,420 |
) |
|
|
60,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expansion |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 |
|
Core Markets |
|
Markets |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
264,597 |
|
|
$ |
10,819 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
275,416 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
50,047 |
|
|
|
3,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,045 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
314,644 |
|
|
|
14,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329,461 |
|
Cost of service |
|
|
78,932 |
|
|
|
13,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,489 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
90,928 |
|
|
|
9,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,911 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (2) |
|
|
37,475 |
|
|
|
13,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,437 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA (deficit) (3) |
|
|
109,120 |
|
|
|
(22,685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
25,007 |
|
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
27,260 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
72,055 |
|
|
|
(24,350 |
) |
|
|
(706 |
) |
|
|
46,999 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,884 |
|
|
|
20,884 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,572 |
) |
|
|
(4,572 |
) |
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
72,055 |
|
|
|
(24,350 |
) |
|
|
(16,958 |
) |
|
|
30,747 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cost of service for the three months ended March 31, 2007, includes $0.2 million of
stock-based compensation disclosed separately. |
|
(2) |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses include stock-based compensation disclosed
separately. For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, selling, general and
administrative expenses include $4.0 million and $1.8 million of stock-based compensation,
respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Core and Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA (deficit) is presented in accordance with SFAS No.
131 as it is the primary financial measure utilized by management to facilitate evaluation of
the Companys ability to meet future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital
requirements and to fund future growth. |
|
(4) |
|
Other includes expenses associated with the AWS
licenses the Company was granted in November 2006 as a result of FCC
Auction 66. These expenses
are presented in the Other column as utilization of the Auction 66 AWS licenses in the
Companys operations has not commenced and the Company has not allocated the Auction 66 AWS
licenses to a reportable segment as of March 31, 2007. |
11
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
The following table reconciles segment Adjusted EBITDA (deficit) for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 to consolidated income before provision for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Segment Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
150,322 |
|
|
$ |
109,120 |
|
Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(22,685 |
) |
Other Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit) |
|
|
(884 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
149,317 |
|
|
|
86,435 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(39,380 |
) |
|
|
(27,260 |
) |
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
(3,050 |
) |
|
|
(10,365 |
) |
Non-cash compensation expense |
|
|
(4,211 |
) |
|
|
(1,811 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(48,976 |
) |
|
|
(20,885 |
) |
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
(157 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
|
7,157 |
|
|
|
4,572 |
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income before provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
60,619 |
|
|
$ |
30,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Guarantor Subsidiaries:
In connection with Wireless sale of the 91/4% Senior Notes and the entry into the Senior
Secured Credit Facility, MetroPCS and all of MetroPCS subsidiaries, other than Wireless and Royal
Street (the guarantor subsidiaries), provided guarantees on the 91/4% Senior Notes and Senior
Secured Credit Facility. These guarantees are full and unconditional as well as joint and several.
Certain provisions of the Senior Secured Credit Facility restrict the ability of the guarantor
subsidiaries to transfer funds to Wireless. Royal Street Communications and its subsidiaries (the
non-guarantor subsidiaries) are not guarantors of the 91/4% Senior Notes or the Senior Secured
Credit Facility.
The following information presents condensed consolidating balance sheets as of March 31, 2007
and December 31, 2006, condensed consolidating statements of income for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006, and condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 of the parent company (MetroPCS), the issuer (Wireless), the
guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries. Investments include investments in
subsidiaries held by the parent company and the issuer and have been presented using the equity
method of accounting.
12
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
29,626 |
|
|
$ |
124,436 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
76,992 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
231,318 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
32,861 |
|
|
|
275,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,353 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,660 |
|
|
|
8,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,721 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
(1,480 |
) |
|
|
25,531 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,739 |
|
|
|
34,539 |
|
|
|
1,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,203 |
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,953 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
815 |
|
Current receivable from subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,058 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
11,006 |
|
|
|
15,969 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
26,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
62,758 |
|
|
|
571,369 |
|
|
|
58,833 |
|
|
|
80,757 |
|
|
|
(5,979 |
) |
|
|
767,738 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,489 |
|
|
|
1,215,506 |
|
|
|
117,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,363,786 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
354,283 |
|
|
|
1,033,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,387,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
1,391,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387,876 |
|
|
|
293,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,072,885 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,369 |
|
Long-term receivable from subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
538,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(538,204 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
56,318 |
|
|
|
4,469 |
|
|
|
8,395 |
|
|
|
(12,569 |
) |
|
|
58,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,810,272 |
|
|
$ |
2,229,894 |
|
|
$ |
1,676,053 |
|
|
$ |
500,542 |
|
|
$ |
(1,944,549 |
) |
|
$ |
4,272,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
543 |
|
|
$ |
188,210 |
|
|
$ |
150,186 |
|
|
$ |
31,562 |
|
|
$ |
(5,759 |
) |
|
$ |
364,742 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,058 |
|
|
|
(4,058 |
) |
|
|
16,000 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,410 |
|
|
|
86,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,631 |
|
Advances to subsidiaries |
|
|
863,181 |
|
|
|
(1,149,521 |
) |
|
|
286,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
3,879 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
(1,150 |
) |
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
863,724 |
|
|
|
(925,860 |
) |
|
|
526,626 |
|
|
|
36,770 |
|
|
|
(10,967 |
) |
|
|
490,293 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,576,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,581 |
|
|
|
(7,581 |
) |
|
|
2,576,000 |
|
Long-term note to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538,204 |
|
|
|
(538,204 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
199,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199,106 |
|
Deferred rents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,543 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,243 |
|
Redeemable minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,267 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,098 |
|
|
|
7,531 |
|
|
|
2,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
863,724 |
|
|
|
1,875,611 |
|
|
|
557,700 |
|
|
|
585,381 |
|
|
|
(556,752 |
) |
|
|
3,325,664 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (See
Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SERIES D PREFERRED STOCK |
|
|
448,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
448,665 |
|
SERIES E PREFERRED STOCK |
|
|
51,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,960 |
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
170,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,980 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
275,919 |
|
|
|
355,343 |
|
|
|
1,118,353 |
|
|
|
(104,839 |
) |
|
|
(1,368,857 |
) |
|
|
275,919 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(992 |
) |
|
|
(1,060 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
(992 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
445,923 |
|
|
|
354,283 |
|
|
|
1,118,353 |
|
|
|
(84,839 |
) |
|
|
(1,387,797 |
) |
|
|
445,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
|
$ |
1,810,272 |
|
|
$ |
2,229,894 |
|
|
$ |
1,676,053 |
|
|
$ |
500,542 |
|
|
$ |
(1,944,549 |
) |
|
$ |
4,272,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
15,714 |
|
|
$ |
99,301 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
46,226 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
161,498 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
45,365 |
|
|
|
345,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,651 |
|
Restricted short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
607 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,339 |
|
|
|
11,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,915 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
(2,213 |
) |
|
|
28,140 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,107 |
|
|
|
23,865 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,109 |
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,509 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
815 |
|
Current receivable from subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,734 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
9,478 |
|
|
|
15,354 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
24,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
61,176 |
|
|
|
605,473 |
|
|
|
51,052 |
|
|
|
48,539 |
|
|
|
(7,713 |
) |
|
|
758,527 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,077 |
|
|
|
1,158,442 |
|
|
|
83,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,256,162 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
320,783 |
|
|
|
939,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,259,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
FCC licenses |
|
|
1,391,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387,876 |
|
|
|
293,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,072,885 |
|
Microwave relocation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,187 |
|
Long-term receivable from subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
456,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(456,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
51,477 |
|
|
|
4,078 |
|
|
|
5,810 |
|
|
|
(7,268 |
) |
|
|
54,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,773,768 |
|
|
$ |
2,067,971 |
|
|
$ |
1,610,635 |
|
|
$ |
431,591 |
|
|
$ |
(1,730,843 |
) |
|
$ |
4,153,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
401 |
|
|
$ |
138,953 |
|
|
$ |
161,663 |
|
|
$ |
29,614 |
|
|
$ |
(4,950 |
) |
|
$ |
325,681 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,734 |
|
|
|
(4,734 |
) |
|
|
16,000 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,030 |
|
|
|
71,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,501 |
|
Advances to subsidiaries |
|
|
865,612 |
|
|
|
(1,207,821 |
) |
|
|
341,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
3,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
866,013 |
|
|
|
(1,033,807 |
) |
|
|
578,500 |
|
|
|
35,105 |
|
|
|
(10,182 |
) |
|
|
435,629 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,580,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,540 |
|
|
|
(4,540 |
) |
|
|
2,580,000 |
|
Long-term note to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
456,070 |
|
|
|
(456,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
177,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,197 |
|
Deferred rents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,784 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,203 |
|
Redeemable minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,029 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,517 |
|
|
|
6,285 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
866,020 |
|
|
|
1,746,929 |
|
|
|
606,569 |
|
|
|
496,648 |
|
|
|
(470,792 |
) |
|
|
3,245,374 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (See Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SERIES D PREFERRED STOCK |
|
|
443,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
443,368 |
|
SERIES E PREFERRED STOCK |
|
|
51,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,135 |
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
166,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
166,315 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
245,690 |
|
|
|
319,863 |
|
|
|
1,004,066 |
|
|
|
(85,057 |
) |
|
|
(1,238,872 |
) |
|
|
245,690 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,179 |
) |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
413,245 |
|
|
|
321,042 |
|
|
|
1,004,066 |
|
|
|
(65,057 |
) |
|
|
(1,260,051 |
) |
|
|
413,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,773,768 |
|
|
$ |
2,067,971 |
|
|
$ |
1,610,635 |
|
|
$ |
431,591 |
|
|
$ |
(1,730,843 |
) |
|
$ |
4,153,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Income
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
$ |
439,488 |
|
|
$ |
4,225 |
|
|
$ |
(4,774 |
) |
|
$ |
439,516 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,080 |
|
|
|
94,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,657 |
|
|
|
533,578 |
|
|
|
4,225 |
|
|
|
(4,774 |
) |
|
|
536,686 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization expense
shown separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,411 |
|
|
|
9,698 |
|
|
|
(4,774 |
) |
|
|
145,335 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,984 |
|
|
|
170,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,308 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (excluding depreciation and
amortization expense shown separately
below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
68,331 |
|
|
|
4,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,937 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,708 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,380 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,081 |
|
|
|
420,823 |
|
|
|
14,880 |
|
|
|
(4,774 |
) |
|
|
434,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
112,755 |
|
|
|
(10,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,676 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,312 |
|
|
|
(1,522 |
) |
|
|
9,730 |
|
|
|
(13,544 |
) |
|
|
48,976 |
|
Earnings from consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(35,481 |
) |
|
|
(94,505 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of put option in
majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(871 |
) |
|
|
(19,216 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(604 |
) |
|
|
13,544 |
|
|
|
(7,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(36,352 |
) |
|
|
(59,171 |
) |
|
|
(1,532 |
) |
|
|
9,126 |
|
|
|
129,986 |
|
|
|
42,057 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for
income taxes |
|
|
36,352 |
|
|
|
59,747 |
|
|
|
114,287 |
|
|
|
(19,781 |
) |
|
|
(129,986 |
) |
|
|
60,619 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
36,352 |
|
|
$ |
35,480 |
|
|
$ |
114,287 |
|
|
$ |
(19,781 |
) |
|
$ |
(129,986 |
) |
|
$ |
36,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Income
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
275,416 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
275,416 |
|
Equipment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
50,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
326,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329,461 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding
depreciation and amortization expense
shown separately below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,959 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,489 |
|
Cost of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,093 |
|
|
|
97,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,911 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (excluding depreciation and
amortization expense shown separately
below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
48,020 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,437 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,260 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
275,422 |
|
|
|
3,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,851 |
|
|
|
(3,852 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,999 |
|
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,350 |
|
|
|
(1,424 |
) |
|
|
8,775 |
|
|
|
(8,817 |
) |
|
|
20,884 |
|
Earnings from consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(17,828 |
) |
|
|
(40,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of put option in
majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
(12,712 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
8,817 |
|
|
|
(4,572 |
) |
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(18,370 |
) |
|
|
(30,205 |
) |
|
|
(1,642 |
) |
|
|
8,641 |
|
|
|
57,828 |
|
|
|
16,252 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for
income taxes |
|
|
18,370 |
|
|
|
30,205 |
|
|
|
52,493 |
|
|
|
(12,493 |
) |
|
|
(57,828 |
) |
|
|
30,747 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
18,370 |
|
|
$ |
17,828 |
|
|
$ |
52,493 |
|
|
$ |
(12,493 |
) |
|
$ |
(57,828 |
) |
|
$ |
18,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
36,352 |
|
|
$ |
35,480 |
|
|
$ |
114,287 |
|
|
$ |
(19,781 |
) |
|
$ |
(129,986 |
) |
|
$ |
36,352 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
(loss) to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,708 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,380 |
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,758 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,039 |
|
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,796 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,826 |
|
|
|
(13,826 |
) |
|
|
1,096 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(959 |
) |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned
subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,611 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,211 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
(33,751 |
) |
|
|
(133,187 |
) |
|
|
(37,592 |
) |
|
|
(6,379 |
) |
|
|
211,258 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
|
(73,268 |
) |
|
|
125,007 |
|
|
|
(9,888 |
) |
|
|
67,446 |
|
|
|
111,572 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,418 |
) |
|
|
(119,025 |
) |
|
|
(26,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(156,235 |
) |
Change in prepaid purchases of property and
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,321 |
|
|
|
(5,975 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,654 |
) |
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(54,727 |
) |
|
|
(266,595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(321,322 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
67,553 |
|
|
|
336,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,551 |
|
Change in restricted cash and investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
|
12,826 |
|
|
|
64,862 |
|
|
|
(125,000 |
) |
|
|
(26,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,104 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in book overdraft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,281 |
|
Proceeds from long-term note to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
(70,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
Cost of raising capital |
|
|
(1,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,288 |
) |
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,367 |
) |
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing
activities |
|
|
(1,189 |
) |
|
|
33,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,446 |
|
|
|
(67,446 |
) |
|
|
32,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
13,912 |
|
|
|
25,135 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
30,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,820 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
15,714 |
|
|
|
99,301 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
46,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
29,626 |
|
|
$ |
124,436 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
76,992 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
231,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
18,370 |
|
|
$ |
17,828 |
|
|
$ |
52,493 |
|
|
$ |
(12,493 |
) |
|
$ |
(57,828 |
) |
|
$ |
18,370 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
(loss) to net cash (used in) provided
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,260 |
|
Recovery of uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
8,817 |
|
|
|
(8,817 |
) |
|
|
379 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,365 |
|
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned
subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,753 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
(17,867 |
) |
|
|
(114,183 |
) |
|
|
45,392 |
|
|
|
14,422 |
|
|
|
66,645 |
|
|
|
(5,591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
(84,806 |
) |
|
|
139,355 |
|
|
|
10,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,628 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131,068 |
) |
|
|
(3,672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134,740 |
) |
Change in prepaid purchases of property and
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,488 |
) |
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(82,454 |
) |
|
|
(188,439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(270,893 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
76,450 |
|
|
|
200,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276,692 |
|
Change in restricted cash and investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,122 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(6,004 |
) |
|
|
8,681 |
|
|
|
(137,550 |
) |
|
|
(3,672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138,545 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in book overdraft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,611 |
|
Proceeds from minority interest in subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
Repayment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,795 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,795 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing
activities |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
25,611 |
|
|
|
(1,795 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(5,520 |
) |
|
|
(50,514 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,950 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of
period |
|
|
10,624 |
|
|
|
95,772 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
6,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
5,104 |
|
|
$ |
45,258 |
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
13,168 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
63,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
14. Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (SFAS No. 157),
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands
disclosure about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company will be required
to adopt SFAS No. 157 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008. The Company has not completed its
evaluation of the effect of SFAS No. 157.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, (SFAS No. 159),
which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at
fair value. The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing entities
with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets
and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting
provisions. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
Company will be required to adopt SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008. The Company has not completed
its evaluation of the effect of SFAS No. 159.
15. Subsequent Events:
Initial Public Offering
On April 24, 2007, the Company consummated the Offering of 57,500,000 shares of common stock
priced at $23.00 per share (less underwriting discounts and
commissions). The Company offered 37,500,000 shares of common stock and certain of
the Companys existing stockholders offered 20,000,000 shares of
common stock in the Offering, which included 7,500,000 shares
sold by the Companys existing stockholders pursuant to the underwriters exercise of their over-allotment
option. Concurrent with the Offering, all outstanding shares of
preferred stock, including accrued but unpaid dividends, were
converted into 150,962,690 shares of common stock. The
shares began trading on April 19, 2007 on The New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PCS.
Stock Option Grants
On
April 18, 2007, the Company granted stock options to purchase an
aggregate of 5,480,148 shares
of the Companys common stock to certain employees. The exercise price for the option grants is
$23.00, which is the price of the Companys common stock on the date of the Offering. The stock
options granted will generally vest on a four-year vesting schedule with 25% vesting on the first
anniversary date of the award and the remainder pro-rata on a monthly basis thereafter.
Purchase
Agreement
In
May 2007, the Company entered into an agreement to use commercially
reasonable efforts to deploy 1,001 nodes in distributed antenna
systems pursuant to a 15 year lease at a specified price.
19
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
Any statements made in this report that are not statements of historical fact, including
statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995, as amended, and should be evaluated as such.
Forward-looking statements include information concerning possible or assumed future results of
operations, including statements that may relate to our plans, objectives, strategies, goals,
future events, future revenues or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs and other
information that is not historical information. These forward-looking statements often include
words such as anticipate, expect, suggests, plan, believe, intend, estimates,
targets, projects, should, may, will, forecast, and other similar expressions. These
forward-looking statements are contained throughout this report, including Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
We base these forward-looking statements or projections on our current expectations, plans and
assumptions that we have made in light of our experience in the industry, as well as our
perceptions of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other
factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances. As you read and consider this report,
you should understand that these forward-looking statements or projections are not guarantees of
future performance or results. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements and
projections are based on reasonable assumptions at the time they are made, you should be aware that
many factors could affect our actual financial results, performance or results of operations and
could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking
statements and projections. Factors that may materially affect such forward-looking statements and
projections include:
|
|
|
the highly competitive nature of our industry; |
|
|
|
|
the rapid technological changes in our industry; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain adequate customer care and manage our churn rate; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to sustain the growth rates we have experienced to date; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to access the funds necessary to build and operate our Auction 66 Markets; |
|
|
|
|
the costs associated with being a public company and our ability to comply with
the internal financial and disclosure controls and reporting obligations of public
companies; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to manage our rapid growth, train additional personnel and improve
our financial and disclosure controls and procedures; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to secure the necessary spectrum and network infrastructure equipment; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to clear the Auction 66 Market spectrum of incumbent licensees; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to adequately enforce or protect our intellectual property rights; |
|
|
|
|
governmental regulation of our services and the costs of compliance and any
failure to comply with such regulations; |
|
|
|
|
our capital structure, including our indebtedness amounts; |
|
|
|
|
changes in consumer preferences or demand for our products; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to attract and retain key members of management; and |
|
|
|
|
other factors described under Risk Factors
disclosed in Item 1A. Risk Factors. |
20
The forward-looking statements and projections are subject to and involve risks, uncertainties
and assumptions and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and
projections. All future written and oral forward-looking statements and projections attributable to
us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by our cautionary
statements. We do not intend to, and do not undertake a duty to, update any forward-looking
statement or projection in the future to reflect the occurrence of events or circumstances, except
as required by law.
Company Overview
Except as expressly stated, the financial condition and results of operations discussed
throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
are those of MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. References to
MetroPCS, MetroPCS Communications, our Company, the Company, we, our, ours and us
refer to MetroPCS Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Unless otherwise indicated, all share numbers and per share prices give effect to a 3 for 1 stock
split effected by means of a stock dividend of two shares of common stock for each share of common
stock issued and outstanding at the close of business on March 14, 2007. On April 18, 2007, the
registration statement for our initial public offering became effective and our common stock began
trading on New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PCS
on April 19, 2007. We consummated our initial public offering on
April 24, 2007.
We are a wireless telecommunications carrier that currently offers wireless broadband personal
communication services, or PCS, primarily in the greater Atlanta, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Miami,
San Francisco, Sacramento and Tampa/Sarasota/Orlando metropolitan areas. We launched service in the
greater Atlanta, Miami and Sacramento metropolitan areas in the first quarter of 2002; in San
Francisco in September 2002; in Tampa/Sarasota in October 2005; in Dallas/Ft. Worth in March 2006;
in Detroit in April 2006; and Orlando in November 2006. In 2005, Royal Street Communications, LLC,
or Royal Street Communications, and with its wholly-owned subsidiaries (Royal Street), a company
in which we own 85% of the limited liability company member interests and with which we have a
wholesale arrangement allowing us to sell MetroPCS-branded services to the public, was granted
licenses by the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, in Los Angeles and various metropolitan
areas throughout northern Florida. Royal Street is in the process of constructing its network
infrastructure in its licensed metropolitan areas. We commenced commercial services in Orlando and
certain portions of northern Florida in November 2006 and we expect to begin offering services in
Los Angeles in late second or most likely the third quarter of 2007 through our arrangements with Royal Street.
As a result of the significant growth we have experienced since we launched operations, our
results of operations to date are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected in
future periods. Moreover, we expect that our number of customers will continue to increase, which
will continue to contribute to increases in our revenues and operating expenses. In November 2006,
we were granted advanced wireless services, or AWS, licenses covering a total unique population of
approximately 117 million for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $1.4 billion.
Approximately 69 million of the total licensed population associated with our Auction 66 licenses
represents expansion opportunities in geographic areas outside of our Core and Expansion Markets,
which we refer to as our Auction 66 Markets. These new expansion opportunities in our Auction 66
Markets cover six of the 25 largest metropolitan areas in the United States. The balance of our
Auction 66 Markets, which cover a population of approximately 48 million, supplements or expands
the geographic boundaries of our existing operations in Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Los Angeles, San
Francisco and Sacramento. We currently plan to focus on building out approximately 40 million of
the total population in our Auction 66 Markets with a primary focus on the New York, Philadelphia,
Boston and Las Vegas metropolitan areas. Of the approximate 40 million total population, we are
targeting launch of operations with an initial covered population of approximately 30 to 32 million
by late 2008 or early 2009. Total estimated capital expenditures to the launch of these operations
are expected to be between $18 and $20 per covered population, which equates to a total capital
investment of approximately $550 million to $650 million. Total estimated expenditures, including
capital expenditures, to become free cash flow positive, defined as Adjusted EBITDA less capital
expenditures, is expected to be approximately $29 to $30 per covered population, which equates to
$875 million to $1.0 billion based on an estimated initial covered population of approximately 30
to 32 million. We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments,
proceeds from our recently completed initial public offering, and our anticipated cash flows from
operations will be sufficient to fully fund this planned expansion.
21
We sell products and services to customers through our Company-owned retail stores as well as
indirectly through relationships with independent retailers. We offer service which allows our
customers to place unlimited local calls from within our local service area and to receive
unlimited calls from any area while in our local service area, through flat rate monthly plans
starting at $30 per month. For an additional $5 to $20 per month, our customers may select a
service plan that offers additional services, such as unlimited nationwide long distance service,
voicemail, caller ID, call waiting, text messaging, mobile Internet browsing, push e-mail and
picture and multimedia messaging. We offer flat rate monthly plans at $30, $35, $40, $45 and $50.
All of these plans require payment in advance for one month of service. If no payment is made in
advance for the following month of service, service is discontinued at the end of the month that
was paid for by the customer. For additional fees, we also provide international long distance and
text messaging, ringtones, games and content applications, unlimited directory assistance, ring
back tones, nationwide roaming and other value-added services. As of March 31, 2007, over 85% of
our customers have selected either our $40 or $45 rate plans. Our flat rate plans differentiate our
service from the more complex plans and long-term contract requirements of traditional wireless
carriers. In addition, the above products and services are offered by us in the Royal Street
markets. Our arrangements with Royal Street are based on a wholesale model under which we purchase up to 85% of the
network capacity of Royal Streets systems from Royal Street to allow us to offer our standard products and services in the
Royal Street markets to MetroPCS customers under the MetroPCS brand name.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. We have
discussed those estimates that we believe are critical and require the use of complex judgment in
their application in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of OperationsCritical Accounting Policies and Estimates of our 2006 Form 10-K filed with
the SEC on March 30, 2007. Our accounting policy for income taxes was recently modified due to the
adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, (FIN 48) and is described below.
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FIN 48, which clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109.
FIN 48 provides guidance on the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures, and transition.
FIN 48 requires significant judgment in determining what constitutes an individual tax position as
well as assessing the outcome of each tax position. Changes in judgment as to recognition or
measurement of tax positions can materially affect the estimate of the effective tax rate and
consequently, affect our operating results.
Other than the adoption of FIN 48, our critical accounting policies and the methodologies and
assumptions we apply under them have not materially changed from our 2006 Form 10-K.
Customer Recognition and Disconnect Policies
When a new customer subscribes to our service, the first month of service and activation fee
is included with the handset purchase. Under GAAP, we are required to allocate the purchase price
to the handset and to the wireless service revenue. Generally, the amount allocated to the handset
will be less than our cost, and this difference is included in Cost Per Gross Addition, or CPGA. We
recognize new customers as gross customer additions upon activation of service. Prior to January
23, 2006, we offered our customers the Metro Promise, which allowed a customer to return a newly
purchased handset for a full refund prior to the earlier of 7 days or 60 minutes of use. Beginning
on January 23, 2006, we expanded the terms of the Metro Promise to allow a customer to return a
newly purchased handset for a full refund prior to the earlier of 30 days or 60 minutes of use.
Customers who return their phones under the Metro Promise are reflected as a reduction to gross
customer additions. Customers monthly service payments are due in advance every month. Our
customers must pay their monthly service amount by the payment date or their service will be
suspended, or hotlined, and the customer will not be able to make or receive calls on our network.
However, a hotlined customer is still able to make E-911 calls in the event of an emergency. There
is no service grace period. Any call attempted by a hotlined customer is routed directly to our
interactive
22
voice response system and customer service center in order to arrange payment. If the customer
pays the amount due within 30 days of the original payment date then the customers service is
restored. If a hotlined customer does not pay the amount due within 30 days of the payment date the
account is disconnected and counted as churn. Once an account is disconnected we charge a $15
reconnect fee upon reactivation to reestablish service and the revenue associated with this fee is
deferred and recognized over the estimated life of the customer.
Revenues
We derive our revenues from the following sources:
Service. We sell wireless broadband PCS services. The various types of service revenues
associated with wireless broadband PCS for our customers include monthly recurring charges for
airtime, monthly recurring charges for optional features (including nationwide long distance and
text messaging, ringtones, games and content applications, unlimited
directory assistance, mobile Internet browsing, push e-mail, ring
back tones and nationwide roaming) and charges for long distance service. Service revenues also
include intercarrier compensation and nonrecurring activation service charges to customers.
Equipment. We sell wireless broadband PCS handsets and accessories that are used by our
customers in connection with our wireless services. This equipment is also sold to our independent
retailers to facilitate distribution to our customers.
Costs and Expenses
Our costs and expenses include:
Cost of Service. The major components of our cost of service are:
|
|
|
Cell Site Costs. We incur expenses for the rent of cell sites, network
facilities, engineering operations, field technicians and related utility and
maintenance charges. |
|
|
|
|
Intercarrier Compensation. We pay charges to other telecommunications companies
for their transport and termination of calls originated by our customers and destined
for customers of other networks. These variable charges are based on our customers
usage and generally applied at pre-negotiated rates with other carriers, although some
carriers have sought to impose such charges unilaterally. |
|
|
|
|
Variable Long Distance. We pay charges to other telecommunications companies for
long distance service provided to our customers. These variable charges are based on our
customers usage, applied at pre-negotiated rates with the long distance carriers. |
Cost of Equipment. We purchase wireless broadband PCS handsets and accessories from
third-party vendors to resell to our customers and independent retailers in connection with our
services. We subsidize the sale of handsets to encourage the sale and use of our services. We do
not manufacture any of this equipment.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Our selling expense includes advertising and
promotional costs associated with marketing and selling to new customers and fixed charges such
as retail store rent and retail associates salaries. General and administrative expense
includes support functions including, technical operations, finance, accounting, human
resources, information technology and legal services. We record stock-based compensation expense
in cost of service and selling, general and administrative expenses associated with employee
stock options which is measured at the date of grant, based on the estimated fair value of the
award.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation is applied using the straight-line method over
the estimated useful lives of the assets once the assets are placed in service, which are ten
years for network infrastructure assets and capitalized interest, three to seven years for
office equipment, which includes computer equipment, three to seven years for furniture and
fixtures and five years for vehicles. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the term of the
respective leases, which includes renewal periods that are reasonably assured, or the estimated
useful life of the improvement, whichever is shorter.
23
Interest Expense and Interest Income. Interest expense includes interest incurred on our
borrowings, amortization of debt issuance costs and amortization of discounts and premiums on
long-term debt. Interest income is earned primarily on our cash and cash equivalents and
short-term investments.
Income Taxes. As a result of our operating losses and accelerated depreciation available
under federal tax laws, we have paid no significant federal or state income taxes through March
31, 2007.
Seasonality
Our customer activity is influenced by seasonal effects related to traditional retail selling
periods and other factors that arise from our target customer base. Based on historical results, we
generally expect net customer additions to be strongest in the first and fourth quarters. Softening
of sales and increased customer turnover, or churn, in the second and third quarters of the year
usually combine to result in fewer net customer additions. However, sales activity and churn can be
strongly affected by the launch of new markets and promotional activity, which have the ability to
reduce or outweigh certain seasonal effects.
Operating Segments
Operating segments are defined by SFAS No. 131 Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and
Related Information, (SFAS No. 131), as components of an enterprise about which separate
financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision
maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Our chief operating
decision maker is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.
As of March 31, 2007, we had eight operating segments based on geographic region within the
United States: Atlanta, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Miami, San Francisco, Sacramento,
Tampa/Sarasota/Orlando and Los Angeles. Each of these operating segments provide wireless voice and
data services and products to customers in its service areas or is currently constructing a network
in order to provide these services. These services include unlimited local and long distance
calling, voicemail, caller ID, call waiting, text messaging, picture and multimedia messaging,
international long distance and text messaging, ringtones, games and content applications,
unlimited directory assistance, ring back tones, nationwide roaming,
mobile Internet browsing, push e-mail and
other value-added services.
We aggregate our operating segments into two reportable segments: Core Markets and Expansion
Markets.
|
|
|
Core Markets, which include Atlanta, Miami, San Francisco, and Sacramento, are
aggregated because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief operating decision
maker, they are similar in respect to their products and services, production processes,
class of customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment and currently exhibit
similar financial performance and economic characteristics. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets, which include Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit, Tampa/Sarasota/Orlando and
Los Angeles, are aggregated because they are reviewed on an aggregate basis by the chief
operating decision maker, they are similar in respect to their products and services,
production processes, class of customer, method of distribution, and regulatory environment
and have similar expected long-term financial performance and economic characteristics. |
General corporate overhead, which includes expenses such as corporate employee labor costs,
rent and utilities, legal, accounting and auditing expenses, is allocated equally across all
operating segments. Corporate marketing and advertising expenses are allocated equally to the
operating segments, beginning in the period during which we launch service in that operating
segment. Expenses associated with our national data center are allocated based on the average
number of customers in each operating segment. There are no transactions between reportable
segments.
Interest expense, interest income, gain/loss on extinguishment of debt and income taxes are
not allocated to the segments in the computation of segment operating results for internal
evaluation purposes.
24
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
Set forth below is a summary of certain financial information by reportable operating segment
for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
Reportable Operating Segment Data |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
336,934 |
|
|
$ |
264,597 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
102,582 |
|
|
|
10,819 |
|
|
|
* |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
439,516 |
|
|
$ |
275,416 |
|
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
68,268 |
|
|
$ |
50,047 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
28,902 |
|
|
|
3,998 |
|
|
|
* |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
97,170 |
|
|
$ |
54,045 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding depreciation and amortization disclosed
separately below) (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
100,440 |
|
|
$ |
78,932 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
44,707 |
|
|
|
13,557 |
|
|
|
* |
* |
Other (3) |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
145,335 |
|
|
$ |
92,489 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
113,240 |
|
|
$ |
90,928 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
60,068 |
|
|
|
9,983 |
|
|
|
* |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
173,308 |
|
|
$ |
100,911 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding
depreciation and amortization disclosed separately below)(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
43,296 |
|
|
$ |
37,475 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
28,838 |
|
|
|
13,962 |
|
|
|
* |
* |
Other (3) |
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
72,937 |
|
|
$ |
51,437 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit)(2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
150,322 |
|
|
$ |
109,120 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(22,685 |
) |
|
|
* |
* |
Other (3) |
|
|
(884 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
* |
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
28,105 |
|
|
$ |
25,007 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
10,063 |
|
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
* |
* |
Other (3) |
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
39,380 |
|
|
$ |
27,260 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
2,095 |
|
|
$ |
1,811 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
* |
Other (3) |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,211 |
|
|
$ |
1,811 |
|
|
|
133 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Markets |
|
$ |
117,225 |
|
|
$ |
72,055 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
Expansion Markets |
|
|
(12,186 |
) |
|
|
(24,350 |
) |
|
|
50 |
% |
Other (3) |
|
|
(2,363 |
) |
|
|
(706 |
) |
|
|
(235 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
102,676 |
|
|
$ |
46,999 |
|
|
|
118 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
Not meaningful. |
|
(1) |
|
Cost of service and selling, general and administrative expenses include stock-based
compensation expense. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, cost of service includes $0.2
million and selling, general and administrative expenses includes $4.0 million of stock-based
compensation expense. For the three months ended March 31, 2006, selling, general and
administrative expenses includes $1.8 million of stock-based compensation expense. |
25
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Core and Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit) is presented in accordance with SFAS No.
131 as it is the primary financial measure utilized by management to facilitate evaluation of
our ability to meet future debt service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements
and to fund future growth. |
|
(3) |
|
Other includes expenses associated with the AWS
licenses we were granted in November 2006 as a result of FCC
Auction 66. These expenses are
presented in the Other column as utilization of the Auction 66 AWS licenses in our
operations has not commenced and we have not allocated the Auction 66 AWS licenses to a
reportable segment as of March 31, 2007. |
Service Revenues. Service revenues increased $164.1 million, or 60%, to $439.5 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $275.4 million for the three months ended March 31,
2006. The increase is due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets service revenues as
follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets service revenues increased $72.3 million, or 27%, to $336.9
million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $264.6 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2006. The increase in service revenues is primarily attributable to net
additions of approximately 429,000 customers for the twelve months ended March 31, 2007,
which accounted for $55.2 million of the Core Markets increase, coupled with the migration
of existing customers to higher priced rate plans accounting for $17.1 million of the Core
Markets increase. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets service revenues increased $91.8 million to $102.6
million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $10.8 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2006. The increase in service revenues is primarily attributable to the
launch of the Dallas/Ft. Worth metropolitan area in March 2006, the Detroit metropolitan
area in April 2006 and the expansion of the Tampa/Sarasota area to include the Orlando
metropolitan area in November 2006. These new markets contributed to net additions of
approximately 796,000 customers for the twelve months ended March 31, 2007, which accounted
for $75.2 million of the Expansion Markets increase, coupled with the migration of existing
customers to higher priced rate plans accounting for $16.6 million of the Expansion Markets
increase. |
|
|
|
|
The increase in customers migrating to higher priced rate plans is primarily the result of
our emphasis on offering additional services under our $45 rate plan which includes unlimited
nationwide long distance and various unlimited data features. This migration is expected to
continue as our higher priced rate plans become more attractive to our existing customer
base. |
Equipment Revenues. Equipment revenues increased $43.1 million, or 80%, to $97.2 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $54.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
The increase is due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets equipment revenues as
follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets equipment revenues increased $18.2 million, or 36%, to $68.3
million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $50.1 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2006. The increase in equipment revenues is primarily attributable to the
sale of higher priced handset models accounting for $14.7 million of the increase, coupled
with the increase in gross customer additions of approximately 31,000 customers for the
three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006, which accounted
for $3.5 million of the increase. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets equipment revenues increased $24.9 million to
$28.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $4.0 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2006. The increase in equipments revenues is primarily attributable
to the launch of the Dallas/Ft. Worth metropolitan area in March 2006, the Detroit
metropolitan area in April 2006 and the expansion of the Tampa/Sarasota area to include the
Orlando metropolitan area in November 2006. These new markets contributed to gross
additions of approximately 287,000 customers for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as
compared to the same period in 2006, which accounted for $16.2 million of the Expansion
Markets increase, coupled with the sale of higher priced handset models accounting for $8.7
million of the Expansion Markets increase. |
|
|
|
|
The increase in handset model availability is primarily the result of our emphasis on
enhancing our product offerings and appealing to our customer base in connection with our
wireless services. |
26
Cost of Service. Cost of service increased $52.8 million, or 57%, to $145.3 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2007 from $92.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The
increase is due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets cost of service as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets cost of service increased $21.5 million, or 27%, to $100.4
million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $78.9 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2006. The increase was primarily attributable to a $9.8 million increase in
FUSF fees, a $2.5 million increase in cell site and switch facility lease expense, a $2.4
million increase in customer service expense, a $1.9 million increase in long distance
costs, a $1.6 million increase in E-911 fees and a $1.1 million increase in data services
expense, all of which are as a result of the 21% growth in our Core Markets customer base
and the addition of approximately 325 cell sites to our existing network infrastructure
during the twelve months ended March 31, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets cost of service increased $31.1 million to $44.7
million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $13.6 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2006. The increase was primarily attributable to the launch of the
Dallas/Ft. Worth metropolitan area in March 2006, the Detroit metropolitan area in April
2006 and the expansion of the Tampa/Sarasota area to include the Orlando metropolitan area
in November 2006. These new markets contributed to net additions of approximately 796,000
customers during the twelve months ended March 31, 2007. The increase in cost of service is
primarily attributable to a $6.2 million increase in cell site and switch facility lease
expense, a $4.7 million increase in customer service expense, a $4.7 million increase in
intercarrier compensation, a $4.1 million increase in long distance costs, a $2.9 million
increase in employee costs, a $1.9 million increase in billing expenses and a $1.8 million
increase in data services. |
Cost of Equipment. Cost of equipment increased $72.4 million, or 72%, to $173.3 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $100.9 million for the three months ended March 31,
2006. The increase is due to increases in Core Markets and Expansion Markets cost of equipment as
follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets cost of equipment increased $22.3 million, or 25%, to $113.2
million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $90.9 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2006. The increase in equipment costs is primarily attributable to the sale
of higher cost handset models accounting for $15.9 million of the increase. The increase in
gross customer additions during the three months ended March 31, 2007 of approximately
31,000 customers as well as the sale of new handsets to existing customers accounted for
$6.4 million of the Core Markets increase. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets cost of equipment increased $50.1 million to $60.1
million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $10.0 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2006. These costs were primarily attributable to the launch of the
Dallas/Ft. Worth metropolitan area in March 2006, the Detroit metropolitan area in April
2006 and the expansion of the Tampa/Sarasota area to include the Orlando metropolitan area
in November 2006. These new markets contributed to gross additions of approximately
287,000 customers for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period
in 2006 which accounted for $40.5 million of the Expansion Markets increase, coupled with
the sale of new handsets to existing customers accounting for $9.6 million of the Expansion
Markets increase. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $21.5 million, or 42%, to $72.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from
$51.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The increase is due to increases in Core
Markets and Expansion Markets selling, general and administrative expenses as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets selling, general and
administrative expenses increased $5.8
million, or 16%, to $43.3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 from $37.5
million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Selling expenses increased by $1.8
million, or approximately 12% for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the
three months ended March 31, 2006. General and administrative
expenses increased $4.0
million, or approximately 18% for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the
same period in 2006. The increase in selling expenses is primarily due to an increase in
employee costs which were incurred to support the growth in the Core Markets, coupled with
an increase in |
27
|
|
|
general and administrative expenses, which were higher during the three months ended March
31, 2007 primarily due to an increase in insurance cost as well as an increase in various
administrative expenses.. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $14.9 million to $28.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from
$14.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Selling expenses increased by
$8.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2006. This increase is related to employees costs as
well as an increase in marketing and
advertising expenses associated with the growth in the Expansion
Markets. General and administrative expenses increased by $6.9 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 due to labor,
rent, legal and professional fees and various administrative expenses incurred in relation
to the growth in the Expansion Markets as well as
the build-out expenses related to the Los Angeles metropolitan area. |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $12.1 million,
or 44%, to $39.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $27.3 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2006. The increase is primarily due to increases in Core Markets and
Expansion Markets depreciation expense as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets depreciation and amortization expense increased $3.1
million, or 12%, to $28.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $25.0
million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The increase related primarily to an
increase in network infrastructure assets placed into service during the twelve months
ended March 31, 2007. We added approximately 325 cell sites in our Core Markets during this
period to increase the capacity of our existing network and expand our footprint. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets depreciation and amortization expense increased
$8.5 million to $10.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $1.5 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The increase is attributable to network
infrastructure assets placed into service as a result of the launch of the Dallas/Ft. Worth
metropolitan area, the Detroit metropolitan area and the expansion of the Tampa/Sarasota
area to include the Orlando metropolitan area. |
Stock-Based Compensation Expense. Stock-based compensation expense increased $2.4 million, or
133%, to $4.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $1.8 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2006. The increase is primarily due to increases in Core Markets and
Expansion Markets stock-based compensation expense as follows:
|
|
|
Core Markets. Core Markets stock-based compensation expense increased $0.3 million, or
16%, to $2.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $1.8 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2006. The increase is primarily
related to an increase in stock options granted throughout the twelve
months ended March 31, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Expansion Markets. Expansion Markets stock-based compensation expense increased $2.0
million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. This expense is attributable to stock
options granted to employees in our Expansion Markets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
Consolidated Data |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
10,365 |
|
|
|
(71 |
)% |
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
)% |
Interest expense |
|
|
48,976 |
|
|
|
20,884 |
|
|
|
135 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
24,267 |
|
|
|
12,377 |
|
|
|
96 |
% |
Net income |
|
|
36,352 |
|
|
|
18,370 |
|
|
|
98 |
% |
28
Loss on Disposal of Assets. Loss on disposal of assets decreased $7.3 million, or 71%, to
$3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $10.4 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2006. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, certain network technology
related to our cell sites in certain markets was retired and replaced with new technology.
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we extinguished
microwave clearing obligations resulting in a gain on extinguishment of debt in the amount of $0.2
million.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $28.1 million, or 135%, to $49.0 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2007 from $20.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The
increase in interest expense was primarily due to increased average principal balance outstanding
as a result of borrowings of $1.6 billion under our senior secured credit facility and $1.0 billion
under our 91/4% senior notes during the fourth quarter of 2006. The average debt outstanding under
our previous debt facilities for the three months ending March 31, 2006 was $904.3 million. The
weighted average interest rate decreased to 8.24% for the three months ended March 31, 2007
compared to 10.40% for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as a result of the borrowing rates
under the senior secured credit facility,
91/4% senior notes and the interest rate hedge. The increase in interest expense was partially offset by the capitalization of
$5.6 million of interest during the three months ended March 31, 2007, compared to $2.0 million of
interest capitalized during the same period in 2006. We capitalize interest costs associated with
our FCC licenses and property and equipment during the construction of a new market. The amount of
such capitalized interest depends on the carrying values of the FCC licenses and construction in
progress involved in those markets and the duration of the construction process. We expect
capitalized interest to be significant during the construction of the
markets associated with the AWS licenses we were granted in
November 2006 as a result of Auction 66.
Provision for Income Taxes. Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2007
increased to $24.3 million, which is approximately 40% of our income before provision for income
taxes. For the three months ended March 31, 2006 the provision for income taxes was $12.4 million,
or approximately 40% of income before provision for income taxes.
Net Income. Net income increased $18.0 million, or 98%, to $36.4 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 compared to $18.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The
increase is primarily attributable to an increase in operating income in the Dallas/Ft. Worth,
Detroit and the Tampa/Sarasota/Orlando metropolitan areas. The increase in operating income was
achieved through cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our business in these markets. In
addition, growth in average customers of approximately 55% during the twelve months ended March 31,
2007 contributed to an increase in net income during the first three months of 2007. However,
these benefits have been partially offset by an increase in interest expense due to an increased
average principal balance outstanding as a result of borrowings of $1.6 billion under our senior
secured credit facility and $1.0 billion under our 91/4% senior notes during the fourth quarter of
2006.
Performance Measures
In managing our business and assessing our financial performance, we supplement the
information provided by financial statement measures with several customer-focused performance
metrics that are widely used in the wireless industry. These metrics include average revenue per
user per month, or ARPU, which measures service revenue per customer; cost per gross customer
addition, or CPGA, which measures the average cost of acquiring a new customer; cost per user per
month, or CPU, which measures the non-selling cash cost of operating our business on a per customer
basis; and churn, which measures turnover in our customer base. For a reconciliation of Non-GAAP
performance measures and a further discussion of the measures, please read Reconciliation of
Non-GAAP Financial Measures below.
29
The following table shows consolidated metric information for the three months ended March 31,
2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
|
3,395,203 |
|
|
|
2,170,059 |
|
Net additions |
|
|
454,217 |
|
|
|
245,438 |
|
Churn: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average monthly rate |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
ARPU |
|
$ |
43.75 |
|
|
$ |
43.12 |
|
CPGA |
|
$ |
108.80 |
|
|
$ |
106.26 |
|
CPU |
|
$ |
18.56 |
|
|
$ |
20.11 |
|
Customers. Net customer additions were 454,217 for the three months ended March 31, 2007,
compared to 245,438 for the three months ended March 31, 2006, an increase of 85%. Total customers
were 3,395,203 as of March 31, 2007, an increase of 56% over the customer total as of March 31,
2006 and 15% over the customer total as of December 31, 2006. These increases are primarily
attributable to the continued demand for our service offering and the launch of our services in the
Dallas/Ft. Worth metropolitan area in March 2006, the Detroit metropolitan area in April 2006 and
the expansion of the Tampa/Sarasota area to include the Orlando metropolitan area in November 2006.
Churn. As we do not require a long-term service contract, our churn percentage is expected to
be higher than traditional wireless carriers that require customers to sign a one- to two-year
contract with significant early termination fees. Average monthly churn represents (a) the number
of customers who have been disconnected from our system during the measurement period less the
number of customers who have reactivated service, divided by (b) the sum of the average monthly
number of customers during such period. We classify delinquent customers as churn after they have
been delinquent for 30 days. In addition, when an existing customer establishes a new account in
connection with the purchase of an upgraded or replacement phone and does not identify themselves
as an existing customer, we count that phone leaving service as a churn and the new phone entering
service as a gross customer addition. Churn for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was 4.0%
compared to 4.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Based upon a change in the allowable
return period from 7 days to 30 days, we revised our definition of gross customer additions to
exclude customers that discontinue service in the first 30 days of service. This revision reduces
deactivations and gross customer additions commencing March 23, 2006, and reduces churn. We
estimated that churn computed under the original 7 day allowable return period would have been 4.5%
and 4.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Average monthly churn
rate for selected traditional wireless carriers ranges from 1.0% to 2.6% for post-pay customers and
over 6.0% for pre-pay customers based on public filings or press releases.
Average Revenue Per User. ARPU represents (a) service revenues less activation revenues,
E-911, Federal Universal Service Fund, or FUSF, and vendors compensation charges for the
measurement period, divided by (b) the sum of the average monthly number of customers during such
period. ARPU was $43.75 and $43.12 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, an increase of $0.63, or 1%. The increase in ARPU was primarily the result of
attracting customers to higher priced service plans, which include unlimited nationwide long
distance for $40 per month as well as unlimited nationwide long distance and certain calling and
data features on an unlimited basis for $45 per month.
Cost Per Gross Addition. CPGA is determined by dividing (a) selling expenses plus the total
cost of equipment associated with transactions with new customers less activation revenues and
equipment revenues associated with transactions with new customers during the measurement period by
(b) gross customer additions during such period. Retail customer service expenses and equipment
margin on handsets sold to existing customers when they are identified, including handset upgrade
transactions, are excluded, as these costs are incurred specifically for existing customers. CPGA
costs have increased to $108.80 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $106.26 for the
three months ended March 31, 2006, which was primarily driven by the selling expenses associated
with the customer growth in our Expansion Markets as well as the
higher cost associated with the sale of higher priced handset models. In addition, on
January 23, 2006, we revised the terms of our return policy from 7 days to 30 days, and as a result
we revised our definition of gross customer additions to exclude
30
customers that discontinue service in the first 30 days of service. This revision, commencing
March 23, 2006, reduces deactivations and gross customer additions and increases CPGA. CPGA
computed under the original 7 day allowable return period would have been $103.11 and $105.33 for
the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Cost Per User. CPU is cost of service and general and administrative costs (excluding
applicable non-cash stock-based compensation expense included in cost of service and general and
administrative expense) plus net loss on handset equipment transactions unrelated to initial
customer acquisition (which includes the gain or loss on sale of handsets to existing customers and
costs associated with handset replacements and repairs (other than warranty costs which are the
responsibility of the handset manufacturers)), divided by the sum of the average monthly number of
customers during such period. CPU for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was $18.56 and
$20.11, respectively. We continue to achieve cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our
business, which contributed to the decrease in CPU for the three
months ended March 31, 2007. However, these benefits have been partially offset by construction
expenses associated with our Expansion Markets, which contributed
approximately $2.83 of
CPU for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Core Markets Performance Measures
Set forth below is a summary of certain key performance measures for the periods indicated for
our Core Markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Core Markets Customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
|
2,484,811 |
|
|
|
2,055,550 |
|
Net additions |
|
|
183,853 |
|
|
|
183,885 |
|
Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
150,322 |
|
|
$ |
109,120 |
|
Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a Percent of
Service Revenues |
|
|
44.6 |
% |
|
|
41.2 |
% |
We launched our service initially in 2002 in the greater Miami, Atlanta, Sacramento and
San Francisco metropolitan areas. Our Core Markets have a licensed population of approximately 25
million, of which our networks currently cover approximately 22 million. In addition, we had
positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, gain/loss on
disposal of assets, accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary, gain/loss on
extinguishment of debt, cumulative effect of change in accounting principle and non-cash
stock-based compensation, or Adjusted EBITDA, in our Core Markets after only four full quarters of
operations.
Customers. Net customer additions in our Core Markets were 183,853 for the three months ended
March 31, 2007, compared to 183,885 for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Total customers were
2,484,811 as of March 31, 2007, an increase of 21% over the customer total as of March 31, 2006 and
8% over the customer total as of December 31, 2006. The increase in total customers is primarily
attributable to the continued demand for our service offering.
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131 as it is the
primary performance metric for which our reportable segments are evaluated and it is utilized by
management to facilitate evaluation of our ability to meet future debt service, capital
expenditures and working capital requirements and to fund future growth. For the three months ended
March 31, 2007, Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA was $150.3 million compared to $109.1 million for the
same period in 2006. We continue to experience increases in Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a
result of continued customer growth and cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our business
in the Core Markets.
Adjusted EBITDA as a Percent of Service Revenues. Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service
revenues is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by total service revenues. Core Markets Adjusted
EBITDA as a percent of service revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was 45%
and 41%, respectively. Consistent with the increase in Core Markets Adjusted EBITDA, we continue to
experience corresponding increases in Core
31
Markets Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of service revenues due to the growth in service revenues
as well as cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our business in the Core Markets.
Expansion Markets Performance Measures
Set forth below is a summary of certain key performance measures for the periods indicated for
our Expansion Markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Expansion Markets Customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
|
910,392 |
|
|
|
114,509 |
|
Net additions |
|
|
270,364 |
|
|
|
61,553 |
|
Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit) |
|
$ |
(121 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,685 |
) |
Customers. Net customer additions in our Expansion Markets were 270,364 for the three
months ended March 31, 2007, compared to 61,553 for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Total
customers were 910,392 as of March 31, 2007, an increase of 695% over the customer total as of
March 31, 2006 and a 42% over the customer total as of December 31, 2006. The increase in 2007 as
compared to the same period in 2006 is primarily attributable to the launch of the Dallas/Ft. Worth
metropolitan area in March 2006, the Detroit metropolitan area in April 2006 and the expansion of
the Tampa/Sarasota area to include the Orlando metropolitan area in November 2006.
Adjusted EBITDA (Deficit). Adjusted EBITDA is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131 as it
is the primary performance metric for which our reportable segments are evaluated and it is
utilized by management to facilitate evaluation of our ability to meet future debt service, capital
expenditures and working capital requirements and to fund future growth. For the three months ended
March 31, 2007, Expansion Markets Adjusted EBITDA deficit was
$0.1 million compared to $22.7
million for the same period in 2006. The decrease in Adjusted EBITDA deficit, when compared to the
same periods in the previous year, was attributable to the growth in service revenues in the
Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit and Tampa/Sarasota/Orlando metropolitan areas as well as the achievement
of cost benefits due to the increasing scale of our business in these metropolitan areas.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We utilize certain financial measures and key performance indicators that are not calculated
in accordance with GAAP to assess our financial and operating performance. A non-GAAP financial
measure is defined as a numerical measure of a companys financial performance that (i) excludes
amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of excluding amounts, that are included
in the comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP in the statement of
income or statement of cash flows; or (ii) includes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have
the effect of including amounts, that are excluded from the comparable measure so calculated and
presented.
ARPU, CPGA, and CPU are non-GAAP financial measures utilized by our management to judge our
ability to meet our liquidity requirements and to evaluate our operating performance. We believe
these measures are important in understanding the performance of our operations from period to
period, and although every company in the wireless industry does not define each of these measures
in precisely the same way, we believe that these measures (which are common in the wireless
industry) facilitate key liquidity and operating performance comparisons with other companies in
the wireless industry. The following tables reconcile our non-GAAP financial measures with our
financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP.
ARPU We utilize ARPU to evaluate our per-customer service revenue realization and to assist
in forecasting our future service revenues. ARPU is calculated exclusive of activation revenues, as
these amounts are a component of our costs of acquiring new customers and are included in our
calculation of CPGA. ARPU is also calculated exclusive of E-911, FUSF and vendors compensation
charges, as these are generally pass through charges that we collect from our customers and remit
to the appropriate government agencies.
32
Average number of customers for any measurement period is determined by dividing (a) the sum
of the average monthly number of customers for the measurement period by (b) the number of months
in such period. Average monthly number of customers for any month represents the sum of the number
of customers on the first day of the month and the last day of the month divided by two. The
following table shows the calculation of ARPU for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except average |
|
|
|
number of customers and ARPU) |
|
Calculation of Average Revenue Per User (ARPU): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues |
|
$ |
439,516 |
|
|
$ |
275,416 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activation revenues |
|
|
(2,459 |
) |
|
|
(1,923 |
) |
E-911, FUSF and vendors compensation charges |
|
|
(20,271 |
) |
|
|
(8,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net service revenues |
|
$ |
416,786 |
|
|
$ |
264,535 |
|
Divided by: Average number of customers |
|
|
3,175,284 |
|
|
|
2,045,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARPU |
|
$ |
43.75 |
|
|
$ |
43.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPGA We utilize CPGA to assess the efficiency of our distribution strategy, validate
the initial capital invested in our customers and determine the number of months to recover our
customer acquisition costs. This measure also allows us to compare our average acquisition costs
per new customer to those of other wireless broadband PCS providers. Activation revenues and
equipment revenues related to new customers are deducted from selling expenses in this calculation
as they represent amounts paid by customers at the time their service is activated that reduce our
acquisition cost of those customers. Additionally, equipment costs associated with existing
customers, net of related revenues, are excluded as this measure is intended to reflect only the
acquisition costs related to new customers. The following table reconciles total costs used in the
calculation of CPGA to selling expenses, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure to CPGA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except gross |
|
|
|
customer additions and CPGA) |
|
Calculation of Cost Per Gross Addition (CPGA): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling expenses |
|
$ |
30,106 |
|
|
$ |
20,298 |
|
Less: Activation revenues |
|
|
(2,459 |
) |
|
|
(1,923 |
) |
Less: Equipment revenues |
|
|
(97,170 |
) |
|
|
(54,045 |
) |
Add: Equipment revenue not associated with new customers |
|
|
42,009 |
|
|
|
24,864 |
|
Add: Cost of equipment |
|
|
173,308 |
|
|
|
100,911 |
|
Less: Equipment costs not associated with new customers |
|
|
(55,169 |
) |
|
|
(35,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross addition expenses |
|
$ |
90,625 |
|
|
$ |
54,741 |
|
Divided by: Gross customer additions |
|
|
832,983 |
|
|
|
515,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPGA |
|
$ |
108.80 |
|
|
$ |
106.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPU CPU is cost of service and general and administrative costs (excluding applicable
non-cash stock-based compensation expense included in cost of service and general and
administrative expense) plus net loss on equipment transactions unrelated to initial customer
acquisition (which includes the gain or loss on sale of handsets to existing customers and costs
associated with handset replacements and repairs (other than warranty costs which are the
responsibility of the handset manufacturers)) exclusive of E-911, FUSF and vendors compensation
charges, divided by the sum of the average monthly number of customers during such period. CPU does
not include any depreciation and amortization expense. Management uses CPU as a tool to evaluate
the non-selling cash expenses associated with ongoing business operations on a per customer basis,
to track changes in these non-selling cash costs over time, and to help evaluate how changes in our
business operations affect non-selling cash costs per customer. In addition, CPU provides
management with a useful measure to compare our non-selling cash costs per customer with those of
other wireless providers. We believe investors use CPU primarily as a tool to track changes in our
non-selling cash costs over time and to compare our non-selling cash costs to those of other
wireless providers. Other wireless carriers may calculate this measure differently. The following
table reconciles total costs used in the
33
calculation of CPU to cost of service, which we consider to be the most directly comparable
GAAP financial measure to CPU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except average |
|
|
|
number of customers and CPU) |
|
Calculation of Cost Per User (CPU): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service |
|
$ |
145,335 |
|
|
$ |
92,489 |
|
Add: General and administrative expense |
|
|
42,831 |
|
|
|
31,139 |
|
Add: Net loss on equipment transactions unrelated
to initial customer acquisition |
|
|
13,160 |
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
Less: Stock-based compensation expense included in
cost of service and general and administrative
expense |
|
|
(4,211 |
) |
|
|
(1,811 |
) |
Less: E-911, FUSF and vendors compensation revenues |
|
|
(20,271 |
) |
|
|
(8,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs used in the calculation of CPU |
|
$ |
176,844 |
|
|
$ |
123,359 |
|
Divided by: Average number of customers |
|
|
3,175,284 |
|
|
|
2,045,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPU |
|
$ |
18.56 |
|
|
$ |
20.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments, cash generated from operations, proceeds from our recent
sale of 91/4% senior notes,
our senior secured credit facility and our recently completed initial
public offering. At March 31, 2007, we had a total of approximately $539.7
million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments.
Our strategy has been to offer our services in major metropolitan areas and their surrounding
areas, which we refer to as clusters. We are seeking opportunities to enhance our current market
clusters and to provide service in new geographic areas. From time to time, we may purchase
spectrum and related assets from third parties or the FCC. We participated as a bidder in FCC
Auction 66 and in November 2006 we were granted eight licenses for a total aggregate purchase price
of approximately $1.4 billion.
As a result of the acquisition of the spectrum licenses from Auction 66 and the opportunities
that these licenses provide for us to expand our operations into major metropolitan markets, we
will require significant additional capital in the future to finance the construction and initial
operating costs associated with such licenses, including clearing costs associated with
non-governmental incumbent licenses which we currently estimate to be between approximately $40
million and $60 million. We generally do not intend to commence the construction of any individual
license area until we have sufficient funds available to provide for the related construction and
operating costs associated with such license area. We currently plan to focus on building out
approximately 40 million of the total population in our Auction 66 Markets with a primary focus on
the New York, Philadelphia, Boston and Las Vegas metropolitan areas. Of the approximate 40 million
total population, we are targeting launch of operations with an initial covered population of
approximately 30 to 32 million by late 2008 or early 2009. Total estimated capital expenditures to
the launch of these operations are expected to be between $18 and $20 per covered population which
equates to a total capital investment of approximately $550 million to $650 million. Total
estimated expenditures, including capital expenditures, to become free cash flow positive, defined
as Adjusted EBITDA less capital expenditures, are expected to be approximately $29 to $30 per
covered population, which equates to $875 million to $1.0 billion based on an estimated initial
covered population of approximately 30 to 32 million. We believe that our existing cash, cash
equivalents and short-term investments, proceeds from our recently
completed initial public offering, and our
anticipated cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fully fund this planned expansion.
Moreover, we have made no commitments for capital expenditures and we have the ability to reduce
the rate of capital expenditure deployment.
The construction of our network and the marketing and distribution of our wireless
communications products and services have required, and will continue to require, substantial
capital investment. Capital outlays have included license acquisition costs, capital expenditures
for construction of our network infrastructure, costs associated with clearing and relocating
non-governmental incumbent licenses, funding of operating cash flow losses incurred as we launch
services in new metropolitan areas and other working capital costs, debt service and financing
34
fees and expenses. Our capital expenditures for the first three months of 2007 were
approximately $156.2 million and aggregate capital expenditures for 2006 were approximately $550.7
million. These expenditures were primarily associated with the construction of the network
infrastructure in our Expansion Markets and our efforts to increase the service area and capacity
of our existing Core Markets network through the addition of cell sites and switches. We believe
the increased service area and capacity in existing markets will improve our service offering,
helping us to attract additional customers and increase revenues. In addition, we believe our new
Expansion Markets have attractive demographics which will result in increased revenues.
As of March 31, 2007, we owed an aggregate of approximately $2.6 billion under our senior
secured credit facility and 91/4% Senior Notes. On February 20, 2007, MetroPCS Wireless, Inc.
entered into an amendment to the senior secured credit facility. Under the amendment, the margin
used to determine the senior secured credit facility interest rate was reduced to 2.25% from 2.50%.
Our senior secured credit facility calculates consolidated Adjusted EBITDA as: consolidated
net income plus depreciation and amortization; gain (loss) on disposal of assets; non-cash
expenses; gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt; provision for income taxes; interest expense; and
certain expenses of MetroPCS Communications minus interest and other income and non-cash items
increasing consolidated net income.
We consider Adjusted EBITDA, as defined above, to be an important indicator to investors
because it provides information related to our ability to provide cash flows to meet future debt
service, capital expenditures and working capital requirements and fund future growth. We present
this discussion of Adjusted EBITDA because covenants in our senior secured credit facility contain
ratios based on this measure. If our Adjusted EBITDA were to decline below certain levels,
covenants in our senior secured credit facility that are based on Adjusted EBITDA, including our
maximum senior secured leverage ratio covenant, may be violated and could cause, among other
things, an inability to incur further indebtedness and in certain circumstances a default or
mandatory prepayment under our senior secured credit facility. Our maximum senior secured leverage
ratio is required to be less than 4.5 to 1.0 based on Adjusted EBITDA plus the impact of certain
new markets. The lenders under our senior secured credit facility use the senior secured leverage
ratio to measure our ability to meet our obligations on our senior secured debt by comparing the
total amount of such debt to our Adjusted EBITDA, which our lenders use to estimate our cash flow
from operations. The senior secured leverage ratio is calculated as the ratio of senior secured
indebtedness to Adjusted EBITDA, as defined by our senior secured credit facility. For the twelve
months ended March 31, 2007, our senior secured leverage ratio was 2.91 to 1.0, which means for
every $1.00 of Adjusted EBITDA we had $2.91 of senior secured indebtedness. In addition, consolidated Adjusted EBITDA is also utilized, among other measures, to determine managements
compensation levels. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, and
should not be considered a substitute for, operating income (loss), net income (loss), or any other
measure of financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA
should not be construed as an alternative to, or more meaningful than cash flows from operating
activities, as determined in accordance with GAAP.
The following table shows the calculation of our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in
our senior secured credit facility, for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Calculation of Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
36,352 |
|
|
$ |
18,370 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
39,380 |
|
|
|
27,260 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
10,365 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense (1) |
|
|
4,211 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
48,976 |
|
|
|
20,884 |
|
Accretion of put option in majority-owned subsidiary (1) |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
(7,157 |
) |
|
|
(4,572 |
) |
Gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
24,267 |
|
|
|
12,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
149,317 |
|
|
$ |
86,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents a non-cash expense, as defined by our senior secured credit facility. |
In addition, for further information, the following table reconciles consolidated
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in our senior secured credit facility, to cash flows from operating
activities for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities to Consolidated Adjusted
EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
111,572 |
|
|
$ |
65,628 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
48,976 |
|
|
|
20,884 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
(1,096 |
) |
|
|
(379 |
) |
Interest and other income |
|
|
(7,157 |
) |
|
|
(4,572 |
) |
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
138 |
|
Deferred rent expense |
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
(1,415 |
) |
Cost of abandoned cell sites |
|
|
(1,796 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
24,267 |
|
|
|
12,377 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(23,611 |
) |
|
|
(11,753 |
) |
Changes in working capital |
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
5,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
149,317 |
|
|
$ |
86,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities was $111.6 million during the three months ended March
31, 2007 compared to $65.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2006. The increase was
primarily attributable to a 98% increase in net income during the three months ended March 31, 2007
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006. The timing of payments on accounts payable and
accrued expenses in the three months ended March 31, 2007, as well as an increase in deferred
revenues as a result of the approximately 56% increase in customers at March 31, 2007 compared
March 31, 2006 also contributed to the increase in cash provided by operating activities.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities was $74.1 million during the three months ended March 31,
2007 compared to $138.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2006. The decrease was due
primarily to a $77.4 million increase in net proceeds from investments, partially offset by a $21.5
million increase in purchases of property and equipment which was related to the construction of the
Expansion Markets.
36
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was $32.4 million during the three months ended March
31, 2007 compared to $24.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2006. This increase was
due primarily to the timing of book overdraft liabilities, partially offset by increased payments
for debt issuance costs and principal related to the senior secured credit facility as well as
costs associated with the Companys initial public offering that was completed in April 2007.
Senior Secured Credit Facility
On February 20, 2007, MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. entered into an amendment to the senior secured
credit facility. Under the amendment, the margin used to determine the senior secured credit
facility interest rate was reduced to 2.25% from 2.50%.
Capital Expenditures and Other Asset Acquisitions and Dispositions
Capital Expenditures. We and Royal Street expect to incur approximately $650 million in
capital expenditures for the year ending December 31, 2007 in our Core and Expansion Markets. In
addition we expect to incur approximately $175 million in capital expenditures for the year ending
December 31, 2007 in our Auction 66 Markets.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we and Royal Street incurred $156.2 million in
capital expenditures. These capital expenditures were primarily for the expansion and improvement
of our existing network infrastructure and costs associated with the construction of the Los
Angeles Expansion Market that we expect to launch in late second or
most likely the third quarter of 2007.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, we had $550.7 million in capital expenditures. These
capital expenditures were primarily for the expansion and improvement of our existing network
infrastructure and costs associated with the construction of the Dallas/Ft. Worth, Detroit and
Orlando Expansion Markets that we launched in 2006, as well as the Los Angeles Expansion Market.
Other Acquisitions and Dispositions. We had no other acquisitions or dispositions during the
three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Inflation
We believe that inflation has not materially affected our operations.
Effect of New Accounting Standards
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (SFAS No. 157),
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands
disclosure about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We will be required to adopt
SFAS No. 157 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008. We have not completed our evaluation of the
effect of SFAS No. 157.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, (SFAS No. 159),
which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at
fair value. The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing entities
with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets
and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting
provisions. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We
will be required to adopt SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008. We have not completed our evaluation of
the effect of SFAS No. 159.
37
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market prices and rates,
including interest rates. We do not routinely enter into derivatives or other financial
instruments for trading, speculative or hedging purposes, unless it is required by our credit
agreements. We do not currently conduct business internationally, so we are generally not subject
to foreign currency exchange rate risk.
As of March 31, 2007, we had approximately $1.6 billion in outstanding indebtedness under our
senior secured credit facility that bears interest at floating rates based on the London Inter Bank
Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus 2.25%. The interest rate on the outstanding debt under our senior
secured credit facility as of March 31, 2007 was 7.389%. On November 21, 2006, to manage our
interest rate risk exposure and fulfill a requirement of our senior secured credit facility, we
entered into a three-year interest rate protection agreement. This agreement covers a notional
amount of $1.0 billion and effectively converts this portion of our variable rate debt to fixed
rate debt at an annual rate of 7.169%. The quarterly interest settlement periods began on February
1, 2007. The interest rate swap agreement expires in 2010. If market LIBOR rates increase 100
basis points over the rates in effect at March 31, 2007, annual interest expense on the
approximately $592.0 million in variable rate debt would increase approximately $5.9 million.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported as required by the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to
management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow for appropriate and timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management, with participation by our CEO and CFO, has
designed the Companys disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurance of
achieving these desired objectives. As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(e), we conducted an evaluation,
with the participation of our CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2007, the end of the period covered by this
report. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management
recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is
necessarily required to apply judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible
controls and objectives. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of March 31, 2007, in timely making known to
them material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries required to be disclosed
in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended March 31, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
38
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On June 14, 2006, Leap Wireless International, Inc. and Cricket Communications, Inc., or
collectively Leap, filed suit against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Texas, Marshall Division, Civil Action No. 2-06CV-240-TJW and amended on June 16, 2006,
for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,813,497 Method for Providing Wireless Communication Services
and Network and System for Delivering of Same, or the 497 Patent, issued to Leap. The complaint
seeks both injunctive relief and monetary damages for our alleged infringement of such patent. On
August 3, 2006, we (i) answered the complaint, (ii) raised a number of affirmative defenses, and
(iii) together with two related entities, counterclaimed against Leap and several related entities
and certain current and former employees of Leap, including Leaps CEO. We have also tendered
Leaps claims to the manufacturer of our network infrastructure equipment for indemnity and
defense. In our counterclaims, we claim that we do not infringe any valid or enforceable claim of
the 497 Patent. Certain of the Leap defendants, including its CEO, answered our counterclaims on
October 13, 2006. In its answer, Leap and its CEO denied our allegations and asserted affirmative
defenses to our counterclaims. In connection with denying a motion to dismiss by certain individual
defendants, the court concluded that our claims against those defendants were compulsory
counterclaims. On April 3, 2007 the Court held a scheduling conference at which the Court set the
date for the claim construction hearing for January 2008 and the trial date for August 2008. We
plan to vigorously defend against Leaps claims relating to the 497 Patent.
If Leap were successful in its claim for injunctive relief, we could be enjoined from
operating our business in the manner we currently operate, which could require us to expend
additional capital to change certain of our technologies and operating practices, or could prevent
us from offering some or all of our services using some or all of our existing systems. In
addition, if Leap were successful in its claim for monetary damage, we could be forced to pay Leap
substantial damages for past infringement and/or ongoing royalties on a portion of our revenues,
which could materially adversely impact our financial performance.
On August 15, 2006, we filed a separate action in the California Superior Court, Stanislaus
County, Case No. 382780, against Leap and others for unfair competition, misappropriation of trade
secrets, interference with contracts, breach of contract, intentional interference with prospective
business advantage, and trespass. In this suit we seek monetary and punitive damages and injunctive
relief. Defendants responded to our complaint by filing demurrers on or about January 5, 2007
requesting that the Court dismiss the complaint. On February 1, 2007, the Court granted the
demurrers in part and granted us leave to amend the complaint. We filed a First Amended Complaint
on February 27, 2007. Defendants responded by filing demurrers on March 28, 2007, requesting that
the Court dismiss our First Amended Complaint. On May 1, 2007, the court issued a tentative ruling
granting on its own motion to strike the First Amended Complaint and grant us leave to amend the
First Amended Complaint by on or before May 14, 2007 and held that the defendants demurrers and
motions to strike were moot. We filed a Second Amended Complaint on
May 14, 2007. We intend to vigorously prosecute this complaint.
On September 22, 2006, Royal Street filed a separate action in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, Civil Action No. 8:06-CV-01754-T-23TBM,
seeking a declaratory judgment that Leaps 497 Patent is invalid and not being infringed upon by
Royal Street. Leap responded to Royal Streets complaint by filing a motion to dismiss Royal
Streets complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, that the action
be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall
Division where Leap has brought suit against us under the same patent. Royal Street has responded
to this motion. The Court has set a trial date in October 2008.
In addition, we are involved in litigation from time to time, including litigation regarding
intellectual property claims, that we consider to be in the normal course of business. We are not
currently party to any other pending legal proceedings that we believe would, individually or in
the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
39
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in Item 1A. Risk
Factors of our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 30, 2007 other than changes to the Risk
Factors as set forth below.
We may face additional competition from new entrants in the wireless marketplace, many of whom may
have significantly more resources than we do.
Certain new entrants with significant financial resources participated in Auction 66 and were
designated as the high bidder on spectrum rights in geographic areas served by us. For example,
SpectrumCo acquired 20 MHz of spectrum in all of the metropolitan areas which comprise our Core,
Expansion and Auction 66 Markets. In addition, Leap Wireless offers fixed-rate unlimited service
plans similar to ours and acquired spectrum which overlaps some of the metropolitan areas we serve
or plan to serve. These licenses could be used to provide services directly competitive with our
services.
The auction and licensing of new spectrum, including the spectrum recently auctioned by the
FCC in Auction 66, may result in new competitors and/or allow existing competitors to acquire
additional spectrum, which could allow them to offer services that we may not technologically or
cost effectively be able to offer with the licenses we hold or to which we have access. The FCC has
already designated an additional 60 MHz of spectrum in the 700 MHz band which may be used to offer
services competitive with the services we offer or plan to offer. The FCC is obligated to auction
the 700 MHz spectrum by January 2008, and the FCC has released an order establishing certain rules
regarding this spectrum and is in the process of taking comment on
proposed band plan alternatives, service rules, construction and
performance build-out obligations, configuration of the 700 MHz public
safety spectrum, revisions to the 700 MHz guard bands and
competitive bidding procedures. Furthermore, the FCC may pursue policies
designed to make available additional spectrum for the provision of wireless services in each of
our metropolitan areas, which may increase the number of wireless competitors and enhance the
ability of our wireless competitors to offer additional plans and services that we may be unable to
successfully compete against.
40
We and our suppliers may be subject to claims of infringement regarding telecommunications
technologies that are protected by patents and other intellectual property rights.
Telecommunications technologies are protected by a wide array of patents and other
intellectual property rights. As a result, third parties may assert infringement claims against us
or our suppliers from time to time based on our or their general business operations, the
equipment, software or services we or they use or provide, or the specific operation of our
wireless networks. We generally have indemnification agreements with the manufacturers, licensors
and suppliers who provide us with the equipment, software and technology that we use in our
business to protect us against possible infringement claims, but we cannot guarantee that we will
be fully protected against all losses associated with an infringement claim. Our suppliers may be
subject to claims that if proven could preclude their supplying us with the products and services
we require to run our business, require them to change the products and services they provide to us
in a way which could have a material adverse effect, or cause them to increase their charges for
their products and services to us. Moreover, we may be subject to claims that products, software
and services provided by different vendors which we combine to offer our services may infringe the
rights of third parties and we may not have any indemnification protection from our vendors for
these claims. Further, we have been, and may be, subject to further claims that certain business
processes we use may infringe the rights of third parties, and we may have no indemnification
rights from any of our vendors or suppliers. Whether or not an infringement claim is valid or
successful, it could adversely affect our business by diverting managements attention, involving
us in costly and time-consuming litigation, requiring us to enter into royalty or licensing
agreements (which may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all), require us to pay royalties
for prior periods, requiring us or our suppliers to redesign our or their business operations,
processes or systems to avoid claims of infringement, or requiring us to purchase products and
services from different vendors or not sell certain products or services. If a claim is found to be
valid or if we or our suppliers cannot successfully negotiate a required royalty or license
agreement, it could disrupt our business, prevent us from offering certain products or services and
cause us to incur losses of customers or revenues, any or all of which could be material and could
adversely affect our business, financial performance, operating results and the market price of our
stock.
Substantially all of our network infrastructure equipment is manufactured or provided by a single
infrastructure vendor and any failure by that vendor could result in a material adverse effect on
us.
We have entered into a general purchase agreement with an initial term of three years,
effective as of June 6, 2005, with Lucent Technologies, Inc., or Lucent, now known as Alcatel
Lucent, as our network infrastructure supplier of PCS CDMA system products and services, including
without limitation, wireless base stations, switches, power, cable and transmission equipment and
services. The agreement does not cover the spectrum we recently acquired in Auction 66 or any
spectrum we may acquire in the 700 MHz band or future AWS or non-PCS
auctions. The agreement provides for both exclusive and
non-exclusive pricing for PCS CDMA products and the agreement may be renewed at our option on an
annual basis for three additional years after its initial three-year term concludes. Substantially
all of our PCS network infrastructure equipment is manufactured or provided by Alcatel Lucent. A
substantial portion of the equipment manufactured or provided by Alcatel Lucent is proprietary,
which means that equipment and software from other manufacturers may not work with Alcatel Lucents
equipment and software, or may require the expenditure of additional capital, which may be
material. If Alcatel Lucent ceases to develop, or substantially delays development of, new products
or support existing equipment and software, we may be required to spend significant amounts of
money to replace such equipment and software, may not be able to offer new products or service, and
may not be able to compete effectively in our markets. If we fail to continue purchasing our PCS
CDMA products exclusively from Alcatel Lucent, we may have to pay certain liquidated damages based
on the difference in prices between exclusive and non-exclusive prices, which may be material to
us.
Because we may have issued stock options and shares of common stock in violation of federal and
state securities laws and some of our stockholders and option holders may have a right of
rescission, we intend to make a rescission offer to certain holders of shares of our common stock
and options to purchase shares of our common stock.
Certain options to purchase our common stock granted since January 2004 and certain shares
issued upon exercise of options granted during this period may not have been exempt from the
registration and qualification requirements of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, or under the securities laws of a
few states. Of such options, approximately 936,546 remain outstanding
with a weighted average exercise price per option of $7.03. We issued these
options to purchase shares of our common stock in reliance on Rule 701 under the Securities Act. However, we
may not have been entitled to rely on Rule 701 because (1) during certain periods we exceeded
certain
41
thresholds in the rule and may not have delivered to our option holders the financial and
other information required to be delivered by Rule 701; and (2) during certain periods in 2004 and
2006 we were subject to, or should have been subject to, the periodic reporting requirements under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
As a result, certain holders of options to purchase our common stock
may have a right to require us to repurchase those securities if we are found to be in violation of
federal or state securities laws.
In
order to address these issues, we are in the process of preparing and
filing a registration statement on Form S-1 to make a rescission offer to the holders of
options to purchase up to approximately 936,546 shares of our common stock. We will be making this offer to up to approximately 338 of our current and former
employees. If the rescission offer is accepted by all persons to whom it is made, we could be
required to make aggregate payments of up to approximately $1.4 million. This amount reflects a
purchase price equal to 20% of the aggregate exercise price
for each option that is the subject of the rescission offer. It is possible that an option holder
could argue that the purchase price for the options does not represent an adequate remedy for the
issuance of the option in violation of applicable securities laws, and a court may find that we are
required to pay a greater amount for the options.
There can be no assurance that the SEC or state regulatory bodies will not take the position
that any rescission offers should extend to all holders of options granted during the relevant periods. The Securities Act also does not provide that a
rescission offer will extinguish a holders right to rescind the
grant of an option that was not registered or exempt from the registration requirements under the
Securities Act. Consequently, should any recipients of our rescission offer reject the offer,
expressly or impliedly, we may remain liable under the Securities Act for the purchase price of the
options that are subject to the rescission offer.
We failed to register our options under the Exchange Act and, as a result, we may face potential
claims under federal and state securities laws.
As
of December 31, 2005, options granted under our Second Amended
and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan of Metro PCS, Inc., as amended, and our
Amended and Restated Metro PCS Communications, Inc. 2004 Equity
Incentive Compensation Plan were held by more than 500 holders. As a result, we were required to file a
registration statement registering the options pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act no
later than April 30, 2006. We failed to file a registration statement within the required time
period.
If we had filed a registration statement pursuant to Section 12(g) as required, we would have
become subject to the periodic reporting requirements of Section 13 of the Exchange Act upon the
effectiveness of that registration statement. In April 2007, we filed quarterly reports on Form
10-Q for the periods after March 31, 2006, and on March 30, 2007, we filed an annual report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. We did not file any current reports on Form 8-K
during the period beginning April 30, 2006 through March 20, 2007.
Our failure to file the current reports on Form 8-K and to file our quarterly reports on Form
10-Q in a timely manner that we would have been required to file had we registered our common stock
pursuant to Section 12(g), and to file a registration statement
pursuant to
Section 12(g) could give rise to potential claims by present or former stockholders
based on the theory that such holders were harmed by the absence of
such public reports or our failure to file a registration statement
pursuant to
Section 12(g). In
addition to any claims by present or former stockholders, we could be subject to administrative
and/or civil actions by the SEC. If any such claim or action is asserted, we could incur
significant expenses and divert managements attention in defending them.
Despite current indebtedness levels, we will be able to incur substantially more debt and
currently anticipate incurring additional debt. This could further exacerbate the risks associated
with our leverage.
We will be able to incur additional debt in the future despite our current level of
indebtedness. The terms of the senior secured credit facility and the indenture governing the
senior notes will allow us to incur substantial amounts of additional debt, subject to certain
limitations. There are no restrictions on our or any of our future unrestricted subsidiaries
ability to incur additional indebtedness.
We are currently contemplating the issuance by MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. of up to an additional
$300 million of senior notes under our existing indenture for general corporate purposes, which
could include participation in the upcoming FCC 700 MHz auction. This additional indebtedness or
any future debt we may incur could exacerbate the risks associated with our current level of
indebtedness.
The FCC may license additional spectrum which may not be appropriate for or available to us or
which may allow new competitors to enter our markets.
The FCC periodically makes additional spectrum available for wireless use. For instance, the
FCC recently allocated and auctioned an additional 90 MHz of spectrum for AWS. The AWS band plan
made some licenses available in small (Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and Rural Service Area
(RSA)) license areas, although the predominant amount of spectrum remains allocated on a regional
basis in combinations of 10 MHz and 20 MHz spectrum blocks. This band plan tended to favor large
incumbent carriers with nationwide footprints and presented challenges for us in acquiring
additional spectrum. The FCC also has allocated an additional 40 MHz of spectrum devoted to AWS. It
is in the process of considering the channel assignment policies for 20 MHz of this spectrum and
has indicated that it will initiate a further proceeding with regard to the remaining 20 MHz in the
future. The FCC
42
also is in the process of taking comments on the
appropriate geographic license areas and
channel blocks, service rules, and construction and performance
build-out obligations for an additional 60 MHz of spectrum in the 700 MHz band. Specifically, on April 27,
2007, the FCC issued a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment
on possible changes to the 700 MHz band plan, including possible changes in the service area and
channel block sizes for the 60 MHz of as yet unauctioned 700 MHz spectrum. The FCC is also seeking
comments on performance build-out requirements, revisions to the 700 MHz guard bands, competitive
bidding procedures and the configuration for the 700 MHz public safety spectrum. We, along with
other small, regional and rural carriers, have previously filed comments advocating changes to the
current 700 MHz band plan to create a greater number of licenses with smaller spectrum blocks and
geographic area sizes and for relaxed performance build-out
obligations. Several national wireless carriers have previously filed comments supporting
larger license areas and other interested parties have made band plan and licensing proposals that
differ from ours by favoring larger license areas, larger license blocks and the use of
combinatorial bidding, which we do not favor, to enable applicants to more easily assemble a
nationwide foot print. In addition, one commenter advocates reassigning 30 MHz of the 700 MHz band
which now is allocated for commercial broadband use, to public safety use to create a nationwide,
interoperable broadband network that public safety users can access on a priority basis. The FCC is
also seeking comment on a proposal to allocate 10 MHz of the 700 MHz
band, which now is allocated for
commercial broadband use, on a nationwide basis, in accordance with specific public safety rules
that would force the licensee to fund the construction of a nationwide broadband infrastructure,
offer service only on a wholesale basis, and provide public safety with priority access to the 10
MHz of spectrum during emergencies. In September 2006, the FCC also sought comment on proposals to
increase the flexibility of guard band licensees in the 700 MHz spectrum. Furthermore, in December
2006, the FCC sought comment on the possible implementation of a nationwide broadband interoperable
network in the 700 MHz band allocated for public safety use, which also could be used by commercial
service providers on a secondary basis. We cannot predict the likely outcome of those proceedings
or whether they will benefit or adversely affect us.
There are a series of risks associated with any new allocation of broadband spectrum by the
FCC. First, there is no assurance that the spectrum made available by the FCC will be appropriate
for or complementary to our business plan and system requirements. Second, depending upon the
quantity, nature and cost of the new spectrum, it is possible that we will not be granted any of
the new spectrum and, therefore, we may have difficulty in providing new services. This could
adversely affect the valuation of the licenses we already hold. Third, we may be unable to purchase
additional spectrum or the prices paid for such spectrum may negatively affect our ability to be
competitive in the market. Fourth, new spectrum may allow new competitors to enter our markets and
impact our ability to grow our business and compete effectively in our market. Fifth, new spectrum
may be sold at prices lower than we paid at past auctions or in private transactions, thus
adversely affecting the value of our existing assets. Sixth, the clearing obligations for existing
licensees on new spectrum may take longer or cost more than anticipated. Seventh, our competitors
may be able to use this new spectrum to provide products and services that we cannot provide using
our existing spectrum. Eighth, there can be no assurance that our competitors will not use certain
FCC programs, such as its designated entity program or the proposed nationwide interoperable
networks for public safety use, to purchase or acquire spectrum at materially lower prices than
what we are required to pay. Any of these risks, if they occur, may have a material adverse effect
on our business.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
On February 9, 2007, our stockholders holding greater than a majority of shares then
outstanding adopted resolutions by written consent authorizing the following actions:
(1) An amendment and restatement of the MetroPCS Communications, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive
Compensation Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance to 40,500,000 and to make
certain other changes.
(2) The amendment and restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation, to be effective upon
the consummation of our initial public offering, to provide for certain changes consistent with
becoming a public company.
(3) The amendment and restatement of our Bylaws, to be effective upon the consummation of our
initial public offering, to provide for certain changes consistent with becoming a public company.
(4) The election of all of our directors, and, effective upon the consummation of our initial
public offering, to the class and for the term set forth below:
Class III Directors (serving a 3 year initial term)
James N. Perry, Jr.
Arthur C. Patterson
C. Kevin Landry
Class II Directors (serving a 2 year initial term)
James F. Wade
John Sculley
W. Michael Barnes
Class I Directors (serving a 1 year initial term)
Roger D. Linquist
Walker C. Simmons
Item 5. Other Information
Effective February 9, 2007, our stockholders approved the Amended and Restated MetroPCS
Communications, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, which increased the number of shares
available for issuance pursuant to the plan to 40,500,000 and made certain other changes.
Effective
February 9, 2007, our stockholders elected the following
directors: James N. Perry, Jr.; Arthur C. Patterson; C. Kevin Landry;
James F. Wade; John Sculley; W. Michael Barnes; Roger D. Linquist;
and Walker C. Simmons. See Item 4 "Submission of Matters
to a Vote of Security Holders."
On February 20,
2007, MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. amended its senior
secured credit facility to reduce the margin used
to determine the senior secured credit facility interest rate to 2.25% from 2.50%.
43
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2007, among MetroPCS Wireless,
Inc., as borrower, the several lenders from time to time parties thereto, Bear Stearns Corporate
Lending Inc., as administrative agent and syndication agent, Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., as sole lead
arranger and joint book runner, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as joint book
runner and Banc of America Securities LLC, as joint book runner (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to
Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-139793) by MetroPCS Communications, Inc. filed on
February 27, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2007, between MetroPCS Communications, Inc. and American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent, which includes the form of Certificate or
Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of MetroPCS Communications, Inc. as
Exhibit A, the Form of Rights Certificate as Exhibit B and Summary of Rights as Exhibit C (filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by MetroPCS Communications, Inc. on March 30,
2007 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
44
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|
|
Date: May 15, 2007 |
By: |
/s/ Roger D. Linquist
|
|
|
|
Roger D. Linquist |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 15, 2007 |
By: |
/s/ J. Braxton Carter
|
|
|
|
J. Braxton Carter |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
45
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551, this Exhibit is
furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be filed. |
46